Creativity Support Tools and Convergent Thinking: A Preliminary Review on Idea Evaluation and Selection
Pages 305 - 311
Abstract
Creativity Support Tools (CSTs) have grown exponentially in the HCI field. However, this growth has always leaned towards divergent thinking, thus neglecting convergent thinking. We confirm this information based on a preliminary review between 2012 and 2022 in the ACM Digital Library. Our findings confirm that researchers and practitioners have been primarily interested in developing tools to support idea generation, minimizing studies on evaluating and selecting ideas. We focused our research on four major points: i) the domain of the tool, ii) the type of system and interface developed in the tools, iii) the methodology used, and iv) the creative context of the tools. Based on this information, we contribute six guidelines to support the improvement of existing CSTs and the development of new CSTs.
References
[1]
Nanna Inie and Peter Dalsgaard. 2020. How Interaction Designers Use Tools to Manage Ideas. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 27, 2, (April 2020), 26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365104
[2]
Tim Coughlan and Peter Johnson. 2008. Idea management in creative lives. In Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '08). Association for Computing Machinery, pp 3081–3086. https://doi.org/10.1145/1358628.1358811
[3]
Jonas Frich, Lindsay MacDonald Vermeulen, Christian Remy, Michael Mose Biskjaer, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2019. Mapping the Landscape of Creativity Support Tools in HCI. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Proceedings (DIS '19), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300619
[4]
Jonas Frich, Michael Mose Biskjaer, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2018. Twenty Years of Creativity Research in Human-Computer Interaction: Current State and Future Directions. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '18), 1235–1257. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196732
[5]
Joy Paul Guilford. 1950. Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 9, 444-454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
[6]
Bela H. Banathy. 1996. Designing Social Systems in a Changing World. Springer New York, NY.
[7]
Ben Shneiderman. 2000. Creating creativity: user interfaces for supporting innovation. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7, 1 (March 2000), 114– 138. https://doi.org/10.1145/344949.345077
[8]
Ben Shneiderman. 2007. Creativity support tools: accelerating discovery and innovation. Commun. ACM 50, 12 (December 2007), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/1323688.1323689
[9]
Ben Shneiderman. 2009. Creativity support tools: A grand challenge for HCI researchers. In Engineering the User Interface. 84800-136-7_1
[10]
Yuxi Zhu, Simone M. Ritter and Ap Dijksterhuis. 2021. The Effect of rank-ordering strategy on creative idea selection performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 2 (March 2021), 360-376. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2743
[11]
David Gershom Myers. 2006. The Elephants Teach: Creative Writing since 1880. University of Chicago Press.
[12]
Ali Jahanian, Jerry Liu, Qian Lin, Daniel Tretter, Eamonn O'Brien-Strain, Seungyon Claire Lee, Nic Lyons, and Jan Allebach. 2013. Recommendation system for automatic design of magazine covers. In Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (IUI '13), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1145/2449396.2449411
[13]
Youngseung Jeon, Seungwan Jin, Patrick C. Shih, and Kyungsik Han. 2021. FashionQ: An AI-Driven Creativity Support Tool for Facilitating Ideation in Fashion Design. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '21), 1– 18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445093
[14]
Yen-Ting Cho, Yen-Ling Kuo, Yen-Ting Yeh, Yen-Yi Huang, and Po-Lun Huang. 2021. IntuModels: Enabling Interactive Modeling for the Novice through Idea Generation and Selection. In Creativity and Cognition (C&C '21), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450741.3465241
[15]
Youwen Kang, Zhida Sun, Sitong Wang, Zeyu Huang, Ziming Wu, and Xiaojuan Ma. 2021. MetaMap: Supporting Visual Metaphor Ideation through Multi-dimensional Example-based Exploration. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '21), 1– 15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445325
[16]
Maximilian Mackeprang, Abderrahmane Khiat, and Claudia Müller-Birn. 2018. Concept Validation during Collaborative Ideation and Its Effect on Ideation Outcome. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '18), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188485
[17]
Ana Rodrigues, David Honório, Diogo Cabral, and Pedro Campos. 2022. Exploring the creative process in a brainstorming session to develop a web- based system for idea selection. In Creativity and Cognition (C&C '22), 553–557. https://doi.org/10.1145/3527927.3535213
[18]
Ioanna Lykourentzou, Faez Ahmed, Costas Papastathis, Irwyn Sadien, and Konstantinos Papangelis. 2018. When Crowds Give You Lemons: Filtering Innovative Ideas using a Diverse-Bag-of-Lemons Strategy. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 115 (November 2018), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274384
[19]
Yijun Zhou, Yuki Koyama, Masataka Goto, and Takeo Igarashi. 2021. Interactive Exploration-Exploitation Balancing for Generative Melody Composition. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '21), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/3397481.3450663
[20]
Jana Schumann, Patrick C. Shih, David F. Redmiles, and Graham Horton. 2012. Supporting initial trust in distributed idea generation and idea evaluation. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Supporting group work (GROUP '12), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1145/2389176.2389207
[21]
Alwin de Rooij, Philip J. Corr, and Sara Jones. 2015. Emotion and Creativity: Hacking into Cognitive Appraisal Processes to Augment Creative Ideation. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '15), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757226.2757227
[22]
Ben Shneiderman. 2020. Bridging the Gap Between Ethics and Practice: Guidelines for Reliable, Safe, and Trustworthy Human-centered AI Systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 10, 4, (December 2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3419764
[23]
Rainer Muhlhoff. 2020. Human-aided artificial intelligence: Or, how to run large computations in human brains? Toward a media sociology of machine learning. New Media & Society, 22, 10 (November 2020), 1868-1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819885334
[24]
John Joon Young Chung, Shiqing He, and Eytan Adar. 2021. The Intersection of Users, Roles, Interactions, and Technologies in Creativity Support Tools. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 (DIS '21), pp 1817–1833. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462050
[25]
Shunan Guo, Fan Du, Sana Malik, Eunyee Koh, Sungchul Kim, Zhicheng Liu, Donghyun Kim, Hongyuan Zha, and Nan Cao. 2019. Visualizing Uncertainty and Alternatives in Event Sequence Predictions. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300803
[26]
Jakob Nielsen and Rolf Molich. 1990. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '90), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97281
Recommendations
Creativity Support Tool for Sustainability: An AI-first Approach to Accelerating the Idea Selection Process
C&C '23: Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Creativity and CognitionCreativity is an important milestone for innovation. Investing in new ideas is fundamental and promising for innovation in several sectors. Most European citizens feel that they need to do more to help the planet's sustainability, and, as a result, human ...
How Digital Tools Impact Convergent and Divergent Thinking in Design Ideation
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsDigital tools that support creative activities are ubiquitous in the design industry, yet practitioners appear to prefer pen and paper for design ideation. To better understand this exception, we conducted a comparative study between analog and digital ...
Quantifying the Creativity Support of Digital Tools through the Creativity Support Index
Creativity support tools help people engage creatively with the world, but measuring how well a tool supports creativity is challenging since creativity is ill-defined. To this end, we developed the Creativity Support Index (CSI), which is a psychometric ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2023
564 pages
ISBN:9798400701801
DOI:10.1145/3591196
Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 19 June 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Poster
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- FCT/MCTES CEECINST/00122/2018
- FCT/MCTES LARSyS
Conference
C&C '23
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 108 of 371 submissions, 29%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 405Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)227
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)32
Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format