[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Let Citizens Speak Up: Designing Intelligent Online Participation for Urban Planning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design Science Research for a Resilient Future (DESRIST 2024)

Abstract

Urbanization and the transformation toward sustainability pose new challenges to governments, leading to an increase in citizen participation in urban planning. Due to the demand for scalability, urban participation is often conducted online. However, past projects showed that the asynchronous and impersonal exchange reduces the value of citizens’ submissions as inquiries are omitted. Thus, this study investigates how to design an IT artifact to support citizens in contributing to online participation in urban planning projects. To do so, we initiated a design science research project. We analyzed the literature to define issues, formulate meta-requirements, and derive design principles to develop and qualitatively evaluate an AI-based prototype that enables immediate responses to citizens considering their contributions. This study contributes to the field of information systems with prescriptive knowledge. Furthermore, this study can guide practitioners in citizen participation in urban planning in building and utilizing digital tools to support citizens in contributing to subsequent processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 89.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 64.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abel, P., Miether, D., Pl¨otzky, F., Robra-Bissantz, S.: The Shape of Bottom-Up Urbanism participatory Platforms: A Conceptualisation and empirical Study. BLED (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abel, P., Schlimbach, R., Glimmann, V., Schwarz, J., Simon, M., Robo-Bissantz, S.: Designing Urban Participation Platforms Model for Goal-oriented, Classification of Participation Mechanisms. In: 35th BLED eConference (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Akasaka, F., Nakatani, M.: Citizen involvement in service co-creation in urban living labs. In: Proceedings of the 54th HICSS (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alexopoulos, Ch., Keramidis, P., Viale Pereira, G., Charalabidis, Y.: Towards smart cities 4.0: digital participation in smart cities solutions and the use of disruptive technologies. In: Themistocleous, M., Papadaki, M. (eds.) EMCIS 2021. LNBIP, vol. 437, pp. 258–273. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95947-0_18

  5. Altafini, D., Mara, F., Cutini, V.: A data-driven approach for a city-university mobility plan: the case of the University of Pisa. In: ICCSA, pp. 401–417 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Amard, A., Hoess, A., Roth, T., Fridgen, G., Rieger, A.: Guiding refugees through european bureaucracy: designing a trustworthy mobile app for document management. In: Drechsler, A., Gerber, A., Hevner, A. (eds.) DESRIST 2022. LNCS, vol. 13229, pp. 171–182. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06516-3_13

  7. Arnstein, S.R.: A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Plann. 35(4), 216–224 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bachiller, S., Quijano-S´anchez, L., Cantador, I.: A flexible and lightweight interactive data mining tool to visualize and analyze digital citizen participation content. In: 36th Annual ACM SAC, pp. 413–416 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Becker, F., Siemon, D., Robra-Bissantz, S.: Smart participation design: prescriptive knowledge for bottom-up participation. CAIS 51(1) (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Birghan, F., Hettenhausen, R., Meschede, Ch.: Challenges, barriers, and approaches for providing digital citizen information. A case-study in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. In: 54th HICSS (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bjørgen, A., Fossheim, K., Macharis, C.: How to build stakeholder participation in collaborative urban freight planning. Cities 112 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Borchers, M., Tavanapour, N., Bittner, E.: Toward intelligent platforms to support citizen participation in urban planning. PACIS (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cai, M.: Natural language processing for urban research: a systematic review. Heliyon 7(3) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cantador, I., Bellogín, A., Cortés-Cediel, M.E., Gil, O.: Exploiting open data to analyze discussion and controversy in online citizen participation. IP&M (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cerreta, M., Liccardi, L., Reitano, M.: A citizen-led spatial information system for collaborative (post-)pandemic urban strategies: the ponticelli experience, naples. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2021. LNCS, vol. 12954, pp. 293–306. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86979-3_22

  16. Chiordi, S., Desogus, G., Garau, Ch., Nesi, P., Zamperlin, P.: A preliminary survey on smart specialization platforms: evaluation of european best practices. In: ICCSA, pp. 67–84 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cifolelli, S., Zirulo, A., Berardi, M.: Exploring the interceptions between smart cities and digitalization for urban development - a systematic literature review and future research agenda. ITAIS (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Coenen, J., Biedermann, P., Claes, S., Moere, A.V.: The stakeholder perspective on using public polling displays for civic engagement. C&T 61–74 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Correia, D., Feio, J.E., Marques, J., Teixeira, L.: Participatory methodology guidelines to promote citizens’ participation in decision-making: evidence based on a Portuguese case study. Cities 135, 104213 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sofia Dastoli, P., Pontrandolfi, P.: Methods and tools for a participatory local development strategy. In: Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L., Piñeira Mantiñán, M.J. (eds.) NMP 2022. LNNS, vol. 482, pp. 2112–2121. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06825-6_203

  21. Diop, E.B., Chenal, J., Tekouabou, S.C.K., Azmi, R.: Crowdsourcing public engagement for urban planning in the global south: methods, challenges and suggestions for future research. Sustainability 14(18), Article 18 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dominiković, I., Ćukušić, M., Jadrić, M.: The role of artificial intelligence in smart cities: systematic literature review. In: Bisset Álvarez, E. (eds.) DIONE 2021, pp. 64–80. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77417-2_5

  23. Graf-Drasch, V., Keller, R., Meindl, O., Röhrich, F.: The design of citizen-centric green is in sustainable smart districts. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 65(5), 521–538 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Flores, C.C., Rezende Alicides, D.: Crowdsourcing framework applied to strategic digital city projects. J. Urban Manag. 12 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fürstenau, D., Morelli, F., Meindl, K., Schulte-Althoff, M., Rabe, J.: A social citizen dashboard for participatory urban planning in berlin: prototype and evaluation. In: 54th HICSS (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Göritz, L., Stattkus, D., Beinke, J.H., Thomas, O.: To reduce bias, you must identify it first! Towards automated gender bias detection. In: ICIS (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gregor, S., Chandra Kruse, L., Seidel, S.: The anatomy of a design principle. JAIS 21, 1622–1652 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hölzer, S., Honner, L., Preßler, W., Schulz, A., Erfurth, Ch.: Towards designing a user-centered local community platform to foster social cohesion in a multi-generational smart community. In: I4CS 2023. CCIS, vol. 1876, pp. 277–291. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40852-6_15

  29. Huang, H., Xu, H., Wang, X., Silamu, W.: Maximum F1-score discriminative training criterion for automatic mispronunciation detection. TASLP 23(4), 787–797 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jiang, A., Zubiaga, A.: Cross-lingual capsule network for hate speech detection in social media. In: 32st ACM Conference HT, pp. 217–223 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Karadimitriou, N., Magnani, G., Timmerman, R., Marshall, S., Hudson-Smith, A.: Designing an incubator of public spaces platform: applying cybernetic principles to the co-creation of spaces. Land Use Policy 119, 106187 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Katmada, A., Komninos, N., Kakderi, Ch.: The landscape of digital platforms for bottom-up collaboration, creativity, and innovation creation. In: Streitz, N.A., Konomi, S. (eds.) HCII 2022, pp. 28–42. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05463-1_3

  33. Katzef, A., Gcora Vumazonke, N., Chigona, W., Tonateni Tuyeni, T., Queen Mtegha, Ch.: Factors affecting citizens’ use of e-participation platforms: a case of GovChat platform in cape town municipality. In: IFIP, vol. 657, pp. 69–88 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kitchenham, B.A.: Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews, vol. 33 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kuechler, B., Vaishnavi, V.: On theory development in design science research: anatomy of a research project. ECIS 17(5), 489–504 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kuechler, B., Vaishnavi, V.: A framework for theory development in design science research: multiple perspectives. JAIS 13(6) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Küstermann, G.C., Bittner, E.A.C.: Leveraging human and machine capabilities for analyzing citizen contributions in participatory urban planning and development: a design-oriented approach. In: Fui-Hoon Nah, F., Siau, K. (eds.) HCII 2022. LNCS, vol. 13327, pp. 56–72. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05544-7_5

  38. Kulunchakov, A., Mairal, J.: Estimate sequences for stochastic composite optimization: variance reduction, acceleration, and robustness to noise. JMLR (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Leible, S., Ludzay, M., Götz, S., Kaufmann, T., Meyer- Lüters, K., Tran, M.N.: ICT application types and equality of e-participation—a systematic literature review. PACIS (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lieven, C., Lüders, B., Kulus, D., Thoneick, R.: Enabling digital co-creation in urban planning and development. In: Zimmermann, A., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) Human Centred Intelligent Systems. SIST, vol. 189, pp. 415–430. Springer, Singapore (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5784-2_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Lin, Y.: Social media for collaborative planning: a typology of support functions and challenges. Cities 125, 103641 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lòopez-de-Ipina, D., et al.: A collaborative environment for co-delivering citizen science campaigns. In: UCAmI, pp. 322–333 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Maaroufi, M.M., Stour, L., Agoumi, A.: Contribution of digital collaboration and e-learning to the implementation of smart mobility in Morocco. In: Motahhir, S., Bossoufi, B. (eds.) ICDTA 2021. LNNS, vol. 211, pp. 609–619. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73882-2_55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Nicolas, C., Kim, J., Chi, S.: NLP-based characterization of top-down communication in smart cities for enhancing citizen alignment. SCS 66 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Pantić, M., et al.: Challenges and opportunities for public participation in urban and regional planning during the COVID-19 pandemic—lessons learned for the future. Land Article 12 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Dinh Phuoc, L., Giang Son, N.: E-planning and its potential development in Vietnam’s urban planning. In: CIGOS 2021, CIGOS (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Witt, A.S., da Silva, F.C.C.: Overview of citizen science projects contemplated in the civis platform. In: Pinto, A.L., Arencibia-Jorge, R. (eds.) DIONE 2022. LNICST, vol. 452, pp. 16–28. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22324-2_2

  48. Pristl, A.-C., Billert, M.: Citizen Participation in increasingly digitalized governmental Environments - A structured Literature Review. ECIS (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  49. López Reyes, M.E., Magnussen, R.: The use of open government data to create social value. In: Janssen, M., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2022. LNCS, vol. 13391, pp. 244–257. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15086-9_16

  50. Roman, M., Fellnhofer, K.: Facilitating the participation of civil society in regional planning: implementing quadruple helix model in Finnish regions. LUP 1–12 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Romberg, J., Escher, T.: Making sense of citizens’ input through artificial intelligence: a review of methods for computational text analysis to support the evaluation of contributions in public participation. DGOV (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Royo, S., Pina, V., Garcia-Rayado, J.: Decide madrid: a critical analysis of an award-winning e-participation initiative. Sustainability 12(4), Article 4 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sanabria-Z, J., Molina-Espinosa, J., Artemova, I., Alfaro-Ponce, B.: Mobile app prototype for citizen science: toward the development of complex thinking, perspectives and trends in education and technology. In: Mesquita, A., Abreu, A., Carvalho, J.V., Santana, C., de Mello, C.H.P. (eds.) ICITED 2023. SIST, vol. 366, pp. 657–666. Springer, Singapore (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5414-8_60

  54. Schrammeijer, E.A., van Zanten, B.T., Davis, J., Verburg, P.H.: The advantage of mobile technologies in crowdsourcing landscape preferences: testing a mobile app to inform planning decisions. Urban Forestry Urban Greening (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Secinaro, S., Brescia, V., Iannaci, D., Jonathan, G.M.: Does citizen involvement feed on digital platforms? IJPA 45(9), 708–725 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Stelzle, B., Jannack, A., Noennig, J.R.: Co-design and co-decision: decision making on collaborative design platforms. PCS 2435–2444 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Stelzle, B., Noennig, J.R.: A database for participation methods in urban development. PCS 2416–2425 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Stelzle, B., Noennig, J.R.: A method for the assessment of public participation in urban development. UDI (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Stelzle, B.: Influencing factors on citizen participation in urban development. In: 2019 IEEE 2nd UKRCON, pp. 1278–1281 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Svikhnushina, E., Pu, P.: Key qualities of conversational chatbots – the PEACE model. In: 26th IUI, pp. 520–530 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Tremblay, M., Hevner, A., Berndt, D., Chatterjee, S.: The use of focus groups in design science research. DR IS 22, 121–143 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  62. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World urbanization prospects: The 2018 revision (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Vagena, F., Sneiders, E.: Communication between citizens and public organizations as a means of public value co-creation. In: The 23rd DGS, pp. 1–12 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Velhinho, A., Almeida, P.: POLARISCOPE – a platform for the co-creation and visualization of collective memories. In: Marcus, A., Rosenzweig, E., Soares, M.M. (eds.) HCII 2023. LNCS, vol. 14031, pp. 273–285. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35696-4_20

  65. Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: FEDS: a framework for evaluation in design science research. EJIS 25(1), 77–89 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Verne, G., Steinstø, T., Simonsen, L., Bratteteig, T.: How can i help you? A chatbot’s answers to citizens’ information needs. SJIS 34(2) (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  67. de Vreede, T., de Vreede, G., Alawi, N.: Achieving success in community crowdsourcing lessons from the field. In: 54th HICSS (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Wiethof, C., Bittner, E.: Toward a hybrid intelligence system in customer service: collaborative learning of human and AI. ECIS (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Zambon, Z., Bassetti, Ch., Prandi, C.: A close look at citizen science through the HCI lens: a systematic literature review. INTERACT, pp. 414–435 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Živković, L.: Project e-space: building a digital platform for spatial and urban planning and development in Serbia. In: ICCSA, pp. 503–518 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marten Borchers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Borchers, M., Gierlich-Joas, M., Tavanapour, N., Bittner, E. (2024). Let Citizens Speak Up: Designing Intelligent Online Participation for Urban Planning. In: Mandviwalla, M., Söllner, M., Tuunanen, T. (eds) Design Science Research for a Resilient Future. DESRIST 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14621. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61175-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61175-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-61174-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-61175-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics