Cited By
View all- Farkas THughes NFiebrink R(2024)How Boardgame Players Imagine Interacting With TechnologyProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36770788:CHI PLAY(1-24)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
Towards Situation Awareness and Attention Guidance in a Multiplayer Environment using Augmented Reality and Carcassonne
Authors: 
David Kadish, Arezoo Sarkheyli-Hägele, Jose Font, Georg Hägele, Diederick C. Niehorster, 
Thomas PedersonAuthors Info & Claims
Pages 133 - 139
Abstract
Augmented reality (AR) games are a rich environment for researching and testing computational systems that provide subtle user guidance and training. In particular computer systems that aim to augment a user’s situation awareness benefit from the range of sensors and computing power available in AR headsets. The main focus of this work-in-progress paper is the introduction of the concept of the individualized Situation Awareness-based Attention Guidance (SAAG) system used to increase humans’ situating awareness and the augmented reality version of the board game Carcassonne for validation and evaluation of SAAG. Furthermore, we present our initial work in developing the SAAG pipeline, the generation of game state encodings, the development and training of a game AI, and the design of situation modeling and eye-tracking processes.
References
[1]
Pippin Barr, James Noble, and Robert Biddle. 2007. Video game values: Human–computer interaction and games. Interacting with Computers 19, 2 (2007), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2006.08.008 HCI Issues in Computer Games.
[2]
Julie Carmigniani and Borko Furht. 2011. Augmented reality: an overview. Handbook of augmented reality(2011), 3–46.
[3]
Mica R. Endsley. 1995. Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37, 1 (mar 1995), 32–64. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
[4]
Mica R Endsley. 2017. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. In Situational awareness. Routledge, 9–42.
[5]
Stefan Fuchs and Anna Belardinelli. 2021. Gaze-Based Intention Estimation for Shared Autonomy in Pick-and-Place Tasks. Frontiers in Neurorobotics 15 (apr 2021), 33. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2021.647930
[6]
Steve Hinske, Matthias Lampe, Carsten Magerkurth, and Carsten Röcker. 2007. Classifying pervasive games: on pervasive computing and mixed reality. Concepts and technologies for Pervasive Games-A Reader for Pervasive Gaming Research 1, 20 (2007), 1–20.
[7]
Kuo-Ting Huang, Christopher Ball, Jessica Francis, Rabindra Ratan, Josephine Boumis, and Joseph Fordham. 2019. Augmented versus virtual reality in education: an exploratory study examining science knowledge retention when using augmented reality/virtual reality mobile applications. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 22, 2(2019), 105–110.
[8]
Arthur Juliani, Vincent-Pierre Berges, Ervin Teng, Andrew Cohen, Jonathan Harper, Chris Elion, Chris Goy, Yuan Gao, Hunter Henry, Marwan Mattar, and Danny Lange. 2018. Unity: A General Platform for Intelligent Agents. (sep 2018). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1809.02627 arxiv:1809.02627
[9]
Thomas N. Kipf and Max Welling. 2016. Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks. 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017 - Conference Track Proceedings (sep 2016). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1609.02907 arxiv:1609.02907
[10]
Marcus Nyström, Diederick C. Niehorster, Richard Andersson, and Ignace Hooge. 2021. The Tobii Pro Spectrum: A useful tool for studying microsaccades?Behavior Research Methods 53, 1 (feb 2021), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.3758/S13428-020-01430-3/TABLES/6
[11]
Pranav Parekh, Shireen Patel, Nivedita Patel, and Manan Shah. 2020. Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in medicine, retail, and games. Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art 3, 1 (2020), 1–20.
[12]
Mario Rubak. 2021. Imitation Learning with the Unity Machine Learning Agents Toolkit. Masters. University of Applied Sciences FH Campus Wein.
[13]
Klaus-Jürgen Wrede. 2000. Carcassonne. Hans im Glück (Germany).
[14]
Georgios N Yannakakis and Julian Togelius. 2014. A panorama of artificial and computational intelligence in games. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 7, 4(2014), 317–335.
[15]
Georgios N. Yannakakis and Julian Togelius. 2018. Artificial Intelligence and Games. Springer. http://gameaibook.org.
[16]
Weirui Ye, Shaohuai Liu, Thanard Kurutach, Pieter Abbeel, and Yang Gao. 2021. Mastering Atari Games with Limited Data. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, M. Ranzato, A. Beygelzimer, Y. Dauphin, P.S. Liang, and J. Wortman Vaughan (Eds.). Vol. 34. Curran Associates, Inc., 25476–25488. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2021/file/d5eca8dc3820cad9fe56a3bafda65ca1-Paper.pdf
Index Terms
- Towards Situation Awareness and Attention Guidance in a Multiplayer Environment using Augmented Reality and Carcassonne
Recommendations
Haptics in Augmented Reality
ICMCS '99: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems - Volume 2An augmented reality system merges synthetic sensory information into a user's perception of a three-dimensional environment. An important performance goal for an augmented reality system is that the user perceives a single seamless environment. In most ...
Extending Virtual Reality Display Wall Environments Using Augmented Reality
SUI '19: Symposium on Spatial User InteractionTwo major form factors for virtual reality are head-mounted displays and large display environments such as CAVE®and the LCD-based successor CAVE2®. Each of these has distinct advantages and limitations based on how they’re used. This work explores ...
Multimodal augmented reality: the norm rather than the exception
MVAR '16: Proceedings of the 2016 workshop on Multimodal Virtual and Augmented RealityAugmented reality (AR) is commonly seen as a technology that overlays virtual imagery onto a participant's view of the world. In line with this, most AR research is focused on what we see. In this paper, we challenge this focus on vision and make a case ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
November 2022
419 pages
ISBN:9781450392112
DOI:10.1145/3505270
Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 07 November 2022
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Extended-abstract
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- Crafoord Foundation
Conference
CHI PLAY '22
Sponsor:
CHI PLAY '22: The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
November 2 - 5, 2022
Bremen, Germany
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 421 of 1,386 submissions, 30%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 157Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)67
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Farkas THughes NFiebrink R(2024)How Boardgame Players Imagine Interacting With TechnologyProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36770788:CHI PLAY(1-24)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format