Product and process innovation in manufacturing firms: a 30-year bibliometric analysis

• Aas, T. H., Breunig, K. J., Hydle, K. M., & Pedersen, P. E. (2015). Innovation management practices in production-intensive service firms. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(05), 1550055.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Adner, R., & Levinthal, D. (2001). Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: Implications for product and process innovation. Management Science, 47(5), 611–628.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Al, U., Taşkın, Z., & Düzyol, G. (2012). Use of social network analysis in bibliometric researches. BOBCATSSS 2012, 20th International Conference on Information Science, Amsterdam, 23–25 January 2012, BOCK+HERCHEN Verlag: Bad Honnef.

• Alegre, J., & Chiva, R. (2008). Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test. Technovation, 28(6), 315–326.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2005). Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: Evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey. Technovation, 25(3), 245–259.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Amin, M., & Mabe, M. (2004). Impact factors: Use and abuse. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 1(1), 1.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Antonioli, D., Mancinelli, S., & Mazzanti, M. (2013). Is environmental innovation embedded within high-performance organisational changes? The role of human resource management and complementarity in green business strategies. Research Policy, 42(4), 975–988.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Appio, F. P., Martini, A., Massa, S., & Testa, S. (2016). Unveiling the intellectual origins of Social Media-based innovation: Insights from a bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 108(1), 355–388.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609–626). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

• Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (1997). Location, agglomeration and innovation: Towards regional innovation systems in Norway? European Planning Studies, 5(3), 299–330.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54(15), 2787–2805.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Becheikh, N., Landry, R., & Amara, N. (2006). Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993 to 2003. Technovation, 26(5), 644–664.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bendixen, M., & Sandler, M. (1995). Converting verbal scales to interval scales using correspondence analysis. Management Dynamics: Contemporary Research, 4(1), 32–50.

  Google Scholar 

• Bi, Z. M., Lang, S. Y., Shen, W., & Wang, L. (2008). Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: The state of the art. International Journal of Production Research, 46(4), 967–992.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.

  Google Scholar 

• Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343–378.

  Google Scholar 

• Buffington, J. (2016). The future of manufacturing: An end to mass production. In Frictionless markets (pp. 49–65). Berlin: Springer.

• Camisón-Zornoza, C., Lapiedra-Alcamí, R., Segarra-Ciprés, M., & Boronat-Navarro, M. (2004). A meta-analysis of innovation and organizational size. Organization Studies, 25(3), 331–361.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Caputo, A., Marzi, G., & Pellegrini, M. M. (2016). The internet of things in manufacturing innovation processes: Development and application of a conceptual framework. Business Process Management Journal, 22(2), 383–402.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Castellacci, F. (2008). Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation. Research Policy, 37(6), 978–994.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chang, Y. W., Huang, M. H., & Lin, C. W. (2015). Evolution of research subjects in library and information science based on keyword, bibliographical coupling, and co-citation analyses. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2071–2087.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product development and performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Coe, D. T., & Helpman, E. (1995). International r&d spillovers. European Economic Review, 39(5), 859–887.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Czapski, G. (1997). The use of deciles of the citation impact to evaluate different fields of research in Israel. Scientometrics, 40(3), 437–443.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dabic, M., González-Loureiro, M., & Furrer, O. (2014). Research on the strategy of multinational enterprises: Key approaches and new avenues. Business Research Quarterly, 17(2), 129–148.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gonzalez-Loureiro, M., Dabić, M., & Kiessling, T. (2015). Supply chain management as the key to a firm’s strategy in the global marketplace: Trends and research agenda. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 45(1/2), 159–181.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dabic, M., González-Loureiro, M., & Harvey, M. (2015). Evolving research on expatriates: What is ‘known’after four decades (1970–2012). The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(3), 316–337.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Daft, R. L. (1978). A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), 193–210.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Damanpour, F. (1987). The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors. Journal of Management, 13(4), 675–688.

• Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. The Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Davies, A. (2004). Moving base into high-value integrated solutions: A value stream approach. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(5), 727–756.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• De Leeuw, J., & Mair, P. (2009). Gifi methods for optimal scaling in R: The package homals. Journal of Statistical Software, 31(4), 1–20.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Pizzurno, E., & Cassia, L. (2015). Product innovation in family versus nonfamily firms: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 1–36.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422–1433.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Drucker, P. (1994). Innovation and entrepreneurship (2nd ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

  Google Scholar 

• Duy, J., & Vaughan, L. (2006). Can electronic journal usage data replace citation data as a measure of journal use? An empirical examination. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(5), 512–517.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Engelbrecht, H. J. (1997). International R&D spillovers, human capital and productivity in OECD economies: An empirical investigation. European Economic Review, 41(8), 1479–1488.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., & O’Keefe, R. D. (1984). Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Science, 30(6), 682–695.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M., & Sapprasert, K. (2012). Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41, 1132–1153.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Furrer, O., Thomas, H., & Goussevskaia, A. (2008). The structure and evolution of the strategic management field: A content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 1–23.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2), 110–132.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Jama, 295(1), 90–93.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Garfield, E., & Pudovkin, A. (2015). journal impact factor strongly correlates with the citedness of the median journal paper. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 9(1), 5–14.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gifi, A. (1990). Nonlinear multivariate analysis. Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• González-Loureiro, M., Dabic, M., & Furrer, O. (2015). A content and comparative analysis of strategic management research in the Baltic area. Baltic Journal of Management, 10(2), 243–266.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Guellec, D., & de la Potterie, B. V. P. (2001). The internationalisation of technology analysed with patent data. Research Policy, 30(8), 1253–1266.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hall, C. M., & Page, S. J. (2015). Following the impact factor: Utilitarianism or academic compliance? Tourism Management, 51, 309–312.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hobday, M. (2005). Firm-level innovation models: perspectives on research in developed and developing countries. Technology analysis and strategic management, 17(2), 121–146.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hoffman, D. L., & De Leeuw, J. (1992). Interpreting multiple correspondence analysis as a multidimensional scaling method. Marketing Letters, 3(3), 259–272.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hofmann, M., & Klinkenberg, R. (2013). RapidMiner: Data mining use cases and business analytics applications. Florida: CRC Press.

• Holmström, J., Holweg, M., Khajavi, S. H., & Partanen, J. (2016). The direct digital manufacturing (r) evolution: Definition of a research agenda. Operations Management Research, 9, 1–10.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hsieh, P. N., & Chang, P. L. (2009). An assessment of world-wide research productivity in production and operations management. International Journal of Production Economics, 120, 540–551.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hyytinen, A., Pajarinen, M., & Rouvinen, P. (2015). Does innovativeness reduce startup survival rates? Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4), 564–581.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ireland, R. D., & Webb, J. W. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating competitive advantage through streams of innovation. Business Horizons, 50(1), 49–59.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kanter, R. M. (2001). Evolve! Succeeding in the digital culture of tomorrow. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Khan, G. F., & Wood, J. (2015). Information technology management domain: emerging themes and keyword analysis. Scientometrics, 105(2), 959–972.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kimberly, J. R., & Evanisko, M. J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. The Academy of Management Journal, 24(3), 689–713.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 352, 124–141.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Landström, H., Harirchi, G., & Aström, F. (2012). Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41, 1154–1181.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Länsisalmi, H., Kivimäki, M., Aalto, P., & Ruoranen, R. (2006). Innovation in healthcare: A systematic review of recent research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 19(1), 66–72.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Laudano, M. C., Marzi, G., & Caputo, A. (2017). A decade of the international journal of entrepreneurship and small business: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business (Forthcoming).

• Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18–23.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Leydesdorff, L., Carley, S., & Rafols, I. (2013). Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories. Scientometrics, 94(2), 589–593.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lin, R. J., Tan, K. H., & Geng, Y. (2013). Market demand, green product innovation, and firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam motorcycle industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 101–107.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Maietta, O. W. (2015). Determinants of university–firm R&D collaboration and its impact on innovation: A perspective from a low-tech industry. Research Policy, 44(7), 1341–1359.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247–264.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Marzi, G., Caputo, A. & Dabic M. (2017a). Management lessons from Italy: A bibliometric analysis of top Italian based scholars and studies published from 1985 to 2015. International Journal of Critical Accounting (Forthcoming).

• Marzi, G., Rialti, R., Marina, D., & Caputo, A. (2017b). A mixed methods bibliometric investigation of the World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development: From qualitative to quantitative data. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development (Forthcoming).

• Nieto, M. J., & Santamaría, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27(6), 367–377.

• Nieto, M. J., Santamaría, L., & Fernandez, Z. (2015). Understanding the innovation behavior of family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(2), 382–399.

• Nord, W. R., & Tucker, S. (1987). Implementing routine and radical innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

  Google Scholar 

• OECD. (1997). The measurement of scientific and technological activities, proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441–453.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Peres, R., Muller, E., & Mahajan, V. (2010). Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: A critical review and research directions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(2), 91–106.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Piening, E. P., & Salge, T. O. (2015). Understanding the antecedents, contingencies, and performance implications of process innovation: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 80–97.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5(3–4), 137–168.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., & Bachrach, D. G. (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. Journal of Management, 34, 641–720.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reichstein, T., & Salter, A. (2006). Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(4), 653–682.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Roos, G. (2015). Servitization as Innovation in Manufacturing—A Review of the Literature, In The handbook of service innovation (pp. 403–435). Springer: London. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4471-6590-3_19

• Schroeder, R. G., Scudder, G. D., & Elm, D. R. (1989). Innovation in manufacturing. Journal of Operations Management, 8(1), 1–15.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schumpeter, J. (Ed.) (1950). The process of creative destruction. In Capitalism, socialism and democracy (3rd ed.). London: Allen and Unwin.

• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). Theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Shepherd, C., & Ahmed, P. K. (2000). From product innovation to solutions innovation: A new paradigm for competitive advantage. European Journal of Innovation Management, 3(2), 100–106.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Smith, A. (1986). (First published in 1776.) The wealth of nations, books I-III. London: Penguin Books.

• Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for man-aging innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Su, H. N., & Lee, P. C. (2010). Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: A first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight. Scientometrics, 85(1), 65–79.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Terziovski, M. (2010). Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 31(8), 892–902.

  Google Scholar 

• Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639–656.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Veugelers, R., & Cassiman, B. (1999). Make and buy in innovation strategies: Evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 28(1), 63–80.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Visnjic, I., Wiengarten, F., & Neely, A. (2016). Only the brave: Product innovation, service business model innovation, and their impact on performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(1), 36–52.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wellman, B., & Berkowitz, S. D. (1988). Social structures: A network approach (Vol. 2). Cambridge: CUP Archive.

  Google Scholar 

• Wu, D., Rosen, D. W., Wang, L., & Schaefer, D. (2015). Cloud-based design and manufacturing: A new paradigm in digital manufacturing and design innovation. Computer-Aided Design, 59, 1–14.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yoon, B., Lee, S., & Lee, G. (2010). Development and application of a keyword-based knowledge map for effective R&D planning. Scientometrics, 85(3), 803–820.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zhang, J., Yu, Q., Zheng, F., Long, C., Lu, Z., & Duan, Z. (2015a). Comparing keywords plus of WOS and author keywords: A case study of patient adherence research. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4), 967–972.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zhang, W., Zhang, Q., Yu, B., & Zhao, L. (2015b). Knowledge map of creativity research based on keywords network and co-word analysis, 1992–2011. Quality and Quantity, 49(3), 1023–1038.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zhao, R., & Chen, B. (2014). Applying author co-citation analysis to user interaction analysis: A case study on instant messaging groups. Scientometrics, 101(2), 985–997.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zhu, L., Liu, X., He, S., Shi, J., & Pang, M. (2015). Keywords co-occurrence mapping knowledge domain research base on the theory of big data in oil and gas industry. Scientometrics, 105(1), 249–260.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zollo, L., Marzi, G., Boccardi, A., & Ciappei, C. (2016). Gli effetti della Stampa 3D sulla competitività aziendale. Il caso delle imprese orafe del distretto di Arezzo. Piccola Impresa/Small Business, 2(2), 80–100.

• Zollo, L., Marzi, G., Boccardi, A., & Surchi, M. (2015). How to match technological and social innovation: Insights from the biomedical 3D printing industry. International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems, 4(1–2), 80–95.

Download references