Search Results (11)

Runoff is greatly influenced by changes in climate conditions. Predicting runoff and analyzing its variations under future climates are crucial for ensuring water security, managing water resources effectively, and promoting sustainable development within the catchment area. As the key step in runoff modeling, the calibration of hydrological model parameters plays an important role in models’ performance. Identifying an efficient and reliable optimization algorithm and objective function continues to be a significant challenge in applying hydrological models. This study selected new algorithms, including the strategic random search (SRS) and sparrow search algorithm (SSA) used in hydrology, gold rush optimizer (GRO) and snow ablation optimizer (SAO) not used in hydrology, and classical algorithms, i.e., shuffling complex evolution (SCE-UA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO), to calibrate the two-parameter monthly water balance model (TWBM), abcd, and HYMOD model under the four objective functions of the Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE) variant based on knowable moments (KMoments) and considering the high and low flows (HiLo) for monthly runoff simulation and future runoff prediction in Tunxi basin, China. Furthermore, the identified algorithm and objective function scenario with the best performance were applied for runoff prediction under climate change projections. The results show that the abcd model has the best performance, followed by the HYMOD and TWBM models, and the rank of model stability is abcd > TWBM > HYMOD with the change of algorithms, objective functions, and contributing calibration years in the history period. The KMoments based on KGE can play a positive role in the model calibration, while the effect of adding the HiLo is unstable. The SRS algorithm exhibits a faster, more stable, and more efficient search than the others in hydrological model calibration. The runoff obtained from the optimal model showed a decrease in the future monthly runoff compared to the reference period under all SSP scenarios. In addition, the distribution of monthly runoff changed, with the monthly maximum runoff changing from June to May. Decreases in the monthly simulated runoff mainly occurred from February to July (10.9–56.1%). These findings may be helpful for the determination of model parameter calibration strategies, thus improving the accuracy and efficiency of hydrological modeling for runoff prediction. Full article

The assessment of seasonal streamflow forecasting is essential for appropriate water resource management. A suitable seasonal forecasting system requires the evaluation of both numerical weather prediction (NWP) and hydrological models to represent the atmospheric and hydrological processes and conditions in a specific region. In this paper, we evaluated the ECMWF-SEAS5 precipitation product with four hydrological models to represent seasonal streamflow forecasts performed at hydropower plants in the Legal Amazon region. The adopted models included GR4J, HYMOD, HBV, and SMAP, which were calibrated on a daily scale for the period from 2014 to 2019 and validated for the period from 2005 to 2013. The seasonal streamflow forecasts were obtained for the period from 2017 to 2019 by considering a daily scale streamflow simulation comprising an ensemble with 51 members of forecasts, starting on the first day of every month up to 7 months ahead. For each forecast, the corresponding monthly streamflow time series was estimated. A post-processing procedure based on the adjustment of an autoregressive model for the residuals was applied to correct the bias of seasonal streamflow forecasts. Hence, for the calibration and validation period, the results show that the HBV model provides better results to represent the hydrological conditions at each hydropower plant, presenting NSE and NSElog values greater than 0.8 and 0.9, respectively, during the calibration stage. However, the SMAP model achieves a better performance with NSE values of up to 0.5 for the raw forecasts. In addition, the bias correction displayed a significant improvement in the forecasts for all hydrological models, specifically for the representation of streamflow during dry periods, significantly reducing the variability of the residuals. Full article

Hydrological modeling is an important tool for water resources management, providing a feasible solution to represent the main hydrological processes and predict future streamflow regimes. The literature presents a set of hydrological models commonly used to represent the rainfall-runoff process in watersheds with different meteorological and geomorphological characteristics. The response of such models could differ significantly for a single precipitation event, given the uncertainties associated with the input data, parameters, and model structure. In this way, a correct hydrological representation of a watershed should include the evaluation of different hydrological models. This study explores the use and performance of five hydrological models to represent daily streamflow regimes at six hydropower plants located in the Tocantins river basin (Brazil). The adopted models include the GR4J, HYMOD, HBV, SMAP, and MGB-IPH. The evaluation of each model was elaborated considering the calibration (2014–2019) and validation period (2005–2010) using observed data of precipitation and climatological variables. Deterministic metrics and statistical tests were used to measure the performance of each model. For the calibration stage, results show that all models achieved a satisfactory performance with NSE values greater than 0.6. For the validation stage, only the MGB-IPH model present a good performance with NSE values greater than 0.7. A bias correction procedure were applied to correct the simulated data of conceptual models. However, the statistical tests exposed that only the MGB-IPH model could preserve the main statistical properties of the observed data. Thus, this study discusses and presents some limitations of the lumped model to represent daily streamflows in large-scale river basins (>50,000 km${}^2$). Full article

A new daily water balance model is developed and tested in this paper. The new model has a similar model structure to the existing probability distributed rainfall runoff models (PDM), such as HyMOD. However, the model utilizes a new distribution function for soil water storage capacity, which leads to the SCS (Soil Conservation Service) curve number (CN) method when the initial soil water storage is set to zero. Therefore, the developed model is a unification of the PDM and CN methods and is called the PDM–CN model in this paper. Besides runoff modeling, the calculation of daily evaporation in the model is also dependent on the distribution function, since the spatial variability of soil water storage affects the catchment-scale evaporation. The generated runoff is partitioned into direct runoff and groundwater recharge, which are then routed through quick and slow storage tanks, respectively. Total discharge is the summation of quick flow from the quick storage tank and base flow from the slow storage tank. The new model with 5 parameters is applied to 92 catchments for simulating daily streamflow and evaporation and compared with AWMB, SACRAMENTO, and SIMHYD models. The performance of the model is slightly better than HyMOD but is not better compared with the 14-parameter model (SACRAMENTO) in the calibration, and does not perform as well in the validation period as the 7-parameter model (SIMHYD) in some areas, based on the NSE values. The linkage between the PDM–CN model and long-term water balance model is also presented, and a two-parameter mean annual water balance equation is derived from the proposed PDM–CN model. Full article

The combination of Hydrological Models and high-resolution Satellite Precipitation Products (SPPs) or regional Climatological Models (RCMs), has provided the means to establish baselines for the quantification, propagation, and reduction in hydrological uncertainty when generating streamflow forecasts. This study aimed to improve operational real-time streamflow forecasts for the Upper Zambezi River Basin (UZRB), in Africa, utilizing the novel Variational Ensemble Forecasting (VEF) approach. In this regard, we describe and discuss the main steps required to implement, calibrate, and validate an operational hydrologic forecasting system (HFS) using VEF and Hydrologic Processing Strategies (HPS). The operational HFS was constructed to monitor daily streamflow and forecast them up to eight days in the future. The forecasting process called short- to medium-range (SR2MR) streamflow forecasting was implemented using real-time rainfall data from three Satellite Precipitation Products or SPPs (The real-time TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis TMPA-RT, the NOAA CPC Morphing Technique CMORPH, and the Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed data using Artificial Neural Networks, PERSIANN) and rainfall forecasts from the Global Forecasting System (GFS). The hydrologic preprocessing (HPR) strategy considered using all raw and bias corrected rainfall estimates to calibrate three distributed hydrological models (HYMOD_DS, HBV_DS, and VIC 4.2.b). The hydrologic processing (HP) strategy considered using all optimal parameter sets estimated during the calibration process to increase the number of ensembles available for operational forecasting. Finally, inference-based approaches were evaluated during the application of a hydrological postprocessing (HPP) strategy. The final evaluation and reduction in uncertainty from multiple sources, i.e., multiple precipitation products, hydrologic models, and optimal parameter sets, was significantly achieved through a fully operational implementation of VEF combined with several HPS. Finally, the main challenges and opportunities associated with operational SR2MR streamflow forecasting using VEF are evaluated and discussed. Full article

Integration of satellite-based data with hydrological modelling was generally conducted via data assimilation or model calibration, and both approaches can enhance streamflow predictions. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of another approach that uses satellite-based soil moisture data to directly estimate the parameter $\beta$ to represent the degree of the spatial distribution of soil moisture storage capacity in the semi-distributed Hymod model. The impact of using historical root-zone soil moisture data from the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission on the prior estimation of the parameter $\beta$ was explored. Two different ways to incorporate the root-zone soil moisture data to estimate the parameter $\beta$ are proposed, i.e., one is to derive a priori distribution of $\beta$ , and the other is to derive a fixed value for $\beta$ . The simulations of the Hymod models employing the two ways to estimate $\beta$ are compared with the results produced by the original model, i.e., the one without employing satellite-based data to estimate the parameter $\beta$ , at three study catchments (the Upper Hanjiang River catchment, the Xiangjiang River catchment, and the Ganjiang River catchment). The results illustrate that the two ways to incorporate the SMAP root-zone soil moisture data in order to predetermine the parameter $\beta$ of the semi-distributed Hymod model both perform well in simulating streamflow during the calibration period, and a slight improvement was found during the validation period. Notably, deriving a fixed $\beta$ value from satellite soil moisture data can provide better performance for ungauged catchments despite reducing the model freedom degrees due to fixing the $\beta$ value. It is concluded that the robustness of the Hymod model in predicting the streamflow can be improved when the spatial information of satellite-based soil moisture data is utilized to estimate the parameter $\beta$ . Full article

Currently, practically no modeling study is expected to be carried out without some form of Sensitivity Analysis (SA). At the same time, there is a large number of various methods and it is not always easy for practitioners to choose one. The aim of this paper is to briefly review main classes of SA methods, and to present the results of the practical comparative analysis of applying them. Six different global SA methods: Sobol, eFAST (extended Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test), Morris, LH-OAT, RSA (Regionalized Sensitivity Analysis), and PAWN are tested on three conceptual rainfall-runoff models with varying complexity: (GR4J, Hymod, and HBV) applied to the case study of Bagmati basin (Nepal). The methods are compared with respect to effectiveness, efficiency, and convergence. A practical framework of selecting and using the SA methods is presented. The result shows that, first of all, all the six SA methods are effective. Morris and LH-OAT methods are the most efficient methods in computing SI and ranking. eFAST performs better than Sobol, and thus it can be seen as its viable alternative for Sobol. PAWN and RSA methods have issues of instability, which we think are due to the ways Cumulative Distribution Functions (CDFs) are built, and using Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistics to compute Sensitivity Indices. All the methods require sufficient number of runs to reach convergence. Difference in efficiency of different methods is an inevitable consequence of the differences in the underlying principles. For SA of hydrological models, it is recommended to apply the presented practical framework assuming the use of several methods, and to explicitly take into account the constraints of effectiveness, efficiency (including convergence), ease of use, and availability of software. Full article

The importance of numerical schemes in hydrological models has been increasingly recognized in the hydrological community. However, the relationship between model performance and the properties of numerical schemes remains unclear. In this study, we employed two types of numerical schemes (i.e., explicit Runge-Kutta schemes with different orders of accuracy and partially implicit Euler schemes with different implicit factors) in the hydrological model (HYMOD) to simulate the flow hydrograph of the Leaf River basin from 1948 to 1988. Results computed by different numerical schemes were compared and the relationships between model performance and two scheme properties (i.e., the order of accuracy and the implicit factor) were discussed. Results showed that the more explicit schemes generally lead to the overestimation of flow hydrographs, whereas the more implicit schemes lead to underestimation. In addition, the numerical error tended to decrease with increasing orders of accuracy. As a result, the optimal parameter sets found by low-order schemes significantly deviated from those found by the analytical solution. The findings of this study can provide useful implications for designing suitable numerical schemes for hydrological models. Full article

Precipitation provides the most crucial input for hydrological modeling. However, rain gauge networks, the most common precipitation measurement mechanisms, are sometimes sparse and inadequately distributed in practice, resulting in an imperfect representation of rainfall spatial variability. The objective of this study is to analyze the sensitivity of different model structures to the different density and distribution of rain gauges and evaluate their reliability and robustness. Based on a rain gauge network of 20 gauges in the Jinjiang River Basin, south-eastern China, this study compared the performance of two conceptual models (the hydrologic model (HYMOD) and Xinanjiang) and one process-based distributed model (the water and energy transfer between soil, plants and atmosphere model (WetSpa)) with different rain gauge distributions. The results show that the average accuracy for the three models is generally stable as the number of rain gauges decreases but is sensitive to changes in the network distribution. HYMOD has the highest calibration uncertainty, followed by Xinanjiang and WetSpa. Differing model responses are consistent with changes in network distribution, while calibration uncertainties are more related to model structures. Full article

This study proposes variable balancing approaches for the exploration (diversification) and exploitation (intensification) of the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) with simulated binary crossover (SBX) and polynomial mutation (PM) in the multiobjective automatic parameter calibration of a lumped hydrological model, the HYMOD model. Two objectives—minimizing the percent bias and minimizing three peak flow differences—are considered in the calibration of the six parameters of the model. The proposed balancing approaches, which migrate the focus between exploration and exploitation over generations by varying the crossover and mutation distribution indices of SBX and PM, respectively, are compared with traditional static balancing approaches (the two dices value is fixed during optimization) in a benchmark hydrological calibration problem for the Leaf River (1950 km²) near Collins, Mississippi. Three performance metrics—solution quality, spacing, and convergence—are used to quantify and compare the quality of the Pareto solutions obtained by the two different balancing approaches. The variable balancing approaches that migrate the focus of exploration and exploitation differently for SBX and PM outperformed other methods. Full article

It is always a dream of hydrologists to model the mystery of complex hydrological processes in a precise way. If parameterized correctly, a simple hydrological model can represent nature very accurately. In this study, a simple and effective optimization algorithm, sequential replacement of weak parameters (SRWP), is introduced for automatic calibration of hydrological models. In the SRWP algorithm, a weak parameter set is sequentially replaced with another deeper and good parameter set. The SRWP algorithm is tested on several theoretical test functions, as well as with a hydrological model. The SRWP algorithm result is compared with the shuffled complex evolution-University of Arizona (SCE-UA) algorithm and the robust parameter estimation (ROPE) algorithm. The result shows that the SRWP algorithm easily overcomes the local minima and converges to the optimal parameter space. The SRWP algorithm does not converge to a single optima; instead, it gives a convex hull of an optimal space. An ensemble of results can be generated from the optimal space for prediction purpose. The ensemble spread will account for the parameter estimation uncertainty. The methodology was demonstrated using the hydrological model (HYMOD) conceptual model on upper Neckar catchments of southwest Germany. The results show that the parameters estimated by this stepwise calibration are robust and comparable to commonly-used optimization algorithms. SRWP can be an alternative to other optimization algorithms for model calibration. Full article