Abstract
Damage to petals may have varying effects on the reproductive success of the plant. The variation may depend on the kind of damage to the corolla. Whether the damage is limited to the corolla, as is usually the case with nectar-robbing perforations, or extending to the reproductive parts of the flower, as in the case of florivory holes, might determine the extent of the effect on the plant’s reproduction. We examined the various perforations in the flowers of Arctostaphylos pungens and correlated their presence with fruiting success. We found that though florivory holes were highly associated with damage to reproductive parts, fruiting success did not differ significantly between flowers with the two kinds of damage. Although nectar-robbing perforations were not associated with reduced number of fruit produced, they were significantly correlated with reduced number of fruit that contained seemingly viable seeds. The implications of our findings are discussed in the context of pollination and antagonism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akamatsu Y, Sugita N, Ueda K (2011) Nectar robbing from Hibiscus flowers by white-eyes on an oceanic island, Chichi-jima, Bonin Islands. Jpn J Ornithol 60:228–232
Armbruster WS, Guinn DA (1989) The solitary bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) of interior and arctic Alaska: flower associations, habitat use, and phenology. J Kansas Entomol Soc 62:468–483
Barrows EM (1980) Robbing of exotic plants by introduced carpenter and honey bees in Hawaii, with comparative notes. Biotropica 12:23–29
Botto-Mahan C, Ramirez PA, Ossa CG, Medel R, Ojeda-Camacho M, Gonzalez AV (2011) Floral herbivory affects female reproductive success and pollinator visitation in the perennial herb Alstroemeria Ligtu (alstroemeriaceae). Int J Plant Sci 172:1130–1136
Brody AK (1992) Oviposition choices by a pre-dispersal seed predator (Hylemya sp.). Oecologia 91:56–62
Burkle LA, Irwin RE, Newman DA (2007) Predicting the effects of nectar robbing on plant reproduction: implications of pollen limitation and plant mating system. Am J Bot 94:1935–1943
Cardel YJ, Koptur S (2010) Effects of florivory on the pollination of flowers: an experimental field study with a perennial plant. Int J Plant Sci 171:283–292
Cascante-Marin A, Wolf JHD, Oostermeijer JGB (2009) Wasp florivory decreases reproductive success in an epiphytic bromeliad. Plant Ecol 203:149–153
Eliyahu D, McCall AC, Lauck M, Trakhtenbrot A, Bronstein JL (2015) Minute pollinators: the role of thrips (Thysanoptera) as pollinators of pointleaf manzanita Arctostaphylos pungens (Ericaceae). J Pollinat Ecol 16:64–71
Ferreira CA, Torezan-Silingardi HM (2013) Implications of the floral herbivory on Malpighiacea plant fitness: visual aspect of the flower affects the attractiveness to pollinators. Sociobiology 60:323–328
García-Fayos P, Goldarazena A (2008) The role of thrips in pollination of Arctostaphyllos uva-ursi. Int J Plant Sci 169:776–781
Goodwillie C, Ritland C, Ritland K (2006) The genetic basis of floral traits associated with mating system evolution in Leptosiphon (Polemoniaceae): an analysis of quantitative trait loci. Evolution 60:491–504
Irwin RE (2009) Realized tolerance to nectar robbing: compensation to floral enemies in Ipomopsis aggregata. Ann Bot 103:1425–1433
Irwin RE, Adler LS, Brody AK (2004) The dual role of floral traits: pollinator attraction and plant defense. Ecology 85:1503–1511
Irwin RE, Bronstein JL, Manson JS, Richardson L (2010) Nectar robbing: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 4:271–292
Kaczorowski RL, Koplovich A, Sporer F, Wink M, Markman S (2014) Immediate effects of nectar robbing by Palestine sunbirds (Nectarinia osea) on nectar alkaloid concentrations in tree tobacco (Nicotiana glauca). J Chem Ecol 40:325–330
Kawagoe T, Kudoh H (2010) Escape from floral herbivory by early flowering in Arabidopsis halleri subsp. gemmifera. Oecologia 164:713–720
Kessler D, Diezel C, Clark DG, Colquhoun TA, Baldwin IT (2013) Petunia flowers solve the defence/apparency dilemma of pollinator attraction by deploying complex floral blends. Ecol Lett 16:299–306
Leonard AS, Brent J, Papaj DR, Dornhaus A (2013) Floral nectar guide patterns discourage nectar robbing by bumble bees. PLoS ONE 8:e55914
Liao K, Gituru RW, Guo YH, Wang QF (2013) Effects of floral herbivory on foraging behaviour of bumblebees and female reproductive success in Pedicularis gruina (Orobanchaceae). Flora 208:562–569
Mayer C, Dehon C, Gauthier AL, Naveau O, Rigo C, Jacquemart AL (2014) Nectar robbing improves male reproductive success of the endangered Aconitum napellus ssp. lusitanicum. Evol Ecol 28:669–685
McCall AC (2006) Natural and artificial floral damage induces resistance in Nemophila menziesii (Hydrophyllaceae) flowers. Oikos 112:660–666
McCall AC, Barr CM (2012) Why do florivores prefer hermaphrodites over females in Nemophila menziesii (Boraginaceae)? Oecologia 170:147–157
McCall AC, Irwin RE (2006) Florivory: the intersection of pollination and herbivory. Ecol Lett 9:1351–1365
Moisset B, Buchmann SL (2010) Bee basics: an introduction to our native bees. USDA, Washington DC
Navarro L (2001) Reproductive biology and effect of nectar robbing on fruit production in Macleania bullata (Ericaceae). Plant Ecol 152:59–65
R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/.
Richardson L (1999) Mutualist and antagonist flower visitors: A pollination study of two species of manzanita (Arctostaphylos: Ericaceae). University of Arizona, Thesis
Richardson L, Bronstein JL (2012) Reproductive biology of pointleaf manzanita (Arctostaphylos pungens) and the pollinator-nectar robber spectrum. J Pollinat Ecol 9:115–123
Singh VK, Barman C, Tandon R (2014) Nectar robbing positively influences the reproductive success of Tecomella undulata (Bignoniaceae). PLoS ONE 9:e102607
Sober V, Moora M, Teder T (2010) Florivores decrease pollinator visitation in a self-incompatible plant. Basic Appl Ecol 11:669–675
Stanton ML, Preston RE (1988) Ecological consequences and phenotypic correlates of petal size variation in wild radish, Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 75:528–539
Teixido AL, Mendez M, Valladares F (2011) Flower size and longevity influence florivory in the large-flowered shrub Cistus ladanifer. Acta Oecol 37:418–421
Tsuji K, Sota T (2010) Sexual differences in flower defense and correlated male-biased florivory in a plant-florivore system. Oikos 119:1848–1853
Vega-Frutis R, Munguia-Rosas MA, Varga S, Kytoviita MM (2013) Sex-specific patterns of antagonistic and mutualistic biotic interactions in dioecious and gynodioecious plants. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 15:45–55
Willmer P (2011) Pollination and floral ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Wise MJ, Hebert JB (2010) Herbivores affect natural selection for floral-sex ratio in a field population of horsenettle, Solanum carolinense. Ecology 91:937–943
Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR (2009) Effects of florivory on floral volatile emissions and pollination success in the wild parsnip. Arthropod Plant Interact 3:181–191
Acknowledgments
We would like to extend a special thank you to Nicole Rafferty and Emily McCall for their help with field work and data collection. We also appreciate valuable comments from Judith Bronstein and Carolyn McSherry on earlier versions of this manuscript. We thank Michele Lanan for providing the photograph for Figure 1a. Members and associates of the Bronstein laboratory provided helpful comments throughout the research. Funding was provided by Denison University to ACM and by the Center for Insect Science, at the University of Arizona, through NIH Training Grant #1 K12 GM000708 to DE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling Editor: Kristine Nemec.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eliyahu, D., McCall, A.C., Lauck, M. et al. Florivory and nectar-robbing perforations in flowers of pointleaf manzanita Arctostaphylos pungens (Ericaceae) and their effects on plant reproductive success. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 9, 613–622 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-015-9399-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-015-9399-3