[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

When Nominal Analogical Proportions Do Not Fail

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12322))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 422 Accesses

Abstract

Analogical proportions are statements of the form “\(\mathbf {a}\) is to \(\mathbf {b}\) as \(\mathbf {c}\) is to \(\mathbf {d}\)”, where \(\mathbf {a}\), \(\mathbf {b}\), \(\mathbf {c}\), \(\mathbf {d}\) are tuples of attribute values describing items. The mechanism of analogical inference, empirically proved to be efficient in classification and reasoning tasks, started to be better understood when the characterization of the class of classification functions with which the analogical inference always agrees was established for Boolean attributes. The purpose of this paper is to study the case of finite attribute domains that are not necessarily two-valued, i.e., when attributes are nominal. In particular, we describe the more stringent class of “hard” analogy preserving (HAP) functions \(f :X_1\,\times \,\dots \,\times \,X_m \rightarrow X\) over finite domains \(X_1, \dots , X_m, X\) for binary classification purposes. This description is obtained in two steps. First we observe that such AP functions are almost affine, that is, their restriction to any \(S_1 \times \dots \times S_m\), where \(S_i \subseteq X_i\) and \(|{S_i}| \le 2\) (\(1 \le i \le m\)), can be turned into an affine function by renaming variable and function values. We then use this result together with some universal algebraic tools to show that they are essentially unary or quasi-linear, which provides a general representation of HAP functions. As a by-product, in the case when \(X_1 = \dots = X_m = X\), it follows that this class of HAP functions constitutes a clone on X, thus generalizing several results by some of the authors in the Boolean case .

The authors acknowledge a partial support of ANR-11-LABX-0040-CIMI (Cent. Int. de Math. et d’Informat.) within program ANR-11-IDEX-0002-02, project ISIPA, and a partial support of Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology) through project UID/MAT/00297/2019 (Centro de Matemática e Aplicações) and project PTDC/MAT-PUR/31174/2017.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    An argument \(x_i\) is said to be inessential in \(f :\mathbf {X} \rightarrow X\) if for all \((a_1, \dots , a_m) \in \mathbf {X}\), \(a'_i \in X_i\), we have \(f(a_1, \dots , a_m) = f(a_1, \dots , a_{i-1}, a'_i, a_{i+1}, \dots , a_m)\). Otherwise, \(x_i\) is said to be essential in f. The number of essential arguments of f is called the essential arity of f.

  2. 2.

    Recall that the kernel of f is \(\mathop {\mathrm {ker}} f := \{(\mathbf {a},\mathbf {b}) \in \{0,1\}^m \times \{0,1\}^m \mid f(\mathbf {a}) = f(\mathbf {b})\}\).

References

  1. Barbot, N., Miclet, L., Prade, H., Richard, G.: A new perspective on analogical proportions. In: Kern-Isberner, G., Ognjanović, Z. (eds.) ECSQARU 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11726, pp. 163–174. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bounhas, M., Prade, H., Richard, G.: Analogy-based classifiers for nominal or numerical data. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 91, 36–55 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Burle, G.A.: Classes of \(k\)-valued logic which contain all functions of a single variable. Diskret. Analiz 10, 3–7 (1967). (Russian)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Couceiro, M., Hug, N., Prade, H., Richard, G.: Analogy-preserving functions: a way to extend Boolean samples. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2017, Melbourne, August 19–25, pp. 1575–1581 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Couceiro, M., Hug, N., Prade, H., Richard, G.: Behavior of analogical inference w.r.t. Boolean functions. In: Lang, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2018, Stockholm, July 13–19, pp. 2057–2063. ijcai.org (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crama, Y., Hammer, P.: Boolean Functions - Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 142. Cambridge University Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hesse, M.: On defining analogy. Proc. Aristotelian Soc. 60, 79–100 (1959)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Klein, S.: Analogy and mysticism and the structure of culture (and Comments and Reply). Curr. Anthropol. 24(2), 151–180 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Langlais, P., Patry, A.: Translating unknown words by analogical learning. In: Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) and Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CONLL), Prague, pp. 877–886 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lepage, Y.: Analogy and formal languages. In: Proceedings of the FG/MOL, pp. 373–378 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miclet, L., Bayoudh, S., Delhay, A.: Analogical dissimilarity: definition, algorithms and two experiments in machine learning. JAIR 32, 793–824 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Miclet, L., Prade, H.: Handling analogical proportions in classical logic and fuzzy logics settings. In: Sossai, C., Chemello, G. (eds.) ECSQARU 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5590, pp. 638–650. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02906-6_55

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Prade, H., Richard, G.: Analogical proportions: from equality to inequality. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 101, 234–254 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Salomaa, A.: On essential variables of functions, especially in the algebra of logic. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A I(339), 1–11 (1963)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Stone, M.H.: The theory of representation for Boolean algebras. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 40(1), 37–111 (1936)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Stroppa, N., Yvon, F.: Du quatrième de proportion comme principe inductif : une proposition et son application à l’apprentissage de la morphologie. Trait. Autom. Lang. 47(2), 1–27 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhegalkin, I.I.: On the technique of calculating propositions in symbolic logic. Mat. Sb. 43, 9–28 (1927)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henri Prade .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Couceiro, M., Lehtonen, E., Miclet, L., Prade, H., Richard, G. (2020). When Nominal Analogical Proportions Do Not Fail. In: Davis, J., Tabia, K. (eds) Scalable Uncertainty Management. SUM 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12322. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58449-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58449-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58448-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58449-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics