[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3343031.3356083acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The ACM Multimedia 2019 Live Video Streaming Grand Challenge

Published: 15 October 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Live video streaming delivery over Dynamic Adaptive Video Streaming (DASH) is challenging as it requires low end-to-end latency, is more prone to stall, and the receiver has to decide online which representation at which bitrate to download and whether to adjust the playback speed to control the latency. To encourage the research community to come together to address this challenge, we organize the Live Video Streaming Grand Challenge at ACM Multimedia 2019. This grand challenge provides a simulation platform onto which the participants can implement their adaptive bitrate (ABR) logic and latency control algorithm, and then benchmark against each other using a common set of video traces and network traces. The ABR algorithms are evaluated using a common Quality-of- Experience (QoE) model that accounts for playback bitrate, latency constraint, frame-skipping penalty, and rebuffering penalty.

References

[1]
2018.Information technology - Multimedia application format (MPEG-A) Part 19:Common media application format (CMAF) for segmented media. Standard ISO/IEC23000-19:2018. International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, CH. https://www.iso.org/standard/71975.html
[2]
Akamai. 2016. dash.js. https://github.com/Dash- Industry- Forum/dash.js/
[3]
Abdelhak Bentaleb, Christian Timmerer, Ali C. Begen, and Roger Zimmermann. 2019. Bandwidth Prediction in Low-latency Chunked Streaming. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video (NOSSDAV '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3304112.3325611
[4]
Florin Dobrian, Vyas Sekar, Asad Awan, Ion Stoica, and Zhang Hui. 2011. Understanding the Impact of Video Quality on User Engagement. In Acm Sigcomm Conference.
[5]
Te-Yuan Huang, Ramesh Johari, Nick McKeown, Matthew Trunnell, and Mark Watson. 2015. A buffer-based approach to rate adaptation: Evidence from a large video streaming service. SIGCOMM, Vol. 44, 4 (2015), 187--198.
[6]
J. Jiang, V. Sekar, and H. Zhang. 2014. Improving Fairness, Efficiency, and Stability in HTTP-Based Adaptive Video Streaming With Festive. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 22, 1 (Feb 2014), 326--340. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2013.2291681
[7]
Yoon Jung Park, Yang Yoonsik, Hyocheol Ro, Jinwon Cha, Kyuri Kim, and Tack Don Han. 2018. ChildAR-bot: Educational Playing Projection-based AR Robot for Children. 1278--1282. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240508.3241362
[8]
Teemu Kämäräinen, Matti Siekkinen, Jukka Eerikäinen, and Antti Ylä-Jääski. 2018. CloudVR: Cloud Accelerated Interactive Mobile Virtual Reality. 1181--1189. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240508.3240620
[9]
Timothy P Lillicrap, Jonathan J Hunt, Alexander Pritzel, Nicolas Heess, Tom Erez, Yuval Tassa, David Silver, and Daan Wierstra. 2015. Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.02971 (2015).
[10]
Hongzi Mao, Ravi Netravali, and Mohammad Alizadeh. 2017. Neural adaptive video streaming with pensieve. In SIGCOMM. ACM, 197--210.
[11]
Volodymyr Mnih, Adria Puigdomenech Badia, Mehdi Mirza, Alex Graves, Timothy Lillicrap, Tim Harley, David Silver, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. 2016. Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning. 1928--1937. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.01783.pdf
[12]
Volodymyr Mnih, Koray Kavukcuoglu, David Silver, Andrei A Rusu, Joel Veness, Marc G Bellemare, Alex Graves, Martin Riedmiller, Andreas K Fidjeland, Georg Ostrovski, et almbox. 2015. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, Vol. 518, 7540 (2015), 529--533.
[13]
Kevin Spiteri, Rahul Urgaonkar, and Ramesh K. Sitaraman. 2016. BOLA: Near-Optimal Bitrate Adaptation for Online Videos. (01 2016).
[14]
Eckehard Steinbach, Niko Farber, and Bernd Girod. 2001. Adaptive playout for low latency video streaming. In Proceedings 2001 International Conference on Image Processing, Vol. 1. IEEE, 962--965.
[15]
Praveen Kumar Yadav, Arash Shafiei, and Wei Tsang Ooi. 2017. QUETRA: A Queuing Theory Approach to DASH Rate Adaptation. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1130--1138. https://doi.org/10.1145/3123266.3123390
[16]
Xiaoqi Yin, Abhishek Jindal, Vyas Sekar, and Bruno Sinopoli. 2015. A control-theoretic approach for dynamic adaptive video streaming over HTTP. In SIGCOMM, Vol. 45. ACM, 325--338.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)A review on machine learning based user-centric multimedia streaming techniquesComputer Communications10.1016/j.comcom.2024.108011231(108011)Online publication date: Feb-2025
  • (2024)VCApather: A Network as a Service Solution for Video Conference ApplicationsProceedings of the 34th edition of the Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video10.1145/3651863.3651884(57-63)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2024
  • (2024)COCKTAIL: Video streaming QoE optimization with chunk replacement and guided learningComputer Communications10.1016/j.comcom.2024.01.014219(204-215)Online publication date: Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. The ACM Multimedia 2019 Live Video Streaming Grand Challenge

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    MM '19: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
    October 2019
    2794 pages
    ISBN:9781450368896
    DOI:10.1145/3343031
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 15 October 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. abr
    2. dash
    3. live video streaming
    4. low latency
    5. qoe

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • National Research Foundation, Prime Minister?s Office, Singapore
    • National Nature Science Foundation of China
    • National Key R&D Program of China
    • Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 2

    Conference

    MM '19
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    MM '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 252 of 936 submissions, 27%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,145 of 8,556 submissions, 25%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)81
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)A review on machine learning based user-centric multimedia streaming techniquesComputer Communications10.1016/j.comcom.2024.108011231(108011)Online publication date: Feb-2025
    • (2024)VCApather: A Network as a Service Solution for Video Conference ApplicationsProceedings of the 34th edition of the Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video10.1145/3651863.3651884(57-63)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2024
    • (2024)COCKTAIL: Video streaming QoE optimization with chunk replacement and guided learningComputer Communications10.1016/j.comcom.2024.01.014219(204-215)Online publication date: Apr-2024
    • (2024)Improving the application performance of Loki via algorithm optimizationMultimedia Systems10.1007/s00530-023-01197-530:1Online publication date: 10-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Application Layer on Data Path: Adaptive Frame RateLatency Optimization in Interactive Multimedia Streaming10.1007/978-981-97-6729-8_5(61-85)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2024
    • (2023)Cross-layer Network Bandwidth Estimation for Low-latency Live ABR StreamingProceedings of the 14th Conference on ACM Multimedia Systems10.1145/3587819.3590990(183-193)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Latency Target based Analysis of the DASH.js PlayerProceedings of the 14th Conference on ACM Multimedia Systems10.1145/3587819.3590971(153-160)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Deep Reinforcement Learning with Importance Weighted A3C for QoE enhancement in Video Delivery Services2023 IEEE 24th International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM)10.1109/WoWMoM57956.2023.00024(97-106)Online publication date: Jun-2023
    • (2023)Adaptive Video Streaming With Automatic Quality-of-Experience OptimizationIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2022.316135122:8(4456-4470)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023
    • (2023)Post-Streaming Wastage Analysis – A Data Wastage Aware Framework in Mobile Video StreamingIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2021.306976422:1(389-401)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media