[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2883851.2883955acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reflecting on reflective writing analytics: assessment challenges and iterative evaluation of a prototype tool

Published: 25 April 2016 Publication History

Abstract

When used effectively, reflective writing tasks can deepen learners' understanding of key concepts, help them critically appraise their developing professional identity, and build qualities for lifelong learning. As such, reflecting writing is attracting substantial interest from universities concerned with experiential learning, reflective practice, and developing a holistic conception of the learner. However, reflective writing is for many students a novel genre to compose in, and tutors may be inexperienced in its assessment. While these conditions set a challenging context for automated solutions, natural language processing may also help address the challenge of providing real time, formative feedback on draft writing. This paper reports progress in designing a writing analytics application, detailing the methodology by which informally expressed rubrics are modelled as formal rhetorical patterns, a capability delivered by a novel web application. This has been through iterative evaluation on an independently human-annotated corpus, showing improvements from the first to second version. We conclude by discussing the reasons why classifying reflective writing has proven complex, and reflect on the design processes enabling work across disciplinary boundaries to develop the prototype to its current state.

References

[1]
Aït-Mokhtar, S., Chanod, J-P., and Roux, C. 2002. Robustness beyond shallowness: incremental dependency parsing. Natural Language Engineering, 8, 2/3 (Aug. 2002), 121--144. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1351324902002887
[2]
Boud, D., Keogh, R., and Walker, D. 2013. Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon.
[3]
Boud, D. and Walker, D. 1998. Promoting reflection in professional courses: the challenge of context. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 2 (Aug. 2006), 191--206. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380384
[4]
Brun, C., and Hagège, C. 2003. Normalization and paraphrasing using symbolic methods. Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Paraphrasing, Volume 16. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2003. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/1118984.1118990
[5]
Brun, C., and Hagège, C. 2004. Intertwining deep syntactic processing and named entity detection. Advances in Natural Language Processing. Springer: Berlin, 2004. 195-206. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30228-5_18
[6]
Brun, C., Popa, D. N., and Roux, C. 2014. XRCE: Hybrid classification for aspect-based sentiment analysis. Proc. 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014), 838--842. (Dublin, Ireland, August 23-24, 2014).
[7]
Burnett, M. M., and Scaffidi, C. 2011. End-User Development. The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Edition. (Eds. Mads Soegaard and Rikke Friis Dam). Interaction Design Foundation: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/book/the-encyclopedia-of-human-computer-interaction-2nd-ed
[8]
De Liddo, A., Sándor. Á., and Buckingham Shum, S. 2012. Contested collective intelligence: Rationale, technologies, and a human-machine annotation study. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 21.4-5 (2012): 417-448. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-011-9155-x
[9]
Gibson, A. and Kitto, K. 2015. Analysing reflective text for learning analytics: an approach using anomaly recontextualisation. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. ACM: NY. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2723576.2723635
[10]
Hatton N. and Smith, D. 1995. Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching & Teacher Education. 11, 1 (Jan. 1995), 33--49. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)00012-U
[11]
Huang, Z., ten Teije, A., van Harmelen, F., and Aït-Mokhtar, S. 2014. Semantic representation of evidence-based clinical guidelines. Proc. 6th International Workshop on Knowledge Representation for Health Care. 2014: Vienna (21 July 2014). p. 78--94. DOI= http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13281-5_6
[12]
Lisacek, F., Chichester, C., Kaplan, A., and Sandor, Á. 2005. Discovering paradigm shift patterns in biomedical abstracts: application to neurodegenerative diseases. In Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Semantic Mining in Biomedicine (SMBM) (41-50).
[13]
MacLean, M., Kathleen Carter, Lövstrand, L., and Moran, T. 1990. User-tailorable systems: pressing the issues with buttons. Proc. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 175--182. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/97243.97271
[14]
Moon, J. 2010. Reflective Learning Workshop (Handout 10/07), University of Worcester, UK. http://worc.ac.uk/edu/documents/Jenny_Moon_RefLearnlong07.doc
[15]
Reidsema, C., Goldsmith, R., & Mort, P. 2010. Writing to learn: reflective practice in engineering design, Proceedings of ASEE Symposium Singapore, October 18-21
[16]
Rodgers, C. 2002. Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record. 104.4 (2002): 842--866. http://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=10890
[17]
Russell, R. 2001. Reflection in higher education: A concept analysis. Innovative Higher Education. 21.6 (2001). DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010986404527
[18]
Ryan, M. 2011. Improving reflective writing in higher education: a social semiotic perspective, Teaching in Higher Education, 16, 1 (Jan. 2011), 99--111. DOI= http://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.507311
[19]
Ryan, M. 2010. The 4 Rs Model of Reflective Thinking, Version 1.5. Developing Reflective Approaches to Writing (DRAW) Project, Queensland University of Technology. http://www.citewrite.qut.edu.au/write/4Rs-for-students-page1-v1.5.pdf
[20]
Ryan, M. & Ryan, M. 2012. Developing a systematic, cross-faculty approach to teaching and assessing reflection in higher education. Office of Learning and Teaching. http://www.olt.gov.au/system/files/resources/PP9_1327_Ryan_report_2012.pdf
[21]
Sándor, Á., Kaplan, A., and Rondeau, R. 2006. Discourse and citation analysis with concept-matching. International Symposium: Discourse and Document. (Caen, 15-17 June 2006).
[22]
Sándor, Á. 2007. Modeling metadiscourse conveying the author's rhetorical strategy in biomedical research abstracts. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, 12, 2, 97--108.
[23]
Sándor, Á., and Vorndran, A. 2009. Detecting key sentences for automatic assistance in peer reviewing research articles in educational sciences. Proceedings of the Workshop on Text and Citation Analysis for Scholarly Digital Libraries, 47th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Singapore, 2-7 Aug, 2009).
[24]
Scouller, K. 1998. The influence of assessment methods on students' learning approaches: multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35, 4, 453--472. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1003196224280
[25]
Simsek, D., Buckingham Shum, S., Sándor, Á., Liddo, A. D., and Ferguson, R. 2013. XIP Dashboard: Visual analytics from automated rhetorical parsing of scientific metadiscourse. 1st International Workshop on Discourse-Centric Learning Analytics, 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (Leuven, BE, Apr. 8-12, 2013).
[26]
Sumsion, J. and Fleet, A. 1996. Reflection: can we assess it? Should we assess it?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21, 2 (July. 2006), 121--130. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293960210202
[27]
Ullmann, T. D., Wild, F. and Scott, P. 2012. Comparing automatically detected reflective texts with human judgements. In 2nd Workshop on Awareness and Reflection in Technology-Enhanced Learning, Saarbruecken, Germany, September 2012, 101--116.
[28]
Webster-Wright, A. 2013. The eye of the storm: a mindful inquiry into reflective practices in higher education. Reflective Practice, 14, 4 (May. 2013) 556-567. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2013.810618
[29]
Xerox Incremental Parser. Open Xerox Documentation: https://open.xerox.com/Services/XIPParser

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Facilitating learners' self‐assessment during formative writing tasks using writing analytics toolkitJournal of Computer Assisted Learning10.1111/jcal.1303640:6(2822-2839)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Emerging technologies in higher education assessment and feedback practices: A systematic literature reviewJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2024.111988211(111988)Online publication date: May-2024
  • (2024)Navigating the ethical landscape of multimodal learning analytics: a guiding frameworkEthics in Online AI-based Systems10.1016/B978-0-443-18851-0.00014-7(25-53)Online publication date: 2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Reflecting on reflective writing analytics: assessment challenges and iterative evaluation of a prototype tool

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    LAK '16: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge
    April 2016
    567 pages
    ISBN:9781450341905
    DOI:10.1145/2883851
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 25 April 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. education
    2. learning analytics
    3. metadiscourse
    4. natural language processing
    5. reflection
    6. rhetoric
    7. writing analytics

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    LAK '16

    Acceptance Rates

    LAK '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 116 submissions, 31%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 236 of 782 submissions, 30%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)77
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Facilitating learners' self‐assessment during formative writing tasks using writing analytics toolkitJournal of Computer Assisted Learning10.1111/jcal.1303640:6(2822-2839)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Emerging technologies in higher education assessment and feedback practices: A systematic literature reviewJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2024.111988211(111988)Online publication date: May-2024
    • (2024)Navigating the ethical landscape of multimodal learning analytics: a guiding frameworkEthics in Online AI-based Systems10.1016/B978-0-443-18851-0.00014-7(25-53)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2023)Prompting Reflection: Using Corpus Linguistic Methods in the Local Assessment of Reflective WritingWritten Communication10.1177/0741088322114942540:2(620-650)Online publication date: 9-Mar-2023
    • (2023)Supervised Learning Algorithm: Enhancing Reflective Writing Skills within the Context of the International Project ‘Out of Eden Walk’ and the Principles of ‘Slow’ Journalism2023 4th International Conference on Computation, Automation and Knowledge Management (ICCAKM)10.1109/ICCAKM58659.2023.10449604(1-5)Online publication date: 12-Dec-2023
    • (2022)Text Mining in Education—A Bibliometrics-Based Systematic ReviewEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1203021012:3(210)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2022
    • (2022)Connecting the dots – A literature review on learning analytics indicators from a learning design perspectiveJournal of Computer Assisted Learning10.1111/jcal.1271640:6(2432-2470)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2022
    • (2022)The Evidence of Impact and Ethical Considerations of Multimodal Learning Analytics: A Systematic Literature ReviewThe Multimodal Learning Analytics Handbook10.1007/978-3-031-08076-0_12(289-325)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2022
    • (2020)Perceptions and expectations about learning analytics from a brazilian higher education institutionProceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge10.1145/3375462.3375478(240-249)Online publication date: 23-Mar-2020
    • (2020)Applications of learning analytics in Latin AmericaBritish Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.1297851:4(871-874)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2020
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media