[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

The evaluation of ARCO: a lesson in curatorial competence and intuition with new technology

Published: 01 July 2008 Publication History

Abstract

This article presents the results of the evaluation study of the Augmented Representation of Cultural Objects (ARCO) system which provides software and interface tools to museum curators for the development of virtual museum exhibitions for the World Wide Web or for information kiosks. The aim of the current research is to investigate how a virtual museum system is coping with the demands of museum curators, to examine the needs of virtual museum visitors, and to provide a set of criteria and guidelines for defining effective evaluation of such systems. Evaluation methods such as heuristic evaluation and walkthroughs were employed in the study in order to assess various components and interfaces of the system.

References

[1]
ARCO Evaluation Report. 2004. Assessment and Evaluation report on the ARCO system and its components. Retrieved July, 1, 2007: http://www.arco-web.org/TextVersion/Documents/Deliverables/Arco-D16-R-1.0-170904.pdf
[2]
Arnold, D. and G. Geser. 2007. Research Agenda for the Applications of ICT to Cultural Heritage. Epoch Publication. Budapest: Archaeolingua.
[3]
Billinghurst, M., Kato, H., and I. Poupyrev. 2001. The Magic-Book---Moving Seamlessly between Reality and Virtuality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 21 (3): 2--4.
[4]
Borun, M. and R. Korn, eds. 1999. Introduction to Museum Evaluation. Committee on Audience Research and Evaluation, American Association of Museums, Professional Practice Series, Washington, DC: AAM.
[5]
Catarci, T. 2000. What Happened when Database Researchers Met Usability. Information Systems, 25 (3): 177--212.
[6]
CIDOC Multimedia Working Group. 1997. Multimedia Evaluation Criteria. (Chair: J. Trant). Retrieved July, I, 2007: http://www.archimuse.com/papers/cidoc/cidoc.mmwg.eval.crit.html
[7]
Di Bias, N., Guermand, M. P., Orsini, C., and P. Paolini. 2002. Evaluating the Features of Museum Websites (The Bologna Report). Retrieved July, 1, 2007: http://www.archimuse.com/mw2002/papers/diblas/diblas.html
[8]
Di Blas, N., Garzotto, F., Guermand, M. P., and F. Nicolucci. 2003. A Methodology for Evaluating Archaeological Web Sites. In K. Fischer Ausserer, W. Börner, M. Goriany and L. Karlhuber-Vöckl (Eds.), Proceedings of CAA (Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology) (pp. 200--203). BAR International: British Archaeological Series.
[9]
Dumas, J. F., and J. C. Redish. 1999. A practical guide to usability testing. Portland, Intellect Ltd.
[10]
Economou, M. 2002. XII: Assessment of Projects by User Evaluation. In Guide to Good Practice in Digital Representation and Management of Cultural Heritage Material' by the National Initiative for a Networked Cultural Heritage, USA. Retrieved January 22, 2006 on the World Wide Web: http://www.nvu.edu/its/humanities/ninchguide/
[11]
Greenbaum, J., and M. Kyng, eds. 1991. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[12]
Guest G., Bunce A. and L. Johnson. 2006. How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods 18: 59.
[13]
Hein, G. E. 1998. Learning in the museum. London: Routledge.
[14]
Hooper-Greenhill, E. 2000. Changing Values in the Art Museum: Rethinking Communication and Learning. International Journal of Heritage Studies 6(1): 9--31.
[15]
Hoptman, G. H. 1992. The Virtual Museum and Related Epistemological Concerns. Sociomedia. Multimedia, Hypermedia and the Social Construction of Knowledge: 141--159.
[16]
IBM a, User-Centered Design principles. Retrieved July, 1, 2007: http://www-03.ibm.com/easy/page/13
[17]
IBM b, Design basics. Retrieved July, 1, 2007: http://www-03.ibm.com/easy/page/6
[18]
ICOM/CIDOC. Multimedia Working Group. 1996. Introduction to Multimedia in Museums. Retrieved July, 1, 2007: http://www.willpowerinfo.myby.co.uk/cidoc/introtomultimediamuseums.pdf
[19]
ISO (International Organization for Standardization) 1998. ISO 9241: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs).
[20]
Jones, J., and M. Christal. 2002. The Future of Virtual Museums: On-Line, Immersive, 3D Environments. Created Realities Group white paper. Retrieved July, 1, 2007: http://created-realities.com/pdf/Virtual_Museums.pdf
[21]
Karasimos, A. and Isard, A. 2004 'Multilingual evaluation for a natural language generation system;, Proceedings of Lanugage Resources and Evaluation (LREC) 2004
[22]
Karat, C., Campbell, R. & Fiegel, T. 1992. Comparison of Empirical Testing and Walkthrough Methods in User Interface Evaluation. In Proceedings of ACM CHI '92. Monterey, CA, May 3--7, 397--404, ACM publ.
[23]
Karoulis A., Sylaiou S., White M. 2006a. Combinatory Usability Evaluation of an Educational Virtual Museum Interface. In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT2006), Kerkrade, The Netherlands, July 2006: 340--342.
[24]
Karoulis, A., Sylaiou, S., and M. White, 2006b. Usability evaluation of a virtual museum interface. Journal Informatica. 17(3): 363--380.
[25]
Liarokapis, F., Sylaiou, S., Basu, A., Mourkoussis, N., White, M., Lister, P. F. 2004. An Interactive Visualisation Interface for Virtual Museums. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, Brussels, Belgium, December 2004: 47--56.
[26]
Lewis, C., Polson P., Wharton C., and J. Rieman. 1990. Testing walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walkup-and-use interfaces. In Chew, J. and Whiteside, J. (Eds.), Proceedings ACM CHI '90 Conference Seattle (Special issue of the SIGCHI Bulletin): 235--242.
[27]
Liarokapis, F., Sylaiou, S., Basu, A., Mourkoussis, N., White, M., and P. F. Lister. 2004. An Interactive Visualisation Interface for Virtual Museums. In Fellner, D. and Spencer S. (Eds), Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage: 47--56.
[28]
Lord, G. D., Lord, B. and J. S. Nicks. 1989a. The Cost of Collecting. Museums Journal, 89(2): 32--33.
[29]
Lord, G. D., Lord, B. and J. S. Nicks. 1989b. The Cost of Collecting. Collection Management in UK Museums - A Report commissioned by the Office of Arts and Libraries. London: HMSO.
[30]
Mazzoleni, P., Bertino E., Ferrari E. and S. Valtolina. 2004. CiVeDi: Customized Virtual Environment for Database Interaction. ACM Sigmod Record, 33(3): 15--20.
[31]
Monopoli, M and Nicholas, D. 2001. 'A user evaluation of subject based information gateways: A case study ADAM' Aslib Proceedings Vol 53 (1) January 2001: 39--52.
[32]
Mourkoussis, N., White M., Patel M., Chmielewski J. and K. Walczak. 2003. AMS - Metadata for Cultural Exhibitions using Virtual Reality. In Sutton, S., Greenberg, J., and Tennis, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of Dublin Core Conference (DC2003). Seattle, Washington, USA 2003. Retrieved July, 1, 2007: http://purl.oclc.org/dc2003/03mourkoussis.pdf
[33]
Namioka, A. and D. Schuler, eds. 1993. Participatory design. Principles and practices. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[34]
Nicks, J. 1999. Collections Management. In Lord, G. D. and Lord, B. (Eds) The Manual of Museum Planning. London: The Stationery Office, 2nd edition: 109--139.
[35]
Nielsen, J. 1993. Usability Engineering, New York, NY: Academic Press Inc.
[36]
Norman, D. A. and S. W. Draper, eds. 1986. User Centered System Design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[37]
Pearce, S. M. 1992. Museums, Objects and Collections: A Cultural Study. Leicester and London: Leicester University Press.
[38]
Preece, J., Roger, Y., Sharp, H., Beyon, D., Holland, S., and Carey, I., (1994). Human Computer Interaction. Wokingham, UK: Addison Wesley.
[39]
Preece, J., Rogers, Y., and H. Sharp. 2002. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
[40]
Romney, A. K., Weller, S. C and W. H. Batchelder. 1986. Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 88: 313--338.
[41]
Ryan, G., and H. R. Bernard. 2003. Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods 15: 85--109.
[42]
Scali, G., Segbert M. and B. Morganti. 2002. Multimedia applications for innovation in cultural heritage: 25 European trial projects and their accompanying measure TRIS. In 68th IFLA Council and General Conference August 18--24, 2002. Retrieved July, 1, 2007: http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla68/papers/044--123e.pdf
[43]
Signore, O. 2005. A Comprehensive Model for Web Sites Quality. In Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Symposium on Web Site Evolution, Budapest, Hungary: 30--36. Retrieved July, 1, 2007: http://www.weblab.isti.cnr.it/papers/restricted/wse2005.pdf)
[44]
Sylaiou S., Almosawi A., Mania K., White M. 2004. Preliminary Evaluation of the Augmented Representation of Cultural Objects System. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia, Hybrid Realities-Digital Partners, Explorations in Art, Heritage, Science and the Human Factor (VSMM04), November 2004, Softopia, Ogaki City, Japan: 426--431.
[45]
Treinen, H. 1996. Ausstellungen und Kommunikationstheorie. In Haus der Geschichte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Hrsg.), Museen und ihre Besucher, Berlin: Argon.
[46]
Tsapatori M. 2003. ORION Research Roadmap, Evaluation and Assessment, Object Rich Information Network (ORION), Deliverable 8. Retrieved July, 1, 2007: http://www.orionnet.org/Admin/LibraryLoc/file28.pdf
[47]
Vergo, P. (ed.) 1989. The New Museology. London: Reaktion Books.
[48]
Virtual Showcases. 2004. Evaluation Report. Retrieved July, 1, 2007: http://www.virtualshowcases.com/Technical/Deliverables.asp
[49]
Wang, Y., L. M. Aroyo, N. Stash, and L. Rutledge, 2007. 'Interactive User modelling for personalized access to museum collections: The Rijksmuseum case study' in C. Conati, K. McCoy, and G. Paliouras (Eds) User Modeling 2007, Vol. 4511/2007, Berlin / Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag: 385--389.
[50]
White M., Mourkoussis, N., Darcy, J., Petridis, P., Liarokapis, F., Lister, P. F., Walczak, K., Wojciechowski, R., Cellary, W., Chmielewski, J., Stawniak, M., Wiza, W., Patel, M., Stevenson, J., Manley, J., Giorgini, F., Sayd, P., and F. Gaspard. 2004. ARCO---An Architecture for Digitization, Management and Presentation of Virtual Exhibitions. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computer Graphics (CGI '2004), Hersonissos, Crete, June 2004, Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society: 622--625.
[51]
Wojciechowski, R., Walczak, K., White, M. and W. Cellary. 2004. Building Virtual and Augmented Reality Museum Exhibitions. In Spencer S. N. (ed.), Proceedings of the Web3D 2004 Symposium -the 9th International Conference on 3D Web Technology, ACM SIGGRAPH, Monterey, California (USA): 135--144.
[52]
Wolf, R. L. 1980. A naturalistic view of evaluation. Museum News, 58(1): 39--45.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Empowering cultural heritage professionals: designing interactive exhibitions with authoring toolsMuseum Management and Curatorship10.1080/09647775.2023.2209896(1-15)Online publication date: 29-May-2023
  • (2022)Expert vs novice collaborative heuristic evaluation (CHE) of a smartphone app for cultural heritage sitesMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-022-11991-481:5(6923-6942)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022
  • (2021)Envisioning, designing, and rapid prototyping heritage installations with a tangible interaction toolkitHuman–Computer Interaction10.1080/07370024.2021.194639838:2(118-158)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. The evaluation of ARCO: a lesson in curatorial competence and intuition with new technology

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Computers in Entertainment
    Computers in Entertainment   Volume 6, Issue 2
    Theoretical and Practical Computer Applications in Entertainment
    April/June 2008
    225 pages
    EISSN:1544-3574
    DOI:10.1145/1371216
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 July 2008
    Accepted: 01 April 2008
    Revised: 01 February 2008
    Received: 01 November 2007
    Published in CIE Volume 6, Issue 2

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. curatorial practices
    2. human-computer interaction
    3. usability
    4. user-centred design
    5. virtual exhibitions
    6. virtual museum evaluation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Popular
    • Editor picked

    Funding Sources

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Empowering cultural heritage professionals: designing interactive exhibitions with authoring toolsMuseum Management and Curatorship10.1080/09647775.2023.2209896(1-15)Online publication date: 29-May-2023
    • (2022)Expert vs novice collaborative heuristic evaluation (CHE) of a smartphone app for cultural heritage sitesMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-022-11991-481:5(6923-6942)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022
    • (2021)Envisioning, designing, and rapid prototyping heritage installations with a tangible interaction toolkitHuman–Computer Interaction10.1080/07370024.2021.194639838:2(118-158)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2021
    • (2021)3D Visual Interaction for Cultural Heritage SectorData Analytics for Cultural Heritage10.1007/978-3-030-66777-1_9(195-232)Online publication date: 26-Mar-2021
    • (2019)Developing and Evaluating Management Services for Collective Memory ‡Heritage10.3390/heritage20301342:3(2206-2227)Online publication date: 28-Jul-2019
    • (2018)Cross-objects user interfaces for video interaction in virtual reality museum contextMultimedia Tools and Applications10.5555/3287850.328790877:21(29013-29041)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2018
    • (2018)Cross-objects user interfaces for video interaction in virtual reality museum contextMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-018-6091-577:21(29013-29041)Online publication date: 11-May-2018
    • (2018)The Impact of Augmented Reality on Art Engagement: Liking, Impression of Learning, and DistractionVirtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality: Applications in Health, Cultural Heritage, and Industry10.1007/978-3-319-91584-5_13(153-171)Online publication date: 15-Jul-2018
    • (2017)Users' design feedback in usability evaluationHuman-centric Computing and Information Sciences10.1186/s13673-017-0100-y7:1(1-19)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017
    • (2015)Digital Heritage SystemsHospitality, Travel, and Tourism10.4018/978-1-4666-6543-9.ch030(503-527)Online publication date: 2015
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media