More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Gendered by Design: A Duoethnographic Study of Personal Fitness Tracking Systems

Authors:

Patricia GarciaAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Social Computing, Volume 2, Issue 4

Article No.: 15, Pages 1 - 22

https://doi.org/10.1145/3364685

Published: 09 January 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Using fitness trackers to generate and collect quantifiable data is a widespread practice aimed at better understanding one’s health and body. The intentional design of fitness trackers as genderless or universal is predicated on masculinist design values and assumptions that do not result in “neutral” devices and systems. Instead, ignoring gender in the design of fitness tracking devices marks a dangerous ongoing inattention to the needs, desires, and experiences of women, as well as transgender and gender non-conforming persons. We utilize duoethnography, a methodology emphasizing personal narrative and dialogue, as a tool that promotes feminist reflexivity in the design and study of fitness tracking technologies. Using the Jawbone UP3 as our object of study, we present findings that illustrate the gendered physical and interface design features and discuss how these features reproduce narrow understandings of gender, health, and lived experiences.

References

[1]

Teresa Almeida, Rob Comber, and Madeline Balaam. 2016. HCI and intimate care as an agenda for change in women’s health. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 2599--2611.

Digital Library

[2]

Madeline Balaam, Lone Koefoed Hansen, Catherine D’Ignazio, Emma Simpson, Teresa Almeida, Stacey Kuznetsov, Mike Catt, and Marie L. J. Søndergaard. 2017. Hacking women’s health. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’17). ACM Press, Denver, Colorado, 476--483.

[3]

Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, Amanda Lazar, and Norman Makoto Su. 2019. (Re-)framing menopause experiences for HCI and design. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’19). ACM Press, Glasgow, Scotland, 1--13.

Digital Library

[4]

Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: Taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’10). ACM, New York, NY, 1301--1310.

Digital Library

[5]

Shaowen Bardzell and Elizabeth F. Churchill. 2011. IwC special issue “Feminism and HCI: New perspectives” Special Issue Editors’ introduction. Interact. Comput. 23, 5 (2011), iii--xi.

Digital Library

[6]

Genevieve Bell, Mark Blythe, and Phoebe Sengers. 2005. Making by making strange: Defamiliarization and the design of domestic technologies. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 12, 2 (June 2005), 149--173.

Digital Library

[7]

Anne-Jorunn Berg and Merete Lie. 1995. Feminism and constructivism: Do artifacts have gender? Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 20, 3 (July 1995), 332--351.

[8]

Rena Bivens and Oliver L. Haimson. 2016. Baking gender into social media design: How platforms shape categories for users and advertisers. Social Media Soc. 2, 4 (Nov. 2016), 205630511667248.

[9]

Susanne Bødker. 2015. Third-wave HCI, 10 years later—Participation and sharing. Interactions 22, 5 (2015), 24--31.

Digital Library

[10]

Geoffrey C. Bowker and Susan Leigh Star. 2000. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. MIT Press.

[11]

Richard E. Boyatzis. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. SAGE.

[12]

Rick A. Breault. 2016. Emerging issues in duoethnography. Int. J. Qual. Studies Edu. 29, 6 (July 2016), 777--794.

[13]

Samantha Breslin and Bimlesh Wadhwa. 2017. Gender and human-computer interaction. In The Wiley Handbook of Human Computer Interaction. Wiley-Blackwell, 71--87.

[14]

Laura J. Burton. 2015. Underrepresentation of women in sport leadership: A review of research. Sport Manage. Rev. 18, 2 (May 2015), 155--165.

[15]

Judith Butler. 2006. Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. In The RoutledgeFalmer Reader in Gender 8 Education. Routledge, 73--83.

[16]

Nadia Campo Woytuk, Linette Nilsson, and Mingxing Liu. 2019. Your period rules: Design implications for period-positive technologies. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Extended Abstracts (CHI EA’19). ACM Press, Glasgow, Scotland, 1--6.

[17]

Meredith A. Case, Holland A. Burwick, Kevin G. Volpp, and Mitesh S. Patel. 2015. Accuracy of smartphone applications and wearable devices for tracking physical activity data. J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 313, 6 (Feb. 2015), 625--626.

[18]

James Clawson, Jessica A. Pater, Andrew D. Miller, Elizabeth D. Mynatt, and Lena Mamykina. 2015. No longer wearing: Investigating the abandonment of personal health-tracking technologies on craigslist. In Proceedings of the ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’15). ACM, New York, NY, 647--658.

Digital Library

[19]

Patricia Collins, Amy McLaughlin, Elizabeth Higginbotham, Debra Henderson, Ann Tickamyer, Victoria-Maria MacDonald, Mary Gatta, Tiffany Manuel, Avis Jones-Deweever, Sanford Schram et al. 2009. Emerging Intersections: Race, Class, and Gender in Theory, Policy, and Practice. Rutgers University Press.

[20]

Patricia Hill Collins. 2002. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Routledge.

[21]

Flora Cornish, Alex Gillespie, and Tania Zittoun. 2013. Collaborative analysis of qualitative data. In Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, Uwe Flick (Ed.). Sage, London, 79--93. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n6

[22]

Mayara Costa Figueiredo, Clara Caldeira, Tera L. Reynolds, Sean Victory, Kai Zheng, and Yunan Chen. 2017. Self-tracking for fertility care: Collaborative support for a highly personalized problem. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1 (Dec. 2017), 1--21.

Digital Library

[23]

Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2018. Design Justice: Towards an Intersectional Feminist Framework for Design Theory and Practice. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3189696. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3189696.

[24]

Kimberle Crenshaw. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. Univ. Chi. Legal Forum 1989, 1, Article 8 (1989). http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8.

[25]

Kimberle Crenshaw. 1990. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Rev. 43 (1990), 1241.

[26]

Majid Dadgar and Kshiti D. Joshi. 2018. The role of information and communication technology in self-management of chronic diseases: An empirical investigation through value sensitive design. J. Assoc. Info. Syst. 19, 2 (2018), 2.

[27]

Catherine D’Ignazio, Alexis Hope, Becky Michelson, Robyn Churchill, and Ethan Zuckerman. 2016. A feminist HCI approach to designing postpartum technologies: “When I First Saw a Breast Pump I Was Wondering if It Was a Joke.” In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 2612--2622.

Digital Library

[28]

Jill P. Dimond, Casey Fiesler, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2011. Domestic violence and information communication technologies. Interact. Comput. 23, 5 (Sept. 2011), 413--421.

Digital Library

[29]

Brian Dolan. 2014. Fitbit, Jawbone, Nike had 97 percent of fitness tracker retail sales in 2013. Retrieved from http://mobihealthnews.com/28825/fitbit-jawbone-nike-had-97-percent-of-fi.

[30]

Susan M. Dray, Andrea Peer, Anke M. Brock, Anicia Peters, Shaowen Bardzell, Margaret Burnett, Elizabeth Churchill, Erika Poole, and Daniela K. Busse. 2013. Exploring the representation of women perspectives in technologies. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Extended Abstracts (CHI EA’13). ACM, New York, NY, 2447--2454.

[31]

Eric Elenko, Lindsay Underwood, and Daphne Zohar. 2015. Defining digital medicine. Nature Biotechnol. 33, 5 (May 2015), 456--461.

[32]

Daniel A. Epstein, Nicole B. Lee, Jennifer H. Kang, Elena Agapie, Jessica Schroeder, Laura R. Pina, James Fogarty, Julie A. Kientz, and Sean Munson. 2017. Examining menstrual tracking to inform the design of personal informatics tools. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’17). ACM, New York, NY, 6876--6888.

Digital Library

[33]

Casey Fiesler, Shannon Morrison, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2016. An archive of their own: A case study of feminist hci and values in design. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 2574--2585.

[34]

Linda Flanagan. 2017. The field where men still call the shots. The Atlantic (July 2017). Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2017/07/the-field-where-men-still-call-the-shots/535167/.

[35]

Margaret Flemings, Shanzay Kazmi, Rachel Pak, and Orit Shaer. 2018. Crimson wave: Shedding light on menstrual health. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI’18). ACM Press, Stockholm, Sweden, 343--348.

Digital Library

[36]

Susannah Fox and Maeve Duggan. 2013. Tracking for Health. Pew Research Center’s Internet 8 American Life Project.

[37]

Batya Friedman, Peter H. Kahn, and Alan Borning. 2008. Value sensitive design and information systems. The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, Kenneth Einar Himma and Herman T. Tavani (Eds). John Wiley and Sons, 69--101.

[38]

Batya Friedman, Peter H. Kahn, Jr., Jennifer Hagman, Rachel L. Severson, and Brian Gill. 2008. The watcher and the watched: Social judgments about privacy in a public place. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 21, 2 (May 2008), 235--272.

[39]

Katie Gambier-Ross, David J. McLernon, and Heather M. Morgan. 2018. A mixed methods exploratory study of women’s relationships with and uses of fertility tracking apps. Dig. Health 4 (Jan. 2018), 205520761878507.

[40]

Cally Gatehouse. 2016. Feral screens: Queering urban networked publics. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS’16). ACM, New York, NY, 99--104.

Digital Library

[41]

Nanna Gorm and Irina Shklovski. 2016. Steps, choices and moral accounting: Observations from a step-counting campaign in the workplace. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW’16). ACM, New York, NY, 148--159.

Digital Library

[42]

Eileen Green. 1993. Gendered Design?: Information Technology and Office Systems. CRC Press.

[43]

Xinning Gui, Yu Chen, Yubo Kou, Katie Pine, and Yunan Chen. 2017. Investigating support seeking from peers for pregnancy in online health communities. Proc. ACM Human-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW (Dec. 2017), 1--19.

Digital Library

[44]

Oliver L. Haimson. 2017. The social complexities of transgender identity disclosure on social network sites. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’17). ACM, New York, NY, 280--285.

Digital Library

[45]

Sandra Harding. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women’s Lives. Cornell University Press.

[46]

Sandra G. Harding. 2004. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. Psychology Press.

[47]

Jean Hardy and Silvia Lindtner. 2017. Constructing a desiring user: Discourse, rurality, and design in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW’17). ACM, New York, NY, 13--25.

Digital Library

[48]

Steve Harrison, Phoebe Sengers, and Deborah Tatar. 2011. Making epistemological trouble: Third-paradigm HCI as successor science. Interact. Comput. 23, 5 (Sept. 2011), 385--392.

Digital Library

[49]

Eiji Hayashi and Jason Hong. 2011. A diary study of password usage in daily life. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). ACM, New York, NY, 2627--2630.

Digital Library

[50]

Sarah Homewood. 2018. Designing for the changing body: A feminist exploration of self-tracking technologies. In Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’18). ACM Press, Montreal QC, Canada, 1--4.

Digital Library

[51]

M. Francyne Huckaby and Molly H. Weinburgh. 2015. “Spark Like a Dialectic”: Difference in-between feminisms/duoethnography. Int. Rev. Qual. Res. 8, 1 (Feb. 2015), 49--67.

[52]

Gregory Sean Hummel and Satoshi Toyosaki. 2015. Duoethnography as relational whiteness pedagogy: Human orientation toward critical cultural labor. Int. Rev. Qual. Res. 8, 1 (Feb. 2015), 27--48.

[53]

Gopinaath Kannabiran, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2011. How HCI talks about sexuality: Discursive strategies, blind spots, and opportunities for future research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). ACM, New York, NY, 695--704.

Digital Library

[54]

Amanda Lazar, Norman Makoto Su, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2019. Parting the red sea: Sociotechnical systems and lived experiences of menopause. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’19). ACM Press, Glasgow, Scotland, 1--16.

Digital Library

[55]

Ann Light. 2011. HCI as heterodoxy: Technologies of identity and the queering of interaction with computers. Interact. Comput. 23, 5 (Sept. 2011), 430--438.

Digital Library

[56]

Deborah Lupton. 1995. The Imperative of Health: Public Health and the Regulated Body. Vol. 90. Taylor 8 Francis. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09581599708409082.

[57]

Deborah Lupton. 2014. Self-tracking cultures: Towards a sociology of personal informatics. In Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: The Future of Design (OzCHI’14). ACM, New York, NY, 77--86.

Digital Library

[58]

D. Lupton. 2015. The cultural specificity of digital health technologies. Retrieved from https://simplysociology.wordpress.com/2015/01/25/the-cultural-specificity-of-digital-health-technologies/.

[59]

S. Magnet. 2011. When Biometrics Fail: Gender, Race, and the Technology of Identity. Duke University Press, Durham.

[60]

Susan Markens. 2016. Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). In The Wiley Blackwell Encycopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies.

[61]

Muriel Niederle and Lise Vesterlund. 2011. Gender and competition. Ann. Rev. Econ. 3, 1 (Sept. 2011), 601--630.

[62]

Joe Norris. 2008. Duoethnography. SAGE Encyc. Qual. Res. Methods 1 (2008), 233--236.

[63]

Joe Norris. 2012. Duoethnography: Dialogic Methods for Social, Health, and Educational Research. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.

[64]

NPD Connected Intelligence Group. 2015. Consumers 8 Wearables. Technical Report. Retrieved from http://www.connected-intelligence.com/our-research/wear.

[65]

Nelly Oudshoorn, Ann Rudinow Saetnan, and Merete Lie. 2002. On gender and things: Reflections on an exhibition on gendered artifacts. Women’s Studies Int. Forum 25, 4 (July 2002), 471--483.

[66]

Kunwoo Park, Ingmar Weber, Meeyoung Cha, and Chul Lee. 2016. Persistent sharing of fitness app status on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW’16). ACM, New York, NY, 184--194.

Digital Library

[67]

Greig Paul and James Irvine. 2014. Privacy implications of wearable health devices. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Security of Information and Networks (SIN’14). ACM, New York, NY, 117:117--117:121.

Digital Library

[68]

Aditya Pawar and Johan Redström. 2016. Publics, participation and the making of Umeå pantry. Int. J. Design 10, 1 (2016), 73--84.

[69]

Tamara Peyton, Erika Poole, Madhu Reddy, Jennifer Kraschnewski, and Cynthia Chuang. 2014. ”Every pregnancy is different”: Designing mHealth for the pregnancy ecology. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS’14). ACM Press, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 577--586.

Digital Library

[70]

Stephen Purpura, Victoria Schwanda, Kaiton Williams, William Stubler, and Phoebe Sengers. 2011. Fit4Life: The design of a persuasive technology promoting healthy behavior and ideal weight. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). ACM, New York, NY, 423--432.

Digital Library

[71]

Jennifer A. Rode. 2011. A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI. Interact. Comput. 23, 5 (Sept. 2011), 393--400.

Digital Library

[72]

Rachel Sanders. 2017. Self-tracking in the digital era: Biopower, patriarchy, and the new biometric body projects. Body Soc. 23, 1 (Mar. 2017), 36--63.

[73]

Richard Sawyer and Joe Norris. 2015. Duoethnography: A retrospective 10 years after. Int. Rev. Qual. Res. 8, 1 (Feb. 2015), 1--4.

[74]

Richard D. Sawyer and Tonda Liggett. 2012. Shifting positionalities: A critical discussion of a duoethnographic inquiry of a personal curriculum of post/colonialism. Int. J. Qual. Methods 11, 5 (Dec. 2012), 628--651.

[75]

Richard D. Sawyer and Joe Norris. 2012. Duoethnography (1st ed.). Oxford University Press, New York.

[76]

Ari Schlesinger, W. Keith Edwards, and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2017. Intersectional HCI: Engaging identity through gender, race, and class. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’17). ACM, New York, NY, 5412--5427.

[77]

Shubham Sharma. 2019. Best Fitness Tracker For Women In January 2019: Best Activity Trackers. Retrieved from https://technosoups.com/best-fitness-tracker-for-women/.

[78]

Tamar Sharon. 2017. Self-tracking for health and the quantified self: Re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. Philos. Technol. 30, 1 (Mar. 2017), 93--121.

[79]

Irina Shklovski, Janet Vertesi, Emily Troshynski, and Paul Dourish. 2009. The commodification of location: Dynamics of power in location-based systems. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’09). ACM, New York, NY, 11--20.

Digital Library

[80]

Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard and Lone Koefoed Hansen. 2016. PeriodShare: A bloody design fiction. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI’16). ACM Press, Gothenburg, Sweden, 1--6.

Digital Library

[81]

Matthias Sutter and Daniela Glätzle-Rützler. 2015. Gender differences in the willingness to compete emerge early in life and persist. Manage. Sci. 61, 10 (Oct. 2015), 2339--2354.

[82]

Nancy A. Van House. 2011. Feminist HCI meets Facebook: Performativity and social networking sites. Interact. Comput. 23, 5 (Sept. 2011), 422--429.

Digital Library

[83]

Chelsea-Joy Wardle, Mitchell Green, Christine Wanjiru Mburu, and Melissa Densmore. 2018. Exploring co-design with breastfeeding mothers. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’18). ACM Press, Montreal QC, Canada, 1--12.

Digital Library

[84]

Elizabeth Wissinger. 2017. From “Geek” to “Chic”: Wearable technology and the woman question. In Digital Sociologies. Policy Press, Bristol, UK, 269--287.

[85]

Patricia Garcia and Marika Cifor. 2019. Expanding our reflexive toolbox: Collaborative possibilities for examining socio-technical systems using duoethnography. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW, Article 190 (2019).

Digital Library

Cited By

Salehzadeh Niksirat KVelykoivanenko LZufferey NCherubini MHuguenin KHumbert M(2024)Wearable Activity Trackers: A Survey on Utility, Privacy, and SecurityACM Computing Surveys10.1145/364509156:7(1-40)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3645091
Spors VFlintham MBrundell PMurphy D(2023)Care-full data, care-less systems: making sense of self-care technologies for mental health with humanistic practitioners in the United KingdomFrontiers in Computer Science10.3389/fcomp.2023.12302845Online publication date: 22-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1230284
Biruk C(2023)Trans Embodiment, Fitness Wearables and the Queer Pleasures of DataficationBody & Society10.1177/1357034X231216866Online publication date: 28-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X231216866
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Gendered by Design: A Duoethnographic Study of Personal Fitness Tracking Systems
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing
    1. Collaborative and social computing design and evaluation methods
      1. Ethnographic studies
2. Social and professional topics
  1. User characteristics
    1. Gender
      1. Women

Recommendations

Examining Menstrual Tracking to Inform the Design of Personal Informatics Tools
CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

We consider why and how women track their menstrual cycles, examining their experiences to uncover design opportunities and extend the field's understanding of personal informatics tools. To understand menstrual cycle tracking practices, we collected ...
Reimagining (Women’s) Health: HCI, Gender and Essentialised Embodiment
Special Issue on HCI and the Body:?Reimagining Women's Health and Regular Papers

An ever-increasing body of work within HCI investigates questions of around “Women’s Health” with the aim to disrupt the status quo of defaulting to an implicit norm of cis-male bodies. This laudable and feminist project has the potential to drastically ...
Living with Uncertainty and Stigma: Self-Experimentation and Support-Seeking around Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is a condition that causes hormonal imbalance and infertility in women and people with female reproductive organs. PCOS causes different symptoms for different people, with no singular or universal cure. Being a ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Social Computing

ACM Transactions on Social Computing Volume 2, Issue 4

Special Issue on HICSS 2019

December 2019

82 pages

EISSN:2469-7826

DOI:10.1145/3375996

Editor:
Kevin Crowston
Syracuse University, USA

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 January 2020

Accepted: 01 September 2019

Revised: 01 August 2019

Received: 01 January 2019

Published in TSC Volume 2, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed

Funding Sources

Arizona State University Program for Transborder Communities

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

23
Total Citations
View Citations
1,048
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)167
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)31

Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Salehzadeh Niksirat KVelykoivanenko LZufferey NCherubini MHuguenin KHumbert M(2024)Wearable Activity Trackers: A Survey on Utility, Privacy, and SecurityACM Computing Surveys10.1145/364509156:7(1-40)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3645091
Spors VFlintham MBrundell PMurphy D(2023)Care-full data, care-less systems: making sense of self-care technologies for mental health with humanistic practitioners in the United KingdomFrontiers in Computer Science10.3389/fcomp.2023.12302845Online publication date: 22-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1230284
Biruk C(2023)Trans Embodiment, Fitness Wearables and the Queer Pleasures of DataficationBody & Society10.1177/1357034X231216866Online publication date: 28-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X231216866
Oleson ASolomon MPerdriau CKo A(2023)Teaching Inclusive Design Skills with the CIDER Assumption Elicitation TechniqueACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/354907430:1(1-49)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3549074
Chuanromanee TMetoyer R(2023)Understanding Gender Transition Tracking Habits and TechnologyProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581554(1-16)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581554
Wilcox LShelby RVeeraraghavan RHaimson OErickson GTurken MGulotta R(2023)Infrastructuring Care: How Trans and Non-Binary People Meet Health and Well-Being Needs through TechnologyProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581040(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581040
Núñez-Pacheco CFrid E(2023)Sharing Earthquake Narratives: Making Space for Others in our Autobiographical Design ProcessProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580977(1-18)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3580977
Kinnee BDesjardins ARosner D(2023)Autospeculation: Reflecting on the Intimate and Imaginative Capacities of Data AnalysisProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580902(1-10)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3580902
Gaver WGaver F(2023)Living with Light TouchProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580807(1-14)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3580807
Hokka J(2023)Gender and the Diversity of the Human Body as Challenges for the Inclusive Design of Wearable TechnologyFashion Practice10.1080/17569370.2023.2250153(1-26)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2023.2250153
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents