[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (108)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = retinal transplantation

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
27 pages, 6354 KiB  
Review
Advances in the Study of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Based on Cell or Cell-Biomaterial Scaffolds
by Ziming Li, Zhiyong Hu and Zhixian Gao
Bioengineering 2025, 12(3), 278; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12030278 (registering DOI) - 11 Mar 2025
Viewed by 90
Abstract
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a progressive neurodegenerative disorder affecting the central retina, is pathologically defined by the irreversible degeneration of photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), coupled with extracellular drusen deposition and choroidal neovascularization (CNV), and AMD constitutes the predominant etiological factor for [...] Read more.
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a progressive neurodegenerative disorder affecting the central retina, is pathologically defined by the irreversible degeneration of photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), coupled with extracellular drusen deposition and choroidal neovascularization (CNV), and AMD constitutes the predominant etiological factor for irreversible vision impairment in adults aged ≥60 years. Cell-based or cell-biomaterial scaffold-based approaches have been popular in recent years as a major research direction for AMD; monotherapy with cell-based approaches typically involves subretinal injection of progenitor-derived or stem cell-derived RPE cells to restore retinal homeostasis. Meanwhile, cell-biomaterial scaffolds delivered to the lesion site by vector transplantation have been widely developed, and the implanted cell-biomaterial scaffolds can promote the reintegration of cells at the lesion site and solve the problems of translocation and discrete cellular structure produced by cell injection. While these therapeutic strategies demonstrate preliminary efficacy, rigorous preclinical validation and clinical trials remain imperative to validate their long-term safety, functional durability, and therapeutic consistency. This review synthesizes current advancements and translational challenges in cell-based and cell-biomaterial scaffold approaches for AMD, aiming to inform future development of targeted interventions for AMD pathogenesis and management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic representation of the progress of cell-based and cell-biomaterial scaffolds for AMD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Photomicrographs of 5 μm retinal sections, captured at 3 weeks post-treatment, demonstrate the survival of implanted cells (green) at the 3-week time point (<b>A</b>–<b>E</b>). The green fluorescence indicates the presence of photoreceptor precursor cells (pRPCs), while the blue fluorescence represents Hoechst counterstaining for nuclear visualization. Additionally, images taken 24 h post-implantation (<b>F</b>) are included for comparative analysis. Reprinted from Ref. [<a href="#B68-bioengineering-12-00278" class="html-bibr">68</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Subretinal engraftment of hESC-derived RPE cells in the albino rabbit model was evaluated through longitudinal multimodal imaging and histopathological analysis. (<b>A</b>) In vivo assessment utilizing multicolor confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (cSLO) combined with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) demonstrated the structural integration of transplanted hESC-RPE cells at 1-, 4-, and 12-week postoperative intervals. The SD-OCT scan planes are demarcated by green reference lines. (<b>B</b>) Histological validation at the 4-week time point revealed successful RPE engraftment, as evidenced by bright-field microscopy and immunofluorescence staining for nuclear mitotic apparatus protein (NuMA) and bestrophin-1 (BEST-1), specific markers of RPE cellular integrity and functionality. Scale bars represent 200 μm for panel A and 50 μm for panel B. Reprinted from Ref. [<a href="#B77-bioengineering-12-00278" class="html-bibr">77</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>RPE cell transplantation in RCS rats. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) Fundus imaging (<b>A</b>) and hematoxylin and eosin (H&amp;E) staining (<b>B</b>) were performed on the eyes of RCS rats following subretinal injection of saline or retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells. The inset in (<b>A</b>) demonstrates the presence of human nuclear antigen-positive cells in the RPE-injected eye at postnatal day 90 (P90). (<b>C</b>) Assessment of visual function via optokinetic tracking revealed a significant improvement in visual acuity in RCS rats that received RPE transplantation compared to those injected with saline. (<b>D</b>) Immunohistochemical analysis of retinal sections using cone arrestin antibody was conducted to evaluate cone photoreceptor preservation following RPE transplantation. (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>) Quantitative analysis of retinal thickness (<b>E</b>) and cone photoreceptor density (<b>F</b>) was performed in RCS rats receiving low and high doses of RPE transplantation. Measurements were taken from both the nasal and temporal regions of the retina. Scale bars represent 100 μm. Reprinted from Ref. [<a href="#B83-bioengineering-12-00278" class="html-bibr">83</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>A</b>) Experimental design for the transplantation of induced retinal pigment epithelial (iRPE) cells in a sodium iodate (SI)-induced rat model of AMD. (<b>B</b>) ERG waveforms recorded at various time points post-transplantation. The calibration scale indicates 200 μV vertically and 25 ms horizontally. (<b>C</b>) Quantitative analysis of ERG b-wave amplitude (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 10). Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test. (<b>D</b>) Representative micrographs of retinal sections at 6 weeks post-transplantation. Injection sites are indicated by arrows, and the outer nuclear layer (ONL) is demarcated by yellow dashed lines. (<b>E</b>) Quantitative assessment of ONL thickness (μm) (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test. (<b>F</b>) Representative micrographs of retinal cryosections stained using the TUNEL assay to detect apoptotic cells. (<b>G</b>) Statistical analysis of the percentage of apoptotic cells within the ONL (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test. (<b>H</b>) Immunostaining of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUCMSCs) and iRPE cells at 4 weeks post-transplantation in vivo. (<b>I</b>) Quantitative analysis of the percentage of immunostaining-positive grafted cells (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 7). Statistical significance was determined using Student’s unpaired <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test. (<b>J</b>) Pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) levels secreted by hUCMSCs and iRPE cells, as measured by ELISA (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4). Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s unpaired <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test. Scale bar = 50 μm. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance is denoted as follows: ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001 compared to the PBS control group; <sup>#</sup> <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, <sup>##</sup> <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 compared to the hUCMSC group; <sup><span>$</span></sup> <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 compared to the PBS group. Adapted from Ref. [<a href="#B87-bioengineering-12-00278" class="html-bibr">87</a>].</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 1210 KiB  
Review
Future Directions in Diabetic Retinopathy Treatment: Stem Cell Therapy, Nanotechnology, and PPARα Modulation
by Maria Kąpa, Iga Koryciarz, Natalia Kustosik, Piotr Jurowski and Zofia Pniakowska
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(3), 683; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030683 - 21 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1202
Abstract
This narrative review focuses on innovative treatment approaches to diabetic retinopathy to meet the urgent demand for advancements in managing both the early and late stages of the disease. Recent studies highlight the potential of adipose stem cells and their secreted factors in [...] Read more.
This narrative review focuses on innovative treatment approaches to diabetic retinopathy to meet the urgent demand for advancements in managing both the early and late stages of the disease. Recent studies highlight the potential of adipose stem cells and their secreted factors in mitigating the retinal complications of diabetes, with promising results in improving visual acuity and reducing inflammation and angiogenesis in diabetic retinopathy. However, caution is warranted regarding the safety and long-term therapeutic effects of adipose stem cells transplantation. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells can also mitigate retinal damage in diabetic retinopathy. Studies demonstrate that bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes can suppress the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, reducing oxidative stress, inflammation, and angiogenesis in the diabetic retina, offering promise for future diabetic retinopathy treatments. Nanotechnology has the ability to precisely target the retina and minimize systemic side effects. Nanoparticles and nanocarriers offer improved bioavailability, sustained release of therapeutics, and potential for synergistic effects. They can be a new way of effective treatment and prevention of diabetic retinopathy. Activation and modulation of PPARα as a means for diabetic retinopathy treatment has been widely investigated in recent years and demonstrated promising effects in clinical trials. PPARα activation turned out to be a promising therapeutic method for treating dyslipidemia, inflammation, and insulin sensitivity. The combination of PPARα modulators with small molecules offers an interesting perspective for retinal diseases’ therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diabetic Retinopathy: Current Concepts and Future Directions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic summary of molecules used in nanotechnology in DR treatment; pt. 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic summary of molecules used in nanotechnology in DR treatment; pt. 2.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 730 KiB  
Article
Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors Affecting Clinical Outcomes in Cytomegalovirus Retinitis Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
by Qiaozhu Zeng, Yuou Yao, Jing Hou and Heng Miao
Biomedicines 2025, 13(1), 242; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13010242 - 20 Jan 2025
Viewed by 672
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and identify the prognostic factors affecting visual outcomes, retinal detachment, and recurrence in cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMVR) patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Methods: A retrospective analysis of 54 CMVR patients [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and identify the prognostic factors affecting visual outcomes, retinal detachment, and recurrence in cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMVR) patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Methods: A retrospective analysis of 54 CMVR patients (84 eyes) who underwent allo-HSCT between 2015 and 2024 was conducted. Ophthalmologic and systemic evaluations were performed. The visual outcomes were classified as improvement, stabilization, and deterioration. Logistic regression and LASSO regression models were used to identify the prognostic factors. Results: Improved or stabilized visual outcomes were found in 22 eyes, while 62 eyes suffered from deterioration. Larger lesion areas were independently associated with poorer visual outcomes (OR 0.989, p = 0.002). Eight (9.5%) eyes had rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and thirteen (15.5%) eyes suffered from recurrence. Retinal detachment was significantly predicted by higher baseline aqueous CMV DNA load (OR 5.087, p = 0.026). Macula involvement (OR 5.322, p = 0.032) and more intravitreal injections (IVs) (OR 1.263, p = 0.008) were independent risk factors for recurrence. No systemic factors were found to be associated with the clinical outcome of eyes with CMVR. Conclusions: Ocular characteristics, rather than systemic factors, were more useful to predict the clinical outcome of eyes with CMVR. Routine ophthalmic screening and early intervention are essential to improving outcomes in this vulnerable population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Translational Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Feature selection using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) binary logistic regression model for retinal detachment. (<b>A</b>) LASSO coefficient profiles of the 29 baseline features. (<b>B</b>) Tuning parameter (λ) selection in the LASSO model used 10-fold cross-validation via minimum criteria.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Feature selection using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) binary logistic regression model for recurrence. (<b>A</b>) LASSO coefficient profiles of the 29 baseline features. (<b>B</b>) Tuning parameter (λ) selection in the LASSO model used 10-fold cross-validation via minimum criteria.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 11533 KiB  
Article
Integration and Differentiation of Transplanted Human iPSC-Derived Retinal Ganglion Cell Precursors in Murine Retinas
by Qiannan Lei, Rong Zhang, Fa Yuan and Mengqing Xiang
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(23), 12947; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252312947 - 2 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1105
Abstract
Optic neuropathy such as glaucoma, stemming from retinal ganglion cell (RGC) degeneration, is a leading cause of visual impairment. Given the substantial loss of RGCs preceding clinical detection of visual impairment, cell replacement therapy emerges as a compelling treatment strategy. Human-induced pluripotent stem [...] Read more.
Optic neuropathy such as glaucoma, stemming from retinal ganglion cell (RGC) degeneration, is a leading cause of visual impairment. Given the substantial loss of RGCs preceding clinical detection of visual impairment, cell replacement therapy emerges as a compelling treatment strategy. Human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) serve as invaluable tools for exploring the developmental processes and pathological mechanisms associated with human RGCs. Utilizing a 3D stepwise differentiation protocol for retinal organoids, we successfully differentiated RGC precursors from hiPSCs harboring a BRN3B-GFP RGC reporter, verified by GFP expression. Intravitreal transplantation of enriched RGC precursors into healthy or N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-injured mice demonstrated their survival, migration, and integration into the proper retinal layer, the ganglion cell layer, after 3 weeks. Notably, these transplanted cells differentiated into marker-positive RGCs and extended neurites. Moreover, enhanced cell survival was observed with immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory treatments of the host prior to transplantation. These data underscore the potential of transplanted RGC precursors as a promising therapeutic avenue for treating degenerative retinal diseases resulting from RGC dysfunction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research in Retinal Degeneration)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Induction of retinal organoids from BRN3B-GFP hiPSCs. (<b>A</b>) Schematic illustration of the insertion of P2A-EGFP into the <span class="html-italic">BRN3B</span> locus by CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. (<b>B</b>) Confirmed DNA sequences around the insertion site of the <span class="html-italic">BRN3B</span> locus before and after gene editing. (<b>C</b>) G-band analysis of BRN3B-GFP iPSCs demonstrated a normal karyotype. The numbers of 1–22 and X, Y represent chromosome numbers. (<b>D</b>) Schematic of the retinal organoid differentiation procedure. (<b>E</b>) Microscopic images of the cell aggregates and retinal organoids derived from both WT and BRN3B-GFP hiPSCs. Optic cup-like neuroepithelia appeared by day 18 of induction, which gradually transitioned to layered retinal organoids by day 40. Scale bar: (<b>E</b>) 100 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Labeling of RGC precursors by GFP in BRN3B-GFP retinal organoids and their enrichment by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). (<b>A</b>) BRN3B-GFP retinal organoid sections from the indicated time points were double-immunostained for GFP and PAX6, HUC/D, or BRN3B, followed by DAPI counterstaining. GFP<sup>+</sup> RGC precursors were observed within the inner layer of the organoid after day 40, which co-expressed RGC protein markers HUC/D, BRN3B or PAX6. There was no GFP expression on day 27. (<b>B</b>) Sections from 60-day retinal organoids derived from wild-type (WT) and BRN3B-GFP hiPSCs were double-immunolabeled with an anti-GFP antibody and antibodies against the indicated protein markers and then counterstained with DAPI. In BRN3B-GFP retinal organoids, GFP was seen in differentiating RGCs co-expressing PAX6 or HUC/D but not in retinal progenitor cells expressing PAX6 or SOX2 or in photoreceptor precursor cells expressing OTX2. (<b>C</b>) Sections of 40-day BRN3B-GFP retinal organoids were double-immunostained with antibodies against GFP and BRN3B and counterstained with DAPI. The right panel is a magnification of the part in the dotted box. RGC precursors (GFP<sup>+</sup>BRN3B<sup>+</sup>) were seen in the inner layer. (<b>D</b>) Schematic illustrating the process of enriching GFP<sup>+</sup> precursors derived from 40-day BRN3B-GFP retinal organoids by FACS. The green dots represent GFP<sup>+</sup> cells. The image above depicts the morphology of retinal organoids with GFP fluorescence confined to the inner regions. (<b>E</b>) Cells expressing BRN3B-GFP were sorted by FACS, resulting in an enrichment of GFP-positive RGC precursors. Single cells from 40-day WT retinal organoids were utilized for control gating (upper panel). Scale bar: (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>) 40 μm; (<b>B</b>) 20 μm; (<b>D</b>) 200 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Evaluation of retinal damage post intravitreal injection of different dosages of NMDA. (<b>A</b>) TUNEL analysis of mouse retinal cryosections was performed 24 h post NMDA injection. Cells labeled with tetramethylrhodamine-deoxyuridine triphosphate (TMR dUTP, red) indicate DNA fragmentation, which signifies apoptosis. “Untreated” denotes the control group, “PBS” represents PBS injection, while 25 nmol, 50 nmol, 100 nmol, and 200 nmol refer to NMDA injection doses. The retinal layers are labeled as follows: ONL (outer nuclear layer), OPL (outer plexiform layer), INL (inner nuclear layer), IPL (inner plexiform layer), and GCL (ganglion cell layer). (<b>B</b>) Histogram showing the number of TUNEL-positive apoptotic cells in the retina post-intravitreal injection of varying doses of NMDA. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3 or 4). Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test: ns, not significant; * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001; ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001. (<b>C</b>) Representative images of RBPMS-positive RGCs in the central, middle, and peripheral regions of the retina 7 days after intravitreal injection of the indicated doses of NMDA. (<b>D</b>) Quantification of RBPMS<sup>+</sup> RGCs in each indicated group in the central, middle, and peripheral regions of the retina. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test: * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001; ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001. Scale bar: (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>) 20 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Transplantation of RGC precursors from the BRN3B-GFP retinal organoids into the mouse retina. The green dots represent GFP<sup>+</sup> cells. (<b>A</b>) Timeline of NMDA injection and RGC precursor transplantation. (<b>B</b>) Transplanted whole-mount retinas from wild-type (WT) and NMDA-injured mice were double-immunostained with antibodies against GFP and RBPMS and counterstained with DAPI. Arrows point to the transplanted cells co-expressing GFP and RBPMS, and the arrowhead indicates a GFP-positive neurite. Scale bar: (<b>B</b>) 20 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Transplantation of RGC precursors into the retinas of mice administered immunosuppressants. (<b>A</b>) Timeline of NMDA injection, immunosuppressant administration, and RGC precursor transplantation. The green dots represent GFP<sup>+</sup> cells. (<b>B</b>,<b>C</b>) Transplanted whole-mount retinas from wild-type (WT) and NMDA-injured mice were double-immunostained with antibodies against GFP and RBPMS and counterstained with DAPI. The small arrows point to the transplanted cells co-expressing GFP and RBPMS, and the arrowheads indicate GFP-positive neurites/nerve bundles. The big arrow in (<b>B</b>) points to the centripetal direction. The inset in (<b>C</b>) shows a corresponding outlined region at a higher magnification to visualize an axon segment with varicosities. The lower panels in (<b>C</b>) are higher-magnification views of the outlined area 1 in (<b>B</b>). (<b>D</b>) Higher magnification views of the outlined area 2 in (<b>B</b>) show cells immunoreactive for GFP, HuNu, or both, with DAPI counterstaining. Arrows point to the transplanted cells co-expressing GFP and HuNu. (<b>E</b>) Quantification of RBPMS<sup>+</sup> RGCs derived from transplanted GFP<sup>+</sup> precursor cells in each indicated group. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3–4). Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test: ns, not significant; * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.01. Scale bar: (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) 20 μm; (<b>B</b>) 40 μm.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 814 KiB  
Review
From Gut to Eye: Exploring the Role of Microbiome Imbalance in Ocular Diseases
by Andreea-Talida Tîrziu, Monica Susan, Razvan Susan, Tanasescu Sonia, Octavia Oana Harich, Adelina Tudora, Norberth-Istvan Varga, Dragomir Tiberiu-Liviu, Cecilia Roberta Avram, Casiana Boru, Mihnea Munteanu and Florin George Horhat
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(18), 5611; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185611 - 21 Sep 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2837
Abstract
Background: The gut microbiome plays a crucial role in human health, and recent research has highlighted its potential impact on ocular health through the gut–eye axis. Dysbiosis, or an imbalance in the gut microbiota, has been implicated in various ocular diseases. Methods: A [...] Read more.
Background: The gut microbiome plays a crucial role in human health, and recent research has highlighted its potential impact on ocular health through the gut–eye axis. Dysbiosis, or an imbalance in the gut microbiota, has been implicated in various ocular diseases. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using relevant keywords in major electronic databases, prioritizing recent peer-reviewed articles published in English. Results: The gut microbiota influences ocular health through immune modulation, maintenance of the blood–retinal barrier, and production of beneficial metabolites. Dysbiosis can disrupt these mechanisms, contributing to ocular inflammation, tissue damage, and disease progression in conditions such as uveitis, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, dry eye disease, and glaucoma. Therapeutic modulation of the gut microbiome through probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation shows promise in preclinical and preliminary human studies. Conclusions: The gut–eye axis represents a dynamic and complex interplay between the gut microbiome and ocular health. Targeting the gut microbiome through innovative therapeutic strategies holds potential for improving the prevention and management of various ocular diseases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Ocular Manifestations of Systemic Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study selection process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Gut dysbiosis and related ocular diseases. Figure created with Adobe Illustrator 2024 and iStock.</p>
Full article ">
34 pages, 3672 KiB  
Review
Mitochondria in Retinal Ganglion Cells: Unraveling the Metabolic Nexus and Oxidative Stress
by Tsai-Hsuan Yang, Eugene Yu-Chuan Kang, Pei-Hsuan Lin, Benjamin Ben-Chi Yu, Jason Hung-Hsuan Wang, Vincent Chen and Nan-Kai Wang
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(16), 8626; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168626 - 7 Aug 2024
Viewed by 2493
Abstract
This review explored the role of mitochondria in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), which are essential for visual processing. Mitochondrial dysfunction is a key factor in the pathogenesis of various vision-related disorders, including glaucoma, hereditary optic neuropathy, and age-related macular degeneration. This review highlighted [...] Read more.
This review explored the role of mitochondria in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), which are essential for visual processing. Mitochondrial dysfunction is a key factor in the pathogenesis of various vision-related disorders, including glaucoma, hereditary optic neuropathy, and age-related macular degeneration. This review highlighted the critical role of mitochondria in RGCs, which provide metabolic support, regulate cellular health, and respond to cellular stress while also producing reactive oxygen species (ROS) that can damage cellular components. Maintaining mitochondrial function is essential for meeting RGCs’ high metabolic demands and ensuring redox homeostasis, which is crucial for their proper function and visual health. Oxidative stress, exacerbated by factors like elevated intraocular pressure and environmental factors, contributes to diseases such as glaucoma and age-related vision loss by triggering cellular damage pathways. Strategies targeting mitochondrial function or bolstering antioxidant defenses include mitochondrial-based therapies, gene therapies, and mitochondrial transplantation. These advances can offer potential strategies for addressing mitochondrial dysfunction in the retina, with implications that extend beyond ocular diseases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Retinal Degeneration—from Genetics to Therapy: Second Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The Cytoarchitecture of Retinal Ganglion Cells Contributing to High Metabolic Demands. IPL, inner plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer; NFL, nerve fiber layer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Representative section of a retina from a mito:mKate2 mouse (JAX #032188). This image displays mitochondria expressing far-red fluorescence due to the mKate2 protein, which is fused to the N-terminal of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit VIII, targeting it specifically toward mitochondria (shown in red). Nuclei are labeled with DAPI staining (blue). RGC: retinal ganglion cell; IPL: inner plexiform layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer; IS: inner segment; OS: outer segment. RPE: retinal pigment epithelium.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The Genetic and Molecular Pathways of Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Hereditary Optic Neuropathies. OMM, outer mitochondrial membrane. IMM, inner mitochondrial membrane; TCA, tricarboxylic acid cycle; NADH, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; FADH<sub>2</sub>, flavin adenine dinucleotide; ATP: adenosine triphosphate; OPA, optic atrophy; CMT, Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease; LHON, Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy; mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA; OMA1, M-AAA protease; MICOS, mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Metabolism and Antioxidant Defense Pathway. ROS are represented by maroon text boxes, whereas antioxidants are presented in turquoise text boxes. O<sub>2</sub>: molecular oxygen; O<sub>2</sub><sup>•−</sup>: superoxide anion radicals; H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>: hydrogen peroxide; HO<sup>•</sup>: hydroxyl radicals; HOCl: hypochlorous acid; H<sub>2</sub>O: hydrogen oxide, water; ROOH: organic hydroperoxide; MDA: malondialdehyde; 4-HNE: 4-hydroxynonenal; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acid; NOS: nitric oxide synthase; NO<sup>•</sup>: nitric oxide; ONOO<sup>−</sup>: peroxynitrite; SOD: superoxide dismutase; G6PD: glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase; GSH: glutathione; GSSH: oxidized glutathione; NADPH: nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; TRX: thioredoxin.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 10966 KiB  
Article
Amelioration of Photoreceptor Degeneration by Intravitreal Transplantation of Retinal Progenitor Cells in Rats
by Jing Yang, Geoffrey P. Lewis, Chin-Hui Hsiang, Steven Menges, Gabriel Luna, William Cho, Nikolay Turovets, Steven K. Fisher and Henry Klassen
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(15), 8060; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25158060 - 24 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1272
Abstract
Photoreceptor degeneration is a major cause of untreatable blindness worldwide and has recently been targeted by emerging technologies, including cell- and gene-based therapies. Cell types of neural lineage have shown promise for replacing either photoreceptors or retinal pigment epithelial cells following delivery to [...] Read more.
Photoreceptor degeneration is a major cause of untreatable blindness worldwide and has recently been targeted by emerging technologies, including cell- and gene-based therapies. Cell types of neural lineage have shown promise for replacing either photoreceptors or retinal pigment epithelial cells following delivery to the subretinal space, while cells of bone marrow lineage have been tested for retinal trophic effects following delivery to the vitreous cavity. Here we explore an alternate approach in which cells from the immature neural retinal are delivered to the vitreous cavity with the goal of providing trophic support for degenerating photoreceptors. Rat and human retinal progenitor cells were transplanted to the vitreous of rats with a well-studied photoreceptor dystrophy, resulting in substantial anatomical preservation and functional rescue of vision. This work provides scientific proof-of-principle for a novel therapeutic approach to photoreceptor degeneration that is currently being evaluated in clinical trials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research in Human Stem Cells)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Allogeneic RPCs ameliorate degeneration in RCS rats: donor cells and host function. (<b>A</b>–<b>E</b>) Rat-derived RPCs labeled for E1A reporter gene (red) (<b>A</b>), nestin (<b>B</b>), sox2 (<b>C</b>), Ki-67 (<b>D</b>), and vimentin (<b>E</b>) (DAPI = blue). (<b>F</b>) Relative expression by rRPCs of selected genes of interest, including cytokines, as compared to allogeneic fibroblasts. (<b>G</b>,<b>H</b>) Functional performance of rRPC- versus sham- and untreated eyes in dark-eyed dystrophic RCS recipients as assessed via optomotor (<b>G</b>) and ERG (<b>H</b>) testing (cell = rRPC, sham = saline, UT = untreated, * = <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** = <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Allogeneic RPCs ameliorate degeneration in RCS rats: host anatomy. Assessment of photoreceptor cell loss via relative attenuation of the outer nuclear layer (ONL), comparing untreated (<b>A</b>), sham- (<b>B</b>), and rRPC-treated (<b>C</b>) retinas at 3 months of age. Note: the residual ONL is thin compared to the adjacent INL and indicated with lettering (ONL) as well as arrows (black); * = subretinal debris zone. Relative integrity of the outer plexiform layer (OPL) of non-dystrophic wildtype rats (<b>D</b>,<b>G</b>) as compared to sham- (<b>E</b>,<b>H</b>) and rRPC-treated (<b>F</b>,<b>I</b>) dystrophic RCS rats, assessed at an earlier time point (P35) and therefore prior to substantial degeneration of the ONL (bright white nuclei). Synaptophysin (green) and CtbP2 (red) label structures within the OPL, while cone sheaths are labeled with peanut agglutinin (blue), DAPI (white). (<b>G</b>–<b>I</b>) Cropped versions of above images (<b>D</b>–<b>F</b>) with only synaptophysin (green) and CtbP2 (red) labeling to better visualize differences in OPL preservation between conditions. Scale bar = 50 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Characteristics of human RPCs in culture. (<b>A</b>–<b>G</b>) Grown as an adherent monolayer and viewed in phase contrast (<b>A</b>); labeled for Nestin (<b>B</b>), Vimentin (<b>C</b>), Sox2 (<b>D</b>), Ki-67 (<b>E</b>), SSEA-1/CD-15 (<b>F</b>), and GD<sub>2</sub> ganglioside (<b>G</b>); counter-labeled with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 100 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Characteristics of human RPCs: in vitro analysis. (<b>A</b>) Expression by hRPCs of selected genes of interest, as compared to syngeneic fibroblasts and an allogeneic retinoblastoma cell line. (<b>B</b>) Principal component analysis of the global transcriptome obtained via microarray shows clustering of replicate samples and separation among hRPCs, human fibroblasts (FBs), retinoblastoma cells (RBs), and fetal retinal tissue. (<b>C</b>) Flow cytometric analysis comparing expression of MHC class I (vertical axis) versus class II (horizontal) in upper right scatter plot and co-expression of nestin (vertical) and sox2 (horizontal) in lower right scatter plot, with appropriate isotype controls in upper left and lower left plots, respectively. (<b>D</b>) Differentiation of hRPCs via growth factor withdrawal (blue bars) induces expression of glial-associated markers CRALBP and GFAP, as well as neuronal markers MAP2 and Recoverin, within the cultured population, versus undifferentiated controls (green bars). (<b>E</b>–<b>G</b>) Cultured hRPCs have a normal 46, XX karyotype without chromosomal abnormalities (<b>E</b>), as confirmed by FISH (<b>F</b>), and are negative for telomerase activity, as are syngeneic fibroblasts but not retinoblastoma cells (<b>G</b>). (<b>H</b>–<b>K</b>) Analysis of human RPCs across cell manufacturing lots. Comparison of gene expression levels of 5 different lots (GMP1–5) manufactured for clinical use, using qPCR (<b>H</b>–<b>J</b>). Also tested were syngeneic human fibroblasts (FB) and a retinoblastoma line (RB). (<b>K</b>) Cells from one of the lots (GMP5) were differentiated via growth factor withdrawal (noGF) and evaluated for changes in expression of the markers MAP2 and GFAP relative to undifferentiated controls (SM). Scale bars = 50 µm; * = <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Characteristics of human RPCs: in vitro analysis. (<b>A</b>) Expression by hRPCs of selected genes of interest, as compared to syngeneic fibroblasts and an allogeneic retinoblastoma cell line. (<b>B</b>) Principal component analysis of the global transcriptome obtained via microarray shows clustering of replicate samples and separation among hRPCs, human fibroblasts (FBs), retinoblastoma cells (RBs), and fetal retinal tissue. (<b>C</b>) Flow cytometric analysis comparing expression of MHC class I (vertical axis) versus class II (horizontal) in upper right scatter plot and co-expression of nestin (vertical) and sox2 (horizontal) in lower right scatter plot, with appropriate isotype controls in upper left and lower left plots, respectively. (<b>D</b>) Differentiation of hRPCs via growth factor withdrawal (blue bars) induces expression of glial-associated markers CRALBP and GFAP, as well as neuronal markers MAP2 and Recoverin, within the cultured population, versus undifferentiated controls (green bars). (<b>E</b>–<b>G</b>) Cultured hRPCs have a normal 46, XX karyotype without chromosomal abnormalities (<b>E</b>), as confirmed by FISH (<b>F</b>), and are negative for telomerase activity, as are syngeneic fibroblasts but not retinoblastoma cells (<b>G</b>). (<b>H</b>–<b>K</b>) Analysis of human RPCs across cell manufacturing lots. Comparison of gene expression levels of 5 different lots (GMP1–5) manufactured for clinical use, using qPCR (<b>H</b>–<b>J</b>). Also tested were syngeneic human fibroblasts (FB) and a retinoblastoma line (RB). (<b>K</b>) Cells from one of the lots (GMP5) were differentiated via growth factor withdrawal (noGF) and evaluated for changes in expression of the markers MAP2 and GFAP relative to undifferentiated controls (SM). Scale bars = 50 µm; * = <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Transplanted hRPCs ameliorate retinal degeneration in RCS rats. (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>) Section of rat eye showing human donor cells (red) clustering post injection to form aggregates in the posterior vitreous cavity (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>), with occasional adhesion to inner retinal surface but absence of intraretinal hRPC migration. An alternate location for transplanted cells was the posterior lens capsule (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>). Donor cells were labeled for Ki-67 (red, arrows) (<b>B</b>), Nestin (<b>D</b>), Vimentin (<b>C</b>), DCX (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>), GFAP (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>), NeuN (<b>C</b>), and Recoverin (<b>D</b>). (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>) Wholemounts viewed en face at photoreceptor level using confocal microscopy and computer-generated montages showing rhodopsin (red) and middle wavelength cone opsin (green) expressing profiles in hRPC- (<b>E</b>) and untreated (<b>F</b>) eyes. Scale bar = 50 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>A</b>) Analysis of ONL cell counts from retinal cross-sections of hRPC- and sham-treated retinas. (<b>B</b>) Optomotor responses (cycles per degree) comparing sensitivity of hRPC-treated eyes to sham- and untreated (UT) controls. (<b>C</b>–<b>E</b>) ERG responses in hRPC-treated eyes (45k cell dose) compared to sham- and untreated controls across three in-life time points (P45, P60, P90). * = <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Expression of cytokines and modulation of retinal cell types by RPCs. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) Relative expression of selected cytokines by cultured hRPCs, measured by qPCR, as compared to retinoblastoma cells (RB) and fibroblasts (FB). (<b>C</b>–<b>E</b>) Co-expression of candidate cytokines bFGF (<b>C</b>), PTN (<b>D</b>), and OPN (<b>E</b>) within an intravitreal hRPC graft (at P32) and co-expression of bFGF (<b>F</b>) and MANF (<b>G</b>) by another hRPC graft (at P28), assessed using immunohistochemistry. (<b>H</b>) Expression pattern of Nestin, GFAP, and DCX within an intravitreal hRPC graft at a later time point (P90). (<b>I</b>,<b>J</b>) Relative expression of bFGF in sham- (<b>I</b>) and rRPC-treated dystrophic RCS retinas (P90), showing relative labeling within the region of rod outer segments (red), located above the nuclei (bright white, DAPI) of the ONL (arrows). (<b>K</b>,<b>L</b>) Relative expression of Connexin 43 in sham- (<b>K</b>) and rRPC-treated (<b>L</b>) dystrophic RCS eyes (P35), seen as fine punctate labeling in the region of the RPE layer (arrows). Scale bar = 50 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Glial activation patterns in intravitreal RPC-treated dystrophic RCS retinas (at P90). (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) Retinal wholemounts: GFAP (green), Isolectin B4 (blue), Neurofilament (red) in untreated (<b>A</b>) and hRPC-treated (<b>B</b>) eyes. (<b>C</b>,<b>I</b>) Retinal cross-sections: GFAP (red), DAPI (white) in sham- (<b>C</b>) and rRPC-treated eyes (<b>D</b>). Glutamine synthetase (GS, green), GFAP (red), and DAPI (white) in sham- (<b>E</b>) and <b>r</b>RPC-treated eyes (<b>F</b>,<b>G</b>). GS labeling better visualized without DAPI (<b>G</b>). Caspase 3 (red), cytochrome oxidase (COX, green), and DAPI (white) labeling in sham- (<b>H</b>) and rRPC-treated (<b>I</b>) eyes. Scale bar = 50 µm.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 326 KiB  
Review
Exploring Stem-Cell-Based Therapies for Retinal Regeneration
by Madalina Radu, Daniel Constantin Brănișteanu, Ruxandra Angela Pirvulescu, Otilia Maria Dumitrescu, Mihai Alexandru Ionescu and Mihail Zemba
Life 2024, 14(6), 668; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14060668 - 23 May 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3869
Abstract
The escalating prevalence of retinal diseases—notably, age-related macular degeneration and hereditary retinal disorders—poses an intimidating challenge to ophthalmic medicine, often culminating in irreversible vision loss. Current treatments are limited and often fail to address the underlying loss of retinal cells. This paper explores [...] Read more.
The escalating prevalence of retinal diseases—notably, age-related macular degeneration and hereditary retinal disorders—poses an intimidating challenge to ophthalmic medicine, often culminating in irreversible vision loss. Current treatments are limited and often fail to address the underlying loss of retinal cells. This paper explores the potential of stem-cell-based therapies as a promising avenue for retinal regeneration. We review the latest advancements in stem cell technology, focusing on embryonic stem cells (ESCs), pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and their ability to differentiate into retinal cell types. We discuss the challenges in stem cell transplantation, such as immune rejection, integration into the host retina, and functional recovery. Previous and ongoing clinical trials are examined to highlight the therapeutic efficacy and safety of these novel treatments. Additionally, we address the ethical considerations and regulatory frameworks governing stem cell research. Our analysis suggests that while stem-cell-based therapies offer a groundbreaking approach to treating retinal diseases, further research is needed to ensure long-term safety and to optimize therapeutic outcomes. This review summarizes the clinical evidence of stem cell therapy and current limitations in utilizing stem cells for retinal degeneration, such as age-related macular degeneration, retinitis pigmentosa, and Stargardt’s disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Retinal Diseases: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutics)
14 pages, 6301 KiB  
Article
The Fate of RPE Cells Following hESC-RPE Patch Transplantation in Haemorrhagic Wet AMD: Pigmentation, Extension of Pigmentation, Thickness of Transplant, Assessment for Proliferation and Visual Function—A 5 Year-Follow Up
by Lyndon da Cruz, Taha Soomro, Odysseas Georgiadis, Britta Nommiste, Mandeep S. Sagoo and Peter Coffey
Diagnostics 2024, 14(10), 1005; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14101005 - 13 May 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1990
Abstract
(1) Background: We reviewed a stem cell-derived therapeutic strategy for advanced neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) using a human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium (hESC-RPE) monolayer delivered on a coated, synthetic basement membrane (BM)—the patch—and assessed the presence and distribution of hESC-RPE [...] Read more.
(1) Background: We reviewed a stem cell-derived therapeutic strategy for advanced neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) using a human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium (hESC-RPE) monolayer delivered on a coated, synthetic basement membrane (BM)—the patch—and assessed the presence and distribution of hESC-RPE over 5 years following transplantation, as well as functional outcomes. (2) Methods: Two subjects with acute vision loss due to sub-macular haemorrhage in advanced nAMD received the hESC-RPE patch. Systematic immunosuppression was used peri-operatively followed by local depot immunosuppression. The subjects were monitored for five years with observation of RPE patch pigmentation, extension beyond the patch boundary into surrounding retina, thickness of hESC-RPE and synthetic BM and review for migration and proliferation of hESC-RPE. Visual function was also assessed. (3) Results: The two study participants showed clear RPE characteristics of the patch, preservation of some retinal ultrastructure with signs of remodelling, fibrosis and thinning on optical coherence tomography over the 5-year period. For both participants, there was evidence of pigment extension beyond the patch continuing until 12 months post-operatively, which stabilised and was preserved until 5 years post-operatively. Measurement of hESC-RPE and BM thickness over time for both cases were consistent with predefined histological measurements of these two layers. There was no evidence of distant RPE migration or proliferation in either case beyond the monolayer. Sustained visual acuity improvement was apparent for 2 years in both subjects, with one subject maintaining the improvement for 5 years. Both subjects demonstrated initial improvement in fixation and microperimetry compared to baseline, at year 1, although only one maintained this at 4 years post-intervention. (4) Conclusions: hESC-RPE patches show evidence of continued pigmentation, with extension, to cover bare host basement membrane for up to 5 years post-implantation. There is evidence that this represents functional RPE on the patch and at the patch border where host RPE is absent. The measurements for thickness of hESC-RPE and BM suggest persistence of both layers at 5 years. No safety concerns were raised for the hypothetical risk of RPE migration, proliferation or tumour formation. Visual function also showed sustained improvement for 2 years in one subject and 5 years in the other subject. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Diagnostic Techniques in Retinal Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Changes in the pigmentation of the patch with time points and extension of pigment into the surrounding retinal area of subject 1. (<b>A1</b>–<b>A4</b>) Colour fundus photographs from (<b>A1</b>) month 1, (<b>A2</b>) month 12, (<b>A3</b>) year 2 and (<b>A4</b>) year 5 post-hESC-RPE patch implantation. The green sold line demonstrates the maximum extension of pigmentation outside the patch’s edges, which was reached at 12 months, this has been overlaid over all times points to highlight the progression and regression of RPE extension. The dotted lighter green line represents the extension of pigmentation at 1 month (<b>A1</b>). The dotted darker green line demonstrates areas of retraction of the extension of the RPE at year 5 (<b>A4</b>). The blue lines demonstrate the retraction of the darker (nasal) segment of the over-the-patch retina, deemed to be an area where host RPE overlay the implanted hESC-RPE (mentioned in text as ‘merged RPE’). Different shades of blue represent different time points for the borderline of this segment: the lighter shades correspond to earlier times and darker shades to later times (<b>B1</b>,<b>B2</b>), whilst the end stage of retraction of nasal patch RPE is represented by a solid dark blue outline. Near infrared photo and SD-OCT b-scan from the 2nd post-operative week of subject 1, showing the optimal positioning of the hESC-RPE on the synthetic BM patch (<b>B2</b> left half) and highlighting the abnormal thickness of the ‘merged’ (host + implanted) RPE (<b>B2</b> right half). Good retinal segmentation is demonstrated throughout the treated area (<b>B2</b>). (<b>C1</b>,<b>C2</b>) Near infrared and SD-OCT b-scan at 5 years post-operatively showing the outward extension of the implanted hESC-RPE. Higher magnification of the annotated parts (red dotted squares) highlighting the b-scan ‘cutting’ through a retinal area that includes sequentially a part of the patch, a part of the extended RPE (yellow line in <b>B1</b>) and a part of the host tissue. The RPE extension appears as a continuous outer hyper-reflective line starting at the hESC RPE (Patch-RPE) highlighted by yellow arrows and entering the adjacent host tissue as an extension of patch RPE (Ext. RPE), before stopping at areas of preserved host RPE (Host). Retinal segmentation appears well preserved over the patch.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Changes in the pigmentation of the patch with time points and extension of pigment into the surrounding retinal area of subject 2. (<b>A1</b>–<b>A4</b>) Colour fundus photographs from (<b>A1</b>) month 1, (<b>A2</b>) month 12, (<b>A3</b>) year 2 and (<b>A4</b>) year 5 post-hESC-RPE patch implantation. The green sold line demonstrates the maximum extension of pigmentation outside the patch’s edges, which was reached at 12 months; this has been overlaid over all times points to highlight the progression and regression of RPE extension. The dotted lighter green line represents the extension of pigmentation at 1 month (<b>A1</b>). (<b>B1</b>,<b>B2</b>) Near infrared photo and SD-OCT b-scan from the 5-year post-operative period of subject 2, showing the stable position of the hESC-RPE-artificial BM implant, as well as a detachment of a segment of the hESC-RPE from the BM, at the inferior-nasal corner of the patch (<b>B1</b> * and § for colour and near infrared pictures, respectively), appearing as PED in the b-scan (<b>B2</b>). Retinal segmentation is preserved in the nasal half of the treated area. (<b>C1</b>,<b>C2</b>) Near infrared and SD-OCT b-scan at 4 years post-operatively, showing the outward extension of the implanted hESC-RPE. Higher magnification of the annotated parts (red dotted squares) highlighting the b-scan ‘cutting’ through a retinal area that includes sequentially a part of the patch, a part of the extended RPE (yellow dotted line in <b>C1</b>) and a part of the host tissue. The RPE extension appears as a continuous outer hyper-reflective line starting at the hESC patch RPE (Patch-RPE) highlighted by yellow arrows and entering the adjacent host tissue as an extension of patch RPE (Ext. RPE), before stopping at areas of preserved host RPE (Host). Retinal segmentation appears well preserved over the patch.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>SD-OCT series of subject 1. Near infrared photos at the left part indicate the plane of the b-scan at the right. For subject 1, scans from the same retinal location (<b>A1</b>–<b>A4</b>) have been exported using the follow-up option of the Heyex software (Heidelberg-Spectralis). (<b>A1</b>) SD-OCT from 3-month post-op showing the hESC-RPE and artificial basement membrane bilayer (yellow pointer). Five measurements were taken where the hESC-RPE-BM transplant was uniform in appearance. These were repeated to have 2 measurements per 5 points pre-defined by the yellow arrows. This was done for all further scans (<b>A2</b>–<b>A4</b>). There is evidence of a nasal epiretinal membrane (ERM) that progressed over time. There is also the development of intraretinal cysts. (<b>A2</b>) SD-OCT at year 1 post-op showing ongoing ERM and intraretinal cysts. (<b>A3</b>) SD-OCT scans from post-op year 2 showing stabilisation of the retinal thickness over the bulk of the patch and increasing cystic changes in the nasal part of the treated retina. (<b>A4</b>) SD-OCT at year 5 post-op, with evidence of RPE thickening progression over the 5 years, highlighted by the blue arrow. The magnified view of the macula (<b>A4</b> *) shows apparent hESC-RPE with artificial BM, which corresponds to the histological structure of the hESC-RPE highlighted by the white arrow (<b>A4</b> §) which has a thickness of 15 microns [<a href="#B18-diagnostics-14-01005" class="html-bibr">18</a>], and the artificial BM highlighted by the black arrow which has a thickness of 10 microns [<a href="#B5-diagnostics-14-01005" class="html-bibr">5</a>] (<b>A4</b> §), with a combined depth of 25 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>SD-OCT series of subject 2. Near infrared photos at the left part indicate the plane of the b-scan at the right. For subject 2, scans from the same retinal location (<b>A1</b>–<b>A4</b>) have been exported using the follow-up option of the Heyex software (Heidelberg-Spectralis). (<b>A1</b>) SD-OCT from 3 months post-transplantation of hESC RPE-BM transplant, which is highlighted by the yellow pointer. Five measurements were taken where the hESC-RPE-BM transplant was uniform in appearance. These were repeated to have 2 measurements per 5 points pre-defined by the yellow arrows. This was done for all further scans (<b>A2</b>–<b>A4</b>). There is a temporal detachment of hESC-RPE from the artificial BM as previously described. There is development of intraretinal cysts. (<b>A2</b>) SD-OCT scans from post-op year 1, showing stabilisation of the retinal thickness over the bulk of the patch, with some thickening later cystic changes in the nasal part of the treated retina at year 2 (<b>A3</b>). (<b>A4</b>) SD-OCT scan through the whole patch from post-op year 5 with persistent epiretinal fibrosis as highlighted by the blue arrow. The magnified view of the macula (<b>A4</b> *) shows apparent hESC-RPE with artificial BM, which corresponds to the histological structure of the hESC-RPE highlighted by the white arrow (<b>A4</b> §) which has a thickness of 15 microns [<a href="#B18-diagnostics-14-01005" class="html-bibr">18</a>], and the artificial BM highlighted by the black arrow which has a thickness of 10 microns [<a href="#B5-diagnostics-14-01005" class="html-bibr">5</a>] (<b>A4</b> §), with a combined depth of 25 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Fixation and microperimetry examinations using the Nidek MP-1 microperimeter for subjects 1 and 2 (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>). Colour fundus photos have an overlay of the microperimetry grid with numerical retinal sensitivity (dB) measured at each loci. The cross represents the centre of fixation with the cloud of blue dots statistically identifying the retinal area involved in fixating the target. At baseline, there is limited retinal sensitivity over the macula for either study eye. The blue dotted lined for subject 1 at baseline (<b>A</b>, Baseline) represents a pre-operative approximation of the retina treated with the hESC-RPE patch. This was not possible for subject 2 due to the large submacular haemorrhage and poor view on the colour fundus photos. Timepoints for subjects 1 and 2 are from baseline, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months for subject 1 and 48 months for subject 2.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 6733 KiB  
Article
The Effects of the Coating and Aging of Biodegradable Polylactic Acid Membranes on In Vitro Primary Human Retinal Pigment Epithelium Cells
by Georgina Faura, Hana Studenovska, David Sekac, Zdenka Ellederova, Goran Petrovski and Lars Eide
Biomedicines 2024, 12(5), 966; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12050966 - 26 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1702
Abstract
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most frequent cause of blindness in developed countries. The replacement of dysfunctional human retinal pigment epithelium (hRPE) cells by the transplantation of in vitro-cultivated hRPE cells to the affected area emerges as a feasible strategy for regenerative [...] Read more.
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most frequent cause of blindness in developed countries. The replacement of dysfunctional human retinal pigment epithelium (hRPE) cells by the transplantation of in vitro-cultivated hRPE cells to the affected area emerges as a feasible strategy for regenerative therapy. Synthetic biomimetic membranes arise as powerful hRPE cell carriers, but as biodegradability is a requirement, it also poses a challenge due to its limited durability. hRPE cells exhibit several characteristics that putatively respond to the type of membrane carrier, and they can be used as biomarkers to evaluate and further optimize such membranes. Here, we analyze the pigmentation, transepithelial resistance, genome integrity, and maturation markers of hRPE cells plated on commercial polycarbonate (PC) versus in-house electrospun polylactide-based (PLA) membranes, both enabling separate apical/basolateral compartments. Our results show that PLA is superior to PC-based membranes for the cultivation of hRPEs, and the BEST1/RPE65 maturation markers emerge as the best biomarkers for addressing the quality of hRPE cultivated in vitro. The stability of the cultures was observed to be affected by PLA aging, which is an effect that could be partially palliated by the coating of the PLA membranes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Advanced Functional Materials for Regenerative Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>An overview of the experimental design and methods used during this work. (<b>A</b>) hRPE cells are isolated from fresh eyes. (<b>B</b>) Isolated calls are seeded in regular well plates and typically kept for 2–4 weeks. (<b>C</b>) hRPE cells are seeded on diverse types of inserts for comparison. (<b>D</b>) For 21 days, the <span class="html-italic">TEER</span> values and pictures are taken periodically. On day 21, the cells are collected, and diverse aliquots are used to perform nDNA damage, mtDNA damage, and gene expression tests.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Representative light microscopy images of (<b>A</b>) passage 0 hRPE cells on a commercial PC 12-well plate and the same cells seeded at the same cell area density on (<b>B</b>) commercial PC, (<b>C</b>) uncoated electrospun PLA membranes, and (<b>D</b>) coated electrospun PLA membranes after 21 days of culture. Representative images of the membranes without cells are shown in <a href="#app1-biomedicines-12-00966" class="html-app">Supplementary Figure S1</a> for comparison. Red scale bar: 300 µm. PC: polycarbonate; PLA: polylactide; MG: Matrigel coated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The quantification of pigmentation on the different membranes for the cultivation of hRPE cells. (<b>A</b>) A scatter plot showing the relative pigmented surface (RPS) in the images captured for several hRPE cultures on diverse supports specified accordingly. The lines represent the general trend of the data per supporting membrane (Black: Polycarbonate; Blue: Uncoated PLA; Red: Matrigel-coated PLA). (<b>B</b>) The mean RPS of the cultures on diverse supporting membranes (PC: polycarbonate; PLA: polylactide). Error bars: confidence interval (95% confidence). *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p><span class="html-italic">TEER</span> values of hRPE cell cultured on commercial inserts (black, 9 ≤ <span class="html-italic">n</span> ≤ 22 donors), uncoated PLA (blue dots/line, 2 ≤ <span class="html-italic">n</span> ≤ 4 donors), and coated PLA (red dots/line, 2 ≤ <span class="html-italic">n</span> ≤ 4 donors). Lines represent general trend of data per supporting membrane (Black: Polycarbonate; Blue: Uncoated PLA; Red: Matrigel-coated PLA). PC: polycarbonate, PLA: polylactic acid.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Cell detachment properties of cultivated hRPE cells on different supporting membranes. (<b>A</b>) hRPE cell cultures on PLA membranes being well attached (left) and with detaching extracellular matrix (right). (<b>B</b>) Representation of amount of PLA membranes showing detachment (merged from 8 different donors in 4 independent experiments).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Relative expression of hRPE markers in cultivated hRPSs on different supporting membranes; BEST1 and RPE65 in hRPE cultivated on uncoated and coated PLA membranes in comparison to commercial polycarbonate inserts. Expression of monitored genes in commercial PC inserts was set to 1. Data are shown as ratios. PC: polycarbonate, UC: uncoated PLA membranes, MG: Matrical-coated PLA membranes; 3 donors; error: SEM, * <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.01.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Genome integrity of hRPE cells plated on uncoated versus coated PLA. After 21 days in culture, hRPE cells were collected and genomic DNA was isolated. Cellular mtDNA copy number (<b>A</b>) and mtDNA damage and nDNA damage (<b>B</b>) in hRPE plated on different membranes were analyzed by qPCR-based methods; 3 donors; error: SEM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Expression of target genes in hRPE plated on newly synthesized (&lt;1 month) PLA membranes versus 21-month-old uncoated (UC) PLA membranes. Relative gene expressions of <span class="html-italic">BEST1</span>, <span class="html-italic">RPE65</span>, <span class="html-italic">PAX6</span>, <span class="html-italic">ZO-1</span>, and <span class="html-italic">SOX9</span> were determined by RT-qPCR using <span class="html-italic">GAPDH</span> as internal control; 2 donors; error: SEM.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 2108 KiB  
Review
Towards Precision Ophthalmology: The Role of 3D Printing and Bioprinting in Oculoplastic Surgery, Retinal, Corneal, and Glaucoma Treatment
by Kevin Y. Wu, Adrian Tabari, Éric Mazerolle and Simon D. Tran
Biomimetics 2024, 9(3), 145; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9030145 - 27 Feb 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4051
Abstract
In the forefront of ophthalmic innovation, biomimetic 3D printing and bioprinting technologies are redefining patient-specific therapeutic strategies. This critical review systematically evaluates their application spectrum, spanning oculoplastic reconstruction, retinal tissue engineering, corneal transplantation, and targeted glaucoma treatments. It highlights the intricacies of these [...] Read more.
In the forefront of ophthalmic innovation, biomimetic 3D printing and bioprinting technologies are redefining patient-specific therapeutic strategies. This critical review systematically evaluates their application spectrum, spanning oculoplastic reconstruction, retinal tissue engineering, corneal transplantation, and targeted glaucoma treatments. It highlights the intricacies of these technologies, including the fundamental principles, advanced materials, and bioinks that facilitate the replication of ocular tissue architecture. The synthesis of primary studies from 2014 to 2023 provides a rigorous analysis of their evolution and current clinical implications. This review is unique in its holistic approach, juxtaposing the scientific underpinnings with clinical realities, thereby delineating the advantages over conventional modalities, and identifying translational barriers. It elucidates persistent knowledge deficits and outlines future research directions. It ultimately accentuates the imperative for multidisciplinary collaboration to enhance the clinical integration of these biotechnologies, culminating in a paradigm shift towards individualized ophthalmic care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomimicry and 3D Printing of Living Materials: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Structure and Composition of Retinal Layers (BioRender, <a href="https://app.biorender.com/" target="_blank">https://app.biorender.com/</a>, accessed on 26 January 2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Bioprinting Technologies Used in Retinal and Corneal Applications.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Structure of Corneal Layers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Categorization of various keratoplasty procedures.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 4542 KiB  
Article
Beneficial Effect of Sirolimus-Pretreated Mesenchymal Stem Cell Implantation on Diabetic Retinopathy in Rats
by Nanyoung Kang, Ji Seung Jung, Jiyi Hwang, Sang-Eun Park, Myeongjee Kwon, Haerin Yoon, Jungyeon Yong, Heung-Myong Woo and Kyung-Mee Park
Biomedicines 2024, 12(2), 383; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12020383 - 7 Feb 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1629
Abstract
Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a vision-threatening complication that affects virtually all diabetic patients. Various treatments have been attempted, but they have many side effects and limitations. Alternatively, stem cell therapy is being actively researched, but it faces challenges due to a low [...] Read more.
Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a vision-threatening complication that affects virtually all diabetic patients. Various treatments have been attempted, but they have many side effects and limitations. Alternatively, stem cell therapy is being actively researched, but it faces challenges due to a low cell survival rate. In this study, stem cells were pretreated with sirolimus, which is known to promote cell differentiation and enhance the survival rate. Additionally, the subconjunctival route was employed to reduce complications following intravitreal injections. Methods: Diabetes mellitus was induced by intraperitoneal injection of 55 mg/kg of streptozotocin (STZ), and DR was confirmed at 10 weeks after DM induction through electroretinogram (ERG). The rats were divided into four groups: intact control group (INT), diabetic retinopathy group (DR), DR group with subconjunctival MSC injection (DR-MSC), and DR group with subconjunctival sirolimus-pretreated MSC injection (DR-MSC-S). The effects of transplantation were evaluated using ERG and histological examinations. Results: The ERG results showed that the DR-MSC-S group did not significantly differ from the INT in b-wave amplitude and exhibited significantly higher values than the DR-MSC and DR groups (p < 0.01). The flicker amplitude results showed that the DR-MSC and DR-MSC-S groups had significantly higher values than the DR group (p < 0.01). Histological examination revealed that the retinal layers were thinner in the DR-induced groups compared to the INT group, with the DR-MSC-S group showing the thickest retinal layers among them. Conclusions: Subconjunctival injection of sirolimus-pretreated MSCs can enhance retinal function and mitigate histological changes in the STZ-induced DR rat model. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research and Recent Advances in Diabetic Retinopathy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Changes in BW and BG over time. (<b>A</b>) A graph for BW changes over time (<b>B</b>) A graph for BG changes over time; subconjunctival administration was conducted at 11 and 12 weeks post-diabetes induction. There were no significant differences in BW and BG among the DR, DR-MSC, and DR-MSC-S groups at week 17. The INT group exhibited significantly higher BW and lower BG at all time points. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, INT, n = 8 rats; DR, n = 7 rats; DR-MSC, n = 4 rats; DR-MSC-S, n = 6 rats. Abbreviations: BW, body weight; BG, blood glucose; INT, intact control group; DR, diabetic retinopathy group; DR-MSC, DR group with subconjunctival MSC injection; DR-MSC-S, DR group with subconjunctival sirolimus-pretreated MSC injection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comparison of electroretinogram results between intact and diabetic groups at week 10 post-diabetes induction. (<b>A</b>) Results of flash b-wave amplitude and (<b>B</b>) Results of flicker amplitude at 10 weeks post-diabetes induction; the diabetic group showed significantly lower values compared to the intact group, indicating the induction of diabetic retinopathy. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, Intact, n = 8 rats, 16 eyes; Diabetic, n = 17 rats, 34 eyes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparative analysis of flicker and flash b-wave amplitudes in ERG across groups. (<b>A</b>) Flicker stimulus ERG results at 14 weeks post-diabetes induction; the DR-MSC and DR-MSC-S groups exhibited significantly greater amplitude than the DR group. (<b>B</b>) Flash stimulus ERG results at 14 weeks post-diabetes induction; the DR-MSC-S group showed significantly greater amplitude than both the DR and DR-MSC groups and did not differ statistically from the INT group. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01. INT, n = 8 rats, 16 eyes; DR, n = 7 rats, 14 eyes; DR-MSC, n = 4 rats, 8 eyes; DR-MSC-S, n = 6 rats, 12 eyes. Abbreviations: ERG, electroretinogram; INT, intact control group; DR, diabetic retinopathy group; DR-MSC, DR group with subconjunctival MSC injection; DR-MSC-S, DR group with subconjunctival sirolimus-pretreated MSC injection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Comparative analysis of flicker and flash b-wave amplitudes in ERG across groups. (<b>A</b>) Flicker stimulus ERG results at 14 weeks post-diabetes induction; the DR-MSC and DR-MSC-S groups exhibited significantly greater amplitude than the DR group. (<b>B</b>) Flash stimulus ERG results at 14 weeks post-diabetes induction; the DR-MSC-S group showed significantly greater amplitude than both the DR and DR-MSC groups and did not differ statistically from the INT group. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01. INT, n = 8 rats, 16 eyes; DR, n = 7 rats, 14 eyes; DR-MSC, n = 4 rats, 8 eyes; DR-MSC-S, n = 6 rats, 12 eyes. Abbreviations: ERG, electroretinogram; INT, intact control group; DR, diabetic retinopathy group; DR-MSC, DR group with subconjunctival MSC injection; DR-MSC-S, DR group with subconjunctival sirolimus-pretreated MSC injection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of histological evaluations of retina using H&amp;E staining. (<b>A</b>) Total retinal layer of each group 7 weeks after the initial subconjunctival injections, which was 18 weeks post-diabetes induction (<b>B</b>) Results of total retinal thickness measuring; the DR-MSC-S had a significantly thicker retina compared to DR and DR-MSC groups. (<b>C</b>) Results of INL (yellow arrow) thickness measuring. The DR had the thinnest inner nuclear layer that showed significant difference with INT and DR-MSC-S. There were no statistical differences between INT, DR-MSC, and DR-MSC-S. (<b>D</b>) Results of PRL (white arrow) thickness measuring. The DR had the thinnest PRL that showed significant difference with INT and DR-MSC-S. There were no statistical differences between INT, DR-MSC, and DR-MSC-S. H&amp;E staining, magnification ×200. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01. INT, n = 8 rats, 16 eyes; DR, n = 7 rats, 14 eyes; DR-MSC, n = 4 rats, 8 eyes; DR-MSC-S, n = 6 rats, 12 eyes. Abbreviations: H&amp;E, hematoxylin and eosin; NFL, nerve fiber layer; RGC, retinal ganglion cell layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; ONL, outer nuclear layer; PRL, photoreceptor layer; INT, intact control group; DR, diabetic retinopathy group; DR-MSC, DR group with subconjunctival MSC injection; DR-MSC-S, DR group with subconjunctival sirolimus-pretreated MSC injection.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 295 KiB  
Review
Retinitis Pigmentosa: From Pathomolecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Strategies
by Enzo Maria Vingolo, Simona Mascolo, Filippo Miccichè and Gregorio Manco
Medicina 2024, 60(1), 189; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60010189 - 22 Jan 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4571
Abstract
Retinitis pigmentosa is an inherited disease, in which mutations in different types of genes lead to the death of photoreceptors and the loss of visual function. Although retinitis pigmentosa is the most common type of inherited retinal dystrophy, a clear line of therapy [...] Read more.
Retinitis pigmentosa is an inherited disease, in which mutations in different types of genes lead to the death of photoreceptors and the loss of visual function. Although retinitis pigmentosa is the most common type of inherited retinal dystrophy, a clear line of therapy has not yet been defined. In this review, we will focus on the therapeutic aspect and attempt to define the advantages and disadvantages of the protocols of different therapies. The role of some therapies, such as antioxidant agents or gene therapy, has been established for years now. Many clinical trials on different genes and mutations causing RP have been conducted, and the approval of voretigene nepavorec by the FDA has been an important step forward. Nonetheless, even if gene therapy is the most promising type of treatment for these patients, other innovative strategies, such as stem cell transplantation or hyperbaric oxygen therapy, have been shown to be safe and improve visual quality during clinical trials. The treatment of this disease remains a challenge, to which we hope to find a solution as soon as possible. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ophthalmology)
38 pages, 2180 KiB  
Review
Beyond Vision: An Overview of Regenerative Medicine and Its Current Applications in Ophthalmological Care
by Francisco J. Santa Cruz-Pavlovich, Andres J. Bolaños-Chang, Ximena I. Del Rio-Murillo, Guillermo A. Aranda-Preciado, Esmeralda M. Razura-Ruiz, Arturo Santos and Jose Navarro-Partida
Cells 2024, 13(2), 179; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13020179 - 17 Jan 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3910
Abstract
Regenerative medicine (RM) has emerged as a promising and revolutionary solution to address a range of unmet needs in healthcare, including ophthalmology. Moreover, RM takes advantage of the body’s innate ability to repair and replace pathologically affected tissues. On the other hand, despite [...] Read more.
Regenerative medicine (RM) has emerged as a promising and revolutionary solution to address a range of unmet needs in healthcare, including ophthalmology. Moreover, RM takes advantage of the body’s innate ability to repair and replace pathologically affected tissues. On the other hand, despite its immense promise, RM faces challenges such as ethical concerns, host-related immune responses, and the need for additional scientific validation, among others. The primary aim of this review is to present a high-level overview of current strategies in the domain of RM (cell therapy, exosomes, scaffolds, in vivo reprogramming, organoids, and interspecies chimerism), centering around the field of ophthalmology. A search conducted on clinicaltrials.gov unveiled a total of at least 209 interventional trials related to RM within the ophthalmological field. Among these trials, there were numerous early-phase studies, including phase I, I/II, II, II/III, and III trials. Many of these studies demonstrate potential in addressing previously challenging and degenerative eye conditions, spanning from posterior segment pathologies like Age-related Macular Degeneration and Retinitis Pigmentosa to anterior structure diseases such as Dry Eye Disease and Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency. Notably, these therapeutic approaches offer tailored solutions specific to the underlying causes of each pathology, thus allowing for the hopeful possibility of bringing forth a treatment for ocular diseases that previously seemed incurable and significantly enhancing patients’ quality of life. As advancements in research and technology continue to unfold, future objectives should focus on ensuring the safety and prolonged viability of transplanted cells, devising efficient delivery techniques, etc. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gene and Cell Therapy in Regenerative Medicine—Second Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Stem cell classification based on origin and used administration routes of cellular therapies in ophthalmology. A broad representation of the most important stem cell sources is shown. (<b>A</b>) Fetal stem cells can be derived from fetal and extra-fetal sources. (<b>B</b>) Embryonic stem cells are pluripotent in nature and are obtained from the inner cell mass of the blastocyst. (<b>C</b>) Adult-derived stem cells can be obtained from several sources. The most important include bone marrow and adipose tissue. From bone marrow, hematopoietic stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells can be isolated. From adipose tissue, mesenchymal stem cells can also be found. Moreover, somatic adult cells can readily be induced into induced pluripotent stem cells, which as embryonic stem cells can give rise to all types of cells. As will be commented in the next section, cellular therapies have been applied in ophthalmology via several routes, including stromal, subconjunctival, intravitreal, subretinal, suprachoroidal, peribulbar, perilimbal, transconjunctival, subtenon, and lacrimal gland routes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Exosome-based therapies. Exosomes are derived by secretion of intraluminal bodies (ILV) after the fusion of multivesicular bodies (MVB) with the plasmatic membrane. MVBs are derived from the maturation of early endosomes to late endosomes, which form several membrane invaginations that encapsulate the exosomes’ contents and give rise to the ILVs. Exosomes’ cargo includes several proteins, aminoacids, nucleic acids, and lipids that are received by the recipient cell after binding to surface proteins, which causes direct fusion of the exosome with the plasmatic membrane or its endocytosis. As will be mentioned in the following section, exosomes have been applied topically in clinical trials; nonetheless, there are high expectations for the use of exosomes intravitreally for the treatment of several retinal conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Scaffold-based therapies. Scaffolds can be synthetized from natural and synthetic polymers to form hydrogels, sponges, films, or fibers. Scaffolds can later hold both cellular (e.g., stem cells) and acellular (e.g., growth factors) cargo. After transplantation, scaffolds provide cells with an appropriate microenvironment for growth, improving the grafts’ persistence and efficacy. As will be commented in the next section, scaffolds have been used in different ophthalmology clinical trials and have been administered via stromal, perilimbal, and subretinal routes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Gene therapy. The mechanisms by which this therapy functions are demonstrated in a photoreceptor. Integrating and non-integrating virus vectors can be used for gene delivery to the target cells. Lentiviruses (LV) are integrating RNA viruses that employ retrotranscription to generate their DNA, which is later integrated into the hosts’ genome for posterior mRNA transcription. Adeno-associated viruses (AAV) are single-stranded DNA viruses that do not integrate into the hosts’ genome, and after second strand synthesis, mRNA transcription is started. After transcription, mRNA is translated into the intended therapeutic protein. As commented in the next section, gene therapy has been used in ophthalmology for the treatment of different posterior segment diseases and has been applied via intravitreal and subretinal routes.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 1737 KiB  
Review
Hereditary Optic Neuropathies: A Systematic Review on the Interplay between Biomaterials and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
by Miguel Ladero, Jose Alberto Reche-Sainz and M. Esther Gallardo
Bioengineering 2024, 11(1), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11010052 - 3 Jan 2024
Viewed by 2506
Abstract
Hereditary optic neuropathies (HONs) such as dominant optic atrophy (DOA) and Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (LHON) are mitochondrial diseases characterized by a degenerative loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and are a cause of blindness worldwide. To date, there are only limited disease-modifying [...] Read more.
Hereditary optic neuropathies (HONs) such as dominant optic atrophy (DOA) and Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (LHON) are mitochondrial diseases characterized by a degenerative loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and are a cause of blindness worldwide. To date, there are only limited disease-modifying treatments for these disorders. The discovery of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology has opened several promising opportunities in the field of HON research and the search for therapeutic approaches. This systematic review is focused on the two most frequent HONs (LHON and DOA) and on the recent studies related to the application of human iPSC technology in combination with biomaterials technology for their potential use in the development of RGC replacement therapies with the final aim of the improvement or even the restoration of the vision of HON patients. To this purpose, the combination of natural and synthetic biomaterials modified with peptides, neurotrophic factors, and other low- to medium-molecular weight compounds, mimicking the ocular extracellular matrices, with human iPSC or iPSC-derived cell retinal progenitors holds enormous potential to be exploited in the near future for the generation of transplantable RGC populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biopolymers and Nano-Objects Applications in Bioengineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Annual publication trends in the three bibliographic databases consulted. Results for the three general combinations of keywords: (<b>A</b>) “Retinal Ganglion Cell AND Hereditary Optic Neuropathy”, (<b>B</b>) “Retinal Ganglion Cell AND Stem Cell”, and (<b>C</b>) “Retinal Ganglion Cell AND Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>A</b>) Retinal ganglion cell. (<b>B</b>) Crossed (red) and uncrossed (blue) fibers in the anterior visual pathway. (<b>C</b>) Fundus photograph showing excavated optic nerve heads of a right (RE) and left eye (LE) with temporal pallor in a DOA patient.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Applications of iPSC technology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Biomaterials for stem cell expansion, differentiation, and transplantation and the in vivo engrafting of stem cells including types and their most relevant features. Biomaterials are ordered from higher to lower physicochemical complexity and higher to lower biocompatibility.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop