[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (14)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = L-THIA model

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 9274 KiB  
Article
Long-Term Hydrological Impacts of Land Use Change and Evaluation of Best Management Practices from 2000 to 2020 in the Hulan River Basin, Northeast China
by Hongkuan Hui, Min Wang, Haitao Zhou, Dan Su and Hede Gong
Water 2024, 16(24), 3669; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16243669 - 20 Dec 2024
Viewed by 704
Abstract
The alterations in runoff resulting from changes in land use and land cover (LULC) were the primary influencing factors contributing to non-point source pollution (NPS). In order to evaluate the long-term hydrological consequences of LULC for the purposes of land use optimization in [...] Read more.
The alterations in runoff resulting from changes in land use and land cover (LULC) were the primary influencing factors contributing to non-point source pollution (NPS). In order to evaluate the long-term hydrological consequences of LULC for the purposes of land use optimization in the Hulan River Basin, Northeast China, the validated Long-term Hydrological Impact Assessment (L-THIA) model was employed to simulate the spatiotemporal distribution of total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) non-point source (NPS) loads from 2000 to 2020. Additionally, the load per unit area index (LPUAI) method was utilized to identify critical source areas. The findings indicated that the regions with elevated pollution levels were predominantly situated in areas designated for agricultural and construction activities. The greatest contributor to nitrogen and phosphorus loads was agricultural land. There were clear increases in both TN and TP during the study period, with increases of 51.73% and 55.56%, respectively. As a consequence of the process of urbanization in the basin, the area of land devoted to construction activities increased, reaching a coverage of 5.02%. Nevertheless, the contribution of construction land to the total basin NPS load exceeded 10% in 2020. This was the primary factor contributing to the observed increase in pollution loads despite a reduction in agricultural land area over the past two decades. TN and TP loads were markedly higher during the flood season than the non-flood season, accounting for over 80% of the NPS load. The sub-watersheds in the southwest and northeast have been identified as significant sources of nitrogen and phosphorus loss, contributing to the overall burden of NPS pollution. Implementing measures such as fertilizer reduction and conversion of farmlands to forests and grasslands can effectively mitigate NPS pollution, particularly TN pollution. This study proposes that the integration of L-THIA with GIS can serve as a valuable tool for local planners to consider potential pollution risks during future planning and development activities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographical location of Hulan River Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) LULC of year 2010. (<b>b</b>) The distribution of soil types within the basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Simulation process of L-THIA model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Situation of water quality (TN (<b>a</b>) and TP (<b>b</b>)) in HLRB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison between simulated and observed daily stream flow: (<b>a</b>) Station USGS 03498500, the calibration period; (<b>b</b>) Station USGS 03498500, the validation period; (<b>c</b>) Station USGS 03498850, the calibration period; (<b>d</b>) Station USGS 03498850, the validation period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Changes in land use during 2000–2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Inter-annual variation of NP pollution load in the basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Change in spatial distribution of TN (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>)and TP (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>) load in HLRB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Spatial distribution of TN (<b>a</b>) and TP (<b>b</b>) pollution intensity in HLHW.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Reduction rates of TN and TP of chemical fertilizer in different scenarios.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 3672 KiB  
Article
Integrated Application of SWAT and L-THIA Models for Nonpoint Source Pollution Assessment in Data Scarce Regions
by Peiyao Zhang, Shuang (Sophia) Chen, Ying Dai, Baraka Sekadende and Ismael Aaron Kimirei
Water 2024, 16(6), 800; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16060800 - 7 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1352
Abstract
Nonpoint source pollution (NPS) has become the most important reason for the deterioration of water quality, while relevant studies are often limited to African river and lake basins with insufficient data. Taking the Simiyu catchment of the Lake Victoria basin as the study [...] Read more.
Nonpoint source pollution (NPS) has become the most important reason for the deterioration of water quality, while relevant studies are often limited to African river and lake basins with insufficient data. Taking the Simiyu catchment of the Lake Victoria basin as the study area, we set up a NPS model based on the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT). Furthermore, the rationality of this model is verified with the field-measured data. The results manifest that: (1) the temporal variation of NPS load is consistent with the variation pattern of rainfall, the average monthly output of total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) in the rainy season was 1360.6 t and 336.2 t, respectively, while in the dry season was much lower, only 13.5 t and 3.0 t, respectively; (2) in view of spatial distribution among 32 sub-basins, TN load ranged from 2.051 to 24.288 kg/ha with an average load of 12.940 kg/ha, and TP load ranged from 0.263 to 8.103 kg/ha with an average load of 3.321 kg/ha during the 16-month study period; (3) Among the land use types, the cropland contributed the highest proportion of TN and TP pollution with 50.28% and 76.29%, respectively, while the effect of forest on NPS was minimal with 0.05% and 0.02% for TN and TP, respectively. (4) Moreover, the event mean concentration (EMC) values of different land use types have been derived based on the SWAT model, which are key parameters for the application of the long-term hydrological impact assessment (L-THIA) model. Therefore, this study facilitates applying the L-THIA model to other similar data-deficient catchments in view of its relatively lower data requirement. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Water Quality and Contamination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flow chart of this study (the abbreviations of LULC standing for land use and land cover; HRU for hydrologic response unit; CN for runoff curve number; NPS for nonpoint source pollution).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Location of Simiyu Catchment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Distribution of land use (<b>a</b>) and soil types (<b>b</b>) in the Simiyu catchment (land uses: Cropland, Forest, Grassland, Shrubland, Water, Urban land; Soil types: Mollic Solonetz, Vitric Andosols, Eutric Leptosols, Ferralic Cambisols, Rhodic Ferralsols, Eutric Planosols, Eutric Vertisols, Chromic Cambisols, Water bodies).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of the simulated and measured monthly average flow of the Simiyu River.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of the monthly average simulated and measured values of TN and TP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Monthly variations of rainfall (bars) and output (line plots) of TN (<b>a</b>) and TP (<b>b</b>) at the outlet of Simiyu catchment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Monthly variations of TN (<b>a</b>), TP (<b>b</b>) outputs (line plots), and rainfall (bars) predicted for the period from 2023 to 2050 at the outlet of Simiyu catchment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial distribution of TN and TP loads by the SWAT model in the Simiyu catchment from April 2021 to July 2022 (With the numbers denoting the sub-basins).</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 4038 KiB  
Article
Assessing the Long-Term Hydrological Effects of Rapid Urbanization in Metropolitan Shanghai, China: The Finer the Landscape Classification, the More Accurate the Modeling?
by Tao Tao, Du Wang, Ganping Huang, Liqing Lin, Chenhao Wu, Qixin Xu, Jun Zhao and Guangren Qian
Sustainability 2023, 15(8), 6416; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086416 - 10 Apr 2023
Viewed by 1394
Abstract
Rapid urbanization often leads to increase in surface runoff; its modelling is always the focus in the field of land use effect. One of the methodological issues is how to classify the landscape (land use/land cover) in the model. In this study, the [...] Read more.
Rapid urbanization often leads to increase in surface runoff; its modelling is always the focus in the field of land use effect. One of the methodological issues is how to classify the landscape (land use/land cover) in the model. In this study, the long-term hydrological impact assessment (L-THIA) model was used to simulate the change of annual surface runoff during the rapid urbanization in Shanghai since 1965. Two landscape scenarios, based upon land uses and pervious/impervious surfaces, were compared, and the CN values were adjusted to validate the applicability of the two landscape scenarios. The results showed that there was almost no difference between the results based on the two landscape scenarios, and it was suggested that the simplified landscape scenario based upon pervious/impervious surfaces can be workable and efficient, while the land use scenario may not be necessary for the modelling considering its scale of interpretation of remote sensing data. It was found that there was a clear linear relationship between the percentage of impervious surfaces and surface runoff. For every 1% increase in impervious surface, runoff increased by 0.94%. In addition, the effect of precipitation on the modelling was also discussed, which indicated that with the increase in impervious surface percentage, the response of runoff change in both dry year and dry season was more sensitive. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Sub-catchments, soil distribution and hydrological soil group in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Land use type map and CN map of typical years.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Average runoff and annual runoff under four different land use conditions (different urbanization level) of impervious surface pattern and land use pattern from 1961 to 2012.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Correlation of annual simulated runoff under different conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The relationship between runoff and impervious surface (<b>A</b>): Correlation between average runoff and impervious surface in Shanghai; (<b>B</b>): Correlation between impervious surface percentage and average runoff in sub-catchments; (<b>C</b>): Partial enlarged detail of (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Relationship between runoff growth rate and impervious surface under different rainfall.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 2332 KiB  
Review
Calculating the Environmental Impacts of Low-Impact Development Using Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment: A Review of Model Applications
by Zhenhang Cai, Rui Zhu, Emma Ruggiero, Galen Newman and Jennifer A. Horney
Land 2023, 12(3), 612; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030612 - 4 Mar 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2942
Abstract
Low-impact development (LID) is a planning and design strategy that addresses water quality and quantity while providing co-benefits in the urban and suburban landscape. The Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment (L-THIA) model estimates runoff and pollutant loadings using simple inputs of land use, soil [...] Read more.
Low-impact development (LID) is a planning and design strategy that addresses water quality and quantity while providing co-benefits in the urban and suburban landscape. The Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment (L-THIA) model estimates runoff and pollutant loadings using simple inputs of land use, soil type, and climatic data for the watershed-scale analysis of average annual runoff based on curve number analysis. Using Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, we screened 303 articles that included the search term “L-THIA”, identifying 47 where L-THIA was used as the primary research method. After review, articles were categorized on the basis of the primary purpose of the use of L-THIA, including site screening, future scenarios and long-term impacts, site planning and design, economic impacts, model verification and calibration, and broader applications including policy development or flood mitigation. A growing body of research documents the use of L-THIA models across landscapes in applications such as the simulations of pollutant loadings for land use change scenarios and the evaluation of designs and cost-effectiveness. While the existing literature demonstrates that L-THIA models are a useful tool, future directions should include more innovative applications such as intentional community engagement and a focus on equity, climate change impacts, and the return on investment and performance of LID practices to address gaps in knowledge. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>L-THIA and L-THIA-LID models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Process for reviewing published applications of the L-THIA and L-THIA-LID models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Descriptive results of 47 selected articles.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 4016 KiB  
Article
Development and Application of a QGIS-Based Model to Estimate Monthly Streamflow
by Hanyong Lee, Min Suh Chae, Jong-Yoon Park, Kyoung Jae Lim and Youn Shik Park
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11(1), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11010040 - 8 Jan 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3746
Abstract
Changes in rainfall pattern and land use have caused considerable impacts on the hydrological behavior of watersheds; a Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Analysis (L-THIA) model has been used to simulate such variations. The L-THIA model defines curve number according to the land use and [...] Read more.
Changes in rainfall pattern and land use have caused considerable impacts on the hydrological behavior of watersheds; a Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Analysis (L-THIA) model has been used to simulate such variations. The L-THIA model defines curve number according to the land use and hydrological soil group before calculating the direct runoff based on the amount of rainfall, making it a convenient method of analysis. Recently, a method was proposed to estimate baseflow using this model, which may be used to estimate the overall streamflow. Given that this model considers the spatial distribution of land use and hydrological soil groups and must use rainfall data at multiple positions, it requires the usage of a geographical information system (GIS). Therefore, a model that estimates streamflow using land use maps, hydrologic soil group maps, and rain gauge station maps in QGIS, a popular GIS software, was developed. This model was tested in 15 watersheds. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic depicting the L-THIA 2022 model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Interfaces of the L-THIA 2022 model: (<b>a</b>) an interface to build a CN map, (<b>b</b>) an interface to compute daily direct runoff, (<b>c</b>) an interface to update CNs, and (<b>d</b>) an interface to compute monthly baseflow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>Interfaces of the L-THIA 2022 model: (<b>a</b>) an interface to build a CN map, (<b>b</b>) an interface to compute daily direct runoff, (<b>c</b>) an interface to update CNs, and (<b>d</b>) an interface to compute monthly baseflow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Locations of studied watersheds and rain gauge stations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Scatter plots of measured and estimated monthly streamflows during calibration: (<b>a</b>) Wsd-01; (<b>b</b>) Wsd-02; (<b>c</b>) Wsd-03; (<b>d</b>) Wsd-04; (<b>e</b>) Wsd-05; (<b>f</b>) Wsd-06; (<b>g</b>) Wsd-07; (<b>h</b>) Wsd-08; (<b>i</b>) Wsd-09; (<b>j</b>) Wsd-10; (<b>k</b>) Wsd-11; (<b>l</b>) Wsd-12; (<b>m</b>) Wsd-13; (<b>n</b>) Wsd-14; and (<b>o</b>) Wsd-15.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Scatter plots of measured and estimated monthly streamflows during calibration: (<b>a</b>) Wsd-01; (<b>b</b>) Wsd-02; (<b>c</b>) Wsd-03; (<b>d</b>) Wsd-04; (<b>e</b>) Wsd-05; (<b>f</b>) Wsd-06; (<b>g</b>) Wsd-07; (<b>h</b>) Wsd-08; (<b>i</b>) Wsd-09; (<b>j</b>) Wsd-10; (<b>k</b>) Wsd-11; (<b>l</b>) Wsd-12; (<b>m</b>) Wsd-13; (<b>n</b>) Wsd-14; and (<b>o</b>) Wsd-15.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Scatter plots of measured and estimated monthly streamflows during calibration: (<b>a</b>) Wsd-01; (<b>b</b>) Wsd-02; (<b>c</b>) Wsd-03; (<b>d</b>) Wsd-04; (<b>e</b>) Wsd-05; (<b>f</b>) Wsd-06; (<b>g</b>) Wsd-07; (<b>h</b>) Wsd-08; (<b>i</b>) Wsd-09; (<b>j</b>) Wsd-10; (<b>k</b>) Wsd-11; (<b>l</b>) Wsd-12; (<b>m</b>) Wsd-13; (<b>n</b>) Wsd-14; and (<b>o</b>) Wsd-15.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Scatter plots of measured and estimated monthly streamflows during validation: (<b>a</b>) Wsd-01; (<b>b</b>) Wsd-02; (<b>c</b>) Wsd-03; (<b>d</b>) Wsd-04; (<b>e</b>) Wsd-05; (<b>f</b>) Wsd-06; (<b>g</b>) Wsd-07; (<b>h</b>) Wsd-08; (<b>i</b>) Wsd-09; (<b>j</b>) Wsd-10; (<b>k</b>) Wsd-11; (<b>l</b>) Wsd-12; (<b>m</b>) Wsd-13; (<b>n</b>) Wsd-14; and (<b>o</b>) Wsd-15.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Scatter plots of measured and estimated monthly streamflows during validation: (<b>a</b>) Wsd-01; (<b>b</b>) Wsd-02; (<b>c</b>) Wsd-03; (<b>d</b>) Wsd-04; (<b>e</b>) Wsd-05; (<b>f</b>) Wsd-06; (<b>g</b>) Wsd-07; (<b>h</b>) Wsd-08; (<b>i</b>) Wsd-09; (<b>j</b>) Wsd-10; (<b>k</b>) Wsd-11; (<b>l</b>) Wsd-12; (<b>m</b>) Wsd-13; (<b>n</b>) Wsd-14; and (<b>o</b>) Wsd-15.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Scatter plots of measured and estimated monthly streamflows during validation: (<b>a</b>) Wsd-01; (<b>b</b>) Wsd-02; (<b>c</b>) Wsd-03; (<b>d</b>) Wsd-04; (<b>e</b>) Wsd-05; (<b>f</b>) Wsd-06; (<b>g</b>) Wsd-07; (<b>h</b>) Wsd-08; (<b>i</b>) Wsd-09; (<b>j</b>) Wsd-10; (<b>k</b>) Wsd-11; (<b>l</b>) Wsd-12; (<b>m</b>) Wsd-13; (<b>n</b>) Wsd-14; and (<b>o</b>) Wsd-15.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Scatter plots of measured and estimated monthly streamflows during validation: (<b>a</b>) Wsd-01; (<b>b</b>) Wsd-02; (<b>c</b>) Wsd-03; (<b>d</b>) Wsd-04; (<b>e</b>) Wsd-05; (<b>f</b>) Wsd-06; (<b>g</b>) Wsd-07; (<b>h</b>) Wsd-08; (<b>i</b>) Wsd-09; (<b>j</b>) Wsd-10; (<b>k</b>) Wsd-11; (<b>l</b>) Wsd-12; (<b>m</b>) Wsd-13; (<b>n</b>) Wsd-14; and (<b>o</b>) Wsd-15.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 14015 KiB  
Technical Note
A Study to Suggest Monthly Baseflow Estimation Approach for the Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Analysis Models: A Case Study in South Korea
by Hanyong Lee, Hyun-Seok Choi, Min-Suh Chae and Youn-Shik Park
Water 2021, 13(15), 2043; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13152043 - 27 Jul 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2393
Abstract
Changes in both land use and rainfall patterns can lead to changes in the hydrologic behavior of the watershed. The long-term hydrologic impact analysis (L-THIA) model has been used to predict such changes and analyze the changes in mitigation scenarios. The model is [...] Read more.
Changes in both land use and rainfall patterns can lead to changes in the hydrologic behavior of the watershed. The long-term hydrologic impact analysis (L-THIA) model has been used to predict such changes and analyze the changes in mitigation scenarios. The model is simple as only a small amount of input data are required, but it can predict only the direct runoff and cannot determine the streamflow. This study, therefore, aimed to propose a method for predicting the monthly baseflow while maintaining the simplicity of the model. The monthly baseflows for 20 watersheds in South Korea were estimated under different land use conditions. Calibration of the monthly baseflow prediction method produced values for R2 and the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) within the ranges of 0.600–0.817 and 0.504–0.677, respectively; during validation, these values were in the ranges of 0.618–0.786 and 0.567–0.727, respectively. This indicates that the proposed method can reliably predict the monthly baseflow while maintaining the simplicity of the L-THIA model. The proposed model is expected to be applicable to all the various forms of the model. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of study watershed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic flow of the study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Scatter plot of separated monthly baseflow and estimated monthly baseflow: (<b>a</b>) Wsd-01; (<b>b</b>) Wsd-02; (<b>c</b>) Wsd-04; (<b>d</b>) Wsd-06; (<b>e</b>) Wsd-08; (<b>f</b>) Wsd-10; (<b>g</b>) Wsd-12; (<b>h</b>) Wsd-14; (<b>i</b>) Wsd-16; (<b>j</b>) Wsd-18; (<b>k</b>) Wsd-20.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Scatter plot of separated monthly baseflow and estimated monthly baseflow: (<b>a</b>) Wsd-01; (<b>b</b>) Wsd-02; (<b>c</b>) Wsd-04; (<b>d</b>) Wsd-06; (<b>e</b>) Wsd-08; (<b>f</b>) Wsd-10; (<b>g</b>) Wsd-12; (<b>h</b>) Wsd-14; (<b>i</b>) Wsd-16; (<b>j</b>) Wsd-18; (<b>k</b>) Wsd-20.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Scatter plot of separated monthly baseflow and estimated monthly baseflow: (<b>a</b>) Wsd-01; (<b>b</b>) Wsd-02; (<b>c</b>) Wsd-04; (<b>d</b>) Wsd-06; (<b>e</b>) Wsd-08; (<b>f</b>) Wsd-10; (<b>g</b>) Wsd-12; (<b>h</b>) Wsd-14; (<b>i</b>) Wsd-16; (<b>j</b>) Wsd-18; (<b>k</b>) Wsd-20.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flow duration curves of separated monthly baseflow and estimated monthly baseflow in calibration: (<b>a</b>) Wsd-01; (<b>b</b>) Wsd-02; (<b>c</b>) Wsd-04; (<b>d</b>) Wsd-06; (<b>e</b>) Wsd-08; (<b>f</b>) Wsd-10; (<b>g</b>) Wsd-12; (<b>h</b>) Wsd-14; (<b>i</b>) Wsd-16; (<b>j</b>) Wsd-18; (<b>k</b>) Wsd-20.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Flow duration curves of separated monthly baseflow and estimated monthly baseflow in calibration: (<b>a</b>) Wsd-01; (<b>b</b>) Wsd-02; (<b>c</b>) Wsd-04; (<b>d</b>) Wsd-06; (<b>e</b>) Wsd-08; (<b>f</b>) Wsd-10; (<b>g</b>) Wsd-12; (<b>h</b>) Wsd-14; (<b>i</b>) Wsd-16; (<b>j</b>) Wsd-18; (<b>k</b>) Wsd-20.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Scatter plot of separated monthly baseflow and estimated monthly baseflow: (<b>a</b>) Wsd-03; (<b>b</b>) Wsd-05; (<b>c</b>) Wsd-07; (<b>d</b>) Wsd-09; (<b>e</b>) Wsd-11; (<b>f</b>) Wsd-13; (<b>g</b>) Wsd-15; (<b>h</b>) Wsd-17; (<b>i</b>) Wsd-19.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Scatter plot of separated monthly baseflow and estimated monthly baseflow: (<b>a</b>) Wsd-03; (<b>b</b>) Wsd-05; (<b>c</b>) Wsd-07; (<b>d</b>) Wsd-09; (<b>e</b>) Wsd-11; (<b>f</b>) Wsd-13; (<b>g</b>) Wsd-15; (<b>h</b>) Wsd-17; (<b>i</b>) Wsd-19.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Scatter plot of separated monthly baseflow and estimated monthly baseflow: (<b>a</b>) Wsd-03; (<b>b</b>) Wsd-05; (<b>c</b>) Wsd-07; (<b>d</b>) Wsd-09; (<b>e</b>) Wsd-11; (<b>f</b>) Wsd-13; (<b>g</b>) Wsd-15; (<b>h</b>) Wsd-17; (<b>i</b>) Wsd-19.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Flow duration curves of separated monthly baseflow and estimated monthly baseflow in validation: (<b>a</b>) Wsd-03; (<b>b</b>) Wsd-05; (<b>c</b>) Wsd-07; (<b>d</b>) Wsd-09; (<b>e</b>) Wsd-11; (<b>f</b>) Wsd-13; (<b>g</b>) Wsd-15; (<b>h</b>) Wsd-17; (<b>i</b>) Wsd-19.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Flow duration curves of separated monthly baseflow and estimated monthly baseflow in validation: (<b>a</b>) Wsd-03; (<b>b</b>) Wsd-05; (<b>c</b>) Wsd-07; (<b>d</b>) Wsd-09; (<b>e</b>) Wsd-11; (<b>f</b>) Wsd-13; (<b>g</b>) Wsd-15; (<b>h</b>) Wsd-17; (<b>i</b>) Wsd-19.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 3664 KiB  
Article
Assessing the Effectiveness and Cost Efficiency of Green Infrastructure Practices on Surface Runoff Reduction at an Urban Watershed in China
by Fazhi Li, Jingqiu Chen, Bernard A. Engel, Yaoze Liu, Shizhong Wang and Hua Sun
Water 2021, 13(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010024 - 25 Dec 2020
Cited by 28 | Viewed by 4638
Abstract
Studies on the assessment of green infrastructure (GI) practice implementation effect and cost efficiency on an urban watershed scale helps the GI practice selection and investment decisions for sponge city construction in China. However, few studies have been conducted for these topics at [...] Read more.
Studies on the assessment of green infrastructure (GI) practice implementation effect and cost efficiency on an urban watershed scale helps the GI practice selection and investment decisions for sponge city construction in China. However, few studies have been conducted for these topics at present. In this study, the Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment—Low Impact Development (L-THIA-LID) 2.1 model was applied to assess the effectiveness and cost efficiency of GI practices on surface runoff volume reduction in an urban watershed—the Hexi watershed, Nanjing City, China. Grassed swales, bioretentions, green roofs, rain cisterns, permeable pavements, wet ponds, dry ponds, and wetlands were chosen as potential GI practices for sponge city construction based on feasibility analysis. Results showed that grassed swales were the most cost-effective practice (0.7 CNY/m3/yr), but the total implementation effect of grassed swales was not obvious due to the small area of suitable locations. Permeable pavements performed best on runoff reduction, but the cost efficiency was much lower. Correspondingly, bioretentions were compromise practices. Green roofs were the least cost-effective practices, with the cost efficiency at 122.3 CNY/m3/yr, but it was much lower for rain cisterns, which were 3.2 CNY/m3/yr. Wet ponds, dry ponds, and wetlands were potential practices implemented in development areas, of which dry ponds were the most cost-effective (2.7 CNY/m3/yr), followed by wet ponds (10.9 CNY/m3/yr). The annual runoff volume of the total area could be reduced by up to 47.01% by implementing GI practices in buildup areas. Rain cisterns (RC) and permeable pavements (PP) were the best combination for this area, and bioretentions (BR) and green roofs (GR) followed. Grassed swales (GS1), dry ponds (DP), wet ponds (WP), and wetlands (WL) were not wise choices due to the small suitable location areas. This study also demonstrated the feasibility of the L-THIA-LID 2.1 model for the evaluation of GI practice implementation effects and cost efficiency on urban runoff in sponge city construction in China. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Urban Water Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the Hexi watershed in Nanjing, China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Assessment process of runoff control capacity of green infrastructure (GI) practices in a single hydrologic response unit (HRU).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Suitable locations of GI practices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Relationship between total cost and runoff volume reduction with GI practices implemented independently. (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) were a partial magnification of (<b>a</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Relationship between total cost and runoff volume reduction with green roofs (GR) and rain cisterns (RC) implemented in series. (<b>b–d</b>) were partial magnifications of (<b>a</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Relationship between total cost and runoff volume reduction with green roofs (GR) and rain cisterns (RC) implemented in series. (<b>b–d</b>) were partial magnifications of (<b>a</b>).</p>
Full article ">
33 pages, 788 KiB  
Review
Review of Watershed-Scale Water Quality and Nonpoint Source Pollution Models
by Lifeng Yuan, Tadesse Sinshaw and Kenneth J. Forshay
Geosciences 2020, 10(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10010025 - 11 Jan 2020
Cited by 97 | Viewed by 12169
Abstract
Watershed-scale nonpoint source (NPS) pollution models have become important tools to understand, evaluate, and predict the negative impacts of NPS pollution on water quality. Today, there are many NPS models available for users. However, different types of models possess different form and structure [...] Read more.
Watershed-scale nonpoint source (NPS) pollution models have become important tools to understand, evaluate, and predict the negative impacts of NPS pollution on water quality. Today, there are many NPS models available for users. However, different types of models possess different form and structure as well as complexity of computation. It is difficult for users to select an appropriate model for a specific application without a clear understanding of the limitations or strengths for each model or tool. This review evaluates 14 more commonly used watershed-scale NPS pollution models to explain how and when the application of these different models are appropriate for a given effort. The models that are assessed have a wide range of capacities that include simple models used as rapid screening tools (e.g., Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment (L-THIA) and Nonpoint Source Pollution and Erosion Comparison Tool (N-SPECT/OpenNSPECT)), medium-complexity models that require detail data input and limited calibration (e.g., Generalized Watershed Loading Function (GWLF), Loading Simulation Program C (LSPC), Source Loading and Management Model (SLAMM), and Watershed Analysis Risk Management Frame (WARMF)), complex models that provide sophisticated simulation for NPS pollution processes with intensive data and rigorous calibration (e.g., Agricultural Nonpoint Source pollution model (AGNPS/AnnAGNPS), Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), Stormwater Management Model (SWMM), and Hydrologic Simulation Program Fortran (HSPF)), and modeling systems that integrate various sub-models and tools, and contain the highest complexity to solve all phases of hydrologic, hydraulic, and chemical dynamic processes (e.g., Automated Geospatial Watershed Assessment Tool (AGWA), Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Nonpoint Sources (BASINS) and Watershed Modeling System (WMS)). This assessment includes model intended use, components or capabilities, suitable land-use type, input parameter type, spatial and temporal scale, simulated pollutants, strengths and limitations, and software availability. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each watershed-scale NPS model will lead to better model selection for suitability and help to avoid misinterpretation or misapplication in practice. The article further explains the crucial criteria for model selection, including spatial and temporal considerations, calibration and validation, uncertainty analysis, and future research direction of NPS pollution models. The goal of this work is to provide accurate and concise insight for watershed managers and planners to select the best-suited model to reduce the harm of NPS pollution to watershed ecosystems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Hydrogeology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Classification of water quality and NPS pollution models.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 4707 KiB  
Article
Assessment of the Impacts of Land Use/Cover Change and Rainfall Change on Surface Runoff in China
by Fazhi Li, Jingqiu Chen, Yaoze Liu, Peng Xu, Hua Sun, Bernard A. Engel and Shizhong Wang
Sustainability 2019, 11(13), 3535; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133535 - 27 Jun 2019
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4225
Abstract
Assessment of the impacts of land use/cover change (LUCC) and rainfall change on surface runoff depth can help provide an understanding of the temporal trend of variation of surface runoff and assist in urban construction planning. This study evaluated the impacts of LUCC [...] Read more.
Assessment of the impacts of land use/cover change (LUCC) and rainfall change on surface runoff depth can help provide an understanding of the temporal trend of variation of surface runoff and assist in urban construction planning. This study evaluated the impacts of LUCC and rainfall change on surface runoff depth by adopting the well-known Soil Conservation Service-Curve Number (SCS-CN) method and the widely used Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment (L-THIA) model. National hydrologic soil group map of China was generated based on a conversion from soil texture classification system. The CN values were adjusted based on the land use/cover types and soil properties in China. The L-THIA model was configured by using the adjusted CN values and then applied nationally in China. Results show that nationwide rainfall changes and LUCC from 2005 to 2010 had little impact on the distribution of surface runoff, and the high values of runoff depth were mainly located in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Nationally, the average annual runoff depths in 2005, 2010 and 2015 were 78 mm, 83 mm and 90 mm, respectively. For the 2015 land use data, rainfall change caused the variation of surface runoff depth ranging from −203 mm to 476 mm in different regions. LUCC from 2005 to 2015 did not cause obvious change of surface runoff depth, but expansion of developed land led to runoff depth increases ranging from 0 mm to 570 mm and 0 mm to 742 mm from 2005 to 2010 and 2010 to 2015, respectively. Potential solutions to urban land use change and surface runoff control were also analyzed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modelling Land Use Change and Environmental Impact)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Average annual rainfall depths from 2003 to 2017 (<b>left</b>) and percentage developed in each city in 2015 (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Soil texture triangular diagram of United States Department of Agriculture [<a href="#B42-sustainability-11-03535" class="html-bibr">42</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Hydrologic soil group map of China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Framework of Long-Term Hydrology Impact Assessment (L-THIA) model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Location of the selected watersheds for model calibration and validation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Adjustment parameters of CN values in each city.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>S1: Change of annual runoff depth in each city with LUCC and rainfall change 2005–2010, 2010–2015 and 2005–2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>S1: (<b>a</b>) Annual runoff depth statistics in 2005, 2010 and 2015; S1: (<b>b</b>) annual runoff depth change value statistics 2005–10 and 2010–15.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>S2: Annual surface runoff depth change with rainfall change from 2005 to 2010 and 2010 to 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>S2: (<b>a</b>) Annual runoff depth change values from 2005 to 2010 and 2010 to 2015 with rainfall change; S2−S1: (<b>b</b>) Difference of the results after and before taking land use as the variable.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>S3: Annual surface runoff depth change with developed land expansion from 2005 to 2010 and 2010 to 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>S3: Annual surface runoff depth change statistics with LUCC from 2005 to 2010 and 2010 to 2015.</p>
Full article ">
2537 KiB  
Article
Development of Field Pollutant Load Estimation Module and Linkage of QUAL2E with Watershed-Scale L-THIA ACN Model
by Jichul Ryu, Won Seok Jang, Jonggun Kim, Younghun Jung, Bernard A. Engel and Kyoung Jae Lim
Water 2016, 8(7), 292; https://doi.org/10.3390/w8070292 - 15 Jul 2016
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 6321
Abstract
The Long Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment (L-THIA) model was previously improved by incorporating direct runoff lag time and baseflow. However, the improved model, called the L-THIA asymptotic curve number (ACN) model cannot simulate pollutant loads from a watershed or instream water quality. In [...] Read more.
The Long Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment (L-THIA) model was previously improved by incorporating direct runoff lag time and baseflow. However, the improved model, called the L-THIA asymptotic curve number (ACN) model cannot simulate pollutant loads from a watershed or instream water quality. In this study, a module for calculating pollutant loads from fields and through stream networks was developed, and the L-THIA ACN model was combined with the QUAL2E model (The enhanced stream water quality model) to predict instream water quality at a watershed scale. The new model (L-THIA ACN-WQ) was applied to two watersheds within the Korean total maximum daily loads management system. To evaluate the model, simulated results of total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) were compared with observed water quality data collected at eight-day intervals. Between simulated and observed data for TN pollutant loads in Dalcheon A watershed, the R2 and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) were 0.81 and 0.79, respectively, and those for TP were 0.79 and 0.78, respectively. In the Pyungchang A watershed, the R2 and NSE were 0.66 and 0.64, respectively, for TN and both statistics were 0.66 for TP, indicating that model performed satisfactorily for both watersheds. Thus, the L-THIA ACN-WQ model can accurately simulate streamflow, instream pollutant loads, and water quality. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flow diagram for development of watershed-scale L-THIA ACN-WQ (Long Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Asymptotic Curve Number-Water Quality) model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>General structure of QUAL2E [<a href="#B35-water-08-00292" class="html-bibr">35</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Two study watersheds used for evaluation of watershed-scale L-THIA ACN-WQ model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison between simulated streamflow (<b>a</b>) and observed streamflow (<b>b</b>) at Dalcheon A watershed (2011–2014).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison between simulated streamflow (<b>a</b>) and observed streamflow (<b>b</b>) at Pyungchang A watershed (2011–2014).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison between simulated TN (<b>a</b>) and observed TN (<b>b</b>) at Dalcheon A watershed (2011–2014).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison between simulated TN (<b>a</b>) and observed TN (<b>b</b>) at Pyungchang A watershed (2011–2014).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Comparison between simulated TN (<b>a</b>) and observed TN (<b>b</b>) at Pyungchang A watershed (2011–2014).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison between simulated and observed TP at Dalcheon A watershed (2011–2014).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison between simulated and observed TP at Pyungchang A watershed (2011–2014).</p>
Full article ">
1978 KiB  
Article
Development of a Watershed-Scale Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model with the Asymptotic Curve Number Regression Equation
by Jichul Ryu, Won Seok Jang, Jonggun Kim, Joong Dae Choi, Bernard A. Engel, Jae E. Yang and Kyoung Jae Lim
Water 2016, 8(4), 153; https://doi.org/10.3390/w8040153 - 16 Apr 2016
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 7517 | Correction
Abstract
In this study, 52 asymptotic Curve Number (CN) regression equations were developed for combinations of representative land covers and hydrologic soil groups. In addition, to overcome the limitations of the original Long-term Hydrologic Impact Assessment (L-THIA) model when it is applied to larger [...] Read more.
In this study, 52 asymptotic Curve Number (CN) regression equations were developed for combinations of representative land covers and hydrologic soil groups. In addition, to overcome the limitations of the original Long-term Hydrologic Impact Assessment (L-THIA) model when it is applied to larger watersheds, a watershed-scale L-THIA Asymptotic CN (ACN) regression equation model (watershed-scale L-THIA ACN model) was developed by integrating the asymptotic CN regressions and various modules for direct runoff/baseflow/channel routing. The watershed-scale L-THIA ACN model was applied to four watersheds in South Korea to evaluate the accuracy of its streamflow prediction. The coefficient of determination (R2) and Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) values for observed versus simulated streamflows over intervals of eight days were greater than 0.6 for all four of the watersheds. The watershed-scale L-THIA ACN model, including the asymptotic CN regression equation method, can simulate long-term streamflow sufficiently well with the ten parameters that have been added for the characterization of streamflow. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Asymptotic CN regressions obtained in the study by Hawkins [<a href="#B30-water-08-00153" class="html-bibr">30</a>]. CN(P) is the Curve Number as a function of rainfall, and <span class="html-italic">CN<sub>0</sub></span> = 100/(1 + <span class="html-italic">P</span>/2) defines a threshold below which no runoff occurs until the rainfall P in mm exceeds an initial abstraction of 20% of the maximum potential retention.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flow diagram for the development of watershed-scale L-THIA ACN model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Storage in a river reach <span class="html-italic">versus</span> reach outflow [<a href="#B54-water-08-00153" class="html-bibr">54</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Four study watersheds for evaluation of watershed-scale L-THIA ACN model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Results of estimation of streamflow (2008–2014, eight-day interval).</p>
Full article ">
1445 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Performance between Genetic Algorithm and SCE-UA for Calibration of SCS-CN Surface Runoff Simulation
by Ji-Hong Jeon, Chan-Gi Park and Bernard A. Engel
Water 2014, 6(11), 3433-3456; https://doi.org/10.3390/w6113433 - 12 Nov 2014
Cited by 36 | Viewed by 9014
Abstract
Global optimization methods linked with simulation models are widely used for automated calibration and serve as useful tools for searching for cost-effective alternatives for environmental management. A genetic algorithm (GA) and shuffled complex evolution (SCE-UA) algorithm were linked with the Long-Term Hydrologic Impact [...] Read more.
Global optimization methods linked with simulation models are widely used for automated calibration and serve as useful tools for searching for cost-effective alternatives for environmental management. A genetic algorithm (GA) and shuffled complex evolution (SCE-UA) algorithm were linked with the Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment (L-THIA) model, which employs the curve number (SCS-CN) method. The performance of the two optimization methods was compared by automatically calibrating L-THIA for monthly runoff from 10 watersheds in Indiana. The selected watershed areas ranged from 32.7 to 5844.1 km2. The SCS-CN values and total five-day rainfall for adjustment were optimized, and the objective function used was the Nash-Sutcliffe value (NS value). The GA method rapidly reached the optimal space until the 10th generating population (generation), and after the 10th generation solutions increased dispersion around the optimal space, called a cross hair pattern, because of mutation rate increase. The number of looping executions influenced the performance of model calibration for the SCE-UA and GA method. The GA method performed better for the case of fewer loop executions than the SCE-UA method. For most watersheds, calibration performance using GA was better than for SCE-UA until the 50th generation when the number of model loop executions was around 5150 (one generation has 100 individuals). However, after the 50th generation of the GA method, the SCE-UA method performed better for calibrating monthly runoff compared to the GA method. Optimized SCS-CN values for primary land use types were nearly the same for the two methods, but those for minor land use types and total five-day rainfall for AMC adjustment were somewhat different because those parameters did not significantly influence calculation of the objective function. The GA method is recommended for cases when model simulation takes a long time and the model user does not have sufficient time for an optimization program to search for the best values of calibration parameters. For other cases, the SCE-UA program is recommended for automatic model calibration. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flow chart of GA PIKAIA technique.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>One-point crossover method [<a href="#B64-water-06-03433" class="html-bibr">64</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flow chart of SCE-UA algorithm [<a href="#B2-water-06-03433" class="html-bibr">2</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flow chart of CCE subroutine in SCE-UA algorithm [<a href="#B2-water-06-03433" class="html-bibr">2</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Overview of GIS L-THIA application [<a href="#B66-water-06-03433" class="html-bibr">66</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Study watersheds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of generated individuals during evolutionary run between GA and SCE-UA. Number of model runs were 20,000 for SCE-UA and 20,300 (100 individual/generation and 200 generations) for GA. The individual is an optimized parameter of crop land in WD#1 (80% of total area). (<b>a</b>) GA generated individuals; (<b>b</b>) SCE-UA generated individual.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Evolution of the population during the GA evolutionary run and development of the crosshair pattern on part (D). The x and y are individuals for optimized parameters of industrial land use (31% of total area) and high residential area (28% of total area) in WD#10, respectively. (<b>a</b>) Initial population; (<b>b</b>) 5th generation; (<b>c</b>) 10th generation; (<b>d</b>) 15th generation; (<b>e</b>) 100th generation; (<b>f</b>) 200th generation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Histograms for generated individuals by GA and SCE-UA. Number of model runs were 20,000 for SCE-UA and 20,300 (100 individual/generation and 200 generations) for GA. (<b>a</b>) Histogram for GA; (<b>b</b>) Histogram for SCE-UA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>NS values and individuals for two optimized parameters, which are industrial land use (31% of total area) and high residential area (28% of total area) in WD#10, respectively. Number of model runs were 20,000 for SCE-UA and 20,300 (100 individual/generation and 200 generations) for GA. (<b>a</b>) NS values for GA; (<b>b</b>) NS values for SCE-UA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The performance of GA and SCE-UA for model calibration according to the total number of model runs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>1:1 scatter plots of optimized CN and total 5-day rainfall for AMC adjustment. The filled and blank circles represent the calibrated CN values for all land uses and for the dominant land use, respectively, found in each watershed. (<b>a</b>) Optimized CN values; (<b>b</b>) Range of 5-day rainfall for AMC adjustment</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Comparison of box plots of CN values (<b>a</b>) and total 5-day rainfall (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">
622 KiB  
Article
Regional Calibration of SCS-CN L-THIA Model: Application for Ungauged Basins
by Ji-Hong Jeon, Kyoung Jae Lim and Bernard A. Engel
Water 2014, 6(5), 1339-1359; https://doi.org/10.3390/w6051339 - 14 May 2014
Cited by 31 | Viewed by 9033
Abstract
Estimating surface runoff for ungauged watershed is an important issue. The Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) method developed from long-term experimental data is widely used to estimate surface runoff from gaged or ungauged watersheds. Many modelers have used the documented SCS-CN parameters [...] Read more.
Estimating surface runoff for ungauged watershed is an important issue. The Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) method developed from long-term experimental data is widely used to estimate surface runoff from gaged or ungauged watersheds. Many modelers have used the documented SCS-CN parameters without calibration, sometimes resulting in significant errors in estimating surface runoff. Several methods for regionalization of SCS-CN parameters were evaluated. The regionalization methods include: (1) average; (2) land use area weighted average; (3) hydrologic soil group area weighted average; (4) area combined land use and hydrologic soil group weighted average; (5) spatial nearest neighbor; (6) inverse distance weighted average; and (7) global calibration method, and model performance for each method was evaluated with application to 14 watersheds located in Indiana. Eight watersheds were used for calibration and six watersheds for validation. For the validation results, the spatial nearest neighbor method provided the highest average Nash-Sutcliffe (NS) value at 0.58 for six watersheds but it included the lowest NS value and variance of NS values of this method was the highest. The global calibration method provided the second highest average NS value at 0.56 with low variation of NS values. Although the spatial nearest neighbor method provided the highest average NS value, this method was not statistically different than other methods. However, the global calibration method was significantly different than other methods except the spatial nearest neighbor method. Therefore, we conclude that the global calibration method is appropriate to regionalize SCS-CN parameters for ungauged watersheds. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment (L-THIA) GIS application.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Study watersheds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Cumulative monthly flow for validation by regionalizing SCS-CN methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>1:1 Scatter plot of the simulated results by default, global calibrated parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of validated Nash-Sutcliffe (NS) values by the best fit order between methods 6 and 7.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Regionalized SCS-CN value for combination of land use and hydrologic soil group from global calibration method.</p>
Full article ">
3655 KiB  
Article
Development of a Web-Based L-THIA 2012 Direct Runoff and Pollutant Auto-Calibration Module Using a Genetic Algorithm
by Chunhwa Jang, Donghyuk Kum, Younghun Jung, Kyoungsoon Kim, Dong Suk Shin, Bernard A. Engel, Yongchul Shin and Kyoung Jae Lim
Water 2013, 5(4), 1952-1966; https://doi.org/10.3390/w5041952 - 27 Nov 2013
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 7274
Abstract
The Long-Term Hydrology Impact Assessment (L-THIA) model has been used as a screening evaluation tool in assessing not only urbanization, but also land-use changes on hydrology in many countries. However, L-THIA has limitations due to the number of available land-use data that can [...] Read more.
The Long-Term Hydrology Impact Assessment (L-THIA) model has been used as a screening evaluation tool in assessing not only urbanization, but also land-use changes on hydrology in many countries. However, L-THIA has limitations due to the number of available land-use data that can represent a watershed and the land surface complexity causing uncertainties in manually calibrating various input parameters of L-THIA. Thus, we modified the L-THIA model so that could use various (twenty three) land-use categories by considering various hydrologic responses and nonpoint source (NPS) pollutant loads. Then, we developed a web-based auto-calibration module by integrating a Genetic-Algorithm (GA) into the L-THIA 2012 that can automatically calibrate Curve Numbers (CNs) for direct runoff estimations. Based on the optimized CNs and Even Mean Concentrations (EMCs), our approach calibrated surface runoff and nonpoint source (NPS) pollution loads by minimizing the differences between the observed and simulated data. Here, we used default EMCs of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus-TP (as the default values to L-THIA) collected at various local regions in South Korea corresponding to the classifications of different rainfall intensities and land use for improving predicted NPS pollutions. For assessing the model performance, the Yeoju-Gun and Icheon-Si sites in South Korea were selected. The calibrated runoff and NPS (BOD, TN, and TP) pollutions matched the observations with the correlation (R2: 0.908 for runoff and R2: 0.882–0.981 for NPS) and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE: 0.794 for runoff and NSE: 0.882–0.981 for NPS) for the sites. We also compared the NPS pollution differences between the calibrated and averaged (default) EMCs. The calibrated TN and TP (only for Yeoju-Gun) EMCs-based pollution loads identified well with the measured data at the study sites, but the BOD loads with the averaged EMCs were slightly better than those of the calibrated EMCs. The TP loads for the Yeoju-Gun site were usually comparable to the measured data, but the TP loads of the Icheon-Si site had uncertainties. These findings indicate that the web-based auto-calibration module integrated with L-THIA 2012 could calibrate not only the surface runoff and NPS pollutions well, but also provide easy access to users across the world. Thus, our approach could be useful in providing a tool for Best Management Practices (BMPs) for policy/decision-makers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of genetic algorithm (GA).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of direct runoff and pollutant calibration in the Long-Term Hydrology Impact Assessment (L-THIA) 2012 model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Location of study area, Yeoju-Gun and Icheon-Si, South Korea.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Digital elevation model (DEM), land-use, soil map of study area, Yeoju-Gun, SouthKorea.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>DEM, land-use, soil map of study area, Icheon-Si, SouthKorea.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Interface of Web-based L-THIA 2012.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Results of the web-based L-THIA 2012.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop