[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
create a website
Valuing Animal Welfare Labels with Experimental Auctions: What do we learn from Consumers?. (2009). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Loureiro, Maria ; Gracia, Azucena .
In: 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China.
RePEc:ags:iaae09:51918.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 4

Citations received by this document

Cites: 14

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Farmer Preferences for Agricultural Soil Carbon Sequestration Schemes. (2018). Gramig, Benjamin.
    In: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy.
    RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:40:y:2018:i:3:p:502-521..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Organic- and Animal Welfare-labelled Eggs: Competing for the Same Consumers?. (2016). Alfnes, Frode ; Gerini, Francesca ; Schjoll, Alexander .
    In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:jageco:v:67:y:2016:i:2:p:471-490.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Application of Regression Discontinuity Approach in Experimental Auctions: A Case Study of Gaining Participants’ Trust and Their Willingness to Pay. (2016). Li, Hao ; Elbakidze, Levan.
    In: 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts.
    RePEc:ags:aaea16:236149.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Consumer Preferences for Verified Pork-Rearing Practices in the Production of Ham Products. (2013). Widmar, Nicole ; Foster, Kenneth ; Ortega, David L. ; McKendree, Melissa G. S., .
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:165935.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Carslsson, F., P. Frykblom, and C.J. Lagerkvist. 2007. Consumer Willingness to Pay for Farm Animal Welfare: Mobile Abattoirs versus Transportation to Slaughter. European Review of Agricultural Economics 34(3):321-344.

  2. Corrigan J.R., and Rousu M.C., (2006). The effect of initial endowments in experimental auctions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88 (2), 448-547.

  3. Dawkins, M. S., 2006. A Users Guide to Animal Welfare Science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21, 77-82.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Effect of Information about Animal Welfare, expressed in terms of rearing Conditions, on Lamb Acceptability. Meat Science, 77: 431-436. Napolitano, F. C. Pacelli, A. Girolami, and A. Braghieri. 2008. Effect of Information about Animal Welfare on Consumer Willigness to Pay for Yogurt. Journal of Dairy Science, 91:910-917.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Fraser, D., 1995. Science, values and animal welfare: exploring the inextricable connection. Animal Welfare 4, 103-117.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Herper G., and Henson S., 2001. Consumer concerns about animal welfare and the impact on food choice. Centre for Food Economics Research. United Kingdom.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 46, 409-421. Webster, J., 2005. Animal Welfare Limping Towards Eden. Blackwell Publishing.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Lagerkvist, C.J., F. Carlsoon, D. Viske. 2006. Swedish Consumer Prefernces for Animal Welfare and Biotech: A Choice Experiment. AgBioForum, 9(1):51-58.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Liljenstolpe, C. 2007. Evaluating Animal Welfare with Choice Experiments: An Application to Swedish Pig Production. Agribusiness, 24(1):67-84.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Lusk J.L., and Shrogren J.F., 2007. Experimental auctions: methods and applications in economic and marketing research. Cambridge University Press.UK.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  11. Lusk J.L., Feldkamp T., and Schroeder T.C., 2004. Experimental auctions procedure: impact on valuation of quality differentiated goods. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86 (2), 389-405.

  12. Meehan H., Cowan C., and McIntrye B., 2002. Food choice and consumer concerns about animal welfare in Ireland. The National Food Center, TEAGASC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Moynagh J., 2000. EU regulation and consumer demand for animal welfare.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Shogren J.F., Margolis M., Koo C., and List A., 2001. A random nth-price auction.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Bundling food labels: What role could the labels “Organic,” “Local” and “Low Fat” play in fostering the demand for animal?friendly meat. (2022). Revoredogiha, Cesar ; Glenk, Klaus ; Akaichi, Faical.
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:38:y:2022:i:2:p:349-370.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Wild Boar Meat as a Sustainable Substitute for Pork: A Mixed Methods Approach. (2021). Lang, Daniel ; Zelen, Jii ; Machakova, Karolina ; Vin, Zbynk.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2490-:d:505816.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. To pay or not to pay? Cost information processing in the valuation of publicly funded healthcare. (2021). Genie, Mesfin G ; Krucien, Nicolas ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:276:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621001544.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. An analysis of the impacts of tasting experience and peer effects on consumers’ willingness to pay for novel foods. (2020). Olsen, Søren ; Alemu, Mohammed Hussen.
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:36:y:2020:i:4:p:653-674.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Labels for a Local Food Speciality Product: The Case of Saffron. (2020). Sanjuán López, Ana ; Resanoezcaray, Helena ; Sanjuanlopez, Ana I.
    In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:jageco:v:71:y:2020:i:3:p:778-797.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Consumer preferences for wild game cured meat label: do attitudes towards animal welfare matter?. (2020). Caputo, Vincenzina ; Gaviglio, Anna ; Demartini, Eugenio ; Marescotti, Maria Elena.
    In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Review.
    RePEc:ags:ifaamr:307606.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Understanding the U.S. Publics’ Voting on Animal Welfare and Genetically Modified Organism Labeling Ballot Initiatives. (2020). Rice, Emma D ; Hopkins, Kelsey A.
    In: 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri.
    RePEc:ags:aaea20:304519.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. THE STATUS QUO IN DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: IS IT RELEVANT?. (2019). Powe, Neil ; Willis, Ken ; Norhidayah, Wan.
    In: The Singapore Economic Review (SER).
    RePEc:wsi:serxxx:v:65:y:2019:i:02:n:s0217590819500036.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Synergies and Trade-Offs for Sustainable Food Production in Sweden: An Integrated Approach. (2019). Ellstrom, Daniel ; Wirehn, Lotten ; Talle, Malin ; Metson, Genevieve ; Wennergren, Uno ; Neset, Tina-Simone ; Lindstrom, Tom ; Jensen, Per ; Huge-Brodin, Maria ; Hjerpe, Mattias.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:601-:d:200287.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Farmer Preferences for Agricultural Soil Carbon Sequestration Schemes. (2018). Gramig, Benjamin.
    In: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy.
    RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:40:y:2018:i:3:p:502-521..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Towards a broad-based and holistic framework of Sustainable Intensification indicators. (2018). Crute, I ; Mahon, N ; Islam, M M ; Simmons, E A ; di Bonito, M.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:77:y:2018:i:c:p:576-597.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Value of labeling credence attributes—common structures and individual preferences. (2018). Roosen, Jutta ; Rungie, Cam ; Dahlhausen, Johanna Lena .
    In: Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:agecon:v:49:y:2018:i:6:p:741-751.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Can insects increase food security in developing countries? An analysis of Kenyan consumer preferences and demand for cricket flour buns. (2017). Olsen, Søren ; Alemu, Mohammed Hussen ; Pambo, Kennedy O ; Kinyuru, John N ; Vedel, Suzanne E.
    In: Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food.
    RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:9:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s12571-017-0676-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Mandatory integrated pest management in the European Union: experimental insights on consumers’ reactions. (2017). marette, stéphan ; Lefebvre, Marianne ; gomez y paloma, sergio ; Biguzzi, C ; Sutan, A ; Mateu, G ; S. R. H. Langrell, ; Ginon, E.
    In: Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies.
    RePEc:spr:roafes:v:98:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s41130-017-0041-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Citizens, consumers and farm animal welfare: A meta-analysis of willingness-to-pay studies. (2017). Panzone, Luca ; Clark, Beth ; Frewer, Lynn J ; Kyriazakis, Ilias ; Stewart, Gavin B.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:68:y:2017:i:c:p:112-127.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Cow Welfare in the U.S. Dairy Industry: Willingness-to-Pay and Willingness-to-Supply. (2017). Tonsor, Glynn ; Wolf, Christopher A.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:257996.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Integrating sensory evaluations in incentivized discrete choice experiments to assess consumer demand for cricket flour buns in Kenya. (2016). Olsen, Søren ; Alemu, Mohammed Hussen ; Pambo, Kennedy O ; Kinyuru, John ; Vedel, Suzanne E.
    In: IFRO Working Paper.
    RePEc:foi:wpaper:2016_02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Consumer willingness to pay for animal welfare attributes in a developing country context: The case of chicken in Nairobi, Kenya. (2015). Otieno, David ; Ogutu, Sylvester .
    In: 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy.
    RePEc:ags:iaae15:212602.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Mandatory Integrated Pest Management in the European Union: Experimental insights on consumers reactions. (2015). Sutan, Angela ; marette, stéphan ; Lefebvre, Marianne ; gomez y paloma, sergio ; Mateu, G ; Biguzzi, C ; Ginon, E.
    In: 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy.
    RePEc:ags:iaae15:212038.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Consumer Preferences for Welfare Friendly Production Methods: The Case of Chicken Production in Western Australia. (2015). Mugera, Amin ; burton, michael ; Patterson, Jacinta .
    In: 2015 Conference (59th), February 10-13, 2015, Rotorua, New Zealand.
    RePEc:ags:aare15:202567.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Social Evaluation Approaches in Landscape Projects. (2014). Miccoli, Saverio ; Murro, Rocco ; Finucci, Fabrizio.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:11:p:7906-7920:d:42141.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Is Choice Experiment Becoming more Popular than Contingent Valuation? A Systematic Review in Agriculture, Environment and Health. (2014). Wolff, François-Charles ; Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre ; Andersson, Henrik ; Beaumais, Olivier ; Crastes, Romain .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fae:wpaper:2014.12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The Role of the Beneficiary in Willingness to Pay for Socially Responsible Products: A Meta-analysis. (2014). Tully, Stephanie M ; Winer, Russell S.
    In: Journal of Retailing.
    RePEc:eee:jouret:v:90:y:2014:i:2:p:255-274.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Consumers’ valuation of sustainability labels on meat. (2014). Verbeke, Wim ; Van Loo, Ellen ; Nayga, Rodolfo ; Caputo, Vincenzina.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:49:y:2014:i:p1:p:137-150.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Value elicitation for multiple quantities of a quasi-public good using open ended choice experiments and uniform price auctions. (2014). Nayga, Rodolfo ; McIntosh, Christopher ; Elbakidze, Levan ; Li, Hao.
    In: Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:agecon:v:45:y:2014:i:2:p:253-265.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Residential preferences for stable electricity supply and a reduction in air pollution risk: a benefit transfer study using choice modeling in China. (2013). Komatsu, Satoru ; Kaneko, Shinji ; Ohdoko, Taro .
    In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:envpol:v:15:y:2013:i:3:p:309-328.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Effects of Carbon Reduction Labels: Evidence From Scanner Data. (2013). Kortelainen, Mika ; Roussillon, Beatrice ; Raychaudhuri, Jibonayan.
    In: The School of Economics Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:man:sespap:1309.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Do experimental auction estimates pass the scope test?. (2013). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Loureiro, Maria ; Gracia, Azucena .
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:37:y:2013:i:c:p:7-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Consumer Preferences for Verified Pork-Rearing Practices in the Production of Ham Products. (2013). Widmar, Nicole ; Foster, Kenneth ; Ortega, David L. ; McKendree, Melissa G. S., .
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:165935.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Public preferences for forest ecosystem management in Japan with emphasis on species diversity. (2012). Ohdoko, Taro ; Yoshida, Kentaro.
    In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:envpol:v:14:y:2012:i:2:p:147-169.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Do consumers’ preferences change when on vacation? A willingness to pay study on apples and honey. (2012). Mørkbak, Morten ; Jensen, Jorgen.
    In: 2012 AAEA/EAAE Food Environment Symposium.
    RePEc:ags:aaeafe:123525.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. The market for animal welfare. (2011). Lusk, Jayson.
    In: Agriculture and Human Values.
    RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:28:y:2011:i:4:p:561-575.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Willingness-to-pay in terms of price: an application to organic beef during and after the “mad cow” crisis. (2011). Corsi, Alessandro ; Novelli, Silvia.
    In: Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement.
    RePEc:rae:jourae:v:92:y:2011:i:1:p:25-46.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Animal Welfare and Eggs – Cheap Talk or Money on the Counter?. (2011). Andersen, Laura.
    In: IFRO Working Paper.
    RePEc:foi:wpaper:2010_06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. On mandatory labeling of animal welfare attributes. (2011). Wolf, Christopher ; Tonsor, Glynn.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:36:y:2011:i:3:p:430-437.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. A calibrated auction-conjoint valuation method: Valuing pork and eggs produced under differing animal welfare conditions. (2011). Norwood, Bailey ; Lusk, Jayson.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:62:y:2011:i:1:p:80-94.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Random preferences towards bioenergy environmental externalities: A case study of woody biomass based electricity in the Southern United States. (2011). Lal, Pankaj ; Susaeta, Andres ; Alavalapati, Janaki ; Mercer, Evan .
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:33:y:2011:i:6:p:1111-1118.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Willingness to pay for other species well-being. (2011). Cameron, Trudy ; Naald, Brian Vander .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:70:y:2011:i:7:p:1325-1335.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Willingness-to-pay in terms of price: an application to organic beef during and after the “mad cow” crisis. (2011). Corsi, Alessandro ; Novelli, Silvia.
    In: Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud).
    RePEc:ags:frraes:189338.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. A Dual Response Choice Experiments (DRCE) design to assess rabbit meat preference in Catalonia: A Heteroescedatistic Extreme-Value Model. (2011). Kallas, Zein ; Gil, Jose Maria.
    In: 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland.
    RePEc:ags:eaae11:114779.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Is there a Finnish Animal Welfare Kuznets Curve?. (2011). Kosenius, Anna-Kaisa ; Kulmala, Soile ; Lindroos, Marko ; Lombardini, Chiara .
    In: 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland.
    RePEc:ags:eaae11:114379.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. The Effect of Proposition 2 on the Demand for Eggs in California. (2010). Lusk, Jayson.
    In: Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization.
    RePEc:bpj:bjafio:v:8:y:2010:i:1:n:3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Farm Animal Welfare, Consumer Willingness to Pay, and Trust: Results of a Cross-National Survey. (2010). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Nocella, Giuseppe ; Hubbard, Lionel J..
    In: 2010 Conference, August 26-27, 2010, Nelson, New Zealand.
    RePEc:ags:nzar10:96832.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Consumer voting and demand behavior regarding swine gestation crates. (2009). Wolf, Christopher ; Widmar, Nicole ; Tonsor, Glynn ; Olynk, Nicole .
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:34:y:2009:i:6:p:492-498.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Valuing Quality Attributes and Country of Origin in the Korean Beef Market. (2009). Chung, Chanjin ; Boyer, Tracy ; Han, Sungill .
    In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:jageco:v:60:y:2009:i:3:p:682-698.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Valuing Animal Welfare Labels with Experimental Auctions: What do we learn from Consumers?. (2009). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Loureiro, Maria ; Gracia, Azucena .
    In: 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China.
    RePEc:ags:iaae09:51918.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Korean Consumers’ Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Domestic versus U.S. and Australian Beef with Alternative Attributes. (2008). Umberger, Wendy ; Calkins, Chris R..
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6172.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare Attributes: Case of Gestation Crates. (2008). Wolf, Christopher ; Widmar, Nicole ; Tonsor, Glynn ; Olynk, Nicole .
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6062.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Mandatory integrated pest management in the European Union: experimental insights on consumers’ reactions. (). Sutan, Angela ; gomez y paloma, sergio ; Mateu, G ; Marette, S ; Langrell, S. R. H., ; Ginon, E ; Biguzzi, C ; Lefebvre, M.
    In: Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies.
    RePEc:ags:frrfes:277883.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-25 06:25:01 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.