[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geospatial assessment of soil erosion vulnerability at watershed level in some sections of the Upper Subarnarekha river basin, Jharkhand, India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Undulating landscapes of Chhotanagpur plateau of the Indian state of Jharkhand suffer from soil erosion vulnerability of varying degrees. An investigation was undertaken in some sections of the Upper Subarnarekha River Basin falling within this state. An empirical equation known as Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) was utilized for estimating the soil loss. Analysis of remote sensing satellite data, digital elevation model (DEM) and geographical information system (GIS)–based geospatial approach together with USLE led to the soil erosion assessment. Erosion vulnerability assessment was performed by analyzing raster grids of topography acquired from Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Global DEM data. LANDSAT TM and ETM+ satellite data of March 2001 and March 2011 were used for inferring the land use–land cover characteristics of the watershed for these years, respectively. USLE equation was computed within the GIS framework to derive annual soil erosion rates and also the areas with varying degrees of erosion vulnerability. Erosion vulnerability units thus identified covered five severity classes of erosion ranging from very low (0–5 ton ha−1 yr−1) to very severe (> 40 ton ha−1 yr−1). Results indicated an overall increase of erosion in the year 2011 as compared to the erosion computed for the year 2001. Maximum soil erosion rate during the year 2001 was found up to 40 ton ha−1 yr−1, whereas this went up to 49.80 ton ha−1 yr−1 for the year 2011. Factors for the increase in overall erosion could be variation in rainfall, decrease in vegetation or protective land covers and most important but not limited to the increase in built-up or impervious areas as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali S, Sharda VN (2005) Evaluation of the universal soil loss equation (USLE) in semi-arid and sub-humid climates of India. Appl Eng Agric 21:217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen DG (1970) Effects of urban development of floods in Northern Virginia. US Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2001-C. p 26

  • Anonymous (1986) Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Technical Release 55. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Conservation Engineering Division, USDA

  • Anonymous (1990) Impacts of changes in hydrology due to urbanization. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Watershed Management Unit, Water Division—Region V, Chicago, IL

  • Arnold CL, Gibbons CJ (1996) Impervious surface coverage—the emergence of a key environmental indicator. J Am Plan Assoc 62(2):243–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett B, Franco B (2004) Impervious cover and erosion, A study of the effects of the increase in impervious cover on soil loss and erosion in Brushy Creek resulting from the opening of the Dell headquarters and the subsequent population boom in Round Rock, Texas, GRG 360-G

  • Baskan O, Hicrettin C, Suat A, Gunay E (2010) Conditional simulation of USLE/RUSLE soil erodibility factor by geostatistics in a mediterranean catchment, Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 60:1179–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathrellos G, Skilodimou H (2007) Using the analytic hierarchy process to create an erosion risk map—a case study in Malakasiotiko stream, Trikala prefecture. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, vol XXXX, pp 1904–1915

  • Benkobi L, Trlica MJ, Smith JL (1994) Evaluation of a redefined surface cover sub-factor for use in RUSLE. J Range Manag 47:74–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bez PK (2011) Watershed characterization for assessing erosional behavior through geoinformatics. M.Tech. (Remote Sensing) Thesis (unpubl.), Birla Institute of Technology (BIT), Mesra, India

  • Biesemans J, Meirvenne MV, Gabriels D (2000) Extending the RUSLE with the Monte Carlo error propagation technique to predict long-term average on-site sediment accumulation. J Soil Water Conserv 55:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Cablk ME, Perlow LM (2006) A classification system for impervious cover in the Lake Tahoe Basin. Project Number 2004NV57B, Report of Nevada Water Resources Research Institute

  • Carter WR (1961) Magnitude and frequency of floods in suburban areas.US Geological Survey Professional Paper 424-B: B9-11

  • Cebecauer T, Hofierka J (2008) The consequences of land-cover changes on soil erosion distribution in Slovakia. Geomorphology 98:187–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen T, Niu R-q, Li P-x, Zhang L-p, Du B (2010) Regional soil erosion risk mapping using RUSLE, GIS, and remote sensing: a case study in Miyun watershed, North China. Environ Earth Sci (Online). doi:10.1007/s12665-010-0715-z

  • Chou WC (2010) Modeling watershed scale soil loss prediction and sediment yield estimation. Water Resour Manage 24(10):2075–2090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Mar LT, Mitchel Aide T, Scatena FN (1998) The effect of land use on soil erosion in the Guadiana watershed in Puerto Rico. Carib J Sci 34:298–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunjo G, Pardini G, Gispert M (2004) The role of land use–land cover on runoff generation and sediment yield at a microplot scale, in a small Mediterranean catchment. J Arid Environ 57:99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiumnoh A (2000) Integration of geographic information systems (GIS) and satellite remote sensing (SRS) for watershed management. Technical Bulletin 150, Food and Fertilizer Technology Center, Taiwan

  • El-Swaify SA, Arsyad S, Krishnarajah P (1983) Soil erosion by water. In: The handbook on natural systems information for planners. The MacMillan Co. Inc., New York, pp 99–161

  • Erencin Z (2000) C-factor mapping using remote sensing and GIS—a case study of LOM Sak/Lom Kao, Thailand: [Dissertation]. International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC), Holland

  • Favis-Mortlock D, Boardman J (1995) Non-linear responses of soil erosion to climate change: a modeling study on the UK South Downs. Catena 25:365–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez JM (2009) Measures against soil erosion in Spain. SCAPE, Soil Conservation and Protection for Europe, pp 51–54

  • Field R, Masters H, Singer M (1982) Porous pavement: research, development, and demonstration. J Transp Eng 108(3):244–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster GR, McCool DK, Renard KG, Moldenhauer WC (1981) Conversion of the universal soil loss equation to SI metric units. J Soil Water Conserv 36(6):355–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitas IZ, Douros K, Minakou1 C, Silleos GN, Karydas CG (2009) Multi-temporal soil erosion risk assessment in N. Chalkidiki using a modified USLE raster model. In: EARSEL e-proceedings 8-1/2009, pp 40–52

  • Goldman SJ, Jackson K, Bursztynsky TA (1986) Erosion and sediment control handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall MJ (1984) Urban hydrology. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer TR (1972) Stream channel enlargement due to urbanization. Water Resour Res 8:1530–1540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harbor J (1994) A practical method for estimating the impact of land use change on surface runoff, groundwater recharge and wetland hydrology. J Am Plan Assoc 60:91–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartcher MG, Post DA, Kinsey-Henderson AE (2005) Uncertainty in modeling the sources and sinks of suspended sediment in the Mae Chaem Catchment, Thailand. In: Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on simulation and modelling, pp 418–425

  • Hemrom S (2007) Soil erosion assessment by USLE at watershed level for impact of land use changes: a geoinformatics approach. M.Tech. (Remote Sensing) Thesis (unpubl.), Birla Institute of Technology (BIT), Mesra, India

  • Hollis GE, Luckett JK (1976) The response of natural river channels to urbanization: two case studies from southeast England. J Hydrol 30:351–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibitoye M, Eludoyin A (2010) Land exposure and soil erosion in part of humid region of Southwest Nigeria. FIG Congress, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabbar MT (2003) Application of GIS to estimate soil erosion using RUSLE. Geo-spatial Inf Sci 6(1):34–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasrotia AS, Singh R (2006) Modeling runoff and soil erosion in a catchment area using GIS in Himalayan region, India. Environ Geol 51:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeje LK (1988) Soil erosion characteristics, processes and extent in the lowland rainforest area of southwestern Nigeria. In: Sagua VO, Enabor EE, Ofomata GEK, Ologe KO, Oyebande L (eds) Ecological disaster in Nigeria: soil erosion. Federal Ministry of Science and Technology, Lagos, pp 69–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeje LK (2005) Urbanization and accelerated erosion: the case of Effon-Alaaye in South western Nigeria. Seminar Paper. Department of Geography, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria

  • Jordan G, van Rompaey A, Szilassi P, Csillag G, Mannaerts C, Woldai T (2006) Historical land use changes and their impact on sediment fluxes in the Balaton basin (Hungary). Agric Ecosyst Environ 108:119–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kefi M, Yoshino K, Setiawan Y, Zayani K, Boufaroua M (2011) Assessment of the effects of vegetation on soil erosion risk by water: a case study of the Batta watershed in Tunisia. Environ Earth Sci 64:707–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MA, Gupta VP, Moharana PC (2001) Watershed prioritization using remote sensing and geographical information system: a case study from Guhiya, India. J Arid Environ 49:465–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna AP (1996a) Land cover change dynamics of a Himalayan watershed utilizing Indian Remote Sensing Satellite (IRS) data. In: Proceedings of IEEE/GRSS International Geosciences and Remote Sensing Symposium 1996 (IGARSS96), Nebraska, USA, vol I, pp 221–223

  • Krishna AP (1996b) Remote sensing approach for watershed based resources management priorities in the Sikkim Himalaya—a case study. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 24(2):69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna Bahadur KC (2009) Mapping soil erosion susceptibility using remote sensing and GIS: a case of the Upper Nam Wa Watershed, Nan Province, Thailand. Environ Geol 57:695–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna AP, Hemrom S (2008) Utilisation of Indian Remote Sensing Satellite (IRS) data for assessment of soil erosion process of a watershed in Chhotanagpur plateau region. In: 37th Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) Scientific Assembly (July 13–20, 2008), Session on Space Data Utilization for Earth, Montreal, Canada (abs.), p 1620. http://www.cospar-assembly.org/admin/congress_overview.php?sessionid=1

  • Krishna AP, Rai LK (1996) GIS and remote sensing for natural resources management at watershed level in the mountain environment: a conceptual approach. Asian-Pacific Remote Sens GIS J 9:93–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazaro TR (1990) Urban hydrology, a multidisciplinary perspective. Technomic Publishing Company, Lancaster

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW (1999) Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, 4th edn. Wiley. ISBN 9971-51-427-3

  • Lin CY, Lin WT, Chou WC (2002) Soil erosion prediction and sediment yield estimation: the Taiwan experience. Soil Tillage Res 68:143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu D, Li G, Valladares GS, Batistella M (2004) Mapping soil erosion risk in Rondonia, Brazilian Amazonia using RUSLE, remote sensing and GIS. Land Degrad Dev 15:499–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoudi B, Bakhtiari F, Hamidifar M, Danehkar A (2010) Effects of land use change and erosion on physical and chemical properties of water (Karkhe Watershed). Int J Environ Res 4(2):217–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Maria Soupios P, Vallianatos F (2009) Soil erosion prediction using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) in a GIS framework, Chania, Northwestern Crete, Greece. Environ Geol 57:483–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martha MB, Gerard G, van Anne D, Fabien Q, Dimitris C, Mark R (2008) The response of soil erosion and sediment export to land-use change in four areas of Europe: the importance of landscape pattern. Geomorphology 98:213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell SK, Schmidt GL, Storey JC (2007) A multi-scale segmentation approach to filling gaps in Landsat ETM+ SLC-off images. Int J Remote Sens 28(23):5339–5356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt WS (2002) Biophysical considerations in integrated catchment management: a modeling system for Northern Thailand. Doctor in Philosophy Thesis, Australian National University

  • Millward AA, Mersey JE (1999) Adapting the RUSLE to model soil erosion potential in a mountainous tropical watershed. Catena 38(2):109–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra S, Nagarajan R (2010) Morphometric analysis and prioritization of sub-watersheds using GIS and remote sensing techniques: a case study of Odisha, India. Int J Geomat Geosci 1(3):501–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC (1995) Soil erosion and conservation. Longman 198

  • Moscrip AL, Montgomery DR (1997) Urbanization flood, frequency and salmon abundance in Puget Lowlan Streams. J Am Water Resour Assoc 33(6):1289–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narain P, Khybri ML, Tomar HPS, Sindhwal NS (1994) Estimation of runoff, soil loss and USLE parameters for Doon Valley. Indian J Soil Conserv 22:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Nearing MA, Jetten V, Baffaut C, Cerdan O, Couturier A, Hernandez M et al (2005) Modeling response of soil erosion and runoff to changes in precipitation and cover. Catena 61:131–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neil Munro R, Deckers J, Haile M, Grove AT, Poesen J, Nyssen J (2008) Soil landscapes, land cover change and erosion features of the Central Plateau region of Tigrai, Ethiopia: photo-monitoring with an interval of 30 years. Catena 75:55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neller RJ (1988) A comparison of channel erosion in small urban and rural catchments, Armidale, New South Wales. Earth Surf Process Landf 13:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ni SX, Ma GB, Wei YC, Jiang HF (2004) An indicator system for assessing soil erosion in the Loess Plateau gully regions: a case study in the Wangdonggou watershed of China. Pedosphere 14:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal B, Samanta S, Pal DK (2012) Morphometric and hydrological analysis and mapping for Watut watershed using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Int J Adv Eng Technol. ISSN: 2231-1963

  • Piccarreta M, Capolongo D, Boenzi F, Bentivenga M (2006) Implications of decadal changes in precipitation and land use policy to soil erosion in Basilicata, Italy. Catena 65:138–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pringle MJ, Schmidt M, Muir JS (2009) Geostatistical interpolation of SLC-off Landsat ETM+ images. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 64(6):654–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruski FF, Nearing MA (2002) Runoff and soil loss responses to changes in precipitation: a computer simulation study. J Soil Water Conserv 57:7–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao YP (1981) Evaluation of cropping management factor in universal soil loss equation under natural rainfall condition of Kharagpur, India. In: Proceedings of the Southeast Asian Regional Symposium on Problems of Soil Erosion and Sedimentation, Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), Bangkok, pp 241–254

  • Ritchie JC, Seyfried MS (1997) Airborne laser altimeter applications to water management. In: Baumgartner M, Schultz GA, Johnson AI (eds), Remote sensing and geographic information systems for design and operation of water resources systems, International Association of Hydrological Sciences Publication No. 242, pp. 221–228

  • Schwab G, Fangmeier D, Elliot W, Frevert R (1992) Soil and water conservation engineering, 4th edn. Wiley, New York. ISBN-10: 0471574902, ISBN-13: 9780471574903

  • Sharda VN, Ali S (2008) Evaluation of the universal soil loss equation in semi-arid and sub-humid climates of India using stage dependent C-factor. Indian J Agric Sci 78:422–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma E, Sundriyal RC, Rai SC, Krishna AP (1998) Watershed: a functional unit of management for sustainable development. In: Ambasht RS (ed) Modern trends in ecology and environment. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 171–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinde V, Sharma A, Tiwari KN, Singh M (2011) Quantitative determination of soil erosion and prioritization of micro-watersheds using remote sensing and GIS. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 39(2):181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siyuan W, Jingshi L, Cunjian Y (2007) Temporal change in the landscape erosion pattern in the Yellow River Basin, China. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 21:1077–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, ED (NB21F-05) (2005) Effect of increases in peak flows and imperviousness on stream morphology of ephemeral streams in Southern California. North American Benthological Society

  • Storey J, Scaramuzza P, Schmidt G, Barsi J (2005) Landsat 7 scan line corrector-off gap filled product development. In: Proceedings of Pecora 16 global priorities in land remote sensing, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, pp 23–27

  • Szilassi P, Jordan G, Rompaey A, Csillag G (2008) Impacts of historical land use changes on erosion and agricultural soil properties in the Kali Basin at Lake Balaton, Hungary. Catena 68:96–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari PC (2000) Land use changes in the Himalaya and their impact on the plains ecosystem: need for sustainable land use. Land Use Policy 17:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA-SCS (1972) ‘Hydrology’ in SCS national engineering handbook, section 4. US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rompaey A, Govers G, Puttemans C (2002) Modeling land use changes and their impact on soil erosion and sediment supply to rivers. Earth Surf Process Landf 27(5):481–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rompaey A, Bazzoffi P, Jones RJA, Montanarella L (2005) Modeling sediment yields in Italian catchments. Geomorphology 65:157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrieling A (2006) Satellite remote sensing for water erosion assessment: a review. Catena 65:2–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrieling A (2007) Mapping erosion from space. Doctoral Thesis, Wageningen University. ISBN: 978-90-8504-587-8

  • Wang G, Gertner G, Fang S, Anderson AB (2003) Mapping multiple variables for predicting soil loss by geostatistical methods with TM images and a slope map. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69:889–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward PJ (2009) Revised estimate of River Meuse suspended sediment yield in the 20th century: decreasing rather than increasing. Neth J Geosci 87:189–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Weesies GA (1998) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). Agriculture Handbook No. 703, Washington DC, USA

  • Wischmeier WH (1959) A rainfall erosion index for a universal soil-loss equation. Soil Sci Soc Am J Abstr 23(3):246–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses—a guide to conservation planning. Handbook No. 537, US Department of Agriculture, USA

  • Yang D, Kanae S, Oki T, Koike T, Musiake K (2003) Global potential soil erosion with reference to land use and climate changes. Hydrol Process 17(2913):2928

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh AGO, Li X (1999) Economic development and agricultural land loss in the Pearl River Delta, China. Habitat Int 23(3):373–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Li W, Travis D (2007) Gaps-fill of SLC-off Landsat ETM+ satellite image using a geostatistical approach. Int J Remote Sens 28(22):5103–5122

    Article  Google Scholar 

Websites

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author is thankful to the CIFRI, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Kolkata, and also to the Birla Institute of Technology (BIT), Mesra for all the facilities made available and availed for the work as a Research Scholar. Dr. S. K. Sahu and Miss Manisha Bhor of CIFRI (ICAR), Kolkata, are acknowledged for their time to time help. Satellite digital data available from USGS Global Land Cover Facility and used in this study is also duly acknowledged. Authors gratefully acknowledge the anonymous reviewers for providing their critical comments to improve the quality of this manuscript. Authors are also thankful to Dr. Gunter Doerhoefer, Editor-in-Chief, of the journal toward improvements in the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuvabrata Chatterjee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chatterjee, S., Krishna, A.P. & Sharma, A.P. Geospatial assessment of soil erosion vulnerability at watershed level in some sections of the Upper Subarnarekha river basin, Jharkhand, India. Environ Earth Sci 71, 357–374 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2439-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2439-3

Keywords

Navigation