[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1542245.1542274acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Providing statistically guaranteed streaming quality for peer-to-peer live streaming

Published: 03 June 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Most of the literature on peer-to-peer (P2P) live streaming focuses on how to provide best-effort streaming quality by efficiently using the system bandwidth; however, there is no guarantee about the provided streaming quality. This paper considers how to provide statistically guaranteed streaming quality to a P2P live streaming system. We study a class of admission control algorithms which statistically guarantee that a P2P live streaming system has sufficient overall bandwidth. Our results show that there is a tradeoff between the user blocking rate and user-behavior insensitivity (i.e., whether the system performance is insensitive to the fine statistics of user behaviors). We also find that the system performance is more sensitive to the distribution change of user inter-arrival times than to that of user lifetimes.

References

[1]
Ahmed, M. Call admission control in wireless networks: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials 7, 1 (2005), 50--69.
[2]
Bindal, R., and Cao, P. Can self-organizing P2P file distribution provide QoS guarantees. ACM Operating Systems Review 40, 3 (July 2006), 22--30.
[3]
Blake, S., Black, D., Carlson, M., Davies, E., Wang, Z., and Weiss, W. An architecture for differentiated services. RFC 2475 (December 1998).
[4]
Bonald, T., Jonckheere, M., and Proutiere, A. Insensitive load balancing. In Proceedings of ACM SIGMETRICS/Performance (New York, NY, June 2004).
[5]
Bonald, T., and Proutiere, A. Insensitivity in processor-sharing networks. Performance Evaluation 49, 1-4 (September 2002), 193--209.
[6]
Bonald, T., and Proutiere, A. Insensitive bandwidth sharing in data networks. Queueing Systems 44, 1 (May 2003), 69--100.
[7]
Braden, R., Clark, D., and Shenker, S. Integrated services in the Internet architecture: an overview. RFC 1633 (June 1994).
[8]
Crowcroft, J., Hand, S., Mortier, R., Roscoe, T., and Warfield, A. QoS's downfall: At the bottom, or not at all. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Revisiting IP QoS: What have we learned, why do we care? (Germany, August 2003).
[9]
Hei, X., Liang, C., Liang, J., Liu, Y., and Ross, K. A measurement study of a large-scale P2P IPTV system. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 9, 8 (December 2007), 1672--1687.
[10]
Jamin, S., Danzig, P., Shenker, S., and Zhang, L. A measurement-based admission control algorithm for integrated services packet networks. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM (Cambridge, MA, August 1995).
[11]
Kumar, R., Liu, Y., and Ross, K. Stochastic fluid theory for P2P streaming systems. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM (Anchorage, AK, May 2007).
[12]
Kung, H., and Wu, C. Differentiated admission for peer-to-peer systems: Incentivizing peers to contribute their resources. In Proceedings of Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems (Berkely, CA, June 2003).
[13]
Li, B., Qu, Y., Keung, Y., Xie, S., Lin, C., Liu, J., and Zhang, X. Inside the new Coolstreaming: principles, measurements and performance implications. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM (Phoenix, AZ, April 2008).
[14]
Liu, Y., Guo, Y., and Liang, C. A survey on peer-to-peer video streaming systems. Journal of Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications 1, 1 (March 2008), 18--28.
[15]
Perros, H., and Elsayed, K. Call admission control schemes: a review. IEEE Communications Magazine 34, 11 (November 1996), 82--91.
[16]
Raghuveer, A., Dong, Y., and Du, D. On providing reliability guarantees in live video streaming with collaborative clients. In Proceedings of MMCN (San Jose, CA, January 2007).
[17]
Siwko, J., and Rubin, I. Call admission control for capacity-varying networks. Telecommnuication Systems 16, 1 (2001), 15--40.
[18]
Wang, F., Liu, J., and Xiong, Y. Stable peers: Existence, importance, and application in peer-to-peer live video streaming. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM (Phoenix, AZ, April 2008).
[19]
Wu, C., Li, B., and Zhao, S. Characterizing peer-to-peer streaming flows. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 25, 9 (December 2007), 1612--1626.
[20]
Xu, D., Hefeeda, M., Hambrusch, S., and Bhargava, B. On peer-to-peer media streaming. In Proceedings of IEEE ICDCS (Austria, July 2002).
[21]
Zhang, M., Zhang, Q., and Yang, S. Understanding the power of pull-based streaming protocol: Can we do better? IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 25, 8 (2007), 1678--1694.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Playing chunk-transferred DASH segments at low latency with QLiveProceedings of the 12th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference10.1145/3458305.3463376(51-64)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2021
  • (2013)A comprehensive platform to manage peer churn and bandwidth fluctuations in real-time multimedia P2P networksMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-011-0943-663:3(851-873)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2013
  • (2012)Flash Crowd in P2P Live Streaming SystemsIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems10.1109/TPDS.2011.28323:7(1227-1239)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2012
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Providing statistically guaranteed streaming quality for peer-to-peer live streaming

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    NOSSDAV '09: Proceedings of the 18th international workshop on Network and operating systems support for digital audio and video
    June 2009
    142 pages
    ISBN:9781605584331
    DOI:10.1145/1542245
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 03 June 2009

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. admission control
    2. peer-to-peer networks
    3. video streaming

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    NOSSDAV '09

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 118 of 363 submissions, 33%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Playing chunk-transferred DASH segments at low latency with QLiveProceedings of the 12th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference10.1145/3458305.3463376(51-64)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2021
    • (2013)A comprehensive platform to manage peer churn and bandwidth fluctuations in real-time multimedia P2P networksMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-011-0943-663:3(851-873)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2013
    • (2012)Flash Crowd in P2P Live Streaming SystemsIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems10.1109/TPDS.2011.28323:7(1227-1239)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2012
    • (2010)Linear programming models for multi-channel P2P streaming systemsProceedings of the 29th conference on Information communications10.5555/1833515.1833571(276-280)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2010
    • (2010)Linear Programming Models For Multi-Channel P2P Streaming Systems2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM10.1109/INFCOM.2010.5462230(1-5)Online publication date: Mar-2010
    • (2010)MIS: Malicious Nodes Identification Scheme in Network-Coding-Based Peer-to-Peer Streaming2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM10.1109/INFCOM.2010.5462226(1-5)Online publication date: Mar-2010
    • (2010)Distance Estimation by Constructing The Virtual Ruler in Anisotropic Sensor Networks2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM10.1109/INFCOM.2010.5461928(1-9)Online publication date: Mar-2010
    • (2010)Chemical Reaction Optimization for population transition in peer-to-peer live streamingIEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation10.1109/CEC.2010.5585933(1-8)Online publication date: Jul-2010

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media