[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1268784.1268790acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Broadening participation in computing: issues and challenges

Published: 25 June 2007 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we survey the literature to identify the issues and challenges of broadening participation in computer science, and provide some suggestions to address these challenges. Our attention focuses on redefining the way we approach computing education so that we can successfully entice students to computing that have not traditionally participated, thereby promoting diversity and increasing the total numbers of computing professionals. Based on the literature review, we propose an interactional model from the social sciences to inform the way in which we might restructure and broaden the definition of computing and provide some examples of strategies that we have found to be successful in practice.

References

[1]
Acker, J. (1992). Gendered institutions: From sex roles to gendered institutions.Contemporary Sociology, 21: 565--569.
[2]
Ahuja, M., Robinson, J., Herring, S., and Ogan, C. (2004). Exploring antecedents of gender equitable outcomes in IT higher education. In Proceedings of the 2004 SIGMIS Conference on Computer Personnel Research: Careers, Culture, and Ethics in A Networked Environment (pp. 120--123). New York, NY, ACM Press. Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/982372.982401
[3]
American Association of University Women (AAUW). (2000). TechsSavvy: Educating Girls in the New Computer Age. Washington, DC: AAUW
[4]
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.
[5]
Clewell B. C., Ginorio, A.B., (1996) Examining Women's Progress in the Sciences from the Perspective of Diversity. In Cinda-Sue Davis, Angela B. Ginorio, et al, The Equity Equation, Fostering the Advancement of Women in the Sciences, Mathematics, and Engineering. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[6]
Cohoon, J. M. (1999). Departmental differences can point the way to improving female retention in computer science. In the Proceedings of the 30th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. pp. 198--2020. New Your, NY: ACM Press.
[7]
Cohoon, J. M. (2003). Must there be so few? Including women in computer science. In Proceedings from 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA., pgs 668--674.
[8]
Connell, R. (2002). Gender: Short Introductions. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
[9]
Dalton, S. &. Fenstermaker, S. (2002). "Doing gender" differently: Institutional change in second-parent adoptions. Chapter 9 in Fenstermaker Sarah and West Candace (Editors). Doing Gender, Doing Difference: Inequality, Power, and Institutional Change. New York: Routledge.
[10]
Davis, T., and S. Matzko (2006) Using Graphics Research to Teach Freshman Computer Science, In 33rd International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH) Educators Program, Conference DVD, Boston, MA, July 30-August 3.
[11]
Doerschuk, P. (2004). A research and mentoring program for undergraduate women in computer science, Department of Computer Science, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX, USA, 34th Annual Frontiers in Education.
[12]
Elkjaer, B. (1992). Girls and information technology in Denman -an account of a socially constructed problem, Gender & Education, 4: 25--41.
[13]
Encarnação, L. M., W. Müller, L. Osterweis, P. Thornton (2000), Developing a Curriculum on the Arts and Mechanics of New Media for an International Post-graduate Audience. ACM SIGGRAPH: SIGGRAPH 2000. Educators Program. Conference Abstracts and Applications. New York: ACM Press, pp. 34--39.
[14]
Entwistle, M. S. (2002). Augustana women in computer science (AWCS): a program to encourage women in the pursuit of technical education and careers. Journal of Comput. Small Colleges, 17(5):206--215.
[15]
Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Jacobs, V. R., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. W. (1998). New perspectives on gender differences in mathematics: A reprise. Educational Researcher, 27: 19--21.
[16]
Forte, A. & Gudial, M. (2005). Motivation and nonmajors in computer science: Identifying discrete audiences for introductory courses, IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(2): 248--253.
[17]
Freeman P. A. and Cuny J., (2005) Common Ground, A Diverse CS Community Benefits All of Us, Computing Research News, Vol. 17, No. 1, http://www.cra.org/CRN/articles/jan05/freeman.cuny.html
[18]
Fry, C. C. & Allgood, S. L. (2002). The effect of female student participation in the Society of Women Engineers on retention-a study at Baylor University, Dept. of Computer Science. Frontiers in Education, 2: 6--9.
[19]
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
[20]
Graham, S. and Latulipe, C. (2003). Computer science girls rock: Sparking interest in computer science and debunking the stereotypes. In Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp.322--326). New York, NY: ACM Press. Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/611892.611998
[21]
Hanson, L. L. (1996) Lost Talent, Women in the Sciences, Temple University Press,
[22]
Leggon, C. B. (2003) Women of Color in IT: Degree Trends and Policy Implications" IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Fall.
[23]
Margolis, J. & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[24]
Moorman, P. and Johnson, E. (2003). Still a stranger here: Attitudes among secondary school students towards computer science. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 193--197). New York, NY: ACM Press. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/961511.961564
[25]
Peckham, J., P. D. Stephenson, L. M. Encarnação, J -Y. Hervé, R. Hutt (2007). Increasing Student Retention in Computer Science through Research Programs for Undergraduates. In Proceedings of the Technical Symposium on Computer Science education (SIGCSE), Covington, Kentucky, USA, March 7-10, 2007.
[26]
Raghuram, P. (2004). Migration, gender, and the IT sector: Interesting debates. Women's Studies International Forum. 27(2): pp. 163--176.
[27]
Randall, C., Price, B., and Reichgelt, H. (2003). Women in computing programs: Does the incredible shrinking pipeline apply to all computing programs? SIGCSE Bul,. 35(4):55--59. Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/960492.960526
[28]
Rich, L., Perry, H., and Guzdial, M. (2004). A CS1 course designed to address interests of women. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 190--194). New York, NY: ACM Press. Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/971300.971370
[29]
Ridgeway, C. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57: 637--655.
[30]
Risman, B. (1998). Gender Vertigo: American Families in Transition. New Haven: Yale.
[31]
Risman, Barbara. 2004. Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society 18(4): 429--450.
[32]
Sadker, D. & Sadker, M. (1986). Sexism in the classroom: From grade school to graduate school. Phi Delta Kappan. 67: 358--361.
[33]
Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69: 21--51.
[34]
Steele, C. M. (1997). A Threat in the air: How Stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologies, 52, 613--629.
[35]
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797--811.
[36]
Stephenson, P. D., L. M. Encarnação, J. Peckham, J -Y. Hervé, R. Hutt (2007). Using Undergraduate Interdisciplinary Research to Promote Computer Science. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 22(3): 98--104.
[37]
Thomas, R. E., (1997). Problem-based learning: Measurable outcomes. Medical Education, 31, 320--329.
[38]
Treu, K. and Skinner, A. (2002). Ten suggestions for a gender-equitable computer science classroom. SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2): 165--167. Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/543812.543851
[39]
West, C. and Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125--151.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Creating Apps for Community and Social Good: Preliminary Learning Outcomes from a Middle School Computer Science CurriculumACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/365867424:3(1-26)Online publication date: 24-May-2024
  • (2021)Investigating the Role of Different Prep Pathways on CS2 Performance Across Three Different MajorsProceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Information Technology Education10.1145/3450329.3476851(141-146)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Exploring Approaches to Data Literacy Through a Critical Race Theory PerspectiveProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445141(1-15)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ITiCSE '07: Proceedings of the 12th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
June 2007
386 pages
ISBN:9781595936103
DOI:10.1145/1268784
  • cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
    ACM SIGCSE Bulletin  Volume 39, Issue 3
    Proceedings of the 12th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education (ITiCSE'07)
    September 2007
    366 pages
    ISSN:0097-8418
    DOI:10.1145/1269900
    Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 June 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. diversity
  2. education
  3. recruitment
  4. retention
  5. workforce

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

ITiCSE07
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

ITiCSE '07 Paper Acceptance Rate 62 of 210 submissions, 30%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

Upcoming Conference

ITiCSE '25
Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
June 27 - July 2, 2025
Nijmegen , Netherlands

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)63
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15
Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Creating Apps for Community and Social Good: Preliminary Learning Outcomes from a Middle School Computer Science CurriculumACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/365867424:3(1-26)Online publication date: 24-May-2024
  • (2021)Investigating the Role of Different Prep Pathways on CS2 Performance Across Three Different MajorsProceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Information Technology Education10.1145/3450329.3476851(141-146)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Exploring Approaches to Data Literacy Through a Critical Race Theory PerspectiveProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445141(1-15)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
  • (2020)A Data Science MajorProceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3328778.3366791(178-184)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2020
  • (2018)Fit-breaks: incorporating physical activity breaks in introductory CS lecturesProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3197091.3197115(260-265)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2018
  • (2018)Quantifying the Benefits of Prior Programming Experience in an Introductory Computer Science CourseProceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3159450.3159480(80-85)Online publication date: 21-Feb-2018
  • (2017)Enhancing Participation in Computer Science among Girls of ColorMoving Students of Color from Consumers to Producers of Technology10.4018/978-1-5225-2005-4.ch004(62-84)Online publication date: 2017
  • (2017)Evaluating an Alternative CS1 for Students with Prior Programming ExperienceProceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3017680.3017759(333-338)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2017
  • (2016)A first year seminar's impact on interest in computer scienceJournal of Computing Sciences in Colleges10.5555/3015063.301507632:2(83-89)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2016
  • (2016)An empirical investigation of student arrivals, departures, and persistence in computing majorsJournal of Computing Sciences in Colleges10.5555/2904298.290431331:5(77-84)Online publication date: 1-May-2016
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media