[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 

Forestry Remote Sensing: Biomass, Changes and Ecology

A special issue of Forests (ISSN 1999-4907). This special issue belongs to the section "Forest Inventory, Modeling and Remote Sensing".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (19 July 2023) | Viewed by 27488

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650233, China
Interests: forest monitoring; forest scattering mechanisms at microwave bands; crop growth monitoring and identification; forest height inversion using PolInSAR technology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
Interests: forest carbon; process based model; ecological remote sensing
Research Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, Chinese Academy of Forestry, DongXiaoFu No. 1, XiangShan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100091, China
Interests: forest parameter inversion method of polarimetric SAR; interferometric SAR and polarimetric interferometric SAR; topography radiometric correction algorithm of SAR images
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Co-Guest Editor

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues, 

Forest biomass, changes, and ecology monitoring is important for characterizing forest growth, mortality, deforestation and associated carbon flux components between forests and the atmosphere. Over the past few years, remote sensing techniques have become the most practical way to assess this at large scales. Currently, significant progress has been made in this field, with well-developed approaches including design-based, model-based, and model-assisted ones and using multi-resource remote sensing data including multispectral, hyperspectral, LiDAR (e.g., the new spaceborne GEDI and ICESat-2), interferometric SAR (InSAR), and polarimetric interferometric SAR (PolInSAR). However, until now, there is a strong investigation into reducing limitations in the analysis of forest remote sensing by exploiting innovative methods and techniques. These new trends aim at increasing the accuracy and generalizability of the monitoring of carbon storage and carbon sequestration potential in forest-covered areas.

Considering the importance and critical requirement for above-mentioned research gaps in forest biomass, changes, and ecology monitoring using remote sensing technology, this Special Issue focuses on collecting new insights, novel approaches and the latest discoveries in the field of forest biomass, carbon storage and carbon sequestration potential estimation. We are also inviting papers on monitoring forest changes, deforestation, and forest ecology.

Prof. Dr. Wangfei Zhang
Dr. Min Yan
Dr. Lei Zhao
Dr. Armando Marino
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Forests is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • remote sensing
  • biomass estimation
  • changes detection
  • ecology monitoring
  • carbon storage
  • carbon sequestration potential estimation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (12 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 5785 KiB  
Article
Interpreting the Response of Forest Stock Volume with Dual Polarization SAR Images in Boreal Coniferous Planted Forest in the Non-Growing Season
by Huanna Zheng, Jiangping Long, Zhuo Zang, Hui Lin, Zhaohua Liu, Tingchen Zhang and Peisong Yang
Forests 2023, 14(9), 1700; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091700 - 23 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1252
Abstract
Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar (PolSAR) images with dual polarization modes have great potential to map forest stock volume (FSV) by excellent penetration capabilities and distinct microwave scattering processes. However, the response of these SAR data to FSV is still uncertain in the non-growing [...] Read more.
Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar (PolSAR) images with dual polarization modes have great potential to map forest stock volume (FSV) by excellent penetration capabilities and distinct microwave scattering processes. However, the response of these SAR data to FSV is still uncertain in the non-growing season. To further interpret the response of FSV to different dual polarization SAR images, three types of dual polarization SAR images (GF-3, Sentinel-1, and ALOS-2) were initially acquired in coniferous planted forest in the non-growing season. Then, sensitivity between FSV and all alternative features extracted from each type of SAR image was analyzed to express the response of FSV to dual polarization SAR images with bands and polarization modes in the non-growing season in deciduous (Larch) and evergreen (Chinese pine) forests. Finally, mapped FSV using single and combined dual polarization images were derived by optimal feature sets and four machine learning models, respectively. The combined effects were also analyzed to clarify the difference of bands and polarization modes in deciduous and evergreen forests in the non-growing season. The results demonstrated that the backscattering energy from different sensors is significantly different in Chinese pine, and the difference is gradually reduced in Larch forests. It is also implied that the polarization mode is more important than penetration capability in mapping forest FSV in deciduous forest in the non-growing season. By comparing the accuracy of mapped FSV using single and combined images, combined images have more capability to improve the accuracy and reliability of mapped FSV. Meanwhile, it is confirmed that compensation effects with bands and polarization modes not only have great potential to delay the saturation phenomenon, but also have the capability to reduce errors caused by overestimation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forestry Remote Sensing: Biomass, Changes and Ecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The location of the study area and maps of ground samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The distribution of sorted FSV; (<b>a</b>) is for Chinese pine and (<b>b</b>) is for Larch.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Framework for mapping FSV with dual polarization SAR data. (A + G:ALOS-2 + GF-3; A + S:ALOS-2 + Sentinel-1; A + S + G:ALOS-2 + Sentinel-1 + GF-3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The scatterplot of backscattering energy with multi-bands and polarization modes; (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) are for planted Chinese pine, (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) are for planted Larch.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The features with sensitivity ranking within the top 10 of planted Chinese pine and Larch in different sensors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The scatter plots of estimating FSV using the models with the highest accuracy of results from each type of data; the red dashed line is the fitted line, and the color of the points is determined by the residual between the predicted and ground-measured FSV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The scatter plots of estimating FSV based on combined-bands SAR data for two tree species.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial distribution of predicted FSVs obtained from ALOS-2+Sentinel-1+GF-3 in Chinese pine and Larch. (<b>a</b>) is from a machine learning model with SVR for Chinese pine; (<b>b</b>) is from a machine learning model with KNN for Larch.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The result of mapping FSV using single band SAR images and combined SAR images. (<b>a</b>) is for Chinese pine forests and (<b>b</b>) is for Larch forests.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 4243 KiB  
Article
Forest Canopy Cover Inversion Exploration Using Multi-Source Optical Data and Combined Methods
by Yuan Guan, Xin Tian, Wangfei Zhang, Armando Marino, Jimao Huang, Yingwu Mao and Han Zhao
Forests 2023, 14(8), 1527; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14081527 - 26 Jul 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1393
Abstract
An accurate estimation of canopy cover can provide an important basis for forest ecological management by understanding the forest status and change patterns. The aim of this paper is to investigate the four methods of the random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), [...] Read more.
An accurate estimation of canopy cover can provide an important basis for forest ecological management by understanding the forest status and change patterns. The aim of this paper is to investigate the four methods of the random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), and k-nearest neighbor with fast iterative features selection (KNN-FIFS) for modeling forest canopy cover, and to evaluate three mainstream optical data sources—Landsat8 OLI, Sentinel-2A, Gaofen-1 (GF-1)—and three types of data combined comparatively by selecting the optimal modeling method. The paper uses the Daxinganling Ecological Station of Genhe City, Inner Mongolia, as the research area, and is based on three types of multispectral remote sensing data, extracting spectral characteristics, textural characteristics, terrain characteristics; the Kauth–Thomas transform (K-T transform); and color transformation characteristics (HIS). The optimal combination of features was selected using three feature screening methods, namely stepwise regression, RF, and KNN-FIFS, and the four methods: RF, SVR KNN, and KNN-FIFS, were combined to carry out the evaluation analysis regarding the accuracy of forest canopy cover modeling: (1) In this study, a variety of remote sensing features were introduced, and the feature variables were selected by different parameter preference methods and then employed in modeling. Based on the four modeling inversion methods, the KNN-FIFS model achieves the best accuracy: the Landsat8 OLI with R2 = 0.60, RMSE = 0.11, and RMSEr = 14.64% in the KNN-FIFS model; the Sentinel-2A with R2 = 0.80, RMSE = 0.08, and RMSEr = 11.63% in the KNN-FIFS model; the GF-1 with R2 = 0.55, RMSE = 0.12, and RMSEr = 15.04% in the KNN-FIFS model; and the federated data with R2 = 0.82, RMSE = 0.08, and RMSEr = 10.40% in the KNN-FIFS model; (2) the three multispectral datasets have the ability to estimate forest canopy cover, and the modeling accuracy superior under the combination of multi-source data features; (3) under different optical data, KNN- FIFS achieves the best accuracy in the established nonparametric model, and its feature optimization method is better than that of the random forest optimization method. For the same model, the estimation result of the joint data is better than the single optical data; thus, the KNN-FIFS model, with specific parameters, can significantly improve the inversion accuracy and efficiency of forest canopy cover evaluation from different data sources. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forestry Remote Sensing: Biomass, Changes and Ecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographical location of the study area of the Daxinganling Ecological Station.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>LiDAR canopy cover of the Daxinganling Ecological Station.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Scatter plot of the accuracy verification results of Landsat8 OLI: (<b>a</b>) estimated canopy cover of RF; (<b>b</b>) estimated canopy cover of SVR; (<b>c</b>) estimated canopy cover of KNN; (<b>d</b>) estimated canopy cover of KNN-FIFS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Scatter plot of the accuracy verification results of Sentinel-2A: (<b>a</b>) estimated canopy cover of RF; (<b>b</b>) estimated canopy cover of SVR; (<b>c</b>) estimated canopy cover of KNN; (<b>d</b>) estimated canopy cover of KNN-FIFS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Scatter plot of the accuracy verification results of GF-1: (<b>a</b>) estimated canopy cover of RF; (<b>b</b>) estimated canopy cover of SVR; (<b>c</b>) estimated canopy cover of KNN; (<b>d</b>) estimated canopy cover of KNN-FIFS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Scatter plot of the accuracy verification results of three data combinations: (<b>a</b>) estimated canopy cover of RF; (<b>b</b>) estimated canopy cover of SVR; (<b>c</b>) estimated canopy cover of KNN; (<b>d</b>) estimated canopy cover of KNN-FIFS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Canopy cover map of Daxinganling Ecological Station: (<b>a</b>) canopy cover map from Landsat8 OLI; (<b>b</b>) canopy cover map from Sentinel-2A; (<b>c</b>) canopy cover map from GF-1; (<b>d</b>) canopy cover map showing data combinations.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 16612 KiB  
Article
Estimation of Species-Scale Canopy Chlorophyll Content in Mangroves from UAV and GF-6 Data
by Liangchao Deng, Bowei Chen, Min Yan, Bolin Fu, Zhenyu Yang, Bo Zhang and Li Zhang
Forests 2023, 14(7), 1417; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071417 - 11 Jul 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1843
Abstract
The growth of mangroves is inhibited due to environmental degradation, and changes in the growing health of mangrove forests cause changes in internal physicochemical parameters. The canopy chlorophyll content is an important indicator to monitor the health status of mangroves. We study the [...] Read more.
The growth of mangroves is inhibited due to environmental degradation, and changes in the growing health of mangrove forests cause changes in internal physicochemical parameters. The canopy chlorophyll content is an important indicator to monitor the health status of mangroves. We study the effective inversion data sources and methods of mangrove health indicator parameters to monitor the health of mangrove ecosystems in typical areas of Beibu Gulf, Guangxi. In this study, we evaluated the capability of UAV, GF-6 data, and machine learning regression algorithms in estimating mangrove species-scale canopy chlorophyll content (CCC). Effective measures for mangrove pest and disease pressure, Sporobolus alterniflorus invasion, and anthropogenic risk are also explored, which are important for mangrove conservation and restoration. (1) We obtained several feature variables by constructing a combined vegetation index, and the most sensitive band of mangrove CCC was selected by the characteristic variable evaluation, and the CCC model at the mangrove species-scale was evaluated and validated. Through variable preferences, the feature variables with the highest contribution of Avicennia marina, Aegiceras corniculatum, Kandelia candel, and a collection of three categories of species in the UAV data were indices of RI35, MDATT413, RI35, and NDI35. (2) Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Regression Tree, and Extreme Gradient Boosting were evaluated using the root-mean-square error and coefficient of determination accuracy metrics. Extreme Gradient Boosting regression algorithms were evaluated for accuracy. In both UAV data and GF-6, RF achieved optimal results in inverse mangrove Aegiceras corniculatum species CCC, with higher stability and robustness in machine learning regressors. (3) Due to the sparse distribution of Kandelia candel in the study area and the low spatial resolution of the images, there is an increased possibility that individual image elements contain environmental noise, such as soil. Therefore, the level of CCC can effectively reflect the health status of mangroves and further reflect the increased possibility of the study area being exposed to risks, such as degradation. The establishment of the current protected areas and restoration of degraded ecosystems are effective measures to cope with the risks of mangrove pest and disease stress, invasion of Sporobolus alterniflorus, and anthropogenic activities, which are important for the protection and restoration of mangroves. This study provides an important data reference and risk warning for mangrove restoration and conservation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forestry Remote Sensing: Biomass, Changes and Ecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of study area and distribution of measured points. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) The location of Guangxi Province, China, and the coastal zone in the study. (<b>c</b>) The map of mangrove extent in Sajiao village, a typical study area in Beibu Gulf, Guangxi, with a false color image from the combination of bands 4, 3, and 2 of GF-6; black vector linear elements mark the mangrove extent in the typical study area, and green dot elements mark the distribution of ground collected data. (<b>d</b>) The false color image of Landsat 8 OLI sensor in the Beibu Gulf area of Guangxi, with red vector border marking the mangrove area range.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>UAV images and field photos of AM, AC, and KC: (<b>a</b>), (<b>b</b>) and (<b>c</b>) indicate AM, AC, and KC photographs taken in the field; (<b>d</b>) is a photo of the UAV taking off; (<b>e</b>), (<b>f</b>) and (<b>g</b>) denote the AM, AC, and KC multispectral photographs taken by the UAV, respectively; (<b>h</b>) is a multispectral image of mangroves throughout the study area, and the red squares from left to right are shown enlarged in (<b>e</b>), (<b>f</b>), and (<b>g</b>) respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Mangrove CCC inversion flowchart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Heat map of correlation among AM, AC, KC, and AM + AC + KC characteristic indices in UAV image. (<b>a</b>) Heat map of correlation of AM specie; (<b>b</b>) Heat map of correlation of AC specie; (<b>c</b>) Heat map of correlation of KC specie; (<b>d</b>) Heat map of correlation of AM + AC + KC species. The numbers “23”, “25”, and “213” mean the name of the band corresponding to the combined vegetation index, such as NDI23, which represents the combined vegetation index consisting of band 2 and band 3 in UAV data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Heat map of correlation among AM, AC, KC, and AM + AC + KC characteristic indices in GF-6 image. (<b>a</b>) Heat map of correlation of AM specie; (<b>b</b>) Heat map of correlation of AC specie; (<b>c</b>) Heat map of correlation of KC specie; (<b>d</b>) Heat map of correlation of AM + AC + KC species.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Stacked bar charts of the importance scores of feature indices in UAV, and GF-6 data. (<b>a</b>) Importance scores of UAV and GF-6 data in AM; (<b>b</b>) Importance scores of UAV and GF-6 data in AC; (<b>c</b>) Importance scores of UAV and GF-6 data in KC; (<b>d</b>) Importance scores of UAV and GF-6 data in AM + AC + KC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Accuracy of fitting curves for inversion of MLR in UAV data. (<b>a</b>) Fitting accuracy of AM; (<b>b</b>) Fitting accuracy of AC; (<b>c</b>) Fitting accuracy of KC; (<b>d</b>) Fitting accuracy of AM + AC + KC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Accuracy of fitting curves for inversion of MLR in GF-6 data. (<b>a</b>) Fitting accuracy of AM; (<b>b</b>) Fitting accuracy of AC; (<b>c</b>) Fitting accuracy of KC; (<b>d</b>) Fitting accuracy of AM + AC + KC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Accuracy of optimal machine learning regression models for inversion of mangrove CCC in UAV and GF-6 data. (<b>a</b>) Prediction accuracy of UAV data feature variables in AM; (<b>b</b>) Prediction accuracy of UAV data feature variables in AC; (<b>c</b>) Prediction accuracy of UAV data feature variables in KC; (<b>d</b>) Prediction accuracy of UAV data feature variables in AM + AC + KC; (<b>e</b>) Prediction accuracy of GF-6 data feature variables in AM; (<b>f</b>) Prediction accuracy of GF-6 data feature variables in AC; (<b>g</b>) Prediction accuracy of GF-6 data feature variables in KC; (<b>h</b>) Prediction accuracy of GF-6 data feature variables in AM + AC + KC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) are the photo acquisition points at (<b>e</b>); (<b>e</b>) Spatial distribution of mangrove CCC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Residual and standard deviation distributions of RF, GBRT, and XGBoost model training in AM species in UAV data. (<b>a</b>) Residual and standard deviation distributions of RF model; (<b>b</b>) Residual and standard deviation distributions of GBRT model; (<b>c</b>) Residual and standard deviation distributions of XGBoost model.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Semicircular pie charts of correlation among AM, AC, KC, and AM + AC + KC characteristic indices in UAV data. (<b>a</b>) Correlation coefficient of AM; (<b>b</b>) Correlation coefficient of AC; (<b>c</b>) Correlation coefficient of KC; (<b>d</b>) Correlation coefficient of AM + AC + KC.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Semicircular pie charts of correlation among AM, AC, KC, and AM + AC + KC characteristic indices in GF-6 data. (<b>a</b>) Correlation coefficient of AM; (<b>b</b>) Correlation coefficient of AC; (<b>c</b>) Correlation coefficient of KC; (<b>d</b>) Correlation coefficient of AM + AC + KC.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Box plot of the importance ranking of feature indices in UAV, and GF-6 data. (<b>a</b>) Importance ranking of UAV data feature variables in AM; (<b>b</b>) Importance ranking of UAV data feature variables in AC; (<b>c</b>) Importance ranking of UAV data feature variables in KC; (<b>d</b>) Importance ranking of UAV data feature variables in AM + AC + KC; (<b>e</b>) Importance ranking of GF-6 data feature variables in AM; (<b>f</b>) Importance ranking of GF-6 data feature variables in AC; (<b>g</b>) Importance ranking of GF-6 data feature variables in KC; (<b>h</b>) Importance ranking of GF-6 data feature variables in AM + AC + KC.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 10204 KiB  
Article
Forest Height Inversion via RVoG Model and Its Uncertainties Analysis via Bayesian Framework—Comparisons of Different Wavelengths and Baselines
by Yongxin Zhang, Han Zhao, Yongjie Ji, Tingwei Zhang and Wangfei Zhang
Forests 2023, 14(7), 1408; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071408 - 10 Jul 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2104
Abstract
Accurate estimation of forest height over a large area is beneficial to reduce the uncertainty of forest carbon sink estimation, which is of great significance to the terrestrial carbon cycle, global climate change, forest resource management, and forest-related scientific research. Forest height inversion [...] Read more.
Accurate estimation of forest height over a large area is beneficial to reduce the uncertainty of forest carbon sink estimation, which is of great significance to the terrestrial carbon cycle, global climate change, forest resource management, and forest-related scientific research. Forest height inversion using polarimetric interferometry synthetic aperture radar (PolInSAR) data through Random volume over ground (RVoG) models has demonstrated great potential for large-area forest height mapping. However, the wavelength and baseline length used for the PolInSAR data acquisition plays an important role during the forest height estimation procedure. In this paper, X–, C–, L–, and P–band PolInSAR datasets with four different baseline lengths were simulated and applied to explore the effects of wavelength and baseline length on forest height inversion using RVoG models. Hierarchical Bayesian models developed with a likelihood function of RVoG model were developed for estimated results uncertainty quantification and decrease. Then a similar procedure was applied in the L– and P–band airborne PolInSAR datasets with three different baselines for each band. The results showed that (1) Wavelength showed obvious effects on forest height inversion results with the RVoG model. For the simulated PolInSAR datasets, the L– and P–bands performed better than the X– and C–bands. The best performance was obtained at the P–band with a baseline combination of 10 × 4 m with an absolute error of 0.05 m and an accuracy of 97%. For the airborne PolInSAR datasets, an L–band with the longest baseline of 24 m in this study showed the best performance with R2 = 0.64, RMSE = 3.32 m, and Acc. = 77.78%. (2) It is crucial to select suitable baseline lengths to obtain accurate forest height estimation results. In the four baseline combinations of simulated PolInSAR datasets, the baseline combination of 10 × 4 m both at the L– and P–bands performed best than other baseline combinations. While for the airborne PolInSAR datasets, the longest baseline in three different baselines obtained the highest accuracy at both L– and P–bands. (3) Bayesian framework is useful for estimation results uncertainty quantification and decrease. The uncertainties related to wavelength and baseline length. The uncertainties were reduced obviously at longer wavelengths and suitable baselines. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forestry Remote Sensing: Biomass, Changes and Ecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Forest scene of broadleaf forest. (<b>a</b>) X–band; (<b>b</b>) C–band; (<b>c</b>) L–band; (<b>d</b>) P–band.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Interference phase (L–band). (<b>a</b>) Interferogram before de–flattening; (<b>b</b>) Flat Earth Phase; (<b>c</b>) Interferogram after de–flattening.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p><span class="html-italic">k<sub>z</sub></span> of each band at different baselines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Location of the study area in Sweden.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>P–band interferometric phase in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>P–band interferometric coherence amplitude imagen the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Forest height inversion results. (<b>a</b>) 10 × 2 m; (<b>b</b>) 10 × 4 m; (<b>c</b>) 10 × 6 m; (<b>d</b>) 10 × 8 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Forest height inversion results. (<b>a</b>) 10 × 2 m; (<b>b</b>) 10 × 4 m; (<b>c</b>) 10 × 6 m; (<b>d</b>) 10 × 8 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>CDF of the inversed forest height using X–, C–, L–, and P–band PolInSAR datasets with different baseline combinations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Two–dimensional histogram between uncertainties of estimated forest height and the forest height estimated using RVoG models. (<b>a</b>) 10 × 2 m; (<b>b</b>) 10 × 4 m; (<b>c</b>) 10 × 6 m; (<b>d</b>) 10 × 8 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Two–dimensional histogram between uncertainties of estimated forest height and the forest height estimated using RVoG models. (<b>a</b>) 10 × 2 m; (<b>b</b>) 10 × 4 m; (<b>c</b>) 10 × 6 m; (<b>d</b>) 10 × 8 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The inversed forest height using RVoG models and L–and P–band PolInSAR datasets. (<b>a</b>) L–band (18 m spatial baseline); (<b>b</b>) P–band (24 m spatial baseline); (<b>c</b>) Spatial distribution of selected forest stands and validation plots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Scatterplot of estimated accuracy. (<b>a</b>) L–band (6 m spatial baseline); (<b>b</b>) P–band (8 m spatial baseline); (<b>c</b>) L–band (12 m spatial baseline); (<b>d</b>) P–band (16 m spatial baseline); (<b>e</b>) L–band (18 m spatial baseline); (<b>f</b>) P–band (24 m spatial baseline).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11 Cont.
<p>Scatterplot of estimated accuracy. (<b>a</b>) L–band (6 m spatial baseline); (<b>b</b>) P–band (8 m spatial baseline); (<b>c</b>) L–band (12 m spatial baseline); (<b>d</b>) P–band (16 m spatial baseline); (<b>e</b>) L–band (18 m spatial baseline); (<b>f</b>) P–band (24 m spatial baseline).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Standard deviation of RVoG height and two–dimensional histogram of RVoG height. (<b>a</b>) L–band (6 m spatial baseline); (<b>b</b>) L–band (12 m spatial baseline); (<b>c</b>) L–band (18 m spatial baseline); (<b>d</b>) P–band (8 m spatial baseline); (<b>e</b>) P–band (16 m spatial baseline); (<b>f</b>) P–band (24 m spatial baseline).</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 7898 KiB  
Article
Spatial Effects Analysis on Individual-Tree Aboveground Biomass in a Tropical Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis Natural Forest in Yunnan, Southwestern China
by Xilin Zhang, Guoqi Chen, Chunxiao Liu, Qinling Fan, Wenfang Li, Yong Wu, Hui Xu and Guanglong Ou
Forests 2023, 14(6), 1177; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14061177 - 7 Jun 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1679
Abstract
It is essential to analyze the spatial autocorrelation and heterogeneity of aboveground biomass (AGB). But it is difficult to accurately describe due to the lack of data in clear-cutting plots. Thus, measuring the AGB directly in a clear-cutting plot can provide a reference [...] Read more.
It is essential to analyze the spatial autocorrelation and heterogeneity of aboveground biomass (AGB). But it is difficult to accurately describe due to the lack of data in clear-cutting plots. Thus, measuring the AGB directly in a clear-cutting plot can provide a reference for accurately describing the spatial variation. Therefore, a 0.3-hectare clear-cutting sample plot of Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis natural forest was selected, and the AGB was calculated by each component. The intra-group variance was quantitatively described in terms of spatial heterogeneity, and the spatial autocorrelation was explored by global and local Moran’s I. The results indicated that (1) there was different spatial heterogeneity for the different trees and organs. The intra-group variance tended to be stable after 20 m for P. kesiya var. langbianensis (PK) and other upper trees (UPs) and after 10 m for the other lower trees (LTs). (2) The spatial autocorrelation of AGB and wood biomass was similar, while the bark biomass and foliage biomass were consistent. PK and other UPs also exhibited strong spatial autocorrelation, with maximum Moran’s I values of 0.1537 and 0.1644, respectively. (3) There was spatial heterogeneity in the different components except for the bark of PK. The lowest spatial heterogeneity was found for LT. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forestry Remote Sensing: Biomass, Changes and Ecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the clear-cutting plot. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) shows the location of the plot in Mujiang county for Pu’er City, Yunnan Province, and (<b>c</b>) is a satellite image of the study site (Red frame); (<b>d</b>) shows the numbering of trees in the sample plot before logging, and (<b>e</b>–<b>g</b>) the trees that were logged.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Location of the trees in the clear-cutting plot. PK is <span class="html-italic">Pinus kesiya</span> var. <span class="html-italic">langbianensis</span>, UP is the other trees at the upper layer, and LT is the other trees at the lower layer. The circle diameter is proportional to the tree DBH.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The intra-group variance of the different biomass components for different tree groups. (<b>a</b>): aboveground biomass, (<b>b</b>): wood biomass, (<b>c</b>): bark biomass, (<b>d</b>): foliage biomass, (<b>e</b>): branches biomass. PK is <span class="html-italic">Pinus kesiya</span> var. <span class="html-italic">langbianensis</span>, UP is the other trees at the upper layer, and LT is the other trees at the lower layer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Moran’s <span class="html-italic">I</span> correlogram and Z-score values for the biomass of the different components for all trees. (<b>a</b>): aboveground biomass, (<b>b</b>): wood biomass, (<b>c</b>): bark biomass, (<b>d</b>): foliage biomass, and (<b>e</b>): branches biomass. The dots and rectangles represent the points of Moran’s <span class="html-italic">I</span> and Z-score at the first peak (DFP) with a significant Z-score, and the values were shown in the figure, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Moran’s <span class="html-italic">I</span> correlogram and Z-score values for the biomass of the different components for <span class="html-italic">Pinus kesiya</span> var. <span class="html-italic">langbianensis</span>. (<b>a</b>): aboveground biomass, (<b>b</b>): wood biomass, (<b>c</b>): bark biomass, (<b>d</b>): foliage biomass, and (<b>e</b>): branches biomass. The dots and rectangles represent the points of Moran’s <span class="html-italic">I</span> and Z-score at the first peak (DFP) with a significant Z-score, and the values were shown in the figure, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Moran’s <span class="html-italic">I</span> correlogram and Z-score values for the biomass of the different components of other upper trees. (<b>a</b>): aboveground biomass, (<b>b</b>): wood biomass, (<b>c</b>): bark biomass, (<b>d</b>): foliage biomass, and (<b>e</b>): branches biomass. The dots and rectangles represent the points of Moran’s <span class="html-italic">I</span> and Z-score at the first peak (DFP) with a significant Z-score, and the values were shown in the figure, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Moran’s <span class="html-italic">I</span> correlogram and Z-score values for the biomass of the different components of other lower trees. (<b>a</b>): aboveground biomass, (<b>b</b>): wood biomass, (<b>c</b>): bark biomass, (<b>d</b>): foliage biomass, and (<b>e</b>): branches biomass. The dots and rectangles represent the points of Moran’s <span class="html-italic">I</span> and Z-score at the first peak (DFP) with a significant Z-score, and the values were shown in the figure, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial distribution of local Moran’s <span class="html-italic">I<sub>i</sub></span> for <span class="html-italic">Pinus kesiya</span> var. <span class="html-italic">langbianensis</span> (<b>a</b>) for aboveground biomass, (<b>b</b>) for wood biomass, (<b>c</b>) for bark biomass, (<b>d</b>) for foliage biomass, and (<b>e</b>) for branches biomass. NS is the point of no significant spatial autocorrelation, HH is the similar aggregation point with high-high clustering, HL is the dissimilarity aggregation point with a high-low outlier, and LH is the dissimilarity aggregation point with a low-high outlier.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Spatial distribution of local Moran’s <span class="html-italic">I<sub>i</sub></span> for other upper trees (<b>a</b>) for aboveground biomass, (<b>b</b>) wood biomass, (<b>c</b>) bark biomass, (<b>d</b>) foliage biomass, and (<b>e</b>) for branches biomass. NS is the point of no significant spatial autocorrelation, HH is the similar aggregation point with a high-high clustering, and HL is the dissimilarity aggregation point with a high-low outlier.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Spatial distribution of local Moran’s <span class="html-italic">I<sub>i</sub></span> for lower trees. The capital letters of the figure codes represent the different components (<b>a</b>) for aboveground biomass, (<b>b</b>) wood biomass, (<b>c</b>) bark biomass, (<b>d</b>) foliage biomass, and for (<b>e</b>) branches biomass. NS is the point of no significant spatial autocorrelation, and LH is the dissimilarity aggregation point with a low-high outlier.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 7331 KiB  
Article
Combination Strategies of Variables with Various Spatial Resolutions Derived from GF-2 Images for Mapping Forest Stock Volume
by Zhaohua Liu, Jiangping Long, Hui Lin, Xiaodong Xu, Hao Liu, Tingchen Zhang, Zilin Ye and Peisong Yang
Forests 2023, 14(6), 1175; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14061175 - 6 Jun 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1447
Abstract
Spectral features (SFs) and texture features (TFs) extracted from optical remote sensing images can capture the structural composition and growth information of forests, and combining remote sensing variables with a few ground measurement samples is a common method for mapping forest stock volume [...] Read more.
Spectral features (SFs) and texture features (TFs) extracted from optical remote sensing images can capture the structural composition and growth information of forests, and combining remote sensing variables with a few ground measurement samples is a common method for mapping forest stock volume (FSV). However, the accuracy of mapping FSV using optical images with a high spatial resolution (one meter or sub-meters) is often lower than medium resolutions (larger than 10 m) using the same types of features and approaches. To overcome the limitations of high spatial resolution images in mapping FSV, down-scaled images with spatial resolution ranging from 1 to 30 m were obtained by GF-2 image to interpret the relationships between spatial resolutions of features and the accuracy of mapping FSV, and combination strategies of variables with various spatial resolutions were proposed to improve the accuracy of mapping FSV. The results show that the spatial resolution of features significantly affects the performance of employed models in estimating FSV, the sensitivity between SFs and FSV gradually increases with the decreasing of spatial resolution, and the optimal spatial resolutions of two types of features (SFs and TFs) are not synchronized in mapping forest FSV. After using combination strategies of variables with various spatial resolutions, the accuracy of mapping FSV is significantly higher than those derived from variable sets with the same spatial resolutions. It is proved that TFs derived from GF-2 images have great potential to improve the accuracy of mapping FSV, and the contribution of features depends on the approaches of extracting and combination strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forestry Remote Sensing: Biomass, Changes and Ecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area and the map of ground measured samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The relationships between DBH, average height and FSV: (<b>a</b>) is the relationship between FSV and DBH, and (<b>b</b>) is the relationship between FSV and average height.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Down-sampled images with various spatial resolutions based on fused GF-2 images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flowchart of experiment methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Statistics results of each band with various spatial resolutions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Pearson correlation coefficients between spectral and TF with various resolutions (TFs are extracted from the blue band of GF-2, filter size: 9 × 9).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The Pearson correlation coefficients between features and FSV (TFs are from the blue band of GF-2).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The accuracy of mapped FSV using four models with different variable sets and spatial resolutions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Scatter plot of estimated and measured FSV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Scatter plot of estimated vs. measured FSV (GF-2, S2A and LC8).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Spatial distribution of FSV, (<b>a</b>) is from the combination of SFs with 10 m spatial resolution and TFs with 1 m spatial resolution, (<b>b</b>) is from the combination of SFs with 20 m spatial resolution and TFs with 1 m spatial resolution and (<b>c</b>) is from the combination of SFs with 30 m spatial resolution and TFs with 1 m spatial resolution, (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) are from S2A with 10 m and 20 m spatial resolution and LC8 with 30 m spatial resolution, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The results of FSV were estimated using RF models and variable sets from different data sources.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 3544 KiB  
Article
Estimation of Quercus Biomass in Shangri-La Based on GEDI Spaceborne Lidar Data
by Li Xu, Qingtai Shu, Huyan Fu, Wenwu Zhou, Shaolong Luo, Yingqun Gao, Jinge Yu, Chaosheng Guo, Zhengdao Yang, Jinnan Xiao and Shuwei Wang
Forests 2023, 14(5), 876; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14050876 - 24 Apr 2023
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2392
Abstract
Accurately estimating forest biomass based on spaceborne lidar on a county scale is challenging due to the incomplete coverage of spaceborne lidar data. Therefore, this research aims to interpolate GEDI spots and explore the feasibility of approaches to improving Quercus forest biomass estimation [...] Read more.
Accurately estimating forest biomass based on spaceborne lidar on a county scale is challenging due to the incomplete coverage of spaceborne lidar data. Therefore, this research aims to interpolate GEDI spots and explore the feasibility of approaches to improving Quercus forest biomass estimation accuracy in the alpine mountains of Yunnan Province, China. This paper uses GEDI data as the main information source and a typical mountainous area in Shangri-La, northwestern Yunnan Province, China, as the study area. Based on the pre-processing of light spots. A total of 38 parameters were extracted from the canopy and vertical profiles of 1307 light spots in the study area, and the polygon data of the whole study area were obtained from the light spot data through Kriging interpolation. Multiple linear regression, support vector regression, and random forest were used to establish biomass models. The results showed that the optimal model is selected using the semi-variance function for the Kriging interpolation of each parameter of GEDI spot, the optimal model of modis_nonvegetated is a linear model, and the optimal model for rv, sensitivity, and modis_treecover is the exponential model. Analysis of the correlation between 39 parameters extracted from GEDI L2B and three topographic factors with oak biomass showed that sensitivity had a highly significant positive correlation (p < 0.01) with Quercus biomass, followed by a significant negative correlation (p < 0.05) with aspect and modis_nonvegation. After variable selection, the estimation model of Quercus biomass established using random forest had R2 = 0.91, RMSE = 19.76 t/hm2, and the estimation accuracy was better than that of multiple linear regression and support vector regression. The estimated total biomass of Quercus in the study area was mainly distributed between 26.48 and 257.63 t/hm2, with an average value of 114.33 t/hm2 and a total biomass of about 1.26 × 107 t/hm2. This study obtained spatial consecutive information using Kriging interpolation. It provided a new research direction for estimating other forest structural parameters using GEDI data. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forestry Remote Sensing: Biomass, Changes and Ecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) is the location of Shangri-La in Yunnan Province; (<b>b</b>) is the distribution of Quercus and sample sites in Shangri-La.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>GEDI ground sampling mode.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Distribution of all light spots. (<b>b</b>) Distribution of light spots after filtering.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Technology roadmap.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Matrix of correlation coefficients between GEDI variables and Quercus biomass.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Scatterplot of measured biomass: (<b>a</b>) is the multiple linear regression; (<b>b</b>) is the support victor machine; (<b>c</b>) is the random forest.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Biomass distribution map of Quercus in Shangri-La.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 5302 KiB  
Article
Spatio-Temporal Variation and Climatic Driving Factors of Vegetation Coverage in the Yellow River Basin from 2001 to 2020 Based on kNDVI
by Xuejuan Feng, Jia Tian, Yingxuan Wang, Jingjing Wu, Jie Liu, Qian Ya and Zishuo Li
Forests 2023, 14(3), 620; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14030620 - 20 Mar 2023
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 4890
Abstract
The Yellow River Basin (YRB) is a fundamental ecological barrier in China and is one of the regions where the ecological environment is relatively fragile. Studying the spatio-temporal variations in vegetation coverage in the YRB and their driving factors through a long-time-series vegetation [...] Read more.
The Yellow River Basin (YRB) is a fundamental ecological barrier in China and is one of the regions where the ecological environment is relatively fragile. Studying the spatio-temporal variations in vegetation coverage in the YRB and their driving factors through a long-time-series vegetation dataset is of great significance to eco-environmental construction and sustainable development in the YRB. In this study, we sought to characterize the spatio-temporal variation in vegetation coverage and its climatic driving factors in the YRB from 2001 to 2020 by constructing a new kernel normalized difference vegetation index (kNDVI) dataset based on MOD13 A1 V6 data from the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform. Using Theil–Sen median trend analysis, the Mann–Kendall test, and the Hurst exponent, we investigated the spatio-temporal variation characteristics and future development trends of the vegetation coverage. The climatic driving factors of vegetation coverage in the YRB were obtained via partial correlation analysis and complex correlation analysis of the associations between kNDVI and both temperature and precipitation. The results reveal the following: The spatial distribution pattern of kNDVI in the YRB showed that vegetation coverage was high in the southeast and low in the northwest. Vegetation coverage fluctuated from 2001 to 2020, with a main significant trend of increasing growth at a rate of 0.0995/5a. The response of vegetation to climatic factors was strong in the YRB, with a stronger response to precipitation than to temperature. Additionally, the main driving factors of vegetation coverage in the YRB were found to be non-climatic factors, which were mainly distributed in Henan, southern Shaanxi, Shanxi, western Inner Mongolia, Ningxia, and eastern Gansu. The areas driven by climatic factors were mainly distributed in northern Shaanxi, Shandong, Qinghai, western Gansu, northeastern Inner Mongolia, and Sichuan. Our findings have implications for ecosystem restoration and sustainable development in the YRB. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forestry Remote Sensing: Biomass, Changes and Ecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The study area in the YRB: (<b>a</b>) location in China, (<b>b</b>) elevation, and (<b>c</b>) land-cover class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flow chart of the research.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Spatial distribution of the vegetation coverage: (<b>a</b>) spatial distribution of median <span class="html-italic">kNDVI</span> from 2001 to 2020 in the YRB and (<b>b</b>) the proportions of each classification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Temporal variation of median <span class="html-italic">kNDVI</span> in the YRB from 2001 to 2020. The left axis represents the <span class="html-italic">kNDVI</span> value of the box plot, and the right axis represents the median <span class="html-italic">kNDVI</span> value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Trends of inter-annual <span class="html-italic">kNDVI</span> change in the YRB from 2001 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial distribution of Hurst exponent and future trends in vegetation coverage: (<b>a</b>) spatial distribution of Hurst exponent and (<b>b</b>) spatial distribution of the <span class="html-italic">kNDVI</span> future development trends based on <span class="html-italic">kNDVI</span> trends and sustainability.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Trends and spatial distribution of temperature and precipitation in the YRB from 2001 to 2020: (<b>a</b>) trends of average temperature, (<b>b</b>) trends of total precipitation, (<b>c</b>) spatial distribution of temperature, and (<b>d</b>) spatial distribution of precipitation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial distribution of partial correlation coefficient and significance level between <span class="html-italic">kNDVI</span> and climatic factors: (<b>a</b>) partial correlation coefficient between <span class="html-italic">kNDVI</span> and temperature, (<b>b</b>) significance degree of partial correlation coefficient between <span class="html-italic">kNDVI</span> and temperature, (<b>c</b>) partial correlation coefficient between <span class="html-italic">kNDVI</span> and precipitation, and (<b>d</b>) significance degree of partial correlation coefficient between <span class="html-italic">kNDVI</span> and precipitation. R<sub>P·<span class="html-italic">kNDVI</span>-T</sub> refers to the partial correlation coefficient between <span class="html-italic">kNDVI</span> and temperature; R<sub>T·<span class="html-italic">kNDVI</span>-P</sub> refers to the partial correlation coefficient between <span class="html-italic">kNDVI</span> and precipitation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Analysis of driving factors of <span class="html-italic">kNDVI</span>: (<b>a</b>) spatial pattern of complex correlation coefficient between <span class="html-italic">kNDVI</span> and climate factors, (<b>b</b>) significance level of the complex correlation coefficient, and (<b>c</b>) driving factors of the <span class="html-italic">kNDVI</span> in the YRB from 2001 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 6956 KiB  
Article
Automatic Detection and Classification of Dead Nematode-Infested Pine Wood in Stages Based on YOLO v4 and GoogLeNet
by Xianhao Zhu, Ruirui Wang, Wei Shi, Qiang Yu, Xiuting Li and Xingwang Chen
Forests 2023, 14(3), 601; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14030601 - 17 Mar 2023
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2286
Abstract
Pine wood nematode disease has harmed forests in several countries, and can be reduced by locating and clearing infested pine trees from forests. The target detection model of deep learning was utilized to monitor a pine nematode-infested wood. The detecting effect was good, [...] Read more.
Pine wood nematode disease has harmed forests in several countries, and can be reduced by locating and clearing infested pine trees from forests. The target detection model of deep learning was utilized to monitor a pine nematode-infested wood. The detecting effect was good, but limited by low-resolution photos with poor accuracy and speed. Our work presents a staged detection and classification approach for a dead nematode-infested pine wood based using You Only Look Once version 4 (YOLO v4) and Google Inception version 1 Net (GoogLeNet), employing high-resolution images acquired by helicopter. Experiments showed that the detection accuracy of the staged detection and classification method and the method using only the YOLO v4 model were comparable for a dead nematode-infested pine wood when the amount of data was sufficient, but when the amount of data was limited the detection accuracy of the former was higher than that of the latter. The staged detection and classification method retained the fast training and detection speed of the one-stage target detection model, further improving the detection accuracy with limited data volume, and was more flexible in achieving accurate classification, meeting the needs of forest areas for pine nematode disease epidemic prevention and control. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forestry Remote Sensing: Biomass, Changes and Ecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographical location and image map of the study area. (<b>a</b>) Map of China with Jilin Province in green color; (<b>b</b>) map of Jilin Province with the Changbai Mountains in beige color and the study area in red color; (<b>c</b>) geographical location of the Baihe Conservation Management Station; (<b>d</b>) RGB image of the study area obtained by helicopter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Sample annotation schematic of the target detection model dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Technology roadmap.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>YOLO v4 model structure diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic diagram of inflation prediction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>NMS optimization effect comparison chart. (<b>a</b>) Before NMS (<b>b</b>) After NMS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>GoogLeNet model structure diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Inception v1 structure diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Performance comparison of object detection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>YOLO v4 and SSD detection accuracy comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of training loss of recognition classification models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of training accuracy of recognition classification models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>) YOLO v4 final detection effect. (<b>b</b>) Shapefile attribute representation intent. (<b>c</b>) Original image. (<b>d</b>) Shapefile overlaid with image data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Comparison of the detection accuracy of the staged detection classification method and dual-target detection classification method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Comparison of the classification accuracy of the staged detection classification method and dual-target detection classification method.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 13146 KiB  
Article
Damage Diagnosis of Pinus yunnanensis Canopies Attacked by Tomicus Using UAV Hyperspectral Images
by Yunqiang Ma, Junjia Lu and Xiao Huang
Forests 2023, 14(1), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14010061 - 28 Dec 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2064
Abstract
It remains challenging to control Tomicus spp., a pest with fast spreading capability, leading to the death of large numbers of Pinus yunnanensis (Franch.) and posing a severe threat to ecological security in southwest China. Therefore, it is crucial to effectively and accurately [...] Read more.
It remains challenging to control Tomicus spp., a pest with fast spreading capability, leading to the death of large numbers of Pinus yunnanensis (Franch.) and posing a severe threat to ecological security in southwest China. Therefore, it is crucial to effectively and accurately monitor the damage degree for Pinus yunnanensis attacked by Tomicus spp. at large geographical scales. Airborne hyperspectral remote sensing is an effective, accurate means to detect forest pests and diseases. In this study, we propose an innovative and precise classification framework to monitor the damage degree of Pinus yunnanensis infected by Tomicus spp. using hyperspectral UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) imagery with machine learning algorithms. First, we revealed the hyperspectral characteristics of Pinus yunnanensis from a UAV-based hyperspectral platform. We obtained 22 vegetation indices (VIs), 4 principal components, and 16 continuous wavelet transform (CWT) features as the damage degree sensitive features. We classified the damage degree of Pinus yunnanensis canopies infected by Tomicus spp. via three methods, i.e., discriminant analysis (DA), support vector machine (SVM), and backpropagation (BP) neural network. The results showed that the damage degree detected from the BP neural network, combined with 16 CWT features, achieved the best performance (training accuracy: 94.05%; validation accuracy: 94.44%). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forestry Remote Sensing: Biomass, Changes and Ecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Our study area is located in Yunnan, China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Example canopy photos.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>UAV hyperspectral imagery collection; (<b>a</b>) UAV on the ground; (<b>b</b>) Radiometric calibration; (<b>c</b>) The UAV in operation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Characteristic values, contribution rate, and the cumulative contribution rate of the top ten principal components.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Characteristics analysis and correlation analysis of CWT.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of accuracy of different features and discrimination methods—training samples (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>84</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of accuracy of different features and discrimination methods—validation samples (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>36</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Training accuracy of different classification algorithms (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 84).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Verification accuracy of different classification methods (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 36).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Spectral characteristics of damage degree in <span class="html-italic">Pinus yunnanensis</span> by <span class="html-italic">Tomicus</span> (Needle) (<b>a</b>) Spectral reflectance of <span class="html-italic">Pinus yunnanensis</span> (Needle) with different damage degree; (<b>b</b>) the first derivative value of <span class="html-italic">Pinus yunnanensis</span> needles with different damage degree).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Correlation coefficient comparison between spectral reflectance and the first derivative of <span class="html-italic">Pinus yunnanensis</span> with different damage degrees by <span class="html-italic">Tomicus</span> (Needle) (<b>a</b>). The correlation coefficient between spectral reflectance and different damage degree of <span class="html-italic">Pinus yunnanensis</span> needles; (<b>b</b>). The correlation coefficient between the different damage degrees of <span class="html-italic">Pinus yunnanensis</span> needles and the first derivative of <span class="html-italic">Pinus yunnanensis</span> needles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of sensitive bands of spectral reflectance and the first derivative of <span class="html-italic">Pinus yunnanensis</span> with different damage degrees by <span class="html-italic">Tomicus</span> (Needle). (<b>a</b>) Spectral reflectance of the needle; (<b>b</b>) Spectral first derivative of the needle.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Spectral reflectance curves of different damage degree <span class="html-italic">Pinus yunnanensis</span> canopy by Tomicus. (<b>a</b>). the original curve, (<b>b</b>). the reflectance average curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>The first derivative curves of different damage degree <span class="html-italic">Pinus yunnanensis</span> canopy by Tomicus. (<b>a</b>). the first derivative curves of the canopy spectra; (<b>b</b>). the first derivative average curves of the canopy spectra.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Correlation analysis between different damage degrees by Tomicus and the spectral parameter of <span class="html-italic">Pinus yunnanensis</span> canopy ((<b>a</b>). the spectral reflectance (<b>b</b>). the first derivative of spectra).</p>
Full article ">Figure A4
<p>Sensitive bands of spectral reflectance and the first derivative with the damage degrees by <span class="html-italic">Tomicus</span> in <span class="html-italic">Pinus yunnanensis</span> canopy ((<b>a</b>) Spectral reflectance of 120 samples; (<b>b</b>) Mean spectral reflectance; (<b>c</b>) Spectral first derivative curves of 120 samples; (<b>d</b>) Mean spectral first derivative).</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 8356 KiB  
Article
Estimate Forest Aboveground Biomass of Mountain by ICESat-2/ATLAS Data Interacting Cokriging
by Hanyue Song, Lei Xi, Qingtai Shu, Zhiyue Wei and Shuang Qiu
Forests 2023, 14(1), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14010013 - 21 Dec 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2424
Abstract
Compared with the previous full-waveform data, the new generation of ICESat-2/ATLAS (Advanced Terrain Laser Altimeter System) has a larger footprint overlap density and a smaller footprint area. This study used ATLAS data to estimate forest aboveground biomass (AGB) in a high-altitude, ecologically fragile [...] Read more.
Compared with the previous full-waveform data, the new generation of ICESat-2/ATLAS (Advanced Terrain Laser Altimeter System) has a larger footprint overlap density and a smaller footprint area. This study used ATLAS data to estimate forest aboveground biomass (AGB) in a high-altitude, ecologically fragile area. The paper used ATLAS data as the main information source and a typical mountainous area in Shangri-La, northwestern Yunnan Province, China, as the study area. Then, we combined biomass data from 54 ground samples to obtain the estimated AGB of 74,873 footprints using a hyperparametric optimized random forest (RF) model. The total AGB was estimated by combining the best variance function model in geostatistics with the slope that is the covariates. The results showed that among the 50 index parameters and three topographic variables extracted based on ATLAS, six variables showed a significant correlation with AGB. They were, in order, number of canopy photons, Landsat percentage canopy, canopy photon rate, slope, number of photons, and apparent surface reflectance. The optimized random forest model was used to estimate the AGB within the footprints. The model accuracy was the coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.93, the root mean square error (RMSE) = 10.13 t/hm2, and the population estimation accuracy was 83.3%. The optimized model has a good estimation effect and can be used for footprint AGB estimation. The spatial structure analysis of the variance function of footprint AGB showed that the spherical model had the largest fitting accuracy (R2 = 0.65, the residual sum of squares (RSS) = 2.65 × 10−4), the nugget (C0) was 0.21, and the spatial structure ratio was 94.0%. It showed that the AGB of footprints had strong spatial correlation and could be interpolated by kriging. Finally, the slope in the topographic variables was selected as the co-interpolation variable, and cokriging spatial interpolation was performed. Furthermore, a continuous map of AGB spatial distribution was obtained, and the total AGB was 6.07 × 107 t. The spatial distribution of AGB showed the same trend as the distribution of forest stock. The absolute accuracy of the estimation was 82.6%, using the statistical value of the forest resource planning and design survey as a reference. The ATLAS data can improve the accuracy of AGB estimation in mountain forests. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forestry Remote Sensing: Biomass, Changes and Ecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area and the sample circles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Statistics forest land change data in 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Slope, aspect, and elevation maps of the study area. (<b>a</b>) Slope; (<b>b</b>) aspect; (<b>c</b>) elevation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Technology roadmap.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic diagram of effective footprints in the study area. (<b>a</b>) Forest footprints. (<b>b</b>) Nonforest footprints.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Correlation between 6 parameters and footprint AGB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Optimized random forest AGB model-fitting accuracy map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial distribution of AGB of ICESat-2 footprints and forest stock in 2021. (<b>a</b>) Footprints AGB. (<b>b</b>) Forest stock in 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Variable distribution map. (<b>a</b>) AGB. (<b>b</b>) Slope.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Interpolation accuracy validation scatter plots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Spatial distribution of AGB in the study area. (<b>a</b>) Predicted results. (<b>b</b>) Standard error prediction. (<b>c</b>) Standard error of overlapping footprint prediction results.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 3497 KiB  
Article
Optimizing Spectral Libraries from Landsat Imagery for the Analysis of Habitat Richness Using MESMA
by Leyre Compains Iso, Alfonso Fernández-Manso and Víctor Fernández-García
Forests 2022, 13(11), 1824; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13111824 - 2 Nov 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1645
Abstract
Spectral mixture analysis of satellite images, such as MESMA (multiple endmember spectral mixtures analysis), can be used to obtain fraction images in which the abundance of each land occupation class is represented at the pixel level, which is crucial for the analysis of [...] Read more.
Spectral mixture analysis of satellite images, such as MESMA (multiple endmember spectral mixtures analysis), can be used to obtain fraction images in which the abundance of each land occupation class is represented at the pixel level, which is crucial for the analysis of heterogeneous landscapes in which types of habitats vary at fine spatial scales. The objective of this work is to analyze the influence of spectral libraries of various characteristics on the performance of MESMA. To this end, eight spectral libraries from Landsat satellite images were elaborated with different characteristics in terms of size, composition, and temporality. The spectral libraries were optimized using the iterative selection of endmembers (IES) method with the MESMA technique to obtain the fraction images considering five habitat classes (forest, shrubland, grassland, water, and rock and bare soil). The application of MESMA resulted in the classification of more than 95% of pixels in all cases with a root mean square error (RMSE) less than or equal to 0.025. Validation of the fraction images through linear regressions resulted in an RMSE ≥ 0.35 for the shrubland and grassland classes, with a lower RMSE for the remaining classes. A significant influence of library size was observed, as well as a significant effect of temporality, with the best results obtained for the largest monotemporal libraries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forestry Remote Sensing: Biomass, Changes and Ecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area in the Cantabrian Mountains, northwest of the Iberian Peninsula (the top-left panel shows the regional boundaries of Spain).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Habitat types identified in study area: shrubland (S), forest (F), grassland (G), water (W), and rock and bare soil (R).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Methodology flow chart. WMS: web map service; CNIG: National Geographic Information Centre; ITACyL: Agricultural Technological Institute of Castile and Leon; IES: iterative endmember selection; MESMA: multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis; RMSE: root mean square error.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Distribution of the 50 plots that represent five habitat types in the study area: forest (F), shrubland (S), grassland (G), rock and bare soil (R), and water (W).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Procedure for obtaining reference fractions from the sample of the 30 × 30 m plots for validation. By assigning an identifier to each entity, the fractions of each type of existing habitat were visually identified.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spectral signatures included in the optimized libraries (L1_IES, L2_IES, L3_IES, L4_IES, 1990_IES, 2000_IES, 2010_IES, and 2020_IES) obtained after IES analysis (water: 3 endmembers; forest: 9 endmembers; shrubland: 48 endmembers; grassland: 31 endmembers; rock and bare soil: 16 endmembers).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The panel on the left shows the mean predicted RMSE values (±95% confidence intervals) depending on library size: the abscissa axis reflects the number of spectral signatures as the size of the spectral library, and the ordinate axis represents the predicted RMSE value. The panel on the right shows the mean predicted RMSE values (±95% confidence intervals) depending on library type: the abscissa axis reflects the type of spectral library (monotemporal, multitemporal with equitable distribution (Multitemporal_DE), or multitemporal with inequitable distribution (Multitemporal_DNE)).</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Distribution of validation plots in the study area.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop