[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article
Open access

Bisimulation for Quantum Processes

Published: 01 December 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Quantum cryptographic systems have been commercially available, with a striking advantage over classical systems that their security and ability to detect the presence of eavesdropping are provable based on the principles of quantum mechanics. On the other hand, quantum protocol designers may commit more faults than classical protocol designers since human intuition is poorly adapted to the quantum world. To offer formal techniques for modeling and verification of quantum protocols, several quantum extensions of process algebra have been proposed. An important issue in quantum process algebra is to discover a quantum generalization of bisimulation preserved by various process constructs, in particular, parallel composition, where one of the major differences between classical and quantum systems, namely quantum entanglement, is present. Quite a few versions of bisimulation have been defined for quantum processes in the literature, but in the best case they are only proved to be preserved by parallel composition of purely quantum processes where no classical communication is involved.
Many quantum cryptographic protocols, however, employ the LOCC (Local Operations and Classical Communication) scheme, where classical communication must be explicitly specified. So, a notion of bisimulation preserved by parallel composition in the circumstance of both classical and quantum communication is crucial for process algebra approach to verification of quantum cryptographic protocols. In this article we introduce novel notions of strong bisimulation and weak bisimulation for quantum processes, and prove that they are congruent with respect to various process algebra combinators including parallel composition even when both classical and quantum communication are present. We also establish some basic algebraic laws for these bisimulations. In particular, we show the uniqueness of the solutions to recursive equations of quantum processes, which proves useful in verifying complex quantum protocols. To capture the idea that a quantum process approximately implements its specification, and provide techniques and tools for approximate reasoning, a quantified version of strong bisimulation, which defines for each pair of quantum processes a bisimulation-based distance characterizing the extent to which they are strongly bisimilar, is also introduced.

References

[1]
Abadi, M. and Gordon, A. D. 1997. A calculus for cryptographic protocols: The spi calculus. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security. ACM, 36--47.
[2]
Baier, C. and Hermanns, H. 1997. Weak bisimulation for fully probabilistic processes. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Aided Verification (CAV’97). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1254, Springer, 119--130.
[3]
Baier, C. and Kwiatkowska, M. 2000. Domain equations for probabilistic processes. Math. Struct. Comput. Sci. 10, 665--717.
[4]
Bennett, C. H. and Wiesner, S. J. 1992. Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 20, 2881--2884.
[5]
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crepeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., and Wootters, W. 1993. Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and EPR channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895--1899.
[6]
Deng, Y. and Du, W. 2011. Logical, metric, and algorithmic characterisations of probabilistic bisimulation. arxiv:1103.4577v1 {cs.lo}.
[7]
Deng, Y., Palamidessi, C., and Pang, J. 2005. Compositional reasoning for probabilistic finite-state behaviors. In Processes, Terms and Cycles: Steps on the Road to Infinity. 309--337.
[8]
Deng, Y., Chothia, T., Palamidessi, C., and Pang, J. 2006. Metrics for action-labelled quantitative transition systems1. Electron. Not. Theor. Comput. Sci. 153, 2, 79--96.
[9]
Deng, Y., van Glabbeek, R., Hennessy, M., Morgan, C., and Zhang, C. 2007. Remarks on testing probabilistic processes. Electron. Not. Theor. Comput. Sci. 172, 359--397.
[10]
Desharnais, J., Gupta, V., Jagadeesan, R., and Panangaden, P. 2002. Weak bisimulation is sound and complete for PCTL*. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR). 355--370.
[11]
Desharnais, J., Gupta, V., Jagadeesan, R., and Panangaden, P. 2004. Metrics for labelled markov processes. Theor. Comput. Sci. 318, 3, 323--354.
[12]
Desharnais, J., Gupta, V., Jagadeesan, R., and Panangaden, P. 2010. Weak bisimulation is sound and complete for PCTL*. Inf. Comput. 208, 2, 203--219.
[13]
Feng, Y., Duan, R., Ji, Z., and Ying, M. 2007. Probabilistic bisimulations for quantum processes. Inf. Comput. 205, 11, 1608--1639.
[14]
Feng, Y., Duan, R., and Ying, M. 2011. Bisimulations for quantum processes. In Proceedings of the 38th ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL’11), M. Sagiv Ed., 523--534.
[15]
Gay, S. J. and Nagarajan, R. 2005. Communicating quantum processes. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL). J. Palsberg and M. Abadi Eds., 145--157.
[16]
Giacalone, A., Jou, C., and Smolka, S. 1990. Algebraic reasoning for probabilistic concurrent systems. In Proceedings of the IFIP WG 2.2/2.3 Working Conference on Programming Concepts and Methods. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 443--458.
[17]
Grover, L. K. 1997. Quantum mechanics helps in searching for a needle in a haystack. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2, 325.
[18]
Hennessy, M. 1991. A proof system for communicating processes with value-passing. Formal Aspects of Comput. Sci. 3, 346--366.
[19]
Hennessy, M. and Ingólfsdóttir, A. 1993. A theory of communicating processes with value-passing. Inf. Comput. 107, 2, 202--236.
[20]
Jorrand, P. and Lalire, M. 2004. Toward a quantum process algebra. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Quantum Programming Languages. P. Selinger Ed., 111.
[21]
Kitaev, A. 1997. Quantum computations: Algorithms and error correction. Russ. Math. Surv. 52, 6, 1191--1249.
[22]
Kraus, K. 1983. States, Effects and Operations: Fundamental Notions of Quantum Theory. Springer, Berlin.
[23]
Lalire, M. 2006. Relations among quantum processes: Bisimilarity and congruence. Math. Struct. Comput. Sci. 16, 3, 407--428.
[24]
Milner, R. 1989. Communication and Concurrency. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
[25]
Milner, R., Parrow, J., and Walker, D. 1992. A calculus of mobile processes, parts I and II. Inf. Comput. 100, 1--77.
[26]
Nielsen, M. and Chuang, I. 2000. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press.
[27]
Shor, P. W. 1994. Algorithms for quantum computation: Discrete log and factoring. In Proceedings of the 35th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’94). 124--134.
[28]
van Breugel, F. 2010. http://www.sti.uniurb.it/events/sfm10qapl/slides/franck-part1.pdf.
[29]
von Neumann, J. 1955. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
[30]
Ying, M., Feng, Y., Duan, R., and Ji, Z. 2009. An algebra of quantum processes. ACM Trans. Comput. Logic 10, 3, 1--36.
[31]
Ying, M. S. 2001. Topology in Process Calculus: Approximate Correctness and Infinite Evolution of Concurrent Programs. Springer New York.
[32]
Ying, M. S. 2002. Bisimulation indexes and their applications. Theor. Comput. Sci. 275, 1--68.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Reviews

Wolfgang Schreiner

Quantum cryptography enables provably secure communication based on the principles of quantum mechanics [1]. However, research is hampered by the lack of good formalisms for modeling and verifying quantum protocols. One possible approach is based on extensions of process algebras, such as Milner's calculus of communicating systems (CCS), which are used to model and analyze communication and concurrency in classical systems. This paper presents a quantum process algebra, qCCS, that extends CCS by primitives for quantum communication, operator application, and measurement. After defining the syntax and operational semantics of qCCS and demonstrating its use by modeling several quantum protocols, the presentation proceeds along the lines of CCS: first, a notion of strong bisimulation of quantum processes is introduced, and the corresponding equivalence relation is shown to be a congruence, that is, preserved by all the combinators of qCCS. Then, a notion of weak bisimulation is defined that does not discriminate between internal actions. While the corresponding equivalence itself is not preserved by summation, a notion of process equality can be derived that is again a congruence. Furthermore, a notion of approximate strong bisimulation is introduced that captures the inherent imprecision of quantum processes and is more suitable in practice. While the quantum aspects of the work are hard to digest for the layman, the reader familiar with process algebra will enjoy the correspondence of concepts known from a classical setting with those in the quantum world. An envisioned extension of the work to model and analyze security properties (analogous to the Spi calculus) promises interesting future results. Online Computing Reviews Service

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems  Volume 34, Issue 4
December 2012
117 pages
ISSN:0164-0925
EISSN:1558-4593
DOI:10.1145/2400676
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2012
Accepted: 01 November 2012
Revised: 01 March 2012
Received: 01 April 2011
Published in TOPLAS Volume 34, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Quantum communication
  2. bisimulation
  3. congruence
  4. quantum computing
  5. quantum process algebra

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)91
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)22
Reflects downloads up to 12 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Quantum Bisimilarity via Barbs and Contexts: Curbing the Power of Non-deterministic ObserversProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36328858:POPL(1269-1297)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
  • (2024)ReferencesFoundations of Quantum Programming10.1016/B978-0-44-315942-8.00030-7(435-447)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)ProspectsFoundations of Quantum Programming10.1016/B978-0-44-315942-8.00027-7(367-373)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Distributed quantum programsFoundations of Quantum Programming10.1016/B978-0-44-315942-8.00022-8(263-289)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Quantum Bisimilarity Is a Congruence Under Physically Admissible SchedulersProgramming Languages and Systems10.1007/978-981-97-8943-6_9(176-195)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Testing Quantum ProcessesLeveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. REoCAS Colloquium in Honor of Rocco De Nicola10.1007/978-3-031-73709-1_9(132-151)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Model-Based Testing of Quantum ComputationsTests and Proofs10.1007/978-3-031-72044-4_7(127-147)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Challenges for Quantum Software Engineering: An Industrial Application Scenario PerspectiveQuantum Software10.1007/978-3-031-64136-7_12(311-335)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2024
  • (2022)Verification of Distributed Quantum ProgramsACM Transactions on Computational Logic10.1145/351714523:3(1-40)Online publication date: 6-Apr-2022
  • (2022)Encodability Criteria for Quantum Based SystemsFormal Techniques for Distributed Objects, Components, and Systems10.1007/978-3-031-08679-3_10(151-169)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media