More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

short-paper

Counteract or assist?: influence of dynamic force-feedback on emotions

Authors:

Anke van Oosterhout,

Satu Jumisko-Pyykkö,

Miguel Bruns AlonsoAuthors Info & Claims

MUM '16: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia

Pages 241 - 247

https://doi.org/10.1145/3012709.3012739

Published: 12 December 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Although interfaces can adapt to users' behavior only little empirical evidence has been reported about their capability to influence people's emotions. The goal of this study is to explore the influence of haptic force feedback on the emotional experience in a linear sliding movement. We varied force feedback behaviors designed for a motorized slider in a controlled experiment. The slider presented three behaviors, named as counteractive, assistive, and no behavior while participants were exposed to affective imagery varying in valence. The results showed that under different emotions (positive, negative, neutral), people experience small differences in dominance and valence between the force feedback behaviors. A counteractive force feedback seems to increase the feeling of control regarding unpleasant stimuli, while providing an assistive force feedback reduced the level of dominance in case of pleasant stimuli. Our study contributes new understanding of how adaptive feedback influence user's emotions to support design in this field.

References

[1]

Desmet. P. 2012. Faces of Product Pleasure: 25 Positive Emotions in Human-Product Interactions. In International Journal of Design 6,2: 1--29.

[2]

Jordan, P. 2002. Designing pleasurable products: An introduction to the new human factors. CRC press.

[3]

Thüring, M., Mahlke., S. 2007. Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human-technology interaction. International Journal of Psychology 42,4:253--264. http://doi.acm.org/10.1080/00207590701396674

[4]

Fredrickson, B. L. Positive emotions broaden and build. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2013), 1--53.

[5]

Fredrickson, B. L. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lind. 359(2004), 1376--1377

[6]

Oatley, K., & Jenkins, J. M. Understanding Emotions. Oxford: Blackwell publishing. 2003.

[7]

Izard, C.E. (2010). The many meanings/aspects of emotion: Definitions, functions, activation, and regulation. Emotion Review, 2(4), 363--370.

[8]

Bradley, M.M., & Lang, P.J. (1994). Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49--59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9

[9]

Bradley, M.M., & Lang, P.J. (2000). Affective reactions to acoustic stimuli. Psychophysiology, 37, 204--215.

[10]

Mauss, I.B., & Robinson, M.D. (2009). Measures of emotion: A review. Cognition and Emotion, 23(2), 209--237.

[11]

Wallbott, H.G. (1998). Bodily expression of emotion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(6), 879--896.

[12]

Pollick, F.E., Paterswon, H.M., Bruderlin, A., Sanford, A.J.: Perceiving affect from arm movement. Journal of Cognition 82, 51--61 (2001)

[13]

MacLean, K. E. (2008). Haptic interaction design for everyday interfaces. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 4(1), 149--194.

[14]

Tan, H. Z., Srinivasan, M. A., Eberman, B., & Cheng, B. (1994). Human factors for the design of force-reflecting haptic interfaces. Dynamic Systems and Control, 55(1), 353--359.

[15]

Salminen, K., Surakka, V., Lylykangas, J., Raisamo, J., Saarinen, R., Raisamo, R., Rantala, J., Evreinov. G. 2008. Emotional and behavioral responses to haptic stimulation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08), 1555--1562. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357298

Digital Library

[16]

Gatti, E., Caruso, G., Bordegoni, M., and Spence, C. 2013. Can the feel of the haptic interaction modify a user's emotional state? In IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC'13), 247--252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2013.6548416

[17]

Alonso, M. B. Hummels, C., Keyson, D., Hekkert. P. 2013. Measuring and adapting behavior during product interaction to influence affect. In Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17,1: 81--91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0472-3

Digital Library

[18]

Alonso, M. B., Keyson, D. V., Jabon, M. E., Hummels, C. C., Hekkert, P. P., & Bailenson, J. N. (2013). Post-error expression of speed and force while performing a simple, monotonous task with a haptic pen. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(8), 778--782.

Digital Library

[19]

Zhu, J. and Thagard, P. 2002. Emotion and action. In Philosophical Psychology, 15,1: 19--36. http://doi.acm.org/10.1080/09515080120109397

[20]

Chen, M., Bargh, J. 1999. Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. In Personality and social psychology bulletin, 25.2: 215--224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025002007

[21]

Coombes, S., Cauraugh, J., Janelle, C. 2007. Dissociating motivational direction and affective valence: specific emotions alter central motor processes. In Psychological Science 18,11:938--942. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02005.x

[22]

Dan-Glauser, E., Scherer, K. 2011. The Geneva affective picture database (GAPED): a new 730-picture database focusing on valence and normative significance. In Behavior Research Methods 43,2:468--477. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0064-1

[23]

Jumisko-Pyykkö S, Häkkinen J, Nyman G (2007) Experienced quality factors---qualitative evaluation approach to audiovisual quality. Proc SPIE Multimedia on Mobile Devices 2007:6507(65070 M)

[24]

ALPS. Motor-driven Master Type Slide Potentiometer RSA0N11M9A0K. Technical Specifications. 2014. Retrieved July 31, 2015 from http://www.alps.com/prod/info/E/HTML/Potentiometer/SlidePotentiometers/RSN1M/RSA0N11M9A0K.html

[25]

Shahrokni, A., Jenaro, J., Gustafsson, T., Vinnberg, A., Sandsjö, J., Fjeld, M. 2006. One-dimensional force feedback slider: going from an analogue to a digital platform. In Proc of the 4th NordiCHI '06, 453--456. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182535

Digital Library

[26]

Coombes, S., Cauraugh, J., Janelle, C. 2005. Emotion and movement: activations of the defensive circuitry alters the magnitude of a sustained muscle contraction. In Neuroscience Letters, 396,3:192--196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2005.11.048

[27]

Coolican H (2004) Research methods and statistics in psychology, 4th edn. Arrowsmith, LondonStrauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

[28]

Bradley, M., Lang, P. 1994. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. In Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 25,1: 49--59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9

[29]

Bakhtiyari, K., Husain, H. 2014. Fuzzy model of dominance emotions in affective computing. In Neural Computing and Applications 25, 6:1467--1477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1637-6

Digital Library

[30]

Höök, K. 2009. Affective loop experiences: designing for interactional embodiment. In Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364,1535: 3585--3595. http://doi.acm.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0202

[31]

Russell, James A., and Albert Mehrabian. "Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions." Journal of research in Personality 11.3 (1977): 273--294.

[32]

Ahmed, I., Harjunen, V., Jacucci, G., Hoggan, E., Ravaja, N., Spape, M.M. Reach out and touch me: Effects of four distinct haptic technologies on affective touch in virtual reality, in press ICMI 2016.

Cited By

van Oosterhout ABruns Alonso MJumisko-Pyykkö SMandryk RHancock MPerry MCox A(2018)Ripple ThermostatProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3173574.3174229(1-12)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3173574.3174229

Index Terms

Counteract or assist?: influence of dynamic force-feedback on emotions
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Interaction devices
      1. Haptic devices

Recommendations

Real time labeling of affect in music using the affectbutton
AFFINE '10: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Affective interaction in natural environments

Valid, reliable and quick measurement of emotion and affect is an important challenge for the use of emotion and affect in human-technology interaction. Emotion and affect can be measured in two different ways: explicit, the user is asked for feedback, ...
A Multimodal Measurement Method of Users' Emotional Experiences Shopping Online

Emotions play an important role in the design of e-commerce websites. A website should satisfy its users' emotional needs. Emotion measurement is a prerequisite to understanding users' emotional needs; because emotions contain complicated components, ...
Squeeze, rock, and roll; can tangible interaction with affective products support stress reduction?
TEI '08: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction

Affective computing focuses on the interpretation of users emotions via physiological and behavioral inputs. Irrelevant gestures with a pen were found to increase when users were given a mentally demanding task. Accordingly, an embedded tangible ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

MUM '16: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia

December 2016

366 pages

ISBN:9781450348607

DOI:10.1145/3012709

General Chairs:
Jonna Häkkila
University of Lapland, Finland
,
Timo Ojala
University of Oulu, Finland

Copyright © 2016 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 12 December 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Short-paper

Funding Sources

Conference

MUM '16

MUM '16: 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia

December 12 - 15, 2016

Rovaniemi, Finland

Acceptance Rates

MUM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 35 of 77 submissions, 45%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 190 of 465 submissions, 41%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
159
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)21
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

van Oosterhout ABruns Alonso MJumisko-Pyykkö SMandryk RHancock MPerry MCox A(2018)Ripple ThermostatProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3173574.3174229(1-12)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3173574.3174229

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents