[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Building a better ice scraper—a case in product platforms for the entrepreneur

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many entrepreneurs identify previously ignored consumer needs as an exciting opportunity for new product development. However, it is likely that very few recognize an opportunity for a platform-based approach to new product development to satisfy these needs. When partners Marion and Weinberger embarked on a morning flight out of Philadelphia, they discussed their frustration with cleaning the ice from their windshields. They discussed the problems with current ice scrapers, and by the time they landed in San Francisco, they had developed design criteria and preliminary sketches for an innovative ice scraper. Thus began their quest for building a better ice scraper and using a product platform strategy to target multiple market segments. This case study describes how the team identified market segments and price points along with the development of the principle blade platform and secondary handle platforms, its testing, manufacturing, and production. It also describes how they deliberately designed “hardpoints” for future customization to include as yet unconceived features that might be ascertained from customer feedback after product launch. Included is a description of the partnerships formed to build a virtual company that maximized resources and capabilities yet led to challenges in communication and documentation throughout the platform and product development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aboulafia R. (2000). Airbus pulls closer to Boeing. Aerospace America 38(4): 16–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin C.Y., Clark K.B. (2000). Design rules: Volume 1: The power of modularity. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Berti S., Germani M., Mandorli F., Otto H.E. (2001). Design of product families – An example within a small and medium-sized enterprise 13th International Conference on Engineer Design (pp. 507–514). Glasgow, UK.

  • Farrell R.S., Simpson T.W. (2003). Product platform design to improve commonality in custom products. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 14, 541–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feitzinger E., Lee H.L. (1997). Mass customization at Hewlett-Packard: The power of postponement. Harvard Business Review 75(1): 116–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly W. (1999). Back to the future. Automotive Engineer 24(5): 62–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehnerd A.P. (1997). Revitalizing the manufacture and design of mature global products. In: Guile B.R., Brooks H. (eds), Technology and global industry: Companies and nations in the world economy. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press, pp. 49–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Maupin, A. J., & Stauffer, L. A. (2000). A design tool to help small manufacturers reengineer a product family. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Baltimore, Maryland, September 10–13, DETC2000/DTM-14568.

  • Meyer M.H., Lehnerd A.P. (1997). The power of product platforms: Building value and cost leadership. New York, Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Muffato M. (1999). Introducing a platform strategy in product development. International Journal of Production Economics 60–61: 145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton K., Thornton E., Kerwin K., Dawley, H. (1997). Can Honda build a world car? Business Week, Sept. 8, 100(7).

  • Pine J.B.H. (1993). Standard modules allow mass customization at bally engineering structures. Planning Review 21(4): 20–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell R., Gardiner P. (1990). Design commonality to reduce multi-item inventory: Optimal depth of a product line. Operations Research 19(2): 491–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabbagh K. (1996). Twenty-First century jet: The making and marketing of the Boeing 777. New York, Scribner

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson S.W., Uzermeri M. (1997). Managing Product Families. Irwin, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson T.W. (2004). Product platform design and customization: Status and promise. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 18(1): 3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney (1993). Nippondenso Co. Ltd: A case study of strategic product design. Research in Engineering Design 5(1): 1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm (1997). Platform and modular concepts at Volkswagen – Their effect on the assembly process. In: Shimokawa K., Jurgens U., Fujimoto T. (eds), Transforming automobile assembly: Experience in automation and work organization. New York, Springer, pp. 145–156

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven B. Shooter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shooter, S.B., Evans, C.M. & Simpson, T.W. Building a better ice scraper—a case in product platforms for the entrepreneur. J Intell Manuf 18, 159–170 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-007-0010-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-007-0010-3

Keywords

Navigation