[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3459637.3482086acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Public Access

Discovering Time-invariant Causal Structure from Temporal Data

Published: 30 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Discovering causal structure from temporal data is an important problem in many fields in science. Existing methods usually suffer from several limitations such as assuming linear dependencies among features, limiting to discrete time series, and/or assuming stationarity, i.e., causal dependencies are repeated with the same time lag and strength at all time points. In this paper, we propose an algorithm called the μ-PC that addresses these limitations. It is based on the theory of μ-separation and extends the well-known PC algorithm to the time domain. To be applicable to both discrete and continuous time series, we develop a conditional independence testing technique for time series by leveraging the Recurrent Marked Temporal Point Process (RMTPP) model. Experiments using both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (rgsp_2333_presentation.mp4)
The presentation is about the paper titled "Discovering Time-invariant Causal Structure from Temporal Data". The discovery of causal relationships from temporal data is a fundamental problem in many fields of science. The existing methods for causal discovery suffer from various limitations, such as assuming linear dependencies among features, limiting to discrete time series, and/or assuming stationarity. In this paper an algorithm is proposed, called the Mu-PC Algorithm, that is based on the Mu-separation criterion, does not assume stationarity, and is applicable to both discrete and continuous time-series data. It is a constraint-based algorithm that uses the Recurrent Marked Temporal Point Process (RMTPP) model for Conditional Independence Testing. The experimental results on both synthetic and real datasets show the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

References

[1]
Sahar Behzadi, Benjamin Schelling, and Claudia Plant. 2020. ITGH: Information-Theoretic Granger Causal Inference on Heterogeneous Data. In Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Springer, 742--755.
[2]
David Bell, Jim Kay, and Jim Malley. 1996. A non-parametric approach to non-linear causality testing. Economics Letters, Vol. 51, 1 (1996), 7--18.
[3]
Debarun Bhattacharjya, Karthikeyan Shanmugam, Tian Gao, and Dharmashankar Subramanian. 2020. Structure Discovery in (Causal) Proximal Graphical Event Models. In Causal Discovery & Causality-Inspired Machine Learning Workshop at Neural Information Processing Systems.
[4]
Debarun Bhattacharjya, Dharmashankar Subramanian, and Tian Gao. 2018. Proximal graphical event models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 31 (2018), 8136--8145.
[5]
Kailash Budhathoki and Jilles Vreeken. 2018. Causal inference on event sequences. In Proceedings of the 2018 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. SIAM, 55--63.
[6]
Yoichi Chikahara and Akinori Fujino. 2018. Causal Inference in Time Series via Supervised Learning. In IJCAI. 2042--2048.
[7]
Diego Colombo, Marloes H Maathuis, Markus Kalisch, and Thomas S Richardson. 2012. Learning high-dimensional directed acyclic graphs with latent and selection variables. The Annals of Statistics (2012), 294--321.
[8]
Vanessa Didelez. 2008. Graphical models for marked point processes based on local independence. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), Vol. 70, 1 (2008), 245--264.
[9]
Nan Du, Hanjun Dai, Rakshit Trivedi, Utkarsh Upadhyay, Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez, and Le Song. 2016. Recurrent marked temporal point processes: Embedding event history to vector. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 1555--1564.
[10]
Michael Eichler. 2012. Graphical modelling of multivariate time series. Probability Theory and Related Fields, Vol. 153, 1--2 (2012), 233--268.
[11]
Clark Glymour, Kun Zhang, and Peter Spirtes. 2019. Review of causal discovery methods based on graphical models. Frontiers in genetics, Vol. 10 (2019), 524.
[12]
Clive WJ Granger. 1969. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society (1969), 424--438.
[13]
Piraporn Jangyodsuk, Dong-Jun Seo, and Jean Gao. 2014. Causal Graph Discovery For Hydrological Time Series Knowledge Discovery. (2014).
[14]
Thuc Le, Tao Hoang, Jiuyong Li, Lin Liu, Huawen Liu, and Shu Hu. 2016. A fast PC algorithm for high dimensional causal discovery with multi-core PCs. IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics (2016).
[15]
Yan Liu, Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil, Aurelie C Lozano, and Yong Lu. 2010. Learning temporal causal graphs for relational time-series analysis. In ICML.
[16]
Helmut Lütkepohl. 2005. New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer Science & Business Media.
[17]
Daniele Marinazzo, Mario Pellicoro, and Sebastiano Stramaglia. 2008. Kernel-Granger causality and the analysis of dynamical networks. Physical review E, Vol. 77, 5 (2008), 056215.
[18]
Christopher Meek. 2014. Toward Learning Graphical and Causal Process Models. In CI@ UAI. 43--48.
[19]
Søren Wengel Mogensen, Niels Richard Hansen, et al. 2020. Markov equivalence of marginalized local independence graphs. The Annals of Statistics, Vol. 48, 1 (2020), 539--559.
[20]
Raha Moraffah, Paras Sheth, Mansooreh Karami, Anchit Bhattacharya, Qianru Wang, Anique Tahir, Adrienne Raglin, and Huan Liu. 2021. Causal Inference for Time series Analysis: Problems, Methods and Evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.05829 (2021).
[21]
Judea Pearl. 2009. Causality. Cambridge university press.
[22]
Christopher J Quinn, Negar Kiyavash, and Todd P Coleman. 2015. Directed information graphs. IEEE Transactions on information theory, Vol. 61, 12 (2015), 6887--6909.
[23]
Jakob Runge. 2018a. Causal network reconstruction from time series: From theoretical assumptions to practical estimation. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, Vol. 28, 7 (2018), 075310.
[24]
Jakob Runge. 2018b. Conditional independence testing based on a nearest-neighbor estimator of conditional mutual information. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. PMLR, 938--947.
[25]
Jakob Runge. 2020. Discovering contemporaneous and lagged causal relations in autocorrelated nonlinear time series datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.03685 (2020).
[26]
Peter Spirtes, Clark N Glymour, Richard Scheines, and David Heckerman. 2000. Causation, prediction, and search. MIT press.
[27]
Xiaohai Sun. 2008. Assessing nonlinear Granger causality from multivariate time series. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer, 440--455.
[28]
Alex Tank, Ian Covert, Nicholas Foti, Ali Shojaie, and Emily Fox. 2018. Neural granger causality for nonlinear time series. stat, Vol. 1050 (2018), 16.
[29]
Matthew J Vowels, Necati Cihan Camgoz, and Richard Bowden. 2021. D'ya like DAGs? A Survey on Structure Learning and Causal Discovery. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.02582 (2021).
[30]
Wei Zhang, Thomas Panum, Somesh Jha, Prasad Chalasani, and David Page. 2020. Cause: Learning granger causality from event sequences using attribution methods. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 11235--11245.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Causal Discovery from Temporal Data: An Overview and New PerspectivesACM Computing Surveys10.1145/370529757:4(1-38)Online publication date: 23-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Time Series Causal Discovery Using a Hybrid Method2024 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData)10.1109/BigData62323.2024.10825912(8208-8210)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2024
  • (2023)Neural Time-Invariant Causal Discovery from Time Series Data2023 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)10.1109/IJCNN54540.2023.10192004(1-8)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2023

Index Terms

  1. Discovering Time-invariant Causal Structure from Temporal Data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CIKM '21: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management
    October 2021
    4966 pages
    ISBN:9781450384469
    DOI:10.1145/3459637
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 30 October 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. causal discovery
    2. directed graph
    3. mu-separation
    4. recurrent neural network
    5. temporal data

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    CIKM '21
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

    Upcoming Conference

    CIKM '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)188
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26
    Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Causal Discovery from Temporal Data: An Overview and New PerspectivesACM Computing Surveys10.1145/370529757:4(1-38)Online publication date: 23-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Time Series Causal Discovery Using a Hybrid Method2024 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData)10.1109/BigData62323.2024.10825912(8208-8210)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2024
    • (2023)Neural Time-Invariant Causal Discovery from Time Series Data2023 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)10.1109/IJCNN54540.2023.10192004(1-8)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2023

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media