More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

YOU BETTA WERK: Using Wearable Technology Performance Driven Inclusive Transdisciplinary Collaboration to Facilitate Authentic Learning

Authors:

Edie Cheezburger,

Kathleen L Tynan,

Eva L Christensen,

Jordan Eggleston,

Paige Greenfield,

Chloe Lynne Choi,

Axel Gustafsson,

Jonatan Holmgren,

Maribeth Gandy,

Jay David BolterAuthors Info & Claims

TEI '21: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

Article No.: 3, Pages 1 - 12

https://doi.org/10.1145/3430524.3440622

Published: 14 February 2021 Publication History

TEI '21: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

YOU BETTA WERK: Using Wearable Technology Performance Driven Inclusive Transdisciplinary Collaboration to Facilitate Authentic Learning

Pages 1 - 12

Abstract
References

Abstract

Working or WERKing on a wearable technology project in a transdisciplinary group can be an effective way of learning new skills and collaboration techniques. This paper describes a case study of running a wearable technology group project within an undergraduate course entitled Wearable Technology and Society. The computational media students in the class collaborated with outside performance artists (drag queens and a street dancer) to create interactive performance garments. Design methods such as the use of boundary objects aided in communication of ideas and cooperation across disciplines and cultural barriers. The requirement that the interactive garment function appropriately in a real performance lent urgency and gravity to the experience, motivating cohesive and expedited problem solving in the transdisciplinary group. The use of these methods on a project with real world outcomes and consequences facilitated an authentic learning experience for the students involved.

References

[1]

Paul M.A. Baker and Nathan W. Moon. 2010. Policy development and access to wireless technologies for people with disabilities: Results of policy Delphi research. Universal Access in the Information Society 9, 3 (2010), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-009-0170-3

Digital Library

[2]

Paul M A Baker, Maribeth Gandy, and Clint Zeagler. 2015. Innovation and Wearable Computing: A Proposed Collaborative Policy Design Framework. IEEE Internet Computing 19, Sept.-Oct. 2015(2015), 18 – 25. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2015.74

Digital Library

[3]

Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Andy Crabtree, Martin Flintham, Brendan Walker, Joe Marshall, Boriana Koleva, Stefan Rennick Egglestone, Gabriella Giannachi, Matt Adams, Nick Tandavanitj, and Ju Row Farr. 2013. Performance-Led Research in the Wild. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20, 3(2013), 14:1–14:22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2491500.2491502

Digital Library

[4]

Mark Bergman, Kalle Lyytinen, and Gloria Mark. 2007. Boundary Objects in Design: An Ecological View of Design Artifacts. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8, 11 (2007), 546–568.

[5]

Susanne Bødker and Kaj Grønæk. 1991. Cooperative Prototyping - Users and designers in mutual activity. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34, 3 (1991), 453–478.

Digital Library

[6]

J.D. Bransford, AL Brown, and RR Cocking. 2000. How People Learn. National Academy Press.

[7]

Leah Buechley. 2006. A Construction Kit for Electronic Textiles. In 2006 10th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers. Ieee, 83–90.

[8]

Leah Buechley, Mike Eisenberg, Jaime Catchen, and Ali Crockett. 2008. The LilyPad Arduino. (2008), 423. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357123

Digital Library

[9]

Leah Buechley and Hannah Perner-Wilson. 2012. Crafting technology: Reimagining the processes, materials, and cultures of electronics. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 19, 3(2012), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/2362364.2362369

Digital Library

[10]

Vannevar Bush. 1945. As we may think. The atlantic monthlyJULY(1945), 1–14.

[11]

Paul R Carlile. 2002. A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries : Boundary Objects in New Product Development. Organization Science 13, 4 (2002), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953

Digital Library

[12]

Eun Kyoung Choe, Sunny Consolvo, Jaeyeon Jung, Beverly Harrison, and Julie A. Kientz. 2011. Living in a glass house: A survey of private moments in the home. UbiComp’11 - Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (2011), 41–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/2030112.2030118

Digital Library

[13]

Zane Cochran, Clint Zeagler, and Sonia McCall. 2015. Addressing Dresses: User Interface Allowing for Interdisciplinary Design and Calibration of LED Embedded Garments. In ISWC ’15 Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/2802083.2808403

Digital Library

[14]

Jim Dator, John A. Sweeney, Aubrey Yee, and Aaron Rosa. 2013. Communicating power: Technological innovation and social change in the past, present, and futures. Journal of Futures Studies 17, 4 (2013), 117–134.

[15]

Kayla Desportes and Betsy Disalvo. 2019. Trials and Tribulations of Novices Working with the Arduino. In ACM International Computing Education Research (ICER). 219–227.

[16]

Betsy Disalvo. 2016. Participatory Design through a Learning Science Lens. In #chi4good CHI. San Jose, CA, USA, 4459–4463.

[17]

Lucy Dunne, Halley Profita, and Clint Zeagler. 2014. Social Aspects of Wearability and Interaction. In Wearable Sensors: Fundamentals, Implementation and Applications, Edward Sazonov and Michael Neuman (Eds.). Elsevier Inc., 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-418662-0.00026-X

[18]

L.E. Dunne, H. Profita, C. Zeagler, J. Clawson, S. Gilliland, E.Y.-L. Do, and J. Budd. 2014. The social comfort of wearable technology and gestural interaction. In 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944540

[19]

Virginia Hencken Elsasser. 2010. Textiles: Concepts and Principles(3rd ed.). Fairchild Books.

[20]

Maribeth Gandy, P.M.A. Paul M.A. Baker, and Clint Zeagler. 2016. Imagining futures: A collaborative policy/device design for wearable computing. Futures 87(2016), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.11.004

[21]

F. Gemperle, C. Kasabach, J. Stivoric, M. Bauer, and R. Martin. 1998. Design for wearability. In Digest of Papers. Second International Symposium on Wearable Computers. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.1998.729537

[22]

Scott Gilliland, Nicholas Komor, Thad Starner, and Clint Zeagler. 2010. The textile interface swatchbook: Creating graphical user interface-like widgets with conductive embroidery. In Proceedings - International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2010.5665876

[23]

E. Goffman. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life.

[24]

C Gopalsamy, S Park, R Rajamanickam, and S Jayaraman. 1999. The Wearable MotherboardTM : The First Generation Responsive Textile Structures Medical Applications. (1999), 152–168.

[25]

MS Granovetter. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology 78, 6 (1973), 1360–1380. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392

[26]

J. Alex Halderman, Brent Waters, and Edward W. Felten. 2004. Privacy management for portable recording devices. WPES’04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (2004), 16–24.

Digital Library

[27]

Cindy E Hmelo-silver. 2004. Problem-Based Learning : What and How Do Students Learn ?Educational Psychology Review 16, 3 (2004), 235–266.

[28]

Michaela Honauer, Danielle Wilde, and Eva Hornecker. 2020. Overcoming reserve - Supporting professional appropriation of interactive costumes. DIS 2020 - Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2020), 2189–2200. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395498

Digital Library

[29]

Kim K. P. Johnson, Susan J. Torntore, and Joanne B. Eicher (Eds.). 2003. Fashion Foundations Early Writings on Fashion and Dress. Berg, New York, New York, USA.

[30]

Lee Jones, Sara Nabil, Amanda McLeod, and Audrey Girouard. 2020. Wearable bits: Scaffolding creativity with a prototyping toolkit for wearable e-Textiles. TEI 2020 - Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(2020), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374954

Digital Library

[31]

Majeed Kazemitabaar, Jason McPeak, Alexander Jiao, Liang He, Thomas Outing, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2017. MakerWear: A tangible approach to interactive wearable creation for children. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings 2017-May (2017), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025887

Digital Library

[32]

Marc Langheinrich. 2010. Privacy in Ubiquitous Computing. In Ubiquitous Computing Fundamentals, John Krumm (Ed.). Chapter 3, 95–160.

[33]

Oscar D. Lara and Miguel a. Labrador. 2013. A Survey on Human Activity Recognition using Wearable Sensors. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 15, 3 (2013), 1192–1209. https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2012.110112.00192

[34]

T. Martin, M. Jones, J. Edmison, and R. Shenoy. 2003. Towards a design framework for wearable electronic textiles. Seventh IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 2003. Proceedings. (2003), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2003.1241411

[35]

Tom Martin, Kahyun Kim, Jason Forsyth, Lisa McNair, Eloise Coupey, and Ed Dorsa. 2011. An interdisciplinary undergraduate design course for wearable and pervasive computing products. Proceedings - International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC (2011), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2011.13

Digital Library

[36]

Tahmidul Islam Molla, Steven Goodman, Nicholas Schleif, Mary Ellen Berglund, Cade Zacharias, Crystal Compton, and Lucy E. Dunne. 2017. Surface-Mount Manufacturing for E-Textile Circuits. In International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, Maui, Hawaii, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3123021.3123058

Digital Library

[37]

Sara Nevay and Christopher S.C. Lim. 2015. The role of co-design in wearables adoption. Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors 2015 (2015), 109–116.

[38]

David H. Nguyen, Gabriela Marcu, Gillian R. Hayes, Khai N. Truong, James Scott, Marc Langheinrich, and Christof Roduner. 2009. Encountering SenseCam: Personal recording technologies in everyday life. ACM International Conference Proceeding SeriesMay 2016 (2009), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1145/1620545.1620571

Digital Library

[39]

Hannah Perner-Wilson, Leah Buechley, and Mika Satomi. 2011. Handcrafting textile interfaces from a kit-of-no-parts. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Tangible Embedded and Embodied Interaction, TEI’11(2011), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1145/1935701.1935715

Digital Library

[40]

E.R. Post and M. Orth. 1997. Smart fabric, or ”wearable clothing”. In Digest of Papers. First International Symposium on Wearable Computers. IEEE Comput. Soc, 167–168. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.1997.629937

[41]

E. R. Post, M. Orth, P. R. Russo, and N. Gershenfeld. 2000. E-broidery: Design and fabrication of textile-based computing. IBM Systems Journal 39, 3.4 (2000), 840–860. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.393.0840

Digital Library

[42]

E Rehmi Post and Kit Waal. 2010. Electrostatic Power Harvesting in Textiles. Proc. ESA Annual Meeting on Electrostatics(2010), 1–10.

[43]

Halley Profita, James Clawson, Scott Gilliland, Clint Zeagler, Thad Starner, Jim Budd, and Ellen Yi-Luen E.Y.-L. Do. 2013. Don’t mind me touching my wrist: a case study of interacting with on-body technology in public. Proceedings of the 17th annual International symposium on wearable computers - ISWC ’13 (2013), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493988.2494331

Digital Library

[44]

Andrew Quitmeyer and Hannah Perner-Wilson. 2015. Wearable studio practice: Design considerations for digital crafting in harsh environments. UbiComp and ISWC 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and the Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (2015), 1285–1294. https://doi.org/10.1145/2800835.2807926

Digital Library

[45]

Martin Raymond. 2010. The Trend Forecaster’s Handbook. Laurence King Publishing Ltd.

[46]

Holger Rhinow, Eva Koppen, and Christoph Meinel. 2012. Design Prototypes as Boundary Objects in Innovation Processes. Conference on Design Research SocietyJuly (2012), 1–10.

[47]

David Williamson Shaffer and Mitchel Resnik. 1999. ”Thick” Authenticity: New Media and Authentic Learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 10, 2 (1999), 195–215.

Digital Library

[48]

SL Star and JR Griesemer. 1989. Institutional Ecology, Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social studies of science(1989). http://sss.sagepub.com/content/19/3/387.short

[49]

Thad Starner. 2001. The Challenges of Wearable computing: Part 1. IEEE Micro 21(2001), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/40.946681

Digital Library

[50]

Thad Starner. 2001. The Challenges of Wearable Computing: Part 2. IEEE Micro 21(2001), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1109/40.946683

Digital Library

[51]

Ruojia Sun, Ryosuke Onose, Margaret Dunne, Andrea Ling, Amanda Denham, and Hsin Liu Kao. 2020. Weaving a second skin: Exploring opportunities for crafting on-skin interfaces through weaving. DIS 2020 - Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2020), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395548

Digital Library

[52]

Karen P. Tang, Jason I. Hong, and Daniel P. Siewiorek. 2011. Understanding how visual representations of location feeds affect end-user privacy concerns. UbiComp’11 - Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (2011), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1145/2030112.2030141

Digital Library

[53]

M Weiser. 1991. The computer for the 21st century. Scientific american (1991).

[54]

Clint Zeagler. 2017. Where to Wear It : Functional, Technical, and Social Considerations in On - Body Location for Wearable Technology 20 Years of Designing for Wearability. In International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Vol. Part F1305. Maui, Hawaii. https://doi.org/10.1145/3123021.3123042

Digital Library

[55]

Clint Zeagler, Stephen Audy, Scott Pobiner, Halley Profita, Scott Gilliland, and Thad Starner. 2013. The electronic textile interface workshop: Facilitating interdisciplinary collaboration. International Symposium on Technology and Society, Proceedings (2013), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.2013.6613105

[56]

Clint Zeagler, Maribeth Gandy, and Paul M.A. Baker. 2018. The Assistive Wearable: Inclusive by Design. Assistive Technology Outcomes & Benefits 12 (2018).

[57]

Clint Zeagler, Maribeth Gandy, Scott Gilliland, Delton Moore, Rocco Centrella, and Brandon Montgomery. 2017. In Harmony: Making a wearable musical instrument as a case study of using boundary objects in an interdisciplinary collaborative design process. In DIS 2017 - Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, Edinburgh. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064678

Digital Library

[58]

Clint Zeagler, Scott Gilliland, Stephen Audy, and Thad Starner. 2013. Can I Wash It?: The Effect of Washing Conductive Materials Used in Making Textile Based Wearable Electronic Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 17th annual international symposium on International symposium on wearable computers - ISWC ’13. ACM Press, Zurich, Switzerland, 143. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493988.2494344

Digital Library

[59]

C. Zeagler, S. Gilliland, K. Fisher, S. Boyle, and L. Levy. 2017. Le Monstré: An interactive participatory performance costume. In Proceedings - International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC, Vol. Part F1305. https://doi.org/10.1145/3123021.3123070

Digital Library

[60]

Clint Zeagler, Scott Gilliland, Halley Profita, and Thad Starner. 2012. Textile interfaces: Embroidered jog-wheel, beaded tilt sensor, twisted pair ribbon, and sound sequins. In Proceedings - International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC. 60–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2012.29

Digital Library

[61]

Clint Zeagler, Thad Starner, Tavenner Hall, and Maria Wong Sala. 2015. Meeting the Challenge: The Path Towards a Consumer Wearable Computer. Georgia Institute of Technology.

Cited By

DesPortes KMcDermott KBergner YCastro FMusharrat SLunia ACiolfi LHogan TDöring TJenkins Tvan Dijk JHuron SLi ZCoyle DSigner B(2024)DanceBits 'It tells you to see us': Supporting Dance Practices with an Educational Computing KitProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3633350(1-19)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3623509.3633350
Lakhdhir SPerin CSomanath S(2024)Expressive Clothing: Understanding Hobbyist-Sewers' Visions for Self-Expression Through ClothingProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642338(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642338
Allimuthu USingh C. ESivaraman VRatnavathi KKumar Reddy YKrishna OSurekha A(2024)Locating Patient Health Data Theft Using Gradient Boosting with Hybrid Microwave Transmission-Based Wearable Device2024 International Conference on Signal Processing, Computation, Electronics, Power and Telecommunication (IConSCEPT)10.1109/IConSCEPT61884.2024.10627827(1-6)Online publication date: 4-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/IConSCEPT61884.2024.10627827
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

YOU BETTA WERK: Using Wearable Technology Performance Driven Inclusive Transdisciplinary Collaboration to Facilitate Authentic Learning

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Technology, Authentic Learning, and Teacher Roles: A Story of Using a Social Media Tool to Share and Learn
EITT '15: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology

This article documents the author's experience of using Pinterest, a social networking site, in teaching EFL learners in a Chinese university through assigning and carrying out a simple but authentic task. By inviting the students to share summer ...
The surplus value of an authentic learning environment

This article presents a study that provides insight in the effects of an authentic electronic learning environment on student performance and experiences. It is expected that learning in an authentic learning environment results in higher performance ...
The Design of Authentic Inquiry for Online Knowledge-Constructive Interaction and Self-Regulated Learning Processes

This study examined students' self-regulated learning processes and satisfaction within an authentic, inquiry-based learning module in a graduate-level online course. In this design-based case study, a WebQuest-based, authentic learning module was ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

TEI '21: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

February 2021

908 pages

ISBN:9781450382137

DOI:10.1145/3430524

Editor:
Raphael Wimmer
University of Regensburg, Germany
,
General Chairs:
Martin Kaltenbrunner
University of Art and Design Linz, Austria
,
Martin Murer
University of Salzburg, Austria
,
Program Chairs:
Katrin Wolf
Beuth University of Applied Sciences, Berlin, Germany
,
Ian Oakley
UNIST, Ulsan, Republic of Korea

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 February 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

TEI '21

TEI '21: Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

February 14 - 17, 2021

Salzburg, Austria

Acceptance Rates

TEI '21 Paper Acceptance Rate 40 of 136 submissions, 29%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 393 of 1,367 submissions, 29%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

9
Total Citations
View Citations
350
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)22
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

DesPortes KMcDermott KBergner YCastro FMusharrat SLunia ACiolfi LHogan TDöring TJenkins Tvan Dijk JHuron SLi ZCoyle DSigner B(2024)DanceBits 'It tells you to see us': Supporting Dance Practices with an Educational Computing KitProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3633350(1-19)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3623509.3633350
Lakhdhir SPerin CSomanath S(2024)Expressive Clothing: Understanding Hobbyist-Sewers' Visions for Self-Expression Through ClothingProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642338(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642338
Allimuthu USingh C. ESivaraman VRatnavathi KKumar Reddy YKrishna OSurekha A(2024)Locating Patient Health Data Theft Using Gradient Boosting with Hybrid Microwave Transmission-Based Wearable Device2024 International Conference on Signal Processing, Computation, Electronics, Power and Telecommunication (IConSCEPT)10.1109/IConSCEPT61884.2024.10627827(1-6)Online publication date: 4-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/IConSCEPT61884.2024.10627827
Pratte STang AHoover SHoover MLaprairie MLarose COehlberg L(2023)Towards a Design Space for Storytelling on the Fashion Technology RunwayProceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3569009.3573899(1-15)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3569009.3573899
Zhang MStewart RBryan-Kinns N(2022)Integrating Interactive Technology Concepts With Material Expertise in Textile Design DisciplinesProceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3532106.3533535(1277-1287)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3532106.3533535
Chen ACo D(2022)Workshops in TEI: Development, Evaluation, Exploration, and ImplementationProceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3490149.3505562(1-9)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3490149.3505562
Pratte S(2022)Designing Fashion Technology Garments for AwarenessProceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3490149.3503580(1-6)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3490149.3503580
Butts CNitsche M(2022)Embodied Locative Storytelling of African American HistoriesInteractive Storytelling10.1007/978-3-031-22298-6_11(171-192)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-22298-6_11
Schaar RZeagler C(2021)Predicting Inclusive Futures: Wearables, Automation, and Design SpeculationAdvances in Industrial Design10.1007/978-3-030-80829-7_20(157-164)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80829-7_20

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten