[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (174)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = HEC-HMS

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
38 pages, 6599 KiB  
Article
Identifying Flood Source Areas and Analyzing High-Flow Extremes Under Changing Land Use, Land Cover, and Climate in the Gumara Watershed, Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia
by Haile Belay, Assefa M. Melesse, Getachew Tegegne and Habtamu Tamiru
Climate 2025, 13(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13010007 - 1 Jan 2025
Viewed by 604
Abstract
Changes in land use and land cover (LULC) and climate increasingly influence flood occurrences in the Gumara watershed, located in the Upper Blue Nile (UBN) basin of Ethiopia. This study assesses how these factors impact return period-based peak floods, flood source areas, and [...] Read more.
Changes in land use and land cover (LULC) and climate increasingly influence flood occurrences in the Gumara watershed, located in the Upper Blue Nile (UBN) basin of Ethiopia. This study assesses how these factors impact return period-based peak floods, flood source areas, and future high-flow extremes. Merged rainfall data (1981–2019) and ensemble means of four CMIP5 and four CMIP6 models were used for historical (1981–2005), near-future (2031–2055), and far-future (2056–2080) periods under representative concentration pathways (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) and shared socioeconomic pathways (SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5). Historical LULC data for the years 1985, 2000, 2010, and 2019 and projected LULC data under business-as-usual (BAU) and governance (GOV) scenarios for the years 2035 and 2065 were used along with rainfall data to analyze flood peaks. Flood simulation was performed using a calibrated Hydrologic Engineering Center–Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) model. The unit flood response (UFR) approach ranked eight subwatersheds (W1–W8) by their contribution to peak flood magnitude at the main outlet, while flow duration curves (FDCs) of annual maximum (AM) flow series were used to analyze changes in high-flow extremes. For the observation period, maximum peak flood values of 211.7, 278.5, 359.5, 416.7, and 452.7 m3/s were estimated for 5-, 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100-year return periods, respectively, under the 2019 LULC condition. During this period, subwatersheds W4 and W6 were identified as major flood contributors with high flood index values. These findings highlight the need to prioritize these subwatersheds for targeted interventions to mitigate downstream flooding. In the future period, the highest flow is expected under the SSP5-8.5 (2056–2080) climate scenario combined with the BAU-2065 land use scenario. These findings underscore the importance of strategic land management and climate adaptation measures to reduce future flood risks. The methodology developed in this study, particularly the application of RF-MERGE data in flood studies, offers valuable insights into the existing knowledge base on flood modeling. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location map of the study area. (<b>a</b>) Location map of the Upper Blue Nile (UBN) basin within the 12 river basins of Ethiopia. (<b>b</b>) Location map of the upstream Gumara watershed (bounded by a red rectangle) within the Lake Tana subbasin, and (<b>c</b>) Detailed map showing the rainfall and streamflow gauging stations, stream network, climate model grid (25 km × 25 km), and grid center for the NASA dataset, and elevation map of the upstream (flood source area) part of the Gumara watershed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Elevation, (<b>b</b>) slope, (<b>c</b>) hydrologic soil groups (HSGs), and (<b>d</b>–<b>k</b>) historical and projected land use and land cover maps of the Gumara watershed for the historical (1985, 2000, 2010, and 2019) and future years (2035 and 2065) under the business-as-usual (BAU) and governance (GOV) scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Methodological framework of the study. In the figure, boxes highlighted with grey color represent the main processing algorithm, tool, and hydrological model used in the study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Observed ground-based rainfall and discharge data from 1981 to 2019 for the Gumara watershed. (<b>a</b>) Double mass curve analysis, (<b>b</b>) mean annual rainfall of each ground-based rainfall station, (<b>c</b>) mean monthly rainfall, and (<b>d</b>) mean monthly discharge.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of daily observed rainfall data from RF-MERGE and historical CMIP5 and CMIP6 models for the period 1981–2005.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>A 30 m spatial resolution gridded runoff curve numbers for the historical years (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) and future scenarios (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>). The gray shaded areas that bound in the figure illustrate the gradient orientation of the runoff curve number, with maximum values along the north and south directions and minimum values in the middle of the watershed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Historical (1981–2005) and projected (2031–2080) mean monthly rainfall (mm/month) of the Gumara watershed, estimated from RF-MERGE data and multi-model ensemble means from CMIP5 and CMIP6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial distribution of mean annual rainfall (MARF) in the historical (1981–2005) and two future periods, near-future (2031–2056) and far-future (2056–2080), under different climate scenarios. In the figures, different color gradients show the distribution of rainfall in the study area, where the dark blue color grade shows areas that receive the highest mean annual rainfall.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Temporal variation of the long-term annual maximum (AM) 1-day rainfall series from RF-MERGE estimates (1981–2019) and (<b>b</b>) depth–duration–frequency (DDF) curve developed from RF-MERGE rainfall. In panel (<b>a</b>), the red line illustrates the increasing linear trend of annual maximum 1-day rainfall.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Box plot of historical (1981–2005) and projected (2031–2080) annual maximum (AM) 1-day rainfall, represented in different color. The plot summarizes the minimum, first quartile (Q1), median, third quartile (Q3), and maximum values of the rainfall data. The blue dashed lines indicate the full range of data (minimum and maximum values) across the study periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Percentage coverage of land use and land cover (LULC) classes of the Gumara watershed. (<b>a</b>) Historical years (1985, 2000, 2010, and 2019) and (<b>b</b>) future years (2035 and 2065) under the business-as-usual (BAU) and governance (GOV) scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Delineated subwatershed’s area, centroids, and stream network of the Gumara watershed as delineated in the HEC-HMS model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Model sensitivity analysis for the runoff curve number (CN) from 13 August to 31 August 2010.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Observed and simulated discharge for selected events: (<b>a</b>) Event 1 (calibration), from 1 July to 31 August 1996; (<b>b</b>) Event 2 (calibration), from 5 July to 31 July 2008; (<b>c</b>) Event 3 (validation), from 2 August to 27 August 2014.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>(<b>a</b>) Comparison of simulated peak discharge (Q) under various land use conditions across different return periods and (<b>b</b>) comparison of simulated runoff volume (V) under various land use conditions across different return periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Computed flood index (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>f</mi> <mi>i</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>) values estimated using the Unit Flood Response (UFR) approach for a 50-year return period peak discharge under different LULC conditions: (<b>a</b>) LULC-1985, (<b>b</b>) LULC-2000, (<b>c</b>) LULC-2010, and (<b>d</b>) LULC-2019. The blue color gradient represents flood index levels across subwatersheds, with the darkest blue indicating subwatersheds with the highest runoff potential.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Comparison between historical and future annual maximum 1-day flow duration curves. (<b>a</b>) Future climate combined with the BAU land use scenario and (<b>b</b>) future climate combined with the GOV land use scenario.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 5919 KiB  
Article
Exploring the Impact of Nature-Based Solutions for Hydrological Extremes Mitigation in Small Mixed Urban-Forest Catchment
by Lina Pérez-Corredor, Samuel Edward Hume, Mark Bryan Alivio and Nejc Bezak
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(24), 11813; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142411813 - 18 Dec 2024
Viewed by 518
Abstract
Many regions in Europe face increasing issues with flooding and droughts due to changing rainfall patterns caused by climate change. For example, higher rainfall intensities increase urban flooding. Nature-based solutions (NbS) are suggested as a key mitigation strategy for floods. This study aims [...] Read more.
Many regions in Europe face increasing issues with flooding and droughts due to changing rainfall patterns caused by climate change. For example, higher rainfall intensities increase urban flooding. Nature-based solutions (NbS) are suggested as a key mitigation strategy for floods. This study aims to address and mitigate the challenges faced in Tivoli natural park in Ljubljana regarding high peak discharges and low-flow issues in the creek entering the sewer system. The study involves setting up, calibrating and validating a Hydrologic Engineering Centre–Hydrologic Modelling System (HEC-HMS) model using available data. This study analyses NbS, such as small ponds, green roofs and permeable paving, to reduce peak discharge. Runoff was reduced by an average of 32.4% with all NbS implemented and peak discharge by 20 L/s. Permeable parking performed best, with an average runoff reduction of 6.4%, compared to 4.8% for permeable streets and 5.9% for green roofs. The ponds reduced peak discharge, although their effectiveness varied between rainfall events. Rainfall events with higher volumes and durations tended to overwhelm the proposed solutions, reducing their effectiveness. The ability of HEC-HMS to model NbS is also discussed. The curve number (CN) parameter and impervious % alterations to simulate NbS provided quantitative data on changes in runoff and discharge. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Urban Green Infrastructure and Its Effects)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map showing the location of the study area in Ljubljana (<b>upper right</b>), showing land use, water courses (<b>upper left</b>) and topography (<b>lower left</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Project methodology, including the data used, the pre-processing steps taken and the modelling conducted.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Location of NbS scenarios implemented in the study area. P1 = Existing Pond; P2 = Southeast Pond; P3 = Northwest Pond.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Calibration performance of the model for Events 1 and 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Selected discharge hydrographs for Events 1, 5, 7 and 9, showing all scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Reduction in peak discharge (L/s) for all events and scenarios.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 8883 KiB  
Article
Hydrological Modeling of Stream Drainage Basins: A Case Study on the Magyaregregy Experimental Catchment in Hungary
by Mirjana Horvat, Zoltan Horvat, Fruzsina Majer and Dániel Koch
Water 2024, 16(24), 3629; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16243629 - 17 Dec 2024
Viewed by 366
Abstract
This paper presents the field measurements, observations, and numerical simulations conducted for a case study of the Magyaregregy experimental catchment in Hungary. Field measurements included the determination of surface runoff and infiltration intensity on an experimental plot and hydrograph measurements that assessed the [...] Read more.
This paper presents the field measurements, observations, and numerical simulations conducted for a case study of the Magyaregregy experimental catchment in Hungary. Field measurements included the determination of surface runoff and infiltration intensity on an experimental plot and hydrograph measurements that assessed the ratio between surface and subsurface runoff. Soil moisture measurements both during the infiltration experiments and throughout the experimental catchments gave valuable information regarding this critical parameter. A digital terrain model and the aforementioned field measurements allowed the establishment of a numerical model using HEC-HMS 4.3 for the Magyaregregy experimental catchment process. Although the calibration process was straightforward, considerable difficulties were encountered during the model validation. While the calibration procedure gave appropriate numerical values for most calibrated parameters, it did not provide the proper initial conditions. As a possible solution, the validation period was preceded by a simulation of a relatively long time duration to gain appropriate initial conditions. Finally, the hydrological model’s validation reproduced the measured base flow, as well as the maximum values of discharges. Furthermore, the use of composite-corrected radar data for precipitation values proved to be somewhat unreliable. This supports the principle that data from remote sensing (e.g., radar data) should be used with the utmost care and deliberation as input for hydrological models. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Basic components of the employed hydrological model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Snyder unit hydrograph.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The Magyaregregy experimental catchment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Hydrographic station on the Völgység Stream.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Infiltration curve affected by subsurface insect and root tunnels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Soil moisture and precipitation during the infiltration measurements.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Example of soil moisture and precipitation measured on the experimental catchment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Hydrograph on the Várvöly Stream.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Daily precipitation amounts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Measured potential evapotranspiration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Stream formation using a DTM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Stream segments and sub-catchments of the experimental catchment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Calibration event on the experimental catchment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Model calibration results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Linear regression analysis of the model calibration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Initial verification results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>In-depth analysis of the calibration and verification period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Results for the lengthened verification period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Final verification results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Linear regression analysis of the model verification.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 448 KiB  
Review
An Approach to Assess Land Stability and Erosion on Mined Landforms
by Devika Nair, Sean Bellairs and Kenneth G. Evans
Mining 2024, 4(4), 1093-1106; https://doi.org/10.3390/mining4040060 - 6 Dec 2024
Viewed by 509
Abstract
Where mining activities cause disturbance in catchments, streams are often impacted by heavy loads of fine eroded material. Since geomorphological processes are very slow, it is expected that during rehabilitation, typically hundreds of years are required for a mine landform to return to [...] Read more.
Where mining activities cause disturbance in catchments, streams are often impacted by heavy loads of fine eroded material. Since geomorphological processes are very slow, it is expected that during rehabilitation, typically hundreds of years are required for a mine landform to return to stability. A sensitive approach to analyzing post-mining landform stability in tropical regions is to assess the quantity of fine suspended sediments (FSS = silt + clay (0.45 µm < diameter < 63 µm)) leaving the catchment where the mine resides and entering the receiving streams in response to storm events. Continuous stream discharge and FSS quantities upstream and downstream of the catchment where the mine resides were modeled using the HEC-HMS (Hydrologic Engineering Centre–Hydrologic Modeling System). Once calibrated, the model was run for a thousand years to predict continuous stream discharge and FSS quantities for various predicted rainfall scenarios. Short-term erosion and deposition across the mine catchment were also evaluated using a calibrated landform evolution model, CAESAR-Lisflood. This paper reviews watershed soil erosion measurements and modeling research leading to the abovementioned approach. This approach assesses mine landform erosion and stability in terms of fine suspended sediments. It can be used to determine mine landform erosion dynamics, predict the achievement of landform stability equilibrium, and as a post-mining rehabilitation assessment tool. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Post-Mining Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Representation of the Rate Law [<a href="#B50-mining-04-00060" class="html-bibr">50</a>].</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 10247 KiB  
Article
Effects of Environmental Changes on Flood Patterns in the Jing River Basin: A Case Study from the Loess Plateau, China
by Jiqiang Lyu, Yuhao Yang, Shanshan Yin, Zhizhou Yang, Zhaohui Zhou, Yan Wang, Pingping Luo, Meng Jiao and Aidi Huo
Land 2024, 13(12), 2053; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122053 - 29 Nov 2024
Viewed by 490
Abstract
Human activities and climate change have significantly influenced the water cycle, impacting flood risks and water security. This study centers on the Jing River Basin in the Chinese Loess Plateau, analyzing hydrological patterns and flood progression using the HEC-HMS model under changing conditions. [...] Read more.
Human activities and climate change have significantly influenced the water cycle, impacting flood risks and water security. This study centers on the Jing River Basin in the Chinese Loess Plateau, analyzing hydrological patterns and flood progression using the HEC-HMS model under changing conditions. The findings indicate that climate change substantially affects flood predictions, increasing peak flows and volumes by up to 10.9% and 11.1%, respectively. It is essential to recognize that traditional flood models may underestimate the risks posed by these changes, emphasizing the necessity for updated methods incorporating climatic and human factors. Changes in land use, such as the expansion of grasslands and forests, have reduced peak discharges and flood volumes. Consequently, the combined impacts of climate and land use changes have intensified flood frequencies, necessitating updated strategies to manage risks effectively. The dynamics of flooding are significantly impacted by changes in climate and land use, particularly in minor floods that occur frequently, highlighting the influence of climate change on flooding trends. Within the Jing River Basin, hydrological patterns have been shaped by both climatic variations and human activities, leading to an increase in extreme hydrological events and concerns regarding water security. Using the HEC-HMS model, this study examines the hydrology of the Jing River Basin, focusing on the design of storm events and analyzing various flood characteristics under different scenarios. Climate change has resulted in higher peak discharges and volume surges ranging from 6.3% to 10.9%, while shifts in land use, such as decreases in farmland and the expansion of grasslands, have caused declines ranging from 7.2% to 4.7% in peak flows and volumes. The combined effects of climate variation and land utilization have complex implications for flood patterns, with milder to moderate floods showing a more significant impact and shorter return periods facing increased consequences. These findings underscore the interconnected nature of climate change, land use, and flooding dynamics in the Jing River Basin, highlighting the need for comprehensive strategies to address these challenges and ensure sustainable water management in the region. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the JRB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Land use map of the JRB in 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The technical route of environmental changes and their impact on floods in the JRB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Conditional probability-based hydrological frequency analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Flood season average annual rainfall in the basin, comparing 1971–1994 and 1995–2013.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Flood season annual temperature in the basin, comparing 1971–1994 and 1995–2013.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Watershed land use changes from 1985 to 2013.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Watershed NDVI changes from 1998 to 2013.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Spatial distribution of NDVI mean. (<b>b</b>) Annual mean NDVI variation trend.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Precipitation hydrographs at varied design frequencies across sites in the watershed. (<b>a</b>) Chun hua; (<b>b</b>) Nan fang zhen; (<b>c</b>) Ge tou si; (<b>d</b>) Qing he li.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Flood simulation results utilizing the HEC-HMS model during the calibration phase. (<b>a</b>) Date of event onset is 29 August 1973; (<b>b</b>) Date of event onset is 5 August 1989; (<b>c</b>) Date of event onset is 29 July 1996; (<b>d</b>) Date of event onset is 8 July 2003.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Flood simulation results utilizing the HEC-HMS model during the validation phase. (<b>a</b>) Date of event onset is 25 July 1975; (<b>b</b>) Date of event onset is 5 August 1992; (<b>c</b>) Date of event onset is 27 August 2008; (<b>d</b>) Date of event onset is 19 July 2010.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 5572 KiB  
Article
Application of Machine Learning and Hydrological Models for Drought Evaluation in Ungauged Basins Using Satellite-Derived Precipitation Data
by Anjan Parajuli, Ranjan Parajuli, Mandip Banjara, Amrit Bhusal, Dewasis Dahal and Ajay Kalra
Climate 2024, 12(11), 190; https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12110190 - 17 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1164
Abstract
Drought is a complex environmental hazard to ecosystems and society. Decision-making on drought management options requires evaluating and predicting the extremity of future drought events. In this regard, quantifiable indices such as the standardized precipitation index (SPI), the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI), [...] Read more.
Drought is a complex environmental hazard to ecosystems and society. Decision-making on drought management options requires evaluating and predicting the extremity of future drought events. In this regard, quantifiable indices such as the standardized precipitation index (SPI), the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI), and the standardized streamflow index (SSI) have been commonly used to characterize meteorological and hydrological drought. In general, the estimation and prediction of the indices require an extensive range of precipitation (SPI and SPEI) and discharge (SSI) datasets in space and time domains. However, there is a challenge for long-term and spatially extensive data availability, leading to the insufficiency of data in estimating drought indices. In this regard, this study uses satellite precipitation data to estimate and predict the drought indices. SPI values were calculated from the precipitation data obtained from the Centre for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing (CHRS) data portal for a study water basin. This study employs a hydrological model for calculating discharge and drought in the overall basin. It uses random forest (RF) and support vector regression (SVR) as machine learning models for SSI prediction for time scales of 1- and 3-month periods, which are widely used for establishing interactions between predictors and predictands that are both linear and non-linear. This study aims to evaluate drought severity variation in the overall basin using the hydrological model and compare this result with the machine learning model’s results. The results from the prediction model, hydrological model, and the station data show better correlation. The coefficients of determination obtained for 1-month SSI are 0.842 and 0.696, and those for the 3-month SSI are 0.919 and 0.862 in the RF and SVR models, respectively. These results also revealed more precise predictions of machine learning models in the longer duration as compared to the shorter one, with the better prediction result being from the SVR model. The hydrological model-evaluated SSI has 0.885 and 0.826 coefficients of determination for the 1- and 3-month time durations, respectively. The results and discussion in this research will aid planners and decision-makers in managing hydrological droughts in basins. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coping with Flooding and Drought)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Map of the United States with California state; (<b>b</b>) map of California with every watershed; and (<b>c</b>) map of the watershed with gauge stations and water line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Historical drought conditions in California (D0, D1, D2, D3, and D4 indicates Abnormally Dry, Moderate Drought, Severe Drought, Extreme Drought and Exceptional Drought conditions, respectively) [<a href="#B36-climate-12-00190" class="html-bibr">36</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The correlation matrix: (<b>a</b>) SSI1 (<b>b</b>) SSI3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flowchart of Hydrology analysis and drought index calculation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Modeled flow vs. observed flow from 4 January to 14 January 2018.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Correlation graph showing the scatter plot of modeled Vs observed flow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Regression analysis of the standardized streamflow index for the given months: (<b>a</b>) 1 month and (<b>b</b>) 3 months from the observed flow in the basin to the SSI from the HEC-HMS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Correlation graph of observed and random forest predicted standardized streamflow index: (<b>a</b>) SSI1 (overall data) and (<b>b</b>) SSI3 (overall data).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Correlation graph of observed and random forest predicted standardized streamflow index: (<b>a</b>) SSI1 (overall data) and (<b>b</b>) SSI3 (overall data).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Correlation graph of observed and support vector regression estimated. Standardized streamflow index: (<b>a</b>) SSI1 (overall data) and (<b>b</b>) SSI3 (overall data).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Correlation graph of observed and support vector regression estimated. Standardized streamflow index: (<b>a</b>) SSI1 (overall data) and (<b>b</b>) SSI3 (overall data).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) SSI1 and (<b>b</b>) SSI3.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 2987 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of the Hydrological Response to Land Use Change Scenarios in Urban and Non-Urban Mountain Basins in Ecuador
by Diego Mejía-Veintimilla, Pablo Ochoa-Cueva and Juan Arteaga-Marín
Land 2024, 13(11), 1907; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13111907 - 14 Nov 2024
Viewed by 585
Abstract
Land cover is a crucial factor in controlling rainfall–runoff processes in mountain basins. However, various anthropogenic activities, such as converting natural vegetation to agricultural or urban areas, can affect this cover, thereby increasing the risk of flooding in cities. This study evaluates the [...] Read more.
Land cover is a crucial factor in controlling rainfall–runoff processes in mountain basins. However, various anthropogenic activities, such as converting natural vegetation to agricultural or urban areas, can affect this cover, thereby increasing the risk of flooding in cities. This study evaluates the hydrological behavior of two mountain basins in Loja, Ecuador, under varying land use scenarios. El Carmen small basin (B1), located outside the urban perimeter, and Las Pavas small basin (B2), within the urban area, were modeled using HEC-HMS 4.3 software. The results highlight the significant influence of vegetation degradation and restoration on hydrological processes. In degraded vegetation scenarios, peak flows increase due to reduced soil infiltration capacity, while baseflows decrease. Conversely, the conserved and restored vegetation scenarios show lower peak flows and higher baseflows, which are attributed to enhanced evapotranspiration, interception, and soil water storage. The study underscores the importance of ecosystem management and restoration in mitigating extreme hydrological events and improving water resilience. These findings provide a foundation for decision-making in urban planning and basin management, emphasizing the need for comprehensive and multidisciplinary approaches to develop effective public policies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location map and average monthly distribution of temperature and precipitation of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Selected precipitation events and hydrographs for hydrological modeling of the B1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Current and future hypothetical land cover scenarios. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) El Carmen (B1). (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Las Pavas (B2).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Gauged and simulated flows under the LULC scenarios for basins B1 and B2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Box plot for scenario-specific flow rates.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 9614 KiB  
Article
The Surface Water Potentiality in Arid and Semi-Arid Basins Using GIS and HEC-HMS Modeling, Case Study: Gebel El Sibai Watershed, Red Sea
by Abdelfattah Elsayed Elsheikh, Mahmoud A. El Ammawy, Nessrien M. Hamadallah, Sedky H. A. Hassan, Sang-Eun Oh, Kotb A. Attia and Mahmoud H. Darwish
Water 2024, 16(21), 3111; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16213111 - 30 Oct 2024
Viewed by 713
Abstract
The Red Sea region is considered one of the regions that suffer most from water scarcity among the Egyptian areas. This situation reinforces the importance of maximizing the utilization of available water sources. Rainwater and flood harvesting may form a good water source [...] Read more.
The Red Sea region is considered one of the regions that suffer most from water scarcity among the Egyptian areas. This situation reinforces the importance of maximizing the utilization of available water sources. Rainwater and flood harvesting may form a good water source if good harvesting practices are applied. Natural pastures, Bedouin communities, and wild plants may be affected by severe droughts expected due to climate change. Additional water resources are very important to enhance the resilience of the Bedouin communities to probable droughts. Five main hydrographic basins are issued from Gebel El Sibai (+1435 m), including Wadi Esel, Wadi Sharm El Bahari, Wadi Sharm El Qibli, Wadi Wizr, and Wadi Umm Gheig. Detailed investigation of morphometric parameters, runoff/rainfall relationship, and flood volume using GIS and HEC-HMS model of each basin were estimated as well as natural vegetation. This study reveals that rainfall ranges from 84 mm to 0 mm, and a storm of 84 mm (highest event) is expected to occur every 42 years with a probability of 2.4%. Quantitative morphometric analysis implies that the area has good potential for flooding, especially Wadi Sharm El Qibli and Wadi Umm Gheig, where Wadi Sharm El Bahri represents the lowest priority for flooding. The flood volume of Umm Gheig basin is the greatest: 12 million m3 at the basin outlet with a rainfall event of 15 mm. Wadi Esel is expected to collect 8.7 million m3 due to the ratio of the impervious soil and rainfall quantity, Wadi Sharm El Bahari 2.1 million m3, Wadi Sharm El Qibli 1.6 million m3, and Wadi Wizer 1.04 million m3. Seven storage dams (SD1-SD7) were proposed to enhance the utilization of the surface water potentialities of this study area. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location map of this study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geomorphologic units (<b>A</b>) and Geologic units (<b>B</b>) prevail over this study area [<a href="#B19-water-16-03111" class="html-bibr">19</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of this study area (<b>left</b>), mountainous area (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Terrain variations of this study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Drainage basins of this study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The relation between the annual precipitation (mm) and the recurrence period (year) of the Gebel El Sibai watershed area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Streams distribution of the drainage basins in the Gebel El Sibai watershed area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Map showing kinds of soil covering this study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>A rainfall event occurred in the Gebel El Sibai watershed area (October 2016).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The hydrological model parameters of the Gebel El Sibai Watershed sub-basins.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Run-off hydrograph of Gebel El Sibai Watershed basins applying HEC-HMS hydrological model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Recommended storage dam locations of the Gebel El Sibai watershed area.</p>
Full article ">
45 pages, 41652 KiB  
Article
A Novel Hybrid Deep-Learning Approach for Flood-Susceptibility Mapping
by Abdelkader Riche, Ammar Drias, Mawloud Guermoui, Tarek Gherib, Tayeb Boulmaiz, Boularbah Souissi and Farid Melgani
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(19), 3673; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193673 - 1 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1330
Abstract
Flood-susceptibility mapping (FSM) is crucial for effective flood prediction and disaster prevention. Traditional methods of modeling flood vulnerability, such as the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), require weights defined by experts, while machine-learning and deep-learning approaches require extensive datasets. Remote sensing is also limited [...] Read more.
Flood-susceptibility mapping (FSM) is crucial for effective flood prediction and disaster prevention. Traditional methods of modeling flood vulnerability, such as the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), require weights defined by experts, while machine-learning and deep-learning approaches require extensive datasets. Remote sensing is also limited by the availability of images and weather conditions. We propose a new hybrid strategy integrating deep learning with the HEC–HMS and HEC–RAS physical models to overcome these challenges. In this study, we introduce a Weighted Residual U-Net (W-Res-U-Net) model based on the target of the HEC–HMS and RAS physical simulation without disregarding ground truth points by using two loss functions simultaneously. The W-Res-U-Net was trained on eight sub-basins and tested on five others, demonstrating superior performance with a sensitivity of 71.16%, specificity of 91.14%, and area under the curve (AUC) of 92.95% when validated against physical simulations, as well as a sensitivity of 88.89%, specificity of 93.07%, and AUC of 95.87% when validated against ground truth points. Incorporating a “Sigmoid Focal Loss” function and a dual-loss function improved the realism and performance of the model, achieving higher sensitivity, specificity, and AUC than HEC–RAS alone. This hybrid approach significantly enhances the FSM model, especially with limited real-world data. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Localization of study area [<a href="#B51-remotesensing-16-03673" class="html-bibr">51</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Topological architecture of the 2D feedforward CNN. (<b>a</b>) represents the feature extraction phase; (<b>b</b>) represents the extracted features; (<b>c</b>) is the food and non-food classification processes of an output [<a href="#B50-remotesensing-16-03673" class="html-bibr">50</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>U-net architecture (example for 32 × 32 pixels in the lowest resolution). Each blue box corresponds to a multi-channel feature map. The number of channels is denoted on top of the box. The x–y size is provided at the lower left edge of the box. White boxes represent copied feature maps. The arrows denote the different operations [<a href="#B56-remotesensing-16-03673" class="html-bibr">56</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Residual learning: a building block [<a href="#B59-remotesensing-16-03673" class="html-bibr">59</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Geospatial database for flood factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Geospatial database for flood factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Geospatial database for flood factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Flood-inventory data: Flooded area simulated by HEC-RAS on multiple scenarios and ground truth points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Sub-Basins division for training and test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Flow chart of the detailed steps of this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Architecture of our proposed weighted residual U-Net (W-Res-U-Net).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Roc curve train from 2000 to 2020, test in 2020 of: (<b>a</b>) same sub-basins; (<b>b</b>) other sub-basins.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Flooding maps Train from 2000 to 2020, test on 2020 in the same sub-basins for: (<b>a</b>) RF; (<b>b</b>) CNN; (<b>c</b>) Unet; (<b>d</b>) Res-Unet; and (<b>e</b>) HEC-HMS and RAS simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Flooding maps train from 2000 to 2020, test in 2020 in other sub-basins for: (<b>a</b>) RF; (<b>b</b>) CNN; (<b>c</b>) Unet; (<b>d</b>) Res-Unet; and (<b>e</b>) HEC-HMS and RAS simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>ROC curve trains from 2000 to 2020 and test on other sub-basins in 2020 using Sigmoid focal loss function.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Flood maps by comparing the “Sigmoid Focal Loss” function with the “Binary Cross-Entropy Loss” function for: (<b>a</b>) CNN, (<b>b</b>) Unet, (<b>c</b>) Res-Unet.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Metrics validation (Sensitivity and Specificity) versus Alpha values with: (<b>a</b>) HEC–RAS simulation. (<b>b</b>) Ground truth points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Flood maps by comparing the Alpha values “0”, “0.1”, “1” for: (<b>a</b>) CNN, (<b>b</b>) Unet, (<b>c</b>) W-Res-U-Net.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>ROC curve validation with ground truth points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Validation with ground truth points by comparing the limits of HEC–RAS simulation for: (<b>a</b>) CNN, (<b>b</b>) Unet, (<b>c</b>) W-Res-U-Net.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 6903 KiB  
Article
Sensitivity Analysis and Parameterization of Gridded and Lumped Models Representation for Heterogeneous Land Use and Land Cover
by Prakash Pudasaini, Thaine H. Assumpção, Andreja Jonoski and Ioana Popescu
Water 2024, 16(18), 2608; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16182608 - 14 Sep 2024
Viewed by 609
Abstract
Hydrological processes can be highly influenced by changes in land use land cover (LULC), which can make hydrological modelling also very sensitive to land cover characterization. Therefore, obtaining up-to-date LULC data is a crucial process in hydrological modelling, and as such, different sources [...] Read more.
Hydrological processes can be highly influenced by changes in land use land cover (LULC), which can make hydrological modelling also very sensitive to land cover characterization. Therefore, obtaining up-to-date LULC data is a crucial process in hydrological modelling, and as such, different sources of LULC data raises questions on their quality and applicability. This is especially true with new data sources, such as citizen science-based land cover maps. Therefore, this research aims to explore the influence of LULC data sources on hydrological models via their parameterization and by performing sensitivity analyses. Kiffissos catchment, in Greece, a poorly gauged and highly urbanized basin including the city of Athens, is the case study area. In total, 12 continuous hydrological models were developed by mainly varying their structure and parametrization (lumped and gridded) and using three LULC datasets: coordination of information on the environment (CORINE), Urban Atlas and Scent (citizen-based). It was found that excess precipitation is negligibly contributed to by soil saturation and is dominated by the runoff over impervious areas. Therefore, imperviousness was the main parameter influencing both sensitivity to land cover and parameterization. Lastly, although the parametrization as lumped and gridded models affected the representation of hydrological processes in pervious areas, it was not relevant in terms of excess precipitation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location map of (<b>A</b>) Greece, (<b>B</b>) Kifissos catchment with delineated study area (bottom left) and (<b>C</b>) study area with 21 sub-basins and observed discharge stations (right).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Land use land cover maps for (<b>A</b>) CORINE, (<b>B</b>) Urban Atlas and (<b>C</b>) Scent.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>A</b>) Calibration of basic lumped and gridded models and (<b>B</b>) validation of lumped and gridded models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Results of all variables for W08: (<b>A</b>) ET canopy, canopy storage, ET potential, ET surface and surface storage; (<b>B</b>) total precipitation, excess canopy, infiltration and excess precipitation; and (<b>C</b>) soil percolation and available moisture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>A</b>) Canopy storage, (<b>B</b>) excess canopy and infiltration and (<b>C</b>) evapotranspiration for W03, W08 and W20 of M0LC:CALC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>A</b>) Soil percolation, (<b>B</b>) saturated fraction for W08, W03 and W20 and total and excess precipitation for (<b>C</b>) W08, (<b>D</b>) W03 and (<b>E</b>) W20.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Precipitation distribution pattern for (<b>A</b>) total, (<b>B</b>) excess, (<b>C</b>) excess precipitation due to imperviousness, (<b>D</b>) excess precipitation due to soil saturation and (<b>E</b>) precipitation and imperviousness for all 21 sub-basins in percentage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Variables for CORINE, Urban Atlas and Scent models for W08 M0LC:CALC, M0LE:CALC and M0LS:CALC: (<b>A</b>) evapotranspiration, (<b>B</b>) excess precipitation, (<b>C</b>) saturated fraction and (<b>D</b>) total precipitation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Lumped vs gridded evapotranspiration for sub-catchment W08 for (<b>A</b>) CORINE, (<b>B</b>) Urban Atlas and (<b>C</b>) Scent and saturated fraction for (<b>D</b>) CORINE, (<b>E</b>) Urban Atlas and (<b>F</b>) Scent.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Excess precipitation for W08 for (<b>A</b>) CORINE, (<b>B</b>) Urban Atlas and (<b>C</b>) Scent and (<b>D</b>) total precipitation and imperviousness percentage for W08 for (<b>E</b>) CORINE, (<b>F</b>) Urban Atlas and (<b>G</b>) Scent.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Precipitation vs surface runoff for M0LC_CALC: (<b>A</b>) W08, (<b>B</b>) W03 and (<b>C</b>) W20.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Lumped and gridded models flow for J09, (<b>A</b>) lumped vs observed and (<b>B</b>) gridded vs observed, and J08, (<b>C</b>) lumped vs observed and (<b>D</b>) gridded vs observed.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 3763 KiB  
Article
Hydrologic Model Prediction Improvement in Karst Watersheds through Available Reservoir Capacity of Karst
by Lin Liao, Saeed Rad, Junfeng Dai, Asfandyar Shahab, Jingxuan Xu and Rui Xia
Sustainability 2024, 16(15), 6557; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156557 - 31 Jul 2024
Viewed by 968
Abstract
This study aimed to enhance flood forecasting accuracy in the Liangfeng River basin, a small karst watershed in Southern China, by incorporating the Available Reservoir Capacity of Karst (ARCK) into the HEC-HMS model. This region is often threatened by floods during the rainy [...] Read more.
This study aimed to enhance flood forecasting accuracy in the Liangfeng River basin, a small karst watershed in Southern China, by incorporating the Available Reservoir Capacity of Karst (ARCK) into the HEC-HMS model. This region is often threatened by floods during the rainy season, so an accurate flood forecast can help decision-makers better manage rivers. As a crucial influencing factor on karstic runoff, ARCK is often overlooked in hydrological models. The seasonal and volatile nature of ARCK makes the direct computation of its specific values challenging. In this study, a virtual reservoir for each sub-basin (total of 17) was introduced into the model to simulate the storage and release of ARCK-induced runoff phenomena. Simulations via the enhanced model for rainfall events with significant fluctuations in water levels during 2021–2022 revealed that the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) of the average simulation accuracy was improved by more than 34%. Normally, rainfalls (even heavy precipitations) during the dry season either do not generate runoff or cause negligible fluctuations in flow rates due to long intervals. Conversely, relatively frequent rainfall events (even light ones) during the wet season result in substantial runoff. Based on this observation, three distinct types of karstic reservoirs with different retaining/releasing capacities were defined, reflecting variations in both the frequency and volume of runoff during both seasons. As a real-time environmental variable, ARCK exhibits higher and lower values during the dry and rainy seasons, respectively, and we can better avoid the risk of flooding according to its special effects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Watershed Hydrology and Sustainable Water Environments)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The location and hydrological map of the Liangfeng River basin (<b>a</b>) and typical peak-forest karst in the study area (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The HEC-HMS model hydrological principles diagram (<b>a</b>) and the adopted diagram for the karstic watershed (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Three distinct types of karst reservoir related to ARCK runoff generation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Division of sub-basins and the river network in Liangfeng River basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The initial HEC-HMS simulation of six rainfall events: one with a high Nash value (<b>a</b>) and the others with poor simulation accuracy (<b>b</b>–<b>g</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Runoff in response to rainfall in the Liangfeng River basin during 2021 and 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Simulated hydrograph (blue line) versus actual hydrograph (red line) for the rainfall event (compared with <a href="#sustainability-16-06557-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>b–f) after incorporating the ARCK into the HEC-HMS model. (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) are the runoff results of 6 different dates simulated by the modified model).</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 3236 KiB  
Article
Flash Flood Potential Analysis and Hazard Mapping of Wadi Mujib Using GIS and Hydrological Modelling Approach
by Moayyad Shawaqfah, Yazan Ababneh, Alhaj-Saleh A. Odat, Fares AlMomani, Alaa Alomush, Fayez Abdullah and Hatem H. Almasaeid
Water 2024, 16(13), 1918; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16131918 - 5 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1223
Abstract
Jordan experienced flash floods that resulted in numerous fatalities and injuries. This research focuses on identifying the Wadi Mujib’s flash flood potential zones and evaluating their potential magnitude. In this work, hydrological models were developed by integrating GIS settings with HEC-HMS software (V. [...] Read more.
Jordan experienced flash floods that resulted in numerous fatalities and injuries. This research focuses on identifying the Wadi Mujib’s flash flood potential zones and evaluating their potential magnitude. In this work, hydrological models were developed by integrating GIS settings with HEC-HMS software (V. 4.11). The hydrological model for Wadi Mujib is simulated in this research by means of the Soil Conservation Service (curve number method) while using rainfall data from 1970 to 2022. The results show that the optimum curve number values (CN) were 78.5 at normal antecedent moisture content. Additionally, in order to aid in the decision-making process for flash flood warnings, a flash flood potential index (FFPI) was also introduced based on four main physiographic parameters (slope, land use, plant cover, and soil texture) ranging from 1 to 10. The accumulative chart’s FFPI threshold, which indicates the areas with the highest potential for flash floods, was set at 95% or above. The FFPI threshold was chosen using the accumulative chart of FFPI, which shows that the FFPM threshold value is 7 and covers 13.39% of the study area. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area location.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Wadi Mujib topography.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Land use/land cover of Wadi Mujib.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Soil texture of Wadi Mujib.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Vegetation cover of Wadi Mujib.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Isohyet and location map of metrological and rainfall station.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Slope map of Wadi Mujib.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The observed data compared with simulated volume.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Return period of Wadi Mujib.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Flow of flash flood at different return periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Flash flood potential map for Wadi Mujib.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Cumulative curve of FFP value with the 95th percentile.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 5118 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of GPM IMERG Satellite Precipitation Products in Event-Based Flood Modeling over the Sunshui River Basin in Southwestern China
by Xiaoyu Lyu, Zhanling Li and Xintong Li
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(13), 2333; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16132333 - 26 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1528
Abstract
This study evaluates the applicability of hourly Global Precipitation Measurement Mission (GPM) Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) data for event-based flood modeling in the Sunshui River Basin, southwestern China, using the hydrologic modeling system (HEC-HMS) model. The accuracies of IMERG V6, IMERG [...] Read more.
This study evaluates the applicability of hourly Global Precipitation Measurement Mission (GPM) Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) data for event-based flood modeling in the Sunshui River Basin, southwestern China, using the hydrologic modeling system (HEC-HMS) model. The accuracies of IMERG V6, IMERG V7, and the corrected IMERG V7 satellite precipitation products (SPPs) were assessed against ground rainfall observations. The performance of flood modeling based on the original and the corrected SPPs was then evaluated and compared. In addition, the ability of different numbers (one–eight) of ground stations to correct IMERG V7 data for flood modeling was investigated. The results indicate that IMERG V6 data generally underestimate the actual rainfall of the study area, while IMERG V7 and the corrected IMERG V7 data using the geographical discrepancy analysis (GDA) method overestimate rainfall. The corrected IMERG V7 data performed best in capturing the actual rainfall events, followed by IMERG V7 and IMERG V6 data, respectively. The IMERG V7-generated flood hydrographs exhibited the same trend as those of the measured data, yet the former generally overestimated the flood peak due to its overestimation of rainfall. The corrected IMERG V7 data led to superior event-based flood modeling performance compared to the other datasets. Furthermore, when the number of ground stations used to correct the IMERG V7 data in the study area was greater than or equal to four, the flood modeling performance was satisfactory. The results confirm the applicability of IMERG V7 data for fine time scales in event-based flood modeling and reveal that using the GDA method to correct SPPs can greatly enhance the accuracy of flood modeling. This study can act as a basis for flood research in data-scarce areas. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The framework of this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Location of the Sunshui River basin in China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Land use types (<b>a</b>) and soil types (<b>b</b>) in the Sunshui River basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Distributions of satellite grid points and ground gauge stations in the Sunshui River basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Scatter plot of IMERG V6, V7, and corrected IMERG V7 data with ground observation data. The value of the color bar represents the density value of the color in the scatter plot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Simulated and observed flood hydrographs from 2014 to 2016 in the Sunshui River basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Simulated and observed flood hydrographs from 2017 to 2018 in the Sunshui River basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Flood modeling based on the corrected IMERG V7 data using one to eight ground gauge stations in the Sunshui River basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Boxplot of the evaluation indicators for flood modeling based on the corrected IMERG V7 data using one to eight ground gauge stations in the Sunshui River basin (Black diamonds in the box plot indicate outliers. The red, blue, and green dashed lines represent the thresholds of the model performance levels for ‘satisfactory’, ‘good’, and ‘very good’, respectively).</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 6759 KiB  
Article
Flash Flood Risk Assessment in the Asir Region, Southwestern Saudi Arabia, Using a Physically-Based Distributed Hydrological Model and GPM IMERG Satellite Rainfall Data
by Abdelrahim Salih and Abdalhaleem Hassablla
Atmosphere 2024, 15(6), 624; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15060624 - 23 May 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1446
Abstract
Floods in southwestern Saudi Arabia, especially in the Asir region, are among the major natural disasters caused by natural and human factors. In this region, flash floods that occur in the Wadi Hail Basin greatly affect human life and activities, damaging property, the [...] Read more.
Floods in southwestern Saudi Arabia, especially in the Asir region, are among the major natural disasters caused by natural and human factors. In this region, flash floods that occur in the Wadi Hail Basin greatly affect human life and activities, damaging property, the built environment, infrastructure, landscapes, and facilities. A previous study carried out for the same basin has effectively revealed zones of flood risk using such an approach. However, the utilization of the HEC–HMS (Hydrologic Engineering Center–Hydrologic Modeling System) model and IMERG data for delineating areas prone to flash floods remain unexplored. In response to this advantage, this work primarily focused on flood generation assessment in the Wadi Hail Basin, one of the major basins in the region that is frequently prone to severe flash flood damage, from a single extreme rainfall event. We employed a fully physical-based, distributed hydrological model run with HEC–HMS software version 4.11 and Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals of Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG V.06) data, as well as other geo-environmental variables, to simulate the water flow within the Wadi Basin, and predict flash flood hazard. Discharge from the wadi and its sub-basins was predicted using 1 mm rainfall over an 8-h occurrence time. Significant peak discharge (3.6 m3/s) was found in eastern and southern upstream sub-basins and crossing points, rather than those downstream, due to their high-density drainage network (0.12) and CNs (88.4). Generally, four flood hazard levels were identified in the study basin: ‘low risk’, ‘moderate risk’, ‘high risk’, and ‘very high risk’. It was found that 43.8% of the total area of the Wadi Hail Basin is highly prone to flooding. Furthermore, medium- and low-hazard areas make up 4.5–11.2% of the total area, respectively. We found that the peak discharge value of sub-basin 11 (1.8 m3/s) covers 13.2% of the total Wadi Hail area; so, it poses more flood risk than other Wadi Hail sub-basins. The obtained results demonstrated the usefulness of the methods used to develop useful hydrological information in a region lacking ungagged data. This study will play a useful role in identifying the impact of extreme rainfall events on locations that may be susceptible to flash flooding, which will help authorities to develop flood management strategies, particularly in response to extreme events. The study results have potential and valuable policy implications for planners and decision-makers regarding infrastructural development and ensuring environmental stability. The study recommends further research to understand how flash flood hazards correlate with changes at different land use/cover (LULC) classes. This could refine flash flood hazards results and maximize its effectiveness. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of the study region: on the left side is a map of Saudi Arabia while on the right side is the study site location (Wadi Hail), which is located in Asir Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Topographic characteristics of Wadi Hail, where (<b>a</b>) is the surface elevation (m) and (<b>b</b>) is the slope (degrees).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Average annual rainfall regime in the wadi catchment. This was interpolated from data obtained from the Precipitation Measurement Mission (PMM) website (<a href="http://pmm.nasa.gov/data-access/download/gpm" target="_blank">http://pmm.nasa.gov/data-access/download/gpm</a>, accessed on 22 November 2023). The numbers show the sub-basins ID, according to the HEC-HMS model output.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>A simplified flowchart of the adopted methodology of HEC–HMS model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Landsat imagery (bands 5, 4, &amp; 3), (<b>b</b>) LULC of the wadi basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) SRTM-DEM and (<b>b</b>) delineated drainage network (blue lines) using 8D flow direction algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Soil texture and (<b>b</b>) surface geological data for Wadi Hail Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The hydrological soil group map (HSG) of the wadi’s catchments. The numbers show the sub-basins ID, according to the HEC-HMS model output.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Cumulative curve number (CN) map of the stream watersheds. The numbers show the sub-basins ID, according to the HEC-HMS model output.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Total IMERG rainfall (<b>a</b>) Late, (<b>b</b>) Early, and (<b>c</b>) Final for the 23 May 2015 event over the Saudi Arabia regions. The blue frame shows the location of the study basin. For more clarification, the rainfall over the wadi catchment was clipped and showed in <a href="#atmosphere-15-00624-f011" class="html-fig">Figure 11</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Rainfall totals (presented as (<b>a</b>) Final, (<b>b</b>) Early, and (<b>c</b>) Late) over the Wadi Hail catchment for the 23 May 2015 storm event estimated by the three IMERG products utilizing the IDW interpolation algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Modeled hydrographs showing the range of expected discharges for the five selected sub-basins of Wadi Hail under hypothetical 1 mm rainstorms for 8 h. The numbers in the upper right inset show the subbasins ID, according to the HEC-HMS model output.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>A map view depicting the 20 upstream sub-basins that drain toward the Red Sea and their risk levels on the King Abdulaziz Highway. These risk levels were classified based on the sub-basins’ physiographic characteristics, drainage density, soil texture, and peak discharge (<a href="#atmosphere-15-00624-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>). The numbers in the upper right inset show the subbasins ID, according to the HEC-HMS model output. In the right side is a close-up view of the site classified as being at extreme flood risk.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Model-derived hydrographs of the six selected sub-basins: (<b>a</b>) sub-basin 1, (<b>b</b>) sub-basin 5, (<b>c</b>) sub-basin 6, (<b>d</b>) sub-basin 15, (<b>e</b>) sub-basin 23, and (<b>f</b>) sub-basin 11, because of the March 2015 rainstorm. Sub-basin number 11 was selected as the basin that was characterized by a high level of flood risk due to its physiographic characteristics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The three-dimensional “oblique perspective” of the downstream area of Wadi Hail. Where, (<b>a</b>) is a Multispectral Landsat image overlaid on a 90 m SRTM-DEM. The white arrow indicates the city of Muhayil, (<b>b</b>) is a zoomed area of sub-basin No. 11. With many houses surrounding this area, the risk of flood inundation remains a concern. The blue lines show the closest stream to the city of Muhayil, while the white arrows indicate areas at risk of flooding.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 16506 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Near Real-Time Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Precipitation Products for Hydrological Modelling and Flood Inundation Mapping of Sparsely Gauged Large Transboundary Basins—A Case Study of the Brahmaputra Basin
by Muhammad Jawad, Biswa Bhattacharya, Adele Young and Schalk Jan van Andel
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(10), 1756; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16101756 - 15 May 2024
Viewed by 1085
Abstract
Limited availability of hydrometeorological data and lack of data sharing practices have added to the challenge of hydrological modelling of large and transboundary catchments. This research evaluates the suitability of latest near real-time global precipitation measurement (GPM)-era satellite precipitation products (SPPs), IMERG-Early, IMERG-Late [...] Read more.
Limited availability of hydrometeorological data and lack of data sharing practices have added to the challenge of hydrological modelling of large and transboundary catchments. This research evaluates the suitability of latest near real-time global precipitation measurement (GPM)-era satellite precipitation products (SPPs), IMERG-Early, IMERG-Late and GSMaP-NRT, for hydrological and hydrodynamic modelling of the Brahmaputra Basin. The HEC-HMS modelling system was used for the hydrological modelling of the Brahmaputra Basin, using IMERG-Early, IMERG-Late, and GSMaP-NRT. The findings showed good results using GPM SPPs for hydrological modelling of large basins like Brahmaputra, with Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and R2 values in the range of 0.75–0.85, and root mean square error (RMSE) between 7000 and 9000 m3 s−1, and the average discharge was 20611 m3 s−1. Output of the GPM-based hydrological models was then used as input to a 1D hydrodynamic model to assess suitability for flood inundation mapping of the Brahmaputra River. Simulated flood extents were compared with Landsat satellite-captured images of flood extents. In critical areas along the river, the probability of detection (POD) and critical success index (CSI) values were above 0.70 with all the SPPs used in this study. The accuracy of the models was found to increase when simulated using SPPs corrected with ground-based precipitation datasets. It was also found that IMERG-Late performed better than the other two precipitation products as far as hydrological modelling was concerned. However, for flood inundation mapping, all of the three selected products showed equally good results. The conclusion is reached that for sparsely gauged large basins, particularly for trans-boundary ones, GPM-era SPPs can be used for discharge simulation and flood inundation mapping. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Hydrology and Water Resources Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Catchment boundary of Brahmaputra Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart representing the methodology adopted for this research.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Location of areas for flood extent validation of the hydraulic model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Validation hydrograph generated with (<b>a</b>) dataset 1, showing that low flows were not predicted well, but high flows showed a good match with observed flows; (<b>b</b>) 2, performed very similarly, a with a small improvement in low flows; (<b>c</b>) 3, both high and low flows visually performed close to observed flows; (<b>d</b>) 4, with addition of IMD data, the low flow overestimation problem of case a was resolved considerably; (<b>e</b>) 5, performed very similarly to case d with a small improvement; and (<b>f</b>) 6, both high and low flows were predicted well by the model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Taylor diagram for model performance in validation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Validation of hydraulic model (WL) at Bahadurabad.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Accuracy of the simulated inundation maps based on IMERG-Late precipitation dataset against corresponding DFO rasters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Performance indicators of the hydraulic model for the flood event on 14 August 2017 with SPP (<b>a</b>) 1, (<b>b</b>) 2, (<b>c</b>) 3, (<b>d</b>) 4, (<b>e</b>) 5, (<b>f</b>) 6 and for the flood event on 16 July 2019 with SPP (<b>g</b>) 1, (<b>h</b>) 2, (<b>i</b>) 3, (<b>j</b>) 4, (<b>k</b>) 5, (<b>l</b>) 6.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop