[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Walking improves your cognitive map in environments that are large-scale and large in extent

Published: 01 July 2011 Publication History

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of body-based information (proprioception, etc.) when participants navigated large-scale virtual marketplaces that were either small (Experiment 1) or large in extent (Experiment 2). Extent refers to the size of an environment, whereas scale refers to whether people have to travel through an environment to see the detail necessary for navigation. Each participant was provided with full body-based information (walking through the virtual marketplaces in a large tracking hall or on an omnidirectional treadmill), just the translational component of body-based information (walking on a linear treadmill, but turning with a joystick), just the rotational component (physically turning but using a joystick to translate) or no body-based information (joysticks to translate and rotate). In large and small environments translational body-based information significantly improved the accuracy of participants' cognitive maps, measured using estimates of direction and relative straight line distance but, on its own, rotational body-based information had no effect. In environments of small extent, full body-based information also improved participants' navigational performance. The experiments show that locomotion devices such as linear treadmills would bring substantial benefits to virtual environment applications where large spaces are navigated, and theories of human navigation need to reconsider the contribution made by body-based information, and distinguish between environmental scale and extent.

References

[1]
Avraamides, M. N., Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., and Golledge, R. G. 2004. Use of cognitive versus perceptual heading during imagined locomotion depends on the response mode. Psych. Sci. 15, 403--408.
[2]
Bremmer, F. and Lappe, M. 1999. The use of optical velocities for distance discrimination and reproduction during visually simulated self motion. Exper. Brain Resear. 127, 33--42.
[3]
Brooks, F. P., Airey, J., Alspaugh, J., Bell, A., Brown, R., Hill, C., Nimscheck, U., Rheingans, P., Rohlf, J., Smith, D., Turner, D., Varshney, A., Wang, Y., Weber, H., and Yuan, X. 1992. Six generations of building walkthrough: Final technical report to the National Science Foundation. Tech. rep. #TR92-026. Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
[4]
Brotons-Mas, J. R., O'Mara, S., and Sanchez-Vives, M. V. 2006. Neural processing of spatial information: What we know about place cells and what they can tell us about presence. Presence: Teleop. Virt. Enviro. 15, 485--499.
[5]
Buchanan, G., Blandford, A., Thimbleby, H., and Jones, M. 2004. Integrating information seeking and structuring: Exploring the role of spatial hypertexts in a digital library. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia. ACM, New York, 225--234.
[6]
Campos, J. L., Byme, P., and Sun, H. J. 2010. The brain weights body-based cues higher than vision when estimating walked distances. Eur. J. Neurosci. 31, 1889--1898.
[7]
Chance, S. S., Gaunet, F., Beall, A. C., and Loomis, J. M. 1998. Locomotion mode affects the updating of objects encountered during travel: The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs to path integration. Presence: Teleop. Virt. Enviro. 7, 168--178.
[8]
Cockburn, A. and Mckenzie, B. 2002. Evaluating the effectiveness of spatial memory in 2D and 3D physical and virtual environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 203--210.
[9]
Darken, R., Cockayne, W., and Carmein, D. 1997. The omni-directional treadmill: A locomotion device for virtual worlds. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, New York, 213--221.
[10]
De Luca, A., Mattone, R., Giordano, P. R., and BüLthoff, H. H. 2009. Control design and experimental evaluation of the 2D CyberWalk platform. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'09). IEEE, Los Alamitos: CA, 5051--5058.
[11]
Doeller, C. F., Barry, C., and Burgess, N. 2010. Evidence for grid cells in a human memory network. Nature 463, 657--661.
[12]
Feasel, J., Whitton, M. C., and Wendt, J. D. 2008. LLCM-WIP: Low-latency, continuous-motion walking-in-place. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 97--104.
[13]
Foo, P., Warren, W. H., Duchon, A., and Tarr, M. J. 2005. Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map- versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts. J. Exper. Psych.: Learn. Mem. Cogni. 31, 195--215.
[14]
Grant, S. C. and Magee, L. E. 1998. Contributions of proprioception to navigation in virtual environments. Human Factors 40, 489--497.
[15]
Hollerbach, J., Checcacci, D., Noma, H., Yanagida, Y., and Tetsutani, N. 2003. Simulating side slopes on locomotion interfaces using torso forces. In Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperation. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 91--98.
[16]
Hölscher, C., Schnee, A., Dahmen, H., Setia, L., and Mallot, H. A. 2005. Rats are able to navigate in virtual environments. J. Exper. Biol. 208, 561--569.
[17]
Jansen-Osmann, P. and Fuchs, P. 2006. Wayfinding behavior and spatial knowledge of adults and children in a virtual environment: The role of landmarks. Exper. Psych. 5, 171--181.
[18]
Kearns, M. J., Warren, W. H., Duchon, A. P., and Tarr, M. J. 2002. Path integration from optic flow and body senses in a homing task. Perception 31, 349--374.
[19]
Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Beall, A. C., Chance, S. S., and Golledge, R. G. 1998. Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psych. Sci. 9, 293--298.
[20]
Lessels, S. and Ruddle, R. A. 2004. Changes in navigational behaviour produced by a wide field of view and a high fidelity visual scene. In Proceedings of the 10th Eurographics Symposium on Virtual Environments. Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, 71--78.
[21]
Lessels, S. and Ruddle, R. A. 2005. Movement around real and virtual cluttered environments. Presence: Teleop. Virt. Environ. 14, 580--596.
[22]
Loomis, J., Klatzky, R. L., Golledge, R. G., and Philbeck, J. W. 1999. Human navigation by path integration. In Wayfinding: Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes, R. Golledge Ed., John Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, 125--151.
[23]
Mcnaughton, B. L., Battaglia, F. P., Jensen, O., Moser, E. I., and Moser, M.-B. 2006. Path integration and the neural basis of the 'cognitive map'. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 7, 663--678.
[24]
Montello, D. R. 1991. The measurement of cognitive distance: Methods and construct validity. J. Environ. Psych. 11, 101--122.
[25]
Montello, D. R. 1998. A new framework for understanding the acquisition of spatial knowledge in large-scale environments. In Spatial and Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Information Systems, R. Golledge and M. Egenhofer Eds., Oxford University, New York, 143--154.
[26]
O'hara, K. and Payne, S. 1998. The effects of operator implementation cost on planfulness of problem solving and learning. Cogn. Psych. 35, 34--70.
[27]
O'Keefe, J. and Nadel, L. 1978. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. Oxford University, Oxford.
[28]
Peck, T. C., Fuchs, H., and Whitton, M. C. 2009. Evaluation of reorientation techniques and distractors for walking in large virtual environments. IEEE Trans. Visualiza. Comput. Graph. 15, 383--394.
[29]
Riecke, B. E., Van Veen, H. A. H. C., and BüLthoff, H. H. 2002. Visual homing is possible without landmarks: A path integration study in virtual reality. Presence: Teleop. Virt. Environ. 11, 443--473.
[30]
Robertson, G., Czerwinski, M., Larson, K., Robbins, D. C., Thiel, D., and Van Dantzich, M. 1998. Data mountain: Using spatial memory for document management. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, New York, 153--162.
[31]
Ruddle, R. A. 2001. Navigation: Am I really lost or virtually there? In Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, D. Harris Ed., Ashgate, Burlington, VT, 135--142.
[32]
Ruddle, R. A. 2010. INSPIRE: A new method for mapping information spaces. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'10). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 273--279.
[33]
Ruddle, R. A., Howes, A., Payne, S. J., and Jones, D. M. 2000. The effects of hyperlinks on navigation in virtual environments. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 53, 551--581.
[34]
Ruddle, R. A. and Lessels, S. 2009. The benefits of using a walking interface to navigate virtual environments. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 16, article 5.
[35]
Ruddle, R. A., Payne, S. J., and Jones, D. M. 1997. Navigating buildings in “desk-top” virtual environments: Experimental investigations using extended navigational experience. J. Exper. Psychol. Appl. 3, 143--159.
[36]
Ruddle, R. A., Payne, S. J., and Jones, D. M. 1999. Navigating large-scale virtual environments: What differences occur between helmet-mounted and desk-top displays? Presence: Teleop. Virt. Environ. 8, 157--168.
[37]
Ruddle, R. A. and Péruch, P. 2004. Effects of proprioceptive feedback and environmental characteristics on spatial learning in virtual environments. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 60, 299--326.
[38]
Ruddle, R. A., Volkova, E., Mohler, B., and Bülthoff, H. H. in press. The effect of landmark and body-based sensory information on route learning. Memory Cognition.
[39]
Slater, M., Usoh, M., and Steed, A. 1995. Taking steps: The influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 2, 201--219.
[40]
Souman, J. L., Frissen, I., Sreenivasa, M. N., and Ernst, M. O. 2009. Walking straight into circles. Current Biology 19, 1538--1542.
[41]
Souman, J. L., Giordano, P. R., Frissen, I., De Luca, A., and Ernst, M. O. 2010. Making virtual walking real: Perceptual evaluation of a new treadmill control algorithm. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 7, article 11.
[42]
Suma, E. A., Finkelstein, S. L., Reid, M., Babu, S. V., Ulinski, A. C., and Hodges, L. F. 2010. Evaluation of the cognitive effects of travel technique in complex real and virtual environments. IEEE Trans. Visualiza. Comput. Graph. 16, 690--702.
[43]
Sun, H. J., Campos, J. L., Young, M., Chan, G. S. W., and Ellard, C. G. 2004. The contributions of static visual cues, nonvisual cues, and topic flow in distance estimation. Perception 33, 49--65.
[44]
Tan, D. S., Gergle, D., Scupelli, P., and Pausch, R. 2006. Physically large displays improve performance on spatial tasks. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 13, 71--99.
[45]
Templeman, J., Denbrook, P., and Sibert, L. 1999. Virtual locomotion: Walking in place through virtual environments. Presence: Teleop. Virtual Environ. 8, 598--617.
[46]
Thorndyke, P. and Hayes-Roth, B. 1982. Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cogn. Psych. 14, 560--589.
[47]
Trutoiu, L. C., Mohler, B. J., Schulte-Pelkum, J., and BüLthoff, H. H. 2009. Circular, linear, and curvilinear vection in a large-screen virtual environment with floor projection Comput. Graph. 33, 47--58.
[48]
Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., Franklin, N., and Bryant, D. J. 1999. Three spaces of spatial cognition. Profess. Geog. 51, 516--524.
[49]
Waller, D., Hunt, E., and Knapp, D. 1998. The transfer of spatial knowledge in virtual environment training. Presence: Teleop. Virt. Environ. 7, 129--143.
[50]
Waller, D., Loomis, J. M., and Haun, D. B. M. 2004. Body-based senses enhance knowledge of directions in large-scale environments. Psychonomi. Bull. Rev. 11, 157--163.
[51]
Weatherford, D. L. 1985. Representing and manipulating spatial information from different environments: Models to neighborhoods. In The development of spatial cognitionus, R. Cohen Ed., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 41--70.
[52]
Whitton, M. C., Cohn, J. V., Feasel, J., Zimmons, P., Razzaque, S., Poulton, S. J., Mcleod, B., and Brooks, F. P. 2005. Comparing VE locomotion interfaces. In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 123--130.
[53]
Witmer, B., Bailey, J., Knerr, B., and Parsons, K. 1996. Virtual spaces and real-world places: Transfer of route knowledge. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 45, 413--428.
[54]
Zanbaka, C., Lok, B., Babu, S., Ulinski, A., and Hodges, L. 2005. Comparison of path visualizations and cognitive measures relative to travel techniques in a virtual environment. IEEE Trans. Visualiza. Comput. Graph. 11, 694--705.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 18, Issue 2
June 2011
149 pages
ISSN:1073-0516
EISSN:1557-7325
DOI:10.1145/1970378
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 July 2011
Accepted: 01 February 2011
Revised: 01 December 2010
Received: 01 June 2010
Published in TOCHI Volume 18, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Virtual reality
  2. cognitive map
  3. locomotion
  4. navigation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)103
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Perception and navigation: What is the interface?Encyclopedia of the Human Brain10.1016/B978-0-12-820480-1.00072-3(232-245)Online publication date: 2025
  • (2025)The non-Euclidean properties of human spatial representationEncyclopedia of the Human Brain10.1016/B978-0-12-820480-1.00070-X(95-104)Online publication date: 2025
  • (2025)Virtual reality as a tool to understand spatial navigationEncyclopedia of the Human Brain10.1016/B978-0-12-820480-1.00011-5(105-126)Online publication date: 2025
  • (2024)Enhancing Spatial Cognition in Online Virtual Museum Environments: Integrating Game-Based Navigation Strategies for Improved User ExperienceApplied Sciences10.3390/app1410416314:10(4163)Online publication date: 14-May-2024
  • (2024)A study of spatial cognition in the rural heritage based on VR 3D eye-tracking experimentsHeritage Science10.1186/s40494-024-01264-812:1Online publication date: 7-May-2024
  • (2024)Improving Video Navigation for Spatial Task Tutorials by Spatially Segmenting and Situating How-To VideosProceedings of the 2024 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3677386.3682103(1-13)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Comparative Effectiveness of an Omnidirectional Treadmill versus Natural Walking for Navigating in Virtual EnvironmentsACM Symposium on Applied Perception 202410.1145/3675231.3675243(1-10)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Analyzing Cognitive Demands and Detection Thresholds for Redirected Walking in Immersive Forest and Urban Environments2024 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)10.1109/VR58804.2024.00030(61-71)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
  • (2024)APF-S2T: Steering to Target Redirection Walking Based on Artificial Potential FieldsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.337205230:5(2464-2473)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
  • (2024)VR Blowing: A Physically Plausible Interaction Method for Blowing Air in Virtual RealityIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.323847830:7(3680-3692)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media