32-52
That makes seven. Two more losses to the ChiSox - who'll throw Buehrle and Garcia at us over the final games of the series - will make three consecutive sweeps. Could there be a more fitting way to conclude the first half of the season?
Scouting is a funny thing. Everyone reading this has, at one point or another, thought themselves to be reasonable judges of talent. We've all offered amateur scouting reports on certain players and tried to sound professional in doing so, but more often than not we fall into the usual trap. Consider these two hypothetical reports:
One: Pinpoint command of all of his pitches. Knows how to pitch, and doesn't leave anything on the field. Intense. Not afraid to go inside at any point in the count. Fools hitters and makes them miss with ease. Big kid who will add velocity as he fills out.
Two: Good velocity on his pitches. Mixed in three different pitches - fastball, curveball, changeup - and had good movement on each of them. Has fluid, consistent mechanics, and has the same delivery, arm speed, and release point on all of his pitches. Changeup sinks down and away from right-handed hitters. Very quick off the mound in defensive situations.
Which of the two has more merit? They both have good things to say about the pitcher, after all. The first scouting report, however, is problematic, in that it cites a number of attributes that cannot be confirmed by watching a single game. Perhaps the pitcher is actually pretty wild, but was feeling good on this particular day and managed to hit his spots. Perhaps he was really
missing his spots, and just throwing pitches to the strike zone in general - the inside pitches may have been outside fastballs with poor location. Maybe the other team has really bad hitters who don't make consistent contact. And how can you determine whether or not a player is "intense"? It's possible that the pitcher had a rough day and was very angry at the time of the game.
What a scouting report should do is make note of the things that won't change from game to game. Velocity. Delivery. Repertoire. Pitch movement. If a guy is throw a 90mph fastball one day, he's going to be throwing 90mph in the next game, as well. Similarly, offspeed pitches don't just disappear between starts. These are "permanent" attributes that an organization can use to determine whether or not the pitcher is worth signing. If he has smooth mechanics and a consistent release point, chances are he's going to have pretty good control. If you combine a fluid delivery with good velocity, he's probably going to strike out a bunch of hitters. It isn't the scout's job to form hypotheses based on anecdotal evidence and a one-game sample size. Rather, he's just supposed to make note of the things that aren't likely to change any time soon.
...which brings us to Justin Leone. He's started two games with the big league club and has collected just a handful of at bats - a pretty good approximation of how much a visiting scout would see before moving on to the next prospect. So, why not try and create a little scouting report, based on what we've seen? Remember, only consider Leone's
permanent abilities, rather than wasting ink by noting that he made an error on a routine groundball.
Good speed. Footspeed stays with a guy until he retires (for the most part), and Leone flashed some quick legs by beating out two infield singles and easily stealing a base last night.
Good power. Leone nearly hit home runs in consecutive games, and smashed a grounder to the hole yesterday. (Confirmed by looking at his minor league track record.)
Very selective hitter. Leone doesn't like to swing early in the count unless he gets a fastball over the plate. He watches a lot of borderline pitches go by because he can't drive them as well as pitches down the middle (this can be confused with having a good batter's eye). From this, the organization could, for example, infer that Leone will be vulnerable to called third strikes that catch the corners of the strike zone, and that he won't be very good at protecting the plate when he's behind in the count.
Reads the ball well. Leone hasn't shown a propensity to lunge at offspeed pitches. He stays back and puts the weight on his back foot until the pitch crosses the plate. Rather than pointing out that he may or may not have fanned on a curveball, it would be more prudent to mention that he has the right
approach to breaking pitches, which means that he's more likely to start hitting them in the future.
Poor footwork in the field. Although he's quick, Leone doesn't set his feet very well when he's making a play, which results in inaccurate throws and a handful of errors. Although Olerud made a fine scoop yesterday, it was still a bad throw by Leone that could have gone into foul territory for an error.
Strong arm. Although it was off-target (due to bad footwork), Leone made a strong throw from his back foot to first base to get an out. The organization could then infer that Leone has the arm strength to play the hot corner, and just needs to work on setting up properly before making a play.
There's your scouting report. None of the attributes mentioned are likely to change on a game-to-game basis, creating an accurate image of the player from which a given team may extrapolate further information and determine whether or not Leone's faults 1) can be remedied, and 2) are outweighed by his positive qualities. It's a simple process, but one that is often screwed up by people who try to learn everything about a player in one or two at bats.
The game itself was a yawner, and I shut it off when Melvin pinch-hit Hansen for Leone int he seventh (seriously, with the season well out of hand, was that move really necessary?). Randy Winn increased his trade value with a solo shot in the eighth, while Jolbert Cabrera did some yardwork of his own, causing Ken "Hawk" Harrelson to suggest that Cabrera may be the most valuable Mariner this season. When a guy is making outs in 70% of his plate appearances, and he's being mentioned as a valuable player, you know that
something is awry, either with the announcer, the team in question, or both.
Is it just me, or does it feel like Willie Bloomquist is hardly part of this team anymore? But then I look at the game log and realize that he's appearing in the majority of our games, and it just sends me hurtling back down to Earth...
Jeff Cirillo, circa 2002:
.249/.301/.328
Rich Aurilia, circa 2004:
.240/.304/.337
Cirillo also had a pretty decent June that year. Hmmm...
Nobody in the Major Leagues has a more inconsistent release point than Joel Pineiro right now. He's bouncing curveballs and beaning terrible veteran catchers with sidearm sliders far more often than you'd like, and one can only hope that the All Star break gives him the opportunity to work things out with Price. Combining an erratic delivery with a tendency to overthrow, and you've got the makings of an elbow blowout.
Thornton goes against Buehrle tomorrow at 4:05 PST. The White Sox are fourth in the AL in walks drawn, but Frank Thomas' absence will make things a little easier for the kid in his first ML start. Not that I think he'll last five innings.