[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
create a website
Public preferences for forest ecosystem management in Japan with emphasis on species diversity. (2012). Ohdoko, Taro ; Yoshida, Kentaro.
In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
RePEc:spr:envpol:v:14:y:2012:i:2:p:147-169.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 5

Citations received by this document

Cites: 49

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Ordering effects in discrete choice experiments: A systematic literature review across domains. (2024). Boxebeld, Sander.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:51:y:2024:i:c:s1755534524000216.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Valuation of coral reefs in Japan: Willingness to pay for conservation and the effect of information. (2020). Managi, Shunsuke ; Fujii, Masahiko ; Yamano, Hiroya ; Yoshida, Yumi ; Kumagai, Naoki H ; Takano, Kohei Takenaka ; Imamura, Kohei ; Nakashizuka, Tohru.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:46:y:2020:i:c:s221204162030108x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. A Monte Carlo Evaluation of the Logit-Mixed Logit under Asymmetry and Multimodality. (2017). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Thiene, Mara ; Franceschinis, Cristiano ; Scarpan, Riccardo.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:wai:econwp:17/23.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Towards a common standard – A reporting checklist for web-based stated preference valuation surveys and a critique for mode surveys. (2016). TSAGARAKIS, KONSTANTINOS ; Olsen, Søren ; Menegaki, Angeliki .
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:18:y:2016:i:c:p:18-50.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Who blames corruption for the poor enforcement of environmental laws? Survey evidence from Brazil. (2014). Aklin, Michaël ; Harish, S. ; Bayer, Patrick ; Urpelainen, Johannes.
    In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:envpol:v:16:y:2014:i:3:p:241-262.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Adamowicz WL, Boxall PC, Williams M, Louviere JJ (1998) Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. Am J Agric Econ 80(1):64–75.

  2. Aldrich GA, Grimsrud KM, Thacher JA, Kotchen MJ (2007) Relating environmental attitudes and contingent values: how robust are methods for identifying preference heterogeneity? Environ Resource Econ 37:757–775.

  3. Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Econ J 100:464–477.

  4. Andrews RL, Currim IS (2003) Retention of latent segments in regression-based marketing models. Int J Res Mark 20:315–321.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  5. Azqueta D, Sotelsek D (2007) Valuing nature: from environmental impacts to natural capital. Ecol Econ 63:22–30.

  6. Bartelmus P (2009) The cost of natural capital consumption: accounting for a sustainable world economy. Ecol Econ 68:1850–1857.

  7. Bienabe E, Hearne RR (2006) Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and scenic beauty within a framework of environmental services payments. For Policy Econ 9:335–348.

  8. Birol E, Hanley N, Koundouri P, Kountouris Y (2009) Optimal management of wetlands: quantifying trade-offs between flood risks, recreation, and biodiversity conservation. Water Resour Res 45:W11426. doi: 10.1029/2008WR006955 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  9. Carlsson F, Frykblom P, Lagerkvist CJ (2007) Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare: mobile abattoirs versus transportation to slaughter. Eur Rev Agric Econ 34(3):321–344.

  10. Carlsson F, Frykblom P, Liljenstolpe C (2003) Valuing wetland attributes: an application of choice experiments. Ecol Econ 47:95–103.

  11. Christie M, Hanley N, Warren J, Murphy K, Wright R, Hyde T (2006) Valuing the diversity of biodiversity. Ecol Econ 58:304–317.

  12. Chrzan K (1994) Three kinds of order effects in choice-based conjoint analysis. Mark Lett 5(2):165–172.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  13. Dasgupta P (2009) The welfare economic theory of green national accounts. Environ Resour Econ 42:3–38.

  14. De Blaeij AT, Nunes PALD, van den Bergh JCJM (2007) ‘No-Choice’ options within a nested logit model: one model is insufficient. Appl Econ 39(10):1245–1252.

  15. Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S (2008) Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol Econ 65:663–674.

  16. Engelbrecht HJ (2009) Natural capital, subjective well-being, and the new welfare economics of sustainability: some evidence from cross-country regressions. Ecol Econ 69:380–388.

  17. Farrar S, Ryan M (1999) Response-ordering effects: a methodological issue in conjoint analysis. Health Econ 8:75–79.

  18. Fenichel EP, Lupi F, Hoehn JP, Kaplowitz MD (2009) Split-sample tests of “No-Opinion” responses in an attribute-based choice model. Land Econ 85(2):348–362.

  19. Garber-Yonts B, Kerkvliet J, Johnson R (2004) Public values for biodiversity conservation policies in the Oregon coast range. For Sci 50(5):589–602.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  20. Gilbride TJ, Allenby GM (2006) Estimating heterogeneous EBA and economic screening rule choice models. Mark Sci 25(5):494–509.

  21. Greene W, Hensher D (2003) A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit. Transp Res Part B Methodol 37:681–698.

  22. Hanley N, Wright RE, Adamowicz WL (1998) Using choice experiments to value the environment. Environ Resour Econ 11(3/4):413–428.

  23. Horne P, Boxall PC, Adamowicz WL (2005) Multiple-use management of forest recreation sites: a spatially explicit choice experiment. For Ecol Manag 207:189–199.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Jöbstl HA (2009) Innovations in forestry accounting: integration of forest assets and non-market environmental benefits into management and national accounting and reporting. Aust J For Sci 1/2:1–4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Japan Biodiversity Outlook Science Committee, the Ministry of the Environment (2010) Report of comprehensive assessment of biodiversity in Japan. http://www.biodic.go.jp/biodiversity/shiraberu/policy/jbo/jbo/f iles/Japan_Biodiversity_Outlook_EN.pdf . Retrieved 6 Oct 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Kjær T, Bech M, Gyrd-Hansen D, Hart-Hansen K (2006) Ordering effect and price sensitivity in discrete choice experiments: need we worry? Health Econ 15:1217–1228.

  27. Kontoleon A, Yabe M (2006) Market segmentation analysis of preferences for GM derived animal foods in the UK. J Agric Food Ind Organ 4(1):Article 8.

  28. Krinsky I, Robb AL (1986) On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Rev Econ Stat 68:715–719.

  29. Kunimitsu Y (2005) Jumin no Riyo Jokyo kara mita Nouson Sinsui Koen no Yuchiken-iki ni kansuru Kenkyu: Kakuritsu-gata Gravity-Model no Shisetsu Keikaku e no Tekiyo Kanosei (in Japanese). A study on the influence range of the rural park in view of the residents’ evaluation and usage: an approach with using the CV Model and the gravity model. Noson Keikaku Gakkaishi (J Rural Plan Assoc) 23(4):265–274.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Kuriyama K, Hanemann WM, Hilger JR (2010) A latent segmentation approach to a Kuhn–Tucker model: an application to recreation demand. J Environ Econ Manag 60:209–220.

  31. Lehtonen E, Kuuluvainen J, Pouta E, Rekola M, Li C (2003) Non-market benefits of forest conservation in Southern Finland. Environ Sci Policy 6:195–204.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  32. Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD (2000) Stated choice methods: analysis and application. Cambridge University Press, UK.

  33. Luce RD, Tukey JW (1964) Simultaneous conjoint measurement: a new type of fundamental measurement. J Math Psychol 1:1–27.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Mallawaarachchi T, Blamey RK, Morrison MD, Johnson AKL, Bennett JW (2001) Community values for environmental protection in a cane farming catchment in Northern Australia: a choice modelling study. J Environ Manag 62:301–316.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka P (ed) Frontiers in econometrics. Academic Press, New York, pp 105–142.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystem and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  37. Naidoo R, Adamowicz WL (2005) Biodiversity and nature-based tourism at forest reserves in Uganda. Environ Dev Econ 10:159–178.

  38. Nielsen AB, Olsen SB, Lundhede T (2007) An economic valuation of the recreational benefits associated with nature-based forest management practices. Landsc Urban Plan 80:63–71.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  39. Nunes PALD, de Blaeij AT, van den Bergh JCJM (2009) Decomposition of warm glow for multiple stakeholders: stated choice valuation of shellfishery policy. Land Econ 85(3):485–499.

  40. Nunes PALD, van den Bergh JCJM (2001) Economic valuation of biodiversity: sense or nonsense? Ecol Econ 39:203–222.

  41. Ojea E, Nunes PALD, Loureiro ML (2010) Mapping biodiversity indicators and assessing biodiversity values in global forests. Environ Resource Econ 47:329–347.

  42. Poe GL, Giraud KL, Loomis JB (2005) Computational methods for measuring the difference of empirical distributions. Am J Agric Econ 87(2):353–365.

  43. Revelt D, Train K (1998) Mixed logit with repeated choice: households’ choices of appliance efficiency level. Rev Econ Stat 80(4):647–657.

  44. Ryan M, Skåtun D (2004) Modelling non-demanders in choice experiment. Health Econ 13:397–402.

  45. Scott A, Vick S (1999) Patients, doctors and contracts: an application of principal-agent theory to the doctor–patient relationship. Scot J Polit Econ 46(2):111–134.

  46. Shapansky B, Adamowicz WL, Boxall PC (2008) Assessing information provision and respondent involvement effects on preferences. Ecol Econ 65:626–635.

  47. Siikamäki J, Layton DF (2007) Discrete choice survey experiments: a comparison using flexible methods. J Environ Econ Manag 53:122–139.

  48. Thurston LL (1927) A law of comparative judgment. Psychol Rev 34(4):278–286.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  49. Wang X, Bennett J, Xie C, Zhang Z, Liang D (2007) Estimating non-market environmental benefits of the conversion of cropland to forest and grassland program: a choice modeling approach. Ecol Econ 63:114–125.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Demand response to improved walking infrastructure: A study into the economics of walking and health behaviour change. (2015). Longo, Alberto ; Kee, Frank ; Tully, Mark A ; Hunter, Ruth F ; Hutchinson, George W.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:143:y:2015:i:c:p:107-116.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Valuing type and scope of ecosystem conservation: A meta-analysis. (2015). HUSSAIN, Anwar ; Phillips, Spencer ; Hjerpe, Evan .
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:21:y:2015:i:1:p:32-50.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Valuing Grassland Restoration: Proximity to Substitutes and Trade-offs among Conservation Attributes. (2014). Dissanayake, Sahan ; Ando, Amy ; Sahan T. M. Dissanayake, .
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:90:y:2014:ii:1:p:237-259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The influence of individuals in forming collective household preferences for water quality. (2014). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Rungie, Cam ; Thiene, Mara.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:68:y:2014:i:1:p:161-174.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The Effects of Intertemporal Considerations on Consumer Preferences for Biofuels. (2013). Khachatryan, Hayk ; casavant, ken ; Joireman, Jeff.
    In: 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea13:150334.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. How Can Behavioral Economics Inform Nonmarket Valuation? An Example from the Preference Reversal Literature. (2011). list, john ; Alevy, Jonathan ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:87:y:2011:iii:1:p:365-381.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The Equity-Efficiency Trade-off in Environmental Policy: Evidence from Stated Preferences. (2010). Atkinson, Giles ; Dietz, Simon.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:86:y:2010:iii:1:p423-443.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Preferences for long-term care services: Willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment. (2010). Koolman, Xander ; Nieboer, Anna P. ; Stolk, Elly A..
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:9:p:1317-1325.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Identifying Consumer Preferences for Nutrition Information on Grocery Store Shelf Labels. (2009). McCluskey, Jill ; Chouinard, Hayley ; Berning, Joshua ; Sprott, David ; Manning, Kenneth.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:uconnr:149962.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Sequencing Anomalies in Choice Experiments. (2008). pinto-prades, jose-luis ; Day, Brett ; Jose Luis Pinto Prades, ; PintoPrades, Jose Luis.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pab:wpaper:08.10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Introducing a genetically modified banana in Uganda: Social benefits, costs, and consumer perceptions. (2008). Wesseler, Justus ; Falck Zepeda, José ; Kilkuwe, Enoch ; Falck-Zepeda, Jose.
    In: IFPRI discussion papers.
    RePEc:fpr:ifprid:767.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. When more is less: the effect of multiple health and nutritional labels in food product choice. (2008). de Magistris, Tiziana ; Barreiro-Hurlé, Jesús ; Gracia, A. ; de-Magistris, T. ; Barreiro-Hurle, J..
    In: 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium.
    RePEc:ags:eaae08:44013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Modeling Yeah- and Nay-Saying to Alternatives in Conjoint Experiments. (2008). Hu, Wuyang.
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6346.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Optimizing Farmland Preservation Choices Across Communities and Jurisdictional Scales: To What Extent are Amenity Values and Selection Criteria Transferable?. (2008). Johnston, Robert ; Duke, Joshua ; Kukielka, Jessica G..
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6243.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiments method?. (2007). Rambonilaza, Tina.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:9225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. What Determines Prediction Errors In Benefits Transfer Models?. (2007). Hanley, Nick ; Colombo, Sergio.
    In: 81st Annual Conference, April 2-4, 2007, Reading University, UK.
    RePEc:ags:aes007:7967.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Public Funding of Environmental Amenities: Contingent Choices Using New Taxes or Existing Revenues for Coastal Land Conservation. (2006). Swallow, Stephen ; McGonagle, Michael P..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:82:y:2006:i:1:p:56-67.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Models. (2006). Siikamäki, Juha ; DavidF. Layton, .
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. A NEW MARKETING SEGMENTATION APPROACH BASED ON MARGINAL INDIVIDUAL UTILITIES: APPLYING CRM IS NOT A CHIMERA ANYMORE. (2006). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Uncovering the Macrostructure of Tourists’ Preferences. A Choice Experiment Analysis of Tourism Demand to Sardinia. (2006). Cao, Davide ; Brau, Rinaldo.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2006.33.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Opportunities to Improve Household Food Security Through Promoting Informal Maize Marketing Channels: Experience from Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. (2006). Traub, Lulama ; Jayne, Thomas.
    In: Food Security International Development Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:midiwp:54568.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. HYPOTHETICAL (NON)BIAS IN CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: EVIDENCE FROM FRESHWATER PRAWNS. (2005). Hudson, Darren ; Gallardo, R. Karina ; Hanson, Terry .
    In: Experimental.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpex:0503003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Preferences regarding road transports of hazardous materials using choice experiments - any sign of biases?. (2005). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2005_030.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Giuda, Alita ; Turner, Robert W. ; Noddin, Laura.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:17:y:2005:i:7:p:1-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Turner, Robert ; Giuda, Alita ; Noddin, Laura.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-05q30001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Uncovering the macrostructure of tourists preferences. A choice experiment analysis of tourism demand to Sardinia. (2005). Cao, Davide ; Brau, Rinaldo.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200514.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Exploring Consumer Valuation and Preference Heterogeneity for Functional Foods Using a Choice Experiment: A Case Study of Tomato Juice Containing Soy in Ohio. (2005). Hooker, Neal ; Teratanavat, Ratapol.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19556.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. A Battle of Taste and Environmental Convictions for Ecolabeled Seafood: A Choice Experiment. (2005). Roheim, Cathy ; Johnston, Robert.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19357.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. HECKIT MODELLING OF THE TWO-STAGE TOURIST CHOICE PROCESS: GOING ON HOLIDAY AND TOURISM EXPENDITURES. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2004-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. STOCHASTIC CHOICE ANALYSIS OF TOURISM DESTINATIONS. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Using Choice Experiments to Assess Peoples Preferences for Railway Transports of Hazardous Materials. (2004). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2004_006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. WHO ARE RESOURCE NONUSERS AND WHAT CAN THEY TELL US ABOUT NONUSE VALUES? AN APPLICATION TO COASTAL WETLAND RESTORATION. (2004). Opaluch, James ; Johnston, Robert ; Mazzotta, Marisa J. ; Magnusson, Gisele.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20353.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. THE VALUE OF THE VIEW: VALUING SCENIC QUALITY USING CHOICE AND CONTINGENT VALUATION MODELS. (2004). Kask, Susan ; Stewart, Steve ; Mathews, Leah Greden .
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20049.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. AN APPLICATION OF CHOICE MODELING TO MEASURE U.S. CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS. (2004). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Govindasamy, Ramu ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:19964.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. A CHOICE EXPERIMENT MODEL FOR BEEF ATTRIBUTES: WHAT CONSUMER PREFERENCES TELL US. (2004). Umberger, Wendy ; Loureiro, Maria.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:19931.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Estimating the monetary value of health care: lessons from environmental economics. (2003). Wright, Robert ; Hanley, Nick ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:12:y:2003:i:1:p:3-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Preferences for Alternative Moose Management Regimes among Finnish Landowners: A Choice Experiment Approach. (2003). Petajisto, Leena ; Horne, Paula .
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:79:y:2003:i:4:p:472-482.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope. (2003). Mourato, Susana.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:24:y:2003:i:2:p:141-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Using Stated Preference Methods for Biodiversity Valuation. A critical analysis. (2003). Froer, Oliver.
    In: Diskussionspapiere aus dem Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Hohenheim.
    RePEc:hoh:hohdip:217.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. The Value of Road and Railway Safety - an Overview. (2003). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2003_013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. SELF IMAGE AND CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: HYPOTHETICAL AND ACTUAL WILLINGNESS TO PAY. (2003). Johansson-Stenman, Olof ; Svedsater, Henrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0094.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Spatial Factors and Stated Preference Values for Public Goods: Considerations for Rural Land Use. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana Marie .
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:78:y:2002:i:4:p:481-500.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Comparing Choice Question Formats for Evaluating Natural Resource Tradeoffs. (2002). Rowe, Robert D. ; Breffle, William S..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:78:y:2002:i:2:p:298-314.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Broadband delivered entertainment services: forecasting Australian subscription intentions. (2002). Madden, Gary ; Savage, Scott ; Simpson, Michael .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:10915.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. STATED PREFERENCES AND LENGTH OF RESIDENCY IN RURAL COMMUNITIES: ARE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSERVATION VALUES HETEROGENEOUS?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana Marie .
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19683.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. ARE STATED PREFERENCES INVARIANT TO THE PROSPECT OF REAL-MONEY CHOICE?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Newell, Laurienne Whinstanley.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Risk Perception of Traffic Participants. (2001). van Vuuren, Daniel ; Blaeij, Adriana ; de Blaeij, Arianne .
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20010027.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Complements, Substitutes, Budget Constraints and Valuation. (2000). Hailu, Atakelty ; Boxall, Peter ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:16:y:2000:i:1:p:51-68.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. THE INFLUENCE OF SPATIAL LAND USE PATTERNS ON RURAL AMENITY VALUES AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM A CONTINGENT CHOICE SURVEY. (2000). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana M..
    In: 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL.
    RePEc:ags:aaea00:21766.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Valuing Multiple Programs to Improve Fish Populations. (1999). DavidF. Layton, ; Plummer, Mark L. ; Brown, Gardner .
    In: Discussion Papers in Economics at the University of Washington.
    RePEc:fth:washer:0042.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-25 17:34:47 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.