[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Players indifferent to cooperate and characterizations of the Shapley value

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematical Methods of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we provide new axiomatizations of the Shapley value for TU-games using axioms that are based on relational aspects in the interactions among players. Some of these relational aspects, in particular the economic or social interest of each player in cooperating with each other, can be found embedded in the characteristic function. We define a particular relation among the players that it is based on mutual indifference. The first new axiom expresses that the payoffs of two players who are not indifferent to each other are affected in the same way if they become enemies and do not cooperate with each other anymore. The second new axiom expresses that the payoff of a player is not affected if players to whom it is indifferent leave the game. We show that the Shapley value is characterized by these two axioms together with the well-known efficiency axiom. Further, we show that another axiomatization of the Shapley value is obtained if we replace the second axiom and efficiency by the axiom which applies the efficiency condition to every class of indifferent players. Finally, we extend the previous results to the case of weighted Shapley values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albizuri MJ (2010) Games with externalities: games in coalition configuration function form. Math Meth Oper Res 72: 171–186

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Algaba E, Bilbao JM, van den Brink R, Jimenez-Losada A (2003) Axiomatizations of the Shapley value for cooperative games on antimatroids. Math Meth Oper Res 57: 49–65

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Casajus A (2011) Differential marginality, van den Brink fairness, and the Shapley value. Theory Decis 71(2): 163–174

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chun Y (1989) A new axiomatization of the Shapley value. Games Econ Behav 1: 119–130

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey P (1975) On the uniqueness of the Shapley value. Int J Game Theory 4: 131–139

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grabish M, Lange F (2007) Games on lattice, multichoice games and the Shapley value. Math Meth Oper Res 65: 156–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamiache G (2001) Associated consistency and Shapley value. Int J Game Theory 30: 279–289

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi JC (1959) A bargaining model for cooperative n-person games. In: Tucker AW, Luce RD (eds) Contributions to the theory of games IV. Princeton UP, Princeton, pp 325–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart S, Mas-Colell A (1989) Potencial, value and consistency. Econometrica 57: 589–614

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kalai E, Samet D (1987) On Weighted Shapley Values. Int J Game Theory 16: 205–222

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Khmelnitskaya A, Yanovskaya B (2007) Owen coalitional value without additivity axiom. Math Meth Oper Res 66: 255–261

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kongo T, Funaki Y, Tijs S (2007) New axiomatization and an implementation of the Shapley value. CentER, discussion paper 2007-90

  • Moretti S, Patrone F (2008) Transversality of the Shapley value. Top 16: 1–41

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson RB (1977) Graphs and cooperation in games. Math Oper Res 2: 225–229

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson RB (1980) Conference structures and fair allocation rules. Int J Game Theory 9: 169–182

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Neyman A (1989) Uniqueness of the Shapley value. Games Econ Behav 1: 116–118

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Owen G (1972) Multilinear extensions of games. Manag Sci 18(5): 64–79

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley LS (1953a) A value for n-person games. In: Roth AE (ed) The Shapley value. Cambridge UP, pp 41–48

  • Shapley LS (1953b) Additive and non-additive set functions. Dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton

  • van den Brink R (2001) An axiomatization of the Shapley value using a fairness property. Int J Game Theory 30: 309–319

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Winter E (2002) The Shapley value. In: Aumann RJ, Hart S (eds) Handbook of game theory, vol III, Chap 53. North-Holland, New York, pp 2025–2054

  • Young HP (1985) Monotonic solutions of cooperative games. Int J Game Theory 14: 65–72

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Young HP (1994) Cost allocation. In: Aumann RJ, Hart S (eds) Handbook of game theory, vol II, Chap 34. North-Holland, New York, pp 1193–1235

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Manuel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manuel, C., González-Arangüena, E. & van den Brink, R. Players indifferent to cooperate and characterizations of the Shapley value. Math Meth Oper Res 77, 1–14 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-012-0412-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-012-0412-7

Keywords

Mathematical Subject Classification (1991)

Navigation