[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2599990.2600002acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Cultural richness versus cultural large scale insights: culture, globalization, and it workers

Published: 29 May 2014 Publication History

Abstract

The increasing globalization of business and of the Information Technology (IT) workforce has increased interest in cross-cultural issues associated with distributed software development, virtual teams, and cultural conflict or collaboration using information and communication technologies (ICT's) [6]. We continue to see a reliance on studies using quantitative methods that compare a limited number of cultural variables (such as Hofstede's 1984), often because of the challenges associated with richer interpretive or ethnographic studies. Ethnography is a traditional design approach when studying rich cultural issues, deeply rooted in anthropology and goals of rich, emic description, and understanding [1]. Unfortunately, in information systems (IS) research, there is a predominant emphasis on quantitative survey designs, sacrificing cultural richness for broader sampling of more limited variables. Our extended abstract proposes mixed method designs that incorporate both quantitative and qualitative methods as a viable, richer alternative to survey research of cultural studies. For purposes of our presentation at ACM SIGMIS-CPR, we are providing some preliminary arguments from our larger study where additional research is analyzed and compared. To illustrate our points, however, we briefly compare two IS cultural studies, one using comparative ethnography and one using a sequential, phased mixed method design. Our goal is not to discourage rich cultural ethnographies, but to provide a viable alternative approach that may enable more culture research in IS.

References

[1]
Bernard, H. R. (1988) Cultural Anthropology. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
[2]
Creswell, J. W. (1994) Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage.
[3]
Green, Jennifer D. (2008) Is Mixed Methods Social Inquiry a Distinctive Methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Vol. 2(1), 7--22. Sage.
[4]
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J. and Graham, W. F. (1989) Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 11, 255--274.
[5]
Guzman, I. (2006) As you like I.T.: Occupational Culture and Commitment of New Information Technologists. Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
[6]
Heinzl, A. and Leidner, D (2012) "Information Systems and Culture - The World Might be Flat, but It is Culturally Rich (Editorial)". Business and Information Systems Engineering, Vol. 3, 109--110.
[7]
Kaarst-Brown, M. (1995) A Theory of Information Technology Cultures: Magic Dragons, Wizards, and Archetypal Patterns, York University (Released 1999), Toronto, ON Canada.
[8]
Kaarst-Brown, M.L. & Guzman, I.R. (2008) "Decisions, Decisions: Ethnography or mixed-method approaches to study cultural issues in IS Research". Cultural Attitudes Toward Technology and Communication (CATaC) 2008, Editors, F. Sudweeks, H. Hrochovec, and C. Ess. Nimes, France. June 24--27.
[9]
Leidner, D. E. and Kayworth, T. (2006) Review: A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict. MIS Quarterly, 30, 357.
[10]
Leininger, M. (1994) Evaluation Criteria and Critique of Qualitative Research Studies. In Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods (Ed, Morse, J. M.). Sage, 95--115.
[11]
Mingers, J. (2001) Combining IS research methods: Towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research, 12, 240--259.
[12]
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. and Leech, N. L. (2004) Enhancing the Interpretation of "Significant" Findings: The Role of Mixed Methods Research. The Qualitative Report, 9, 770--792.
[13]
Schein, E. H. (1985) Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA.
[14]
Schwartzman, H. B. (1993) Ethnography in Organizations. Sage.
[15]
Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. (1998) Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage.
[16]
Tedlock, B. (2003) Ethnography and Ethnographic Representation. In Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry (Ed, Lincoln, Y. S.), Sage, 165--213.
[17]
Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A. and Bala, H. (2013) Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 37(1), 21--54.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Qualitative Secondary Analysis as an Alternative Approach for Cross-Cultural DesignProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445108(1-15)Online publication date: 6-May-2021

Index Terms

  1. Cultural richness versus cultural large scale insights: culture, globalization, and it workers

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGSIM-CPR '14: Proceedings of the 52nd ACM conference on Computers and people research
      May 2014
      204 pages
      ISBN:9781450326254
      DOI:10.1145/2599990
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 29 May 2014

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. culture
      2. ethnography
      3. mixed method
      4. research design choices

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      SIGMIS-CPR '14
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGSIM-CPR '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 26 of 35 submissions, 74%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 300 of 480 submissions, 63%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 04 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2021)Qualitative Secondary Analysis as an Alternative Approach for Cross-Cultural DesignProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445108(1-15)Online publication date: 6-May-2021

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media