[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Short-term memory in olfactory network dynamics

Nature volume 402, pages 664–668 (1999)Cite this article

Abstract

Neural assemblies in a number of animal species display self-organized, synchronized oscillations in response to sensory stimuli in a variety of brain areas.1,2,3,4,5. In the olfactory system of insects, odour-evoked oscillatory synchronization of antennal lobe projection neurons (PNs) is superimposed on slower and stimulus-specific temporal activity patterns. Hence, each odour activates a specific and dynamic projection neuron assembly whose evolution during a stimulus is locked to the oscillation clock6,7. Here we examine, using locusts, the changes in population dynamics of projection-neuron assemblies over repeated odour stimulations, as would occur when an animal first encounters and then repeatedly samples an odour for identification or localization. We find that the responses of these assemblies rapidly decrease in intensity, while they show a marked increase in spike time precision and inter-neuronal oscillatory coherence. Once established, this enhanced precision in the representation endures for several minutes. This change is stimulus-specific, and depends on events within the antennal lobe circuits, independent of olfactory receptor adaptation: it may thus constitute a form of sensory memory. Our results suggest that this progressive change in olfactory network dynamics serves to converge, over repeated odour samplings, on a more precise and readily classifiable odour representation, using relational information contained across neural assemblies.

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Response intensity decreases, while coherence and spike time precision increase, over repeated odour presentations.
Figure 2: Response evolution is caused by a wide variety of stimulation regimes.
Figure 3: The tendency to oscillate in response to an odour endures for several minutes and is odour-specific.
Figure 4: The evolution in antennal lobe dynamics depends on changes within the antennal lobe.
Figure 5: Individual PN responses to odours evolve over repeated trials, leading to more accurate odour classification.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adrian,E. D. Olfactory reactions in the brain of the hedgehog. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 100, 459–473 (1942).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eckhorn,R. et al. Coherent oscillations: A mechanism of feature linking in the visual system? Biol. Cybern. 60, 121– 130 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gray,C. M., Koenig,P., Engel,A. K. & Singer,W. Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties. Nature 338, 334–337 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gelperin,A. & Tank,D. W. Odour-modulated collective network oscillations of olfactory interneurons in a terrestrial mollusc. Nature 345, 437–440 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Prechtl,J. C. Visual motion induces synchronous oscillations in turtle visual cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 12467– 12471 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Laurent,G., Wehr,M. & Davidowitz, H. Temporal representations of odors in an olfactory network. J. Neurosci. 16, 3837– 3847 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wehr,M. & Laurent,G. Odour encoding by temporal sequences of firing in oscillating neural assemblies. Nature 384, 162–166 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Freeman,W. J. Spatial properties of an EEG event in the olfactory bulb and cortex. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 44, 586– 605 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gray,C. M. & Skinner,J. E. Centrifugal regulation of neuronal activity in the olfactory bulb of the waking rabbit as revealed by reversible cryogenic blockade. Exp. Brain. Res. 69, 378–386 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mellon,D. Physiological characterization of antennular flicking reflexes in the crayfish. J. Comp. Physiol. A 180, 553– 565 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Murlis,J., Elkington,J. S. & Cardé, R. T. Odor plumes and how insects use them. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37, 505–532 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Laurent,G. & Davidowitz,H. Encoding of olfactory information with oscillating neural assemblies. Science 265, 1872–1875 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Laurent,G. & Naraghi,M. Odorant-induced oscillations in the mushroom bodies of the locust. J. Neurosci. 14 , 2993–3004 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. MacLeod,K. & Laurent,G. Distinct mechanisms for synchronization and temporal patterning of odor-encoding neural assemblies. Science 274, 976–979 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Weht,M. & Laurent,G. Relationship between afferent and central temporal patterns in the locust olfactory system. J. Neurosci. 19, 381–390 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Masson,C. & Mustaparta,H. Chemical information processing in the olfactory system of insects. Physiol. Rev. 70 , 199–245 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Slifer,E. H. & Sekhon,S. S. The dendrites of the thin-walled olfactory pegs of the grasshopper (Orthoptera, Acrididae). J. Morphol. 114, 393–410 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. MacLeod,K., Bäcker,A. & Laurent, G. Who reads temporal information contained across synchronized and oscillatory spike trains? Nature 395, 693–698 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stopfer,M., Bhagavan,S., Smith,B. & Laurent,G. Impaired odour discrimination on desynchronization of odour-encoding neural assemblies. Nature 390, 70–74 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lawless,H. T. in Tasting and Smelling (eds Beauchamp, G. K. & Bartoshuk, L.) (Academic, San Diego, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kay,S. M. Modern Spectral Estimation (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1988).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank B. Smith for help with the statistical analysis of the data. This work was supported by an NRSA from the NIDCD (M.S.), and the NIDCD and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (G.L.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Biology, 139-74, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 91125, California, USA

    Mark Stopfer & Gilles Laurent

Authors
  1. Mark Stopfer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gilles Laurent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gilles Laurent.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stopfer, M., Laurent, G. Short-term memory in olfactory network dynamics. Nature 402, 664–668 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/45244

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/45244

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing