dbo:abstract
|
- Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1 (1978), is a United States Supreme Court decision that clarified both the scope of the protection against double jeopardy provided by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the limits of an appellate court's discretion to fashion a remedy under section 2106 of Title 28 to the United States Code. It established the constitutional rule that where an appellate court reverses a criminal conviction on the ground that the prosecution failed to present sufficient evidence to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the Double Jeopardy Clause shields the defendant from a second prosecution for the same offense. Notwithstanding the power that appellate courts have under section 2106 to "remand the cause and direct the entry of such appropriate judgment, decree, or order, or require such further proceedings to be had as may be just under the circumstances," a court that reverses a conviction for insufficiency of the evidence may not allow the lower court a choice on remand between acquitting the defendant and ordering a new trial. The "only 'just' remedy" in this situation, the Court held, is to order an acquittal. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 25022 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-11-28 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
|
- Burks v. United States, (en)
|
dbp:courtlistener
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-14 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:findlaw
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- David Wayne Burks, Petitioner, v. United States (en)
|
dbp:googlescholar
| |
dbp:holding
|
- The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment precludes a second trial once the reviewing court has found the evidence insufficient to sustain the jury's verdict of guilty. (en)
|
dbp:joinmajority
|
- Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall, Powell, Rehnquist, and Stevens (en)
|
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:lawsapplied
| |
dbp:litigants
|
- Burks v. United States (en)
|
dbp:loc
| |
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:notparticipating
| |
dbp:opinionannouncement
| |
dbp:oralargument
| |
dbp:oyez
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:prior
| |
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dct:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1 (1978), is a United States Supreme Court decision that clarified both the scope of the protection against double jeopardy provided by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the limits of an appellate court's discretion to fashion a remedy under section 2106 of Title 28 to the United States Code. It established the constitutional rule that where an appellate court reverses a criminal conviction on the ground that the prosecution failed to present sufficient evidence to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the Double Jeopardy Clause shields the defendant from a second prosecution for the same offense. Notwithstanding the power that appellate courts have under section 2106 to "remand the cause and direct the entry of such (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- Burks v. United States (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- David Wayne Burks, Petitioner, v. United States (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |