[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (2,580)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = benchmark functions

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 5855 KiB  
Article
A Novel AVR System Utilizing Fuzzy PIDF Enriched by FOPD Controller Optimized via PSO and Sand Cat Swarm Optimization Algorithms
by Mokhtar Shouran, Mohammed Alenezi, Mohamed Naji Muftah, Abdalmajid Almarimi, Abdalghani Abdallah and Jabir Massoud
Energies 2025, 18(6), 1337; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18061337 (registering DOI) - 8 Mar 2025
Abstract
Power system stability is managed through various control loops, including the Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR), which regulates the terminal voltage of synchronous generators. This study integrated Fuzzy Logic Control (FLC) and a Proportional–Integral–Derivative controller with Filtered derivative action (PIDF) to propose a hybrid [...] Read more.
Power system stability is managed through various control loops, including the Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR), which regulates the terminal voltage of synchronous generators. This study integrated Fuzzy Logic Control (FLC) and a Proportional–Integral–Derivative controller with Filtered derivative action (PIDF) to propose a hybrid Fuzzy PIDF controller enhanced by Fractional-Order Proportional-Derivative (FOPD) for AVR applications. For the first time, the newly introduced Sand Cat Swarm Optimization (SCSO) algorithm was applied to the AVR system to tune the parameters of the proposed fuzzy controller. The SCSO algorithm has been recognized as a powerful optimization tool and has demonstrated success across various engineering applications. The well-known Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm was also utilized in this study to optimize the gains of the proposed controller. The Fuzzy PIDF plus FOPD is a novel configuration that is designed to be a robust control technique for AVR to achieve an excellent performance. In this research, the Fuzzy PIDF + FOPD controller was optimized using the PSO and SCSO algorithms by minimizing the Integral Time Absolute Error (ITAE) objective function to enhance the overall performance of AVR systems. A comparative analysis was conducted to evaluate the superiority of the proposed approach by benchmarking the results against those of other controllers reported in the literature. Furthermore, the robustness of the controller was assessed under parametric uncertainties and varying load disturbances. Also, its robustness was examined against disturbances in the control signal. The results demonstrate that the proposed Fuzzy PIDF + FOPD controller tuned by the PSO and SCSO algorithms delivers exceptional performance as an AVR controller, outperforming other controllers. Additionally, the findings confirm the robustness of the Fuzzy PIDF + FOPD controller against parametric uncertainties, establishing its potential for a successful implementation in real-time applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section F: Electrical Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>AVR system structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>AVR system’s block diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Step response of the AVR system without a controller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Root locus diagram of the AVR system without a controller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The structure of the proposed AVR system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The membership functions of the fuzzy controller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Flowchart for the SCSO algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The SCSO algorithm tunes the suggested Fuzzy PIDF plus FOPD structure for the AVR system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The convergence curves of the SCSO and PSO algorithms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The dynamic response of the AVR model based on different control techniques.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Settling and rise times of different techniques.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>ITAE of different techniques.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Peak overshoot and undershoot of different techniques.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Step responses of AVR systems without a controller under different parametric uncertainty conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14 Cont.
<p>Step responses of AVR systems without a controller under different parametric uncertainty conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Step responses of AVR system in nominal conditions and under parametric uncertainties.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>The AVR system under control signal and load disturbances.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Step responses of the AVR system in nominal conditions and under parametric uncertainties in addition to load and control signal disturbances.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 2585 KiB  
Article
“Optimizing the Optimization”: A Hybrid Evolutionary-Based AI Scheme for Optimal Performance
by Agathoklis A. Krimpenis and Loukas Athanasakos
Computers 2025, 14(3), 97; https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14030097 (registering DOI) - 8 Mar 2025
Viewed by 9
Abstract
Optimization algorithms for solving technological and scientific problems often face long convergence times and high computational costs due to numerous input/output parameters and complex calculations. This study focuses on proposing a method for minimizing response times for such algorithms across various scientific fields, [...] Read more.
Optimization algorithms for solving technological and scientific problems often face long convergence times and high computational costs due to numerous input/output parameters and complex calculations. This study focuses on proposing a method for minimizing response times for such algorithms across various scientific fields, including the design and manufacturing of high-performance, high-quality components. It introduces an innovative mixed-scheme optimization algorithm aimed at effective optimization with minimal objective function evaluations. Indicative key optimization algorithms—namely, the Genetic Algorithm, Firefly Algorithm, Harmony Search Algorithm, and Black Hole Algorithm—were analyzed as paradigms to standardize parameters for integration into the mixed scheme. The proposed scheme designates one algorithm as a “leader” to initiate optimization, guiding others in iterative evaluations and enforcing intermediate solution exchanges. This collaborative process seeks to achieve optimal solutions at reduced convergence costs. This mixed scheme was tested on challenging benchmark functions, demonstrating convergence speeds that were at least three times faster than the best-performing standalone algorithms while maintaining solution quality. These results highlight its potential as an efficient optimization approach for computationally intensive problems, regardless of the included algorithms and their standalone performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue AI in Its Ecosystem)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview flow chart of the hybrid algorithmic scheme.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Pseudocode sequence of the hybrid scheme leader.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Representation of the results for the Sphere concerning 2D (<b>upper left</b>), 3D (<b>upper right</b>) and accuracy (<b>bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Representation of the results for the Schwefel concerning 2D (<b>upper left</b>), 3D (<b>upper right</b>) and accuracy (<b>bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Representation of the results for the Alpine N.2 concerning 2D (<b>upper left</b>), 3D (<b>upper right</b>) and accuracy (<b>bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Representation of the results regarding the performance of the Hybrid scheme for Sphere (<b>left</b>), Schwefel (<b>right</b>), and Alpine N.2 (<b>center</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Performance graph for solution accuracy of the hybrid scheme. Lower is better.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 797 KiB  
Article
Enhanced Local Search for Bee Colony Optimization in Economic Dispatch with Smooth Cost Functions
by Apinan Aurasopon, Chiraphon Takeang and Wanchai Khamsen
Processes 2025, 13(3), 787; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13030787 (registering DOI) - 8 Mar 2025
Viewed by 16
Abstract
This study introduces an Enhanced Local Search (ELS) technique integrated into the Bee Colony Optimization (BCO) algorithm to address the Economic Dispatch (ED) problem characterized by a continuous cost function. This paper combines Lambda Iteration and Golden Section Search with Bee Colony Optimization [...] Read more.
This study introduces an Enhanced Local Search (ELS) technique integrated into the Bee Colony Optimization (BCO) algorithm to address the Economic Dispatch (ED) problem characterized by a continuous cost function. This paper combines Lambda Iteration and Golden Section Search with Bee Colony Optimization (BCO) into a more efficient method called Enhanced Local Search for Bee Colony Optimization (ELS-BCO). The proposed methodology seeks to enhance search efficiency and solution quality. One of the main challenges with standard BCO is random initialization, which can lead to slow convergence. The ELS-BCO algorithm overcomes this issue by using Lambda Iteration for better initial estimation and Golden Section Search to refine the movement direction of the bees. These enhancements significantly improve the algorithm’s capacity to identify optimal solutions. The performance of ELS-BCO was evaluated on two benchmark systems with three and six power generators, and the results were compared with those of the original BCO, LI-BCO, GS-BCO, and traditional optimization methods such as Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Hybrid PSO, Lambda Iteration with Simulated Annealing, the Sine Cosine Algorithm, Mountaineering Team-Based Optimization, and Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization. The results demonstrate that ELS-BCO achieves faster convergence and higher-quality solutions than these existing methods. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Advanced Digital and Other Processes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of the proposed ELS-BCO method for solving the ED problem.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Convergence curve of the three-unit system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Convergence curve of the six-unit system.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 459 KiB  
Article
Behavioral Dynamics Analysis in Language Education: Generative State Transitions and Attention Mechanisms
by Qi Zhang, Yiming Qian, Shumiao Gao, Yufei Liu, Xinyu Shen and Qing Jiang
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(3), 326; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030326 - 6 Mar 2025
Viewed by 147
Abstract
This study proposes a novel approach for analyzing learning behaviors in Chinese language education by integrating generative attention mechanisms and generative state transition equations. This method dynamically adjusts attention weights and models real-time changes in students’ emotional and behavioral states, addressing key limitations [...] Read more.
This study proposes a novel approach for analyzing learning behaviors in Chinese language education by integrating generative attention mechanisms and generative state transition equations. This method dynamically adjusts attention weights and models real-time changes in students’ emotional and behavioral states, addressing key limitations of existing approaches. A central innovation is the introduction of a generative loss function, which jointly optimizes sentiment prediction and behavior analysis, enhancing the adaptability of the model to diverse learning scenarios. This study is based on empirical experiments involving student behavior tracking, sentiment analysis, and personalized learning path modeling. Experimental results demonstrate this method’s effectiveness, achieving an accuracy of 90.6%, recall of 88.4%, precision of 89.3%, and F1-score of 88.8% in behavioral prediction tasks. Furthermore, this approach attains a learning satisfaction score of 89.2 with a 94.3% positive feedback rate, significantly outperforming benchmark models such as BERT, GPT-3, and T5. These findings validate the practical applicability and robustness of the proposed method, offering a structured framework for personalized teaching optimization and dynamic behavior modeling in Chinese language education. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cognition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of the proposed method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Generative attention mechanism.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Generative state transition equation.</p>
Full article ">
34 pages, 4757 KiB  
Article
Electrical Storm Optimization (ESO) Algorithm: Theoretical Foundations, Analysis, and Application to Engineering Problems
by Manuel Soto Calvo and Han Soo Lee
Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr. 2025, 7(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/make7010024 - 6 Mar 2025
Viewed by 371
Abstract
The electrical storm optimization (ESO) algorithm, inspired by the dynamic nature of electrical storms, is a novel population-based metaheuristic that employs three dynamically adjusted parameters: field resistance, field intensity, and field conductivity. Field resistance assesses the spread of solutions within the search space, [...] Read more.
The electrical storm optimization (ESO) algorithm, inspired by the dynamic nature of electrical storms, is a novel population-based metaheuristic that employs three dynamically adjusted parameters: field resistance, field intensity, and field conductivity. Field resistance assesses the spread of solutions within the search space, reflecting strategy diversity. The field intensity balances the exploration of new territories and the exploitation of promising areas. The field conductivity adjusts the adaptability of the search process, enhancing the algorithm’s ability to escape local optima and converge on global solutions. These adjustments enable the ESO to adapt in real-time to various optimization scenarios, steering the search toward potential optima. ESO’s performance was rigorously tested against 60 benchmark problems from the IEEE CEC SOBC 2022 suite and 20 well-known metaheuristics. The results demonstrate the superior performance of ESOs, particularly in tasks requiring a nuanced balance between exploration and exploitation. Its efficacy is further validated through successful applications in four engineering domains, highlighting its precision, stability, flexibility, and efficiency. Additionally, the algorithm’s computational costs were evaluated in terms of the number of function evaluations and computational overhead, reinforcing its status as a standout choice in the metaheuristic field. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of the electrical storm optimization (ESO) algorithm illustrating the initialization of agents, the iterative adjustments of environmental parameters, and the continuous selection and refinement of solutions toward identifying the optimum.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Conceptual behavior of field intensity curves under different scenarios, showing the dynamic modulation of the transition between the exploration and exploitation stages.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Convergence curves of the algorithms for unimodal problems. The ESO (red line) shows consistent convergence and MFO (pink line) shows the highest performance variability.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Convergence curves of the algorithms for multimodal problems. The ESO (red line) shows consistent convergence, whereas the MFO (pink line) and PSO (orange line) show greater performance variability.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Normalized behavior of field resistance, field conductivity, field intensity, storm power, and progression toward the global best solution over 1000 iterations for benchmark functions F6, F20, F24, F33, F46, and F50.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Statistical results for the three groups of functions. The critical difference diagrams (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>) illustrate the relative rankings of the algorithms, highlighting the groups of algorithms that are not significantly different from each other. The heatmaps (<b>A1</b>–<b>D1</b>) show that the Bayesian probability of one algorithm outperforms the other.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Statistical results for the three groups of functions. The critical difference diagrams (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>) illustrate the relative rankings of the algorithms, highlighting the groups of algorithms that are not significantly different from each other. The heatmaps (<b>A1</b>–<b>D1</b>) show that the Bayesian probability of one algorithm outperforms the other.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 27384 KiB  
Article
Adaptive Non-Stationary Fuzzy Time Series Forecasting with Bayesian Networks
by Bo Wang and Xiaodong Liu
Sensors 2025, 25(5), 1628; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25051628 - 6 Mar 2025
Viewed by 125
Abstract
Despite its interpretability and excellence in time series forecasting, the fuzzy time series forecasting model (FTSFM) faces significant challenges when handling non-stationary time series. This paper proposes a novel hybrid non-stationary FTSFM that integrates time-variant FTSFM, Bayesian network (BN), and non-stationary fuzzy sets. [...] Read more.
Despite its interpretability and excellence in time series forecasting, the fuzzy time series forecasting model (FTSFM) faces significant challenges when handling non-stationary time series. This paper proposes a novel hybrid non-stationary FTSFM that integrates time-variant FTSFM, Bayesian network (BN), and non-stationary fuzzy sets. We first apply first-order differencing to extract the fluctuation information of the time series while reducing non-stationarity. A novel time-variant FTSFM updating method is proposed to effectively merge historical knowledge with new observations, enhancing model stability while maintaining sensitivity to time series changes. The updating of fuzzy sets is achieved by incorporating non-stationary fuzzy sets and prediction residuals. Based on updated fuzzy sets, the system reconstructs fuzzy logical relationship groups by combining historical and new data. This approach implements dynamic quantitative modeling of fuzzy relationships between historical and predicted moments, integrating valuable historical temporal fuzzy patterns with emerging temporal fuzzy characteristics. This paper further develops an adaptive BN structure learning method with an adaptive scoring function to update temporal dependence relationships between any two moments while building upon existing dependence relationships. Experimental results indicate that the proposed model significantly outperforms benchmark algorithms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Intelligent Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The flow chart of the proposed model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Original and first-order differenced time series for seventeen datasets. The top panel depicts the original time series data. The lower panel shows the first-order differenced time series.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Error scatter plot produced by the proposed model for (<b>a</b>) BTC–USD time series, (<b>b</b>) Dow Jones time series, (<b>c</b>) ETH–USD time series, (<b>d</b>) EUR–GBP time series, (<b>e</b>) EUR–USD time series, (<b>f</b>) GBP–USD time series, (<b>g</b>) NASDAQ time series, (<b>h</b>) SP500<sub>a</sub> time series, (<b>i</b>) TAIEX time series.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Error distribution histogram produced by the proposed model for (<b>a</b>) BTC–USD time series, (<b>b</b>) Dow Jones time series, (<b>c</b>) ETH–USD time series, (<b>d</b>) EUR–GBP time series, (<b>e</b>) EUR–USD time series, (<b>f</b>) GBP–USD time series, (<b>g</b>) NASDAQ time series, (<b>h</b>) SP500<sub>a</sub> time series, (<b>i</b>) TAIEX time series.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Prediction intervals yielded by the proposed model and IE-BN-PWFTS for (<b>a</b>) TAIEX time series and (<b>b</b>) EUR–USD time series.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Error scatter plot produced by the proposed model for (<b>a</b>) Sunspot time series, (<b>b</b>) MG time series, (<b>c</b>) SP500<sub>b</sub> time series, (<b>d</b>) Radio time series, (<b>e</b>) Lake time series, (<b>f</b>) CO<sub>2</sub> time series, (<b>g</b>) Milk time series, (<b>h</b>) DJ time series.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Error distribution histogram produced by the proposed model for (<b>a</b>) Sunspot time series, (<b>b</b>) MG time series, (<b>c</b>) SP500<sub>b</sub> time series, (<b>d</b>) Radio time series, (<b>e</b>) Lake time series, (<b>f</b>) CO<sub>2</sub> time series, (<b>g</b>) Milk time series, (<b>h</b>) DJ time series.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 3748 KiB  
Article
A Comparative Study of Energy Management Strategies for Battery-Ultracapacitor Electric Vehicles Based on Different Deep Reinforcement Learning Methods
by Wenna Xu, Hao Huang, Chun Wang, Shuai Xia and Xinmei Gao
Energies 2025, 18(5), 1280; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18051280 - 5 Mar 2025
Viewed by 212
Abstract
An efficient energy management strategy (EMS) is crucial for the energy-saving and emission-reduction effects of electric vehicles. Research on deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-driven energy management systems (EMSs) has made significant strides in the global automotive industry. However, most scholars study only the impact [...] Read more.
An efficient energy management strategy (EMS) is crucial for the energy-saving and emission-reduction effects of electric vehicles. Research on deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-driven energy management systems (EMSs) has made significant strides in the global automotive industry. However, most scholars study only the impact of a single DRL algorithm on EMS performance, ignoring the potential improvement in optimization objectives that different DRL algorithms can offer under the same benchmark. This paper focuses on the control strategy of hybrid energy storage systems (HESSs) comprising lithium-ion batteries and ultracapacitors. Firstly, an equivalent model of the HESS is established based on dynamic experiments. Secondly, a regulated decision-making framework is constructed by uniformly setting the action space, state space, reward function, and hyperparameters of the agent for different DRL algorithms. To compare the control performances of the HESS under various EMSs, the regulation properties are analyzed with the standard driving cycle condition. Finally, the simulation results indicate that the EMS powered by a deep Q network (DQN) markedly diminishes the detrimental impact of peak current on the battery. Furthermore, the EMS based on a deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) reduces energy loss by 28.3%, and the economic efficiency of the EMS based on dynamic programming (DP) is improved to 0.7%. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section E: Electric Vehicles)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The topology of HESS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The model based on an equivalent circuit: (<b>a</b>) Battery. (<b>b</b>) Ultracapacitor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The results of HPPC and UDDS experiments: (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Battery. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Ultracapacitor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The results of precision validation: (<b>a</b>) Battery. (<b>b</b>) Ultracapacitor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The structure of reinforcement learning.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>DQN-based EMS optimization control framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>DDPG-based EMS optimization control framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Driving cycle of UDDS. (<b>a</b>) The velocity of UDDS (<b>b</b>) The required power of UDDS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The comparison results of battery and ultracapacitor under different EMSs: (<b>a</b>) battery <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>bat</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>b</b>) ultracapacitor <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>SOC</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>uc</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>c</b>) battery current; (<b>d</b>) ultracapacitor current; (<b>e</b>) battery power; and (<b>f</b>) ultracapacitor power.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of energy loss in DRL-EMSs.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 2560 KiB  
Article
A Multi-Objective Sensor Placement Method Considering Modal Identification Uncertainty and Damage Detection Sensitivity
by Xue-Yang Pei, Yuan Hou, Hai-Bin Huang and Jun-Xing Zheng
Buildings 2025, 15(5), 821; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15050821 - 5 Mar 2025
Viewed by 88
Abstract
Structural Health Monitoring relies on accurate modal identification and effective damage detection to assess structural performance and safety. However, traditional sensor placement methods struggle to balance modal identification uncertainty, which arises from limited sensor coverage and measurement noise and damage detection sensitivity, which [...] Read more.
Structural Health Monitoring relies on accurate modal identification and effective damage detection to assess structural performance and safety. However, traditional sensor placement methods struggle to balance modal identification uncertainty, which arises from limited sensor coverage and measurement noise and damage detection sensitivity, which requires sensors to be optimally positioned to capture structural stiffness variations. To address this challenge, this study proposes a multi-objective sensor placement optimization method based on the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm. The method introduces two key objective functions: minimizing modal identification uncertainty by leveraging Bayesian modal identification theory and information entropy and maximizing damage detection sensitivity by incorporating an entropy-based measure to quantify the uncertainty in stiffness variation estimation. By formulating the problem as Pareto-based multi-objective optimization, the method efficiently explores a trade-off between the two competing objectives and provides a diverse set of optimal sensor placement solutions. The proposed approach is validated through numerical experiments on a simply supported beam and a benchmark bridge structure, demonstrating that different optimization objectives lead to distinct sensor placement patterns. The results show that solutions prioritizing modal identification distribute sensors across the structure to improve global response estimation, while solutions favoring damage detection concentrate sensors in critical areas to enhance sensitivity. The proposed method significantly improves sensor placement strategies by offering a systematic and flexible framework for SHM applications, enabling engineers to tailor monitoring strategies based on specific structural assessment needs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Numbering of candidate sensor locations on a simply supported beam.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Pareto front based on bi-objective function.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Sensor placement corresponding to different pareto fronts: (<b>a</b>) Case A; (<b>b</b>) Case B; (<b>c</b>) Case C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Pareto front sensor placement for single-objective function preference: (<b>a</b>) Objective 1; (<b>b</b>) Objective 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The bridge benchmark structure: (<b>a</b>) physical model diagram; (<b>b</b>) numbering of candidate measurement points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Pareto front based on bi-objective function.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Sensor placement corresponding to different pareto fronts: (<b>a</b>) Case A; (<b>b</b>) Case B; (<b>c</b>) Case C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Pareto front sensor placement for single-objective function preference: (<b>a</b>) Objective 1; (<b>b</b>) Objective 2.</p>
Full article ">
38 pages, 5655 KiB  
Article
Advanced Deep Learning Models for Improved IoT Network Monitoring Using Hybrid Optimization and MCDM Techniques
by Mays Qasim Jebur Al-Zaidawi and Mesut Çevik
Symmetry 2025, 17(3), 388; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17030388 - 4 Mar 2025
Viewed by 212
Abstract
This study addresses the challenge of optimizing deep learning models for IoT network monitoring, focusing on achieving a symmetrical balance between scalability and computational efficiency, which is essential for real-time anomaly detection in dynamic networks. We propose two novel hybrid optimization methods—Hybrid Grey [...] Read more.
This study addresses the challenge of optimizing deep learning models for IoT network monitoring, focusing on achieving a symmetrical balance between scalability and computational efficiency, which is essential for real-time anomaly detection in dynamic networks. We propose two novel hybrid optimization methods—Hybrid Grey Wolf Optimization with Particle Swarm Optimization (HGWOPSO) and Hybrid World Cup Optimization with Harris Hawks Optimization (HWCOAHHO)—designed to symmetrically balance global exploration and local exploitation, thereby enhancing model training and adaptation in IoT environments. These methods leverage complementary search behaviors, where symmetry between global and local search processes enhances convergence speed and detection accuracy. The proposed approaches are validated using real-world IoT datasets, demonstrating significant improvements in anomaly detection accuracy, scalability, and adaptability compared to state-of-the-art techniques. Specifically, HGWOPSO combines the symmetrical hierarchy-driven leadership of Grey Wolves with the velocity updates of Particle Swarm Optimization, while HWCOAHHO synergizes the dynamic exploration strategies of Harris Hawks with the competition-driven optimization of the World Cup algorithm, ensuring balanced search and decision-making processes. Performance evaluation using benchmark functions and real-world IoT network data highlights superior accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score compared to traditional methods. To further enhance decision-making, a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) framework incorporating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and TOPSIS is employed to symmetrically evaluate and rank the proposed methods. Results indicate that HWCOAHHO achieves the most optimal balance between accuracy and precision, followed closely by HGWOPSO, while traditional methods like FFNNs and MLPs show lower effectiveness in real-time anomaly detection. The symmetry-driven approach of these hybrid algorithms ensures robust, adaptive, and scalable monitoring solutions for IoT networks characterized by dynamic traffic patterns and evolving anomalies, thus ensuring real-time network stability and data integrity. The findings have substantial implications for smart cities, industrial automation, and healthcare IoT applications, where symmetrical optimization between detection performance and computational efficiency is crucial for ensuring optimal and reliable network monitoring. This work lays the groundwork for further research on hybrid optimization techniques and deep learning, emphasizing the role of symmetry in enhancing the efficiency and resilience of IoT network monitoring systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Computer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The methodology phases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Illustration of synthetic and real-world IoT network data characteristics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Architecture of the Feedforward Neural Network (FFNN).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Architecture of CNN and pooling layers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Architecture of the MLP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparative Confusion Matrices for Deep Learning Models and Optimization Techniques (FFNNs, CNNs, MLPs, HGWOPSO, HWCOAHHO) in IoT Network Monitoring. (<b>A</b>) Training Progress of Deep Learning Model for IoT Network Monitoring Using HGWOPSO and HWCOAHHO Optimization Techniques. (<b>B</b>) Confusion Matrix for Deep Learning Model Performance in IoT Network Monitoring Using HGWOPSO and HWCOAHHO Optimization. (<b>C</b>) FFNNs Confusion Matrix for Performance Evaluation in IoT Network Monitoring. (<b>D</b>) MLP Confusion Matrix for Performance Evaluation in IoT Network Monitoring. (<b>E</b>) CNNs Confusion Matrix for Performance Evaluation in IoT Network Monitoring. (<b>F</b>) HGWOPSO Confusion Matrix for Performance Evaluation in IoT Network Monitoring. (<b>G</b>) HWCOAHHO Confusion Matrix for Performance Evaluation in IoT Network Monitoring.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Comparative Confusion Matrices for Deep Learning Models and Optimization Techniques (FFNNs, CNNs, MLPs, HGWOPSO, HWCOAHHO) in IoT Network Monitoring. (<b>A</b>) Training Progress of Deep Learning Model for IoT Network Monitoring Using HGWOPSO and HWCOAHHO Optimization Techniques. (<b>B</b>) Confusion Matrix for Deep Learning Model Performance in IoT Network Monitoring Using HGWOPSO and HWCOAHHO Optimization. (<b>C</b>) FFNNs Confusion Matrix for Performance Evaluation in IoT Network Monitoring. (<b>D</b>) MLP Confusion Matrix for Performance Evaluation in IoT Network Monitoring. (<b>E</b>) CNNs Confusion Matrix for Performance Evaluation in IoT Network Monitoring. (<b>F</b>) HGWOPSO Confusion Matrix for Performance Evaluation in IoT Network Monitoring. (<b>G</b>) HWCOAHHO Confusion Matrix for Performance Evaluation in IoT Network Monitoring.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Comparative Confusion Matrices for Deep Learning Models and Optimization Techniques (FFNNs, CNNs, MLPs, HGWOPSO, HWCOAHHO) in IoT Network Monitoring. (<b>A</b>) Training Progress of Deep Learning Model for IoT Network Monitoring Using HGWOPSO and HWCOAHHO Optimization Techniques. (<b>B</b>) Confusion Matrix for Deep Learning Model Performance in IoT Network Monitoring Using HGWOPSO and HWCOAHHO Optimization. (<b>C</b>) FFNNs Confusion Matrix for Performance Evaluation in IoT Network Monitoring. (<b>D</b>) MLP Confusion Matrix for Performance Evaluation in IoT Network Monitoring. (<b>E</b>) CNNs Confusion Matrix for Performance Evaluation in IoT Network Monitoring. (<b>F</b>) HGWOPSO Confusion Matrix for Performance Evaluation in IoT Network Monitoring. (<b>G</b>) HWCOAHHO Confusion Matrix for Performance Evaluation in IoT Network Monitoring.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Comparative Confusion Matrices for Deep Learning Models and Optimization Techniques (FFNNs, CNNs, MLPs, HGWOPSO, HWCOAHHO) in IoT Network Monitoring. (<b>A</b>) Training Progress of Deep Learning Model for IoT Network Monitoring Using HGWOPSO and HWCOAHHO Optimization Techniques. (<b>B</b>) Confusion Matrix for Deep Learning Model Performance in IoT Network Monitoring Using HGWOPSO and HWCOAHHO Optimization. (<b>C</b>) FFNNs Confusion Matrix for Performance Evaluation in IoT Network Monitoring. (<b>D</b>) MLP Confusion Matrix for Performance Evaluation in IoT Network Monitoring. (<b>E</b>) CNNs Confusion Matrix for Performance Evaluation in IoT Network Monitoring. (<b>F</b>) HGWOPSO Confusion Matrix for Performance Evaluation in IoT Network Monitoring. (<b>G</b>) HWCOAHHO Confusion Matrix for Performance Evaluation in IoT Network Monitoring.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comprehensive Confusion Matrix Comparison of Deep Learning Models for IoT Network Monitoring Using HGWOPSO and HWCOAHHO Optimization Techniques. (<b>A</b>) Comparative Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for IoT Network Monitoring Using HGWOPSO and HWCOAHHO Optimization Techniques. (<b>B</b>) Comparative Confusion Matrices for Deep Learning Models in IoT Network Monitoring Using HGWOPSO and HWCOAHHO Optimization Techniques.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Comprehensive Confusion Matrix Comparison of Deep Learning Models for IoT Network Monitoring Using HGWOPSO and HWCOAHHO Optimization Techniques. (<b>A</b>) Comparative Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for IoT Network Monitoring Using HGWOPSO and HWCOAHHO Optimization Techniques. (<b>B</b>) Comparative Confusion Matrices for Deep Learning Models in IoT Network Monitoring Using HGWOPSO and HWCOAHHO Optimization Techniques.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Benchmark Function of Deep Learning Models for IoT Network Monitoring Using HGWOPSO and HWCOAHHO Optimization Techniques.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 3458 KiB  
Article
Organic Dye Photodegradation Using Niobium-Alkali Perovskite Photocatalysts: The Effect of the Alkali
by Mirtha Z. L. L. Ribeiro, Igor F. Gomes, Edher Z. Herrera, Alexandre Mello, Marília O. Guimarães, Patrícia A. Carneiro, Débora C. M. Rodrigues, Wanderlã L. Scopel, Rodrigo G. Amorim and Mauro C. Ribeiro
Reactions 2025, 6(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/reactions6010018 - 4 Mar 2025
Viewed by 198
Abstract
This study combines experimental and density functional theory (DFT) to evaluate the influence of alkaline cation characteristics on the electronic structure and photodegradation efficacy of organic dyes in MNbO3 (M = Na, K) perovskites. The X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) and X-ray Absorption [...] Read more.
This study combines experimental and density functional theory (DFT) to evaluate the influence of alkaline cation characteristics on the electronic structure and photodegradation efficacy of organic dyes in MNbO3 (M = Na, K) perovskites. The X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) and X-ray Absorption Near Edge Spectroscopy (XANES) spectra at the Nb edge of the Perovskites were employed to characterize its chemical and structural properties. The DFT calculations were carried out to simulate XANES spectra as well as the structural and electrical properties of KNbO3 and NaNbO3. Our results show that the simulated and experimental XANES spectra are similar, indicating that the computational simulations were able to capture the local structure of the niobate samples. In addition, a photocatalytic experiment was conducted to benchmark the methylene blue consumption efficiency between different niobates. The findings demonstrated that KNbO3 is more efficient than NaNbO3 for methylene blue UV photocatalytic degradation, which is associated with their electronic properties. This arises as a direct result of the variably deformed NbO6 octahedra resulting from the different alkali used. Our findings facilitate the advancement of stable and abundantly available photocatalysts, which may be employed for energy-intensive processes such as the mineralization of organic water pollutants and hydrogen production by water splitting. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Temperature program used in the niobate synthesis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Rietveld refined XRD patterns of the alkaline niobate photocatalysts, considering orthorhombic NaNbO<sub>3</sub> (ICSD 97669) (<b>A</b>) and KNbO<sub>3</sub> (ICSD 39869) (<b>B</b>) phases as model structures. Insets: 38–90° region of the patterns to emphasize the match between the experimental and theoretical patterns. NiO phase-related peaks are indicated by asterisks (*).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>3D projections of the Na (<b>A</b>) and K (<b>B</b>) niobate orthorhombic unit cells, based on the Rietveld refined cell parameters and atomic positions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Nb K-edge XANES spectra for synthesized Niobates. In top and lower panels are displayed the experimental and theoretical XANES spectra for NaNbO<sub>3</sub> and KNbO<sub>3</sub>, respectively. The experimental spectra have been shifted in energy to allow for an overlap between the main peak of the XANES experimental and theoretical spectra.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>XPS spectra related to Nb 3d (<b>A</b>); O 1s (<b>B</b>); C 1s (<b>C</b>); Ni 2p (<b>D</b>); and survey (<b>E</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Measurements of UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (n = 1/2) for NaNbO<sub>3</sub> and KNbO<sub>3</sub>. UV-vis spectra (<b>A</b>) and Kubelka–Munk plot (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Projected density of states for Niobates, considering GGA-PBE approximation. The total density of state and p-projections of (<b>A</b>) KNbO<sub>3</sub> and (<b>C</b>) NaNbO<sub>3</sub>. Nb-d orbital projection for (<b>B</b>) KNbO<sub>3</sub> and (<b>D</b>) NaNbO<sub>3</sub>. The Fermi level is set at zero.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Methylene blue UV-vis spectrum with the electronic and vibrational transition related bands located at 293 nm and c.a. 650 nm, respectively. The peak located at 664 nm was used to follow MB photodecomposition in this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>UV-vis spectra of the aliquotes obtained during MB conversion experiments (<b>A</b>). MB conversion for Na (red line) and K (blue line) containing niobates, as a function of time (<b>B</b>). The control test performed without any catalyst (black line) is presented for comparison.</p>
Full article ">
29 pages, 6798 KiB  
Article
A Coupled Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator–Backpropagation Model for Estimating Evapotranspiration in Xizang Plateau Irrigation Districts with Reduced Meteorological Variables
by Qiang Meng, Jingxia Liu, Fengrui Li, Peng Chen, Junzeng Xu, Yawei Li, Tangzhe Nie and Yu Han
Agriculture 2025, 15(5), 544; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15050544 - 3 Mar 2025
Viewed by 303
Abstract
This study addresses the challenge of estimating reference crop evapotranspiration (ETO) in Xizang Plateau irrigation districts with limited meteorological data by proposing a coupled LASSO-BP model that integrates LASSO regression with a BP neural network. The model was applied to three [...] Read more.
This study addresses the challenge of estimating reference crop evapotranspiration (ETO) in Xizang Plateau irrigation districts with limited meteorological data by proposing a coupled LASSO-BP model that integrates LASSO regression with a BP neural network. The model was applied to three irrigation districts: Moda (MD), Jiangbei (JB), and Manla (ML). Using ETO values calculated by the FAO-56 Penman–Monteith (FAO-56PM) model as a benchmark, the performance and applicability of the LASSO-BP model were assessed. Short-term ETO predictions for the three districts were also conducted using the mean-generating function optimal subset regression algorithm. The results revealed significant multicollinearity among six meteorological factors (maximum temperature, minimum temperature, average temperature, average relative humidity, sunshine duration, and average wind speed), as identified through tolerance, variance inflation factor (VIF), and eigenvalue analysis. The LASSO-BP model effectively captured the interannual variation of ETO, accurately identifying peaks and troughs, with trends closely aligned with the FAO-56PM model. The model demonstrated strong performance across all three districts, with evaluation metrics showing MAE, RMSE, NSE, and R2 values ranging from 4.26 to 9.48 mm·a−1, 5.91 to 11.78 mm·a−1, 0.92 to 0.96, and 0.82 to 0.94, respectively. Prediction results indicated a statistically insignificant declining trend in annual ETO across the three districts over the study period. Overall, the LASSO-BP model is a reliable and accurate tool for estimating ETO in Xizang Plateau irrigation districts with limited meteorological data. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Water Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The location of the irrigation districts on the Xizang Plateau. A1, A2, and A3 correspond to the Moda, Jiangbei, and Manla irrigation districts, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Modeling framework of the LASSO-BP model for simulating ET<sub>O</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Modeling framework of ET<sub>O</sub> prediction using the LASSO-BP model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison between the LASSO-BP simulation results and the FAO-56PM-calculated values for ET<sub>O</sub> in the JB irrigation district. (Note: the data required for the ET<sub>O</sub> calculation by the FAO-56PM and LASSO-BP modeling mode in the Figure (<b>a</b>) are from the 1991–2016 daily scale <span class="html-italic">U</span> and <span class="html-italic">SH</span> at the Gonggar site. The “*” symbol indicates a significant correlation at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 level. Figure (<b>b</b>) presents three error metrics—<span class="html-italic">MAE</span>, <span class="html-italic">RMSE</span>, and <span class="html-italic">NSE</span>—used to evaluate the simulation performance of the LASSO-BP model).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison between the LASSO-BP simulation results and the FAO-56PM-calculated values for ET<sub>O</sub> in the MD irrigation district. (Note: the data required for calculating ET<sub>O</sub> using the FAO-56PM and LASSO-BP models in the Figure (<b>a</b>) are derived from daily scale averages of the <span class="html-italic">RH</span>, <span class="html-italic">T<sub>min</sub></span>, <span class="html-italic">U</span>, and <span class="html-italic">SH</span> recorded at the Mozhugongka station from 1991 to 2016. The “*” symbol indicates a significant correlation at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 level. Figure (<b>b</b>) presents three error metrics—<span class="html-italic">MAE</span>, <span class="html-italic">RMSE</span>, and <span class="html-italic">NSE</span>—used to evaluate the simulation performance of the LASSO-BP model).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison between the LASSO-BP simulation results and the FAO-56PM-calculated values for ET<sub>O</sub> in the ML irrigation district. (Note: the data required for calculating ET<sub>O</sub> using the FAO-56PM and LASSO-BP models in the Figure (<b>a</b>) are derived from daily scale averages of <span class="html-italic">RH</span>, <span class="html-italic">T<sub>ave</sub></span>, <span class="html-italic">U</span>, and <span class="html-italic">SH</span> recorded at the Gyantse station from 1991 to 2016. The “*” symbol indicates a significant correlation at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 level. Figure (<b>b</b>) presents three error metrics—<span class="html-italic">MAE</span>, <span class="html-italic">RMSE</span>, and <span class="html-italic">NSE</span>—used to evaluate the simulation performance of the LASSO-BP model).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Fitting of MGF-OSR-simulated and observed values of meteorological factors in the JB irrigation district. (Note: in Figures (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), the dashed line between 2010 and 2013 marks the boundary between the calibration period (1991–2011) and the validation period (2012–2016). The blue solid squares represent observed values, while the red dashed circles represent model-simulated values).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Fitting of MGF-OSR-simulated and observed values of meteorological factors in the MD irrigation district. (Note: in Figures (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>), the dashed line between 2010 and 2013 marks the boundary between the calibration period (1991–2011) and the validation period (2012–2016). The blue solid squares represent observed values, while the red dashed circles represent model-simulated values).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Fitting of MGF-OSR-simulated and observed values of meteorological factors in the MD irrigation district. (Note: in Figures (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>), the dashed line between 2010 and 2013 marks the boundary between the calibration period (1991–2011) and the validation period (2012–2016). The blue solid squares represent observed values, while the red dashed circles represent model-simulated values).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Fitting of MGF-OSR-simulated and observed values of meteorological factors in the ML irrigation district. (Note: in Figures (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>), the dashed line between 2010 and 2013 marks the boundary between the calibration period (1991–2011) and the validation period (2012–2016). The blue solid squares represent observed values, while the red dashed circles represent model-simulated values).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Annual ET<sub>O</sub> variations in each irrigation district during the prediction period. The numbers indicated by the arrows in Figures (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) represent the ET<sub>O</sub> projections for the JB, MD, and ML irrigation districts from 2017 to 2021, respectively.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 688 KiB  
Article
Adversarial Range Gate Pull-Off Jamming Against Tracking Radar
by Yuanhang Wang, Yi Han and Yi Jiang
Sensors 2025, 25(5), 1553; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25051553 - 3 Mar 2025
Viewed by 178
Abstract
Range gate pull-off (RGPO) jamming is an effective method for track deception aimed at radar systems. Nevertheless, enhancing the effectiveness of the jamming strategy continues to pose challenges, restricting the RGPO jamming method from achieving its maximum potential. This paper focuses on addressing [...] Read more.
Range gate pull-off (RGPO) jamming is an effective method for track deception aimed at radar systems. Nevertheless, enhancing the effectiveness of the jamming strategy continues to pose challenges, restricting the RGPO jamming method from achieving its maximum potential. This paper focuses on addressing the problem of optimizing the strategy for white-box RGPO jamming, serving as a foundational step toward quantitative optimization research on RGPO jamming strategies. In the white-box scenario, it is presumed that the jammer has full knowledge of the target radar’s tracking system, encompassing both the choice of tracking method and its parameter configurations. The intricate interactions between the jammer and the tracking radar introduce three primary challenges: (1) Formulating an algebraic expression for the objective function of the jamming strategy optimization is nontrivial; (2) Direct observation of jamming effects from the target radar is challenging; (3) Noise renders the jamming outcomes unpredictable. To tackle these challenges, this study formulates the optimization of the RGPO jamming strategy as an adversarial stochastic simulation optimization (ASSO) problem and introduces a novel solution for the white-box RGPO jamming strategy optimization: a local simulation-assisted particle swarm optimization algorithm with an equal resampling scheme (PSO-ER). The PSO-ER algorithm searches for optimal jamming strategies while utilizing a localized simulation of the tracking radar to evaluate the effectiveness of candidate jamming strategies. Experiments conducted on four benchmark cases confirm that the proposed approach is capable of generating well-tuned strategies for white-box RGPO jamming. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radar Target Detection, Imaging and Recognition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Diagram of RGPO jamming.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of measurement verification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic diagram of jamming result.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Generic diagram of the white-box RGPO jamming strategy optimization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The average <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> <mo>[</mo> <mi>r</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>φ</mi> <mo>)</mo> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> performance of strategies obtained by the proposed method in comparison with the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> <mo>[</mo> <mi>r</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>φ</mi> <mo>)</mo> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> performance of different UV-RGPO and UA-RGPO strategies on the CV benchmark with various <span class="html-italic">K</span>. (<b>a1</b>) Proposed method vs. UV-RGPO, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>b1</b>) Proposed method vs. UA-RGPO, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>a2</b>) Proposed method vs. UV-RGPO, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>15</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>b2</b>) Proposed method vs. UA-RGPO, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>15</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>a3</b>) Proposed method vs. UV-RGPO, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>20</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>b3</b>) Proposed method vs. UA-RGPO, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>20</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The average <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> <mo>[</mo> <mi>r</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>φ</mi> <mo>)</mo> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> performance of strategies obtained by the proposed method in comparison with the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> <mo>[</mo> <mi>r</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>φ</mi> <mo>)</mo> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> performance of different UV-RGPO and UA-RGPO strategies on the CA benchmark. (<b>a</b>) Proposed method vs. UV-RGPO; (<b>b</b>) Proposed method vs. UA-RGPO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The average <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> <mo>[</mo> <mi>r</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>φ</mi> <mo>)</mo> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> performance of strategies obtained by the proposed method in comparison with the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> <mo>[</mo> <mi>r</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>φ</mi> <mo>)</mo> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> performance of different UV-RGPO and UA-RGPO strategies on the CT benchmark. (<b>a</b>) Proposed method vs. UV-RGPO; (<b>b</b>) Proposed method vs. UA-RGPO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The average <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> <mo>[</mo> <mi>r</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>φ</mi> <mo>)</mo> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> performance of strategies obtained by the proposed method in comparison with the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> <mo>[</mo> <mi>r</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>φ</mi> <mo>)</mo> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> performance of different UV-RGPO and UA-RGPO strategies on the RV benchmark. (<b>a</b>) Proposed method vs. UV-RGPO; (<b>b</b>) Proposed method vs. UA-RGPO.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 39568 KiB  
Article
Edge Detection Attention Module in Pure Vision Transformer for Low-Dose X-Ray Computed Tomography Image Denoising
by Luella Marcos, Paul Babyn and Javad Alirezaie
Algorithms 2025, 18(3), 134; https://doi.org/10.3390/a18030134 - 3 Mar 2025
Viewed by 278
Abstract
X-ray computed tomography (CT) is vital for medical diagnostics, but frequent radiation exposure raises concerns, driving the adoption of low-dose CT (LDCT) to mitigate risks. However, LDCT often introduces noise, compromising diagnostic accuracy. This paper proposes a pure vision transformer (PViT) for LDCT [...] Read more.
X-ray computed tomography (CT) is vital for medical diagnostics, but frequent radiation exposure raises concerns, driving the adoption of low-dose CT (LDCT) to mitigate risks. However, LDCT often introduces noise, compromising diagnostic accuracy. This paper proposes a pure vision transformer (PViT) for LDCT denoising, enhanced with a gradient–Laplacian attention module (GLAM) to improve edge preservation and fine structural detail reconstruction. The model’s robustness was validated across five diverse datasets (piglet, head, abdomen, chest, thoracic), demonstrating consistent performance in preserving anatomical structures. Extensive ablation studies on attention configurations and loss functions further substantiated the contributions of each module. Quantitative evaluation using PSNR and SSIM, alongside radiologist assessment, confirmed significant noise suppression and sharper anatomical boundaries, particularly in regions with fine details such as organ interfaces and bone structures. Additionally, in benchmark comparisons against state-of-the-art LDCT models (RED-CNN, TED-Net, DSC-GAN, DRL-EMP) and traditional methods (BM3D), the model exhibited lower parameter and stable training performance. These findings highlight the model’s robustness, efficiency, and clinical applicability, making it a promising solution for improving LDCT image quality while maintaining computational efficiency. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Not-well-preserved anatomical details in the highlighted blue ROI, produced using a pure vision transformer for LDCT denoising. Image generated from running the PViT model in [<a href="#B19-algorithms-18-00134" class="html-bibr">19</a>] using the piglet dataset for this study. (<b>a</b>) Piglet LDCT (15 mAs) slice. (<b>b</b>) Piglet NDCT (300 mAs) slice. (<b>c</b>) Generated output from PViT.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Pure transformer block for LDCT denoising with the integration of gradient–Laplacian attention module.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Attention modules in the pure vision transformer for LDCT denoising. (<b>a</b>) Multi-head self attention module for PViT. (<b>b</b>) Proposed gradient–Laplacian attention module for PViT.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Edge enhancement at each upsampling and downsampling checkpoint labeled in <a href="#algorithms-18-00134-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a> using different filters in the attention module. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) The feature maps generated from checkpoint at the encoder; (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) the feature maps generated from the checkpoint at the decoder.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Benchmark test visual results for piglet data: (<b>a</b>) input LDCT image reference with blue ROI, (<b>b</b>) ROI of LDCT image, (<b>c</b>) ROI of NDCT image, and ROI of output image using (<b>d</b>) RED-CNN, (<b>e</b>) PViT, (<b>f</b>) DSC-GAN, (<b>g</b>) DRLEMP, (<b>h</b>)TED-Net, (<b>i</b>) GLAM-PViT.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Loss, PSNR, and SSIM trend over 150 epochs using piglet dataset. (<b>a</b>) Loss. (<b>b</b>) PSNR. (<b>c</b>) SSIM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>PSNR and SSIM trend over 150 epochs using thoracic dataset. (<b>a</b>) Loss. (<b>b</b>) PSNR. (<b>c</b>) SSIM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Benchmark test visual results for thoracic data: (<b>a</b>) input LDCT image reference with blue ROI, (<b>b</b>) ROI of LDCT image, (<b>c</b>) ROI of NDCT image, and ROI of output image using (<b>d</b>) RED-CNN, (<b>e</b>) PViT, (<b>f</b>) DSC-GAN, (<b>g</b>) DRLEMP, (<b>h</b>) TED-Net, (<b>i</b>) GLAM-PViT.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>PSNR and SSIM trend over 150 epochs using head dataset. (<b>a</b>) Loss. (<b>b</b>) PSNR. (<b>c</b>) SSIM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Benchmark test visual results for dead data: (<b>a</b>) input LDCT image reference with blue ROI, (<b>b</b>) ROI of LDCT image, (<b>c</b>) ROI of NDCT image, and ROI of output image using (<b>d</b>) RED-CNN, (<b>e</b>) PViT, (<b>f</b>) DSC-GAN, (<b>g</b>) DRLEMP, (<b>h</b>) TED-Net, (<b>i</b>) GLAM-PViT.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>PSNR and SSIM trend over 150 epochs using abdomen dataset. (<b>a</b>) Loss. (<b>b</b>) PSNR. (<b>c</b>) SSIM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Benchmark test visual results for abdomen data: (<b>a</b>) input LDCT image reference with blue ROI, (<b>b</b>) ROI of LDCT image, (<b>c</b>) ROI of NDCT image, and ROI of output image using (<b>d</b>) RED-CNN, (<b>e</b>) PViT, (<b>f</b>) DSC-GAN, (<b>g</b>) DRLEMP, (<b>h</b>) TED-Net, (<b>i</b>) GLAM-PViT.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>PSNR and SSIM trend over 150 epochs using chest dataset. (<b>a</b>) Loss. (<b>b</b>) PSNR. (<b>c</b>) SSIM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Benchmark test visual results for chest data: (<b>a</b>) input LDCT image reference with blue ROI, (<b>b</b>) ROI of LDCT image, (<b>c</b>) ROI of NDCT image, and ROI of output image using (<b>d</b>) RED-CNN, (<b>e</b>) PViT, (<b>f</b>) DSC-GAN, (<b>g</b>) DRLEMP, (<b>h</b>) TED-Net, (<b>i</b>) GLAM-PViT.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 72606 KiB  
Article
Classification of Large Scale Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Images Based on LS3EU-Net++
by Hengqian Zhao, Zhengpu Lu, Shasha Sun, Pan Wang, Tianyu Jia, Yu Xie and Fei Xu
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(5), 872; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17050872 - 28 Feb 2025
Viewed by 160
Abstract
Aimed at the limitation that existing hyperspectral classification methods were mainly oriented to small-scale images, this paper proposed a new large-scale hyperspectral remote sensing image classification method, LS3EU-Net++ (Lightweight Encoder and Integrated Spatial Spectral Squeeze and Excitation U-Net++). The method optimized the U-Net++ [...] Read more.
Aimed at the limitation that existing hyperspectral classification methods were mainly oriented to small-scale images, this paper proposed a new large-scale hyperspectral remote sensing image classification method, LS3EU-Net++ (Lightweight Encoder and Integrated Spatial Spectral Squeeze and Excitation U-Net++). The method optimized the U-Net++ architecture by introducing a lightweight encoder and combining the Spatial Spectral Squeeze and Excitation (S3E) Attention Module, which maintained the powerful feature extraction capability while significantly reducing the training cost. In addition, the model employed a composite loss function combining focal loss and Jaccard loss, which could focus more on difficult samples, thus improving pixel-level accuracy and classification results. To solve the sample imbalance problem in hyperspectral images, this paper also proposed a data enhancement strategy based on “copy–paste”, which effectively increased the diversity of the training dataset. Experiments on large-scale satellite hyperspectral remote sensing images from the Zhuhai-1 satellite demonstrated that LS3EU-Net++ exhibited superiority over the U-Net++ benchmark. Specifically, the overall accuracy (OA) was improved by 5.35%, and the mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) by 12.4%. These findings suggested that the proposed method provided a robust solution for large-scale hyperspectral image classification, effectively balancing accuracy and computational efficiency. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Hyperspectral Imaging and Signal Processing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of the proposed method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Percentage of samples per class in a large-scale dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Data-enhanced samples and their corresponding original samples: (<b>a</b>) is the original sample of (<b>d</b>), (<b>b</b>) is the original sample of (<b>e</b>), and (<b>c</b>) is the original sample of (<b>f</b>). The red boxes show the portion of the bare soil that changed after the data enhancement was performed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Rate of change of percentage of samples from each class after data augmentation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic diagram of a common residual CNN (<b>a</b>) and light-weighted MobileNetV2 (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Schematic diagram of the S3E model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>True color display of one of the sub-images and its corresponding ground truth of LHSI-A.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Results of the test set experiment, where green is vegetation, red is buildings, blue is water, yellow is bare soil, and black is background: (<b>f</b>–<b>j</b>) correspond to the labeled true-color display plots for (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>), respectively, and (<b>k</b>–<b>o</b>) correspond to the predicted plots for (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>), respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>True color display (<b>a</b>), ground truth map (<b>b</b>), and the predicted map of LS3EU-Net++ on the LHSI-B dataset (<b>c</b>), where green is vegetation, red is buildings, blue is water, and yellow is bare soil.</p>
Full article ">
34 pages, 17954 KiB  
Article
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Path Planning Method Based on Improved Dung Beetle Optimization Algorithm
by Fengjun Lv, Yongbo Jian, Kai Yuan and Yubin Lu
Symmetry 2025, 17(3), 367; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17030367 - 28 Feb 2025
Viewed by 257
Abstract
To address the problem of UAV path planning in complex mountainous terrains, this paper comprehensively considers constraints such as natural mountain and obstacle collision threats, the shortest path, and flight altitude. We propose a more practical UAV path planning model that better reflects [...] Read more.
To address the problem of UAV path planning in complex mountainous terrains, this paper comprehensively considers constraints such as natural mountain and obstacle collision threats, the shortest path, and flight altitude. We propose a more practical UAV path planning model that better reflects the actual UAV path planning situation in complex mountainous areas. In order to solve this model, this paper improves the traditional dung beetle optimization (DBO) algorithm and proposes an improved dung beetle optimization (IDBO) algorithm. The IDBO algorithm optimizes the population initialization method based on the concept of symmetry, ensuring that the population is more evenly distributed within the solution space. Additionally, the algorithm introduces a sine–cosine function-based movement strategy, inspired by the symmetry principle, to enhance the search efficiency of individual population members. Furthermore, a population evolution strategy is incorporated to prevent the algorithm from getting stuck in local optima. To demonstrate the algorithm’s performance, tests were conducted using 23 commonly used benchmark functions provided by the CEC 2005 competition and six commonly used engineering problem models provided by the CEC 2020 competition. The results indicate that IDBO significantly outperforms DBO in terms of convergence performance, effectively solving various engineering optimization problems. Finally, experimental tests under three different threat scenarios show that the proposed IDBO algorithm has scientific validity when applied to UAV path planning. This solution method effectively reduces UAV flight energy consumption costs and obstacle collision threats while improving the efficiency and accuracy of UAV path planning. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry in Mathematical Optimization Algorithm and Its Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Three-dimensional terrain map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Planar projection of obstacle threat area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of population initialization effects.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Diagram of the rolling dung beetle population evolution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Flowchart of the improved dung beetle optimization algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Convergence trend of unimodal test functions: (<b>a</b>) Sphere Function, (<b>b</b>) Schwefel’s Problem 2.22, (<b>c</b>) Schwefel’s Problem 1.2, (<b>d</b>) Schwefel’s Problem 2.21, (<b>e</b>) Generalized Rosenbrock’s Function, (<b>f</b>) Step Function.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Convergence trend of multimodal test functions: (<b>a</b>) Generalized Schwefel’s Problem 2.26, (<b>b</b>) Generalized Rastrigin’s Function, (<b>c</b>) Ackley’s Function, (<b>d</b>) Generalized Griewank’s Function, (<b>e</b>) Generalized Penalized Function 1, (<b>f</b>) Generalized Penalized Function 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Convergence trend of composite benchmark test functions: (<b>a</b>) Shekel’s Foxholes Function, (<b>b</b>) Kowalik’s Function, (<b>c</b>) Six-Hump Camel-Back Function, (<b>d</b>) Branin Function, (<b>e</b>) Goldstein–Price Function, (<b>f</b>) Hartman’s Family, (<b>g</b>) Hartman’s Family 2, (<b>h</b>) Shekel’s Family 1, (<b>i</b>) Shekel’s Family 2, and (<b>j</b>) Shekel’s Family 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Convergence trends of CEC 2020 models: (<b>a</b>) Shifted and Rotated Bent Cigar Function, (<b>b</b>) Shifted and Rotated Lunacek bi-Rastrigin Function, (<b>c</b>) Expanded Rosenbrock’s plus Griewangk’s Function, (<b>d</b>) Composition Function 1, (<b>e</b>) Composition Function 2, (<b>f</b>) Composition Function 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Convergence trends of CEC 2020 models: (<b>a</b>) Shifted and Rotated Bent Cigar Function, (<b>b</b>) Shifted and Rotated Lunacek bi-Rastrigin Function, (<b>c</b>) Expanded Rosenbrock’s plus Griewangk’s Function, (<b>d</b>) Composition Function 1, (<b>e</b>) Composition Function 2, (<b>f</b>) Composition Function 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Experimental scene 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Experimental scene 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Experimental scene 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Experiment 1—algorithm iteration chart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Experiment 1—UAV path 3D view. (<b>a</b>) 3D view—overall, (<b>b</b>) 3D view—MVO, (<b>c</b>) 3D view—ALO, (<b>d</b>) 3D view—WOA, (<b>e</b>) 3D view—DBO, (<b>f</b>) 3D view—IDBO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14 Cont.
<p>Experiment 1—UAV path 3D view. (<b>a</b>) 3D view—overall, (<b>b</b>) 3D view—MVO, (<b>c</b>) 3D view—ALO, (<b>d</b>) 3D view—WOA, (<b>e</b>) 3D view—DBO, (<b>f</b>) 3D view—IDBO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Experiment 1—UAV path top-down view. (<b>a</b>) Top-down view—overall, (<b>b</b>) top-down view—MVO, (<b>c</b>) top-down view—ALO, (<b>d</b>) top-down view—WOA, (<b>e</b>) top-down view—DBO, (<b>f</b>) top-down view—IDBO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15 Cont.
<p>Experiment 1—UAV path top-down view. (<b>a</b>) Top-down view—overall, (<b>b</b>) top-down view—MVO, (<b>c</b>) top-down view—ALO, (<b>d</b>) top-down view—WOA, (<b>e</b>) top-down view—DBO, (<b>f</b>) top-down view—IDBO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Experiment 1—UAV path side view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Experiment 2—algorithm iteration chart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Experiment 2—UAV path 3D view. (<b>a</b>) 3D view—overall, (<b>b</b>) 3D view—MVO, (<b>c</b>) 3D view—ALO, (<b>d</b>) 3D view—WOA, (<b>e</b>) 3D view—DBO (<b>f</b>) 3D view—IDBO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18 Cont.
<p>Experiment 2—UAV path 3D view. (<b>a</b>) 3D view—overall, (<b>b</b>) 3D view—MVO, (<b>c</b>) 3D view—ALO, (<b>d</b>) 3D view—WOA, (<b>e</b>) 3D view—DBO (<b>f</b>) 3D view—IDBO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Experiment 2—UAV path top-down view. (<b>a</b>) Top-down view—overall, (<b>b</b>) top-down view—MVO, (<b>c</b>) top-down view—ALO, (<b>d</b>) top-down view—WOA, (<b>e</b>) top-down view—DBO, (<b>f</b>) top-down view—IDBO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19 Cont.
<p>Experiment 2—UAV path top-down view. (<b>a</b>) Top-down view—overall, (<b>b</b>) top-down view—MVO, (<b>c</b>) top-down view—ALO, (<b>d</b>) top-down view—WOA, (<b>e</b>) top-down view—DBO, (<b>f</b>) top-down view—IDBO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Experiment 2—UAV path side view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Experiment 3—algorithm iteration chart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Experiment 3—UAV path 3D view. (<b>a</b>) 3D view—overall, (<b>b</b>) 3D view—MVO, (<b>c</b>) 3D view—ALO, (<b>d</b>) 3D view—WOA, (<b>e</b>) 3D view—DBO, (<b>f</b>) 3D view—IDBO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22 Cont.
<p>Experiment 3—UAV path 3D view. (<b>a</b>) 3D view—overall, (<b>b</b>) 3D view—MVO, (<b>c</b>) 3D view—ALO, (<b>d</b>) 3D view—WOA, (<b>e</b>) 3D view—DBO, (<b>f</b>) 3D view—IDBO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Experiment 3—UAV path top-down view. (<b>a</b>) Top-down view—overall, (<b>b</b>) top-down view—MVO, (<b>c</b>) top-down view—ALO, (<b>d</b>) top-down view—WOA, (<b>e</b>) top-down view—DBO, (<b>f</b>) top-down view—IDBO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23 Cont.
<p>Experiment 3—UAV path top-down view. (<b>a</b>) Top-down view—overall, (<b>b</b>) top-down view—MVO, (<b>c</b>) top-down view—ALO, (<b>d</b>) top-down view—WOA, (<b>e</b>) top-down view—DBO, (<b>f</b>) top-down view—IDBO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Experiment 3—UAV path side view.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop