[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (1,568)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = weed control

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 9116 KiB  
Article
Cross-Modal Feature Fusion for Field Weed Mapping Using RGB and Near-Infrared Imagery
by Xijian Fan, Chunlei Ge, Xubing Yang and Weice Wang
Agriculture 2024, 14(12), 2331; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122331 - 19 Dec 2024
Abstract
The accurate mapping of weeds in agricultural fields is essential for effective weed control and enhanced crop productivity. Moving beyond the limitations of RGB imagery alone, this study presents a cross-modal feature fusion network (CMFNet) designed for precise weed mapping by integrating RGB [...] Read more.
The accurate mapping of weeds in agricultural fields is essential for effective weed control and enhanced crop productivity. Moving beyond the limitations of RGB imagery alone, this study presents a cross-modal feature fusion network (CMFNet) designed for precise weed mapping by integrating RGB and near-infrared (NIR) imagery. CMFNet first applies color space enhancement and adaptive histogram equalization to improve the image brightness and contrast in both RGB and NIR images. Building on a Transformer-based segmentation framework, a cross-modal multi-scale feature enhancement module is then introduced, featuring spatial and channel feature interaction to automatically capture complementary information across two modalities. The enhanced features are further fused and refined by integrating an attention mechanism, which reduces the background interference and enhances the segmentation accuracy. Extensive experiments conducted on two public datasets, the Sugar Beets 2016 and Sunflower datasets, demonstrate that CMFNet significantly outperforms CNN-based segmentation models in the task of weed and crop segmentation. The model achieved an Intersection over Union (IoU) metric of 90.86% and 90.77%, along with a Mean Accuracy (mAcc) of 93.8% and 94.35%, respectively. Ablation studies further validate that the proposed cross-modal fusion method provides substantial improvements over basic feature fusion methods, effectively localizing weed and crop regions across diverse field conditions. These findings underscore their potential as a robust solution for precise and adaptive weed mapping in complex agricultural landscapes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Digital Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Samples from Sugar Beets 2016 and Sunflower datasets. (<b>a</b>) from Sugar Beets 2016, and (<b>b</b>) from Sunflower dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Data augmentation using HSV and CLAHE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Structure diagram of CMFNet.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Structure diagram of Segformer Encoder–Decoder.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Cross-modal feature fusion module.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Structure of fusion feature refinement module.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>IoU performance of the proposed CMFNet compared to other methods on both datasets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Acc performance of the proposed CMFNet compared to other methods on both two datasets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Visual comparison of the proposed CMFNet compared to other segmentation methods on two datasets. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) represent the original RGB images, NIR images, and their corresponding ground-truth mask, respectively. (<b>d</b>–<b>k</b>) denote the predicted masks using Deeplab V3+, PSANet, GCNet, ISANet, OCRNet, Segformer-RGB, Segformer-NIR, and CMFNet.</p>
Full article ">
32 pages, 4231 KiB  
Review
Environmental Implication of Herbicide Use
by Małgorzata Baćmaga, Jadwiga Wyszkowska and Jan Kucharski
Molecules 2024, 29(24), 5965; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29245965 - 18 Dec 2024
Viewed by 227
Abstract
One of the guiding principles of the sustainable use of herbicides is their targeted action exclusively against weeds, consisting of blocking photosynthesis and synthesis of amino acids and growth regulators. Herbicides are major elements of plant production, indispensable to the functioning of modern [...] Read more.
One of the guiding principles of the sustainable use of herbicides is their targeted action exclusively against weeds, consisting of blocking photosynthesis and synthesis of amino acids and growth regulators. Herbicides are major elements of plant production, indispensable to the functioning of modern agriculture. Nevertheless, their influence on all elements of the natural environment needs to be continuously controlled. This review article summarizes research addressing the effects of herbicides on the natural environment and the changes they trigger therein. Herbicides, applied to protect crops against weed infestation, are usually mixtures of various active substances; hence, it is generally difficult to analyze their impact on the environment and organisms. Nonetheless, an attempt was made in this review to discuss the effects of selected herbicides on individual elements of the natural environment (water, soil, and air) and organisms (humans, animals, plants, and microorganisms). In addition, the article presents examples of the biodegradation of selected herbicides and mechanisms of their degradation by bacteria and fungi. Based on this information, it can be concluded that the uncontrolled use of herbicides has led to adverse effects on non-target organisms, as documented in the scientific literature. However, further research on the environmental effects of these chemicals is needed address the missing knowledge on this subject. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Analysis of Organic Pollutants, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Percentage of use of each group of pesticides worldwide in 2022. Own elaboration based on Statista Research Department [<a href="#B16-molecules-29-05965" class="html-bibr">16</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Countries which use the most pesticides in agriculture in 2022 (in 1.0 ton). Own elaboration based on Statista Research Department [<a href="#B16-molecules-29-05965" class="html-bibr">16</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Examples of bacteria showing potential to biodegrade herbicides are presented in the form of a phylogenetic tree based on sequences found in the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) database. The phylogenetic tree was created using MEGA 7 software by the neighbor-joining method [<a href="#B195-molecules-29-05965" class="html-bibr">195</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Biodegradation of atrazine in the environment by bacteria. The atrazine degradation pathway was made using ISIS Draw 2.3 software [<a href="#B30-molecules-29-05965" class="html-bibr">30</a>]. The process of biodegradation of herbicides by microorganisms is most often described on the basis of degradation pathways carried out by bacterial strains.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Examples of fungi showing potential to biodegrade herbicides are presented in the form of a phylogenetic tree based on sequences found in the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) database. The phylogenetic tree was created using MEGA 7 software by the neighbor-joining method [<a href="#B195-molecules-29-05965" class="html-bibr">195</a>].</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 2085 KiB  
Article
Impacts of Weed Resistance to Glyphosate on Herbicide Commercialization in Brazil
by Sergio de Oliveira Procópio, Robson Rolland Monticelli Barizon, Ricardo Antônio Almeida Pazianotto, Marcelo Augusto Boechat Morandi and Guilherme Braga Pereira Braz
Agriculture 2024, 14(12), 2315; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122315 - 17 Dec 2024
Viewed by 454
Abstract
Herbicides are essential tools for the phytosanitary security of agricultural areas, but their excessive use can cause problems in agricultural production systems and have negative impacts on human health and the environment. The objective of this study was to present and discuss the [...] Read more.
Herbicides are essential tools for the phytosanitary security of agricultural areas, but their excessive use can cause problems in agricultural production systems and have negative impacts on human health and the environment. The objective of this study was to present and discuss the main causes behind the increase in herbicide commercialization in Brazil between 2010 and 2020. Data from the Brazilian pesticide database, provided by the Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (IBAMA), were used. In 2010 and 2020, Brazil sold 157,512 and 329,697 tons of herbicide active ingredients, respectively, representing a 128.1% increase in commercialization over 11 years. Some herbicides, such as clethodim, haloxyfop-methyl, triclopyr, glufosinate, 2,4-D, diclosulam, and flumioxazin, showed increases in sales volumes between 2010 and 2020 of 2672.8%, 896.9%, 953.5%, 290.2%, 233.8%, 561.3%, and 531.6%, respectively, percentages far exceeding the expansion of Brazil’s agricultural area. The primary reason for this sharp increase in herbicide sales was the worsening cases of weeds resistant and tolerant to glyphosate, with species such as Conyza spp., Amaranthus spp., Digitaria insularis, and Eleusine indica standing out. This situation created the necessity of the use of additional herbicides to achieve effective chemical control of these weed species. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Sales of 2,4-D (tons of a.e.) from 2010 to 2020 (<b>A</b>). Evolution of herbicide sales in relation to the year 2010, compared to the evolution of soybean area (IBGE), the area of agriculture designated for harvesting (annual and perennial) (IBGE), and the area cultivated with pastures without degradation (LAPIG/UFG) (<b>B</b>). Number of formulated products based on 2,4-D sold in Brazil (<b>C</b>) (period from 2010 to 2020).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Sales of triclopyr (tons of a.e.) from 2010 to 2020 (<b>A</b>). Evolution of the commercialization of herbicide in relation to the year 2010, compared to the evolution of the soybean area (IBGE), the area of agriculture intended for harvest (temporary and permanent) (IBGE), and the area cultivated with pastures showing no degradation (LAPIG/UFG) (<b>B</b>). Number of formulated products based on triclopyr marketed in Brazil (<b>C</b>) (period from 2010 to 2020).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Sales of haloxyfop-methyl, clethodim, and glufosinate (tons of a.i./a.e.) (<b>A</b>). Evolution of the commercialization of herbicides in relation to the year 2010, compared to the evolution of the soybean area (IBGE) and the area of agriculture intended for harvest (temporary and permanent) (IBGE) (<b>B</b>). Sales data for haloxyfop-methyl are presented in effective ingredients.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Number of formulated products based on haloxyfop-methyl (<b>A</b>), clethodim (<b>B</b>), and glufosinate (<b>C</b>) marketed in Brazil, subdivided by products containing only the active ingredient (isolated) or pre-formulated mixtures containing the respective herbicides (period from 2010 to 2020).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Sales of diclosulam and flumioxazin (tons of a.i.) (<b>A</b>). Evolution of herbicide sales compared to the year 2010, alongside the evolution of soybean area (IBGE) and the area of agriculture designated for harvest (temporary and permanent) (IBGE) (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Number of formulated products based on diclosulam (<b>A</b>) and flumioxazin (<b>B</b>) marketed in Brazil, subdivided by products containing only the active ingredient (isolated) or pre-formulated mixtures containing the respective herbicides (period from 2010 to 2020).</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 3596 KiB  
Article
Experimental Investigation of Magnetic Drum Separation Techniques for Dodder (Cuscuta L.) Seed Removal from Alfalfa Seed Mixtures
by Petruţa Petcu, Augustina Pruteanu, Valeria Gabriela Ciobanu and Ana-Maria Nicolau
Agriculture 2024, 14(12), 2313; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122313 - 17 Dec 2024
Viewed by 253
Abstract
Thousands of species of parasitic weeds, such as dodder, pose significant threats to agricultural crops due to their ability to spread rapidly through seeds. When cultivated lands become infested with dodder, the quality of production declines, leading to substantial damage. The most effective [...] Read more.
Thousands of species of parasitic weeds, such as dodder, pose significant threats to agricultural crops due to their ability to spread rapidly through seeds. When cultivated lands become infested with dodder, the quality of production declines, leading to substantial damage. The most effective way to limit the infestation of agricultural lands by parasitic weeds, particularly dodder, is to control the quality of seeds intended for sowing. To obtain seed material free of dodder seeds, special separation machines equipped with magnetic drums are used. These machines operate on the principle of magnetic fields acting on ferromagnetic particles, which helps differentiate the physical states of the seeds intended for separation. This paper presents experimental research on magnetic drum separation techniques for removing dodder seeds from alfalfa seed mixtures. The study examines variables such as magnetic drum speed, feed rate, amounts of iron powder, water, solution (water and glycerin), and the initial content of dodder seeds. The experimental results indicated that using a water–glycerin solution at optimal concentrations for moistening the seeds enhances the separation efficiency of dodder seeds from alfalfa seed mixtures, compared to using only water. Additionally, the numerical content of dodder seeds in the A and C sorts, which primarily contain the seeds of the main crop, decreases with each pass through the machine, resulting in higher quality seed material. The research found that using appropriate parameters—drum rotation speed (20 rpm), iron powder quantity (19 g/min), and seed feed rate (25.39 g/s)—achieved a “free” classification for dodder in alfalfa seeds. These findings are valuable for evaluating the performance of separation equipment with magnetic drums to obtain high-quality seed material. They are also beneficial for designers, machine-building units, and economic agents specializing in this field. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Dodder weed (<span class="html-italic">Cuscuta</span> L.).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Dodder seeds; (<b>b</b>) fragile dodder seeds; (<b>c</b>) gray dodder seeds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Alfalfa seeds; (<b>b</b>) dodder seeds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The technological diagram of the machine used in the experiments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Front view with feeding area; (<b>b</b>) Mixer; (<b>c</b>) Screw conveyor and vibrating table; (<b>d</b>) Magnetic drum with drive and rotating brush; (<b>e</b>) Front view with magnetic drums and vibrating tables; (<b>f</b>) Side view with the machine used for experimentsCaption.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Diagram of the experimental process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Numerical content of custard apple seeds in Sort A, depending on the amounts of water and water and glycerin solution, for different amounts of iron powder.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Numerical content of custard apple seeds in Sort C, depending on the amounts of water and water and glycerin solution, for different amounts of iron powder.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 1526 KiB  
Article
Impact of Alternative Substrates on Plant Growth and Root Exudates in Plant Interactions: A Study on Secale cereale L. and Amaranthus retroflexus L.
by Elise De Snyders, Marie-Laure Fauconnier, Pauline Canelle, Judith Wirth and Aurélie Gfeller
Agronomy 2024, 14(12), 3000; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14123000 - 17 Dec 2024
Viewed by 247
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of substrate composition on root architecture, plant growth, and allelopathic secondary metabolites, specifically benzoxazinoids (BXs), in the rhizospheres of rye (Secale cereale L.) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.). Given the complexities of root exudate analysis, [...] Read more.
This study investigates the effects of substrate composition on root architecture, plant growth, and allelopathic secondary metabolites, specifically benzoxazinoids (BXs), in the rhizospheres of rye (Secale cereale L.) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.). Given the complexities of root exudate analysis, including the influence of substrate on root morphology and exudation, the experiment compared plant growth and BX release in two substrates: glass microbeads and a mixture of clay beads and attapulgite. Rye, pigweed, and co-cultures of the two were grown under controlled conditions, with root and shoot parameters measured to assess substrate suitability. Additionally, UPLC-QTOF-MS was used to analyze BXs in rye and rye–pigweed co-cultures. The results demonstrated that the clay bead and attapulgite mixture provided better growth conditions and was effective for BX extraction, making it a suitable substrate for studying allelopathy in controlled environments. The findings highlight the critical role of substrate composition in both plant development and the study of root exudates, with implications for better understanding of crop–weed interactions and allelopathy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Allelochemicals in Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Pictures of pigweed (P) and rye (R) shoots, alone and in co-culture (R + P), in two different substrates: microbeads of glass on the left (A) and clay beads and attapulgite mixture on the right (B) at day 10 after sowing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Images of scans of rye and pigweed roots in two different substrates obtained using WinRHIZO™ Basic 2021 software: microbeads of glass (<b>A</b>) and clay beads and attapulgite mixture (<b>B</b>) at day 10 after sowing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of two substrates, microbeads of glass (substrate A) and a mixture of clay and attapulgite (substrate B), for rye and pigweed cultivated alone (R or P) and in co-culture (R + P) by measuring different root parameters: root length (<b>A</b>), root surface area (<b>B</b>), root average diameter (<b>C</b>), root volume (<b>D</b>), number of tips (<b>E</b>), root length density (<b>F</b>), root surface area density (<b>G</b>), and root branching density (<b>H</b>). Graphs comparing two substrates by measuring dry root biomass (<b>I</b>), dry shoot biomass (<b>J</b>), root tissue density (<b>K</b>), and specific root length (<b>L</b>) for rye alone (R) and in co-culture (R + P). Asterisks indicate significant differences between two groups: * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of two growth modalities, alone and in co-culture, for pigweed and rye cultivated in microbeads of glass (PA or RA) and a mix of clay beads and attapulgite (PB or RB) by measuring different root parameters: root length (<b>A</b>), root surface area (<b>B</b>), root average diameter (<b>C</b>), root volume (<b>D</b>), number of tips (<b>E</b>), root length density (<b>F</b>), root surface area density (<b>G</b>), and root branching density (<b>H</b>). Graphs comparing two modalities, alone and co-culture, by measuring dry root biomass (<b>I</b>), dry shoot biomass (<b>J</b>), root tissue density (<b>K</b>), and specific root length (<b>L</b>) for rye in microbeads of glass (RA) or in the clay bead and attapulgite substrate (RB). Asterisks indicate significant differences between two groups: * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Comparison of two substrates, microbeads of glass (<b>A</b>) and mix of clay beads and attapulgite (<b>B</b>), for rye cultivated alone and rye in co-culture by measuring different BX concentrations (μg·mL<sup>−1</sup>). Values are means ± SEMs for each condition. Asterisks indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-values) between two groups: * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 3661 KiB  
Review
Does Microplastic Contamination in Agricultural Soils Decrease the Efficiency of Herbicides for Weed Control?
by Maura Gabriela da Silva Brochado, Iara Barbosa Magalhães, Júlia Martins Soares, Alessandro da Costa Lima, Laura Bordignon, Allana Grecco Guedes, Mariana Ramírez Castillo and Kassio Ferreira Mendes
Microplastics 2024, 3(4), 771-788; https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics3040048 - 17 Dec 2024
Viewed by 322
Abstract
The contamination of agricultural soils by microplastics (MPs) has significant implications for herbicide efficacy and soil health. This study investigates the effects of MPs on critical processes such as the sorption, desorption, and degradation of herbicides, highlighting their influence on these compounds’ mobility, [...] Read more.
The contamination of agricultural soils by microplastics (MPs) has significant implications for herbicide efficacy and soil health. This study investigates the effects of MPs on critical processes such as the sorption, desorption, and degradation of herbicides, highlighting their influence on these compounds’ mobility, persistence, and bioavailability. MPs interact with herbicides through sorption mechanisms, often reducing the availability of these compounds for weed control by retaining them on their surfaces. This sorption not only limits the immediate efficacy of herbicides but also alters their desorption process, resulting in a prolonged release into the soil environment. Additionally, MPs can inhibit microbial activity involved in herbicide degradation, increasing the time degradation of the half-life of these substances and extending their persistence in the environment. These processes collectively enhance the risks of bioaccumulation and environmental contamination. Understanding these interactions is essential for developing strategies to mitigate the impacts of MPs on herbicide performance and promote sustainable agricultural practices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Current Opinion in Microplastics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Contamination of arable soils by microplastics (MPs) and their interactions with the behavior and efficacy of herbicides. Source: Adapted from Zhang et al. [<a href="#B29-microplastics-03-00048" class="html-bibr">29</a>]; Nobre et al. [<a href="#B30-microplastics-03-00048" class="html-bibr">30</a>]; Wang et al. [<a href="#B31-microplastics-03-00048" class="html-bibr">31</a>]; and Ni et al. [<a href="#B26-microplastics-03-00048" class="html-bibr">26</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Annual publications on microplastics indexed in Scopus and Web of Science.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Main research areas by number of publications on microplastics (MPs) indexed in Scopus and Web of Science (WoS).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Distribution of publications on microplastics (MPs) worldwide according to the Scopus database.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Annual publications on microplastics (MPs) and herbicide interaction indexed in Scopus and Web of Science (WoS).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Soil properties affected by the presence of microplastics (MPs).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Interaction mechanisms between MPs and herbicides in soils. K<sub>ow</sub>: octanol–water partition coefficient; S<sub>w</sub>: water solubility; K<sub>d</sub>: distribution coefficient; pK<sub>a</sub>: acid dissociation constant; pK<sub>b</sub>: base dissociation constant. Source: Adapted from Wang et al. [<a href="#B23-microplastics-03-00048" class="html-bibr">23</a>].</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 1147 KiB  
Article
Effects of Aqueous Extracts of Lantana camara L. on Germination of Setaria viridis (L.) P.Beauv. Seeds with Different Degrees of Dormancy
by Marcelly Eduarda da Cunha Lázaro-dos-Santos, Nadine Tonelli Cavalari, Everson dos Santos Ribeiro, Henrique Henning Boyd da Cunha, Livia Marques Casanova, Fernanda Reinert, Bianca Ortiz-Silva and Luana Beatriz dos Santos Nascimento
Seeds 2024, 3(4), 677-688; https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds3040044 - 16 Dec 2024
Viewed by 200
Abstract
Setaria viridis (green foxtail) is an invasive weed species in various agricultural systems, prompting the search for effective compounds to control its germination. The species has primary and secondary dormancy depending on the time elapsed since post-harvesting, making management strategies more difficult. Several [...] Read more.
Setaria viridis (green foxtail) is an invasive weed species in various agricultural systems, prompting the search for effective compounds to control its germination. The species has primary and secondary dormancy depending on the time elapsed since post-harvesting, making management strategies more difficult. Several weed plants, such as Lantana camara L., can be a source of allelochemicals with herbicidal effects, being a potential candidate for the control of S. viridis. We investigated the effects of L. camara extracts on the germination and initial growth of S. viridis seeds with different degrees of dormancy and revealed a dose-dependent bioherbicide effect. Aqueous extracts of L. camara were analyzed by HPLC-DAD and applied (0.1 to 5.0 mg/mL) to 12- and 110-day post-harvest S. viridis seeds. Seeds were evaluated daily and germination percentage (GP), speed germination index (SGI), and radicle length (RL) were calculated. Phenolic acids and flavonoids were major components of the extract. Lower concentrations (0.1 and 0.5 mg/mL) stimulated and accelerated the germination of S. viridis, breaking its dormancy. Both 1.0 and 5.0 mg/mL concentrations hindered germination, especially in 12 dph seeds. The 1.0 mg/mL concentration resulted in longer roots, whereas 5.0 mg/mL inhibited root development. Lantana camara extracts potentially stimulate germination and radicle growth of S. viridis at low concentrations while inhibiting these parameters at higher doses. These results may open new possibilities for using L. camara in weed-control strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Seed Germination Ecophysiology of Invasive Species)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Effects of <span class="html-italic">L. camara</span> aqueous extracts on the germination rate of <span class="html-italic">S. viridis</span> seeds. (<b>a</b>) 12 dph seeds; (<b>b</b>) 110 dph seeds. Values are represented as means and the bars represent the standard deviation. Different letters indicate values that differ significantly at <span class="html-italic">p &lt;</span> 0.05, according to One-way ANOVA, followed by the Holm-Sidak test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Effects of <span class="html-italic">L. camara</span> aqueous extracts on germination speed index—GSI: (<b>a</b>) 12 dph seeds; (<b>b</b>) 110 dph seeds. Different letters indicate values that differ significantly at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, according to One-way ANOVA, followed by the Holm–Sidak test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effects of <span class="html-italic">L. camara</span> aqueous extract on root length. (<b>a</b>) 12 dph seeds; (<b>b</b>) 110 dph seeds. Different letters indicate values that differ significantly at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05, according to One-way ANOVA, followed by the Holm–Sidak test.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 7423 KiB  
Article
Uncovering Key Transcription Factors Driving Chilling Stress Tolerance in Rice Germination
by Vívian Ebeling Viana, Camila Pegoraro, Viviane Kopp da Luz, Antonio Costa de Oliveira and Luciano Carlos da Maia
DNA 2024, 4(4), 582-598; https://doi.org/10.3390/dna4040038 - 16 Dec 2024
Viewed by 224
Abstract
Background: Rice, one of the main foods in Brazil and the world, is sensitive to chilling (0–15 °C), especially in the germination and reproductive stages. Chilling causes delayed germination and affects coleoptile elongation at the S3 stage (needlepoint), causing poor plant establishment, stunted [...] Read more.
Background: Rice, one of the main foods in Brazil and the world, is sensitive to chilling (0–15 °C), especially in the germination and reproductive stages. Chilling causes delayed germination and affects coleoptile elongation at the S3 stage (needlepoint), causing poor plant establishment, stunted growth, and non-vigorous plants, also impacting weed management. Elucidating the mechanisms responsible for resilience under cold conditions helps the development of tolerant cultivars. Transcription factors (TFs) act in stress response signaling, making them indispensable in the tolerance mechanism. Objective: Thus, this study aimed to identify and characterize the expression profile of transcription factors in the response to chilling stress in rice at the germination stage. Methods: To determine the transcriptional profile of 2408 genes belonging to 56 TF families, RNAseq was performed on the shoot tissue of seedlings of Oro (chilling-tolerant) and Tio Taka (chilling-sensitive) genotypes grown under control conditions (25 °C) and chilling stress (13 °C) until the S3 stage. Results: Of the total genes analyzed, 22% showed significant differential expression in the analyzed cultivars. There were 117 genes that showed significant differential expression in the tolerant cultivar, 60 of which were downregulated and 57 upregulated. In the sensitive cultivar, 248 genes had a significant differential expression, of which 98 genes were downregulated and 150 genes were upregulated. A total of 170 genes encoding TFs were commonly and significantly differentially expressed in the tolerant and sensitive genotypes. Conclusions: Here, we revealed potential new targets involved in the regulation of chilling stress in rice at the S3 stage. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>RNA-seq analysis showing the transcription factor-encoding genes in shoots in the S3 stage of two rice genotypes, Oro (tolerant) and Tio Taka (sensitive), subjected to chilling stress (13 °C) during germination. (<b>A</b>) Volcano plot illustrating the upregulated and downregulated genes reaching statistical significance (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), illustrated in red and blue, respectively, and the non-significant genes, illustrated in gray, in the chilling tolerant genotype Oro subjected to chilling stress (13 °C) during germination. (<b>B</b>) Volcano plot illustrating the upregulated and downregulated genes reaching statistical significance (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), illustrated in red and blue, respectively, and the non-significant genes, illustrated in gray, in the chilling sensitive genotype Tio Taka, subjected to chilling stress (13 °C) during germination.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Differentially expressed transcription factor-encoding genes in shoots in the S3 stage exclusive from rice genotype Oro (chilling-tolerant) subjected to chilling stress (13 °C) during germination. (<b>A</b>) Heat map values in Log2FC. Genes were grouped into families, and the control (optimal temperature) condition was used as a baseline. (<b>B</b>) Interaction network of upregulated genes, obtained using the STRING database, with a minimum required interaction score of 0.400 and network edges representing evidence of an interaction. Clustering was performed using k-means, only clustered genes are shown. Network nodes represent proteins, and each node represents all the proteins produced by a single, protein-coding gene locus. Edges represent protein–protein associations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Differentially expressed transcription factor-encoding genes in shoots in the S3 stage exclusive from rice genotype Tio Taka (chilling-sensitive) subjected to chilling stress (13 °C) during germination. (<b>A</b>) Heat map values in Log2FC. Genes were grouped into families, and the control (optimal temperature) condition was used as a baseline. (<b>B</b>) Interaction network of upregulated genes, obtained using the STRING database, with a minimum required interaction score of 0.400 and network edges representing evidence of an interaction. Clustering was performed using k-means, and only clustered genes are shown. Network nodes represent proteins, and each node represents all the proteins produced by a single, protein-coding gene locus. Edges represent protein–protein associations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Differential expression of the transcription factor-encoding genes in shoots in the S3 stage, found in common in both Oro (chilling-tolerant) and Tio Taka (chilling-sensitive) rice genotypes, subjected to chilling stress (13 °C) during germination. The control (optimal temperature) condition was used as a baseline.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Summary scheme showing some potential new transcription factors involved in chilling tolerance, based on a global transcriptional profile analyzing differential expression of the transcription factor-encoding genes in shoots in the S3 stage in two rice genotypes, Oro (chilling-tolerant) and Tio Taka (chilling-sensitive), subjected to chilling stress (13 °C) during germination.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 2452 KiB  
Article
Demonstrating Agroecological Practices in Potato Production with Conservation Tillage and Pseudomonas spp., Azotobacter spp., Bacillus spp. Bacterial Inoculants—Evidence from Hungary
by Jana Marjanović, Abdulrahman Maina Zubairu, Sandor Varga, Shokhista Turdalieva, Fernanda Ramos-Diaz and Apolka Ujj
Agronomy 2024, 14(12), 2979; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14122979 - 14 Dec 2024
Viewed by 446
Abstract
This study explores agroecological practices designed to improve soil quality and crop yield in small-scale agriculture, focusing on soil inoculation with beneficial bacteria over conventional fertilizers. Conducted at the SZIA Agroecological Garden MATE in Gödöllő, Hungary, the research utilizes 12 plots to evaluate [...] Read more.
This study explores agroecological practices designed to improve soil quality and crop yield in small-scale agriculture, focusing on soil inoculation with beneficial bacteria over conventional fertilizers. Conducted at the SZIA Agroecological Garden MATE in Gödöllő, Hungary, the research utilizes 12 plots to evaluate different conservation tillage methods, including minimum and no-tillage, with and without microbial inoculation. Commenced in 2022, this study centers on potato cultivation (Solanum tuberosum L.) and includes comprehensive chemical and physical analyses of soil and harvested potatoes, alongside continuous monitoring of growth. Statistical analysis using One-way Anova in R revealed p-values predominantly above 0.05, indicating no significant differences across most parameters, though variations in soil plasticity and pH (KCl) were noted. Results suggest that substantial treatmeent differences may require a longer observation period. Notably, plots with microbial inoculation exhibited higher harvest weights and tuber sizes compared to control plots. Additionally, trends and interactions were found between weed abundance, total harvest, and plant height. The findings indicate that the benefits of integrated agroecological practices, including conservation tillage, may take time to materialize, emphasizing the necessity for extended observation. This research lays the groundwork for future studies, underscoring the importance of patience in achieving improvements in soil health and crop quality through sustainable agricultural methods. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Layout of the study area in SZIA Garden. Source: authors’ own work.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Summary of the physical properties of the potatoes with <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values. Source: authors’ own work. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &gt; 0.05—no significant differences between treatments; <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt; 0.05—significant differences between treatments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Summary of the chemical properties of the potatoes with <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values. Source: authors’ own work. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &gt; 0.05—no significant differences between treatments; <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt; 0.05—significant differences between treatments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Summary of the chemical properties of the soil with <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values, 1/3. Source: authors’ own work. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &gt; 0.05—no significant differences between treatments; <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt; 0.05—significant differences between treatments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Summary of the chemical properties of the soil with <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values, 2/3. Source: authors’ own work. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &gt; 0.05—no significant differences between treatments; <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt; 0.05—significant differences between treatments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Summary of the chemical properties of the soil with <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values, 3/3. Source: authors’ own work. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &gt; 0.05—no significant differences between treatments; <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt; 0.05—significant differences between treatments.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 1660 KiB  
Review
Agroecological Weed Management and the Potential Role of Fungi-Based Bioherbicides in Conservation: Advantages, Applications and Future Prospects
by Dimitra Petraki, Panagiotis Kanatas, Stavros Zannopoulos, Metaxia Kokkini, Nikolaos Antonopoulos, Ioannis Gazoulis and Ilias Travlos
Conservation 2024, 4(4), 847-859; https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation4040050 - 12 Dec 2024
Viewed by 397
Abstract
Recently, there has been growing interest by farmers and researchers in various agroecological approaches enhancing biodiversity and conservation including the use of natural herbicides derived from fungi to provide adequate weed control. This change is driven by growing concerns about herbicide resistance, environmental [...] Read more.
Recently, there has been growing interest by farmers and researchers in various agroecological approaches enhancing biodiversity and conservation including the use of natural herbicides derived from fungi to provide adequate weed control. This change is driven by growing concerns about herbicide resistance, environmental impacts and regulatory requirements. This review summarizes the results of various studies and highlights the efficacy and benefits of fungal bioherbicides in weed control. Fungi-based bioherbicides utilize the natural weed suppression capability of selected fungi to reduce weed density and competitiveness without completely eradicating the plants and such an approach is at the core of agroecology. Bioherbicides contribute to conservation by providing an environmentally friendly alternative to chemical herbicides. By reducing the reliance on synthetic chemicals, fungal bioherbicides help preserve soil health, water quality and protect non-target species, including beneficial organisms such as pollinators and soil microbes. They also promote biodiversity by selectively targeting specific weed species, leaving native plants and other organisms unharmed and favoring diversified weed flora without the dominance of a few species. Despite their promising potential, bioherbicides face several challenges, including delayed action, production difficulties and the potential toxicity of certain fungal toxins to mammals. This review highlights the growing adoption of fungal bioherbicides as an eco-friendly component of Integrated Weed Management (IWM). Further research is necessary to identify optimal fungal strains for controlling persistent weeds without putting at risk the overall biodiversity and to develop improved formulations for enhanced efficacy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Advantages and disadvantages of fungal bioherbicides.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Documents published annually on fungal bioherbicides, based on a literature review in the Scopus database from 2000 to 2024.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 1021 KiB  
Article
Fitness of Mythimna separata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on Cultivated Wheat and a Weed, Wild Oat (Avena fatua), and Its Implications for Pest Management
by Qinjian Pan, Junyu Shen, Lvming Su, Zexiang Nie, Ikkei Shikano, Tong-Xian Liu and Lin Chen
Biology 2024, 13(12), 1037; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13121037 - 11 Dec 2024
Viewed by 468
Abstract
Mythimna separata (Walker), a significant migratory pest in many Asian countries, can cause severe damage to wheat crops. Understanding whether wild oat can serve as an alternate host is important for informing predictive models of M. separata infestation levels in wheat fields and [...] Read more.
Mythimna separata (Walker), a significant migratory pest in many Asian countries, can cause severe damage to wheat crops. Understanding whether wild oat can serve as an alternate host is important for informing predictive models of M. separata infestation levels in wheat fields and can improve pest and weed management strategies. We first conducted both choice and no-choice experiments and found that M. separata readily laid eggs on both wheat and wild oat, with no significant oviposition preference. However, newly hatched larvae exhibited a strong preference for wheat, with 53.34% more larvae feeding on wheat compared to wild oat. Development time from egg to adult emergence was significantly shorter in M. separata fed on wheat than on wild oat, although the durations of the larval and pupal stages varied depending on the host plant. Despite these differences in development time, host plants did not significantly affect larval survival, pupal weight, fecundity, and adult longevity. The mean number of eggs laid by females that fed on wheat and wild oat were 1202.12 and 1270.54 eggs/female, and larval survival rates were 81% and 84%, respectively. Our findings suggest that wild oat can serve as a suitable host for M. separata and may act as a refuge when wheat fields are treated with insecticides. The high larval preference for wheat over wild oat indicates that M. separata on wild oat may easily disperse to wheat, complicating pest control and highlighting the need to include wild oat in pest management strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ecological Regulation of Forest and Grassland Pests)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic of the experimental method. (<b>A</b>) Oviposition preference, (<b>B</b>) feeding preference, and (<b>C</b>) development and reproduction of <span class="html-italic">Mythimna separata</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The mean number of eggs (±SE) laid by individual <span class="html-italic">Mythimna separata</span> females during a 3-day oviposition period when given a choice between wheat and wild oat. Numbers in the bars indicate sample sizes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The percentage of newly hatched <span class="html-italic">Mythimna separata</span> larvae found on wheat or wild oat leaves after 24 h in a two-choice experiment. Values are means ± SE. Asterisk represents statistically significant difference between wheat and wild oat (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Survivorship of <span class="html-italic">Mythimna separata</span> larvae, shown as Kaplan–Meier estimates over 30 days, was compared using log-rank tests to assess the survival differences between larvae fed on leaves of wheat and wild oat. In the figure, ‘ns’ indicates a non-significant difference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>A</b>) Pupal weight, (<b>B</b>) pre-oviposition period, (<b>C</b>) fecundity, and (<b>D</b>) adult longevity of <span class="html-italic">Mythimna separata</span> fed leaves of either wheat or wild oat. Values are means ± SE. Asterisks represent statistically significant differences between treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), ‘ns’ indicates a non-significant difference. Numbers in the bars indicate sample sizes.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 6147 KiB  
Article
A Seed Endophytic Bacterium Cronobacter dublinensis BC-14 Enhances the Growth and Drought Tolerance of Echinochloa crus-galli
by Sheng Cheng, Qingling Wang, Dashan Yang, Quanlong He, Jianxin Deng, Yi Zhou, Lin Zhang and Jianwei Jiang
Microorganisms 2024, 12(12), 2544; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122544 - 10 Dec 2024
Viewed by 480
Abstract
Successful seed germination and plant seedling growth often require association with endophytic bacteria. Barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv.) is a main weed during rice cultivation and has frequently been found in drought-prone fields such as cornfields in recent years. To [...] Read more.
Successful seed germination and plant seedling growth often require association with endophytic bacteria. Barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv.) is a main weed during rice cultivation and has frequently been found in drought-prone fields such as cornfields in recent years. To determine whether endophytic bacteria enhance the survival chances of barnyard grass in dryland conditions, endophytic bacteria were collected from barnyard grass seeds. An endophytic bacterial strain, BC-14, was selected and confirmed as Cronobacter dublinensis based on its morphology, physiology, biochemistry, and genomic information. Moreover, C. dublinensis BC-14 secreted IAA in the Luria–Bertani broth up to 28.44 mg/L after 5 days; it could colonize the roots of barnyard grass. After the inoculation with seeds or the well-mixed planting soil, the bacterium can significantly increase the root length and plant height of barnyard grass under drought conditions. When comparing with the control group on the 28th day, it can be seen that the bacterium can significantly increase the contents of chlorophyll b (up to 7.58 times) and proline (37.21%); improve the activities of superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase (36.90%, 51.51%, and 12.09%, respectively); and reduce the content of malondialdehyde around 25.92%, which are correlated to the drought tolerance. The bacterial genomic annotation revealed that it contains growth-promoting and drought-resistant functional genes. In a word, C. dublinensis BC-14 can help barnyard grass suppress drought stress, promote plant growth, and enhance biomass accumulation, which is helpful to interpret the mechanism of weed adaptability in dry environments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Microbe Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The effects on barnyard grass ((<b>A</b>) root length; (<b>B</b>) leaf length; (<b>C</b>) fresh weight; (<b>D</b>) dry weight; and (<b>E</b>) seed germination rate) applied with four endophytic bacteria. There are significant differences between data groups represented by different lowercase letters (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Identification of <span class="html-italic">Cronobacter dublinensis</span> BC-14. (<b>A</b>) Cultural characteristics. (<b>B</b>) Gram staining. (<b>C</b>) Heatmap of ANI analysis based on the genome sequences of 10 <span class="html-italic">Cronobacter</span> strains. (<b>D</b>) The phylogenetic tree based on single-copy ortholog gene sequences of genomes using the maximum likelihood (ML) method. Bootstrap values from 1000 replicates are shown at nodes. <span class="html-italic">Cronobacter condimenti</span> LMG 26250 was selected as the outgroup. <sup>T</sup>: type strain. Scale bar: B = 25 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>GFP-tagged <span class="html-italic">Cronobacter dublinensis</span> BC-14 localization in barnyard grass roots using confocal laser microscopic images ((<b>A</b>) white light; (<b>B</b>) fluorescence mode; and (<b>C</b>) overlay image). The white arrows represented bacteria colonizing the roots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The growth appearance (<b>A1</b>,<b>B1</b>), root length (<b>A2</b>,<b>B2</b>), and plant height (<b>A3</b>,<b>B3</b>) of barnyard grass treated with <span class="html-italic">Cronobacter dublinensis</span> BC-14 without (A: 0% PEG) and under (B: 20% PEG) drought stress conditions at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. C−: The seeds were soaked in sterile water and then sown in aseptic soil; C+: The seeds were soaked in sterile water and then sown in bacterial (BC-14) mixed soil; S−: The seeds were soaked in the bacterial inoculum (BC-14, 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/mL) and then sown in aseptic soil. ***: significant difference compared with C− and C+, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; **: significant difference compared with C− and S−, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; *: significant difference compared with C, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. The same figure below.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The variations of chlorophyll (<b>A1</b>,<b>A2</b>), chlorophyll a (<b>B1</b>,<b>B2</b>), chlorophyll b (<b>C1</b>,<b>C2</b>), proline (<b>D1</b>,<b>D2</b>), superoxide dismutase (<b>E1</b>,<b>E2</b>), malondialdehyde (<b>F1</b>,<b>F2</b>), catalase (<b>G1</b>,<b>G2</b>), and peroxidase (<b>H1</b>,<b>H2</b>) in barnyard grass at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after the treatment with <span class="html-italic">Cronobacter dublinensis</span> BC-14 without ((<b>A1</b>–<b>H1</b>): 0% PEG) and under ((<b>A2</b>–<b>H2</b>): 20% PEG) drought stress conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The whole genome sequence of <span class="html-italic">Cronobacter dublinensis</span> BC-14.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 3175 KiB  
Article
Anthracocystis panici-leucophaei: A Potential Biological Control Agent for the Grassy Weed Digitaria insularis
by Adriany Pena de Souza, Juliana Fonseca Alves, Eliane Mayumi Inokuti, Fernando Garcia, Bruno Wesley Ferreira, Thaisa Ferreira da Nobrega, Robert Weingart Barreto, Bruno Sérgio Vieira and Camila Costa Moreira
Agronomy 2024, 14(12), 2926; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14122926 - 7 Dec 2024
Viewed by 500
Abstract
Anthracocystis panici-leucophaei, causal agent of smut on Digitaria insularis (sourgrass), was evaluated as a biological control agent for this weed. Two types of inocula (teliospore and sporidia) were tested to assess its infectivity. The effects of teliospore and sporidia inoculations at different [...] Read more.
Anthracocystis panici-leucophaei, causal agent of smut on Digitaria insularis (sourgrass), was evaluated as a biological control agent for this weed. Two types of inocula (teliospore and sporidia) were tested to assess its infectivity. The effects of teliospore and sporidia inoculations at different phenological stages of sourgrass were compared, as well as the potential of sporidia and teliospores in post-emergence sourgrass management. Virulence tests were conducted with the isolates obtained from D. insularis and evaluation of specificity of A. panici-leucophaei. Both teliospores and sporidia of A. panici-leucophaei are infective to D. insularis in three different phenological stages. Newly emerged plants with one pair of leaves are more sensitive to A. panici-leucophaei. Infection by A. panici-leucophaei inhibits the growth of sourgrass, decreasing several physiological parameters of D. insularis plants. The fungus produces systematic infection of sourgrass plants and may induce the formation of sori in a significant proportion of the plant panicles, partly castrating those plants. Among sixteen A. panici-peucophaei isolates tested, isolate 46 was the most virulent and inhibited the growth of sourgrass plants, and thus appears to have good potential as a biological control agent to be deployed against sourgrass. A. panici-leucophaei was demonstrated to be specific to D. insularis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Collection sites (red triangles) [IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística 2021). Design ilustration: Xavier, L. C. M. (2023)].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Sourgrass (<span class="html-italic">Digitaria insularis</span>) showing smut symptoms (growth reduction and formation of sori) on <span class="html-italic">Anthracocystis panici-leucophaei</span> in a field situation in Monte Carmelo, Minas Gerais (Brazil).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p><span class="html-italic">Anthracocystis panici-leucophaei.</span> (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Sori on live plants (<span class="html-italic">D. insularis</span>). (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Teliospores produced on fertile hyphae forming chains while immature (SEM). (<b>e</b>) Verruculose teliospores (SEM); (<b>f</b>) Detail of teliospores production. Scale bar = 2 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Multilocus phylogenetic tree of <span class="html-italic">Anthracocystis</span> species inferred from RAxML and Bayesian analysis based on ITS sequences. The bootstraps ≥ 70 and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90 are indicated above the nodes, respectively. Isolate from the study are highlighted in bold. The tree was rooted with <span class="html-italic">Langdonia confusa</span> and <span class="html-italic">Triodiomyces triodiae</span>. The type isolate was identified as “t”, isotype as “i”, and holotype as “h” during isolates identification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p><span class="html-italic">D. insularis</span> plants 37 days after sowing. Control on the left followed by examples of plants inoculated with <span class="html-italic">Anthracocystis panici-leucophaei</span> on the right. Inoculated plants as follows: teliospores in the soil (TS1), sporidia in the soil (ES3), teliospores on 3–4 leaves plants (TA1), sporidia on 3–4 leaves plants (EA3), teliospores on newly emerged plants (TRE1), and sporidia on newly emerged plants (ERE3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Examples of impact of isolates of <span class="html-italic">A. panici-leucophaei</span> on sourgrass growth 90 days after sowing 80 days after inoculation with sporidial suspension on one pair of leaves-plants. (<b>A</b>) Sourgrass plants inoculated with isolate BSV2; (<b>B</b>) Sourgrass plants inoculated with isolate 46.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Host-specificity evaluation of <span class="html-italic">A. panici-leucophaei.</span> Treated plants appearance at 90 days if age, 60 days after inoculation. (<b>A</b>) Non-inoculated (control) wheat; (<b>B</b>) wheat plants inoculated with the smut fungus; (<b>C</b>) sorghum control; (<b>D</b>) sorghum inoculated with the smut fungus; (<b>E</b>) rice control; and (<b>F</b>) rice inoculated with <span class="html-italic">A. panici-leucophaei</span>.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 310 KiB  
Article
Silicon as a Predicator of Sustainable Nutrient Management in Maize Cultivation (Zea mays L.)
by Przemysław Kardasz, Piotr Szulc, Krzysztof Górecki, Katarzyna Ambroży-Deręgowska and Roman Wąsala
Sustainability 2024, 16(23), 10677; https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310677 - 5 Dec 2024
Viewed by 472
Abstract
Field trials were conducted at the Field Experimental Station in Winna Góra. Weed control after maize sowing increased the grain yield by 15.7% compared to that after herbicide application at the BBCH 14/15 stage. Higher effectiveness of silicon application in maize cultivation can [...] Read more.
Field trials were conducted at the Field Experimental Station in Winna Góra. Weed control after maize sowing increased the grain yield by 15.7% compared to that after herbicide application at the BBCH 14/15 stage. Higher effectiveness of silicon application in maize cultivation can be achieved on plantations free from primary or secondary weed infestation. The application of a 50% NPK dose increased the grain yield by 8.6%, while a 100% dose improved it by 13.9% compared to that of the control object (without mineral fertilization). Furthermore, it was observed that the effectiveness of the silicon increased with higher total precipitation during the maize growing season, as evidenced by the results from 2022. In that year, the difference between the control (without silicon application) and the treatment with silicon applied at the BBCH 15/16 stage was more than 33%. The average mass losses from the green tea bags ranged from 54.9% to 71.9% in the variant of the sowing experiment carried out after spraying with the herbicide and from 69.4% to 72.4% in the variant with herbicide spraying at the BBCH14 stage. The rooibos tea’s mass losses were lower, as expected, and ranged from 18.6% to 36.4% in the first variant and from 30.8% to 38.6% in the second variant. The mass losses of the green tea and rooibos tea were the highest in the variant with herbicide spraying at the BBCH14 stage and the lowest in the variant of the sowing experiment carried out after herbicide spraying. The stabilization factor (S) ranged from 193 × 10−3 to 254 × 10−3 in sowing after herbicide spraying and from 188 × 10−3 to 226 × 10−3 in the variant with herbicide spraying at the BBCH14 stage. The k (decomposition constant) ranged from 7.8 × 10−3 to 11.5 × 10−3 in the first variant and from 7.2 × 10−3 to 13.4 × 10−3 in the variant with herbicide spraying at BBCH14. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Agriculture)
12 pages, 2295 KiB  
Review
Phosphite as a Sustainable and Versatile Alternative for Biostimulation, Biocontrol, and Weed Management in Modern Agriculture
by Libia Iris Trejo-Téllez, Víctor Hugo Carbajal-Vázquez, Jazmín Lavín-Castañeda and Fernando Carlos Gómez-Merino
Processes 2024, 12(12), 2764; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12122764 - 5 Dec 2024
Viewed by 454
Abstract
Phosphite (Phi), an analog of phosphate (Pi), is an anion widely used in phytosanitary management and agricultural biostimulation schemes. Given that, unlike some species of bacteria, plants do not naturally have the mechanisms to metabolize Phi once they have absorbed it, Phi must [...] Read more.
Phosphite (Phi), an analog of phosphate (Pi), is an anion widely used in phytosanitary management and agricultural biostimulation schemes. Given that, unlike some species of bacteria, plants do not naturally have the mechanisms to metabolize Phi once they have absorbed it, Phi must be used in perfect coordination with adequate nutritional management of Pi in the crop since an excessive level of Phi combined with a deficient supply of Pi causes a disruption in ionic balances that can result in serious toxicity or even the death of the plant. In addition to the adequate Phi/Pi balance, high doses of Phi by themselves cause alterations in the mechanisms of perception and response to phosphorus deficiency leading to toxicity in plants. Hence, in various plant species, it has been proven that Phi can be used with herbicidal effects. Genes that encode enzymes involved in the metabolization of Phi have been isolated from bacterial genomes, and they have been transferred by genetic engineering to plant genomes, allowing the development of dual fertilization and weed control systems. This review provides background on the novel uses of Phi in agriculture and breaks down its potential use as an alternative herbicide in sustainable agriculture approaches supported by green chemistry. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Review Papers in Section "Environmental and Green Processes")
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Structure of the phosphate (Pi; PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup>) and phosphite (Phi; HPO<sub>3</sub><sup>2−</sup>) anions, showing the replacement of an oxygen atom (O) in Pi by a hydrogen one (H) in the tetrahedral configuration in Phi.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Mobility of phosphate (Pi) in the soil towards the roots, following the concentration gradient. Phosphate, when applied to the soil as a solid fertilizer, tends to fix, and its mobility is negatively affected. Additionally, the diffusion coefficient of Pi is low in soil. The Pi depletion zone favors its access to the root.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Mobility of phosphite (Phi) in the plant. Liquid applications of phosphite to the plant have great mobility in the conductive tissues (xylem and phloem), so its potential hormetic effects are more readily evident.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop