What drives bio-art in the twenty-first century? Sources of innovations and cultural implications in bio-art/biodesign and biotechnology

• Andreasen NC (2014) Secrets of the creative brain. The Atlantic Magazine, July/August. Retrieved from: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/07/secrets-of-the-creative-brain/372299/. Accessed 11 Jan 2020

• Anker S (2014) The beginnings and the ends of bio-art. Artlink 34(3):16–17

  Google Scholar 

• Balmer A, Martin P (2008) Synthetic biology: social and ethical challenges. Institute for science and society. University of Nottingham, Nottingham

  Google Scholar 

• Barrat J (2013) Our final invention: artificial intelligence and the end of the human era. Thomas Dunne Books/St Martin’s Press, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Benitez M, Vogl M (2020) Digitally fabricated aesthetic enhancements and enrichments. AI Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00938-8

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Botar OAI, Wünsche I (eds) (2011) Biocentrism and Modernism. Ashgate Publishing, Surrey, p 266

  Google Scholar 

• Bureaud A, Malina RF, Whitely L (eds) (2014) Meta-life: biotechnologies, synthetic biology, a-life and the arts. Leonardo/ISAST and MIT Press, Rome

  Google Scholar 

• Butler D (2016) A world where everyone has a robot: why 2040 could blow your mind. Nature 530:398–401. https://doi.org/10.1038/530398a

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cameron DE, Bashor CJ, Collins JJ (2014) A brief history of synthetic biology. Nat Rev Microbiol 12(5):381–390. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3239

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Catts O, Zurr I (2006) The tissue culture and art project: the semi-living as agents of irony. In: Broadhurst S, Machon J (eds) Performance and technology: practices of virtual embodiment and interactivity. Palgrave Macmillan, UK

  Google Scholar 

• Coen E (2012) Cells to civilizations: the principles of change that shape life. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Collet C (2020) Designing our future bio-materiality. AI Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00936-w

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Damasio A (2018) The strange order of things. Life, feelings and making of cultures. Pantheon Books, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, London

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Davies P (2006) When computers take over. Nature 440:421–422. https://doi.org/10.1038/440421a

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Deacon TW (2011) Incomplete nature. How mind emerged from matter. WW Norton & Company, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Einstein A (1934) On the method of theoretical physics. Philos Sci 1(2):163–169

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Einstein A (1987) Letters to Solovine, 1906–1955. Phylosophical Library, Inc, New York, ISBN 0-8022-2526-8

• Eisner E (2007) Art and Knowledge. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of the arts in qualitative research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 3–12

  Google Scholar 

• Fears R, ter Meulen V (2011) The potential of synthetic biology: a view from the European Academies Science Advisory Council. Nat Rev Microbiol 9:222. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2498-c1

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Flemming D, Cress U, Kimmig S, Brandt M, Kimmerle J (2018) Emotionalization in science communication: The impact of narratives and visual representations on knowledge gain and risk perception. Front Commun. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00003(article 3)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fuller RB (1969) Operating manual for spaceship earth. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale

  Google Scholar 

• Funk C, Rainie L (2015) Public and scientists’ views on science and society. Pew Research Center. Sci Soc. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/. Accessed 11 Jan 2020

• Gregersen E (2019) History of technology timeline. Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved from: https://www.britannica.com/story/history-of-technology-timeline. Accessed 11 Jan 2020

• Jones CA (2019a) Questioning the cranial paradigm. Edge: Conversation: Life. Retrieved from: https://www.edge.org/conversation/caroline_a_jones-questioning-the-cranial-paradigm. Accessed 11 Jan 2020

• Jones CA (2019b) In Praise of Wetware: Humans must truly understand intelligence to re-create it. Ethics, Computing and AI, Perspectives from MIT. Retrieved from: https://shass.mit.edu/news/news-2019-ethics-and-ai-praise-wetware-caroline-jones. Accessed 11 Jan 2020

• Kac E (ed) (2007) Signs of life: bio art and beyond. MIT Press, Cambridge

  Google Scholar 

• Kac E (2020) Bio Art. AI Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00958-4

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kellert SR, Wilson EO (eds) (1993) The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, Washington

  Google Scholar 

• Kelly SD (2019) A philosopher argues that an AI can’t be an artist. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612913/a-philosopher-argues-that-an-ai-can-never-be-an-artist/

• Kurtzweil R (2005) The singularity is near: when humans transcend biology. Viking, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Kurzweil Interviews Minsky (2014) Is the singularity near? Retrieved from https://www.singularityweblog.com/kurzweil-interviews-minsky/. Accessed 11 Jan 2020

• Leake CD (1943) Science and the concept of freedom: a tribute to Galileo. Sci Mon 57(3):206–209

  Google Scholar 

• Lee SM, Trimi S (2018) Innovation for creating a smart future. J Innov Knowl 3:1–8

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Malevich K (1915) From cubism and futurism to suprematism. New painterly realism. In: Bowlt JE (ed) Russian art of the avant-garde: theory and criticism, 1902–1934. The Viking Press, New York, pp 116–135

  Google Scholar 

• Marcus G (2004) The birth of the mind: How a tiny number of genes creates the complexities of human thought. Basic Books, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Marieb EN, Hoehn K (2010) Human anatomy & physiology, 8th edn. Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco

  Google Scholar 

• Markowsky G (2017) Information theory: physiology. Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved from: https://www.britannica.com/science/information-theory/Physiology. Accessed 11 Jan 2020

• McLuhan M (1964) Understanding media: the extensions of man. McGraw Hill, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Midgley M (1994) The end of anthropocentrism? In: Attfield R, Belsey A (eds) Philosophy and the natural environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  Google Scholar 

• Mihaleva G (2020) Bio matter in creative practises for fashion and design. AI Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00957-5

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Neuman WR (2016) The digital difference: media technology and the theory of communication effects. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

  Book  Google Scholar 

• O’Connor T, Wong HY (2015) Emergent properties. In Zalta EN (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/properties-emergent/. Accessed 11 Jan 2020

• Patel R (2018) The arts and sciences are avatars of human creativity…. Impact Network. Retrieved from http://www.impactnetwork.org/field-journal/2018/11/19/the-arts-and-sciences-are-avatars-of-human-creativity. Accessed 11 Jan 2020

• Polanyi M (1962) Personal knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd, London

  Google Scholar 

• Rennie J (2018) How complex wholes emerge from simple parts. Retrieved from: https://www.quantamagazine.org/emergence-how-complex-wholes-emerge-from-simple-parts-20181220/. Accessed 11 Jan 2020

• Risko EF, Gilbert SJ (2016) Cognitive offloading. Trends Cogn Sci 20(9):676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Robinson R (2015) 3 human qualities digital technology can’t replace in the future economy: experience, values and judgement. The Urban technologist. Retrieved from: https://theurbantechnologist.com/2015/04/12/3-human-qualities-digital-technology-cant-replace-in-the-future-economy-experience-values-and-judgement/. Accessed 11 Jan 2020

• Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472apmid:19779433

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rodriguez Fernandez C (2017) How does it feel like to be a slime mold in Berlin? Retrieved from: https://www.labiotech.eu/bioart/heather-barnett-slime-mold/. Accessed 11 Jan 2020

• Rubenstein M, Sathikh P (2020) Eden in Iraq: a wastewater design project as bio art: a confluence of nature and culture, design and ecology, in Southern Iraq Marshes. AI Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00967-3

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, de Vries W, de Wit CA, Folke C, Gerten D, Heinke J, Mace GM, Persson LM, Ramanathan V, Reyers B, Sörlin S (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347(6223):1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stracey F (2009) Bio-art: the ethics behind the aesthetics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:496–500

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Supporting the synthetic revolution (2011) Editorial. Nat Rev Microbiol 9(1):2

  Article  Google Scholar 

• The Future of Jobs Report (2018) World Economic Forum, retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2018. Accessed 11 Jan 2020

• Todorovic V (2020) Reimagining life (Forms) with generative and bio art. AI Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00937-9

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Welcome to the Anthropocene (2019) Retrieved from http://www.anthropocene.info/index.php. Accessed 11 Jan 2020

• Wilson EO (1984) Biophilia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

  Google Scholar 

• Stellarc (2020) Retrieved from https://stelarc.org/projects.php. Accessed 11 Jan 2020

• The Human Connectome Project (2009) Retrieved from http://www.humanconnectomeproject.org. Accessed 11 Jan 2020

• Yetisen AK, Davis J, Coskun AF, Church GM, Yun SH (2015) Bioart. Trends Biotechnol 33(12):724–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.09.011

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zhu L, Kim S-J, Hara M, Aono M (2018) Remarkable problem-solving ability of unicellular amoeboid organism and its mechanism. R Soc Open Sci 5(12):180396. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180396

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references