Agrawal, A. and Henderson, R. (2002). Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science 48(1): 44-60.
Arrow, K. (1962): Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In Nelson, R (ed.) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activities. Princeton University Press.
Audretsch, D, Bozeman, B, Combs, K, Feldman, M, Link, A, Siegel, D, Stephan, P. Tassey, G, Wessner, C. (2002). The Economics of Science and Technology. Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 27, 155-203.
Bonaccorsi, A and Thoma, G. (2005). Scientific and Technological Regimes in Nanotechnology: Combinatorial Inventors and Performance. LEM Working Paper Series, 2005/13.
- Bonaccorsi, A. and Piccaluga, A. (1994). A theoretical framwork for the evaluation of universityindustry relationshios. R&D Management 24, 3.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy 29(4-5): 627-655.
Brennenraedts, R., Bekkers, R. and Verspagen, B. (2006 ). The different charmels of universityindustry knowledge transfer: Empirical evidence from Biomedical Biomedical Engineering.
DEste, P. and Patel, P. (2005). University - industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors determining the variety of interactions with industry? SPRU Working Paper.
- Ecis Working Paper. DEste, P. and Fontana, R. (2006). Collaborative research between academics and firms: what drives the emergence of entrepreneurial academics? Evidence from a large sample of university researchers in the UK. Paper presented at 11th International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society Conference, Sophia Antipolis, 21-24 June 2006.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A, Gebhart, C. and Terra, C. (2000). The future of the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy 29: 313-330.
Franzoni, C. (2006). Do scientists get fundamental research ideas by solving practical problems? Paper presented at 11th International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society Conference, Sophia Antipolis, 2 1-24 June 2006.
- Greene, W. (1997). Econometric analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hill.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Grodal, S. and G. Thoma (2006). Cross-pollination in Science and Technology: The Emergence of theNanobio Subfield. unpublished manuscript.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hall, 5. (2005). Nanofuture - Whats next for nanotechnology? New York: Prometheus Books.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Industry & Higher Education, June 2000.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kline, S. and Rosenberg, N. (1986). An Overview of Innovation. In Landau, R and Rosenberg, N (eds.) The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. National Academy of Sciences (NAS).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Landry, R., Amara, N. and Ouimet, M. (2005). A resource-based approach to knowledge transfer: evidence from Canadian university researchers in natural sciences and engineering.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lipsey, R., Carlaw, K., and Bekart, C. (2005). Economic transformations - General purpose technologies and log term economic growth. Oxford University Press.
- Meyer, M. (2000). Hurdles on the way to commercialising novel technologies - The case of nanotechnology. Helsinki University of Technology, Institute of Strategy and International Business. Working Paper Series 2000:1.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Miettinen, R., Tuunainen, J., Knuuttila, T. and Mattila, E. (2006). Tieteestä tuotteeksi? Yliopistotutkimus muutosten ristipaineessa. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Palmberg, C. and Nikulainen, T. (2006). Industrial Renewal and Growth through Nanotechnology ? - An Overview with Focus on Finland. ETLA Discussion paper 1020.
Palmberg, C., Pajarinen, M. and Nikulainen, T. (2007). Transferring science-based technologies to industry - Does nanotechnology make a difference? ETLA Discussion paper no. 1064.
- Paper presented at the DRUID Tenth Anniversary Conference, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark, June 27-29, 2005.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Poyago-Theotoky, J., Beath, J. and Siegel, D. (2002). Universities and fundamental research: reflections on the growth of university-industry partnerships. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 18, no.1, 10-20.
- Ratner, M. Ratner, D. (2003). Nanotechnology: a gentle introduction to the next big idea. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Schartinger, D, Schibany, A and Gassler, H. (2001). Interactive Relations Between Universities and Firms: Empirical Evidence for Austria. The Journal of Technology Transfer V26(3): 255-26.
Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M. and Fröhlich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy 21, 303-328.
- Valentin, E. (2000). University - industry cooperation: a framework of benefits and obstacles.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ylä-Anttila, P. and Palmberg, C. (2007). Economic and industrial policy transformations in Finland. Forthcoming in Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade.
Youtie, J, lacopetta, M and Graham, 5. (2007). Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? Journal of Technology Transfer.