Abstract
Accurately predicting river flows over daily timescales is considered as an important task for sustainable management of freshwater ecosystems, agricultural applications, and water resources management. In this research paper, artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, namely the cascade correlation neural networks (CCNN) and the random forest (RF) models, were employed in daily river stage and river flow prediction for two river systems (i.e., Dulhunty River and Herbert River) in Australia. To develop the CCNN and RF models, a significant 3-day antecedent river stage and river flow time series were used. 80% of the whole data were used for model training and the remaining 20% for model testing. A total of ten different model structures with different input combinations were used to evaluate the optimal model in the training phase, and the results were analyzed using statistical metrics including the root mean square error (RMSE), Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient (NS), Willmott’s index of agreement (WI), and Legate and McCabe’s index (ELM) in the testing phase. The inter-comparison of CCNN and RF models for both river systems showed that the CCNN model was able to generate a more accurate prediction of the river stage and river flow compared to the RF model. Due to hydro-geographic differences leading to a different underlying historical data characteristics, the optimal CCNN’s performance for the Dulhunty River was found to be most accurate, in terms of ELM = 0.779, WI = 0.964, and ENS = 0.862 versus 0.775, 0.968, and 0.885 for the Herbert River. Following the performance accuracies, the authors ascertained that the CCNN model can be taken as a preferred data intelligent tool for river stage and river flow prediction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Aggarwal SK, Goel A, Singh VP (2012) Stage and discharge forecasting by SVM and ANN techniques. Water Resour Manag 26:3705–3724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0098-x
Ajmera TK, Goyal MK (2012) Development of stage-discharge rating curve using model tree and neural networks: an application to Peachtree Creek in Atlanta. Expert Syst Appl 39:5702–5710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.11.101
Alok A, Patra KC, Das SK (2013) Prediction of discharge with Elman and cascade neural networks. Res J Recent Sci India 2:279–284
Alvisi S, Mascellani G, Franchini M, Bardossy A (2006) Water level forecasting through fuzzy logic and artificial neural network approaches. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10:1–17
Baiamonte G, Ferro V (2007) Simple flume for flow measurement in sloping open channel. J Irrig Drain Eng 133:71–78. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2007)133:1(71)
Bhattacharya B, Solomatine DP (2005) Neural networks and M5 model trees in modeling water level-discharge relationship. Neurocomputing 63:381–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2004.04.016
Ch S, Anand N, Panigrahi BK, Mathur S (2013) Streamflow forecasting by SVM with quantum behaved particle swarm optimization. Neurocomputing 101:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2012.07.017
Chen SH, Lin YH, Chang LC, Chang FJ (2006) The strategy of building a flood forecast model by neuro-fuzzy network. Hydrol Process 20:1525–1540. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5942
Clemmens AJ, Wahlin BT (2006) Accuracy of annual volume from current-meter-based stage discharges. J Hydrol Eng 11:489–501. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:5(489)
Deka P, Chandramouli V (2003) A fuzzy neural network model for deriving the river stage—discharge relationship. Hydrol Sci J 48:197–209. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.48.2.197.44697
Deng W, Zhao H, Yang X, Xiong J, Sun M, Li B (2017a) Study on an improved adaptive PSO algorithm for solving multi-objective gate assignment. Appl Soft Comput 59:288–302
Deng W, Zhao H, Zou L, Li G, Yang X, Wu D (2017b) A novel collaborative optimization algorithm in solving complex optimization problems. Soft Comput 21(15):4387–4398
Deng W, Zhang S, Zhao H, Yang X (2018) A novel fault diagnosis method based on integrating empirical wavelet transform and fuzzy entropy for motor bearing. IEEE Access 6(1):35042–35056
Deng W, Xu J, Zhao H (2019a) An improved ant colony optimization algorithm based on hybrid strategies for scheduling problem. IEEE Access 7:20281–20292
Deng W, Yao R, Zhao H, Yang X, Li G (2019b) A novel intelligent diagnosis method using optimal LS-SVM with improved PSO algorithm. Soft Comput 23(7):2445–2462
Diamantopoulou MJ, Georgiou PE, Papamichail DM (2007) Performance of neural network models with Kalman learning rule for flow routing in a river system. Fresenius Environ Bull 16:1474
Fahlman SE, Lebiere C (1990) The cascade-correlation learning architecture. In: Touretzky DS (ed) Advances in neural information processing systems 2. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco
Firat M (2008) Comparison of artificial intelligence techniques for river flow forecasting. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 12:123–139. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-123-2008
Ghimire BN, Reddy MJ (2010) Development of stage-discharge rating curve in river using genetic algorithm and model tree. In: International workshop advanced in statistical hydrology, Italy
Ghorbani MA, Khatibi R, Goel A et al (2016a) Modeling river discharge time series using support vector machine and artificial neural networks. Environ Earth Sci 75:685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5435-6
Ghorbani MA, Zadeh HA, Isazadeh M, Terzi O (2016b) A comparative study of artificial neural network (MLP, RBF) and support vector machine models for river flow prediction. Environ Earth Sci 75:476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5096-x
Gleckler PJ, Taylor KE, Doutriaux C (2008) Performance metrics for climate models. J Geophys Res Atmos. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008972
Gocić M, Motamedi S, Shamshirband S et al (2015) Soft computing approaches for forecasting reference evapotranspiration. Comput Electron Agric 113:164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.02.010
Goel A, Pal M (2012) Stage-discharge modeling using support vector machines. Int J Eng 25:1–9. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ije.2012.25.01a.01
Habib EH, Meselhe EA (2006) Stage-discharge relations for low-gradient tidal streams using data-driven models. J Hydraul Eng 132:482–492. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2006)132:5(482)
Hasanpour Kashani M, Daneshfaraz R, Ghorbani MA et al (2015) Comparison of different methods for developing a stage-discharge curve of the Kizilirmak River. J Flood Risk Manag 8:71–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12064
Hengl T, Heuvelink GBM, Kempen B et al (2015) Mapping soil properties of Africa at 250 m resolution: random forests significantly improve current predictions. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125814
Jain SK, Chalisgaonkar D (2000) setting up stage-discharge relations using ANN. J Hydrol Eng 5:428–433. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:4(428)
Karunanithi N, Grenney WJ, Whitley D, Bovee K (1994) Neural networks for river flow prediction. J Comput Civ Eng 8:201–220. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1994)8:2(201)
Kashani MH, Soltangheys R (2018) Comparison of three intelligent techniques for runoff simulation. Civil Eng J 4(5):1095–1103
Khatibi R, Ghorbani MA, Kashani MH, Kisi O (2011) Comparison of three artificial intelligence techniques for discharge routing. J Hydrol 403(3–4):201–212
Khatibi R, Sivakumar B, Ghorbani MA et al (2012) Investigating chaos in river stage and discharge time series. J Hydrol 414–415:108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.026
Khatibi R, Ghorbani MA, Pourhosseini FA (2017) Streamflow predictions using nature-inspired firefly algorithms and a multiple model strategy—directions of innovation towards next-generation practices. Adv Eng Inform 34:80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AEI.2017.10.002
Kim S, Shiri J, Kisi O (2012) Pan evaporation modeling using neural computing approach for different climatic zones. Water Resour Manag 26:3231–3249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0069-2
Kim S, Singh VP, Seo Y (2014) Evaluation of pan evaporation modeling with two different neural networks and weather station data. Theor Appl Climatol 117:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-013-0985-y
Kişi Ö (2007) Streamflow forecasting using different artificial neural network algorithms. J Hydrol Eng 12:532–539. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:5(532)
Kumar M, Raghuwanshi NS, Singh R et al (2002) Estimating evapotranspiration using artificial neural network. J Irrig Drain Eng 128:224–233
Legates DR, Davis RE (1997) The continuing search for an anthropogenic climate change signal: limitations of correlation-based approaches. Geophys Res Lett 24:2319–2322. https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL02207
Legates DR, McCabe GJ (1999) Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour Res 35:233–241. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900018
Legates DR, McCabe GJ (2013) A refined index of model performance: a rejoinder. Int J Climatol 33:1053–1056. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3487
Liu WC, Chung CE (2014) Enhancing the predicting accuracy of the water stage using a physical-based model and an artificial neural network-genetic algorithm in a river system. Water (Switzerland) 6:1642–1661. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6061642
Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) river flow forecasting through conceptual models part 1—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
Nayak PC, Sudheer KP, Rangan DM, Ramasastri KS (2004) A neuro-fuzzy computing technique for modeling hydrological time series. J Hydrol 291:52–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.010
Nguyen T-T, Huu QN, Li MJ (2015) Forecasting time series water levels on Mekong river using machine learning models. In: 2015 Seventh international conference on knowledge and systems engineering (KSE). IEEE, pp 292–297
Prasad R, Deo RC, Li Y, Maraseni T (2017) Input selection and performance optimization of ANN-based streamflow forecasts in the drought-prone Murray Darling Basin region using IIS and MODWT algorithm. Atmos Res 197:42–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.06.014
Rodriguez-Galiano VF, Atkinson PM (2016) Modelling interannual variation in the spring and autumn land surface phenology of the European forest. Biogeosciences 13:3305
Seo Y, Kim S, Kisi O, Singh VP (2015) Daily water level forecasting using wavelet decomposition and artificial intelligence techniques. J Hydrol 520:224–243
Shoaib M, Shamseldin AY, Melville BW, Khan MM (2015) Runoff forecasting using hybrid wavelet gene expression programming (WGEP) approach. J Hydrol 527:326–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.072
Shortridge JE, Guikema SD, Zaitchik BF (2016) Machine learning methods for empirical streamflow simulation: a comparison of model accuracy, interpretability, and uncertainty in seasonal watersheds. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20:2611
Sivapragasam C, Muttil N (2005) Discharge rating curve extension—a new approach. Water Resour Manag 19:505–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-005-6811-2
Sudheer KP, Jain SK (2003) Radial basis function neural network for modeling rating curves. J Hydrol Eng 8:161–164. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:3(161)
Taormina R, Chau KW (2014) Neural network river forecasting with multi-objective fully informed particle swarm optimization. J Hydroinform 17:99–113. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2014.116
Taormina R, Chau KW, Sivakumar B (2015) Neural network river forecasting through baseflow separation and binary-coded swarm optimization. J Hydrol 529:1788–1797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.008
Tawfik M, Ibrahim A, Fahmy H (1997) Hysteresis sensitive neural network for modeling rating curves. J Comput Civ Eng 11:206–211. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1997)11:3(206)
Taylor KE (2001) Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. J Geophys Res Atmos 106:7183–7192. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900719
Thirumalaiah K, Deo MC (1998) River stage forecasting using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol Eng 3:26–32. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1998)3:1(26)
Were K, Bui DT, Dick OB, Singh BR (2015) A comparative assessment of support vector regression, artificial neural networks, and random forests for predicting and mapping soil organic carbon stocks across an Afromontane landscape. Ecol Indic 52:394–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.028
Willmott CJ, Matsuura K (2005) Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Clim Res 30:79–82. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr030079
Willmott CJ, Robeson SM, Matsuura K (2012) A refined index of model performance. Int J Climatol 32:2088–2094. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2419
Wu JS, Han J, Annambhotla S, Bryant S (2005) Artificial neural networks for forecasting watershed runoff and stream flows. J Hydrol Eng 10:216–222. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:3(216)
Zhang Z, Zhang Q, Singh VP, Shi P (2018) River flow modeling: comparison of performance and evaluation of uncertainty using data-driven models and conceptual hydrological model. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 32:2667–2682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-1536-y
Zhao TTG, Yang DW, Cai XM (2012) Predict seasonal low flows in the upper Yangtze River using random forests model. J Hydroelectr Eng 31:18–24
Zhao H, Sun M, Deng W, Yang X (2017) A new feature extraction method based on EEMD and multi-scale fuzzy entropy for motor bearing. Entropy 19(1):14
Zounemat-Kermani M, Seo Y, Kim S, Ghorbani MA, Samadianfard S, Naghshara S, Kim NW, Singh VP (2019) Can the decomposition approaches always enhance the soft computing models? Predicting the dissolved oxygen concentration in St. Johns River, Florida. Appl Sci 9(12):2534
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Communicated by V. Loia.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ghorbani, M.A., Deo, R.C., Kim, S. et al. Development and evaluation of the cascade correlation neural network and the random forest models for river stage and river flow prediction in Australia. Soft Comput 24, 12079–12090 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04648-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04648-2