Abstract
One of today’s pressing problems is how to take environmentally responsible action within the transportation sector, especially when faced with difficult alternatives, that is, choices between alternatives which are by nature multicriterial. This leads to problems with objectives which resemble those of strategic games and to a lesser extend those of uncertainty-facing technical decisions. In the medium to long run, such choices also lead to binding consequences and sometimes to undesirable outcomes. By now public opinion – at least in developed economies – seems to prefer environmental intervention over inactivity. While there is overwhelming awareness and evidence of the environmental harm caused by our lifestyle in an industrialized and overpopulated world, there is much less consensus over what mitigating actions should be taken. In order to highlight both the difficulty and the risk associated which such action, we portrait the situation from a country (Romania) which does not enjoy much reassurance concerning the longer-term viability of implementing far-reaching environmental reforms: The lack of any noteworthy societal tradition in favor of determined environmental action combined with the absence of “patient” capital may undermine progress. Simultaneously, there is widespread hope of gaining a much higher living standard by more aggressive, quantitative economic growth. This situation may be typical for most emerging economies, that is, for the bigger part of the world population. We propose to represent the choice along two main dimensions, namely, (a) choice of vehicle propulsion type and (b) ownership structure of the means of transportation. The factors contributing to narrowing down the choices may be subdivided into (1) embodied technical advances and fleet age, (2) costs raised by different degrees of closing of resource cycles, (3) aspects of relieving traffic congestions and reducing delays, and (4) re-planning and re-purposing use of urban space. Possible follow-up effects and the chances of eventual implementation are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
This value was calculated based on the input data provided by JASPERS – Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects. Economic appraisal tool for Cohesion Policy 2014–2020. JASPERS (“Joint Assistance to Support Projects in European Regions”) is a technical assistance partnership between the European Commission, the European Investment Bank, and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Its purpose is to promote the efficient use of EU Structural Funds, thereby stimulating future investment (n.a.).
References
Arthur, B. W. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. The Free Press and Penguin Books.
Barthelmie, R. J., & Pryor, S. P. (2021). Climate change mitigation potential of wind energy. Climate, 9(136), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9090136
BBC. (2022). As the world looks to electrify vehicles and store renewable power, one giant challenge looms: What will happen to all the old lithium batteries? https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20220105-lithium-batteries-big-unanswered-question
Benhabib, J., Perla, J., & Tonetti, C. (2014). Catch-up and fall-back through innovation and imitation. Journal of Economic Growth, 19, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-013-9095-z
Bharadwaj, K. (1970). On the maximum number of switches between two production systems. Schweizerische Zeitschrift fuer Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, 106(4), 104–129.
Bray, S. R., & Wang, B. (2020). Forecasting unprecedented ecological fluctuations. PLOS Computational Biology, 16(6), e1008021.
Chen, Z., Wang, Y., Zhao, B., Cheng, Z., Zhao, X., & Duan, Z. S. (2020). Knowledge graph completion: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3030076
Desing, H., & Widmer, R. (2021). Reducing climate risks with fast and complete energy transitions: Applying the precautionary principle to the Paris agreement. Environmental Research Letters, 16(12), 121002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac36f9
Euro Case. (2014). Euro-CASE-policy-paper-ETS-reform.pdf
Euro Case. (2021). Euro-CASE engineering a resilient future (panel). https://www.euro-case.org
European Commission. (2020a). Group of Chief Scientific Advisors, Scoping paper: A systemic approach to the energy transition in Europe. https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/support-policy-making/scientific-support-eu-policies/group-chief-scientific-advisors/systemic-approach-energy-transition-europe_en
European Commission. (2020b). e Euro-CASE report energy transition in Europe: Common goals but different paths. https://www.euro-case.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Eurocase/Publications/PDF/platform_energie2019.pdf
IRENA. (2020). Global renewables outlook: Energy transformation 2050 (edition: 2020). International Renewable Energy Agency. ISBN 978-92-9260-238-3, www.irena.org/publications
Kaaronen, R. O., & Strelkovskii, N. (2020). Cultural evolution of sustainable behaviors: Pro-environmental tipping points in an agent-based model. One Earth, 2, 85–97. Elsevier Inc. Open access article https://www.cell.com/one-earth/fulltext/S2590-3322(20)30003-8
Knobloch, F., Hanssen, S., Lam, A., et al. (2020). Net emission reductions from electric cars and heat pumps in 59 world regions over time. Nature Sustainability, 3, 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0488-7
Kontar, W., Soyoung Ahn, S., & Andrea Hicks, A. (2021). Autonomous vehicle adoption: Use phase environmental implications. Environmental Research Letters, 16(6), 064010.
LifeCycleCO2. (2021). Life-cycle emissions of electricity options. http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/energy-and-the-environment/carbon-dioxide-emissions-from-electricity.aspx. Accessed Dec 2021.
Mousavian, M. H., Shakouri, H. G., Mashayekhi, A.-N., & Kazemi, A. (2020). Does the short-term boost of renewable energies guarantee their stable long-term growth? Assessment of the dynamics of feed-in tariff policy. Renewable Energy, 159, 1252–1268.
Nakamoto, Y., & Kagawa, S. (2022). A generalized framework for analyzing car lifetime effects on stock, flow, and carbon footprint. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26(2), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.1319
Nambhi, A. M., Reddy, B. P., Agarwal, A. P., Verma, G., Singh, H., & Burhanuddin, I. A. (2019). Stuck? No worries!: Task-aware command recommendation and proactive help for analysts. https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.08973v1 [cs.HC], pp. 1–5.
Pless, J., Hepburn, C., & Farrell, N. (2020). Bringing rigour to energy innovation policy evaluation. Nature Energy, 5, 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0557-1
REUTERS. (2021). https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/analysts-raise-eu-carbon-price-forecasts-gas-rally-drives-up-coal-power-2021-10-14/
Saheb, T., & Dehghani, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence for sustainability in energy industry: A contextual topic modeling and content analysis. arXiv:2110.00828v1 [cs.AI] for pp. 1–36.
Schebesch, K. B., & Șoim, H. (2020). Entrepreneurship, behavioral biases and ethics: Are they instrumental for overcoming crises? In 10th edition Griffiths School of Management and IT annual conference, accepted for publication.
Schmelz, K., & Bowles, S. (2021). Overcoming COVID-19 vaccination resistance when alternative policies affect the dynamics of conformism, social norms, and crowding out. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(25), e2104912118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2104912118
Yang, V. C., Galesic, M., McGuinness, H., & Harutyunyan, A. (2021). Dynamical system model predicts when social learners impair collective performance. PNAS, 118(35), e2106292118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2106292118
Yayun Zheng, Y., Yang, F., Duan, J., Sun, X., Fu, L., & Kurths, J. (2020). The maximum likelihood climate change for global warming under the influence of greenhouse effect and Lévy noise. Chaos, 30(1), 013132. https://doi:10.1063/1.5129003
Zhao, F., Chen, K., Hao, H., & Liu, Z. (2020). Challenges, potential and opportunities for internal combustion engines in China. Sustainability, 12(12), 4955. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124955
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schebesch, K.B., Șoim, H. (2022). Green Economy: Opportunities for Reshaping Personal Transportation? Between Tough Technological Choices and Induced Client Behavior. In: Fotea, S.L., Fotea, I.Ş., Văduva, S. (eds) Post-Pandemic Realities and Growth in Eastern Europe. GSMAC 2022. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09421-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09421-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09420-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09421-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)