[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1109/INFCOM.2007.112guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Stochastic Fluid Theory for P2P Streaming Systems

Published: 01 May 2007 Publication History

Abstract

We develop a simple stochastic fluid model that seeks to expose the fundamental characteristics and limitations of P2P streaming systems. This model accounts for many of the essential features of a P2P streaming system, including the peers' realtime demand for content, peer churn (peers joining and leaving), peers with heterogeneous upload capacity, limited infrastructure capacity, and peer buffering and playback delay. The model is tractable, providing closed-form expressions which can be used to shed insight on the fundamental behavior of P2P streaming systems. The model shows that performance is largely determined by a critical value. When the system is of moderate-to-large size, if a certain ratio of traffic loads exceeds the critical value, the system performs well; otherwise, the system performs poorly. Furthermore, large systems have better performance than small systems since they are more resilient to bandwidth fluctuations caused by peer churn. Finally, buffering can dramatically improve performance in the critical region, for both small and large systems. In particular, buffering can bring more improvement than can additional infrastructure bandwidth.

References

[1]
Akamai, http://www.akamai.com
[2]
E.W. Biersack, P. Rodriguez and P. Felber, Performance Analysis of Peer-to-Peer Networks for File Distribution, In proceedings of Quality of Future Internet Services (QOFIS04), September 2004, Barcelona, Spain.
[3]
Y. Chu, S. G. Rao and H. Zhang, A Case for End System Multicast, ACM SIGMETRICS 2000, June 2000, Santa Clara, CA, USA.
[4]
F. Clevenot, P. Nain and K.W. Ross, Multiclass P2P Networks: Static Resource Allocation for Bandwidth for Service Differentiation and Bandwidth Diversity, Performance 2005, Juan-les-Pins, 2005.
[5]
B. Cohen, Incentives Build Robustness in BitTorrent, First Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, June 2003, Berkeley, CA.
[6]
S. Deering and D. Cheriton, Multicast Routing in Datagram Internetworks and Extended LANs, ACM TRANSACTIONS on Computer Systems, Pages 85-111, May 1990.
[7]
L. Kontothanassis, R. Sitaraman, J. Wein, D. Hong, R. Kleinberg, B. Mancuso, D. Shaw and D. Stodolsky, A Transport Layer for Live Streaming in a Content Delivery Network, IEEE PROCEEDINGS, volume 92, pages 1408-1419, September 2004.
[8]
FeiDian, http://tv.net9.org
[9]
X. Hei, C. Liang, J. Liang, Y. Liu and K. W. Ross, A Measurement Study of a Large-Scale P2P IPTV System, Submitted.
[10]
L. Kleinrock, Queueing Systems, vol. I: Theory, John Wiley and Sons, 1975.
[11]
R. Kumar, K.W. Ross, Peer Assisted File Distribution: The Minimum Distribution Time, To appear in First IEEE Workshop on Hot Topics in Web Systems and Technologies, HOTWEB 2006, November 2006, Boston, MA, USA.
[12]
J. Mundinger, R. R. Weber and G. Weiss, Analysis of Peer-to-Peer File Dissemination amongst Users of Different Upload Capacities, Performance Evaluation Review, Performance 2005 Issue.
[13]
PPLive, http://www.pplive.com
[14]
PPStream, http://www.ppstream.com
[15]
D. Qiu and S. Srikant, Modeling and Performance Analysis of BitTorrent-Like Perr-to-Peer networks, ACM SIGCOMM 2004, August 2004, Portland, Oregon.
[16]
TVAnts, http://www.tvants.com
[17]
VVSky, http://www.vvsky.com.cn
[18]
X. Zhang, J. Liu, B. Li and T-S. P. Yum, CoolStreaming: A Data-driven Overlay Network for Peer-to-Peer Live Media Streaming, IEEE INFOCOM 2005, March 2005, Miami, FL, USA.

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)Capacity of P2P On-Demand Streaming With Simple, Robust, and Decentralized ControlIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2015.247650624:5(2607-2620)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2016
  • (2016)The streaming capacity of sparsely connected P2P systems with distributed controlIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2014.235996324:1(58-71)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2016
  • (2016)A Contract-Ruled Economic Model for QoS Guarantee in Mobile Peer-to-Peer Streaming ServicesIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2015.245692015:5(1047-1061)Online publication date: 1-May-2016
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications
May 2007
2599 pages
ISBN:1424410479

Publisher

IEEE Computer Society

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 May 2007

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)Capacity of P2P On-Demand Streaming With Simple, Robust, and Decentralized ControlIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2015.247650624:5(2607-2620)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2016
  • (2016)The streaming capacity of sparsely connected P2P systems with distributed controlIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2014.235996324:1(58-71)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2016
  • (2016)A Contract-Ruled Economic Model for QoS Guarantee in Mobile Peer-to-Peer Streaming ServicesIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2015.245692015:5(1047-1061)Online publication date: 1-May-2016
  • (2016)Modelling and analysis of non-cooperative peer-assisted VoD streaming in managed networksMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-015-2477-975:8(4321-4348)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2016
  • (2016)CDNPatchInternational Journal of Communication Systems10.1002/dac.319329:17(2517-2533)Online publication date: 25-Nov-2016
  • (2015)Hybrid peer-to-peer streaming system for mobile peers with transcodingProceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mobile Multimedia Communications10.5555/2826112.2826149(173-176)Online publication date: 25-May-2015
  • (2015)How much can large-scale video-on-demand benefit from users' cooperation?IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2014.234607723:6(1846-1861)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2015
  • (2014)Cooperative channel resource sharing in P2P networksProceedings of the 5th Symposium on Information and Communication Technology10.1145/2676585.2676622(110-118)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2014
  • (2014)Optimal distributed P2P streaming under node degree boundsIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2013.227091522:3(717-730)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2014
  • (2014)A performance comparison of hose rate controller approaches for P2P-TV applicationsComputer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking10.1016/j.comnet.2014.04.01069(101-120)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2014
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media