[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (265)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = multiple meteorological variables

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
24 pages, 8969 KiB  
Article
Integrating Climate Data and Remote Sensing for Maize and Wheat Yield Modelling in Ethiopia’s Key Agricultural Region
by Asfaw Kebede Kassa, Hongwei Zeng, Bingfang Wu, Miao Zhang, Kibebew Kibret Tsehai, Xingli Qin and Tesfay G. Gebremicael
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(3), 491; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17030491 - 30 Jan 2025
Viewed by 316
Abstract
Traditional methods for crop data collection are labor-intensive, inefficient and, more costly compared to remote sensing (RS) techniques. This study aims to identify key climatic variables influencing maize and wheat yields and develop predictive models while also evaluating the performance of the CropWatch [...] Read more.
Traditional methods for crop data collection are labor-intensive, inefficient and, more costly compared to remote sensing (RS) techniques. This study aims to identify key climatic variables influencing maize and wheat yields and develop predictive models while also evaluating the performance of the CropWatch cloud yield prediction model (CW_YPM) in major agricultural regions of Ethiopia. Climate data from 54 meteorological stations spanning 2000–2021 were analyzed. RS data, including NDVI from MODIS at 250 m resolution, agroecological zones, and observed crop yield data, were utilized for model prediction and validation. Correlation analysis and a stepwise modeling approach with multiple regression models were applied. The results revealed regional variations in the effects of climatic parameters on yields, with vapor pressure deficits showing negative correlations and rainfall exhibiting positive correlations. Non-linear models generally outperformed linear models in yield prediction—using both climate-only (CO) and combined climate-NDVI data. The best CO model for maize in the Horo Guduru area achieved an RMSE of 0.392 tons/ha, an R2 of 0.94, and an index of agreement (d) of 0.984. Incorporating NDVI improved accuracy, with the best maize model in the Illu Ababor area achieving an RMSE of 0.477 tons/ha, an R2 of 0.91, and d of 0.976. CW_YPM also performed effectively across the study area. This research highlights the value of integrating critical climatic variables with the NDVI to enhance crop yield forecasting in Ethiopia, thereby-supporting agricultural planning and food security initiatives. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location map of the study area, highlighting 13 selected administrative zones known for wheat and maize cultivation, along with the distribution of meteorological stations used in the study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Historical (2000–2021) climate variables (seasonal areal rainfall, average temperature (Tmean), and vapor pressure deficit) of selected administrative zones: (<b>a</b>) Arsi from wheat growing area (June to October) and (<b>b</b>) Illu Ababora from maize growing area (May to September).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Historical grain yield: (<b>a</b>) total grain production in regional states, Ethiopia (2019/2020 and 2020/2021; (<b>b</b>) maize and wheat yield data at selected administrative zones in Oromia region (2000 to 2021), Ethiopia [<a href="#B15-remotesensing-17-00491" class="html-bibr">15</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Historical grain yield: (<b>a</b>) total grain production in regional states, Ethiopia (2019/2020 and 2020/2021; (<b>b</b>) maize and wheat yield data at selected administrative zones in Oromia region (2000 to 2021), Ethiopia [<a href="#B15-remotesensing-17-00491" class="html-bibr">15</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>General methodology flow chart. (RF = rainfall).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Climate variables and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) correlation analysis with (<b>a</b>) maize and (<b>b</b>) wheat yield at selected administrative zones in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Residual plot for observed and model-fitted crop yield (maize and wheat) for all the study areas in the zonal administrations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Residual plot for observed and model-fitted crop yield (maize and wheat) for all the study areas in the zonal administrations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison between observed maize and wheat yield and their corresponding predicted yields generated by the top-performing “Climate only” and “Climate and NDVI” models across the study region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Scatter plots for predicted versus observed maize yield, “CO = Climate only and CaNDVI = Climate-NDVI variables” across the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Scatter plots for predicted versus observed maize yield, “CO = Climate only and CaNDVI = Climate-NDVI variables” across the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Scatter plots for predicted versus observed wheat yield, “CO = Climate only and CaNDVI = Climate-NDVI variables” across the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Scatter plots for predicted versus observed wheat yield, “CO = Climate only and CaNDVI = Climate-NDVI variables” across the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Spatial distribution of maize and wheat crop yield in 2021 in two zones predicted using CropWatch yield prediction model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of observed and predicted (CropWatch crop yield prediction model) yield for the period 2013 to 2021: (<b>a</b>) maize, Illu Ababora zone; (<b>b</b>) wheat, Bale zone.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 4610 KiB  
Article
The Application of Machine Learning to Model the Impacts of Extreme Climatic Events on the Productivity of Dwarf Green Coconut Trees in the Eastern Amazon
by Maryelle Kleyce M. Nery, Gabriel S. T. Fernandes, João V. de N. Pinto, Matheus L. Rua, Miguel Gabriel M. Santos, Luis Roberto T. Ribeiro, Leandro M. Navarro, Paulo Jorge O. P. de Souza and Glauco de S. Rolim
AgriEngineering 2025, 7(2), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7020033 - 30 Jan 2025
Viewed by 443
Abstract
The coconut crop (Cocos nucifera L.) is essential in humid tropical regions, contributing to the economy and food security. However, its perennial nature makes it sensitive to climate variability, particularly extreme events that affect productivity. This study evaluated the impacts of extreme [...] Read more.
The coconut crop (Cocos nucifera L.) is essential in humid tropical regions, contributing to the economy and food security. However, its perennial nature makes it sensitive to climate variability, particularly extreme events that affect productivity. This study evaluated the impacts of extreme climatic events on the productivity of dwarf green coconut in northeastern Pará, analyzing rainy (PC—December to July) and less rainy (PMC—August to November) periods between 2015 and 2023. Meteorological and experimental data were used, including extreme climate variables such as maximum temperature (HT) and precipitation (HEP), defined by the 90th percentiles, and low precipitation (LP, 10th percentile). Predictive models, such as Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Random Forest (RF), were developed. RF showed better performance, with an RMSE equivalent to 20% of the average productivity, while that of MLR exceeded 50%. However, RF struggled with generalization in the test set, likely due to overfitting. The inclusion of lagged productivity (productivity t-1) highlighted its significant influence. During the PC, extreme high precipitation (HEP) events and excessive water surplus (HE) occurring after the fifth month of inflorescence development contributed to increased productivity, whereas during the PMC, low-precipitation (LP) events led to productivity reductions. Notably, under certain circumstances, elevated precipitation can mitigate the negative impacts of low water availability. These findings underscore the need for adaptive management strategies to mitigate climatic impacts and promote stability in dwarf green coconut production. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A location map of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Development stages of the dwarf green coconut fruit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Climatic variability from 2014 to 2023, including (<b>A</b>) monthly maximum temperature (Tmax) in °C (solid blue line) and its historical average (dotted blue line), with extreme Tmax events represented by red lines (smoothed and dotted); (<b>B</b>) monthly sum of high precipitation (gray bars) and number of extreme events, differentiated into high precipitation (blue line) and low precipitation (red line); and (<b>C</b>) number of extreme water surplus events (blue area) and water deficit events (red area).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Seasonal and interannual variations in fruit productivity (fruits ha<sup>−1</sup>) from 2015 to 2023. The left panel shows the average monthly productivity over the years in a contour plot, with shades ranging from blue (low productivity) to red (high productivity). The right panel presents monthly boxplots of productivity, highlighting the median, dispersion, and outliers for each month.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The relationship between fruit productivity (fruits ha<sup>−1</sup>) and the frequency of extreme events of maximum temperature (Tmax), high precipitation (HP), and low precipitation (LP) during the rainy period (PC, blue) and less rainy period (PMC, orange). The density plots (violin plots) illustrate the variation in productivity across different ranges of extreme event frequencies, highlighting the differences in impacts between the two periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spearman correlation between coconut productivity during the region’s rainy period and meteorological variables over the months following inflorescence opening.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spearman correlation between coconut productivity during the region’s less rainy period and meteorological variables over the months following inflorescence opening.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>A comparison between the observed productivity and productivity estimated by the Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Random Forest (RF) models during the rainy period. Panel (<b>a</b>) represents the training set, while panel (<b>b</b>) represents the test set. The performance metrics include the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE), indicating the accuracy and robustness of the models in both stages. The red line represents the adjusted regression, and the black dotted line corresponds to the 1:1 line, indicating the ideal match between the observed and estimated values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>An analysis of the importance of input variables in the Random Forest model using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values for the rainy period. The chart displays the 10 most influential variables in predicting productivity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>A comparison between observed productivity and productivity estimated by the Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Random Forest (RF) models during the less rainy period. Panel (<b>a</b>) refers to the training set, while panel (<b>b</b>) represents the test set. Performance metrics include the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE). The red line indicates the regression fit, and the black dotted line represents the 1:1 line, symbolizing perfect alignment between the observed and estimated values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>An analysis of the importance of input variables in the Random Forest model for predicting productivity during the less rainy period, using SHAP (SHapley Additive Explanations) values.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 13298 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Dealiasing Biases on Bird and Insect Data Products of C-Band Weather Radars and Consequences for Aeroecological Applications
by Nadja Weisshaupt, Bent Harnist and Jarmo Koistinen
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(3), 436; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17030436 - 27 Jan 2025
Viewed by 361
Abstract
(1) The aliasing of radial velocities from weather radars is a known challenge in meteorology. It may also occur during bird migration if the unambiguous velocity threshold is below the birds’ ground speed. High variability in birds’ radial velocities and high flight speeds [...] Read more.
(1) The aliasing of radial velocities from weather radars is a known challenge in meteorology. It may also occur during bird migration if the unambiguous velocity threshold is below the birds’ ground speed. High variability in birds’ radial velocities and high flight speeds lead to multiple aliasing (folding) and challenge meteorological dealiasing approaches. Unfolded radial velocities are essential for calculating flight directions and speed and derived migration traffic rates for aeroecological applications. (2) We study the occurrence of aliasing in measurements of different pulse repetition frequencies (PRF) in C-band weather radars in bird and insect cases and test the efficiency of a dealiasing algorithm widely used in biological weather radar software. We use dual-PRF measurements as a reference to avoid the folding of radial velocities in quantitative and qualitative bird migration outputs. (3) The dealiasing algorithm performed poorly in single-PRF measurements during bird migration, though not in insect and precipitation cases. In contrast, dual-PRF velocities yielded proper flight speeds, flight directions and migration traffic rates. (4) The study unveils severe biases in aeroecological analyses of C-band weather radars from imperfectly dealiased single-PRF radial velocities. Dual-PRF measurements with appropriate dealiasing postprocessing offer a valid alternative to single PRF and should be preferred whenever available. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ecological Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Aliasing cases for PRFs of 570, 753, 1130 and 1507 Hz obtained with the Gaussian velocity simulator (see <a href="#app2-remotesensing-17-00436" class="html-app">Appendix A</a>) for a ground speed of 25 m s<sup>−1</sup>. Colours in the lower row indicate folding of velocity values: green: not folded; orange: folded once; red: folded twice.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Examples of dual-PRF radial velocities (blue dots) and their respective sine fit curve (red line) from the Kankaanpää radar as VAD: precipitation (<b>left</b>) with two outliers on 11 October 2023 7 am UTC, insects (<b>centre</b>) with several outliers on 5 June 2024 9 am UTC and birds (<b>right</b>) with partly aliased outlier sidebands on 29 April 2024 8 pm UTC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Location of the Finnish C-band weather radars used in the present study: Anjalankoski (ANJ), Kankaanpää (KAN), Kesälahti (KES), Korppoo (KOR), Kuopio (KUO), Nurmes (NUR), Petäjävesi (PET), Utajärvi (UTA), Vihti (VIH), Vimpeli (VIM).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Untreated radial velocities in five PRF modes on 5 October 2023 at elevation 0.7°. From left to right: 570, 753, 1130 and 1507 Hz and dual PRF. Aliasing can be seen in PRF 570, 753 and 1130, while PRF 1507 and dual PRF show almost unfolded radial velocities. In dual PRF, the outliers cause some inconsistencies in the texture of the velocity field.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Dual-PRF radial velocity with outlier sidebands and sine curve fits before (yellow curve) and after (blue curve) outlier aliasing correction in a case of bird migration in the height layer of 400–600 m on 29 April 2024 at 1 am UTC. Purple dots are non-aliased velocity measurements (regular and outliers) and the red ones aliased outliers shifted to the dealiased positions indicated by blue dots. The grey dotted line denotes the buffer of 35 m s<sup>−1</sup> set to define outliers to be shifted. The inset shows a histogram of the probabilities of the targets in each velocity bin being birds, as determined by the classification algorithm of [<a href="#B4-remotesensing-17-00436" class="html-bibr">4</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Examples of sine fitting in the height layer 400–600 m in single PRF 570 in birds and insects before (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and after (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) treatment by the HL dealiasing algorithm from the Kankaanpää radar on 14 September 2023 at 8 pm UTC and 17 September 2023 2 pm UTC, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Flight directions of birds of PRF 570, 753, 1130, 1507 untreated (orange) and dealiased (blue) by the HL dealiasing algorithm and dual PRF with outlier correction, with the arrows indicating the circular mean flight direction of the respective processing in autumn 2023 and spring 2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Differences (in degrees) between untreated and dealiased (by the HL algorithm) flight directions of insects of PRF 570, 753, 1130 and 1507 from autumn 2023 and spring 2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Simulations of dual-PRF radial velocities (blue dots) assuming a constant flight speed of 25 m s<sup>−1</sup> and a proportion of 15% (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), 29% (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) and 67% (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) of outliers with unaliased (left column) and aliased (assuming a Nyquist velocity of 48 m s<sup>−1</sup>; right column) sidebands and their effect on sine fit curves (red) and derived speeds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Fractions of bird (green, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 245), insect (red, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 95) and precipitation (blue, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 125) outliers in dual-PRF measurements with a threshold of 10 m s<sup>−1</sup> from the sine fit of the radial velocities in 200-m height layers between 0–1 km from 2023 and 2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Histograms (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 1572) of (<b>a</b>) relative frequency of flight speeds between 0–1 km from single PRF (vol2bird, red) and dual PRF FMI (green); (<b>b</b>) frequency of differences in flight speeds between vol2bird and the study approach (negative values indicating vol2bird &lt; FMI) in the study periods of 2022–2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Flight directions between 0–1 km obtained by single-PRF (vol2bird, left column) and dual PRF (FMI, right column) methodology for autumn 2022–2023 (upper row, vol2bird <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 1119, dual PRF <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 518) and spring 2024 (lower row, vol2bird <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 63, dual PRF <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 46) samples.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 2371 KiB  
Article
Predicting Asthma Hospitalizations from Climate and Air Pollution Data: A Machine Learning-Based Approach
by Jean Souza dos Reis, Rafaela Lisboa Costa, Fabricio Daniel dos Santos Silva, Ediclê Duarte Fernandes de Souza, Taisa Rodrigues Cortes, Rachel Helena Coelho, Sofia Rafaela Maito Velasco, Danielson Jorge Delgado Neves, José Firmino Sousa Filho, Cairo Eduardo Carvalho Barreto, Jório Bezerra Cabral Júnior, Herald Souza dos Reis, Keila Rêgo Mendes, Mayara Christine Correia Lins, Thomás Rocha Ferreira, Mário Henrique Guilherme dos Santos Vanderlei, Marcelo Felix Alonso, Glauber Lopes Mariano, Heliofábio Barros Gomes and Helber Barros Gomes
Climate 2025, 13(2), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13020023 - 24 Jan 2025
Viewed by 390
Abstract
This study explores the predictability of monthly asthma notifications using models built from different machine learning techniques in Maceió, a municipality with a tropical climate located in the northeast of Brazil. Two sets of predictors were combined and tested, the first containing meteorological [...] Read more.
This study explores the predictability of monthly asthma notifications using models built from different machine learning techniques in Maceió, a municipality with a tropical climate located in the northeast of Brazil. Two sets of predictors were combined and tested, the first containing meteorological variables and pollutants, called exp1, and the second only meteorological variables, called exp2. For both experiments, tests were also carried out incorporating lagged information from the time series of asthma records. The models were trained on 80% of the data and validated on the remaining 20%. Among the five methods evaluated—random forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM), and K-nearest neighbors (KNN)—the RF models showed superior performance, notably those of exp1 when incorporating lagged asthma notifications as an additional predictor. Minimum temperature and sulfur dioxide emerged as key variables, probably due to their associations with respiratory health and pollution levels, emphasizing their role in asthma exacerbation. The autocorrelation of the residuals was assessed due to the inclusion of lagged variables in some experiments. The results highlight the importance of pollutant and meteorological factors in predicting asthma cases, with implications for public health monitoring. Despite the limitations presented and discussed, this study demonstrates that forecast accuracy improves when a wider range of lagged variables are used, and indicates the suitability of RF for health datasets with complex time series. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives in Air Pollution, Climate, and Public Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Scatter plots of observed versus predicted data from MLR (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), RF (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>), XGBoost (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>), KNN (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>), and SVR (<b>i</b>,<b>j</b>) models. Data from exp1 in red and exp2 in blue.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Observed versus predicted time series of MLR (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), RD (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>), XGBoost (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>), KNN (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>), and SVR (<b>i</b>,<b>j</b>) models. Observed data in black, exp1 in red and exp2 in blue.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Observed (black line) versus predicted time series of the random forest models 1 (<b>a</b>) RF1, blue line, 2 (<b>b</b>) RF2, green line, 3 (<b>c</b>) RF3, red line, and 4 (<b>d</b>) RF4, yellow line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Autocorrelation of the residuals from random forest models 1 (RF1—(<b>a</b>)), 2 (RF2—(<b>b</b>)) 3 (RF3—(<b>c</b>)), and 4 (RF4—(<b>d</b>)).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 1296 KiB  
Article
MIESTC: A Multivariable Spatio-Temporal Model for Accurate Short-Term Wind Speed Forecasting
by Shaohan Li, Min Chen, Lu Yi, Qifeng Lu and Hao Yang
Atmosphere 2025, 16(1), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16010067 - 9 Jan 2025
Viewed by 343
Abstract
Wind speed forecasting is an essential part of weather prediction, with significant value in economics, business, and management. Utilizing multiple meteorological variables can improve prediction accuracy, but existing methods face challenges such as mixing and noise due to variable differences, as well as [...] Read more.
Wind speed forecasting is an essential part of weather prediction, with significant value in economics, business, and management. Utilizing multiple meteorological variables can improve prediction accuracy, but existing methods face challenges such as mixing and noise due to variable differences, as well as difficulty in capturing complex spatio-temporal dependencies. To address these issues, this study introduces a novel short-term wind speed forecasting model named as MIESTC. The proposed model employs an independent encoder to extract features from each meteorological variable, mitigating the issues of noise that are caused by variable mixing. Then, a multivariate spatio-temporal correlation module is used to capture the global spatio-temporal dependencies between variables and model their interactions. Experimental results on the ERA5-LAND dataset show that, compared to the ConvLSTM, UNET, and SimVP models, the MIESTC model reduces RMSE by 14.60%, 8.64%, and 10.41%, respectively, for a 1 h prediction duration. For a 6 h prediction duration, the corresponding reductions are 13.91%, 8.20%, and 6.95%, validating its superior performance in short-term wind speed forecasting. Furthermore, an analysis of variable impacts reveals that U10, V10, and T2M play dominant roles in wind speed prediction, while TP exhibits a relatively lower impact, aligning with the results of the correlation analysis. These findings underscore the potential of MIESTC as an effective and reliable tool for short-term wind speed prediction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Atmospheric Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Research area and five research sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Correlation analysis of different factors with wind speed across five locations. A, B, C, D, and E represent the five research locations in the study. The chart shows that the correlation between the wind speed and various factors differs significantly across locations. The factors u10, v10, and t2m exhibit strong correlations with the wind speed at multiple locations, suggesting their importance as primary influencing factors, whereas sp and tp show relatively strong correlations at specific locations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>An overview of the MIESTC model’s architecture. Subfigure (<b>a</b>) illustrates the overall workflow, including the independent encoding of multiple meteorological variables (WS, U10, V10, T2M, TP, SP), spatio-temporal feature extraction through the MSTC module to capture the spatio-temporal relationships between variables, and finally the decoding and prediction using the predictor module. The skip connection aids in preserving features from earlier stages. Subfigures (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) present the detailed structures of the encoder block, MSTC block, and predictor block.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The data distribution of the meteorological variables. These variables clearly exhibit significant differences in their distributions, with distinct scales and semantic units.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Model performance comparison. This figure presents the performances of various models at different prediction time horizons, evaluated with RMSE, PCC, MAE, and SSIM metrics. The results indicate that the MIESTC model consistently surpasses other models across all time steps and evaluation metrics, highlighting its superior effectiveness in short-term wind speed forecasting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Visual representation of wind speed prediction results across different models. The red boxes indicate areas where the prediction deviates significantly from the ground truth, highlighting the deficiencies in different models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Attention weight distribution of wind speed prediction variables. This heatmap illustrates the attention weight distribution of each meteorological variable (U10, V10, T2M, SP, TP, WS) across eight attention heads in the MSTC module. The attention heads (Head 1 to Head 8) represent different perspectives of the model in capturing variable relationships. Darker colors indicate higher attention weights, highlighting the relative importance of each variable for wind speed prediction.</p>
Full article ">
30 pages, 34574 KiB  
Article
A Comprehensive Assessment of PM2.5 and PM10 Pollution in Cusco, Peru: Spatiotemporal Analysis and Development of the First Predictive Model (2017–2020)
by Julio Warthon, Ariatna Zamalloa, Amanda Olarte, Bruce Warthon, Ivan Miranda, Miluska M. Zamalloa-Puma, Venancia Ccollatupa, Julia Ormachea, Yanett Quispe, Victor Jalixto, Doris Cruz, Roxana Salcedo, Julieta Valencia, Mirian Mio-Diaz, Ruben Ingles, Greg Warthon, Roberto Tello, Edwin Uscca, Washington Candia, Raul Chura, Jesus Rubio and Modesta Alvarezadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Sustainability 2025, 17(2), 394; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020394 - 7 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1069
Abstract
This study presents the first comprehensive assessment of air pollution by PM2.5 and PM10 in the city of Cusco, aiming to determine atmospheric pollution levels, characterize air quality, and develop predictive models. The research, conducted during 2017–2020, systematically evaluated particulate matter [...] Read more.
This study presents the first comprehensive assessment of air pollution by PM2.5 and PM10 in the city of Cusco, aiming to determine atmospheric pollution levels, characterize air quality, and develop predictive models. The research, conducted during 2017–2020, systematically evaluated particulate matter (PM) contamination using a high-volume sampler (HiVol ECOTEC 3000) installed at 18 monitoring sites distributed across five urban districts. Multiple linear regression (MLR) models were developed and evaluated, incorporating meteorological, seasonal, and temporal variables under two approaches: direct linear (Model 1) and logarithmic transformation (Model 2). The model evaluation employed R², RMSE, MAE, MAPE, IOA, and CV statistical indicators. The results revealed concentrations significantly exceeding WHO guideline values, with PM2.5 ranging between 41.10 ± 3.2 μg/m3 (2020) and 82.01 ± 5.1 μg/m3 (2018), while PM10 values ranged from 45.07 ± 2.8 μg/m3 (2020) to 72.35 ± 4.3 μg/m3 (2017). A notable reduction was observed during 2020, attributable to COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. The Air Quality Index (AQI) indicated predominantly “Unhealthy” and “Very Unhealthy” levels during 2017–2018, improving to “Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups” in 2020. MLR models achieved maximum efficiency using logarithmic transformation, obtaining R² = 0.98 (p < 0.001) for PM2.5 in the 2020 rainy season and R² = 0.44 (p < 0.001) for PM10 in the 2018 annual model. These findings demonstrate the existence of nonlinear relationships between pollutants and predictor variables in Cusco’s atmospheric basin. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Sustainability and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The distribution map of monitoring sites in the Cusco study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A schematic representation of the methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The Violin–Plox concentration of particulate matter during the study years 2017, 2018, and 2020. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>PM</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>PM</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Heatmap of correlation for each year of study between <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>PM</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> and meteorological parameters. (<b>a</b>) Heatmap for 2017; (<b>b</b>) Heatmap for 2018; (<b>c</b>) Heatmap for 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Monthly variation, throughout the study period, of the concentration of particulate matter and meteorological parameters: (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>PM</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>PM</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Average concentration of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>PM</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>PM</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> for (<b>a</b>) each monitoring site and (<b>b</b>) each district, compared to WHO AQG of 2005 and 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Heatmap of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>PM</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>PM</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>12 (Matara Street) also show alarming levels, wi AQI levels in the different assessment years. The subfigures show: (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>PM</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> AQI levels in 2017, (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>PM</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> AQI levels in 2017, (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>PM</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> AQI levels in 2018, (<b>d</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>PM</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> AQI levels in 2018, (<b>e</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>PM</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> AQI levels in 2020, and (<b>f</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>PM</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> AQI levels in 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>A bar chart of the AQI level for <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>PM</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, in (<b>a</b>) each monitoring site and (<b>b</b>) each district of the city of Cusco.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>A heatmap on the AQI level for each monitoring site belonging to the different districts. (<b>a</b>) Map showing the districts of Cusco city: Cusco, Santiago, San Sebastian, Wanchaq, and San Jeronimo; (<b>b</b>) Detailed view of monitoring sites distribution across the districts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Residue diagnostics (<b>a</b>) Residue diagnostics for the best model built for <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>PM</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>; (<b>b</b>) Residue diagnostics for the best model built for <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>PM</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Observed and predicted values (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>PM</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>PM</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 16143 KiB  
Article
Trends and Spatiotemporal Patterns of the Meteorological Drought in the Ili River Valley from 1961 to 2023: An SPEI-Based Study
by Su Hang, Alim Abbas, Bilal Imin, Nijat Kasim and Zinhar Zunun
Atmosphere 2025, 16(1), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16010043 - 2 Jan 2025
Viewed by 339
Abstract
Drought presents significant challenges in arid regions, influencing local climate and environmental dynamics. While the large-scale climatic phenomena in Xinjiang, northwest China, are well-documented, the finer-scale climatic variability in subregions such as the Ili River Valley (IRV) remains insufficiently studied. This knowledge gap [...] Read more.
Drought presents significant challenges in arid regions, influencing local climate and environmental dynamics. While the large-scale climatic phenomena in Xinjiang, northwest China, are well-documented, the finer-scale climatic variability in subregions such as the Ili River Valley (IRV) remains insufficiently studied. This knowledge gap impedes effective regional planning and environmental management in this ecologically sensitive area. In this study, we analyze the spatiotemporal evolution of drought in the IRV from 1961 to 2023, using data from ten meteorological stations. The SPEI drought index, along with Sen’s trend analysis, the Mann–Kendall test, the cumulative departure method, and wavelet analysis, were employed to assess drought patterns. Results show a significant drying trend in the IRV, starting in 1995, with frequent drought events from 2018 onwards, and no notable transition year observed from wet to dry conditions. The overall drought rate was −0.09 per decade, indicating milder drought severity in the IRV compared to broader Xinjiang. Seasonally, the IRV experiences drier summers and wetter winters compared to regional averages, with negligible changes in autumn and milder drought conditions in spring. Abrupt changes in the drying seasons occurred later in the IRV than in Xinjiang, with delays of 21 years for summer, and over 17 and 35 years for spring and autumn, respectively, indicating a lagged response. Spatially, the western plains are more prone to aridification than the central and eastern mountainous regions. The study also reveals significant differences in drought cycles, which are longer than those in Xinjiang, with distinct wet–dry phases observed across multiple time scales and seasons, emphasizing the complexity of drought variability in the IRV. In conclusion, the valley exhibits unique drought characteristics, including milder intensity, pronounced seasonal variation, spatial heterogeneity, and notable resilience to climate change. These findings underscore the need for region-specific drought management strategies, as broader approaches may not be effective at the subregional scale. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Meteorology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Sketch map of the study area (the black line represents the country border, the green area indicates the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of China, and the red area denotes the Ili River Valley).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Fluctuation diagrams of SPEI-1 (<b>a</b>), SPEI-3 (<b>b</b>), and SPEI-12 (<b>c</b>) for the Ili River Valley region from 1961 to 2023 (The deeper the green, the more humid it is; the deeper the red, the more arid it becomes).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Results of the Mann–Kendall (M-K) mutation test (<b>a</b>) and anomaly analysis (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Temporal variations in SPEI in the Ili River Valley Region from 1961 to 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Changing characteristics of meteorological drought in the Ili River Valley from 1961 to 2023; spring (<b>a</b>), summer (<b>b</b>), autumn (<b>c</b>), and winter (<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Variation trends in seasonal SPEI interannual anomalies and cumulative anomalies in the Ili River Valley from 1961 to 2023; spring (<b>a</b>), summer (<b>b</b>), autumn (<b>c</b>), and winter (<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spatial variation trends in seasonal SPEI in the Ili River Valley from 1961 to 2023; spring (<b>a</b>), summer (<b>b</b>), autumn (<b>c</b>), and winter (<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Real contour map of the annual SPEI wavelet coefficients, (<b>b</b>) wavelet variance of the annual SPEI in the Ili River Valley from 1961 to 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a1</b>–<b>a4</b>) Real contour map of the seasonal SPEI wavelet coefficients, (<b>b1</b>–<b>b4</b>) wavelet variance of the seasonal SPEI in the Ili River Valley from 1961 to 2023; spring (<b>a1</b>,<b>b1</b>), summer (<b>a2</b>,<b>b2</b>), autumn (<b>a3</b>,<b>b3</b>), and winter (<b>a4</b>,<b>b4</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Three-dimensional scatter plot of the time scales and average periods of the SPEI on an annual scale at various stations in the Ili River Valley from 1961 to 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Three-dimensional scatter plot of the time scales and average periods of the SPEI on a seasonal scale at various stations in the Ili River Valley from 1961 to 2023; spring (<b>a</b>), summer (<b>b</b>), autumn (<b>c</b>), and winter (<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 577 KiB  
Article
Correlation of Geographic Variables with the Incidence Rate of Dengue Fever in Mexico: A 38-Year Study
by Porfirio Felipe Hernández Bautista, David Alejandro Cabrera Gaytán, Alfonso Vallejos Parás, Olga María Alejo Martínez, Lumumba Arriaga Nieto, Brenda Leticia Rocha Reyes, Carmen Alicia Ruíz Valdez, Leticia Jaimes Betancourt, Gabriel Valle Alvarado, Yadira Pérez Andrade and Alejandro Moctezuma Paz
Microorganisms 2024, 12(12), 2661; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122661 - 22 Dec 2024
Viewed by 618
Abstract
Background: Dengue is a viral disease transmitted by the mosquitoes Aedes, which is characterized by fever, myalgia and arthralgia. In some cases, it can be fatal. For many years, dengue fever has been endemic to Mexico; however, few studies have investigated the [...] Read more.
Background: Dengue is a viral disease transmitted by the mosquitoes Aedes, which is characterized by fever, myalgia and arthralgia. In some cases, it can be fatal. For many years, dengue fever has been endemic to Mexico; however, few studies have investigated the historical and current extents of dengue fever at the national level or considered the effects of variables such as temperature, precipitation and elevation on its occurrence. Methods: An ecological study was carried out to compare the incidence rates of different types of dengue fever per hundred thousand inhabitants with temperature, precipitation and elevation between 1985 and 2023 in Mexico. The sources of information were the public records of the Ministry of Health and the National Meteorological Service. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed with Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients at an alpha of <0.05. Results: The global linear regression presented an R2 of 0.68 between the mean temperature and the cases of haemorrhagic dengue/severe/with warning signs. The degree of rainfall was not strongly correlated with the incidence rate, except in the eastern part of the country, where average temperature was also strongly correlated with the incidence rate. Nonsevere/classic dengue was most common from 1501 to 2000 m elevation, whereas severe forms of the disease were more prevalent at elevations greater than 2000 m. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Change and Emerging Arboviruses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Dengue incidence rate by type and temperature in Mexico, 1985—2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Haemorrhagic dengue/severe dengue and average temperature in the Eastern Region of Mexico.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 976 KiB  
Article
Forecasting Indoor Air Quality in Mexico City Using Deep Learning Architectures
by Jorge Altamirano-Astorga, J. Octavio Gutierrez-Garcia and Edgar Roman-Rangel
Atmosphere 2024, 15(12), 1529; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121529 - 20 Dec 2024
Viewed by 539
Abstract
Air pollution causes millions of premature deaths per year due to its strong association with several diseases and respiratory afflictions. Consequently, air quality monitoring and forecasting systems have been deployed in large urban areas. However, those systems forecast outdoor air quality while people [...] Read more.
Air pollution causes millions of premature deaths per year due to its strong association with several diseases and respiratory afflictions. Consequently, air quality monitoring and forecasting systems have been deployed in large urban areas. However, those systems forecast outdoor air quality while people living in relatively large cities spend most of their time indoors. Hence, this work proposes an indoor air quality forecasting system, which was trained with data from Mexico City, and that is supported by deep learning architectures. The novelty of our work is that we forecast an indoor air quality index, taking into account seasonal data for multiple horizons in terms of minutes; whereas related work mostly focuses on forecasting concentration levels of pollutants for a single and relatively large forecasting horizon, using data from a short period of time. To find the best forecasting model, we conducted extensive experimentation involving 133 deep learning models. The deep learning architectures explored were multilayer perceptrons, long short-term memory neural networks, 1-dimension convolutional neural networks, and hybrid architectures, from which LSTM rose as the best-performing architecture. The models were trained using (i) outdoor air pollution data, (ii) publicly available weather data, and (iii) data collected from an indoor air quality sensor that was installed in a house located in a central neighborhood of Mexico City for 17 months. Our empirical results show that deep learning models can forecast an indoor air quality index based on outdoor concentration levels of pollutants in conjunction with indoor and outdoor meteorological variables. In addition, our findings show that the proposed method performs with a mean squared error of 0.0179 and a mean absolute error of 0.1038. We also noticed that 5 months of historical data are enough for accurate training of the forecast models, and that shallow models with around 50,000 parameters have enough predicting power for this task. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Air Quality)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Deep learning forecasting methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Time series for the IAQ: One and two weeks provided for showing details and more general behavior, respectively. Sampled every 15 min.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Mean and standard deviation of the time series for the IAQ: Distributions per month, day of the week, and hour.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Auto-correlation and partial auto-correlation plots for the first 120 lags, sampled every 15 min from the time series for the IAQ.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Cross-correlation and lagged cross-correlation between the IAQ target variable and the independent variables up to 120 lags.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Implemented data pipeline for preprocessing the time-series data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Architecture of the top-performing model: LSTM02.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Deep learning models for indoor air quality forecasting: performance vs. size.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 5341 KiB  
Article
Comparing and Optimizing Four Machine Learning Approaches to Radar-Based Quantitative Precipitation Estimation
by Miaomiao Liu, Juncheng Zuo, Jianguo Tan and Dongwei Liu
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4713; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244713 - 17 Dec 2024
Viewed by 602
Abstract
To improve radar-based quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) methods, this study investigated the relationship between radar reflectivity (Z) and hourly rainfall intensity (R) using data from 289 precipitation events in Shanghai between September 2020 and March 2024. Two Z-R relationship models were compared in [...] Read more.
To improve radar-based quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) methods, this study investigated the relationship between radar reflectivity (Z) and hourly rainfall intensity (R) using data from 289 precipitation events in Shanghai between September 2020 and March 2024. Two Z-R relationship models were compared in terms of their fitting performance: Z = 270.81 R1.09 (empirically fitted relationship) and Z = 300 R1.4 (standard relationship). The results show that the Z = 270.81 R1.09 model outperforms the Z = 300 R1.4 model in terms of fitting accuracy. Specifically, the Z = 270.81 R1.09 model more effectively captures the nonlinear relationship between radar reflectivity and rainfall intensity, with a higher degree of agreement between the fitted curve and the observed data points. This model demonstrated superior performance across all 289 precipitation events. This study evaluated the performance of four machine learning approaches while incorporating five meteorological features: specific differential phase shift (KDP), echo-top height (ET), vertical liquid water content (VIL), differential reflectivity (ZDR), and correlation coefficient (CC). Nine QPE models were constructed using these inputs. The key findings are as follows: (1) For models with a single-variable input, the KAN deep learning model outperformed Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Decision Trees, Support Vector Machines, and the traditional Z-R relationship. (2) When six features were used as inputs, the accuracy of the machine learning models improved significantly, with the KAN deep learning model outperforming other machine learning methods. Compared to using only radar reflectivity, the KAN deep learning model reduced the MRE by 20.78%, MAE by 4.07%, and RMSE by 12.74%, while increasing the coefficient of determination (R2) by 18.74%. (3) The integration of multiple meteorological features and machine learning optimization significantly enhanced QPE accuracy, with the KAN deep learning model performing best under varying meteorological conditions. This approach offers a promising method for improving radar-based QPE, particularly considering seasonal, weather system, and precipitation stage differentiation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Distribution of automatic weather stations (blue dots) and the Qingpu radar (red triangle) in Shanghai.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of the 5 × 5 radar range bin data above the automatic weather station.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Workflow diagram for the relationship between the Z and R model, SVM, GBDT, RFR, and the KAN deep learning model for single-variable and multivariable precipitation estimation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Single-variable KAN deep learning neural network architecture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Multivariable KAN deep learning neural network architecture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of the estimation effects of two Z-R relationships.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Scatter density plots of estimated vs. actual precipitation for five single-variable models: (<b>a</b>) Z = 270.81 R<sup>1.09</sup>; (<b>b</b>) SVM; (<b>c</b>) RF; (<b>d</b>) GBDT; and the (<b>e</b>) KAN deep learning method. The black solid line represents the ideal scenario where estimated values are perfectly aligned with observed values (<span class="html-italic">y = x</span>), while the red solid line indicates the actual relationship between estimated and observed values, highlighting the bias between them.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Map of radar reflectivity and spatial distribution of univariate precipitation estimates using five different models at 06:00 UTC on 24 June 2024: (<b>a</b>) radar reflectivity; (<b>b</b>) Z = 270.81 R<sup>1.09</sup>; (<b>c</b>) Support Vector Machine model; (<b>d</b>) Random Forest model; (<b>e</b>) Gradient Boosting Decision Tree model; and (<b>f</b>) KAN deep learning model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Map of radar reflectivity and spatial distribution of univariate precipitation estimates using five different models at 06:00 UTC on 24 June 2024: (<b>a</b>) radar reflectivity; (<b>b</b>) Z = 270.81 R<sup>1.09</sup>; (<b>c</b>) Support Vector Machine model; (<b>d</b>) Random Forest model; (<b>e</b>) Gradient Boosting Decision Tree model; and (<b>f</b>) KAN deep learning model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Scatter density plots of estimated vs. actual precipitation for four multivariable models: (<b>a</b>) SVM (multivariable); (<b>b</b>) GBDT (multivariable); (<b>c</b>) RF (multivariable); and (<b>d</b>) KAN deep learning method (multivariable). The red solid line represents the ideal scenario where estimated values are perfectly aligned with observed values (<span class="html-italic">y = x</span>), while the black solid line indicates the actual relationship between estimated and observed values, highlighting the bias between them.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Map of radar reflectivity and spatial distribution of multivariable precipitation estimates using four different models at 06:00 UTC on June 24, 2024: (<b>a</b>) radar reflectivity map; (<b>b</b>) Support Vector Machine model; (<b>c</b>) Random Forest model; (<b>d</b>) Gradient Boosting Decision Tree model; and (<b>e</b>) KAN deep learning model.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 11114 KiB  
Article
Development of a Diagnostic Algorithm for Detecting Freezing Precipitation from ERA5 Dataset: An Adjustment to the Far East
by Mikhail Pichugin, Irina Gurvich, Anastasiya Baranyuk, Vladimir Kuleshov and Elena Khazanova
Climate 2024, 12(12), 224; https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12120224 - 17 Dec 2024
Viewed by 886
Abstract
Freezing precipitation and the resultant ice glaze can have catastrophic impacts on urban infrastructure, the environment, forests, and various industries, including transportation, energy, and agriculture. In this study, we develop and evaluate regional algorithms for detecting freezing precipitations in the Far East, utilizing [...] Read more.
Freezing precipitation and the resultant ice glaze can have catastrophic impacts on urban infrastructure, the environment, forests, and various industries, including transportation, energy, and agriculture. In this study, we develop and evaluate regional algorithms for detecting freezing precipitations in the Far East, utilizing the ERA5 reanalysis dataset from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, along with standard meteorological observations for 20 cold seasons (September–May) from 2004 to 2024. We propose modified diagnostic algorithms based on vertical atmospheric temperature and humidity profiles, as well as near-surface characteristics. Additionally, we apply a majority voting ensemble (MVE) technique to integrate outputs from multiple algorithms, thereby enhancing classification accuracy. Evaluation of detection skills shows significant improvements over the original method developed at the Finnish Meteorological Institute and the ERA5 precipitation-type product. The MVE-based method demonstrates optimal verification statistics. Furthermore, the modified algorithms validly reproduce the spatially averaged inter-annual variability of freezing precipitation activity in both continental (mean correlation of 0.93) and island (correlation of 0.54) regions. Overall, our findings offer a more effective and valuable tool for operational activities and climatological assessments in the Far East. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Extreme Weather Detection, Attribution and Adaptation Design)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Sensitivity of freezing rain events to time intervals between them: (<b>a</b>) bar plot of the total freezing precipitation amount variability, normalized on the amount at an interval of 3 h (1969 events); (<b>b</b>) the scattering graph of the freezing precipitation events amount at each weather station for the intervals of 6 and 24 h.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spatial distribution and total amount of FZRA events for 20 cold seasons (September–May) from 2004 to 2024 by weather stations observations. Black numbered boxes 1 to 5 define areas with weather stations selected for analysis of freezing precipitation events activity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Box (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and scatter (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) plots of the collocated near-surface temperature (<math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>t</mi> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>) obtained from reanalysis dataset (ERA5) and weather station observations (OBSs) in the coastal zone (distance to the coastline is less than 200 km) and inland. Boxes (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) indicate the interquartile range, with the horizontal line indicating the median value of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>t</mi> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>. Whiskers extend to the 5th and 95th percentiles, with values outside these ranges plotted as black circles. Some statistics are also given on each scatter plot: number of collocated points (<span class="html-italic">N</span>), correlation coefficient (<span class="html-italic">R</span>) and the root mean square error (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>σ</mi> </semantics></math>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Inter-annual variability of FZRA activity over 20 years based on weather station observations (blue) and the algorithm (orange): (<b>a</b>) total FZRA events amount in five areas. (<b>b</b>) Area 1 (China). (<b>c</b>) Area 2 (Korean Peninsula and Ulleungdo Isl.). (<b>d</b>) Area 3 (Primorsky and Khabarovsky regions). (<b>e</b>) Area 4 (Northern Honshu, Hokkaido, and Southern Kuril Isl.). (<b>f</b>) Area 5 (Sakhalin). R—correlation coefficient. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>σ</mi> </semantics></math>—the root mean square error. The y axis is area-averaged mean FZRA amount per station.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Surface analysis map of JMH (Japan Meteorological and Hydrographic Agency) at 00 UTC (<b>a</b>); the cloud system of cyclone on the infrared image (band 4, 10.82 µm) obtained by AVHRR onboard satellite MetOp-B at 01:25 UTC (<b>b</b>) on 8 November 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The temporal variability of meteorological elements (surface air temperature [red lines], relative humidity [blue lines], wind speed and direction [black arrows]) approximately three days before the onset of the FZRA, during precipitation, and approximately two days after its end in Harbin (<b>a</b>) and Khabarovsk (<b>b</b>). The red vertical lines indicate the period of the freezing precipitation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Vertical profiles on skew-T diagram of air temperature (red) and dew point temperature (green) from ERA5 (solid lines) and upper-air sounding (dashed lines) at 00 UTC on 8 November 2021 in Harbin (<b>a</b>); at 23 UTC on 8 November 2021 (<b>b</b>); and at 12 UTC on 9 November 2021 in Khabarovsk (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 620 KiB  
Article
A Higher Charlson Comorbidity Index Is a Risk Factor for Hip Fracture in Older Adults During Low-Temperature Periods: A Cross-Sectional Study
by Ming-Hsiu Chiang, Yi-Jie Kuo, Shu-Wei Huang, Duy Nguyen Anh Tran, Tai-Yuan Chuang, Yu-Pin Chen and Chung-Ying Lin
Medicina 2024, 60(12), 1962; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60121962 - 28 Nov 2024
Viewed by 675
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The incidence of hip fractures is increasing, and there have been reports linking cold weather to a higher risk of fractures. This study aimed to evaluate clinical variables in hip fracture patients who may predispose them to such fractures [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The incidence of hip fractures is increasing, and there have been reports linking cold weather to a higher risk of fractures. This study aimed to evaluate clinical variables in hip fracture patients who may predispose them to such fractures under different temperatures. Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted at a single medical center, enrolling older adults (≥60 years) who had experienced a hip fracture. Comprehensive clinical histories and detailed information regarding each patient’s hip fracture were obtained. All meteorological data were extracted from the Taiwan Central Weather Bureau database. Multiple clinical parameters that may have a close connection with the temperature at which the hip fracture occurred were screened. Statistical analysis involved using the Pearson correlation test or the independent Student’s t test, followed by generalized estimating equation analysis. Results: The cohort comprised 506 older adults with hip fractures. Initial univariate analysis revealed that a history of past cerebrovascular diseases, Charlson Comorbidity Index, patient age, and preinjury Barthel Index were significantly related to the temperature at which the hip fractures occurred. The generalized estimating equation analysis indicated that only the Charlson Comorbidity Index had a considerably inverse association with temperature. This finding suggests that for older adults with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, hip fractures tend to occur at lower temperatures and vice versa. Conclusions: Comorbidities are the only clinical concern that predisposes older adults to hip fractures under colder temperatures. This epidemiological finding could guide future patient education and hip fracture prevention programs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The distribution of hip fracture patients (depicted in blue) and the number of daily average temperatures (depicted in black) are shown in five different temperature intervals during the study period.</p>
Full article ">
30 pages, 6762 KiB  
Article
Linking Meteorological Variables and Particulate Matter PM2.5 in the Aburrá Valley, Colombia
by Juan C. Parra, Miriam Gómez, Hernán D. Salas, Blanca A. Botero, Juan G. Piñeros, Jaime Tavera and María P. Velásquez
Sustainability 2024, 16(23), 10250; https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310250 - 23 Nov 2024
Viewed by 756
Abstract
Environmental pollution indicated by the presence of PM2.5 particulate matter varies based on prevailing atmospheric conditions described by certain meteorological variables. Consequently, it is important to understand atmospheric behavior in areas such as the Aburrá Valley, which experiences recurrent pollution events [...] Read more.
Environmental pollution indicated by the presence of PM2.5 particulate matter varies based on prevailing atmospheric conditions described by certain meteorological variables. Consequently, it is important to understand atmospheric behavior in areas such as the Aburrá Valley, which experiences recurrent pollution events twice a year. This study examines the behavior of specific meteorological variables and PM2.5 particulate matter in the Aburrá Valley. By using statistical analysis tools such as correlation coefficients, principal component analysis (PCA), and multiple linear regression models, the research identifies relationships between PM2.5 and daily cycles of temperature, rainfall, radiation, and wind speed and direction. Datasets were analyzed considering periods before and after the COVID-19 lockdown (pre-pandemic and pandemic, respectively), and specific pollution events were also analyzed. Furthermore, this work considers the relationships between PM2.5 and meteorological variables, contrasting the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. This study characterizes diurnal cycles of meteorological variables and their relationship with PM2.5. There are consistent patterns among temperature, atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) height, and solar radiation, whereas precipitation and relative humidity show the opposite behavior. PM2.5 exhibits similar relative frequency functions during both daytime and nighttime, regardless of rainfall. An inverse relationship is noted between PM2.5 levels and ABL height at different times of the day. Moreover, the PCA results show that the first principal component explains around 60% of the total variance in the hydrometeorological data. The second PC explains 10%, and the rest of the variance is distributed among the other three to eight PCs. In this sense, there is no significant difference between the two PCAs with hydrometeorological data from a pre-pandemic period and a COVID-19 pandemic period. Multiple regression analysis indicates a significant and consistent dependence of PM2.5 on temperature and solar radiation across both analyzed periods. The application of Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) to our dataset yielded promising results, reflecting the complex relationship between meteorological variables and PM2.5 concentrations. The metrics obtained from the GAM were as follows: Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 98.04, Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 9.90, R-squared (R2) of 0.24, Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) of 110,051.34, and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) of 110,140.63. In comparison, the linear regression model exhibited slightly higher MSE (100.49), RMSE (10.02), and lower R-squared (0.22), with AIC and BIC values of 110,407.45 and 110,460.67, respectively. Although the improvement in performance metrics from GAM over the linear model is not conclusive, they indicate a better fit for the complexity of atmospheric dynamics influencing PM2.5 levels. These findings underscore the intricate interplay of meteorological factors and particulate matter concentration, reinforcing the necessity for advanced modeling techniques in environmental studies. This work presents new insights that enhance the diagnosis, understanding, and modeling of environmental pollution, thereby supporting informed decision-making and strengthening management efforts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Air Pollution Management and Environment Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the MED-BEME gauge station at Pedro Justo Berrío School (Aburrá Valley, Colombia).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Measurement equiments. MED-BEME Station.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Diurnal cycles of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, solar radiation, temperature, humidity, and atmospheric boundary layer height. April 2019 to August 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Relative frequency functions of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> for (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) dry annual conditions, and (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) humid annual conditions. Diurnal hours (left) and nightly hours (right). April 2019 to August 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Average april 2019 to September 2022 wind rose for the Aburrá Valley. Daytime (<b>a</b>) conditions and nighttime (<b>b</b>) conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Average boundary layer height for PGE and non-PGE periods in contrast with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> values for the same periods (November 2019 to October 2020). Data were obtained from the Aburrá Valley Metropolitan Area (AMVA) and SIATA project. In the Aburrá Valley, there is a typical annual behavior of air pollution levels that is determined by meteorology. The transition between the dry season and the first rainy season occurs in March and is characterized by the presence of low cloud layers that cause the accumulation of pollutants in the atmosphere. During this phenomenon, the highest concentrations of particulate matter of the year are recorded. Likewise, the second transition from rainy season to dry season occurs in November, when particulate matter concentrations increase again. These facts characterize the pollution episode management periods (PGE and non-PGE periods).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Principal component analysis of hydrometeorological variables.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Scatter diagrams and tendency ellipses for scores between couples of PCs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Correlation matrix for climatological variables and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> in the pre-pandemic (panel (<b>a</b>)) and pandemic periods (panel (<b>b</b>)). Values in white have a significance level greater than 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Isolated relationship for MLR between <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> temperature and solar radiation, keeping all other variables constant for both periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>GAM smooth functions for predictors of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) Predicted <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> vs. observed <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>b</b>) Wind speed vs. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>c</b>) Wind direction vs. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>d</b>) Rain vs. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>e</b>) Temperature vs. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>f</b>) Solar radiation vs. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mrow> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 24009 KiB  
Article
Variations over 20 Years in Vegetation Dynamics and Its Coupled Responses to Individual and Compound Meteorological Drivers in Sichuan Province, China
by Qian Deng, Chenfeng Zhang, Jiong Dong, Yanchun Li, Yunyun Li, Yi Huang, Hongxue Zhang and Jingjing Fan
Atmosphere 2024, 15(11), 1384; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15111384 - 17 Nov 2024
Viewed by 870
Abstract
This study presents an innovative investigation into the spatiotemporal dynamics of vegetation growth and its response to both individual and composite climatic factors. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), derived from SPOT satellite remote sensing data, was employed as a proxy for vegetation [...] Read more.
This study presents an innovative investigation into the spatiotemporal dynamics of vegetation growth and its response to both individual and composite climatic factors. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), derived from SPOT satellite remote sensing data, was employed as a proxy for vegetation growth. Multiple analytical methods, including the coefficient of variation, Mann–Kendall trend analysis, and Hurst index, were applied to characterize the spatiotemporal patterns of the NDVI in Sichuan Province from 2000 to 2020. The Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) was calculated using monthly precipitation and temperature data from 45 meteorological stations to examine the influence of composite climatic factors on vegetation growth, while the time lag effects between the NDVI and various climatic variables were also explored. Our findings unveil three key insights: (1) Vegetation coverage in Sichuan Province exhibited an overall increasing trend, with the highest NDVI values in summer and the lowest in winter. Significant NDVI fluctuations were observed in spring in the western Sichuan plateau and in winter in northern, eastern, and southern Sichuan. (2) A significant upward trend in the NDVI was detected across Sichuan Province, except for Chengdu Plain, where a downward trend prevailed outside the summer season. (3) On shorter time scales, the NDVI was positively correlated with precipitation, temperature, and the SPEI, with a one-month lag. The response of the NDVI to sunlight duration showed a two-month lag, with the weakest correlation and a five-month lag in western Sichuan. This research advances our understanding of the complex interactions between vegetation dynamics and climatic factors in Sichuan Province and provides valuable insights for predicting future vegetation growth trends. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of Sichuan Province and its sub-regions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Temporal changes in precipitation of Sichuan Province during 2000–2020. (West Sichuan (WS); North Sichuan (NS); East Sichuan (ES); Central Sichuan (CS); South Sichuan (SS); Total: Sichuan).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Temporal changes in temperature of Sichuan Province during 2000–2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Temporal changes in sunshine duration of Sichuan Province during 2000–2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Temporal changes in SPEI of Sichuan Province during 2000–2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial variations in SPEI in Sichuan Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Temporal variations in NDVI in Sichuan Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Mean spatial distribution of NDVI in Sichuan Province. (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) indicate the average NDVI distribution in Sichuan Province from 2000 to 2020 for spring, summer, autumn, winter, the growing season, and yearly periods, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Spatial fluctuations of NDVI in Sichuan Province. (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) represent the stability of vegetation cover in Sichuan Province from 2000 to 2020 for spring, summer, autumn, winter, the growing season, and yearly periods, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Spatial analysis of vegetation change trends across Sichuan Province. (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) represent the vegetation cover change trends in Sichuan Province from 2000 to 2020 for spring, summer, autumn, winter, the growing season, and annual periods, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Significance analysis of vegetation growth trends in Sichuan Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Spatial distribution of future change trends in vegetation growth of Sichuan Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Spatial distribution of partial correlation between NDVI and single climatic factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Time lag effect of NDVI on precipitation. (● Indicates the maximum value).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Time lag effect of NDVI on temperature. (● Indicates the maximum value).</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Time lag effect of NDVI on sunshine duration. (● Indicates the maximum value).</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Spatial distribution of correlation between NDVI and SPEI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Time lag effect of NDVI on SPEI. (● indicates the lag time).</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 8159 KiB  
Article
An Innovative TOPSIS–Mahalanobis Distance Approach to Comprehensive Spatial Prioritization Based on Multi-Dimensional Drought Indicators
by Antao Wang, Linan Sun and Jinping Liu
Atmosphere 2024, 15(11), 1347; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15111347 - 9 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1019
Abstract
This research explores a new methodological framework that blends the TOPSIS (technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution) and Mahalanobis Distance methods, allowing for the prioritization of nine major watersheds in China based on the integration of multi-dimensional drought indicators. [...] Read more.
This research explores a new methodological framework that blends the TOPSIS (technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution) and Mahalanobis Distance methods, allowing for the prioritization of nine major watersheds in China based on the integration of multi-dimensional drought indicators. This integrated approach offers a robust prioritization model by accounting for spatial dependencies between indices, a feature not commonly addressed in traditional multi-criteria decision-making applications in drought studies. This study utilized three drought indices—the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI), Vegetation Health Index (VHI), and Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI). Over years of significant drought prevalence, three types of droughts occurred simultaneously across various watersheds in multiple years, particularly in 2001, 2002, 2006, and 2009, with respective counts of 16, 17, 19, and 18 concurrent episodes. The weights derived from Shannon’s entropy emphasize the importance of the Potential Drought Severity Index (PDSI) in evaluating drought conditions, with PDSI-D (drought duration) assigned the highest weight of 0.267, closely followed by VHI-D (Vegetation Health Index under drought conditions) at 0.232 and SPEI-F (drought frequency) at 0.183. The results demonstrated considerable spatial variability in drought conditions across the watersheds, with Watersheds 1 and 4 exhibiting the highest drought vulnerability in terms of meteorological and agricultural droughts, while Watersheds 6 and 3 showed significant resilience to hydrological drought after 2012. In particular, the severe meteorological drought conditions at Watershed 1 highlight the urgent need for rainwater harvesting and strict water use policies, and in contrast, the conditions at Watershed 4 show the need for the modernization of irrigation to mitigate agricultural drought impacts. This integrated framework allows for targeted drought management solutions that directly relate to the specific contexts of the watersheds, while being more conducive to planning and prioritizing resource allocations for regions facing the highest drought vulnerability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location map of the study area and the nine major watersheds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Methodological flowchart adopted in this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Temporal variability in drought indicators across major watersheds of China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The total number of meteorological, agricultural, and hydrological drought events experienced across China over the years.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial patterns of the SPEI, VHI, and PDSI indices, representing meteorological, agricultural, and hydrological droughts, respectively, across China during two notably severe years: 2001 and 2006.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop