[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
create a website
Testing the knowledge-capital model of foreign direct investment: New evidence. (2022). , Henk ; Henk, .
In: MPRA Paper.
RePEc:pra:mprapa:114177.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 4

Citations received by this document

Cites: 80

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. A micro-macro model of foreign direct investment: Knowledge-based gravity forces, self-selection and third-country effects. (2022). , Henk ; Henk, .
    In: EconStor Preprints.
    RePEc:zbw:esprep:266494.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. A micro-macro model of foreign direct investment: knowledge-based gravity forces, self-selection and third-country effects. (2022). Kox, Henk.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:115542.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Explaining foreign direct investment patterns: a testable micro-macro gravity model for FDI. (2022). , Henk ; Henk, .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:115273.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Agrawal, A., and R. Henderson (2002), Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT, Management Science, 48 (1), 44-60.

  2. Agresti, A. (2010), Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data (Second ed.), John Wiley & Sons, New York.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  3. Aitken, B., A. Harrison and R. Lipsey (1996), Wages and foreign ownership: A comparative study of Mexico, Venezuela, and the United States, Journal of International Economics, 40, 345-371.

  4. Alcacer, J. and M. Gittelman (2006), Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations, Review of Economics and Statistics, 88 (4), 774–779.

  5. Ali, A. and L. Hwang (2000), Country-specific factors related to financial reporting and the value relevance of accounting data, Journal of Accounting Research, 38 (1), 1-21.

  6. Anderson, J., M. Larch and Y. Yotov (2019), Trade and investment in the global economy: A multi-country dynamic analysis, European Economic Review, 120 (November), 103311.

  7. Arora, A. and A. Gambardella (2005), The globalization of the software industry: perspectives and opportunities for developed and developing countries, Innovation Policy and the Economy, 5, 1-32.

  8. Arora, A., S. Belenzon, and L. Sheer (2021), Knowledge spillovers and corporate investment in scientific research, American Economic Review, 111 (3), 1–28.

  9. Arundel, A., N. Es-Sadki, F. Barjak, P. Perrett, O. Samuel, and S. Lilischkis (2013), Knowledge transfer study 2010–2012—Final Report, European Commission, Brussels.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Atkin, D., M. Chen, and A. Popov (2022), The returns to face-to-face interactions: Knowledge spillovers in Silicon Valley, NBER WP #30147 , NBER, Cambridge MA.

  11. Audretsch, D., and P. Stephan (1999), Knowledge spillovers in biotechnology: Sources and incentives, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9 (1), 97–107.

  12. Audretsch, D., and P. Stephan (1996), Company scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology, American Economic Review, 86 (3), 641–652.

  13. Battisti, M., F. Belloc and M. Gatto (2021), Is the productivity premium of internationalized firms technology-driven?, Empirical Economics, 60 (6), 3069-3102.

  14. Beer, S., R. De Mooij, and L. Liu (2020), International corporate tax avoidance: A review of the channels, magnitudes, and blind spots, Journal of Economic Surveys 34, 660–688.

  15. Benhabib, J., J. Perla, and C. Tonetti (2021), Reconciling models of diffusion and innovation: A theory of the productivity distribution and technology frontier, Econometrica, 89 (5), 2261-2301.

  16. Bernard, A., J. Jensen, and P. Schott (2013), Importers, exporters, and multinationals, in: T. Dunne, J. Jensen and M. Roberts (eds), A portrait of firms in the U.S. that trade goods: Producer Dynamics: New Evidence from Micro Data, Chicago Scholarship Online (DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226172576.001.0001).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  17. Bernard, A., J. Jensen, S. Redding, and P. Schott (2007), Firms in international trade, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21 (3), 105-130.

  18. Blonigen, B., and J. Piger (2014), Determinants of foreign direct investment, Canadian Journal of Economics, 47 (3), 775-812.

  19. Blonigen, B., R. Davies and K. Head (2002), Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise: Comment, NBER WP #8929, NBER, Cambridge MA.

  20. Boyle, J. (2003a), Enclosing the genome: What the squabbles over genetic patents could teach us, in: F. Scott Kief, ed., Perspectives and properties of the human genome project, Elsevier Academic, 97-118.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Boyle, J. (2003b), The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain, Law & Contemporary Problems , 66, 33-74.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  22. Braconier, H., P. Norback and D. Urban (2005), Reconciling the evidence on the knowledge capital model, Review of International Economics, 13, 770-786.

  23. Breschi, S., and C. Catalini (2010), Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists’ and inventors’ networks, Research Policy, 39 (1), 14–26.

  24. Calderini, M., C. Franzoni, and A. Vezzulli (2007), If star scientists do not patent: The effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world, Research Policy, 36 (3), 303–319.

  25. Cantwell. J. (2009), Location and the multinational enterprise, Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (1), 35-41.

  26. Carlsson, B., and A. Fridh (2002), Technology transfer in United States universities, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12, 199–232.

  27. Carr, D., J. Markusen, and K. Maskus (2001), Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise, American Economic Review, 91 (3), 693-708.

  28. Chan, E. and B. Cheung (2022), Readiness of intellectual capital measurement: A review of the property development and investment industry, International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering 16 (3), 82-88.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  29. Chellaraj, G. and A. Mattoo (2009), Can the knowledge-capital model explain sectoral foreign investment? Evidence from Singapore, East-West Center Economics Series WP #101, Honolulu (Hawaii).

  30. Corrado, C., C. Hulten and D. Sichel (2009), Intangible capital and U.S. economic growth, Review of Income and Wealth 55 (3), 661-85.

  31. Damgaard, J., T. Elkjaer, and N. Johannesen (2019), What is real and what is not in the global FDI network? IMF WP #19/274, IMF, Washington DC.

  32. De Vries, K. (2022), TED - Sources & methods - Detailed description (version: April 2022), The Conference Board, New York.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Debenham, J. (2002), Estimating Knowledge Decay, In: M. Musen, B. Neumann, and R. Studer (eds), Intelligent Information Processing. IIP 2002. IFIP - The International Federation for Information Processing, Springer, 93, 189–200.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Dutta, S., F. Gurry, and B. Lanvin (2020). The global innovation index 2020: Who Will Finance Innovation?, Cornell University, INSEAD, and World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  35. Egger, H. and U. Kreickemeier (2013), Why foreign ownership may be good for you, International Economic Review, 54, 693–716.

  36. Escalona Reynoso, R. (2010), Are intellectual property rights evolving towards the enclosure of the ‘intangible commons’?, Dept of Science and Technology Studies, Cornell University, MPRA Paper #42662, München.

  37. Fagerberg, J., M. Fosaas, and K. Sapprasert (2012), Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base, Research Policy, 41 (7), 1132-1153.

  38. Foster, G., R. Kasznik, and B. Sidhu (2012), International equity valuation: The relative importance of country and industry factors vs. company-specific financial reporting information, Accounting and Finance, 52 (3), 767-814.

  39. Freeman, C. (1987), Technology and economic performance: lessons from Japan, Pinter, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  40. Gerbin, A., and M. Drnovsek (2016), Determinants and public policy implications of academic-industry knowledge transfer in life sciences: A review and a conceptual framework, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 979–1076.

  41. Girma, S., R. Kneller and M. Pisu (2005), Exports versus FDI: An Empirical Test, Review of World Economics, 141, 193–218.

  42. Görg, H., E. Strobl and F. Walsh (2007), Why do foreign-owned firms pay more? The role of on-the-job training, Review of World Economics, 143 (3), 464-482.

  43. Gwartney, J., R. Lawson, J. Hall, and R. Murphy (2021), Economic freedom of the world: 2021 annual report, Fraser Institute, Vancouver BC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. Hall, R. (2000), e-Capital: The link between the stock market and the labor market in the 1990s, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2000 (2): 73-118.

  45. Helpman, E., M. Melitz, and S. Yeaple (2004), Export versus FDI with heterogenous firms, American Economic Review, 94 (1), 300-316.

  46. Henderson, R., A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg (1998), Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80 (1), 119–127.

  47. Keen, M., L. Liu and H. Pallan (2022), Tax spillovers in cross-border real investment: evidence from a new dataset on multinationals, mimeo presented at NBER conference, January 15, 2022.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  48. Keller, W. (2004), International technology diffusion, Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 752– 782.

  49. Kleinert, J. and F. Toubal (2010), Gravity for FDI, Review of International Economics, 18 (1), 1-13.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  50. Kose, M., E. Prasad, K. Rogoff, and S.-J. Wei (2009), Financial globalization: A reappraisal, IMF Staff Papers, 56, 8–62.

  51. Kox, H. (2018), Foreign investment access and the services industry: Quantitative policy analysis for the Philippines, Study commissioned by the IFC/World Bank Group, KVL Economic Policy Research, Hertogenbosch.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  52. Kox, H. and H. Rojas-Romagosa (2010), Exports and Productivity Selection Effects for Dutch Firms, De Economist, 158, 295–322.

  53. Kox, H. and H. Rojas-Romagosa (2020), How trade and investment agreements affect bilateral foreign direct investment: Results from a structural gravity model, The World Economy, 43 (12), 3203–3242.

  54. Kristjánsdóttir, H. (2010), Foreign direct investment: The knowledge-capital model and a small country case, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 57 (5), 591-614.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  55. Liu, J. and C. Kuan (2016), A new approach for main path analysis: Decay in knowledge diffusion, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67 (2), 465–476.

  56. Lu, Y., Z. Tao, and Z. Zhu (2017), Identifying FDI spillovers, Journal of International Economics, 107, 75-90.

  57. Mariel, P., S. Orbe, and C. Rodriguez (2009), The knowledge-capital model of FDI: A time varying coefficients approach, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 56 (2), 196-212.

  58. Markusen, J. (2001), Contracts, intellectual property rights, and multinational investment in developing countries, Journal of International Economics, 53 (1), 189-204.

  59. Markusen, J. (2002), Multinational firms and the theory of international trade, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  60. Markusen, J. and K. Maskus (2003), Discriminating among alternative theories of the multinational enterprise, Review of International Economics, 10 (4), 694-707.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  61. Maskus, K. and J. Reichman (2004), The globalization of private knowledge and the privatization of global public goods, Journal of Economic Law, 7 (2), 279-320.

  62. Mataloni Jr, R. (2011), The productivity advantage and global scope of U.S. multinational firms, BEA Working Paper WP2011-02, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Mazzucato, M., 2014, The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths, Anthem Press, London - New York.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  64. McGrattan, E. (2012), Transition to FDI openness: Reconciling theory and evidence, Research Department Staff Report #454, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis.

  65. McGrattan, E., and E. Prescott (2009), Openness, technology capital, and development, Journal of Economic Theory, 144 (6), 2454–2476.

  66. McGrattan, E., and E. Prescott (2010), Technology capital and the US current account, American Economic Review, 100 (4), 1493-1522.

  67. Morck, R. and B. Yeung (1991), Why investors value multinationality, The Journal of Business, 64 (2), 165-187.

  68. OECD (1997), National innovation systems, OECD, Paris.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  69. Perkmann, M., V. Tartari, M. McKelvey, et al. (2013), Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations, Research Policy, 42 (2), 423–442.

  70. Sheer, L. (2022), Sitting on the fence: Integrating the two worlds of scientific discovery and invention within the firm, Research Policy, 51 (7), forthcoming: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104550

  71. Tanaka A. (2015), Wage premiums for exporters and multinational enterprises: evidence from Japanese linked employer-employee data, Discussion papers #15106, Trade and Industry (RIETI), Tokyo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  72. Tanaka, K. (2009), Re-estimating the knowledge-capital model: Evidence from Japanese and U.S. multinational enterprises, Global COE Hi-Stat DP #087, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo.

  73. Toole, A., and D. Czarnitzki (2010), Commercializing science: Is there a university “brain drain” from academic entrepreneurship?, Management Science, 56 (9), 1599-1614.

  74. Ubaldo, M. di, and I. Siedschlag (2021), Investment in knowledge-based capital and productivity: Firm-level evidence from a small open economy, Review of Income and Wealth, 67 (2), 363-393.

  75. UNCTAD (2022), Corporate income taxes and investment incentives: A global review, Investment Policy Monitor, Special Issue #8, July 2022.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. UNCTAD (2022), World Investment Report 2022: International tax reforms and sustainable investment, UNCTAD/WIR/2022, United Nations Publications, New York.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  77. Van Elk, R., B. ter Weel, K. van der Wiel, and B. Wouterse (2019), Estimating the returns to public R&D investments: Evidence from production function models, De Economist, 167 () , 45–87.

  78. Vujanović, N., I. Hashi, M. Hisarciklilar, et al. (2022), FDI spillover effects on innovation activities of knowledge-using and knowledge-creating firms, WP 213, Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (WIIW), Vienna.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  79. Wacker, K. (2016), (When) should we use foreign direct investment data to measure the activities of multinational corporations? Theory and evidence, Review of International Economics, 24 (5), 980-999.

  80. Wagner, J. (2012), International trade and firm performance: a survey of empirical studies since 2006, Review of World Economics, 148 (2), 235-267.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Trust and the market for technology. (2015). Webster, Elizabeth ; Palangkaraya, Alfons ; Jensen, Paul.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:44:y:2015:i:2:p:340-356.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Fishing for Complementarities: Competitive Research Funding and Research Productivity. (2013). Lawson, Cornelia ; Hottenrott, Hanna.
    In: Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers.
    RePEc:uto:dipeco:201354.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Improving Canadas Productivity Performance: The Potential Contribution of Firm-level Productivity Research. (2013). Veall, Michael ; Ryan, Annette .
    In: International Productivity Monitor.
    RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:26:y:2013:5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. When does centrality matter? Scientific productivity and the moderating role of research specialization and cross-community ties. (2013). Rotolo, Daniele ; Petruzzelli, Antonio Messeni.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:53406.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The Double-Edge Sword of Industry Collaboration: Evidence from Engineering Academics in the UK. (2013). Lawson, Cornelia ; Jofre-Bonet, Mireia ; Banal-Estanol, Albert ; Banal-Estaol, Albert ; Meissner, Cornelia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bge:wpaper:491.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Academic inventions outside the university: A result of industry sponsorship or entrepreneurial activities?. (2012). Lawson, Cornelia.
    In: Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation Franco Momigliano, Bureau of Research i.
    RePEc:uto:labeco:201216.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Research Grants, Sources of Ideas and the Effects on Academic Research. (2012). Lawson, Cornelia ; Hottenrott, Hanna.
    In: Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation Franco Momigliano, Bureau of Research i.
    RePEc:uto:labeco:201215.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Commercializing inventions from public research: Does speed matter?. (2012). Schacht, Alexander .
    In: Jena Economic Research Papers.
    RePEc:jrp:jrpwrp:2012-026.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The impact of regional industries and universities on (high) technology entrepreneurship. (2011). Kitzinger, Elena N. ; Hulsbeck, Marcel .
    In: UO Working Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:auguow:0311.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. We need to talk - or do we? Geographic distance and the commercialization of technologies from public research. (2011). Buenstorf, Guido ; Schacht, Alexander .
    In: Jena Economic Research Papers.
    RePEc:jrp:jrpwrp:2011-061.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Impacts and channels of university spillovers before the national innovation system reform in Japan. (2011). Fukugawa, Nobuya.
    In: International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems.
    RePEc:ids:ijtisy:v:1:y:2011:i:4:p:383-393.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs. (2011). van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, Bruno ; Sapsalis, Eleftherios ; Landoni, Paolo ; van Looy, Bart ; Debackere, Koenraad ; Callaert, Julie .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:40:y:2011:i:4:p:553-564.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Research Output from University-Industry Collaborative Projects. (2011). Perez-Castrillo, David ; Macho-Stadler, Ines ; Banal-Estanol, Albert ; Banal-Estaol, Albert.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bge:wpaper:539.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. University Licensing: Harnessing or Tarnishing Faculty Research?. (2010). Thursby, Jerry .
    In: NBER Chapters.
    RePEc:nbr:nberch:11768.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. PATENTING PUBLIC-FUNDED RESEARCH FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER : A Conceptual-Empirical Synthesis of US Evidence and Lessons for India. (2010). Ray, Amit Shovon ; Saha, Sabyasachi .
    In: Development Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:eab:develo:22918.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Hierarchical Growth: Basic and Applied Research. (2010). Sorger, Gerhard ; Gersbach, Hans ; Amon, Christian .
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:7950.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Determinants of the international influence of a R&D organisation: a bibliometric approach. (2009). Teixeira, Aurora ; Aurora A. C. Teixeira, ; Sequeira, Jose .
    In: FEP Working Papers.
    RePEc:por:fepwps:319.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Commercializing Academic Research: The Quality of Faculty Patenting. (2008). Schneider, Cédric ; Hussinger, Katrin ; Czarnitzki, Dirk.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:7392.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Patents and Academic Research: A State of the Art.. (2008). van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, Bruno ; van Zeebroeck, Nicolas ; Guellec, Dominique.
    In: Working Papers CEB.
    RePEc:sol:wpaper:08-013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The Dynamics of the Transfer and Renewal of Patents. (2008). Serrano, Carlos.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:13938.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. The transfer and commercialisation of nanotechnology: a comparative analysis of university and company researchers. (2008). Palmberg, Christopher.
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:33:y:2008:i:6:p:631-652.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. The effect of informal industry contacts on the time university scientists allocate to collaborative research with industry. (2008). Boardman, Craig P. ; Ponomariov, Branco .
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:33:y:2008:i:3:p:301-313.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. How does University Collaboration Contribute to Successful R&D Management?. (2008). Lööf, Hans ; Broström, Anders ; Brostrom, Anders.
    In: Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation.
    RePEc:hhs:cesisp:0131.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. (2008). Bramwell, Allison ; Wolfe, David A..
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:37:y:2008:i:8:p:1175-1187.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Life Scientist Mobility from Academe to Industry: Does Academic Entrepreneurship Induce a Costly ?Brain Drain? on the Not-for-Profit Research Sector?. (2007). Czarnitzki, Dirk ; Toole, Andrew A..
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:6892.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Exploring the relationship between scientist human capital and firm performance: The case of biomedical academic entrepreneurs in the SBIR program. (2007). Czarnitzki, Dirk ; Toole, Andrew A..
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:5498.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Modes, Challenges and Outcomes of Nanotechnology Transfer - A Comparative Analysis University and Company Researchers. (2007). Palmberg, Christopher.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rif:dpaper:1086.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Determinants of knowledge transfer: evidence from Canadian university researchers in natural sciences and engineering. (2007). Landry, Rejean ; Amara, Nabil ; Ouimet, Mathieu.
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:32:y:2007:i:6:p:561-592.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. The impact of cognitive communities on the diffusion of academic knowledge: Evidence from the networks of inventors of a French university. (2007). HUSSLER, Caroline ; Ronde, Patrick .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:36:y:2007:i:2:p:288-302.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. IPRs, technological and industrial development and growth: the case of the pharmaceutical industry.. (2007). Orsenigo, Luigi ; Montobbio, Fabio ; Laforgia, Francesco.
    In: KITeS Working Papers.
    RePEc:cri:cespri:wp206.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. The Unequal Benefits of Academic Patenting for Science and Engineering Research.. (2007). Vezzulli, Andrea ; Franzoni, Chiara ; Calderini, Mario.
    In: KITeS Working Papers.
    RePEc:cri:cespri:wp203.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Harnessing Success: Determinants of University Technology Licensing Performance. (2007). Belenzon, Sharon ; Schankerman, Mark .
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:6120.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. The Impact of Private Ownership, Incentives and Local Development Objectives on University Technology Transfer Performance. (2007). Belenzon, Sharon ; Schankerman, Mark .
    In: CEP Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0779.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Research valorisation through spin-off ventures: Integration of existing concepts and typologies. (2007). Braet J., ; De Cleyn S., .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ant:wpaper:2007008.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. The Link between Environmental Innovation, Patents, and Environmental Management. (2007). Wagner, Marcus.
    In: DRUID Working Papers.
    RePEc:aal:abbswp:07-14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Labour Mobility of Academic Inventors. Career Decision and Knowledge Transfer. (2006). Nesta, Lionel ; Geuna, Aldo ; Crespi, Gustavo.
    In: SPRU Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:sru:ssewps:139.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality, and Direction of (Public) Research Output. (2006). Azoulay, Pierre ; Ding, Waverly ; Stuart, Toby .
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11917.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Is Academic Entrepreneurship Good or Bad for Science? Empirical Evidence from the Max Planck Society. (2006). Buenstorf, Guido ; Bunstorf, Guido .
    In: Papers on Economics and Evolution.
    RePEc:esi:evopap:2006-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Incentives and Invention in Universities. (2006). Lach, Saul ; Schankerman, Mark .
    In: CEP Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0729.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Determining factors of patent generation in Andalucia (Spain) - Does public policy support technological knowledge generation in universities?. (2005). Coronado, Daniel ; Acosta, Manuel ; Leon, Dolores M ; Marin, Rosario M.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa05p269.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. How well do patent citations measure flows of technology? Evidence from French innovation surveys. (2005). MacGarvie, Megan ; Duguet, Emmanuel.
    In: Economics of Innovation and New Technology.
    RePEc:taf:ecinnt:v:14:y:2005:i:5:p:375-393.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Technology Transfer Offices (TTO) in Italian universities: what they do and how they do it. (2005). Piccaluga, Andrea ; Conti, Giuseppe ; Cesaroni, Fabrizio .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:sse:wpaper:200505.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Is Academic Science Driving a Surge in Industrial Innovation? Evidence from Patent Citations. (2005). Ogura, Yoshiaki ; Branstetter, Lee.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11561.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Academic Freedom, Private-Sector Focus, and the Process of Innovation. (2005). Stein, Jeremy ; Dewatripont, Mathias ; Aghion, Philippe.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11542.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. The Determinants of Faculty Patenting Behavior: Demographics or Opportunities?. (2005). Azoulay, Pierre ; Ding, Waverly ; Stuart, Toby .
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11348.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. If Star Scientists do not Patent: an Event History Analysis of Scientific Eminence and the Decision to Patent in the Academic World. (2005). Vezzulli, Andrea ; Franzoni, Chiara ; Calderini, Mario.
    In: KITeS Working Papers.
    RePEc:cri:cespri:wp169.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. THE RESTRUCTURING OF JAPANESE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT: THE INCREASING IMPACT OF SCIENCE ON JAPANESE R&D. (2004). KWON, Hyeog Ug ; Ug, Kwon Hyeog ; Branstetter, Lee.
    In: Discussion papers.
    RePEc:eti:dpaper:04021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Is academic patenting detrimental to high quality research? An empirical analysis of the relationship between scientific careers and patent applications.. (2004). Franzoni, Chiara ; Calderini, Mario.
    In: KITeS Working Papers.
    RePEc:cri:cespri:wp162.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Incentives and spillovers in R&D activities: an agency-theoretic analysis of industry-university relations. (2003). Lacetera, Nicola.
    In: Microeconomics.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpmi:0312004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Are Faculty Critical? Their Role in University-Industry Licensing. (2003). Thursby, Marie.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:9991.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-13 02:04:59 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.