[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (205)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = rock massif

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
31 pages, 55875 KiB  
Article
Ranked Mappable Criteria for Magmatic Units: Systematization of the Ossa-Morena Zone Rift-Related Alkaline Bodies
by José Roseiro, Noel Moreira, Daniel de Oliveira, Marcelo Silva, Luis Eguiluz and Pedro Nogueira
Minerals 2025, 15(2), 174; https://doi.org/10.3390/min15020174 - 13 Feb 2025
Abstract
The Ossa-Morena Zone (SW Iberian Massif) hosts the largest set of Cambro–Ordovician alkaline magmatic plutons related to the Palaeozoic rifting of the northern Gondwana margin so far described. An organized framework for their classification at different scales is proposed through data-driven ranks based [...] Read more.
The Ossa-Morena Zone (SW Iberian Massif) hosts the largest set of Cambro–Ordovician alkaline magmatic plutons related to the Palaeozoic rifting of the northern Gondwana margin so far described. An organized framework for their classification at different scales is proposed through data-driven ranks based on their distinctive petrological features relative to other rift-related magmatic rocks found throughout western Europe. The classification method aims to enhance geological mapping at different scales, regional- and continental-scale correlations, and, as such, facilitate the petrogenetic interpretation of this magmatism. The hierarchical scheme, from highest to lowest rank, is as follows: rank-1 (supersuite) assembles rocks that have distinctive characteristics from other magmatic units emplaced in the same magmatic event; rank-2 (suite) categorizes the units based on their major textural features, indicating if the body is plutonic, sub-volcanic, or a strongly deformed magmatic-derived unit; rank-3 (subsuite) clusters according to their spatial arrangement (magmatic centres) or association to larger structures (e.g., shear zones or alignments); rank-4, the fundamental mapping unit, characterizes the lithotype (alkaline granite, alkaline gabbro, syenite, albitite, etc.) by considering higher ranks (alkalinity and textural aspects); rank-5 characterizes the geometry of individual plutons (with several intrusions) or swarms; rank-6 (smallest mappable unit) corresponds to each intrusion or individual body from a swarm. Although this classification scheme is currently presented solely for the Ossa-Morena Zone, the scheme can be easily extended to incorporate other co-magmatic alkaline bodies, such as those in the NW Iberian allochthonous units or other peri-Gondwanan zones or massifs, in order to facilitate regional correlations of the rift-related magmatism. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Location of the Ossa-Morena Zone (OMZ) within the tectono-stratigraphic zonation of the Iberian Massif (adapted from [<a href="#B22-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B23-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">23</a>]). (<b>b</b>) Major structural domains of the OMZ, adapted from [<a href="#B24-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B25-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">25</a>], separated by the major shear zones from [<a href="#B24-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B26-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">27</a>]. The grey area corresponds to the sinistral Tomar–Badajoz–Córdoba Shear Zone [<a href="#B28-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">28</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Location and geological map of the Portuguese side of the study area, including the Alter do Chão–Elvas domain and a segment of the central unit/Tomar–Badajoz–Córdoba Shear Zone, adapted from [<a href="#B115-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">115</a>,<a href="#B116-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">116</a>,<a href="#B117-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">117</a>,<a href="#B118-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">118</a>,<a href="#B119-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">119</a>,<a href="#B120-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">120</a>,<a href="#B121-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">121</a>]. References regarding ages are found throughout the text.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Location and geological map of the Spanish side of the area with rift-related alkaline magmatic bodies, with segments of the Elvas–Cumbres Mayores, Sierra Albarrana, and Zafra–Alanís domains, as well as part of the central unit/Tomar–Badajoz–Córdoba Shear Zone (Central Unit). Adapted from [<a href="#B122-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">122</a>]. References regarding ages are found throughout the text.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Classification systems for stratigraphic, morphogenetic, and mixed-class units, partially adapted from BRUCS [<a href="#B2-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">2</a>], with only some examples of rank 5 and rank 6 classifications. the terms in bold are used at a larger scale (&gt;1:50,000). Mixed class units include more than one genetic type and have lower ranks. Ranks 5 and 6 can be used for detailed mapping (&lt;1:50,000) and to characterize individual massifs or swarms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic representation of the mappable morphological types and designation of groups with spatially associated bodies. (<b>a</b>) Circular or ovoidal simple pluton; (<b>b</b>) ring-intrusion, a unit comprising more than one related intrusion, with an inner body bounded by a ring-shaped distinct body; (<b>c</b>) sheet-intrusion, represented by a tabular plutonic body with two long parallel borders much larger than the lateral dimensions; (<b>d</b>) dyke (<b>left</b>) and sill (<b>right</b>), correspondently near vertical or near horizontal tabular volcanic bodies; (<b>e</b>) lensoidal body of orthogneiss (lens); (<b>f</b>) composite unit, embodied by two or more lithotypes (also referred to as ‘parcel’ if the tectono-metamorphic units are contiguous at outcrop); (<b>g</b>) swarm, a group of two or more related dispersed units; and (<b>h</b>) train, a group of two or more units in a linear disposition. Schemes were made following definitions for unit terms in the hierarchy of morphogenetic units, from [<a href="#B2-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">2</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Ranked classification scheme for the alkaline magmatic bodies of the Ossa-Morena Zone, with the 6 ranks adapted and following the recommendations from [<a href="#B2-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">2</a>,<a href="#B4-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">4</a>,<a href="#B10-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">10</a>], with locations of the suites and the clusters over the maps from <a href="#minerals-15-00174-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a> and <a href="#minerals-15-00174-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Regional lithological map of the elongated Alter do Chão cluster (rank 3 unit), partially adapted from [<a href="#B149-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">149</a>]. The southwestern body of Vaiamonte (separated by a stripe of rocks from the Carbonate Fm) is the Santo António limb. (<b>b</b>) Detailed geological map of the major different units of the Alter Pedroso composite pluton (rank 5 unit), with the two distinct syenite intrusions (rank 6 units).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Representative textural aspects of rocks from the Alter do Chão Cluster. Rocks from the intrusions of the Alter Pedroso pluton: (<b>a</b>) Leucocratic syenite. (<b>b</b>) Mesocratic aegirine-bearing syenite (“lusitanite” [<a href="#B146-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">146</a>]). (<b>c</b>) Pematoid syenite with riebeckite megacrystals. (<b>d</b>) A pegmatoid rock solely composed of riebeckite (“pedrosite” [<a href="#B115-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">115</a>]). Sheared intrusions from the Vaiamonte sheet-complex: (<b>e</b>) strongly foliated mesocratic syenite and (<b>f</b>) weakly foliated leucocratic syenite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Regional lithological map of the Elvas Centre (rank 3 unit, adapted from [<a href="#B119-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">119</a>,<a href="#B149-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">149</a>]), with the tabular and sub-circular/ovoidal plutonic alkaline bodies distributed asymmetrically in a central point and stretched following a NW-SE trend. The large fault separating Varche and Falcato intrusions corresponds to the Messejana fault (mentioned in the text). (<b>b</b>) Detailed geological map of the concentric zonation of the Gebarela ring intrusion (a slightly similar zonation has previously been proposed in [<a href="#B137-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">137</a>]). In this region, the pluton swarms and the ring intrusion are classified at rank 5, while the individual plutons and each unit from the Gebarela body are rank 6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Macroscopic features of rocks from the Elvas Centre: (<b>a</b>) Hedembergite-bearing granitoid from Alcamins, (<b>b</b>) Mesocratic syenite from Varche, (<b>c</b>) Mesocratic syenite from Falcato, (<b>d</b>) Albitite from the inner Gebarela core, (<b>e</b>) Mesocratic syenite from the Gebarela ring intrusion, (<b>f</b>) Perthosite from the Degola-folded pluton.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>) Regional lithological map of the Monesterio cluster (rank 3), adapted from [<a href="#B122-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">122</a>,<a href="#B155-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">155</a>,<a href="#B156-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">156</a>,<a href="#B157-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">157</a>,<a href="#B158-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">158</a>]. (<b>b</b>) Detailed map of the Almendral composite pluton, comprising syenite/quartzsyenite and granite intrusions, from [<a href="#B159-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">159</a>]. (<b>c</b>) The Barcarrota ring complex, composed of syenites and quartz syenites and alkaline granite ring intrusions, around the central mafic body [<a href="#B160-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">160</a>,<a href="#B161-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">161</a>]. (<b>d</b>) Zonation of the Castillo composite pluton, with subalkaline granites to the southeast, the main alkaline granite body, and the orthogneiss northwest rim, from [<a href="#B162-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">162</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Macroscopic aspects of the rocks from the Monesterio cluster: (<b>a</b>) albitite from the Jerez de los Caballeros swarm. (<b>b</b>) Leucocratic quartz syenites and (<b>c</b>) gabbro–diorite rocks from the Barcarrota ring complex. (<b>d</b>) Hastingsite-bearing granite from the Castillo pluton.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Lithological map of the Feria cluster, showing the Feria albitites and the Sierra Vieja hypabyssal syenite body, from [<a href="#B142-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">142</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Rocks from the Sub-Volcanic Suite: (<b>a</b>) macroscopic features of the Feria and (<b>b</b>) the Sierra Vieja rocks. Rocks from the Pero Lobo pluton: (<b>c</b>) sheared microgranite from the southwestern intrusion and (<b>d</b>) quartz syenite from the northwestern intrusion.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>(<b>a</b>) Geological map of the region of the rank 5 Monte Safueiro trachytic/microsyenite dyke swarm and the Pero Lobo body (São Romão Cluster, Sub-volcanic Suite), intruding the Miaolingian succession, adapted from [<a href="#B119-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">119</a>,<a href="#B120-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">120</a>]. (<b>b</b>) Lithological map of the Pero Lobo petrographic zoning (alkali microgranite and quartz syenite). Each individual “unnamed” dyke from the Monte Safueiro swarm and intrusion type from the Pero Lobo body is a rank 6 unit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Localization of the bodies from the Mylonite Suite within the Central Unit in (<b>a</b>) the Portuguese segment and (<b>b</b>) the Spanish segment. Lithological maps of different alkaline orthogneisses: (<b>c</b>) the lens of Assumar and (<b>d</b>) lens from the Arronches–Fialha swarm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Distinct fabrics from the lensoidal body characteristics of the Mylonite Suite: (<b>a</b>) hastingsite-bearing granitic gneiss, (<b>b</b>) nepheline-syenite gneiss from the Arronches–Fialha swarm (Fialha area), (<b>c</b>) Riebeckite- and aegirine-bearing syenite gneiss from Cevadais (“cevadaisite” [<a href="#B115-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">115</a>,<a href="#B171-minerals-15-00174" class="html-bibr">171</a>]), (<b>d</b>) Almendralejo hastingsite-bearing syenite gneiss, (<b>e</b>) granitic gneiss from Ribera del Fresno, and (<b>f</b>) granitic gneiss from Las Minillas.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 10360 KiB  
Article
The Relationship Between the Fractal Dimension and the Evolution of Rock-Forming Minerals Crystallization on the Example of the Northwestern Part of the Lovozero Intrusion
by Miłosz Huber, Klaudia Stępniewska and Mirosław Wiktor Huber
Fractal Fract. 2025, 9(2), 100; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9020100 - 5 Feb 2025
Abstract
This article presents the results of fractal texture analyses of selected minerals (aegirine, eudialyte, orthoclase) in the northwestern part of the Lovozero intrusion. This intrusion is located in northeastern Scandinavia and is a massif made of alkaline rocks. There are rocks such as [...] Read more.
This article presents the results of fractal texture analyses of selected minerals (aegirine, eudialyte, orthoclase) in the northwestern part of the Lovozero intrusion. This intrusion is located in northeastern Scandinavia and is a massif made of alkaline rocks. There are rocks such as massive syenites and porphyrtes, as well as iiolites, urtites, and foyaites, accompanied by metasomatic rocks of the contact zone. A box-counting fractal dimension was used to numerically represent the texture of these minerals. In the further part, this coefficient was visualized in the form of maps superimposed on the study area, and some simple arithmetic calculations were performed to highlight the common features of this dimension for the selected rock-forming minerals. In conjunction with the geological interpretation of these results, rock-forming processes in this massif were depicted. This work is preliminary, showing the potential of this calculation method in petrological applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fractals in Geology and Geochemistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Kola–Karelian Alkaline Province with intrusions localizations (after [<a href="#B78-fractalfract-09-00100" class="html-bibr">78</a>] changed by author).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Generalized geological sketch of the Lovozero (after Mikhailova et al. [<a href="#B90-fractalfract-09-00100" class="html-bibr">90</a>] changed by author). Rocks abbreviations: LV1—syenite-layered complex; LV2—eudialyte complex with lujavrites and jovites; LV3—ijolites; LV4—porphyrites; LV5—surrounded cratonic rocks; LV6—quaternary sediments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Microphotographs of typical rocks of the Lovozero Massif: massive syenite (<b>A</b>), nepheline-aegirine foyaite (<b>B</b>), aegirine-nepheline lujavrite (<b>C</b>), aegirine-eudialyte lujavrite (<b>D</b>), aegirine-eudialyte foyaite (<b>E</b>), and jovite (<b>F</b>). Small crystals of loparite can also be seen in the rock. These accessory crystals tend to be euhedral in shape and show twinning. Used abbreviations: aeg—aegirine, eud—eudialyte, ne—nepheline, kfs—alkaline feldspar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Examples of augite porphyrites (<b>A</b>) and vein rocks—loparitite (<b>B</b>). Used abbreviations: aeg—aegirine, eud—eudialyte, ne—nepheline, lop—loparite, epi—epistolite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Example of counting crystal boundary contour: original microphotograph (<b>A</b>), contrast changes (<b>B</b>), marking the boundaries of counted minerals (<b>C</b>), removing the cones of minerals not included in the calculations (<b>D</b>), grid overlay (<b>E</b>), calculating boxes (<b>F</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Examples of simple geometric figures (<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>) and their fractal dimension.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Microphotographs of examined rock-forming minerals, alkaline rocks with the lowest and highest coefficient of fractal symmetry (given against the background of the mineral). Eudialyte (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>), aegirine (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>), nepheline (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>), alkali feldspar (<b>G</b>,<b>H</b>). Used abbreviations: aeg—aegirine, eud—eudialyte, ne—nepheline, kfs—alkaline feldspar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Distribution map of the fractal dimension factor calculated for aegirine crystals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Distribution map of the fractal dimension factor calculated for nepheline crystals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Distribution map of the fractal dimension factor calculated for eudialyte crystals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Distribution map of the fractal dimension coefficient calculated for crystals of potassium feldspars (microcline).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>A map showing rocks from deeper parts of the intrusion (blue) and shallower parts (red) was obtained by the average of the fractal dimension for nepheline and potassium feldspars multiplied by the inverse of the aegirine dimension.</p>
Full article ">
33 pages, 15434 KiB  
Article
Persisting Rock-Buffered Conditions in the Upper Triassic and Lower Jurassic Dolomites of the Central Apennines (Italy) During Diagenesis, Burial, and Thrusting
by Alessio Lucca, Silvia Mittempergher, Fabrizio Balsamo, Anna Cipriani, Antonino Cilona and Fabrizio Storti
Geosciences 2025, 15(2), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15020035 - 22 Jan 2025
Viewed by 496
Abstract
Basin-scale dolomitization of carbonate sequences occurs over long time spans and results from diagenesis, burial, and tectonically driven fluid fluxes. Depicting the different geological processes producing dolomitized carbonate sequences requires combining accurate field, petrographic, and geochemical analyses. Here, we investigate the dolomitization processes [...] Read more.
Basin-scale dolomitization of carbonate sequences occurs over long time spans and results from diagenesis, burial, and tectonically driven fluid fluxes. Depicting the different geological processes producing dolomitized carbonate sequences requires combining accurate field, petrographic, and geochemical analyses. Here, we investigate the dolomitization processes in carbonates of the Norian to Toarcian age exposed in the Gran Sasso Massif, Central Apennines of Italy, by integrating field observations, standard and CL petrography, carbon, oxygen, strontium and clumped isotopes, minor elements, and X-ray diffractometry. The carbonates show pervasive replacive dolomitization, and dolomite cements are observed in bed-parallel and thrust-related veins. Replacive dolomites show incomplete replacement from modified seawater in oxidizing conditions, with minimum temperatures of 40–65 °C and a 87Sr/86Sr lower than coeval seawater. The first dolomitization event started at shallow burial in the Late Triassic–Early Jurassic and was later affected by replacement at intermediate burial depths. Bedding-parallel dolomite veins crystallized due to fluid overpressures at deep burial depths in a rock-buffered system without variations in geochemistry. Fault-related dolomites cemented thrust-related fractures during compressional deformation in the Messinian–Early Pliocene from seawater modified by mixing with external fluids. Precipitation temperatures of replacive, bedding-parallel, and fault-related dolomite veins are similar. Despite the dolomite types being characterized by different textures and petrographic features, rock-buffered conditions resulted in insignificant variations of their geochemical properties. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sedimentology, Stratigraphy and Palaeontology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Schematic map of Italy indicating the Central Apennines with blue rectangle. (<b>b</b>) Simplified map illustrating the major structures (extensional faults in black and thrust faults in red) and lithostratigraphic domains of the Central Apennines; blue rectangle corresponds to the area shown in <a href="#geosciences-15-00035-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>. (<b>c</b>) Geologic cross-section AB from the inner thrust and fold belt in the SW to the outer foredeep in the NE of the Central Apennines; the solid black line on the right of the section at the bottom of the sedimentary cover represents the top basement of Adria. (<b>d</b>) Paleogeography of the Mediterranean area at the Triassic–Jurassic boundary highlighting the regions composing the epicontinental platform of Adria (written in red) red lines represent plate margins explained in the inset in the lower left corner; ocean basins are written in blue and emerged massifs are shown by hatched areas. (<b>e</b>) Detail of (<b>d</b>) over Adria in the Late Jurassic (modified after [<a href="#B48-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">48</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Google Earth image and (<b>b</b>) simplified geologic map of the study area from Vado di Corno pass in the W to Mt. Camicia in the E (simplified from [<a href="#B50-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">50</a>]). Stratigraphy, structure, and samples are explained in the legend on the top right of the figure. (<b>c</b>–<b>d</b>) Geologic cross-sections illustrating the thrust-bounded tectonic slices. (<b>e</b>) Simplified logs of the Corno Grande, Mt. Prena, and Mt. Camicia. Synthesis of the stratigraphic and facies analyses from [<a href="#B51-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">51</a>,<a href="#B52-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">52</a>,<a href="#B53-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">53</a>]. (<b>f</b>) Panoramic view and linedrawing of the study area roughly parallel to the section shown in (<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Field image of thin-bedded mudstones of the dolomitized Corniola Fm. (<b>b</b>) Detail of low-porosity oncoidal grainstone/packstone showing interparticle dolomite cement; finger for scale. (<b>c</b>) Relatively undeformed wackestones and thin-bedded packstones of Dolomia Principale Fm. (<b>d</b>) Field image of finely laminated, organic matter-rich Dolomie Bituminose Fm. (<b>e</b>) Outcrop picture of bedding-parallel dolomite veins and crackle breccia pockets in well-laminated organic-rich Dolomie Bituminose Fm. (<b>f</b>) Detail of bedding-parallel dolomite vein cluster overprinted by stylolites in the Dolomia Principale Fm. (<b>g</b>) Field photographs of thrust fault in the Calcare Massiccio Fm. and (<b>h</b>) related dolomite veins and crackle to mosaic breccias adjacent to the thrust fault in the Corniola Fm; dotted red lines represent fault surfaces and the red arrows indicate kinematics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Microphotographs in transmitted light of the analyzed samples showing selected microfacies and microfossils. (<b>a</b>) Organic matter-rich, finely laminated dolomite mudstone in DB Fm.; SMF3. (<b>b</b>) Sedimentary breccia with finely laminated dolomicritic lithoclasts in DB Fm.; SMF4. (<b>c</b>) Finely laminated peloidal and cherty wackestone with organic material-rich wavy lamina in DB Fm.; SMF2. (<b>d</b>) Fabric-destructive planar-s dolomite with preserved habit of dasyclads in DP Fm.; SMF11. (<b>e</b>) Coated grains in packstone/wackestone in DP Fm.; SMF8. (<b>f</b>) Foraminiferal packstone/grainstone replaced by planar-s dolomites including abundant foraminifera in DP Fm.; SMF18. (<b>g</b>) Micritized oncoid in wackestone in CM Fm.; SMF8. (<b>h</b>) Fenestral packstone with clotted peloidal fabric in CM Fm; SMF21. (<b>i</b>) Lithoclastic fenestral packstone lamina including textularidae, dasycladads, oxidized clasts, and other foraminifera in CM Fm.; SMF24. (<b>j</b>) Wackestone with sponge spicules in Co Fm.; SMF1. (<b>k</b>) Peloidal bioclastic wackestone with fragments of crinoids in Co Fm.; SMF1. (<b>l</b>) Preserved echinoderm fragment in planar-s fabric-destructive dolomite in Co Fm.; SMF2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Selected microphotographs in PPL and CL. CL images are shown with over-exposed luminescence to highlight the paragenetic phases. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Bedding-parallel dolomite veins in Bituminous Dolostones Fm. showing fine planar-e replacive dolomites (R) in the host rock and a cement composed of coarse dolomite crystals (Z), locally saddle. Both are non-luminescent in CL. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Bedding-parallel dolomite veins in the Dolomia Principale Fm. showing optical continuity of coarse dolomite cement crystals (Z) with replacive, planar-s, fine to medium dolomite (R) of the host rock. Both are non-luminescent. Outer growth, fluid inclusion-rich zones are dull purple luminescent in CL (F). (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) Dolomite vein in the Calcare Massiccio Fm. The host rock shows a fine replacive dolomicrite (R). The dolomite vein cement has a fine crystal size and is solid inclusion-rich at the vein margin and becomes progressively solid inclusion-poor and characterized by larger crystal size (Z), both are dull to non-luminescent. The outer growth zones are saddle-shaped and red luminescent in CL (F). (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>) Thrust-related vein in the Calcare Massiccio Fm. Replacive dolomites are dolomicrites and planar-s, fine-grained, dolomite crystals (R) and are non-luminescent in CL. The vein is cemented by saddle-shaped dolomite crystals with red and thin green-to-yellow growth zone luminescence (F), which is followed by iron sulphides/oxides and late non-luminescent calcite cement (cc). (<b>i</b>,<b>j</b>) Thrust-related vein in the Corniola Fm. The host rock is characterized by fabric-destructive dolomites with slight green to yellow luminescence in CL (R). The vein cement is composed of dolomite crystals with red luminescence in CL and outer greenish growth zones (F), followed by late non-luminescent calcite cement (cc).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Transmitted light (TL) microphotograph showing stylolite in Dolomia Principale Fm. crosscutting fine replacive dolomites, whereas stylolite is overprinted by coarse dolomite crystals. (<b>b</b>) Thin section scan of fenestral-laminated lithoclastic peloidal wackestone with fenestrae cemented by dolomite with increasing crystal size towards the top of the section. (<b>c</b>) Stylolite-crosscutting, replacive dolomicrosparites in the Calcare Massiccio Fm. (<b>d</b>) Stylolite associated with and parallel to bedding-parallel veins in the Corniola Fm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Paragenetic sequences showing the dolomite textures and CL patterns in the studied Upper Triassic and Early Jurassic carbonates. The drawing in the centre of the image shows the simplified dolomitization sequence including replacive (R), bedding-parallel veins (Z), and fault-related (F) dolomites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>XRD analyses results; plots of calcium excess vs. cation ordering. Samples are plotted according to different hosting Formation and dolomite types, as indicated in the legend. Dolomites are clustered in two groups.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Major and trace element analyses results. Plots of (<b>a</b>) magnesium vs. strontium concentration. (<b>b</b>) Iron vs. manganese concentration. (<b>c</b>) Cation ordering vs. strontium concentration. Legend shows hosting lithology and dolomite type.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Carbon and oxygen stable isotope analyses results. The δ<sup>18</sup>O‰ (V-PDB) vs. δ<sup>13</sup>C‰ (V-PDB) plot with dashed areas representing stable isotope ranges of Triassic and Jurassic marine calcite precipitated in equilibrium with seawater from [<a href="#B73-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">73</a>]. The grey area represents dolomites precipitated in equilibrium with Triassic and Jurassic seawater, calculated using the relation reported in [<a href="#B14-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">14</a>]. The samples are plotted according to the different host rock and dolomite types, as indicated in the legend.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Clumped isotope thermometry results. Temperature after [<a href="#B65-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">65</a>], from Δ<sub>47</sub>dol (I-CDES) vs. δ<sup>18</sup>O‰ (V-PDB) plots. Legend indicates the host rock and dolomite types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) Strontium isotope analyses results. <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr of Late Triassic and Early Jurassic seawater from [<a href="#B74-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">74</a>]. The samples are plotted according to the host rock and dolomite types, as indicated in the legend. (<b>b</b>) <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr vs. δ<sup>18</sup>O‰ (V-PDB).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Plot of δ<sup>18</sup>O (‰ V-PDB) vs. clumped isotope temperatures of dolomites; δ<sup>18</sup>O (‰ V-SMOW) of the dolomitizing fluid calculated using the fractionation factor of [<a href="#B66-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">66</a>]. Legend shows hosting lithology and dolomite type.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Simplified 3D block model illustrating the dolomitization stages in the Gran Sasso Massif. (<b>a</b>) Early replacive dolomitization in the Upper Triassic and lower Jurassic carbonates at the northern margin of the Lazio–Abruzzi platform. (<b>b</b>) A closed fluid system persisted in the dolomitized rocks during the passive margin stage, resulting in fluid overpressure at deep burial that led to dolomite cementation in bed-parallel veins. (<b>c</b>) Fault-related dolomite cementation in breccias and veins occurred along thrust fault zones during Messinian–Pliocene compression, with minor contribution of other fluids. Extensional faults are in red; thrust faults are drawn with the same colours in the legend of <a href="#geosciences-15-00035-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>; Triassic units are in pink; Jurassic in blue; Cretaceous in green; and Cenozoic in pale brown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Burial history calculated using the stratigraphic thicknesses reported in [<a href="#B54-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">54</a>,<a href="#B96-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">96</a>]. Thick red lines represent the isotherms of the Central Apennines region, modified from [<a href="#B97-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">97</a>]. The proposed timing of dolomitization stages is represented by the striped and hatched areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>(<b>a</b>) Plot of strontium isotope ratios vs. clumped isotope temperatures. (<b>b</b>) Plot of Ca excess (mol%) vs. clumped isotope temperatures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>(<b>a</b>) Comparison of dolomitizing fluid geochemistry in the Adriatic region from published data and from this study (red); plot of δ18O of dolomites vs. precipitation temperatures; precipitation temperatures of the literature data are measured using fluid inclusion microthermometry when &gt;50 °C, or estimated from the regional context and burial history in the other cases. (<b>b</b>) Paleogeographic reconstruction at the Triassic–Jurassic, indicating with coloured dots the locations of the study area and of the dolomitized rocks from the literature reported in the legend; the legend describes the age of the dolostones, the dolomitization mechanisms, and the paleogeographic context; data from [<a href="#B11-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B12-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">12</a>,<a href="#B13-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">13</a>,<a href="#B14-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">14</a>,<a href="#B15-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B19-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">19</a>,<a href="#B30-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B101-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">101</a>,<a href="#B103-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">103</a>,<a href="#B104-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">104</a>,<a href="#B105-geosciences-15-00035" class="html-bibr">105</a>]. (<b>c</b>) Conceptual model illustrating the main controls over early and late dolomitization processes in Upper Triassic and Lower Jurassic carbonates in the Adriatic region; Late Triassic pelogeography from Blakey R. <a href="https://deeptimemaps.com" target="_blank">https://deeptimemaps.com</a>, accessed on 16 January 2025.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 2396 KiB  
Article
Regularities of Plastic Deformation Zone Formation Around Unsupported Shafts in Tectonically Disturbed Massive Rock
by Petr A. Demenkov and Ekaterina L. Romanova
Geosciences 2025, 15(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15010023 - 10 Jan 2025
Viewed by 441
Abstract
In the presented paper, an approach to assessing the size of the plastic deformation zone around a circular cavity intersecting a crushed disintegrated layer in tectonically stressed massive rock is suggested. Fractured rock zones of different quality and spatial configurations are investigated in [...] Read more.
In the presented paper, an approach to assessing the size of the plastic deformation zone around a circular cavity intersecting a crushed disintegrated layer in tectonically stressed massive rock is suggested. Fractured rock zones of different quality and spatial configurations are investigated in order to predict the size of dangerous plastic deformation zones or zones of potential rock collapses. The analysis is performed by means of numerical modeling after preliminary verification of the model by in situ and monitoring data. The paper explores the impact of such parameters of the fractured rock zone as the GSI index, the true thickness of the zone, and its inclination angle relative to the plane perpendicular to the axis of the excavation. It was found that with the increase in the thickness and angle of inclination of the fractured rock zone, the size of the hazardous zone in the vicinity of the excavation increases, while with the increase in its strength characteristics, the size of the potential failure zone decreases. According to the results of the study, qualitative dependencies are established, which localize and predict the size of the danger zone, or the potential failure zone in the vicinity of an unfixed excavation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Definition of the influence zone of an opening intersecting the fractured rock zone: (<b>a</b>) design scheme; (<b>b</b>) stress fields in the plastic region around a circular opening, or area of potential collapse [compiled by authors]. Figure explanations: <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>l</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>z</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>—</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> relative horizontal size of a potential collapse zone, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>h</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>z</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>—absolute vertical size of a potential collapse zone; <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>—fractured rock zone thickness; <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>—fractured rock zone inclination angle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Variation in stress in rocks [<a href="#B50-geosciences-15-00023" class="html-bibr">50</a>] (data selected from [<a href="#B47-geosciences-15-00023" class="html-bibr">47</a>,<a href="#B48-geosciences-15-00023" class="html-bibr">48</a>]): (<b>a</b>) vertical stress variation with depth; (<b>b</b>) lateral stress coefficient variation (K) with depth. Red circles display values of the rock mass subject stress field components.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Model Verification [compiled by authors].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Plastic zone proportion size <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ξ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> for a fractured rock zone 2 m thick: (<b>a</b>) depending on the inclination angle of the fractured rock zone; (<b>b</b>) depending on the GSI parameter [compiled by authors].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Plastic zone proportion size <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ξ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> for a fractured rock zone 4 m thick: (<b>a</b>) depending on the inclination angle of the fractured rock zone; (<b>b</b>) depending on the GSI parameter [compiled by authors].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Plastic zone proportion size <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ξ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> for a fractured rock zone 6 m thick: (<b>a</b>) depending on the inclination angle of the fractured rock zone; (<b>b</b>) depending on the GSI parameter [compiled by authors].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Plastic zone proportion size <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ξ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> for a fractured rock zone 8 m thick: (<b>a</b>) depending on the inclination angle of the fractured rock zone; (<b>b</b>) depending on the GSI parameter [compiled by authors].</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 2299 KiB  
Article
Berthierine-2H1 from Lovozero Alkaline Massif, Kola Peninsula, Russia: First Structure Model for Berthierine and Complexity-Stability Relations
by Sergey V. Krivovichev, Victor N. Yakovenchuk, Olga F. Goychuk, Yakov A. Pakhomovskii and Vladimir G. Krivovichev
Minerals 2025, 15(1), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/min15010013 - 26 Dec 2024
Viewed by 442
Abstract
Berthierine was found in a natrolite vein intersecting volcanogenic-sedimentary rocks on the slope of Mt. Quamdespakh in the upper reaches of the Suolwai River, Lovozero alkaline massif, Kola peninsula, Russian Arctic. The mineral occurs as well-formed translucent pyramidal crystals up to 250 μm [...] Read more.
Berthierine was found in a natrolite vein intersecting volcanogenic-sedimentary rocks on the slope of Mt. Quamdespakh in the upper reaches of the Suolwai River, Lovozero alkaline massif, Kola peninsula, Russian Arctic. The mineral occurs as well-formed translucent pyramidal crystals up to 250 μm in size. The chemical composition determined by electron microprobe analysis corresponds to the empirical formula VI(Fe2+1.99Al0.94Mg0.03Mn0.04)Σ3.00[IV(Si1.15Al0.85)Σ2.00O5] [(OH)3.92O0.08]Σ4.00; the idealized formula is VI(Fe2+2Al)[IV(SiAl)O5](OH)4. The crystal-structure determination (the first detailed crystal-structure characterization of berthierine) shows that the Lovozero mineral is hexagonal, P63cm (a = 5.3903(4), c = 14.0146(10) Å, V = 352.64(6) Å3, R1 = 0.053 for 338 unique observed reflections), and corresponds to the 2H1 polytype of serpentine-group minerals with 1:1 tetrahedral-octahedral layers. The unit cell contains two M3[T2O5](OH)4 layers (M = Fe2+,Al; T = Si,Al) stacked along the c axis. The calculations of information-based structural and topological complexity parameters indicate that berthierine is structurally and topologically simpler than its chlorite-group polymorph chamosite. Since berthierine usually crystallizes metastably in the stability field of chamosite, the complexity analysis is agreement with the Goldsmith rule that states that, in Ostwald sequences of crystallization, metastable phases are simpler and more disordered than their stable counterparts. This observation can be applied to a general case of the metastable formation of serpentine-group minerals prior to the crystallization of chlorites. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Crystal morphologies and occurrence of berthiertine from Lovozero massif, Kola peninsula, Russia: crystals of berthierine on the surface of natrolite (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>); oriented intergrowth (or twin) of two crystals of berthierine along the (0001) face (<b>c</b>); hexagonal pyramidal crystals with and with no (0001) face ((<b>d</b>) and (<b>e</b>), respectively); scheme showing orientation of two crystals intergrown along the (0001) face (<b>f</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The crystal structure of berthierine-2<span class="html-italic">H</span><sub>1</sub> from Lovozero: general overview (<b>a</b>), projection of the 1:1 layer (<b>b</b>), mutual orientation of two subsequent silicate sheets with an indication of the ditrigonal rotation angle α (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The crystal structure of chamosite-II<span class="html-italic">b</span> (<b>a</b>) and projections of the <span class="html-italic">M</span><sub>3</sub>[<span class="html-italic">T</span><sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>]<sub>2</sub>(OH)<sub>2</sub> (<b>b</b>) and <span class="html-italic">M</span>(OH)<sub>2</sub> (<b>c</b>) layers perpendicular to [001].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Idealized versions of the polyhedral layers in serpentine- and chlorite-group minerals: the [<span class="html-italic">M</span>(OH)<sub>2</sub>] layer of edge-sharing <span class="html-italic">M</span>(OH)<sub>6</sub> octahedra (<b>a</b>), the 1:1 heteropolyhedral [<span class="html-italic">M</span><sub>3</sub>[<span class="html-italic">T</span><sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>](OH)<sub>4</sub>] layer (<b>b</b>), and the 2:1 heteropolyhedral layer <span class="html-italic">M</span><sub>3</sub>[<span class="html-italic">T</span><sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>]<sub>2</sub>(OH)<sub>2</sub> (<b>c</b>). Layer symmetry groups are given for the three layers in (<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>), respectively.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 4397 KiB  
Article
Apatite in Pegmatoid Gabbro (Khudolaz Differentiated Complex, Southern Urals): Electron-Microprobe and LA-ICP-MS Geochemical Study in Context of Petrogenesis
by Ildar R. Rakhimov
Minerals 2024, 14(12), 1271; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14121271 - 13 Dec 2024
Viewed by 500
Abstract
The conducted study shows that apatite is one of the key accessory minerals in the ultramafic-mafic rocks of the Khudolaz differentiated complex in the Southern Urals, including late pegmatoid gabbro. Petrographic and mineralogical investigations determine apatite crystallizing simultaneously with hornblende in pegmatoid gabbro [...] Read more.
The conducted study shows that apatite is one of the key accessory minerals in the ultramafic-mafic rocks of the Khudolaz differentiated complex in the Southern Urals, including late pegmatoid gabbro. Petrographic and mineralogical investigations determine apatite crystallizing simultaneously with hornblende in pegmatoid gabbro from the residual water-saturated melt after plagioclase crystallization at a temperature of 990–800 °C, a pressure of 1–3 kbar, oxygen fugacity from −13.9 to −10.7, and water content of 3.9–5.5 wt. %. Pegmatoid gabbro apatite (Appg) from the Severnyi Buskun composite massif differs from early ultramafic-mafic apatite having a fairly high potential for sulfide-platinum metal mineralization in low chlorine and high fluorine content. Low sulfur concentrations in Appg testify to the lack of sulfide-platinum metal mineralization potential of pegmatoid gabbro, but a scanty potential for rare-metal mineralization (e.g., REE) is possible. Appg is quite poor in REE despite the enrichment of pegmatoid gabbros in REE relative to early ultramafic-mafics, which indicates REE accumulation in the fluid. The ratios of cerium and europium anomalies characterize the Appg crystallization under conditions transitional from the magmatic to the hydrothermal stage. Generally, apatite is a good indicator of the difference in the conditions of formation of late pegmatoid gabbro and early ultramafic-mafic rocks, which determines the importance of this mineral in mineralogical and petrological studies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue LA-ICP-MS and LIBS Applied to Minerals)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Structural-geological scheme of the Southern Urals after [<a href="#B33-minerals-14-01271" class="html-bibr">33</a>] (<b>a</b>) and geological map of the Khudolaz trough after [<a href="#B25-minerals-14-01271" class="html-bibr">25</a>] with changes (<b>b</b>) showing the position of intrusions including Severnyi Buskun composite massif. On the Legend: KDC = Khudolaz Differentiated Complex.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Photos of different gabbro types in Severnyi Buskun quarry: (<b>a</b>) melanogabbro intruded by taxitic gabbro, (<b>b</b>) pegmatoid gabbro lenses in taxitic gabbro, (<b>c</b>) enlarged sketch of image (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Photomicrographs of pegmatoid gabbro from Severnyi Buskun massif of Khudolaz Complex with apatite paragenesis (transmitted light): (<b>a</b>) apatite inclusions within hornblende and plagioclase, (<b>b</b>) apatite inclusions within altered plagioclase. Act = actinolite, Ap = apatite, Chl = chlorite, Hbl = hornblende, Pl = plagioclase.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Diagrams F–Cl–OH (<b>a</b>) in apfu, F–Cl (<b>b</b>) and Cl–SO<sub>3</sub> (<b>c</b>) in wt. % for apatite from Khudolaz Complex ultramafic-mafics. Ap<sub>1</sub> = unaltered apatite, Ap<sub>2</sub> = metasomatized apatite, Ap<sub>pg</sub> = apatite from pegmatoid gabbro from Severnyi Buskun massif. Ap<sub>1</sub> and Ap<sub>2</sub> are from sulfide ore-bearing samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variation plots (wt. %) CaO–FeO (<b>a</b>), CaO–MgO (<b>b</b>), CaO–MnO (<b>c</b>), CaO–SrO (<b>d</b>), CaO–Ce<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<b>e</b>), P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>–SiO<sub>2</sub> (<b>f</b>) of apatite from Khudolaz Complex ultramafic-mafics. Symbols as in <a href="#minerals-14-01271-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Plots (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) show distribution of Fe and Mg cations between hornblende and coexisting apatite in pegmatoid gabbro from Severnyi Buskun massif of Khudolaz Complex. R<sup>2</sup>—approximation reliability value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Sr vs. Element correlation plot (ppm) to apatite from pegmatoid gabbro, Severnyi Buskun massif of Khudolaz Complex. R<sup>2</sup>—approximation reliability value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Chondrite-normalized (<b>a</b>) and rock-normalized (<b>b</b>) patterns of REE in apatite from Khudolaz Complex ultramafic-mafics. Symbols as in <a href="#minerals-14-01271-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>. Chondrite composition taken from [<a href="#B39-minerals-14-01271" class="html-bibr">39</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>FeO vs. MgO plot to apatite from pegmatoid gabbro, Severnyi Buskun massif of Khudolaz Complex, showing the joint accumulation of iron and magnesium depending on the composition of rocks according to [<a href="#B17-minerals-14-01271" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Ce anomaly vs. Eu anomaly in apatite from Khudolaz Complex ultramafic-mafics after [<a href="#B6-minerals-14-01271" class="html-bibr">6</a>]. Symbols as in <a href="#minerals-14-01271-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 2277 KiB  
Article
Investigating an Enhanced Contour Blasting Technique Considering Rock Mass Structural Properties
by Askar Imashev, Aibek Mussin and Amoussou Coffi Adoko
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(23), 11461; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142311461 - 9 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 664
Abstract
When excavating tunnels and underground openings with the drill-and-blast method, minimizing excavation overbreak is vital, as it reduces the costs associated with excavation stability, mucking, and rock support. Overbreak in excavations not only causes safety concerns but also increases the cost of construction [...] Read more.
When excavating tunnels and underground openings with the drill-and-blast method, minimizing excavation overbreak is vital, as it reduces the costs associated with excavation stability, mucking, and rock support. Overbreak in excavations not only causes safety concerns but also increases the cost of construction and completion time. This paper proposes a contour blasting design in which the parameters are optimized based on the rock’s structural properties. Numerical modeling was used to identify the possible damage zones of rock with a change of the seismic load due to blasting. The results were used as input for the design of the proposed contour blasting with a low-brisance explosive. Experimental blasting tests were conducted at the Akbakai mine, located in Kazakhstan, and the performance of the design was examined. The proposed contour blasting was compared with the standard blasting method. The results indicated that the cross-section of excavation with the conventional blasting method varied between 10.5 and 12.1 m2, indicating an overbreak between 17 and 34%. However, with the suggested contour blasting, the overbreak was less than 13%. It was concluded that charging contour boreholes with low-brisance explosives is an effective method of reducing overbreak due to excessive explosive loads on the contour massif, which can improve the safety and profitability of mining operations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Underground Rock Support and Excavation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Illustration of blast-induced rock mass damage zones around an underground excavation; (<b>b</b>) overbreak and underbreak in underground excavations opened with drill-and-blast method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Blasting passport description: (<b>a</b>) blast holes layout (blue marks and red marks are the contour and stopping holes, respectively); (<b>b</b>) charging of the contour holes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Simulations of the stress states around the excavation cross-section: (<b>a</b>) using the conventional method of blasting; (<b>b</b>) using the proposed contour blasting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Profiles of the surveyed excavations blasted using (<b>a</b>) conventional blasting and (<b>b</b>) the proposed contour blasting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Overbreak distribution along the excavations after 37 rounds of blasting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Excavation surface appearance: (<b>a</b>) rougher surface in conventional blasting; (<b>b</b>) smoother surface in the proposed contour blasting.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 25477 KiB  
Article
Mineralogical Features of Ultramafic and Mafic Rocks of Syum-Keu Ophiolite (Polar Urals, Russia): Implications for Petrology and Paleogeodynamics
by Timur D. Shabutdinov, Dmitry E. Saveliev, Ruslan A. Gataullin and Aidar A. Samigullin
Minerals 2024, 14(12), 1245; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14121245 - 6 Dec 2024
Viewed by 876
Abstract
The Syum-Keu massif is the northernmost ophiolite complex of the Ural mobile belt. It differs from other massifs of the Polar Urals due to the prominent distribution of lherzolites in the upper mantle section. This feature aligns it more closely to some massifs [...] Read more.
The Syum-Keu massif is the northernmost ophiolite complex of the Ural mobile belt. It differs from other massifs of the Polar Urals due to the prominent distribution of lherzolites in the upper mantle section. This feature aligns it more closely to some massifs in the southern part of the belt (Kraka). Thus, a comparison of the ultramafic rock compositions in these massifs is highly relevant. Thus, comparing the compositions of ultramafic rocks from these massifs is highly relevant and is one of the primary objectives of this study. Our second objective is to study the microstructural features of ultramafic rocks from the upper mantle, as they can indicate modes of subsolidus processes that played a key role in the formation of this massif. Our study utilizes optical microscopy, assessments of bulk rock composition using X-ray fluorescence and ICP-MS, as well as mineralogical methods, such as scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectroscopy and electron backscattered diffraction, for the microstructural analysis of peridotites. In addition to ultramafic rocks from the upper mantle section, the composition and mineralogy of mafic rocks from the crustal section were studied. The microstructural analysis of ultramafic rocks indicates their two-stage evolution. The first is associated with plastic flow under the upper mantle conditions dominated by the olivine slip along the {0kl}[100] system, while the second reflects formation in the lower crust, with lower-temperature deformation along the {110}[001] slip system. Comparing the mineralogy of the Syum-Keu peridotites to lherzolite massifs in the Southern Urals reveals a significant difference in accessory Cr-spinel composition; the former show elevated iron content (Fe trend), indicating intense crustal metamorphism. Similarly, amphiboles in Syum-Keu ultramafic rocks exhibit a significant crustal (metamorphic) component, while the same minerals in the Kraka massif suggest a mantle (magmatic) origin. Mafic rocks in the Syum-Keu massif also typically display a high degree of metamorphism. The obtained results generally corroborate prior findings on a longer evolution of the upper mantle ultramafic rocks of the Syum-Keu massif compared to those of the Kraka massif. Our results are also consistent with the suprasubduction nature of these ultramafic rocks. Our findings can be utilized in further studies of the microstructure and composition of ophiolites from the Polar Urals to provide a more detailed characterization of the partial melting conditions of the mantle source, the plastic flow of peridotites, and their interaction with melts and fluids. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Schematic geological map of the Syum–Keu massif (after [<a href="#B16-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">16</a>,<a href="#B17-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">17</a>,<a href="#B18-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">18</a>,<a href="#B19-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">19</a>]). (<b>a</b>) Schematic map of Urals. (<b>b</b>) Geological map of Syum-Keu massif.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Petrographic features of ultramafic rocks. Transmitted light, in pairs of pictures, with analyzer (right) and without analyzer (left). (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) dunite (S-301-2; S-324); (<b>c</b>) lherzolite (S-304-9); (<b>d</b>) olivine websterite (S-323-1); (<b>e</b>) clinopyroxenite (S-302-3b); (<b>f</b>) orthopyroxenite (S-311-4); Cpx—clinopyroxene, Ol—olivine, Opx—orthopyroxene, Chr—Cr–spinels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Petrographic features of mafic rocks. Transmitted light, in pairs of pictures, with analyzer (left) and without analyzer (right). (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Garnet–gabbro (S-314; S-318–1); (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) gabbro–norite (S-316; S-318); (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) amp–gabbro (S-341; S-345). Amp—amphiboles, Chl—chlorite, Cpx—clinopyroxene, Grt—garnet, Opx—orthopyroxene.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Compositional features of ultramafic and mafic rocks. (<b>a</b>) Normative mineral composition ultramafic rocks (peridotites, dunite, pyroxenites), this study and fer. [<a href="#B22-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">22</a>]. (<b>b</b>) A vs. S diagram, following [<a href="#B28-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">28</a>]: A = Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> + CaO + Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O, S = SiO<sub>2</sub> − (Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> + FeO + MgO + MnO + TiO<sub>2</sub>). (<b>c</b>) Normative mineral composition mafic rocks. (<b>d</b>) Total Alkali-Silica (TAS) diagram (SiO<sub>2</sub> vs Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O), following [<a href="#B29-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">29</a>]. Cpx—clinopyroxene, Ol—olivine, Opx—orthopyroxene, Pl—plagioclase.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Compositional features of ultramafic rock-forming minerals: (<b>a</b>) pyroxenes; (<b>b</b>) amphiboles, following [<a href="#B26-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">26</a>]; Cpx—clinopyroxenes, Opx—orthopyroxenes, Lz—lherzolites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Accessory minerals in (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>) dunites (S-348-1A, S-304-1A, S-301-2, S-351D), (<b>b</b>) harzburgites (S-328), (<b>c</b>) lherzolites (S-337-1), (<b>e</b>) gabbro–norites (S-313-2), and (<b>f</b>) garnet-bearing gabbro (S-314). Cpp—chalcopyrite, Cpx—clinopyroxene, Cu—native copper, Grt—garnet, Ilm—ilmenite, Irs—irarsite, Mag—magnetite, Mlr—millerite, Muc—maucherite, Opx—ortopyroxene, Os—native osmium, Pl—plagioclase, Pn—pentlandite, Ptr—potarite, Py—pyrite, Tmt—titanomagnetite, (Zn,Cd)S)—cadmium-bearing sphalerite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of compositions of Cr-spinel of Syum-Keu and ophiolitic massifs of the Southern Urals: (<b>a</b>) On the classification diagram, following [<a href="#B30-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">30</a>]: 1—chromite, 2—Al-chromite, 3—Cr-picotite, 4—picotite (hercynite), 5—Fe-chromite, 6—Fe-picotite, 7—Cr-magnetite, 8—Al-magnetite, 9—magnetite. (<b>b</b>) On the Mg#–Cr# diagram: Cr# = Cr/(Cr + Al + Fe<sup>3+</sup>), Mg# = Mg/(Mg + Fe<sup>2+</sup>) [<a href="#B20-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">20</a>,<a href="#B22-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B31-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">31</a>,<a href="#B32-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">32</a>,<a href="#B33-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">33</a>,<a href="#B34-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">34</a>]. “Spinel gap” field from [<a href="#B35-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">35</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Features of rock–forming mineral compositions: (<b>a</b>)—plagioclases; (<b>b</b>)—pyroxenes; (<b>c</b>)—amphiboles, following [<a href="#B26-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">26</a>]; (<b>d</b>)—chlorites, following [<a href="#B36-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">36</a>]; (<b>e</b>)—garnets. Cpx—clinopyroxenes, Opx—orthopyroxenes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Olivine lattice preferred orientations (LPO) in Syum-Keu peridotites. The color coding refers to the density of data points. S—foliation, L—lineation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Composition of amphiboles: (<b>a</b>)—classification diagrams Si vs. Mg/(Mg + Fe<sup>2+</sup>), after [<a href="#B26-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">26</a>]; (<b>b</b>)—Al<sup>IV</sup> a.p.f.u. vs. Na + K, following [<a href="#B37-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">37</a>]; (<b>c</b>)—diagram Si vs. Ca + Na + K a.p.f.u., after [<a href="#B38-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">38</a>]; (<b>d</b>)—diagram Al<sup>VI</sup>–Al<sup>IV</sup> a.p.f.u., following [<a href="#B39-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; (<b>e</b>)—diagram Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>–TiO<sub>2</sub> in wt.%, following [<a href="#B40-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">40</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) Geodynamic diagrams: (<b>a</b>) Mg# vs. Cr# in Cr-spinel with fields of abyssal peridotites, boninites, after [<a href="#B3-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">3</a>], and fore-arc after [<a href="#B5-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">5</a>]; (<b>b</b>) Cr# vs. Fe<sup>3+</sup> in Cr-spinel, after [<a href="#B8-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">8</a>]; (<b>c</b>) Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> vs. Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> in Cr-spinel, after [<a href="#B9-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">9</a>]; (<b>d</b>) Cr# vs. Fe<sup>3+</sup>/(Fe<sup>3+</sup>+Fe<sup>2+</sup>) Cr-spinel, after [<a href="#B7-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">7</a>]. Fore-arc peridotites: SSF—South Sandwich Arc, CS—Cone Seamount, TS—Torishima Seamount, TFA—Tonga Fore-arc; Sx—subduction xenoliths, Rp—ridge peridotites. (<b>e</b>) TiO<sub>2</sub> vs. Cr#, after [<a href="#B6-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">6</a>], showing the degree of melting in mantle rocks (curve labeled 5.0%, 10.0%, 15.0%, and 20.0%). Response trends with boninite melts (1), island-arc tholeiitic melts (2), and MORB melts (3). (<b>f</b>) Ti vs. Al(t) in clinopyroxenes, IAT—island-arc tholeiites, BON—boninite, MORB—mid-ocean ridge basalts, after [<a href="#B4-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">4</a>]. D—dunite; Hb—harzburgite; Lz—lherzolite; Px—pyroxenite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>P–T conditions for the formation of mineral associations of ultramafic rocks. (<b>a</b>) OSMA diagram for coexisting olivine and Cr-spinel grains, after [<a href="#B41-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">41</a>]; (<b>b</b>) distribution of equilibrium temperatures in olivine–Cr-spinel pairs for peridotites, after [<a href="#B42-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">42</a>,<a href="#B43-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">43</a>,<a href="#B44-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">44</a>]; (<b>c</b>) distribution of equilibrium temperatures in diopside–enstatite pairs for peridotites, after [<a href="#B45-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">45</a>,<a href="#B46-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">46</a>,<a href="#B47-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">47</a>]; (<b>d</b>) P–T conditions of mantle peridotites, with fields based on data following [<a href="#B47-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">47</a>,<a href="#B48-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">48</a>,<a href="#B49-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">49</a>]; (<b>e</b>) Cr# vs. Δlog<span class="html-italic">f</span>O<sub>2</sub> diagram: margins based on data following [<a href="#B50-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">50</a>,<a href="#B51-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">51</a>] (1–3—peridotite xenoliths (1—primitive, 2—weakly metasomatised, 3—intensely metasomatised), 4–5—abyssal peridotites, 6—suprasubduction peridotites; bold lines outline the fields of abyssal peridotites and peridotites of island arcs; D—dunite; Hb—harzburgite; Lz—lherzolite; Px—pyroxenite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Phase composition maps (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>) and microstructural maps in the encoding of inverse pole figures (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>) for some samples of Syum–Keu peridotites. HAGB—high-angle grain boundaries, LAGB—low-angle grain boundaries (sub-boundaries). Data processing was carried out in the MTEX program [<a href="#B60-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">60</a>,<a href="#B61-minerals-14-01245" class="html-bibr">61</a>].</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 7123 KiB  
Article
Does Microplastic Pollution in the Epikarst Environment Coincide with Rainfall Flushes and Copepod Population Dynamics?
by Lara Valentić, Tanja Pipan and Nataša Ravbar
Sustainability 2024, 16(22), 10123; https://doi.org/10.3390/su162210123 - 20 Nov 2024
Viewed by 790
Abstract
Karst areas are characteristic landscapes formed by the dissolution of soluble rocks, whose hydrology is largely influenced by rapid infiltration through the karst massif. These areas are often hotspots of biodiversity, especially for epikarst and cave fauna. The epikarst, the uppermost layer of [...] Read more.
Karst areas are characteristic landscapes formed by the dissolution of soluble rocks, whose hydrology is largely influenced by rapid infiltration through the karst massif. These areas are often hotspots of biodiversity, especially for epikarst and cave fauna. The epikarst, the uppermost layer of the unsaturated zone, plays a crucial role in regulating water flow in karst aquifers. The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of microplastic (MP) pollution, its relationship with precipitation and its correlation with copepod populations in karst areas. The study was conducted between April 2021 and October 2022 in the Postojna–Planina karst area in SW Slovenia at surface and underground sampling sites to determine the pathways of MP pollution from the surface to the depth of the karst massif. The results indicate that heavier rainfall flushes out more MP contaminants from the surface and epikarst environment. The transport dynamics of MP pollution are similar to the dynamics of copepods, which are the baseline organisms for the food chain in caves. One MP sample contained only polyamide particles, which could indicate clothing as a possible source of pollution, but the results are inconclusive. With this study, we provide the first insight into the transport of MP pollution from the surface environment to deeper karst massifs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Karst Groundwater Sustainability)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area, as well as surface and underground sampling sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Example of MP sampling at sampling site JEZ in the Planina cave (photo: N. Ravbar).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>This graph shows the precipitation and hydrochemical conditions in the underground stations of JEZ and POJA during the individual sampling periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Relationship between abundance of copepods and average discharge during particular sampling periods in PPCS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Distribution of microplastic particles found in rainfall samples from above Postojna–Planina cave system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Distribution of found microplastic particles in water samples from Postojna–Planina cave system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Number of MP polymers found in samples from Postojna cave and rainfall above Postojna cave.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Number of MP polymers found in samples from Planina cave and rainfall above Planina cave.</p>
Full article ">
32 pages, 9777 KiB  
Article
Geochemical Characterization of and Exploration Guide for the World-Class Mafic–Siliciclastic-Hosted Touro VMS Cu Deposit, Northwestern Iberian Peninsula
by Pablo Nuñez, Alvaro Rubio, Daniel Arias, Jorge Fuertes-Blanco, Fernando Cortés, Fernando Díaz-Riopa and Agustin Martin-Izard
Minerals 2024, 14(11), 1159; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14111159 - 16 Nov 2024
Viewed by 776
Abstract
A geochemical study was conducted on the Touro deposit, which is situated within the Iberian Variscan Massif on the allochthonous terrain of the Galicia–Tras-os-Montes Zone. This study encompassed both mineralogical and geochemical analyses of the host rocks, with a particular focus on the [...] Read more.
A geochemical study was conducted on the Touro deposit, which is situated within the Iberian Variscan Massif on the allochthonous terrain of the Galicia–Tras-os-Montes Zone. This study encompassed both mineralogical and geochemical analyses of the host rocks, with a particular focus on the high-grade Fornás metamorphic unit of the Órdenes Complex. The deposit is composed of massive and semi-massive sulfides, the host rocks are amphibolites and paragneisses, and the ore is hosted in garnet amphibolites and mineralized paragneisses. A microscopic study of thin sections and over 300 electron probe microanalyses on various minerals were conducted with the objective of geochemical characterization. Furthermore, a study of approximately 6000 samples processed by mining companies for multielement analyses of over 1350 drill cores was conducted to geochemically characterize the host and mineralized rocks for use as exploration guides. Additionally, five samples underwent Sm-Nd isotope analysis. The data from the Touro Cu (Zn-Co) deposit are consistent with its classification as a mafic–siliciclastic (Besshi-type) VMS deposit constructed in a back-arc environment during the Ordovician period. Following burial and high-grade metamorphism during the Middle Devonian period, these rocks were subsequently exposed during the later Variscan deformation phases, resulting in the formation of the Arinteiro antiform. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mineralization and Geochemistry of VMS Deposits)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>) Geological map of the Iberian Variscan Massif. CZ: Cantabrian Zone; WALZ: West Asturian–Leonese Zone; CIZ: Central Iberian Zone; OMZ: Ossa Morena Zone; SPZ: South Portuguese Zone. (<b>B</b>) The following geological map of the NW Iberian Massif illustrates the positions of the various allochthonous units of the Galicia–Trás-os-Montes Zone and Central Iberian Zone. Additionally, the location of the Touro deposit is indicated. From [<a href="#B1-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">1</a>], adapted from [<a href="#B9-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">9</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geological map and cross sections of the Touro copper deposit, from [<a href="#B3-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">3</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Microprobe results: (<b>A</b>) garnet classification; (<b>B</b>) mica classification; (<b>C</b>) amphibole classification; (<b>D</b>) feldspar classification; (<b>E</b>) chlorite classification; (<b>F</b>) epidote classification [<a href="#B44-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">44</a>,<a href="#B45-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">45</a>,<a href="#B46-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">46</a>,<a href="#B47-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">47</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Th vs. Ba + Sr binary diagram allowing for the differentiation of each type of rock plot in a distinct area. Furthermore, the plot of the 25 additional samples analyzed by our team is consistent with the expected results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Ca vs. Ba + Sr binary diagram permitting the distinction between the rock types, albeit with less clarity than that afforded by <a href="#minerals-14-01159-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Cu vs. Th binary diagram demonstrating a strong correlation between the Cu content and the occurrences of garnet amphibolites and mineralized paragneisses. The recently obtained 24 samples were incorporated into the relevant lithological groups.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Th vs. Co binary diagram of the studied samples exhibits a striking resemblance to those employing Cu, suggesting a correlation between copper and cobalt. The recently obtained 24 samples were incorporated into the relevant lithological groups.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Cu vs. Co binary diagram of the studied samples, which illustrates the intimate relationship between Cu and Co mineralization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Al/(Al + Fe + Mn) vs. Fe/Ti plot from the Touro deposit [<a href="#B49-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">49</a>] subsequently modified in [<a href="#B50-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">50</a>,<a href="#B51-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">51</a>]. The average compositions for metalliferous sediments from the Red Sea and East Pacific Rise, pelagic sediment from the Pacific Ocean, and terrigenous sediments [<a href="#B50-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">50</a>] and the average MORB value are also shown for reference. The vertical lines indicate the percentage of mixing between the marine and metalliferous sediments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>A FeO + MgO vs. TiO<sub>2</sub> plot illustrating the chemical modification of rocks (yellow: paragneisses; green: amphibolites) resulting from the introduction of Fe into the system during the mineralization process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Diagrams showing the variation in selected groups of elements vs. MgO for unmineralized mafic igneous rocks: metabasalts (amphibolites) in blue, metagabbros (pyroxenites) in green. It should be noted that the available SiO<sub>2</sub> analyses are limited to a subset of samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>A</b>) Na + K vs. Mg binary diagram, which compares metabasic rock values of Na<sub>2</sub>O and K<sub>2</sub>O with those of MgO, demonstrates that the majority of the data points fall below the 4% threshold for alkali values. (<b>B</b>) FeO-MgO-Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O ternary diagram of [<a href="#B52-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">52</a>] depicts an AFM plot with the same samples, which was utilized for the subalkaline igneous rock characterization, indicating their tholeiitic nature. The green limits indicate the percentage of data, with the darker-green color indicating the highest percentage range.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Th-Co binary diagram [<a href="#B53-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">53</a>]. The green limits indicate the percentage of data falling within the following ranges: 0%–5%, 5%–10%, and over 10%. The squares and triangles represent mafic rocks from the Corredoiras and Monte Castelo units, respectively (data sourced from [<a href="#B16-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">16</a>]). The samples are situated at the boundary between the calc-alkaline and tholeiitic fields (B: basalts; BA/A: basalt andesite/andesite; D/R: dacite/rhyolite).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>A 100 × K<sub>2</sub>O/Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O vs. Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O plot was constructed to examine the hydrothermal alteration potential of the mafic rocks. The green limits indicate the percentage of data within the following ranges: 0%–5%, 5%–10%, and over 10%. The majority of the mafic samples fall within the range of unaltered samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>(<b>A</b>) Hf/3-Th-Nb/16 ternary diagram [<a href="#B54-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">54</a>]. (<b>B</b>) Ti/100-Zr-3*Y ternary diagram [<a href="#B55-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">55</a>]. The green limits indicate the percentage of data within the following ranges: 0%–5%, 5%–10%, and over 10%. Squares and triangles are as in <a href="#minerals-14-01159-f013" class="html-fig">Figure 13</a> (data from [<a href="#B16-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">16</a>,<a href="#B23-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">23</a>]). The diagrams (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) illustrate the degree of data dispersion, with the majority of samples positioned within the E-MORB and intraplate tholeiitic fields consistent with the back-arc tectonic setting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Spider diagram for amphibolites normalized to the N-MORB standard [<a href="#B56-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">56</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Binary diagrams illustrating the variation in the selected groups of elements vs. MgO for amphibolites (in dark blue) and mineralized garnet amphibolites (in pale blue), which may exhibit varying degrees of mineralization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Binary diagrams illustrating the variation in the selected groups of elements vs. Th for unmineralized (in yellow) and mineralized (in orange) paragneisses, which may exhibit varying degrees of mineralization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Spider diagram for paragneiss normalized to the N-MORB standard [<a href="#B56-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">56</a>]. The yellow and green areas represent paragneisses and mineralized paragneisses, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>The <sup>147</sup>Sm/<sup>144</sup>Nd vs. <sup>143</sup>Nd/<sup>144</sup>Nd plot for the samples that correspond to the two main lithologies (green circles: amphibolites; brown triangles: paragneisses). The discrepancies are less significant than the symbols that have been employed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>The TDm [<a href="#B59-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">59</a>] model age for the analyzed metagreywackes of the Órdenes Complex is 500 Ma. Previously obtained model ages published in [<a href="#B17-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">17</a>,<a href="#B61-minerals-14-01159" class="html-bibr">61</a>] from gneisses and basic rocks are also shown for comparison (brown band).</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 16528 KiB  
Article
Mortars in the Archaeological Site of Hierapolis of Phrygia (Denizli, Turkey) from Imperial to Byzantine Age
by Matteo Maria Niccolò Franceschini, Sara Calandra, Silvia Vettori, Tommaso Ismaelli, Giuseppe Scardozzi, Maria Piera Caggia and Emma Cantisani
Minerals 2024, 14(11), 1143; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14111143 - 11 Nov 2024
Viewed by 885
Abstract
Hierapolis of Phrygia, an archaeological site in southwestern Turkey, has been a UNESCO World Heritage Site since 1988. During archaeological campaigns, 71 mortar samples from public buildings were collected, dating from the Julio-Claudian to the Middle Byzantine period. The samples were analyzed using [...] Read more.
Hierapolis of Phrygia, an archaeological site in southwestern Turkey, has been a UNESCO World Heritage Site since 1988. During archaeological campaigns, 71 mortar samples from public buildings were collected, dating from the Julio-Claudian to the Middle Byzantine period. The samples were analyzed using a multi-analytical approach including polarized optical microscopy (POM), digital image analysis (DIA), X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) and SEM–EDS to trace the raw materials and understand the evolution of mortar composition and technology over time. During the Roman period, travertine and marble were commonly used in binder production, while marble dominated in the Byzantine period. The aggregates come mainly from sands of the Lycian Nappe and Menderes Massif, with carbonate and silicate rock fragments. Variations in composition, average size and circularity suggest changes in raw material sources in both Roman and Byzantine periods. Cocciopesto mortar was used in water-related structures from the Flavian to the Severan period, but, in the Byzantine period, it also appeared in non-hydraulic contexts. Straw became a common organic additive in Byzantine renders, marking a shift from the exclusively inorganic aggregates of Roman renders. This study illustrates the evolving construction technologies and material sources used throughout the city’s history. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Significance of Applied Mineralogy in Archaeometry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Plan of the ancient city of Hierapolis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Tectonic map of western Anatolia (A: Gediz or Alaşehir Graben, B: Küçük Menderes Graben and C: Büyük Menderes Graben), modified from [<a href="#B44-minerals-14-01143" class="html-bibr">44</a>]; (<b>b</b>) geological map of the Denizli Basin (modified from [<a href="#B45-minerals-14-01143" class="html-bibr">45</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Some of the main monuments of Hierapolis: (<b>a</b>) The Apollo Sanctuary, Building A; (<b>b</b>) the Stoa of the Springs; (<b>c</b>) Nymphaeum of the Tritons; (<b>d</b>) the Theatre; (<b>e</b>) the Ploutonion; and (<b>f</b>) Church of St. Philip.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Some examples of (<b>a</b>) bedding mortar (SP5 sample—Church of St. Philip); (<b>b</b>) grouting mortar (NT4 sample—Nymphaeum of the Tritons); (<b>c</b>) coating mortar (SS5—Stoa of the Springs); and (<b>d</b>) concrete fill (P7 sample—Ploutonion).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Microphotographs of main aspects of binder and lumps in analyzed mortars (cross polarized nicols): (<b>a</b>) SA-C1 homogeneous micritic binder; (<b>b</b>) SS7 non-homogeneous binder; (<b>c</b>) NA3 binder with recrystallization; (<b>d</b>) P2 binder heterogeneous from micritic to sparitic; (<b>e</b>) P2 travertine underburned fragment; (<b>f</b>) GB2 travertine underburned fragment; (<b>g</b>) P1 marble underburned fragment; (<b>h</b>) SP29 marble underburned fragment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Microphotographs of most common aggregate in analyzed mortars (crossed polarized nicols): (<b>a</b>) TH2 gneiss; (<b>b</b>) SS7 meta-sandstone and schist; (<b>c</b>) SS6 calc-schist and quartzite; (<b>d</b>) SA-C1 amphibolite; (<b>e</b>) TH2 breccias; (<b>f</b>) P6 fossiliferous limestone; (<b>g</b>) P1 on the left micritic limestone and on the right travertine; (<b>h</b>) SS5 crushed ceramic fragment; (<b>i</b>) SA-A2 gabbro-like igneous rock; (<b>j</b>) SA-A1 serpentine fragment; (<b>k</b>) SS6 marble on the left and schist on the right; (<b>l</b>) P6 phyllite with schists.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Microphotographs of sample; (<b>a</b>) SA-C1 bedding mortar; (<b>b</b>) NT1 bedding mortar; (<b>c</b>) SP11, render mortar; (<b>d</b>) SS7 render mortar; (<b>e</b>) SP30 render mortar; (<b>f</b>) SP29 render mortar; (<b>g</b>) SP36 opus sectile bedding mortar; (<b>h</b>) NT4 grouting mortar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Backscattered SEM image of binder: (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) reaction rim between binder and ceramic fragment (NT2 and SS5, respectively); (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) air lime binder (P7 and SA-A1, respectively); (<b>e</b>) HI calculated on selected samples using microchemical SEM–EDS data of binders and lumps. All the acquired data are presented in <a href="#app1-minerals-14-01143" class="html-app">Table S4</a>.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 4951 KiB  
Article
Combining Remote Sensing Data and Geochemical Properties of Ultramafics to Explore Chromite Ore Deposits in East Oltu Erzurum, Turkey
by Amr Abd El-Raouf, Fikret Doğru, Özgür Bilici, Islam Azab, Sait Taşci, Lincheng Jiang, Kamal Abdelrahman, Mohammed S. Fnais and Omar Amer
Minerals 2024, 14(11), 1116; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14111116 - 2 Nov 2024
Viewed by 774
Abstract
The present research’s main objective was to apply thorough exploration approaches that combine remote sensing data with geochemical sampling and analysis to predict and identify potential chromitite locations in a complex geological site, particularly in rugged mountainous terrain, and differentiate the ultramafic massif [...] Read more.
The present research’s main objective was to apply thorough exploration approaches that combine remote sensing data with geochemical sampling and analysis to predict and identify potential chromitite locations in a complex geological site, particularly in rugged mountainous terrain, and differentiate the ultramafic massif containing chromitite orebodies from other lithologies. The ultramafic massif forming the mantle section of the Kırdağ ophiolite, located within the Erzurum–Kars Ophiolite Zone and emerging in the east of Oltu district (Erzurum, NE Turkey), was selected as the study area. Optimum index factor (OIF), false-color composite (FCC), decorrelation stretch (DS), band rationing (BR), minimum noise fraction (MNF), and principal and independent component analyses (PCA-ICA) were performed to differentiate the lithological features and identify the chromitite host formations. The petrography, mineral chemistry, and whole-rock geochemical properties of the harzburgites, which are the host rocks of chromitites in the research area, were evaluated to verify and confirm the remote sensing results. In addition, detailed petrographic properties of the pyroxenite and chromitite samples are presented. The results support the existence of potential chromitite formations in the mantle section of the Kırdağ ophiolite. Our remote sensing results also demonstrate the successful detection of the spectral anomalies of this ultramafic massif. The mineral and whole-rock geochemical features provide clear evidence of petrological processes, such as partial melting and melt–peridotite interactions during the harzburgite formation. The chromian spinels’ Cr#, Mg#, Fe3+, Al2O3, and TiO2 concentrations indicate that the harzburgite formed in a fore-arc environment. The Al2O3 content and Mg# of the pyroxenes and the whole-rock Al2O3/MgO ratio and V contents of the harzburgite are also compatible with these processes. Consequently, the combined approaches demonstrated clear advantages over conventional chromitite exploration techniques, decreasing the overall costs and supporting the occurrence of chromite production at the site. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Exploration Methods and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Illustration depicting the overall distribution of ophiolite belts and prominent tectonic suture areas across Turkey, with modifications derived from [<a href="#B21-minerals-14-01116" class="html-bibr">21</a>,<a href="#B22-minerals-14-01116" class="html-bibr">22</a>]. (<b>b</b>) Geological map specifically detailing the Kırdağ ophiolite, adapted from [<a href="#B23-minerals-14-01116" class="html-bibr">23</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A flow chart showing the methodology of the combined approach applied in the investigated area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) False-color composite image in the RGB of ASTER bands (2, 3, 5). Ultra = ultramafic and Gab = gabbro; (<b>b</b>) false-color composite image in the RGB of ASTER bands (8, 3, 1); (<b>c</b>) false-color composite image in the RGB of ASTER bands (1, 2, 3); and (<b>d</b>) false-color composite image in the RGB of the ASTER band ratio (4/8, 4/1, and 3/2 × 4/3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Grayscale image of the ASTER band ratio (3/4), (<b>b</b>) false-color composite image in the RGB of ASTER MNF (1, 2, 3), and (<b>c</b>) false-color composite image in the RGB of ASTER MNF (9, 6, 4).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) False-color composite image in the RGB of ASTER PCs (1, 2, 3), (<b>b</b>) false-color composite image in the RGB of ASTER ICs (1, 2, 3), (<b>c</b>) false-color composite image in the RGB of ASTER PCs (5, 4, 2), and (<b>d)</b> false-color composite image in the RGB of ASTER (b4, PC1, PC2).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Field snapshot exhibiting the juxtaposition between the host harzburgite and adjacent lithologies (including dunite, pyroxenite, and chromitite) within the research locale. (<b>b</b>–<b>h</b>) Detailed close-up images showcasing the characteristics of the harzburgite, dunite, pyroxenite, and chromitite pod within the mantle section of the Kırdağ ophiolite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Thin-section photomicrographs of the harzburgite (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), dunite (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>), pyroxenite (<b>e</b>), and chromitite (<b>f</b>). Microphotos (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>) were taken under cross-polarized light, (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) were taken under plane-polarized light, and (<b>f</b>) was taken using a reflecting microscope for a chromitite ore sample. In the figure, spnl = chromian spinel, ol = olivine, opx = orthopyroxene, cpx = clinopyroxene, and srpn = serpentine.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Graphical representations (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) illustrating the relationship between the Cr-number, Mg-number, and Cr-number and TiO<sub>2</sub> for chromian spinels within the harzburgite. Abyssal, fore-arc peridotite, and boninite fields are derived from [<a href="#B68-minerals-14-01116" class="html-bibr">68</a>], whereas the reaction fields and partial melting trend are referenced from [<a href="#B66-minerals-14-01116" class="html-bibr">66</a>,<a href="#B69-minerals-14-01116" class="html-bibr">69</a>], respectively. The diagram (<b>c</b>) presents the relationship between TiO<sub>2</sub> and Fe<sup>3+</sup>-number for chromian spinels. The fields representing the Mid-Ocean Ridge (MOR) and Supra-Subduction Zone (SSZ) contexts are based on data from [<a href="#B64-minerals-14-01116" class="html-bibr">64</a>]. Diagram (<b>d</b>) illustrates the correlation between Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and Mg-number for orthopyroxene. In addition, (<b>e</b>) depicts the exact correlation for clinopyroxene. The fields representing abyssal and SSZ peridotites are based on data from [<a href="#B67-minerals-14-01116" class="html-bibr">67</a>]. The diagram (<b>f</b>) illustrates the relationship between V (ppm) and Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/MgO for the harzburgites from the Kırdağ ophiolite. The fields representing the fore-arc and abyssal peridotites are derived from data compiled by [<a href="#B65-minerals-14-01116" class="html-bibr">65</a>,<a href="#B67-minerals-14-01116" class="html-bibr">67</a>], respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Sentinel-2-L2A True Color B4, B3, B2 showing the location of high-potential chromite-bearing mineralized zones based on integrating remote sensing and geochemical results with field validation.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 1542 KiB  
Article
The Influence of Fluoride Ions on the Forms of Lanthanide Migration in Natural and Polluted Waters of the Lovozero Massif (The Kola Peninsula)
by Svetlana Mazukhina, Svetlana Drogobuzhskaya, Vladimir Masloboev, Sergey Sandimirov, Eugenia Krasavtseva and Vladimir Pozhilenko
Minerals 2024, 14(11), 1085; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14111085 - 28 Oct 2024
Viewed by 622
Abstract
A comprehensive study (monitoring, thermodynamic modeling) of natural and anthropogenically polluted waters of the Lovozero Massif has been carried out. A thermodynamic study of the weathering of the Lovozero Massif within the “water-rock-atmosphere” system at a temperature of 5 °C showed that the [...] Read more.
A comprehensive study (monitoring, thermodynamic modeling) of natural and anthropogenically polluted waters of the Lovozero Massif has been carried out. A thermodynamic study of the weathering of the Lovozero Massif within the “water-rock-atmosphere” system at a temperature of 5 °C showed that the elements contained in the rocks of the studied massif influence the formation of the chemical composition of natural waters. It has been established that an increase in the degree of “water-rock” interaction leads to an increase in the concentrations of F, Cl, SO42−, and HCO3 in the solution. This affects the mobility of lanthanum, cerium, and other elements due to the formation of complex compounds with them. The relatively high content of fluorine, phosphorus, and HCO3 (weak and medium acids) in the solution promotes the dissolution of silicates while Si, Al, and P are released into the solution. Monitoring of water from a flooded mine in which there is an increase in the degree of interaction of water with rock showed higher pH values for the concentrations of Na, HCO3, F, P, Al, Si, V, U, La, and Ce. The conclusions are relevant in the context of the use of groundwater for drinking water supply purposes. The obtained information is useful to evaluate the health of the population of the region under study. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The Umbozero mine (the Lovozero Massif), (<b>a</b>) Umbozero mine, (<b>b</b>) pegmatite deposit—pegmatite body “Shkatulka” (highlighting the lilac color against the background of the host rocks).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Water sampling stations (highlighted in red): 1—The Stream Loparitovyj (wastewater from Lovozero mining and processing plant. 2—The River Shomijok. 3—The Spring “Parkovyj”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>)—Water–rock interaction results, T = 5 °C, P 1 bar, the number of moles varied from 1 to −0.25; (<b>d</b>)—Composition of newly formed phases: Msc is KAl<sub>3</sub>Si<sub>3</sub>O<sub>10</sub>(OH)<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>4.5</sub>, Mnt is Na<sub>0.33</sub>Al<sub>2.33</sub>Si<sub>3.67</sub>O<sub>10</sub>(OH)<sub>2</sub>, the concentration in the SiO<sub>2</sub> solution varies from 2.71 to 3.91 mg/L.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 11780 KiB  
Review
Peridotite Weathering and Ni Redistribution in New Caledonian Laterite Profiles: Influence of Climate, Hydrology, and Structure
by Michel Cathelineau, Yoram Teitler, Jean-Louis Grimaud, Sylvain Favier, Fabrice Golfier, Erick Ramanaidou, Sylvain Grangeon, Yohann Kerreveur, Julie Jeanpert, Samuel Étienne, Manuel Muñoz and Marc Ulrich
Minerals 2024, 14(11), 1082; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14111082 - 27 Oct 2024
Viewed by 893
Abstract
The peridotite massifs of New Caledonia are characterised by complex hydrodynamics influenced by intense inherited fracturing, uplift, and erosion. Following the formation of the erosion surfaces and alteration processes, these processes drive chemical redistribution during weathering; particularly lateritisation and saprolitisation. Magnesium, silica, and [...] Read more.
The peridotite massifs of New Caledonia are characterised by complex hydrodynamics influenced by intense inherited fracturing, uplift, and erosion. Following the formation of the erosion surfaces and alteration processes, these processes drive chemical redistribution during weathering; particularly lateritisation and saprolitisation. Magnesium, silica, and trace elements such as nickel and cobalt—released as the dissolution front advances—are redistributed through the system. New observations and interpretations reveal how lateritic paleo-land surfaces evolved, and their temporal relationship with alteration processes since the Oligocene. Considering the geometry of discontinuity networks ranging from micro-fractures to faults, the transfers occur in dual-permeability environments. Olivine dissolution rates are heterogeneously due to differential solution renewal caused by erosion and valley deepening. Differential mass transfer occurs between mobile regions of highly transmissive faults, while immobile areas correspond to the rock matrix and the secondary fracture network. The progression of alteration fronts controls the formation of boulders and the distribution of nickel across multiple scales. In the saprolite, nickel reprecipitates mostly in talc-like phases, as well as minor nontronite and goethite with partial diffusion in inherited serpentine. The current nickel distribution results from a complex interplay of climatic, hydrological and structural factors integrated into a model across different scales and times. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemical Weathering Studies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Main parameters controlling the weathering front development and deepening in the context of supergene alteration of peridotites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geological map of New Caledonia after [<a href="#B31-minerals-14-01082" class="html-bibr">31</a>,<a href="#B55-minerals-14-01082" class="html-bibr">55</a>]. The studied deposits mentioned in the present paper are indicated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Three panoramic landscapes with the indication of paleosurfaces (S1 to Sn; as defined elsewhere by [<a href="#B30-minerals-14-01082" class="html-bibr">30</a>]) and, in white boxes, indication of the Ni-enrichment zones mined in open pits.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Distribution of paleo-surfaces (S1 to Sn) in found typical profiles: slope-dominated profile (Henriette-Opoué; plateau type (Koniambo); flat low latitude plateau (Nakéty); basin type (Goro).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Representative examples of syntectonic ores and talc-like fissures are Tiebaghi, Poro, Cap Bocage (CB with different ope pits: CVW, Orocol, Balise), Koniambo (KON, open pit Cagou), and Goro.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Representative examples of cockade (target-like) ores consist of films of talc-like (Mg-talc-like is whitish in the middle, and the green domain at the periphery of the fracture is filled by Ni-talc-like with a composition close to pimelite. These films are interpreted as being formed by evaporation in fractures crosscutting large boulders. Examples from: (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Koniambo (Open Pit 303); (<b>c</b>) Koniambo, along Track 2; (<b>d</b>) Thio deposit; (<b>e</b>,<b>g</b>) Open Pit “Est Alpha” from Tiebaghi; (<b>f</b>) Open pit “Balise” at Cap Bocage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Representative examples of type 3 ores exploited today on the example of the Cap Bocage open pits (CVW and Balise-13). Relics from stage 1 and 2 ores partially to almost completely dissolved mineral assemblages are still visible within the fine-grained ore type 3 composed of silicates, inherited serpentines, talc-like ± nontronite, and goethite. (<b>a</b>): Boulder (bld) left behind by quarry machinery because not usable as ore in pyrometallurgy; (<b>b</b>): detail of the boulder margin, generally enriched in nickel in microfractures; (<b>c</b>): huge isolated boulder; (<b>d</b>): advanced alteration with small size boulder and relics of previous Ni-rich talc-like fissures under dissolution; (<b>e</b>): bedrock showing the starting dissolution and replacement around fractures, isolating boulders; (<b>f</b>): relics of a talc-like network under dissolution in the saprolite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>): Geochemical evolution along dunite-derived laterite profile at Goro: (<b>a</b>) Major oxides: MgO, SiO<sub>2</sub>, Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, and: Ni (pct = wt%), MnO (%) CoO (%) and Loss of Ignition (LOI, %). (<b>b</b>): Triangular diagram Mg+ Ni/Fe+Al+ Cr/Si (molar) for the same profile. Square colors correspond to colors for each horizon from <a href="#minerals-14-01082-f008" class="html-fig">Figure 8</a>a. The dashed line and arrow provide the sense of the evolution from unaltered bedrock to the upper laterite horizon (ferricrete).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Representative examples of macroscopic features of type 3 ores and the related distribution of metal enrichments (Ni, (Fe, Mn, Cr) distribution in micro-XRF composite maps) around boulders. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>): Fine-grained type 3 ore constituted of silicates impregnated by iron hydroxide with a complex distribution of nickel mainly enriched along pre-existing micro-fissures; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>): boulder with enrichment in nickel at its periphery (in agreement with XRF analysis of a boulder section in [<a href="#B22-minerals-14-01082" class="html-bibr">22</a>]); (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>): detail of the peripheric Ni -enrichment around the boulder, within the pre-existing lizardite network appearing in black fissures (<b>e</b>), and green (<b>f</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Main Ni-mineral phases found in saprolites from New Caledonia, and the ore types: in blue, talc-like found in ore type 1 and saprolites; in light green, serpentine (Ni-Srp) enriched in nickel from the microfissure networks found around boulders, pimelite from breccia (type 2b breccia ores, and target like ore type 2a, Koniambo), and late fractures (Poro example). Tri-octahedral smectites (Sm) (Fe- nontronites, example of Tiébaghi).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Main Ni-bearing mineral phase in ores from stage 1 to 3 observed under HR-TEM: talc-like from the blueish-green veins from stage 1; talc-like from pimelite ores in karst breccia (ore type 2); talc-like from ore type 3 (ferruginous saprolite). The talc-like are again found within the original serpentine framework inherited from the obduction stage. The talc-like are crystallised onto the serpentine layers at the nanometric scale.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) μ-XANES spectra obtained at the Ni K-edge for different nickel mineralised veins in a saprock facies boulder from the Koniambo massif. Note that the two black spectra on top of the graphic result from ab initio calculation help us understand the meaning of feature E, indicating the presence of either Ni-Mg bonding or Ni-Ni bonding (i.e., Ni clustering; from [<a href="#B22-minerals-14-01082" class="html-bibr">22</a>]); (<b>b</b>) series of XANES collected on bulk rocks (large X-Ray beam), on different horizons of the Koniambo lateritic profile. LCF is only performed on the spectra from saprock, matching with a mixture of Ni-bearing polygonal serpentine and Ni-bearing talc-like. Note that the bedrock matches with oceanic lizardite, and spectra from the upper parts of the profile require Ni-bearing oxi-hydroxide model compounds, as shown in [<a href="#B21-minerals-14-01082" class="html-bibr">21</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The main types of Ni-ores at the base of the saprolite: (i) type 1, crack-seal vein (blueish talc-like) developed along serpentine fractures; (ii) type 2a, target-like coating crosscutting a boulder; type 2b, pimelite-quartz infillings of karst breccia; (iii) type 3 ore, saprolite containing fine-grained ore (talc-like and Ni-enriched serpentine), associated with nontronite in some deposits.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Evolution of plateau-type ores from Eocene to present (see text for explanations).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Modelling of the development of boulders considering the existence of two fracture systems, as they are observable in the field (example of the Thio mining open pit on the right-hand side, with main fractures marked as white dashed lines). Modelling was done using a Discrete Fracture Matrix (DFM) model at 95,000 years. (modified from [<a href="#B41-minerals-14-01082" class="html-bibr">41</a>,<a href="#B66-minerals-14-01082" class="html-bibr">66</a>]).</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 35997 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Granite Fertility Utilizing Porphyry Indicator Minerals (Zircon, Apatite, and Titanite) and Geochemical Data: A Case Study from an Emerging Metallogenic Province in the Taimyr Peninsula, Siberian High Arctic
by Stepan V. Berzin, Dmitry L. Konopelko, Sergei V. Petrov, Vasiliy F. Proskurnin, Evgeny I. Berzon, Mikhail Yu. Kurapov, Tamara A. Golovina, Natalya Ya. Chernenko, Vasiliy S. Chervyakovskiy, Roman S. Palamarchuk and Elena M. Andreeva
Minerals 2024, 14(11), 1065; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14111065 - 23 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1156
Abstract
The Taimyr Peninsula in the Russian High Arctic comprises a late Paleozoic-early Mesozoic collisional belt where several porphyry-type mineralization occurrences were identified during the last decade, making this area a potential exploration target for Cu-Mo deposits. In order to further evaluate the metallogenic [...] Read more.
The Taimyr Peninsula in the Russian High Arctic comprises a late Paleozoic-early Mesozoic collisional belt where several porphyry-type mineralization occurrences were identified during the last decade, making this area a potential exploration target for Cu-Mo deposits. In order to further evaluate the metallogenic potential of the poorly outcropped northeastern part of Taimyr, samples from seven granitoid intrusions were investigated in this study aimed to evaluate the granite fertility based on petrography, geochemistry, and composition of porphyry indicator minerals (zircon, apatite, and titanite). The studied intrusions represent small to moderate-sized bodies (40–800 km2) composed of biotite (±amphibole) quartz monzonites, granodiorites, granites, and biotite leucogranites that formed in the course of late Paleozoic-early Mesozoic tectono-magmatic events at the Siberian margins. The late Carboniferous Tessemsky massif represents suprasubduction granitoid series, while the Pekinskiy, Shirokinskiy, Dorozhinskiy, Kristifensenskiy, and Yuzhno-Lodochnikovskiy massifs are correlated with the early Triassic Siberian Traps LIP. The rocks of intrusions comprise a relatively uniform geochemically, predominantly magnesian, slightly peraluminous, calc-alkaline high-K amphibole-bearing I-type granitoid series with adakitic affinity, where Triassic plume-related granitoids inherit geochemical signatures of Carboniferous supra-subduction granitoids, and all rock types are marked by enrichment in LILE and negative Ta, Nb, and Ti anomalies. It is suggested that the adakitic geochemical characteristics of the Taimyr granites are a result of derivation from a relatively homogeneous mafic lower crustal source that formed at the stage of Carboniferous continental subduction and continued to produce granitic melts in the course of the early Mesozoic magmatic evolution. Whole rock geochemistry and composition of porphyry mineral indicators (zircon, apatite, and titanite) indicate that the Taimyr granites crystallized from oxidized water-saturated magmas at moderate temperatures, with the majority of samples showing characteristics typical for porphyry-fertile granites worldwide (fO2 = ΔFMQ +1 to +3 with zircon Eu/Eu* > 0.4 and apatite SO3 > 0.2 wt.%). Data from Dorozhinskiy, Kristifensenskiy, Pekinskiy, and Tessemskiy intrusions fully match geochemical criteria for porphyry-fertile granitoids, and these massifs are considered the most prospective for Cu-Mo mineralization. Granites from Shirokinskiy and Yuzhno-Lodochnikovskiy intrusions only partially match compositional constraints for fertile melts and can be considered as second-tier exploration targets. Finally, available data for the Simsovsky massif preclude its classification as a porphyry-fertile body. These conclusions are in line with previously developed exploration criteria for the northeastern Taimyr, showing that geochemical indicators of granite-fertility can be used on a regional scale in parallel with other exploration methods. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Map of the Arctic region showing location of the Taimyr Peninsula. (<b>b</b>) Simplified geological map of the Taimyr Peninsula and Severnaya Zemlya Archipelago with location of the studied intrusions; modified after [<a href="#B14-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">14</a>,<a href="#B15-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">15</a>]. Contour of the Taimyr porphyry belt and porphyry mineralization after [<a href="#B4-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">4</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simplified geological map of northeast of the Taimyr Peninsula after [<a href="#B19-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">19</a>,<a href="#B62-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">62</a>] with clarifications from the authors, with location of studied late Paleozoic–early Mesozoic granite massifs and with sample location. Legend: 1, 2—massifs of late Paleozoic–early Mesozoic granitoids: (1) moderately alkaline granodiorite-granite and (2) granite-leucogranite; 3—North Kara domain with Ediacaran–Cambrian (?) terrigenous flyschoid formations; 4, 5, 6—Central Taimyr domain with accretionary Neoproterozoic (1), Meso-Neoproterozoic (2) volcano-sedimentary rocks, including ophiolites and paleo-island arc complexes, and Ediacaran–Middle Paleozoic (3) platform carbonate-terrigenous carbonaceous sediments; 7—Jurassic-Cenozoic covered sediments; 8—main faults: Main Taimyr fault (MT), Goltsovsky fault (G), Dorozhninsky fault (D); 9—Cu–Au–Mo-porphyry mineralization; 10—sample location; 11—coastline and rivers. U-Pb zircon ages from [<a href="#B4-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">4</a>,<a href="#B5-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">5</a>,<a href="#B14-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">14</a>,<a href="#B17-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">17</a>,<a href="#B35-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">35</a>,<a href="#B39-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">39</a>,<a href="#B59-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">59</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Outcrop and sample photographs of mineralized granitoids from Shirokinskiy massif (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) and Porphyrovoe Mo occurrence (<b>g</b>) in the northeastern part of the Taimyr Peninsula: (<b>a</b>) outcrop of mineralized granite where rusty colors indicate presence of oxidized ore minerals; (<b>b</b>) sharp-angled fragments of mineralized porphyry granitoid; (<b>c</b>) altered granite with chalcopyrite mineralized veins; (<b>d</b>) typical porphyritic granite; (<b>e</b>) altered granite with pyrite-chalcopyrite mineralization; (<b>f</b>) hydrothermal quartz-pyrite-chalcopyrite vein-type mineralization in altered granite; (<b>g</b>) quartz vein with sulfide mineralization in altered granite containing 0.72 wt.% Cu and 0.2 wt.% Pb. Abbreviations: Ccp—chalcopyrite, Py—pyrite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Granites of the Taimyr Peninsula on classification and discrimination diagrams: (<b>a</b>) Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O vs. SiO<sub>2</sub>, wt.% (TAS) diagram, fields after [<a href="#B66-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">66</a>,<a href="#B67-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">67</a>]: 1—foidolite, 2—foid gabbro, 3—peridotitic gabbro, 4—foid monzodiorite, 5—monzogabbro, 6—gabbro, 7—foid monzosyenite, 8—monzodiorite, 9—gabbroic diorite, 10—monzonite, 11—diorite, 12—foid syenite, 13—syenite and quartz monzonite, 14—granodiorite, 15—granite; (<b>b</b>) ANK vs. ACNK diagram, ANK = Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>mol.</sub>, ACNK = Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O + CaO)<sub>mol.</sub>, fields after [<a href="#B68-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">68</a>]; (<b>c</b>) (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O–CaO) vs. SiO<sub>2</sub>, wt.% diagram, fields after [<a href="#B69-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">69</a>]; (<b>d</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O vs. SiO<sub>2</sub>, wt.% diagram, fields after [<a href="#B70-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">70</a>]; (<b>e</b>) FeO<sub>tot</sub>/(FeO<sub>tot</sub> + MgO) vs. SiO<sub>2</sub>, wt.% diagram, fields after [<a href="#B69-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">69</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE patterns (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>) and primitive mantle-normalized trace element diagrams (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>) of granites from the Taimyr Peninsula: (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Kristifensenskiy and Pekinskiy massifs; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Dorozhinskiy and Tessemskiy massifs; (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) Shirokinskiy and Yuzhno-Lodochnikovskiy massifs. Normalizing values from [<a href="#B72-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">72</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Granites of the Taimyr Peninsula on discrimination diagrams of [<a href="#B74-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">74</a>]: (<b>a</b>) Rb vs. Y + Nb; (<b>b</b>) Y vs. Nb. Abbreviations: VAG—volcanic arc granites; WPG—within-plate granites; Syn-COLG—syn-collisional granites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Granites of the Taimyr Peninsula on discrimination diagrams that are used to distinguish adakite from normal arc lavas: (<b>a</b>) Sr/Y vs. Y and (<b>b</b>) La/Yb vs. Yb. After [<a href="#B75-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">75</a>], field boundaries after [<a href="#B76-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">76</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Composition of zircon from the Taimyr granites on (Sm/La)<sub>N</sub> vs. La discrimination diagram for magmatic and hydrothermal zircon after [<a href="#B77-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">77</a>] showing mixing curves between zircon and mineral inclusions after [<a href="#B78-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">78</a>]. Abbreviations: Ap—apatite, Ttn—titanite, Xtm—xenotime, Aln—allanite, Mnz—monazite, and Kfs—K-feldspar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE patterns in zircon from the Taimyr granites: (<b>a</b>) Dorozhinskiy massif; (<b>b</b>) Kristifensenskiy massif; (<b>c</b>) Pekinskiy massif; (<b>d</b>) Shirokinskiy massif; (<b>e</b>) Simsovskiy massif; (<b>f</b>) Tessemskiy massif. Normalizing values from [<a href="#B72-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">72</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Composition of zircon from the Taimyr granites on discrimination diagrams with fields for barren and fertile magmatic systems: (<b>a</b>) 10,000 × Eu/Eu*/Y vs. (Ce/Nd)<sub>N</sub>/Y; (<b>b</b>) Eu/Eu* vs. Ce/Nd. After [<a href="#B83-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">83</a>,<a href="#B84-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">84</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE patterns in apatite from the Taimyr granites: (<b>a</b>) Kristifensenskiy massif; (<b>b</b>) Pekinskiy massif; (<b>c</b>) Dorozhinskiy massif; (<b>d</b>) Tessemskiy massif; (<b>e</b>) Shirokinskiy massif; (<b>f</b>) Yuzhno-Lodochnikovskiy massif. Normalizing values from [<a href="#B72-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">72</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Composition of apatite from the Taimyr granites on discrimination diagrams: (<b>a</b>) Cl vs. SO<sub>3</sub>; (<b>b</b>) Eu/Eu* vs. Sr/Y after [<a href="#B87-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">87</a>,<a href="#B88-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">88</a>,<a href="#B89-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">89</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Composition of titanite from the Taimyr granitoids on discrimination diagrams with fields for hydrothermal (and/or metamorphic) and magmatic titanite: (<b>a</b>) Al vs. Fe (a.p.f.u.) after [<a href="#B93-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">93</a>,<a href="#B94-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">94</a>]; (<b>b</b>) Th/U vs. Nb/Ta after [<a href="#B95-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">95</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE patterns in titanite from the Taimyr granites: (<b>a</b>) Dorozhinskiy massif; (<b>b</b>) Kristifensenskiy massif; (<b>c</b>) Pekinskiy massif; (<b>d</b>) Tessemskiy massif. Normalizing values from [<a href="#B72-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">72</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Composition of titanite from the Taimyr granites on discrimination diagrams with fields for barren and fertile magmatic systems: (<b>a</b>) (ΣREE + Y)/1000 ppm vs. LREE/HREE; (<b>b</b>) Ta (ppm) vs. Nb × 100 ppm after [<a href="#B98-minerals-14-01065" class="html-bibr">98</a>].</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop