[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (256)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = particleboards

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 2909 KiB  
Article
Utilization of Pine and Birch Juvenile Wood for Low-Density Particleboard Production
by Rafał Czarnecki, Dorota Dukarska, Jakub Kawalerczyk and Arkadiusz Filipski
Materials 2025, 18(5), 1140; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18051140 - 4 Mar 2025
Viewed by 216
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of using juvenile pine and birch wood for the production of particleboards with lowered density, glued with urea-formaldehyde (UF) resin. The wood used was characterized by a number of annual rings ranging from 5 to 13, which ensured [...] Read more.
This study investigated the effect of using juvenile pine and birch wood for the production of particleboards with lowered density, glued with urea-formaldehyde (UF) resin. The wood used was characterized by a number of annual rings ranging from 5 to 13, which ensured that only juvenile wood was used in the study. In addition to the basic characteristics of the wood particles obtained from this type of raw material, the density profiles of the manufactured particleboards, the internal bond, bending strength, modulus of elasticity, swelling, and water absorption after short-term water exposure (2 h) were also investigated. The results were compared to particleboards made from industrial wood particles from mature wood. It was found that particleboards made from juvenile pine wood exhibited higher internal bond than those made from juvenile birch wood. The bending strength of boards made from both types of juvenile wood was comparable to that of industrial particleboards; however, the modulus of elasticity of the particleboards made from juvenile pine was lower, which indicates reduced stiffness. These particleboards also showed higher swelling and water absorption, which may limit their durability under humid conditions. In contrast, birch boards exhibited lower internal bond, but their bending strength and modulus of elasticity were similar to those of industrial particles-based particleboards. Birch boards also showed slightly better water resistance than pine particleboards made from juvenile wood. However, their swelling remained higher than that of industrial particleboards. Overall, particleboards made from juvenile wood, especially birch, show good potential for further research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modern Wood-Based Materials for Sustainable Building)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The area from which the materials for particleboard production were collected [<a href="#B38-materials-18-01140" class="html-bibr">38</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Preparation of wood particles for particleboard production.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Characteristics of wood particles depending on the species and age of wood: (<b>a</b>) fractional composition, (<b>b</b>) bulk density.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The outcomes of density measurements: (<b>a</b>) density profile of particleboards; (<b>b</b>) average density of wood.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Internal bond of particleboards (a, b, c—homogeneous groups of mean values determined by one-factor ANOVA with Tukey’s test).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The results of (<b>a</b>) bending strength (MOR); (<b>b</b>) modulus of elasticity (MOE) of particleboard (a, b, c—homogeneous groups of mean values determined by one-factor ANOVA with Tukey’s test).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Water resistance of particleboards: (<b>a</b>) thickness swelling; (<b>b</b>) water absorption (a, b, c—homogeneous groups of mean values determined by one-factor ANOVA with Tukey’s test).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Cross-sections of particleboards (arrows indicate voids in the board structure).</p>
Full article ">
30 pages, 17875 KiB  
Article
Development and Characterization of Novel Hybrid Particleboard Made from Several Non-Wood Lignocellulosic Materials
by Fazilla Oktaviani Tarigan, Luthfi Hakim, Agus Purwoko, Tito Sucipto, Halimatuddahliana Nasution, Widya Fatriasari, Muhammad Adly Rahandi Lubis, Jajang Sutiawan, Mohammad Irfan Bakhsi, Nam-Hun Kim, Petar Antov, Seng Hua Lee, Rangabhashiyam Selvasembian, Mohd Hazwan Hussin, Manggar Arum Aristri and Apri Heri Iswanto
Polymers 2025, 17(4), 512; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17040512 - 16 Feb 2025
Viewed by 369
Abstract
The green transition trend in the wood-based panel industry aims to reduce environmental impact and waste production, and it is a viable approach to meet the increasing global demand for wood and wood-based materials as roundwood availability decreases, necessitating the development of composite [...] Read more.
The green transition trend in the wood-based panel industry aims to reduce environmental impact and waste production, and it is a viable approach to meet the increasing global demand for wood and wood-based materials as roundwood availability decreases, necessitating the development of composite products as alternatives to non-wood lignocellulosic raw materials. As a result, the purpose of this study is to examine and assess the physical, mechanical, and acoustic properties of particleboard manufactured from non-wood lignocellulosic biomass. The core layer was composed of non-wood lignocelluloses (banana stem, rice straw, coconut fiber, sugarcane bagasse, and fibrous vascular bundles (FVB) from snakefruit fronds), whereas the surface was made of belangke bamboo (Gigantochloa pruriens) and wood. The chemical characteristics, fiber dimensions and derivatives, and contact angles of non-wood lignocellulosic materials were investigated. The contact angle, which ranged from 44.57 to 62.37 degrees, was measured to determine the wettability of these materials toward adhesives. Hybrid particleboard (HPb) or sandwich particleboard (SPb) samples of 25 cm × 25 cm with a target density of 0.75 g/cm3 and a thickness of 1 cm were manufactured using 7% isocyanate adhesive (based on raw material oven dry weight). The physical parameters of the particleboard, including density, water content, water absorption (WA), and thickness swelling (TS), ranged from 0.47 to 0.79 g/cm3, 6.57 to 13.78%, 16.46 to 103.51%, and 3.38 to 39.91%, respectively. Furthermore, the mechanical properties of the particleboard, including the modulus of elasticity (MOE), bending strength (MOR), and internal bond strength (IB), varied from 0.39 to 7.34 GPa, 6.52 to 87.79 MPa, and 0.03 to 0.69 MPa, respectively. On the basis of these findings, the use of non-wood lignocellulosic raw materials represents a viable alternative for the production of high-performance particleboard. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Challenges in Wood and Wood-Based Materials III)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Non-wood lignocellulosic materials.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Raw materials used for the surface layers of the hybrid particleboard produced in this work.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Calculation of contact angle. Description: a: liquid (adhesive), b: fiber diameter, c: distance between fibers, d: contact angle of water with fiber, e: depression from the meniscus formed by water.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Three-layer particleboard.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Alpha-cellulose content in non-wood lignocellulosic materials. L1: banana stem; L2: rice straw; L3: coconut husk; L4: bagasse; L5: snakefruit palm frond FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Hemicellulose content in non-wood lignocellulosic materials. L1: banana stem; L2: rice straw; L3: coconut husk; L4: bagasse; L5: snakefruit palm frond FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Holocellulose content in non-wood lignocellulosic materials. L1: banana stem; L2: rice straw; L3: coconut husk; L4: bagasse; L5: snakefruit palm frond FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Lignin content in non-wood lignocellulosic materials. L1: banana stem; L2: rice straw; L3: coconut husk; L4: bagasse; L5: snakefruit palm frond FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Extractive substance contents in non-wood lignocellulosic materials. L1: banana stem; L2: rice straw; L3: coconut husk; L4: bagasse; L5: snakefruit palm frond FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Ash content of non-wood lignocellulosic materials. L1: banana stem; L2: rice straw; L3: coconut husk; L4: bagasse; L5: snakefruit palm frond FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Fiber images of banana stems and coconut husks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Banana stem and rice straw lumens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Contact angle values for the non-wood lignocellulosic materials: L1: banana stem, L2: rice straw, L3: coconut husk, L4: bagasse, L5: snakefruit palm frond FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Density of SPb fabricated from non-wood lignocellulosic materials and various types of surface layers. P0: without surface layers, P1: 1 mm bamboo strand, P2: 3 mm bamboo strand, P3: 1 mm wood strand, P4: 3 mm wood strand, P5: veneer, L1: banana stem, L2: rice straw, L3: coconut husk, L4: bagasse, L5: snakefruit palm fronds FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Moisture content of SPb fabricated from non-wood lignocellulosic materials and various types of surface layers. P0: without surface layers, P1: 1 mm bamboo strand, P2: 3 mm bamboo strand, P3: 1 mm wood strand, P4: 3 mm wood strand, P5: veneer, L1: banana stem, L2: rice straw, L3: coconut husk, L4: bagasse, L5: snakefruit palm fronds FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Water absorption of SPb fabricated from non-wood lignocellulosic materials and various types of surface layers. P0: without surface layers, P1: 1 mm bamboo strand, P2: 3 mm bamboo strand, P3: 1 mm wood strand, P4: 3 mm wood strand, P5: veneer, L1: banana stem, L2: rice straw, L3: coconut husk, L4: bagasse, L5: snakefruit palm fronds FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Thickness swelling of SPb fabricated from non-wood lignocellulosic materials and various types of surface layers. P0: without surface layers, P1: 1 mm bamboo strand, P2: 3 mm bamboo strand, P3: 1 mm wood strand, P4: 3 mm wood strand, P5: veneer, L1: banana stem, L2: rice straw, L3: coconut husk, L4: bagasse, L5: snakefruit palm fronds FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>MOE of SPb fabricated from non-wood lignocellulosic materials and various surface layers. P0: without surface layers, P1: 1 mm bamboo strand, P2: 3 mm bamboo strand, P3: 1 mm wood strand, P4: 3 mm wood strand, P5: veneer, L1: banana stem, L2: rice straw, L3: coconut husk, L4: bagasse, L5: snakefruit palm fronds FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>MORs of SPb fabricated from non-wood lignocellulosic materials and various surface layers. P0: without surface layers, P1: 1 mm bamboo strand, P2: 3 mm bamboo strand, P3: 1 mm wood strand, P4: 3 mm wood strand, P5: veneer, L1: banana stem, L2: rice straw, L3: coconut husk, L4: bagasse, L5: snakefruit palm fronds FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Internal bonds of SPb fabricated from non-wood lignocellulosic materials and various types of surface layers. P0: without surface layers, P1: 1 mm bamboo strand, P2: 3 mm bamboo strand, P3: 1 mm wood strand, P4: 3 mm wood strand, P5: veneer, L1: banana stem, L2: rice straw, L3: coconut husk, L4: bagasse, L5: snakefruit palm fronds FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Sound absorption coefficient values for the particleboard samples fabricated from non-wood lignocellulosic materials without surface layers. L1P0 (banana stem board without a surface layer), L1P0 (rice straw board without surface layers), L3P0 (coconut husk board without surface layers), L4P0 (bagasse board without a surface layer), and L5P0 (FVB snakefruit palm frond board without surface layers).</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Sound absorption coefficient values for the surface layers of snakefruit palm fronds.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 657 KiB  
Review
Developments in the Recycling of Wood and Wood Fibre in the UK: A Review
by Morwenna J. Spear, Athanasios Dimitriou, Simon F. Curling and Graham A. Ormondroyd
Fibers 2025, 13(2), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/fib13020023 - 15 Feb 2025
Viewed by 951
Abstract
There is great interest in using bio-based materials to reduce the climate impact of materials. Similarly, there is an increased focus on the circular economy and recycling of materials to increase material efficiency and reduce waste. In the case of wood waste, this [...] Read more.
There is great interest in using bio-based materials to reduce the climate impact of materials. Similarly, there is an increased focus on the circular economy and recycling of materials to increase material efficiency and reduce waste. In the case of wood waste, this provides a cluster of benefits but has led to a high demand for the reclaimed material. This review provides updates on several technologies where wood fibre recycling and products from recycled wood fibre are breaking into new markets, including wood fibre insulation products, wood plastic composites, oriented strand boards, and fibreboards. Emerging technologies, such as the ability to recycle medium-density fibreboards, in addition to the more commonly recycled solid wood or particleboard, will allow for a new set of options within the wood cascading chain. Looking ahead, there are likely to be advances in new composite products, as well as other feedstock materials derived from reclaimed wood, such as nanocellulose, pyrolysis oils, or wood polymers reclaimed from the wood feedstock. This review arose from an investigation into the wood recycling sector in the UK. So, the horizon scanning exercise presented here considers the needs and challenges that may arise, if the volume of recycled wood fibre can be increased, in an already highly active market. Such developments would permit an increase in the manufacture of new-generation long-service-life products to enhance carbon storage, and potentially a shift away from bioenergy generation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Fibers for Advanced Materials: Addressing Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Simplified cascade diagram for wood.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simplified network of pathways for wood during recycling, reuse, and energy recovery.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 1498 KiB  
Article
Durability of Cutting Tools Obtained by U-FAST Technology in Particleboard Machining
by Joanna Wachowicz, Jacek Wilkowski, Tomasz Dembiczak and Robert Kruzel
Materials 2025, 18(3), 636; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18030636 - 31 Jan 2025
Viewed by 462
Abstract
The basic material used for tools for machining wood and wood-based materials is WC-Co (Tungsten Carbide with Cobalt)-cemented carbide. The advantages of WC-Co carbides are significant resistance to high temperatures, high hardness, and wear resistance. Wood-based materials, such as particleboard, are particularly difficult [...] Read more.
The basic material used for tools for machining wood and wood-based materials is WC-Co (Tungsten Carbide with Cobalt)-cemented carbide. The advantages of WC-Co carbides are significant resistance to high temperatures, high hardness, and wear resistance. Wood-based materials, such as particleboard, are particularly difficult to machine due to their considerable inhomogeneity and the presence of various types of hard particle inclusions, such as sand. In addition, unlike metals, wood has a low thermal conductivity, which means that most of the heat generated during milling is transferred to the tool. The consequence of this phenomenon is an increased tool temperature. In addition, the use of a coolant is not possible when machining wood-based materials. The durability of carbide blades is mainly influenced by grain size and cobalt content. When analysing WC-Co as a tool material, it is necessary to consider how it is obtained, as this can also significantly affect its properties. This paper presents the results of a durability study of cutting blades produced by the innovative Upgraded Field-Assisted Sintering Technology (U-FAST) sintering method during particleboard milling. The wear of the blades was measured until the wear value, i.e., the maximum loss at the contact surface VBmax, was 0.2 mm. Three groups of WC-Co carbides with different WC grain sizes were tested: 0.1, 0.4, and 0.8 µm. Three rotational speeds were used: 12,000, 15,000, and 18,000 rpm. In the machinability tests, blades with a WC grain size of 0.8 µm showed a twofold increase in tool life compared to commercial blades with a similar grain size gradation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancements in the Structural Integrity of Composite Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geometry of the WC-Co cutting tools used for testing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Density profile on a cross-section of a particleboard [<a href="#B11-materials-18-00636" class="html-bibr">11</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Tool wear. VB<sub>max</sub> is wear width, which is the tool wear criterion.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Tool wear curves of WC (0.1 µm)_5Co composites for different cutting speeds: (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 18,000 rpm, (<b>b</b>) 15,000 rpm, (<b>c</b>) 12,000 rpm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Tool wear curves of WC(0.4 µm)_4Co composites for different cutting speeds: (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 18,000 rpm, (<b>b</b>) 15,000 rpm, (<b>c</b>) 12,000 rpm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Tool wear curves of WC(0.8 µm)_4Co composites for different cutting speeds: (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 18,000 rpm, (<b>b</b>) 15,000 rpm, (<b>c</b>) 12,000 rpm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effect of tool rotation speed on cutting length for Δ<sub>z</sub> = 0.25 mm, for WC-Co composites.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 17479 KiB  
Article
Epoxy as an Alternative Resin in Particleboard Production with Pine Wood Residues: Physical, Mechanical, and Microscopical Analyses of Panels at Three Resin Proportions
by Antonio José Santos Junior, Marjorie Perosso Herradon, Matheus Viana de Souza, Sergio Augusto Mello da Silva, Victor Almeida De Araujo, Diego Henrique de Almeida, Herisson Ferreira dos Santos and André Luis Christoforo
Forests 2025, 16(2), 196; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16020196 - 22 Jan 2025
Viewed by 920
Abstract
Given the construction challenges and the impacts of industrial waste generation and the implications of using chemical adhesives, this study aims to evaluate epoxy as an alternative resin, whose application in the production of wood particleboards is still underexplored. In this regard, its [...] Read more.
Given the construction challenges and the impacts of industrial waste generation and the implications of using chemical adhesives, this study aims to evaluate epoxy as an alternative resin, whose application in the production of wood particleboards is still underexplored. In this regard, its results were compared with those of widely used adhesives, such as urea-formaldehyde (UF). Pine wood particles were used, and epoxy resin was applied as a binder in 5%, 10%, and 15% proportions. Panels were manufactured under pressing parameters of 5 N/mm2 for 10 min at 110 °C. Physical and mechanical properties of panels were evaluated using Brazilian, European, and American standards. The results showed that epoxy resin is potentially convenient for the particleboard industry, as the 15% trait panels met the P4 class criteria in the Brazilian and European standards and D-2 for the American code, and the 10% trait panels achieved the M-3i class for the American document. Although 5% adhesive was insufficient to envelop wood particles, these traits with greater percentages reached high enveloping ratings in the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) test, making epoxy resin viable for the panel industry as a potential alternative to formaldehyde-based adhesives. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wood Quality and Mechanical Properties: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Laboratory processes: (<b>a</b>) pine shavings; (<b>b</b>) wooden particle processing using knife mill; and (<b>c</b>) epoxy resin and hardener.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Laboratory processes: (<b>a</b>) weighing of pinewood used for the granulometric test; (<b>b</b>) granulometric test of the particles; and (<b>c</b>) determination of specific mass of pinewood particles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Laboratory processes: (<b>a</b>) air-dried particles; and (<b>b</b>) moisture content test of the particles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Laboratory processes: (<b>a</b>) resin weighing; (<b>b</b>) resin homogenization with the hardener; (<b>c</b>) resin application to the particles; (<b>d</b>) particle homogenization in a mechanical rotative mixer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Laboratory processes: (<b>a</b>) particles before pressing; (<b>b</b>) temperature control; and (<b>c</b>) panels after pressing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Laboratory processes related to specimens: (<b>a</b>) dimensioning with a digital caliper; (<b>b</b>) measurement with a caliper; and (<b>c</b>) samples submerged in deionized water.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Panel evaluation: (<b>a</b>) static bending test; (<b>b</b>) specimen after the static bending; (<b>c</b>) perpendicular tensile test; and (<b>d</b>) specimen after the perpendicular tensile test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Surface of the specimen from the 5EP mixture. (<b>b</b>) Surface of the specimen from the 10EP mixture. (<b>c</b>) Surface of the specimen from the 15EP mixture.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 2421 KiB  
Article
Antioxidant Particleboards Produced from Forest By-Products with Application in the Food Packaging Industry
by Raquel A. Fernandes, Nuno Ferreira, Sandro Lopes, Beatriz Freitas, Jorge Santos, Jorge M. Martins and Luisa H. Carvalho
Polymers 2025, 17(2), 216; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17020216 - 16 Jan 2025
Viewed by 547
Abstract
The food packaging industry is one of the fastest growing sectors of our economy, with a large contribution to environmental concerns due to the extensive use of fossil-derived materials. Combining wood-based materials, such as particleboards, with bio-adhesives may offer a great opportunity to [...] Read more.
The food packaging industry is one of the fastest growing sectors of our economy, with a large contribution to environmental concerns due to the extensive use of fossil-derived materials. Combining wood-based materials, such as particleboards, with bio-adhesives may offer a great opportunity to develop sustainable packaging solutions with active antioxidant properties. In the present work, a phenolic extract of poplar bark was produced and bio-adhesives were formulated using citric acid as a cross-linker. The impact of citric acid content on the chemical and bonding properties of bio-adhesives was evaluated. Additionally, the impact of the temperature of curing on their antioxidant capacity was also accessed. The bio-adhesives were applied in the production of particleboards, using poplar veneer particles as raw material. The composite materials exhibit high mechanical resistance, fulfilling the requirement of PB type P1, with remarkable antioxidant activity, opening a possibility to be employed in an active packaging solution. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biobased and Biodegradable Polymers)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Photograph of CA_<span class="html-italic">X</span> adhesives (X = 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100). (<b>b</b>) Effect of citric acid amount (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100%) on viscosity and pH. Samples subscripted by * are significantly different in terms of viscosity and pH at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Solubility in water of the CA_<span class="html-italic">X</span> adhesives (<span class="html-italic">X</span> = 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100). Samples subscripted by different letters are significantly different in terms of temperature at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effect of pressing temperature on shear strength of CA_<span class="html-italic">X</span> bio-adhesives (X = 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Relation between the insoluble fraction of CA_<span class="html-italic">X</span> adhesives (<span class="html-italic">X</span> = 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100) and shear strength at a specific temperature of curing, namely 80 °C (triangle), 120 °C (circle), 160 °C (square), and 200 °C (diamond).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Antioxidant activity measured by FRAP of the water-soluble fraction of the CA_<span class="html-italic">X</span> adhesives (<span class="html-italic">X</span> = 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100). Samples subscripted by different letters are significantly different in terms of temperature at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) FTIR spectra of CA_<span class="html-italic">X</span> bio-adhesives (X = 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100). FTIR peak area (%) of characteristic bands of (<b>b</b>) CA_0, (<b>c</b>) CA_25, (<b>d</b>) CA_50, (<b>e</b>) CA_75, and (<b>f</b>) CA_100. Bars subscripted by different letters are significantly different (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) in terms of temperature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Photograph of the composite panels produced using the CA_<span class="html-italic">X</span> bio-adhesives (<span class="html-italic">X</span> = 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Effect of thickness and citric acid content on the antioxidant activity of PBCA_X composite panels and standard UF particleboard. Different letters above columns refer to significantly different values at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 depending on the thickness (capital letters—8 mm and lowercase letters—4 mm particleboards). (<b>b</b>) Impact of pressing temperature on the antioxidant activity of PBCA_50 composite panel. * refers to significantly different columns at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 3708 KiB  
Article
Exploitation of Perennial Plant Biomass for Particleboards Designed for Insulation Applications
by Danuta Martyniak, Marta Pędzik, Grzegorz Żurek, Karol Tomczak, Ryszard Gąsiorowski, Magdalena Komorowicz and Dominika Janiszewska-Latterini
Materials 2025, 18(2), 352; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020352 - 14 Jan 2025
Viewed by 573
Abstract
With rising demand for wood products and reduced wood harvesting due to the European Green Deal, alternative lignocellulosic materials for insulation are necessary. In this work, we manufactured reference particleboard from industrial particles and fifteen different board variants from alternative lignocellulosic plants material, [...] Read more.
With rising demand for wood products and reduced wood harvesting due to the European Green Deal, alternative lignocellulosic materials for insulation are necessary. In this work, we manufactured reference particleboard from industrial particles and fifteen different board variants from alternative lignocellulosic plants material, i.e., five types of perennial plant biomass in three substitutions: 30, 50 and 75% of their share in the board with a nominal density of 250 kg/m3. Within the analysis of manufactured boards, the mechanical, chemical and thermal properties were investigated—internal bond, formaldehyde emissions, thermal insulation, heat transfer coefficient and thermal conductivity. In the case of thermal conductivity, the most promising results from a practical point of view (W/mK < 0.07) were obtained with Sida hermaphrodita and Miscanthus, achieving the best results at 50% substitution. The lowest formaldehyde emissions were recorded for boards with Panicum virgatum and Miscanthus, highlighting their positive environmental performance. In terms of mechanical properties, the highest internal bond was noticed in particleboards with a 30% substitution of Spartina pectinata and Miscanthus. Research findings confirm the potential of perennial plants as a sustainable source of raw materials for insulation panel manufacturing. Despite needing improvements in mechanical properties, most notably internal bond strength, these plants offer an ecologically responsible solution aligned with global construction trends, thus lessening reliance on traditional wood products. Thus, long-term benefits may be realized through the strategic combination of diverse raw materials within a single particleboard. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The stems of perennial plants and industrial wood particles before and after shredding.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Chemical composition of tested perennial plants.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Content of mineral substances (ash) and extractives (solvent: ethanol, cold water, cold and hot water together) in tested perennial plants.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Fractional composition of industrial wood particles and particles of five types of perennial plant biomass.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The poured bulk density of the industrial wood and perennial plant particles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The effect of the proportion of different types of perennial plants on the value of the thermal conductivity coefficient.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effect of the proportion of different perennial plants on the value of the heat transfer coefficient.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Effect of the proportion of different perennial plants on the value of the internal bond.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 6598 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Four Methods to Determine the Degree of Cure of Melamine-Based Direct Pressed Laminates on Particleboards: Two Improved UV Absorption Methods, the Kiton Test, and Near Infrared Spectroscopy
by Mark Meder, Carsten Mai and Dirk Lukowsky
Materials 2025, 18(1), 117; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18010117 - 30 Dec 2024
Viewed by 680
Abstract
Despite its importance, the determination of the degree of cure of melamine-based laminates often relies on tests with limited accuracy and validity. Undercured surfaces may suffer insufficient resistance to scratching and heat as well as substandard surface quality. Overcured melamine surfaces tend to [...] Read more.
Despite its importance, the determination of the degree of cure of melamine-based laminates often relies on tests with limited accuracy and validity. Undercured surfaces may suffer insufficient resistance to scratching and heat as well as substandard surface quality. Overcured melamine surfaces tend to crack and entail the inefficient utilization of the press—the panels could have been pressed for a shorter time. Four methods to determine the degree of cure of a melamine resin coating under industrial conditions were compared: the Kiton test, the most common method in industry, Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIR) as a modern technique that allows for inline-measurements, and two novel hydrolysis methods. Each test was conducted on the same 18 panels. Each panel differed in its resin system or its degree of cure, which was adjusted by varying the pressing duration and temperature. The four methods tested were all capable of determining the degree of cure to some extent, but their applicability, the delay between the curing of the melamine resin at the final stage of production and the availability of results, and the investment and workload differ greatly. Determining the critical overcure turned out to be the major challenge. Differentiation between slight overcure, which did not affect the cracking resistance, and severe overcure, which produced surfaces with a high tendency to cracking, was possible using the NIR-based method and the two novel hydrolysis methods but not with the widely used Kiton test. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Graphical overview of the methods used: Two sets of melamine-impregnated papers were hot pressed using three pressing times and three temperatures. The degree of cure was tested with four methods. Additionally, the cracking resistance of the cured papers was assessed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Cracking susceptibility (cumulative crack length in mm) resulting from the different pressing temperatures and durations of the 18 panels examined. The higher the value (also indicated by the increasing blue staining of the background squares), the lower the panel’s resistance to cracking.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Assembly for surface hydrolysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Samples with slow-curing (<b>left</b>) and fast-curing resin (<b>right</b>) after the Kiton test. The shapes of the stained areas differ because round as well as rectangle watch glasses were used.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Reflected light microscopic images of a melamine surface after the Kiton test. The red longish threads are stained near-surface fibers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>NIR absorption values at 1420 nm for the slow-curing resin (<b>left</b>) and the fast-curing resin (<b>right</b>). The red dots mark the production parameters of the boards. The numbers next to the dots represent the number of tests performed with said board. The scales of the axes are kept constant. Therefore, the graph for the fast-curing resin is narrower than the graph for the slow-curing resin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Mass of hydrolyzed melamine [µg] (via surface hydrolysis) for the slow-curing resin (<b>left</b>) and the fast-curing resin (<b>right</b>). The red dots represent the production parameters of the boards. The numbers next to the dots represent the number of tests performed with said board.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Mass of hydrolyzed melamine [µg] (via powder hydrolysis) for the slow-curing resin (<b>left</b>) and the fast-curing resin (<b>right</b>). The red dots mark the production parameters of the boards. The numbers next to the dots represent the number of tests performed with said board.</p>
Full article ">
31 pages, 22480 KiB  
Article
Durability of Wood–Cement Composites with Modified Composition by Limestone and Stabilised Spruce Chips
by Tomáš Melichar, Amos Dufka, Karel Dvořák, Patrik Bayer, Silvestr Vasas, Iveta Novakova, Ivana Schwarzova and Jiří Bydžovský
Materials 2024, 17(24), 6300; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17246300 - 23 Dec 2024
Viewed by 498
Abstract
Limestone (LS) and stabilised secondary spruce chips (SCs) utilisation in wood–cement composites is still an unexplored area. Therefore, the main objective of the research presented here is the assessment of the long-term behaviour of cement-bonded particleboards (CBPs) modified by LS and SCs. Cement [...] Read more.
Limestone (LS) and stabilised secondary spruce chips (SCs) utilisation in wood–cement composites is still an unexplored area. Therefore, the main objective of the research presented here is the assessment of the long-term behaviour of cement-bonded particleboards (CBPs) modified by LS and SCs. Cement (CE) was replaced by 10% of LS, and spruce chips by 7% of SCs. The test specimens were stored in a laboratory and exterior environment (Middle Europe) for up to 2 years. The density, strength, and modulus of elasticity were evaluated after 28 days, and then in 6-month periods. The hygroscopicity was analysed separately. The mineralogical composition and microstructure were analysed due to possible LS participation during hydration. SC synergic behaviour in CBPs was also studied. After 2 years, the microstructure of the CBP was more compact, and denser. Strong carbonatation contributes to the improvement of CBP properties. The products of carbonatation were present in both the matrix and wood chips. The hydration of the matrix was almost finished. LS has a positive effect on the matrix microstructure development. LS acts both as an active component participating in the formation of the cement matrix structure and as an inert microfiller, synergic with hydration products. SCs have a positive effect on the hygroscopic behaviour of CBPs and slightly negative effect on the tensile strength. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Production scheme of CIDEM Hranice, a.s., particleboards: 1—spilling; 2—preparation of mixture; 3—layering of boards; 4—pressing; 5—drying; 6—formatting; 7—storage; and 8—transport (highlighted cuttings by-product from formatting particleboards) [<a href="#B30-materials-17-06300" class="html-bibr">30</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Particle size and distribution: (<b>a</b>) cement CEM II/A-S 42.5 R and limestone VMV15-F; (<b>b</b>) primary spruce chips and secondary stabilised chips 0.5–2 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Detail of structure (Keyence VHX-950F optical microscope): (<b>a</b>) secondary chips 0.5–1 mm; (<b>b</b>) secondary chips 1–2 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Detail of structure (Tescan MIRA3 XMU scanning electron microscope): (<b>a</b>) finely ground limestone; (<b>b</b>) finely ground limestone; (<b>c</b>) secondary chips 0.5–1 mm; (<b>d</b>) secondary chips 1–2 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Production of cement-bonded particleboards—CIDEM Hranice, a.s.: (<b>a</b>) layered mixture on a steel pad; (<b>b</b>) layering of individual steel plates with the mixture over each other prior to pressing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Production of cement-bonded particleboards CIDEM Hranice, a.s.: board after pressing and thermal treatment, before formatting and grinding.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Exposure of test specimens in real climatic conditions over the course of 2 years (Central Europe, Czech Republic): (<b>a</b>) summer 2022; (<b>b</b>) winter 2023/2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Exposure of test specimens in real climatic conditions over the course of 2 years: (<b>a</b>) progression of average daily temperatures; (<b>b</b>) progressions of average daily air humidity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Mechanical parameters of tested CBP: (<b>a</b>) density; (<b>b</b>) bending strength (exposure: /R—laboratory environment and /E—real climatic conditions).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Mechanical parameters of tested CBP: (<b>a</b>) modulus of elasticity in bending; (<b>b</b>) tensile strength perpendicular to the plane of the board (exposure: /R—laboratory environment and /E—real climatic conditions).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Sorption isotherms with hysteresis effect of tested CBP: (<b>a</b>) linear change; (<b>b</b>) thickness (lateral) change; (<b>c</b>) mass change; and (<b>d</b>) volume change (all specimens were stored under laboratory conditions).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Phase composition of reference wood–cement composite CBP-R—standard industry mixture of company CIDEM Hranice, a.s. (R28, R365, and R730—laboratory environment after 28 days, 365 days, and 730 days, E365 and E730—real climate of Czechia after 365 days and 730 days; E—ettringite, P—portlandite, C—calcite, and L—larnite).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Phase composition of modified wood–cement composite CBP-L—industry mixture modified by limestone (R28, R365, and R730—laboratory environment after 28 days, 365 days, and 730 days, E365 and E730—real climate of Czechia after 365 days and 730 days; E—ettringite, P—portlandite, C—calcite, and L—larnite).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Phase composition of modified wood–cement composite CBP-R—industry mixture modified by limestone and secondary chips (R28, R365, and R730—laboratory environment after 28 days, 365 days, and 730 days, E365 and E730—real climate of Czechia after 365 days and 730 days; E—ettringite, P—portlandite, C—calcite, and L—larnite).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Detail of structure (Keyence VHX-950F optical microscope)—reference boards CBP-R after 730 days ageing in laboratory environment: (<b>a</b>) sidewall view, yellow arrow—direction of the board pressing; (<b>b</b>) face-side view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Detail of structure (Keyence VHX-950F optical microscope)—reference boards CBP-R after 730 days ageing in external climatic environment: (<b>a</b>) sidewall view, yellow arrow—direction of the board pressing; (<b>b</b>) face-side view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Detail of structure (Keyence VHX-950F optical microscope)—reference boards CBP-L after 730 days ageing in laboratory environment: (<b>a</b>) sidewall view, yellow arrow—direction of the board pressing; (<b>b</b>) face-side view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Detail of structure (Keyence VHX-950F optical microscope)—reference boards CBP-L after 730 days ageing in external climatic environment: (<b>a</b>) sidewall view, yellow arrow—direction of the board pressing; (<b>b</b>) face-side view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Detail of structure (Tescan MIRA3 XMU scanning electron microscope)—reference boards CBP-R after 730 days ageing in laboratory environment: (<b>a</b>) cement matrix, IZT of matrix and chip; (<b>b</b>) detail of compact matrix—CASH phases with sulphur (yellow-highlighted); (<b>c</b>) matrix CASH phases with sulphur (yellow-highlighted) and portlandite (orange-highlighted); and (<b>d</b>) EDX spectrum of portlandite area—orange point “×” (see <a href="#materials-17-06300-f019" class="html-fig">Figure 19</a>c).</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Detail of structure (Tescan MIRA3 XMU scanning electron microscope)—reference boards CBP-R after 730 days exposed to real climatic conditions: (<b>a</b>) cement matrix, IZT of matrix and chip, and hydration products in spruce chip (green-highlighted); (<b>b</b>) portlandite (orange-highlighted); (<b>c</b>) detail of calcite (carbonation product); and (<b>d</b>) EDX spectrum of calcite—yellow point “×” (see <a href="#materials-17-06300-f020" class="html-fig">Figure 20</a>c).</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Detail of structure (Tescan MIRA3 XMU scanning electron microscope)—modified boards CBP-L after 730 days ageing in laboratory environment: (<b>a</b>) cement matrix, IZT of matrix and chip; (<b>b</b>) detail of LS grain in matrix (yellow-highlighted) and portlandite (orange-highlighted); (<b>c</b>) ITZ of matrix and LS grain in detail; and (<b>d</b>) EDX spectrum of LS grain—yellow point “×” (see <a href="#materials-17-06300-f021" class="html-fig">Figure 21</a>b).</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Detail of structure (Tescan MIRA3 XMU scanning electron microscope)—modified boards CBP-L after 730 days ageing in laboratory environment: (<b>a</b>) cement matrix, IZT of matrix and chip; (<b>b</b>) detail of LS grain in matrix (yellow-highlighted); (<b>c</b>) carbonation products and LS grain (yellow-highlighted); and (<b>d</b>) detail of carbonation products within spruce chip.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 4124 KiB  
Article
Intelligent Detection Method for Surface Defects of Particleboard Based on Super-Resolution Reconstruction
by Haiyan Zhou, Haifei Xia, Chenlong Fan, Tianxiang Lan, Ying Liu, Yutu Yang, Yinxi Shen and Wei Yu
Forests 2024, 15(12), 2196; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122196 - 13 Dec 2024
Viewed by 794
Abstract
To improve the intelligence level of particleboard inspection lines, machine vision and artificial intelligence technologies are combined to replace manual inspection with automatic detection. Aiming at the problem of missed detection and false detection on small defects due to the large surface width, [...] Read more.
To improve the intelligence level of particleboard inspection lines, machine vision and artificial intelligence technologies are combined to replace manual inspection with automatic detection. Aiming at the problem of missed detection and false detection on small defects due to the large surface width, complex texture and different surface defect shapes of particleboard, this paper introduces image super-resolution technology and proposes a super-resolution reconstruction model for particleboard images. Based on the Transformer network, this model incorporates an improved SRResNet (Super-Resolution Residual Network) backbone network in the deep feature extraction module to extract deep texture information. The shallow features extracted by conv 3 × 3 are then fused with features extracted by the Transformer, considering both local texture features and global feature information. This enhances image quality and makes defect details clearer. Through comparison with the traditional bicubic B-spline interpolation method, ESRGAN (Enhanced Super-Resolution Generative Adversarial Network), and SwinIR (Image Restoration Using Swin Transformer), the effectiveness of the particleboard super-resolution reconstruction model is verified using objective evaluation metrics including PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS, demonstrating its ability to produce higher-quality images with more details and better visual characteristics. Finally, using the YOLOv8 model to compare defect detection rates between super-resolution images and low-resolution images, the mAP can reach 96.5%, which is 25.6% higher than the low-resolution image recognition rate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Wood Science and Forest Products)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Particleboard image acquisition system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Full-size particleboard image (the circles in the figure are defects).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Defect images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Particleboard image super-resolution model based on Transformer network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Particleboard reconstruction image comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>P-R curves in test set.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Confusion matrix in test set.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Detection results.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 3770 KiB  
Article
Incorporating Birch Bark Suberinic Acid Residue Powder into Structural Particleboards: Exploring Fractional Influence on Material Properties in Circular Economy Framework
by Anita Wronka and Grzegorz Kowaluk
Materials 2024, 17(23), 5750; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17235750 - 24 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 646
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of suberic acid residue (SAR) additions on structural single-layer particleboard (like the P5 type, according to EN 312) properties, specifically the water absorption (WA), thickness swelling (TS), modulus of rupture (MOR), modulus of elasticity (MOE), screw withdrawal resistance [...] Read more.
This study investigates the effects of suberic acid residue (SAR) additions on structural single-layer particleboard (like the P5 type, according to EN 312) properties, specifically the water absorption (WA), thickness swelling (TS), modulus of rupture (MOR), modulus of elasticity (MOE), screw withdrawal resistance (SWR), and internal bond (IB) strength. The results indicate that finer SAR fractions (1/0.25 and 2/1) reduce the WA after 2 h of soaking, while larger fractions increase the WA after 24 h, with only the smallest fraction meeting the TS standards. The MOR values (18.5–19.6 N mm−2) and MOE (3627–3811 N mm−2) remain largely unaffected by SAR additions, while the SWR shows minimal variation across various SAR fractions (203–209 N mm−1). The IB strength improves with SAR additions, peaking at 2.10 N mm−2 for the 5/2 fraction, though slightly decreasing with the largest fraction (8/5). A density analysis reveals an increased surface density with finer SAR fractions, benefiting the surface strength but reducing the core uniformity with larger fractions. These findings suggest that SAR-enhanced particleboards could be valuable in applications requiring moisture resistance, such as bathrooms, kitchens, and exterior cladding. Further research should explore optimizing the SAR concentration, combining it with hydrophobic agents, and examining its long-term stability under varying environmental conditions to enhance its structural performance for sustainable building applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Biomass-Based Materials and Their Applications)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>The water absorption of the structural particleboard produced with the addition of various fractions of SAR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The thickness swelling of the structural particleboard produced with the addition of various fractions of SAR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>SAR water absorption test for different fractions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Influence of various amounts of SAR addition on MOR of produced structural particleboard.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Influence of various amounts of SAR additions on MOE of produced structural particleboard.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The screw withdrawal resistance of the structural particleboard produced with the various amounts of SAR additions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The internal bond of the structural particleboard produced with the various amounts of SAR additions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>View of samples with 8/5 SAR fraction after IB testing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Density profiles of tested structural particleboard.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 3658 KiB  
Article
The Effect of Particles from Rotten Spruce Logs and Recycled Wooden Composites on Changes in the Bio-Resistance of Three-Layer Particleboards Against the Decaying Fungus Coniophora puteana and Mixture of Moulds
by Zuzana Vidholdová, Viktória Satinová and Ladislav Reinprecht
Forests 2024, 15(11), 2043; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15112043 - 19 Nov 2024
Viewed by 741
Abstract
Wood-based particleboards (PBs) are widely used in construction and interior applications, yet their durability, particularly against biological degradation, remains a challenge. Recycling wood and incorporating degraded particles from rotted wood can potentially enhance PB sustainability and align with circular bioeconomy principles. This study [...] Read more.
Wood-based particleboards (PBs) are widely used in construction and interior applications, yet their durability, particularly against biological degradation, remains a challenge. Recycling wood and incorporating degraded particles from rotted wood can potentially enhance PB sustainability and align with circular bioeconomy principles. This study investigates the biological resistance of the three-layer, laboratory-prepared PBs with varied amounts of particles, from sound spruce wood to particles, and from spruce logs attacked by brown- or white rot, respectively, to particles from recycled wooden composites of laminated particleboards (LPBs) or blockboards (BBs), i.e., 100:0, 80:20, 50:50, and 0:100. The bio-resistance of PBs was evaluated against the brown-rot fungus Coniophora puteana, as well as against a mixture of moulds’ “microscopic fungi”, such as Aspergillus versicolor BAM 8, Aspergillus niger BAM 122, Penicillium purpurogenum BAM 24, Stachybotrys chartarum BAM 32, and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa BAM 571. PBs containing particles from brown-rotten wood or from recycled wood composites, particularly LPBs, had a partly enhanced decay resistance, but their mass loss was nevertheless more than 30%. On the other hand, the mould resistance of all variants of PBs, evaluated in the 21st day, was very poor, with the highest mould growth activity (MGA = 4). These findings suggested that some types of rotten and recycled wood particles can improve the biological resistance of PBs; however, their effectiveness is influenced by the type of wood degradation and the source of recycled materials. Further, the results highlight the need for improved biocidal, chemical, or thermal modifications of wood particles to enhance the overall biological durability of PBs for specific uses. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Display of PB samples 50 mm × 50 mm × 16 mm: (<b>a</b>) PB-BR: Manufactured from brown-rotten particles; (<b>b</b>) PB-WR: manufactured from white-rotten particles; (<b>c</b>) PB-LPB: manufactured from recycled laminated PB particles; and (<b>d</b>) PB-BB: manufactured from recycled blockboard particles. Amount of rotten/recycled particles in PB—w<sub>R</sub> (%): (Ⅰ) Control = 0%, (Ⅱ) 20%, (Ⅲ) 50%, and (Ⅳ) = 100%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Display of PB and virulence wood samples in Kolle flasks: (<b>a</b>) before test initiation; (<b>b</b>) after 16 weeks of mycological testing with <span class="html-italic">Coniophora puteana</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Display of mould growth activity (MGA) on the top PB surface and control Norway spruce wood (<span class="html-italic">P. abies</span> Karst. L.) samples in Petri dishes during testing: (<b>a</b>) start of the mould test; (<b>b</b>) day 7; (<b>c</b>) day 14; (<b>d</b>) day 21. PB with 100% recycled BB particles (PB 100 BB) is shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Mass loss—Δm [%] (<b>a</b>) and moisture content—w<sub>decayed</sub> [%] (<b>b</b>) of PBs containing different amounts of brown-rot particles after being subjected to the brown-rot fungus <span class="html-italic">Coniophora puteana</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Mass loss—Δm [%] (<b>a</b>) and moisture content—w<sub>decayed</sub> [%] (<b>b</b>) of PBs containing different amount of white-rotten particles after being subjected to the brown-rot fungus <span class="html-italic">Coniophora puteana</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Mass loss—Δm [%] (<b>a</b>) and moisture content—w<sub>decayed</sub> [%] (<b>b</b>) of PBs containing different amount of recycled particles from laminated PBs after being subjected to the brown-rot fungus <span class="html-italic">Coniophora puteana</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Mass loss—Δm [%] (<b>a</b>) and moisture content—w<sub>decayed</sub> [%] (<b>b</b>) of PBs containing different amount of recycled particles from blockboards after their attack by the brown-rot fungus <span class="html-italic">Coniophora puteana</span>.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 2082 KiB  
Review
Strength, Durability, and Aesthetics of Corner Joints and Edge Banding in Furniture Design: A Review
by Zoran Vlaović, Tomislav Gržan, Ivica Župčić, Danijela Domljan and Goran Mihulja
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(22), 10285; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210285 - 8 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1227
Abstract
Corner joints and edge banding are essential components that significantly impact the strength, durability, and aesthetic appeal of particleboard furniture. This review examines the critical role of edge banding in enhancing the performance of corner joints, which are fundamental to the overall quality [...] Read more.
Corner joints and edge banding are essential components that significantly impact the strength, durability, and aesthetic appeal of particleboard furniture. This review examines the critical role of edge banding in enhancing the performance of corner joints, which are fundamental to the overall quality of panel furniture. A targeted literature search was conducted across key databases, including the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC), Scopus, and Google Scholar, focusing on scientific resources in the technical and biotechnical sciences. The selection of joint types, materials, and construction methods can substantially influence both the structural integrity and visual design of the furniture. Well-designed corner joints improve durability and longevity by ensuring that furniture can withstand various forces and loads without failure or deformation. These joints enhance the aesthetics of furniture by providing seamless and visually appealing connections between different elements. Edge banding is vital for reinforcing corner joint strength, as different materials exhibit varying degrees of resistance to impact, scratches, and abrasion, thereby safeguarding furniture surfaces. Also, edge banding contributes to the furniture’s longevity, ensuring durability during use as well as through disassembly and transport during remodeling or relocation. This review aims to consolidate existing knowledge and establish parameters for future research on the quality and performance of corner joints and edge bands in particleboard furniture. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Test samples and appropriate devices for various methods to evaluate the edge bonding quality: (<b>a</b>) pull-off test according to EN 311:2014 [<a href="#B24-applsci-14-10285" class="html-bibr">24</a>] adapted to EN ISO 4624:2017 [<a href="#B21-applsci-14-10285" class="html-bibr">21</a>]; (<b>b</b>) adhesion test using EN 311:2004 [<a href="#B24-applsci-14-10285" class="html-bibr">24</a>] to evaluate surface soundness and adhesion of edge banding; (<b>c</b>) peeling test in line according to EN 28510-1:2014 [<a href="#B23-applsci-14-10285" class="html-bibr">23</a>]; (<b>d</b>) peeling test for curved edges according to Chinese standard QB/T3655 [<a href="#B27-applsci-14-10285" class="html-bibr">27</a>] ((<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) were reprinted from Hlavatý and Tesařová [<a href="#B28-applsci-14-10285" class="html-bibr">28</a>], <a href="#applsci-14-10285-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>d was reprinted from Lyu et al. [<a href="#B26-applsci-14-10285" class="html-bibr">26</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic view of laser edge band gluing (<b>a</b>) (reprinted from Jansen et al. [<a href="#B7-applsci-14-10285" class="html-bibr">7</a>], copyright (2009), with permission from Springer) and view of the laser-glue unit on the edge banding machine (<b>b</b>) (Photo by G. Mihulja).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Bonding strength of edge bands tested (<b>a</b>) and water absorption through glued joints (<b>b</b>) (reprinted from Jansen et al. [<a href="#B7-applsci-14-10285" class="html-bibr">7</a>], copyright (2009), with permission from Springer).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Typical configuration (<b>a</b>) and detail (<b>b</b>) of L-type corner joints used in the tests (in mm) (reprinted from Tankut and Tankut [<a href="#B3-applsci-14-10285" class="html-bibr">3</a>], copyright (2010), with permission from Elsevier).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Overview map of quality parameters with future research directions. Designed using Canva.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 2199 KiB  
Article
Sustainable Panels from Cocoa (Theobroma cacao) Wood Wastes Bonded with Cassava starch and Urea–Formaldehyde
by Prosper Mensah, Rafael Rodolfo de Melo, Francis Kofi Bih, Stephen Jobson Mitchual, Alexandre Santos Pimenta, Talita Dantas Pedrosa and Edgley Alves de Oliveira Paula
J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8(11), 444; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8110444 - 1 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1017
Abstract
The demand for innovative products from renewable sources has motivated research development to create new sustainable materials. Cassava starch (CS) has been widely used for bonding and composing different types of products. Particleboards produced from cocoa (Theobroma cacao), wood wastes, and [...] Read more.
The demand for innovative products from renewable sources has motivated research development to create new sustainable materials. Cassava starch (CS) has been widely used for bonding and composing different types of products. Particleboards produced from cocoa (Theobroma cacao), wood wastes, and CS adhesives can be an environmentally correct and economically profitable alternative to replacing traditional commercial panels. This study aimed to manufacture particleboards made with wood waste extracted from the stem of Theobroma cacao. The panels were bonded with different proportions of CS and urea–formaldehyde (UF) adhesives, and their physical–mechanical properties were determined. To manufacture the panels, cocoa wood wastes were mixed with the adhesive in ratios of 90:10, 70:30, and 50%:50% (CS/UF). Two control treatments were bonded with 100% of both adhesives. The resulting particleboards were employed as a reference to compare properties. The manufacturing process was carried out by cold pressing. Apparent density, water absorption, thickness swelling, and static bending strength were found for all panels. The data obtained were subjected to Levene’s homogeneity test, Shapiro–Wilk’s normality test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey’s mean test. The results showed that the highest density value was 497.0 kg m−3, corresponding to the treatment composed of cocoa wood wastes bonded with 100% CS adhesive. The water absorption and thickness swelling results after a 24 h immersion showed that the panel formed using cocoa wood wastes and 100% UF had the lowest values, 22.1 and 11.2%. The highest bending strength value was 13.1 MPa for the experimental treatment composed of cocoa wood residue and 100% UF. However, this result did not differ statistically from the treatment (50–50). Therefore, cocoa wood waste combined with adhesive CS may be a sustainable alternative for producing particleboards. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic representation of the manufacturing sequence of particleboards produced with <span class="html-italic">Theobroma cacao</span> wood wastes bonded with <span class="html-italic">Cassava starch</span> (CS) and urea–formaldehyde (UF) adhesives.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Proportions of <span class="html-italic">Cassava starch</span> (CS) and urea–formaldehyde (UF) adhesives for bonding particleboards produced with <span class="html-italic">Theobroma cacao</span> wood wastes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Apparent density of particleboards produced with <span class="html-italic">Theobroma cacao</span> wood wastes bonded with different blends of <span class="html-italic">Cassava starch</span> (CS) and Urea–formaldehyde (UF) adhesives. Means followed by different letters are statistically dissimilar, determined the Tukey test at 95% probability.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Water absorption (<b>a</b>) and thickness swelling (<b>b</b>) of panels produced with <span class="html-italic">Theobroma cacao</span> wood particles bonded with different blends of <span class="html-italic">Cassava starch</span> (CS) and urea–formaldehyde (UF) adhesives. Means followed by different letters are statistically dissimilar, determined by the Tukey test at 95% probability.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Modulus of rupture (<b>a</b>) and elasticity (<b>b</b>) for panels produced with <span class="html-italic">Theobroma cacao</span> wood wastes bonded with <span class="html-italic">Cassava starch</span> (CS) and urea–formaldehyde (UF) adhesives. Means followed by different letters are statistically dissimilar, determined the Tukey test at 95% probability.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Janka hardness of particleboards produced with <span class="html-italic">Theobroma cacao</span> wood wastes bonded with <span class="html-italic">Cassava starch</span> (CS) and urea–formaldehyde (UF) adhesives. Means followed by different letters are statistically dissimilar, determined the Tukey test at 95% probability.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 2509 KiB  
Article
Leveraging Spruce Bark Particle Morphology for Enhanced Internal Bonding in Particleboard Production
by Jakob Gößwald, Marius Cătălin Barbu, Eugenia Mariana Tudor and Pavel Král
Polymers 2024, 16(21), 2988; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16212988 - 25 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1047
Abstract
The continuous rise in global demand for wood products has led to an increase in prices and a surge in research into alternative resources. As a byproduct of the timber industry, bark has emerged as a promising supplement in particleboard (PB) production. However, [...] Read more.
The continuous rise in global demand for wood products has led to an increase in prices and a surge in research into alternative resources. As a byproduct of the timber industry, bark has emerged as a promising supplement in particleboard (PB) production. However, its anatomical structure, the presence of extractives, and its inferior mechanical properties complicate the production process, which have not yet been fully overcome at a commercial scale. This study proposes a paradigm shift, advocating for separate and specialized bark constituent processing in a wet state. Three bark-based raw materials—namely, outer bark particles, bark fiber clumps, and bark fibers—were investigated under varying wood content scenarios. PBs with a target density of 0.7 g/cm3 and a thickness of 16 mm were produced using mixtures of these bark-based materials and wood particles in different ratios bonded with a urea–formaldehyde adhesive. The results demonstrated that these bark constituents exhibit distinct properties that can be optimized through tailored processing techniques. Compared to bark fibers, outer bark particles displayed about 40% lower water absorption and thickness swelling. However, bark fibers improved the internal bond by about 50% due to their favorable morphology compared to outer bark. These findings highlight the potential of bark as a valuable resource for particleboard production and pave the way for its efficient utilization through specialized processing strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biobased and Biodegradable Polymers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Raw material: materials F (bark fibers, <b>left</b>), FK (bark fiber clumps, <b>middle</b>), and B (outer bark, <b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Sample images from all tested materials according to DoE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Box plot of density by group of bark-based particleboards.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Boxplot of internal bond (IB) by group of bark-based particleboards, highlighting the symmetry of the boxes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Correlation towards level by property corrected for density.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop