[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of Grid and Tree Topologies in Agriculture WSN with RPL Routing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 236))

Abstract

Agricultural Internet of Things is very dependent on its Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) performance. The Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Network (RPL) is an IPv6-based routing protocol that was developed to provide more addresses and lower power for sensor nodes on WSN. This research compares the performance of grid and tree topologies with RPL routing protocol on Cooja simulator. The parameters evaluated in this study are power consumption, routing metrics, Expected Transmission Count (ETX), throughput, and delay. The result is the performance of the RPL routing protocol with the grid topology has better values than the tree topology in the various parameters tested. In throughput parameters, the grid topology values with 20, 30, and 42 nodes are 901 bps, 722 bps, and 678 bps, better than the tree topology which are 812 bps, 697 bps, and 531 bps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 159.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 199.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iova O, Picco P, Istomin T, Kiraly C (2016) Rpl: the routing standard for the internet of things... or is it?. IEEE Commun Mag 54(12):16–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2016.1600397CM

  2. Xie H, Zhang G, Su D, Wang P, Zeng F (2014) Performance evaluation of RPL routing protocol in 6lowpan. In: 2014 IEEE 5th international conference on software engineering and service science. IEEE, pp 625–628. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSESS.2014.6933646. (2014, June)

  3. Gao L, Zheng Z, Huo M (2018). Improvement of RPL protocol algo rithm for smart grid. In: 2018 IEEE 18th international conference on communica tion technology (ICCT). IEEE, pp 927–930. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCT.2018.8600162. (2018, October)

  4. Lassouaoui L, Rovedakis S, Sailhan F, Wei A (2016, October). Evaluation of energy aware routing metrics for RPL. In: 2016 IEEE 12th international conference on wireless and mobile computing, networking and communications (WiMob). IEEE, pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/WiMOB.2016.7763212. (2016, October).

  5. Hendrawan INR (2018) Analisis Kinerja Protokol Routing RPL pada Simulator Cooja. Jurnal Sistem dan Informatika (JSI) 12(2):9–18

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saputra AH, Trisnawan PH, Bakhtiar FA (2018) Analisis Kinerja Pro- tokol 6LoWPAN pada Jaringan Sensor Nirkabel dengan Topologi Jaringan Grid dan Topologi Jaringan Random Menggunakan Cooja Simulator. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer e-ISSN 2548:964X

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ullah R, Faheem Y, Kim BS (2017) Energy and congestion-aware routing metric for smart grid AMI networks in smart city. IEEE Access 5:13799–13810. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2728623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tran H, Vo MT, Mai L (2018) A comparative performance study of RPL with different topologies and MAC protocols. In: 2018 international conference on advanced technologies for communications (ATC). IEEE, pp. 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1109/ATC.2018.8587445. (2018, October)

  9. Gokilapriya V, Bhuvaneswari PTV (2017) Analysis of RPL routing protocol on topology control mechanism. In: 2017 fourth international conference on signal processing, communication and networking (ICSCN). IEEE, pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSCN.2017.8085693. (2017, March)

  10. Amalina EN, Setijadi E, Perbandingan Topologi WSN (Wireless Sensor Net-work) Untuk Sistem Pemantauan Jembatan.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hicham A, Sabri A, Jeghal A, Tairi H (2017) A comparative study between operating systems (Os) for the Internet of Things (IoT). Trans Mach Learn Artif Intell 5(4). https://doi.org/10.14738/tmlai.54.3192

  12. Ghaleb B, Al-Dubai AY, Ekonomou E, Alsarhan A, Nasser Y, Mackenzie LM, Boukerche A (2018) A survey of limitations and enhancements of the ipv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks: a focus on core operations. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 21(2):1607–1635. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2018

  13. Hassani AE, Sahel A, Badri A (2019) Assessment of a proactive routing protocol RPL in Ipv6 based wireless sensor networks. In: 2019 third inter-national conference on intelligent computing in data sciences (ICDS). IEEE, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDS47004.2019.8942364. (2019, October).

  14. Wang ZM, Li W, Dong HL (2018). Analysis of energy consumption and topology of routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks. J Phys Conf Ser 1087(5)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zikria YB, Afzal MK, Ishmanov F, Kim SW, Yu H (2018) A survey on routing protocols supported by the Contiki Internet of things operating system. Futur Gener Comput Syst 82:200–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.12.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim HS, Ko J, Culler DE, Paek J (2017) Challenging the IPv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks (RPL): a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 19(4):2502–2525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Banh M, Mac H, Nguyen N, Phung KH, Thanh NH, Steenhaut K (201) Performance evaluation of multiple RPL routing tree instances for Internet of Things applications. In: 2015 international conference on advanced technologies for communications (ATC). IEEE, pp 206–211. https://doi.org/10.1109/ATC.2015.7388321. (2015, October)

  18. Tian H, Qian Z, Wang X, Liang X (2017) QoI-aware DODAG construction in RPL-based event detection wireless sensor networks. J Sens. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1603713

  19. Kalyani S, Vydeki D (2018) Measurement and analysis of QoS parameters in RPL network. In 2018 Tenth International Conference on Advanced Computing (ICoAC). IEEE, pp. 307–312. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoAC44903.2018.8939052. (2018, December)

  20. Santos AL, Cervantes CA, Nogueira M, Kantarci B (2019) Clustering and reliability-driven mitigation of routing attacks in massive IoT systems. J Internet Serv Appl 10(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13174-019-0117-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rawat P, Singh KD, Chaouchi H, Bonnin JM (2014) Wireless sensor networks: a survey on recent developments and potential synergies. J Supercomput 68(1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-013-1021-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaur T, Kumar D (2020) A survey on QoS mechanisms in WSN for computational intelligence based routing protocols. Wireless Netw 26(4):2465–2486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-019-01978-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lokare VT, Thorat SA (2015) Cooperative Opportunistic Routing based on ETX metric to get better performance in MANET. In: 2015 international conference on computer communication and informatics (ICCCI). IEEE, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCI.2015.7218067. (2015, January)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Febrian Aji Pangestu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pangestu, F.A., Abdurohman, M., Putrada, A.G. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Grid and Tree Topologies in Agriculture WSN with RPL Routing. In: Yang, XS., Sherratt, S., Dey, N., Joshi, A. (eds) Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 236. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2380-6_40

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics