[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3477282.3477285acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicsltConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Factors Influencing Acceptance of Technology-enhanced Speech and Language Relearning for Stroke Survivors -A Systematic Review

Published: 17 December 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Speech and language loss is the most common disease for stroke survivors. The process of relearning communication skills is difficult and a time taking process. Technology-enhanced systems (TES) can be useful in speech and language relearning, however, the acceptance and usability of TES for stroke patients have been a matter of concern and more research is needed in this area. This study is therefore aimed to explore the factors that might influence the acceptance of technology-enhanced speech and language relearning after stroke. A systematic literature review was conducted to determine the technology acceptance factors. To ensure the state of the art in the given field, 97 articles written from 2016 to April 2021 were retrieved with a search string aligned to the research question. After applying the exclusion criteria and quality assurance, 13 articles were selected for inclusion. An overview of selected articles, their chosen methodology, and main findings from the articles was presented in a pre-defined table. The results show that patients' physical and cognitive condition, the intensity of relearning exercises, native language, the involvement of friends and family, technical assistance and training, selection of hardware and usability of the graphical interface are important factors for acceptance of TES. Stroke patients tend to use TES. Independent living, treatment in the home environment, and improved quality of life are the major motivations for use of TES. However, TES should be tailor-made and a user-centre approach should be adopted. Finally, proper education and training are essential not only for the patients but for the speech therapists and patients' relatives and friends as well.

References

[1]
Tousignant M, Macoir J, Martel-Sauvageau V, et al. Satisfaction within-home speech telerehabilitation in post-stroke aphasia: an exploratory analysis. J Int Soc Telemed EHealth 2018; 6:e11-1.
[2]
Greener J, Enderby P, Whurr R. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
[3]
Ahmad A, Mozelius P, Ahlin K. Testbed requirements for technology enhanced stroke rehabilitation to support independent living. Eds'Book Testbed Requir Technol Enhanc Stroke Rehabil Support Indep Living'INSTICC Press 2019 Edn.
[4]
Kesav P, Vrinda SL, Sukumaran S, et al. Effectiveness of speech language therapy either alone or with add-on computer-based language therapy software (Malayalam version) for early post stroke aphasia: A feasibility study. J Neurol Sci 2017; 380: 137--141.
[5]
Aftonomos LB, Steele RD, Wertz RT. Promoting recovery in chronic aphasia with an interactive technology. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 841--846.
[6]
Egaji OA, Asghar I, Griffiths M, et al. Digital Speech Therapy for the Aphasia Patients: Challenges, Opportunities and Solutions. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Communication and Management. 2019, pp. 85--88.
[7]
Ahlin K, Ahmad A, Mozelius P. Determining Testbed Requirements for Technology Enhanced Speech Rehabilitation after Stroke-the Informed Co-workers' View Point. In: IARIA GLOBAL HEALTH International Conference on Global Health Challenges. 2019.
[8]
Zhang H, Shen Z, Lin J, et al. Familiarity design in exercise games for elderly. Int J Inf Technol; 22.
[9]
Broeren J, Bjorkdahl A, Claesson L, et al. Virtual rehabilitation after stroke. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008; 136: 77.
[10]
Zhou X, Du M, Zhou L. Use of mobile applications in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil 2018; 25: 489--499.
[11]
Ahmad A, Mozelius P. Critical factors for human computer interaction of ehealth for older adults. In: Proceedings of the 2019 the 5th International Conference on e-Society, e-Learning and e-Technologies. 2019, pp. 58--62.
[12]
Parahoo K. Nursing research: principles, process and issues. Macmillan International Higher Education, 2014.
[13]
Cronin P, Ryan F, Coughlan M. Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. Br J Nurs 2008; 17: 38--43.
[14]
Brocke J vom, Simons A, Niehaves B, et al. Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process.
[15]
Simic T, Leonard C, Laird L, et al. A usability study of internet-based therapy for naming deficits in aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2016; 25: 642--653.
[16]
Roper A, Davey I, Wilson S, et al. Usability Testing-An Aphasia Perspective. In: Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 2018, pp. 102--106.
[17]
Øra HP, Kirmess M, Brady MC, et al. Telerehabilitation for aphasia-protocol of a pragmatic, exploratory, pilot randomized controlled trial. Trials 2018; 19: 208.
[18]
Garcia MB. A Speech Therapy Game Application for Aphasia Patient Neurorehabilitation-A Pilot Study of an mHealth App. Int J Simul Syst Sci Technol; 20.
[19]
Marshall J, Caute A, Chadd K, et al. Technology-enhanced writing therapy for people with aphasia: results of a quasi-randomized waitlist controlled study. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2019; 54: 203--220.
[20]
Mallet K, Shamloul R, Pugliese M, et al. RecoverNow: A patient perspective on the delivery of mobile tablet-based stroke rehabilitation in the acute care setting. Int J Stroke 2019; 14: 174--179.
[21]
Lavoie M, Bier N, Macoir J. Efficacy of a self-administered treatment using a smart tablet to improve functional vocabulary in post-stroke aphasia: a case-series study. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2019; 54: 249--264.
[22]
Wu, D. (2020). Use of an Internet-of-Things Smart Home System for Healthy Aging in Older Adults in Residential Settings: Pilot Feasibility Study. JMIR aging, 3(2), e21964.
[23]
Vaezipour, A., Aldridge, D., Koenig, S., Theodoras, D., & Russell, T. (2021). "It's really exciting to think where it could go": a mixed-method investigation of clinician acceptance, barriers and enablers of virtual reality technology in communication rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1--13.
[24]
Ahmad A, Mozelius P. On the Importance of Tailor-made Speech Relearning Software for Stroke Rehabilitation. In: ICT4AWE 2020. 2020.
[25]
Peek ST, Wouters EJ, Van Hoof J, et al. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inf 2014; 83: 235--248.
[26]
Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, et al. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2018; 24: 4--12.
[27]
Fischer SH, David D, Crotty BH, et al. Acceptance and use of health information technology by community-dwelling elders. Int J Med Inf 2014; 83: 624--635.
[28]
Or CK, Karsh B-T. A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16: 550--560.
[29]
De Vries, L. (2020). Stroke Survivors general use of technical devices in their home environment and likelihood of using a potential digital application in their rehabilitation: A survey following Early Supported Discharge
[30]
Vassli LT, Farshchian BA. Acceptance of health-related ICT among elderly people living in the community: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Int J Human-Computer Interact 2018; 34: 99--116.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Designing and Evaluating IT Applications for Informal Caregivers: Protocol for a Scoping ReviewJMIR Research Protocols10.2196/4765012(e47650)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2023

Index Terms

  1. Factors Influencing Acceptance of Technology-enhanced Speech and Language Relearning for Stroke Survivors -A Systematic Review

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICSLT '21: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on e-Society, e-Learning and e-Technologies
    June 2021
    123 pages
    ISBN:9781450376846
    DOI:10.1145/3477282
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 17 December 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. E-Health
    2. Independent Living
    3. Speech and Language relearning
    4. Stroke Rehabilitation
    5. Tailor-made Software

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICSLT 2021

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Designing and Evaluating IT Applications for Informal Caregivers: Protocol for a Scoping ReviewJMIR Research Protocols10.2196/4765012(e47650)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2023

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media