[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

The Intersection of Being Black and Being a Woman: Examining the Effect of Social Computing Relationships on Computer Science Career Choice

Published: 24 February 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Computer science (CS) has been identified as one of the fastest-growing professions, with demand for CS professionals far outpacing the supply of CS graduates. The necessity for a trained CS workforce has compelled industry and academia to evaluate strategies for broadening participation in CS. The current literature in CS education emphasizes the importance of social relationships and supports for individuals from underrepresented groups. Unfortunately, this literature has largely been limited to either the exploration of issues of women or that of underrepresented racial/ethnic groups. These limited views generalize characteristics of specific underrepresented groups without considering intersections between these groups. This quantitative study (n = 3,206) addressed that shortcoming by leveraging inferential statistical methods to examine (i) the similarities and differences between the social CS-related experiences of Black women, Black men, and non-Black women in the United States; (ii) the relationship between these experiences and CS career choices; and (iii) the activities during which significant social experiences might occur. The results indicate that Black women's social experiences are often different from the experiences of both Black men and non-Black women. In particular, both Black men and non-Black women had more CS friends than Black women, whereas having these friends was more significant for the CS career choice for Black women. Introductions to CS in school, before college, were negatively related to career choice for all groups, whereas home support was positive for both Black women and men. This work suggests that considering intersectionality is important to understanding the needs of different individuals, as well as the importance of social supports for persistence in CS.

References

[1]
AAUW. 2015. Solving the Equation: The Variables for Women's Success in Engineering and Computing. Retrieved January 24, 2020 from https://www.aauw.org/research/solving-the-equation/.
[2]
S. Beyer. 2014. Why are women underrepresented in computer science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades. Computer Science Education 24, 2--3 (2014), 153--192. http://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2014.963363.
[3]
M. F. Belenky, B. M. Clinchy, N. R. Goldberger, and J. M. Tarule. 1997. Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind (10th anniv. ed.). Perseus Books Group, New York, NY.
[4]
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, Computer and Information Research Scientists, on the Internet at https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/computer-and-information-research-scientists.htm (visited January 23, 2020).
[5]
S. Cheryan, V. C. Plaut, P. G. Davies, and C. M. Steele. 2009. Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 6 (2009), 1045--1060. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0016239.
[6]
K. Crenshaw. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. In Feminist Legal Theory: Readings in Law and Gender, K. Bartlett and R. Kennedy (Eds.). Routledge, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, 139--168.
[7]
R. Delgado and J. Stefancic. 2001. Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. New York University Press, New York, NY.
[8]
J. Denner, E. Way, G. Suite, and L. Werner. 2015. Does gender matter? Women talk about being female in college computing classes. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on GenderIT (GenderIT’15). 44--48. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2807565.2807712.
[9]
W. M. DuBow, I. Vakalis, M. A. Perez-Quinones, and J. T. Black. 2013. Growing female undergraduate enrollments in computer science. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’13). 377. http://doi.org/10.1145/2445196.2445306.
[10]
K. A. Frenkel. 1990. Women and computing. Communications of the ACM 33, 11 (1990), 34--46.
[11]
C. Frieze and J. Quesenberry. 2015. Kicking Butt in Computer Science: Women in Computing at Carnegie Mellon University. Dog Ear Publishing, Indianapolis, IN.
[12]
R. Gillet. 2016. The 25 highest-paying jobs you can get with a bachelor's degree. Business Insider. Retrieved January 24, 2020 from https://www.businessinsider.com/highest-paying-jobs-that-only-require-a-bachelors-degree-2016-6.
[13]
Girl Scout Research Institute. 2012. Generation STEM: What Girls Say About Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math. Retrieved January 24, 2020 from https://www.girlscouts.org/content/dam/girlscouts-gsusa/forms-and-documents/about-girl-scouts/research/generation_stem_full_report.pdf.
[14]
J. Goode, R. Estrella, and J. Margolis. 2006. Lost in translation: Gender and high school computer science. In Women and Information Technology, J. M. Cohoon and W. Aspray (Eds.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 89--114.
[15]
Google. 2014. Women Who Choose Computer Science—What Really Matters: The Critical Role of Encouragement and Exposure. Retrieved January 24, 2020 from https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/edu.google.com/en//pdfs/women-who-choose-what-really.pdf.
[16]
M. Hinton. 2016. Big racial, gender gaps seen in computer science education. Education Week. Retrieved January 24, 2020 from https://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/curriculum/2016/10/big_racial_gender_gaps_seen_in_computer_science_education.html.
[17]
S. Hug and A. S. Jurow. 2013. Learning together or going it alone: How community contexts shape the identity development of minority women in computing. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 19, 4 (2013), 273--292. http://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2013005778.
[18]
S. M. Malcom, P. Q. Hall, and J. W. Brown. 1976. The Double Bind: The Price of Being a Minority Woman in Science. Retrieved January 24, 2020 from http://web.mit.edu/cortiz/www/Diversity/1975-DoubleBind.pdf.
[19]
J. Margolis, A. Fisher, and F. Miller. 2002. The anatomy of interest: Women in undergraduate computer science. Women's Studies Quarterly 28 (spring/summer 2002), 104--127.
[20]
J. Margolis and A. Fisher. 2003. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[21]
S. McBride. 2015. Computer Science Now Top Major for Women at Stanford University. Retrieved January 24, 2020 from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-women-technology-stanford-idUSKCN0S32F020151009.
[22]
L. Barker and J. McGrath Cohoon. 2010. Harvey Mudd College's Successful Systemic Approach (Case Study 2). Retrieved January 24, 2020 from https://www.ncwit.org/resources/how-does-engaging-curriculum-attract-students-computing/harvey-mudd-college's-successful.
[23]
M. Ong, C. Wright, L. L. Espinosa, and G. Orfield. 2011. Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review 81, 2 (2011) 172--209.
[24]
K. A. Scott, K. M. Sheridan, and K. Clark. 2017. Culturally responsive computing: A theory revisited. Learning, Media and Technology 40, 4 (2017), 412--436. http://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.924966
[25]
K. A. Scott and M. A. White. 2013. COMPUGIRLS’ Standpoint: Culturally Responsive Computing and Its Effect on Girls of Color. Retrieved January 24, 2020 from https://asu.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/compugirls-standpoint-culturally-responsive-computing-and-its-eff.
[26]
U.S. Census Bureau. 2013. Disparities in STEM Employment by Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin: American Community Survey Reports. Retrieved February 4, 2020 from https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2013/acs/acs-24.html.
[27]
U.S. Department of Labor. 2013. The Economic Status of Women of Color: A Snapshot. Retrieved January 24, 2020 from https://www.dol.gov/wb/media/Economic_Status_Women_of_Color.pdf.
[28]
R. Varma. 2007. Decoding the female exodus from computing education. Information, Communication 8 Society 10, 2 (2007), 181--193.
[29]
I. Vekiri and A. Chronaki. 2008. Gender issues in technology use: Perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school. Computers and Education 51, 3 (2008), 1392--1404. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.01.003.
[30]
A. Vitores and A. Gil-Juárez. 2016. The trouble with “women in computing”: A critical examination of the deployment of research on the gender gap in computer science. Journal of Gender Studies, 9236 (2016), 1--15. http://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2015.1087309.
[31]
N. R. Zarrett and O. Malanchuk. 2005. Who's computing? Gender and race differences in young adults’ decisions to pursue an information technology career. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 2005 (2005), 110, 65--84.
[32]
E. Smith. 2008. Using Secondary Data in Educational and Social Research. McGraw-Hill Education.
[33]
C. Chen, P. Haduong, K. Brennan, G. Sonnert, and P. Sadler. 2019. The effects of first programming language on college students’ computing attitude and achievement: A comparison of graphical and textual languages. Computer Science Education 29, 1 (2019), 1--26.
[34]
C. Chen, S. Jeckel, G. Sonnert, and P. M. Sadler. 2019. “Cowboy” and “Cowgirl” programming and success in college computer science. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 2, 4 (2019), 1--12.
[35]
J. D. Cribbs, Z. Hazari, G. Sonnert, and P. M. Sadler. 2015. Establishing an explanatory model for mathematics identity. Child Development 86, 4 (2015), 1048--1062.
[36]
Z. Hazari, R. H. Tai, and P. M. Sadler. 2007. Gender differences in introductory university physics performance: The influence of high school physics preparation and affective factors. Science Education 91, 6 (2007), 847--876.
[37]
M. Ross, B. Capobianco, and A. Godwin. 2017. Repositioning race, gender, and role identity formation for Black women in engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 23, 1 (2017), 37--52.
[38]
D. Stoilescu and D. McDougall. 2011. Gender digital divide and challenges in undergraduate computer science programs. Canadian Journal of Education 34, 1 (2011), 308--333.
[39]
M. Giannakos, I. Pappas, L. Jaccheri, and D. Sampson. 2016. Understanding student retention in computer science education: The role of environment, gains, barriers, and usefulness. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 5 (2016), 2365--2382.
[40]
V. Tinto. 1988. Stages of student departure reflections character of student leaving. Journal of Higher Education 59, 4 (1988), 438--455.
[41]
B. F. French, J. C. Immekus, and W. C. Oakes. 2005. An examination of indicators of engineering students’ success and persistence. Journal of Engineering Education 94 (2005), 419--425.
[42]
G. S. May and D. E. Chubin. 2003. A retrospective on undergraduate engineering success for underrepresented. Journal of Engineering Education 92, 1 (2003), 27--39.
[43]
R. Revelo Alonso. 2014. Engineering familia: The role of a professional organization in the development of engineering identities of Latina/o undergraduates. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS’14).
[44]
V. A. Haines, J. E. Wallace, and M. E. Cannon. 2001. Exploring the gender gap in engineering: A re-specification and test of the hypothesis of cumulative advantages and disadvantages. Journal of Engineering Education 90, 4 (2001), 677--684.
[45]
A. Datnow and R. Cooper. 1997. Peer networks of African American students in independent schools: Affirming academic success and racial identity. Journal of Negro Education 66, 1 (1997), 56--72.
[46]
V. Tinto. 1998. Colleges as communities: Taking research on student persistence seriously. Review of Higher Education 21, 2 (1998), 167--177.
[47]
J. Micomonaco and J. Sticklen. 2010. Toward a better understanding of academic and social integration: A qualitative study of factors related to persistence in engineering. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Conference and Exposition. https://peer.asee.org/16543.
[48]
K. Beddoes and M. Borrego. 2011. Feminist theory in three engineering education journals: 1995--2008. Journal of Engineering Education 100, 2 (2011), 281--303.
[49]
P. H. Collins and S. Bilge. 2016. Intersectionality. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
[50]
P. H. Collins. 2000. Black Feminist Thought. Routledge, New York, NY.
[51]
T. Zuberi and E. Bonilla-Silva. 2008. White Logic, White Methods: Racism and Methodology. Rowman 8 Littlefield, Lanham, MD.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. The Intersection of Being Black and Being a Woman: Examining the Effect of Social Computing Relationships on Computer Science Career Choice

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Computing Education
    ACM Transactions on Computing Education  Volume 20, Issue 2
    June 2020
    174 pages
    EISSN:1946-6226
    DOI:10.1145/3382496
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 February 2020
    Accepted: 01 December 2019
    Revised: 01 November 2019
    Received: 01 March 2018
    Published in TOCE Volume 20, Issue 2

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Race
    2. ethnicity
    3. gender
    4. intersectionality

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Funding Sources

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)751
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)78
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)“Hidden” No More: Newspapers’ Framing of NASA Mathematician Katherine JohnsonJournal of Black Studies10.1177/0021934723122574655:4(310-328)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Neurodivergent Legitimacy in Computing SpacesACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/369065124:4(1-28)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Recruiting Practices in Informal CS LearningACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/368882924:4(1-29)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2024
    • (2024)How Do You Solve A Problem Like Recruitment? On The Hiring and Retention of Computing AcademicsProceedings of the 2024 on ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference V. 110.1145/3649165.3703622(263-266)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2024
    • (2024)Perpetual Teaching Across Temporary Places: Conditions, Motivations, and Practices of Media Artists Teaching Computing WorkshopsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671095(374-388)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
    • (2024)The Choice is Yours: Intersectional Studies versus Studies of Intersectional Populations in Computing Education ResearchProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630942(1098-1104)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Intersectional Biases Within an Introductory Computing AssessmentProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630882(1021-1027)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Collecting, Analyzing, and Acting on Intersectional, Longitudinal Data and Pass/Fail/Withdraw Rates in Computing CoursesProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630806(909-915)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Challenging Normalized Gendered Racism in Departmental Efforts to Broaden Participation in Computer ScienceJournal of Women and Gender in Higher Education10.1080/26379112.2024.237347917:4(357-379)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2024
    • (2024)Shrinking gender gaps in STEM persistence: a ten-year comparison of the stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school by genderInternational Journal of Science Education10.1080/09500693.2024.2388880(1-21)Online publication date: 15-Aug-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Login options

    Full Access

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media