Compromise Parameters of Temperature, Light, and Noise in Confined Spaces on Work Duration and Number of Errors †
<p>Data processing.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>(<b>i</b>) Laboratory equipment, (<b>ii</b>) Simulation condition.</p> "> Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Interaction plots for work duration (male), and (<b>b</b>) interaction plots for number of error (female).</p> ">
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sepehri, S.; Aliabadi, M.; Golmohammadi, R.; Babamiri, M. The effects of noise on human cognitive performance and thermal perception under different air temperatures. J. Res. Health Sci. 2019, 19, e00464. [Google Scholar]
- Chao, P.C.; Juang, Y.J.; Chen, C.J.; Dai, Y.T.; Yeh, C.Y.; Hu, C.Y. Combined effects of noise, vibration, and low temperature on the physiological parameters of labor employees. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2013, 29, 560–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Budie, B.; Appel-Meulenbroek, R.; Kemperman, A.; Weijs-Perree, M. Employee satisfaction with the physical work environment: The importance of a need based approach. Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag. 2019, 23, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perkasa, D.H.; Susiang, M.I.N.; Parashakti, R.D.; Rostina, C.N. The Influence of the Physical Work Environment, Work Motivation, and Work Discipline on Employee Performance. KnE Soc. Sci. 2023, 2023, 286–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harry, J. Stress management and employee performance. Eur. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. Stud. 2020, 4, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aisyah, S.; Deswindi, L.; Indrajaya, D. Are Physical and Non-Physical Working Environment Effect Employees Productivity with Motivation as an Intervening Factor? Adv. Econ. Bus. Manag. Res. 2020, 149, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alam, S. The Role of Physical Work Environment and Work Stress in Affecting Employee Performance. Int. J. Multicult. Multireligious Underst. 2020, 7, 529–535. [Google Scholar]
- Iis, E.Y.; Wahyuddin, W.; Thoyib, A.; Ilham, R.N.; Sinta, I. the Effect of Career Development and Work Environment on Employee Performance With Work Motivation As Intervening Variable At the Office of Agriculture and Livestock in Aceh. Int. J. Econ. Bus. Account. Agric. Manag. Sharia Adm. 2022, 2, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sigalingging, H.; Pakpahan, M.E. the Effect of Training and Work Environtment on Employee Performance With Motivation As an Intervening Variable At P.T Intraco Agroindustry. South East Asia J. Contemp. Bus. Econ. Law 2021, 24, 130–139. [Google Scholar]
- Nucki, P. Analysis of physical and non-physical work environment pt. kakiatna indonesi to company performance. J. Econ. Bus. UniSadhuGuna Bus. Sch. 2019, 8, 73–81. [Google Scholar]
- Harini, S.; Sudarijati, S.; Yani, M.A. Occupational Health Safety and Physical Work Environment Conditions on Employee Performance. Indones. J. Soc. Res. 2019, 1, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nardo, R.; Evanita, S.; Syahrizal, S. The Effect of Transformational Leadership and Non Physical Work Environment on Innovative Behavior with Work Motivation as a Mediation For Employees of Tour And Travel Companies In West Sumatera. Adv. Econ. Bus. Manag. Res. 2019, 64, 1052–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurniawati, A.T.; Putu, N.; Paramananda, P.N.; Istri, K.G.D.A.A. The Effect of Communication, Work Motivation and Physical Work Environment on Employee Work Spirit at Puri Sukawati Tourism Destination. J. Econ. Financ. Manag. Stud. 2023, 6, 1596–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sari, T.A.; Indartono, S. The Influence of Emotional Intelligence and Perception of Leadership Effectiveness Toward Perception Team Performance. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Ethics of Business, Economics and Social Science, Jakarta, Indonesia, 28–29 June 2017; pp. 149–156. [Google Scholar]
- López-Cabarcos, M.Á.; Vázquez-Rodríguez, P.; Quiñoá-Piñeiro, L.M. An approach to employees’ job performance through work environmental variables and leadership behaviours. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 140, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamidi, N.N.E.B.; Mansor, F.A.; Hashim, M.Z.; Muhammad, N.; Azib, W.N.H.W. The Relationship Between Physical Workplace Environment and Employees’ Performance. J. Contemp. Soc. Sci. Res. 2020, 4, 128–2697. [Google Scholar]
- Rosyidah, M.; Oktarini, D.; Madagaskar; Azhari. Optimalization Physical Environment Effects on Work Productivity for Assembly Operator with Response Surface Methodology. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1198, 042004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samuel, O.O. Effect Of the Physical Work Environtment On Employees Performance in selected Manufacturing Firms in Nigeria. Gusau J. Bus. Adm. 2022, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Taheri, R.H.; Miah, M.S.; Kamaruzzaman, M. Impact of Working Environment on Job Satisfaction of Employees. EPRA Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. 2020, 5, 403–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ansori, N.; Widyanti, A. The Role of Safety Silence Motives to Safety Communication and Safety Participation in Different Sectors of Small and Medium Enterprises Investigation Results on Two Kinds of Industries in Indonesia. Saf. Health Work 2021, 12, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hinkle, J.T.; Pontone, G.M.; Program, S.T.; Sciences, B. Psychomotor processing and functional decline in Parkinson’s disease predicted by the Purdue Pegboard test. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2022, 36, 909–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nasution, R.H. Analisis Pengaruh Temperatur dan Kebisingan Terhadap Kerja Sistem Cardiovascular di CV. Bintang Terang Medan. J. Surya Tek. 2017, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahmayanti, D.; Artha, A. Analisis Bahaya Fisik: Hubungan Tingkat Pencahayaan dan Keluhan Mata Pekerja pada Area Perkantoran Health, Safety, and Environmental (HSE) PT. Pertamina RU VI Balongan. J. Optimasi Sist. Ind. 2016, 14, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riadyani, A.P.; Herbawani, C.K. Systematic Review Pengaruh Intensitas Cahaya Terhadap Kelelahan Mata Pekerja. J. Kesehat. Masy. 2022, 10, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sigirtmac, I.C.; Oksuz, C. Determination of the optimal cutoff values and validity of the Purdue Pegboard Test. Br. J. Occup. Ther. 2022, 85, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahlqvist, O. Reliability and Validity. Int. Encycl. Hum. Geogr. 2009, 1-12, V9-320–V9-323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mariyono, J.; Kuntaniringsih, A.; Suswati, E. Ketimpangan Jender Dalam Akses Pelayanan Kesehatan Rumah Tangga Petani Pedesaan: Kasus Dua Desa Di Kabupaten Tegal, Jawa Tengah. SOCA Socioecon. Agric. Agribus. 2008, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Novi, N.; Darmawan, A.; Pattipawaej, O.C. Analisis Pengaruh Getaran Terhadap Konsentrasi Pekerja. 2016. Available online: https://jurnal.umj.ac.id/index.php/semnastek/article/view/746 (accessed on 22 January 2025).
- Marlius, D.; Sholihat, I. Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Fisik Dan Non Fisik Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Dinas Kearsipan Dan Perpustakaan Provinsi Sumatera Barat. J. Bina Bangsa Ekon. 2022, 15, 703–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rastana, I.; Mahayasa, I.; Permayani, N. Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Fisik dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Badan Keuangan Daerah di Kabupaten Tabanan. J. Manaj. Kewirausahaan Dan Pariwisata 2021, 1, 834–843. [Google Scholar]
- Berger, M.A.M.; Krul, A.J.; Daanen, H.A.M. Task specificity of finger dexterity tests. Appl. Ergon. 2009, 40, 145–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelson, J.B.; Mital, A. An ergonomic evaluation of dexterity and tactility with increase in examination/surgical glove thickness. Ergonomics 1995, 38, 723–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waters, R.L.; Sie, I.H.; Gellman, H.; Tognella, M. Functional hand surgery following tetraplegia. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1996, 77, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byrd, A.P.; Stone, R.T.; Anderson, R.G. Dexterity: An Indicator of Future Performance in Beginning Weledrs. Career Tech. Educ. Res. 2018, 43, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tseng, Y.C.; Chang, K.Y.; Liu, P.L.; Chang, C.C. Applying the purdue pegboard to evaluate precision assembly performance. IEEE Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Eng. Manag. 2017, 2017, 1179–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chien, S.Y.; Wong, A.M.K.; Wu, C.Y.; Beckman, S.L. Interactive Electronic Pegboard for Enhancing Manual Dexterity and Cognitive Abilities: Instrument Usability Study. JMIR Hum. Factors 2024, 11, e56357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Description | df | p-Value |
---|---|---|
Work duration of male operators | 32 | 0.731 |
Work duration of female operators | 32 | 0.342 |
Number of errors by male operators | 32 | 0.271 |
Number of errors by female operators | 32 | 0.318 |
Response | t-Test (2-Tailed) |
---|---|
Work duration | 0.000 ** |
Number of errors | 0.181 |
Factor | Male | Female | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F Value | Decision | Variance | F Value | Decision | Variance | |
Temperature | 2.83 | Accept H0 | No | 11.87 ** | Reject H0 | Yes |
Light | 8.12 ** | Reject H0 | Yes | 1.89 | Accept H0 | No |
Noise | 46.57 ** | Reject H0 | Yes | 97.95 ** | Reject H0 | Yes |
Temperature and light | 4.29 * | Reject H0 | Yes | 0.14 | Accept H0 | No |
Temperature and noise | 0.66 | Accept H0 | No | 0.47 | Accept H0 | No |
Light and noise | 0.32 | Accept H0 | No | 2.29 | Accept H0 | No |
Temperature, light, and noise | 0.04 | Accept H0 | No | 0.21 | Accept H0 | No |
R2 = 0.85 | R2 = 0.91 |
Grouping Information Using the Fisher LSD Method and 95% Confidence | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male | Female | ||||||
Light | Temperature | ||||||
(lx) | N | Mean | Grouping | (°C) | N | Mean | Grouping |
750 | 16 | 216.38 | A | 24 | 16 | 197.67 | A |
200 | 16 | 207.23 | A | 30 | 16 | 188.52 | A |
Noise | Noise | ||||||
(dB) | N | Mean | Grouping | (dB) | N | Mean | Grouping |
90 | 16 | 222.75 | A | 90 | 16 | 206.23 | A |
80 | 16 | 200.85 | B | 80 | 16 | 179.96 | B |
Factor | Male | Female | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F Value | Decision | Variance | F Value | Decision | Variance | |
Temperature | 0.01 | Accept H0 | No | 0.08 | Accept H0 | No |
Light | 0.52 | Accept H0 | No | 0.98 | Accept H0 | No |
Noise | 0.17 | Accept H0 | No | 0.70 | Accept H0 | No |
Temperature and light | 1.29 | Accept H0 | No | 0.00 | Accept H0 | No |
Temperature and noise | 0.00 | Accept H0 | No | 1.58 | Accept H0 | No |
Light and noise | 3.46 | Accept H0 | No | 0.31 | Accept H0 | No |
Temperature, light, and noise | 0.00 | Accept H0 | No | 0.02 * | Reject H0 | Yes |
t-Test | Duration | Error | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Male | Female | Male | Female | |
Yes | No | |||
ANOVA | Male | Female | Male | Female |
Temperature (°C) | No | Yes | No | No |
Lighting (lx) | Yes | No | No | No |
Noise (dB) | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Temperature (°C) * Lighting (lx) | Yes | No | No | No |
Temperature (°C) * Noise (dB) | No | No | No | No |
Lighting (lx) * Noise (dB) | No | No | No | No |
Temperature (°C) * Lighting (lx) * Noise (dB) | No | No | No | Yes |
POST-HOC TEST | Noise | Noise | - | - |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ansori, N.; Pratama, F.R.A.; Agustina, F.; Utami, I.D.; Widiaswanti, E.; Annisa, R. Compromise Parameters of Temperature, Light, and Noise in Confined Spaces on Work Duration and Number of Errors. Eng. Proc. 2025, 84, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025084004
Ansori N, Pratama FRA, Agustina F, Utami ID, Widiaswanti E, Annisa R. Compromise Parameters of Temperature, Light, and Noise in Confined Spaces on Work Duration and Number of Errors. Engineering Proceedings. 2025; 84(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025084004
Chicago/Turabian StyleAnsori, Nachnul, Fito Rolis Agung Pratama, Fitri Agustina, Issa Dyah Utami, Ernaning Widiaswanti, and Rullie Annisa. 2025. "Compromise Parameters of Temperature, Light, and Noise in Confined Spaces on Work Duration and Number of Errors" Engineering Proceedings 84, no. 1: 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025084004
APA StyleAnsori, N., Pratama, F. R. A., Agustina, F., Utami, I. D., Widiaswanti, E., & Annisa, R. (2025). Compromise Parameters of Temperature, Light, and Noise in Confined Spaces on Work Duration and Number of Errors. Engineering Proceedings, 84(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025084004