[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
create a website
Can a Circular Payment Card Format Effectively Elicit Preferences? Evidence From a Survey on a Mandatory Health Insurance Scheme in Tunisia. (2017). CHANEL, Olivier ; Abu-Zaineh, Mohammad ; Makhloufi, Khaled.
In: Post-Print.
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03561065.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 65

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Reducing the anchoring bias in multiple question CV surveys. (2018). CHANEL, Olivier ; Champonnois, Victor ; Makhloufi, Khaled.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:28:y:2018:i:c:p:1-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Striving for Better Jobs : The Challenge of Informality in the Middle East and North Africa. (2014). Bodor, Andras ; Gatti, Roberta ; Silva, Joana ; Angel-Urdinola, Diego F..
    In: World Bank Publications.
    RePEc:wbk:wbpubs:19905.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abu-Zaineh M, Romdhane HB, Ventelou B, Moatti JP, Chokri A. Appraising financial protection in health: the case of Tunisia. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2013;13(1):73–93.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Anderson LR, Mellor JM. Are risk preferences stable? Comparing an experimental measure with a validated survey-based measure. J Risk Uncertain, 2009;39:137-60.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Arrow K, Solow R, Portney PR, Leamer EE, Radner R, Schuman H. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register. 1993;58(10):4601-14.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Asgary A, Willis K, Taghvaei AA, Rafeian M. Estimating rural households’ willingness to pay for health insurance. Eur J Health Econ. 2004;5(3):209-15.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Atkinson AB, Rainwater L, Smeeding TM. Income distribution in OECD countries, evidence from the Luxembourg income study. Volume 18 of OECD Social Policy Studies. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development; 1995.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Barsky RB, Juster FT, Kimball MS, Shapiro MD: Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: an experimental approach in the health and retirement study. Quarterly J Econ. 1997;112(2):537-79 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Bateman IJ, Day BH, Dupont D, Georgiou S: Procedural invariance testing of the one-andone -half-bound dichotomous choice elicitation method. Rev Econ Stat. 2009;91(4): 806820.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Bateman IJ, Langford IH, Jones AP, Kerr GN. Bound and path effects in double and triple bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Resour Energy Econ. 2001;23:191-214.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Bishop R, Woodward R. Valuation of environmental amenities under certainty. In: Bromley D, editor, Handbook of environmental economics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers; 1995. pp. 543–667.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Boyle K, Johnson FR, McCollum D. Anchor and adjustment in single-bounded dichotomouschoice questions. Am J Agric Econ. 1997;79(5):1495-500.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Cameron TA, Huppert DD. OLS versus ML estimation of non-market resource values with payment card interval data. J Environ Econ Manag. 1989;17:230-46.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Cameron TA, Poe GL, Ethier RG, Schulze WD. Alternative non-market value-elicitation methods: are the underlying preferences the same? J Environ Econ Manag. 2002;44:391425.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Carson RT, Groves T. Incentive and information properties of preference questions commentary and extensions. In: Bennett J, editor, International handbook on non‐market valuation. Northampton: Edward Elgar; 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Carson RT, Groves T. Incentive and information properties of preference questions. Environ Resour Econ. 2007;37:181‐210.

  15. Carson RT, Hanemann WM. Chapter 17 Contingent valuation. In: Mäler KG, Vincent JR, Handbook of environmental economics Vol 2.Amsterdam: Elsevier ; 2005. pp. 821-936.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Carthy T, Chilton S, Covey J, Hopkins L, Jones-Lee M, Loomes G, et al. On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation: Part 2 - the CV/SG "chained" approach. J Risk Uncertain. 1999;17:187-213.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Chakravarti IM, Laha RG, Roy J, editors. Handbook of methods of applied statistics. Vol. 1: Techniques of computation, descriptive methods and statistical inference., London: John Wiley and Sons; 1967.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Champ PA, Bishop RC. Is willingness to pay for a public good sensitive to the elicitation format? Land Econ. 2006;82(2):162-73.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Cook J, Jeuland M, Maskery B, Whittington D. Giving stated preference respondents “time to think”: results from four countries. Environ Resour Econ. 2012;51(4):473-96.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Cooper JC, Hanemann WM, Signorello G. One-and-one-half-bound dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Rev Econ Stat. 2002;84:742–50.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Covey J, Loomes G, Bateman I. Valuing risk reductions: testing for range biases in payment card and random card sorting methods. J Environ Planing Manag. 2007;50(4): 467-82.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Donaldson C, Thomas R, Torgerson DJ. Validity of open-ended and payment scale approaches to eliciting willingness to pay. Appl Econ. 1997;29(1):79-84.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Dubourg WB, Jones‐Lee M, Loomes G. Imprecise preferences and survey design in contingent valuation. Economica. 1997;64:681-702.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Dubourg WB, Jones‐Lee M, Loomes G. Imprecise preferences and the WTP-WTA disparity. J Risk Uncertain. 1994;9:115-133.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Fonta WM, Ichoku HE, Kabubo-Mariara J. The effect of protest zeros on estimates of willingness to pay in healthcare contingent valuation analysis. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(4):225-37.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Frör O. Bounded rationality in contingent valuation: empirical evidence using cognitive psychology. Ecol Econ. 2008;68:570-81.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  27. Gatti R, Angel-Urdinola D, Silva J, Bodor A. Striving for better jobs: the challenge of informality in the Middle East and North Africa region: Overview. Washington: World Bank; 2011.

  28. Gibbard A. Manipulation of voting schemes: a general result. Econometrica 1973;41:587601.

  29. Green D, Jacowitz K, Kahneman D, McFadden D. Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods. Resour Energy Econ. 1998;20:85-116.

  30. Gyrd-Hansen D, Jensen ML, Kjaer T. Framing the willingness-to-pay question: impact on response patterns and mean willingness to pay. Health Econ. 2014;23:550–63.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Håkansson C. A new valuation question: Analysis of and insights from interval open-ended data in contingent valuation. Environ Resour Econ. 2008;39(2):175-188.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Hammerschmidt T, Zeitler HP, Leidl R. Unexpected yes- and no-answering behaviour in the discrete choice approach to elicit willingness to pay: A methodological comparison with payment cards. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2003;3:147–66.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Hanemann WM. Theory versus data in the contingent valuation debate. In: Bjornstad J, Kahn JR, editors. The contingent valuation of environmental resources: methodological issues and research needs. Brookfield: Elgar; 1996.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  34. Herriges J, Shogren J. Starting point bias in dichotomous choice valuation with follow-up questioning. J Environ Econ Manag. 1996;30:112-31.

  35. Hoehn J, Randall A. Satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuation. J Environ Econ Manag. 1987;14:226-47.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Hoehn JP, Randall A. Too many proposals pass the benefit cost test. Am. Econ. Rev. 1989;79;544-551.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Hoevenagel R. An assessment of contingent valuation surveys. In: Navrud S, editor, Pricing the European environment. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press; 1992. pp. 177194.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  38. Kanninen B. Bias in discrete response contingent valuation. J Environ Econ Manag. 1995:28:114-25.

  39. Loayza N, Wada T. Informal labor in the Middle East and North Africa: basic measures and determinants. Washington: World Bank, 2009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Lopez-Martin B, Montes C, Benayas J. Economic valuation of biodiversity conservation: the meaning of numbers. Conserv Biology. 2008;22:624–35.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Lunander A. Inducing incentives to understate and to overstate willingness to pay within the open-ended and the dichotomous-choice elicitation formats: an experimental study. J Environ Econ Manag. 1998;35:88-102.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Mahieu P-A, Riera P, Kriström B, Brännlund R, Giergiczny M. Exploring the determinants of uncertainty in contingent valuation surveys. J Environ Econ Policy. 2014;3(2):186-200.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  43. Mahieu PA, Wolff FC, Shogren J. Interval bidding in a distribution elicitation format. FAERE Working Paper, 2014.16, 2014.

  44. Makhloufi K, Ventelou B, Abu-Zaineh M. Have health insurance reforms in Tunisia attained their intended objectives? Int J Health Care Finance Econ, 2015;15(1):29-51.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Mitchell RC, Carson RT. An experiment in determining willingness to pay for national water quality improvements. US Environmental Protection Agency report (grant #R 806906010). Washington: Resources for the Future; 1981.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Mitchell RC, Carson RT. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1989.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. NIS, National Institute of Statistics Tunisia: First Results of Employment - National Survey second quarter, Tunis: NIS; 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. O’Connell T, Rasanathan K, Chopra M. What does universal health coverage mean? Lancet 2014;383(9913):277–9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Riera P. Incentive compatibility in environmental valuation: some positive results. Bilbao: EAERE; 2003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Ryan M, Scott DA, Donaldson C. Valuing health care using willingness to pay: a comparison of the payment card and dichotomous choice methods. J Health Econ. 2004;23(2):237-58.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Satterthwaite M. Strategy-proofness and arrow conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and welfare functions. J Econ Theory. 1975;10:187–217..
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Schläpfer F, Bräuer I. Theoretical incentive properties of contingent valuation questions: do they matter in the field? Ecol Econ. 2007;62:451-60.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Smith RD. It's not just what you do, it's the way that you do it: the effect of different payment card formats and survey administration on willingness to pay for health gain. Health Econ. 2006;15(3):281-93.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Uehleke R. Willingness to pay for national climate change mitigation policies: elicitation format and scope effects. Istanbul: 5th WCERE; 2014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Vega J. Universal health coverage: the post-2015 development agenda. Lancet 2013;381:179-80.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Veisten K, Navrud S. Contingent valuation and actual payment for voluntarily provided passive-use values: assessing the effect of an induced truth-telling mechanism and elicitation formats. Appl Econ. 2006;38:735-56.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Wang H, Whittington D. Measuring individuals’ valuation distributions using a stochastic payment card approach. Ecol Econ. 2005;55:143-54.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  58. Welsh MP, Poe GL. Elicitation effects in contingent valuation: comparisons to a multiple bounded discrete choice approach. J Environ Econ Manag. 1998;36:170-85.

  59. Whynes DK, Frew E, Wolstenholme JL. A comparison of two methods for eliciting contingent valuations of colorectal cancer screening. J Health Econ. 2003;22:555–74.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  60. Whynes DK, Frew E, Wolstenholme JL. Willingness-to-pay and demand curves: a comparison of results obtained using different elicitation formats. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2005;5:369–86.

  61. Whynes DK, Wolstenholme JL, Frew E. Evidence of range bias in contingent valuation payment scales. Health Econ. 2004;13:183-90.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Wilson TD, Houston CE, Etling KM, Brekke N. A new look at anchoring effects: basic anchoring and its antecedents. J Exp Psychol: General. 1996;125(4):387-402.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Wooldridge JM. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. 2nd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2002.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. World Health Organization (WHO): The World Health Report 2013: Research for Universal Health Coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013 11 Damrongplasit K, Melnick G. Funding, coverage, and access under Thailand’s universal health insurance program: An update after ten years. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015;13(2):157-66.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Yang S-H, Hu W, Mupandawana M, Liu Y. Consumer willingness to pay for fair trade coffee: a Chinese case study. J Agri Appl Econ. 2012;44(1):21–34.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Effects of the number of alternatives in public good discrete choice experiments. (2021). Boxall, Peter ; Boyle, Kevin J ; Morrison, Mark D ; Weng, Weizhe ; Rose, John.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:182:y:2021:i:c:s0921800920321959.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Disentangling the effects of policy and payment consequentiality and risk attitudes on stated preferences. (2018). Zawojska, Ewa ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Bartczak, Anna.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2018-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Using Massive Online Choice Experiments to Measure Changes in Well-being. (2018). Collis, Avinash ; Brynjolfsson, Erik ; Gannamaneni, Avinash ; Eggers, Felix.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:24514.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Valuing Global Ecosystem Services: What Do European Experts Say? Applying the Delphi Method to Contingent Valuation of the Amazon Rainforest. (2018). Strand, Jon ; Navrud, Stale.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:70:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10640-017-0119-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Single-Choice, Repeated-Choice, and Best-Worst Scaling Elicitation Formats: Do Results Differ and by How Much?. (2018). Petrolia, Daniel ; Interis, Matthew ; Hwang, Joonghyun.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:69:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10640-016-0083-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Do Looks Matter? A Case Study on Extensive Green Roofs Using Discrete Choice Experiments. (2018). Vranken, Liesbet ; Bleys, Brent ; Vanstockem, Jan ; Hermy, Martin ; Somers, Ben.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:309-:d:128657.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Estimating the Value of Crop Diversity Conservation Services Provided by the Czech National Programme for Agrobiodiversity. (2018). Ščasný, Milan ; Tyack, Nicholas.
    In: Working Papers IES.
    RePEc:fau:wpaper:wp2018_09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Pooling stated and revealed preference data in the presence of RP endogeneity. (2018). Helveston, John Paul ; Michalek, Jeremy J ; Feit, Elea McDonnell .
    In: Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.
    RePEc:eee:transb:v:109:y:2018:i:c:p:70-89.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Farmers’ willingness to participate in collective biogas investment: A discrete choice experiment study. (2018). Zemo, Kahsay Haile ; Termansen, Mette.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:52:y:2018:i:c:p:87-101.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Reply to “a comment on ‘three reasons to use annual payments in contingent valuation’”. (2018). Egan, Kevin J ; Dwyer, Daryl F ; Corrigan, Jay R.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:88:y:2018:i:c:p:489-495.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. In search of an inclusive approach: Measuring non-market values for the effects of complex dam, hydroelectric and river system operations. (2018). Jones, Benjamin ; Berrens, Robert ; Wehde, Wesley ; Gupta, Kuhika ; Carlson, Deven ; Ripberger, Joe ; Silva, Carol ; Jenkins-Smith, Hank.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:69:y:2018:i:c:p:225-236.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Sustainable consumption dilemmas. (2017). Vringer, Kees ; Dietz, Frank ; Vollebergh, Herman ; van Soest, Daan ; van der Heijden, Eline.
    In: Other publications TiSEM.
    RePEc:tiu:tiutis:d683e2ed-c465-468e-b537-01a0a0069d76.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Baseline risk and marginal willingness to pay for health risk reduction. (2017). Veronesi, Marcella ; Adamowicz, Wiktor ; Gerking, Shelby ; Dickie, Mark.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:55:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11166-017-9267-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The Role of Implicit Associations in the Hypothetical Bias. (2017). Verneau, Fabio ; del Giudice, Teresa ; la Barbera, Francesco.
    In: Journal of Consumer Affairs.
    RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:51:y:2017:i:2:p:312-328.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Protest Responses and Willingness to Accept: Ecosystem Services Providers’ Preferences towards Incentive-Based Schemes. (2017). Villanueva, Anastasio J ; Rodriguez-Entrena, Macario ; Glenk, Klaus.
    In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:jageco:v:68:y:2017:i:3:p:801-821.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. ELECTRIC AND PLUG-IN HYBRID VEHICLE DEMAND: LESSONS FOR AN EMERGING MARKET. (2017). Sheldon, Tamara ; Carson, Richard ; Deshazo, J R.
    In: Economic Inquiry.
    RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:55:y:2017:i:2:p:695-713.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. INFORMATION ACQUISITION UNDER RISKY CONDITIONS ACROSS REAL AND HYPOTHETICAL SETTINGS. (2017). Taylor, Matthew P.
    In: Economic Inquiry.
    RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:55:y:2017:i:1:p:352-367.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Germanys Energiewende: A Tale of Increasing Costs and Decreasing Willingness-To-Pay. (2017). Frondel, Manuel ; Andor, Mark ; Vance, Colin ; Mark, Manuel Frondel .
    In: The Energy Journal.
    RePEc:aen:journl:ej38-si1-frondel.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Self-Generation and Households Willingness to Pay for Reliable Electricity Service in Nigeria. (2017). Oseni, Musiliu O.
    In: The Energy Journal.
    RePEc:aen:journl:ej38-4-oseni.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Valuing instream-related services of wastewater. (2016). Weber, Matthew A ; Stromberg, Juliet C ; Meixner, Thomas.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:21:y:2016:i:pa:p:59-71.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Chamberlin Meets Ciriacy-Wantrup: Using Insights from Experimental Economics to Inform Stated Preference Research. (2016). Vossler, Christian.
    In: Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie.
    RePEc:bla:canjag:v:64:y:2016:i:1:p:33-48.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Big Data and Big Cities: The Promises and Limitations of Improved Measures for Urban Life. (2015). Kominers, Scott ; Naik, Nikhil ; Luca, Michael ; Glaeser, Edward L.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecl:harjfk:15-075.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Modelling Heterogeneity and Uncertainty in Contingent Valuation: an Application to the Valuation of Informal Care. (2014). Mentzakis, Emmanouil ; McNamee, Paul ; Paul Mc Namee, ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Scottish Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:61:y:2014:i:1:p:1-25.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Modelling heterogeneity in response behaviour towards a sequence of discrete choice questions: a latent class approach. (2010). McNair, Ben ; Hensher, David ; Bennett, Jeffrey.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:23427.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Conformity and the Demand for Environmental Goods. (2010). Löfgren, Åsa ; García, Jorge ; Carlsson, Fredrik.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:47:y:2010:i:3:p:407-421.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. An Inferred Valuation Method. (2009). Norwood, Bailey ; Lusk, Jayson.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:85:y:2009:i:3:p:500-514.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Proportionality of Willingness to Pay to Small Changes in Risk: The Impact of Attitudinal Factors in Scope Tests. (2009). Pruckner, Gerald ; Leiter, Andrea.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:42:y:2009:i:2:p:169-186.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Who Visits the Museums? A Comparison between Stated Preferences and Observed Effects of Entrance Fees. (2009). Orth, Matilda ; Lampi, Elina.
    In: Kyklos.
    RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:62:y:2009:i:1:p:85-102.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Applying the dissonance-minimising format to value cultural heritage in developing countries *. (2009). TRAN, TUAN ; Navrud, Stale ; Tuan, Tran Huu .
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:53:y:2009:i:3:p:327-343.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Valuations of aircraft noise: experiments in stated preference. (2008). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:39:y:2008:i:4:p:459-480.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Measuring welfare gains from better quality infrastructure. (2007). Lokshin, Michael ; Klytchnikova, Irina .
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:4217.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. The Referendum Incentive Compatibility Hypothesis:Some New Results Using Information Messages. (2007). Stefani, Gianluca ; Scarpa, Riccardo.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:wai:econwp:07/10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Beyond implicit prices: recovering theoretically consistent and transferable values for noise avoidance from a hedonic property price model. (2007). Bateman, Ian.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:37:y:2007:i:1:p:211-232.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Introduction to the special issue in honour of David W. Pearce: environmental economics and policy. (2007). Barbier, Edward ; Bateman, Ian.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:37:y:2007:i:1:p:1-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Willingness to Pay for Private and Public Safety: Why the Difference?. (2007). Svensson, Mikael ; Johansson, Maria Vredin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:oruesi:2007_002.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Willingness to pay for a reduction in the mortality risk after a myocardial infarction: an aplication of the contingent valuation method to the case of eplerenone. (2006). pinto-prades, jose-luis ; Farreras, Verónica ; de Bobadilla, Jaime Fernandez.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pab:wpaper:06.17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Do Experience and Cheap Talk influence Willingness to Pay in an Open-Ended Contingent Valuation Survey?. (2006). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Is Cost–Benefit Analysis Anomaly-Proof?. (2005). Shogren, Jason ; Hanley, Nick.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:32:y:2005:i:1:p:13-24.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Modeling Elicitation effects in contingent valuation studies: a Monte Carlo Analysis of the bivariate approach. (2005). Strazzera, Elisabetta ; Genius, Margarita.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200502.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Contingent Valuation and Random Utility Model Estimates of the Recreational Value of King Mackerel. (2005). Whitehead, John.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:apl:wpaper:05-08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Amenity or eyesore? Negative willingness to pay for options to replace electricity transmission towers. (2004). Palmer, Charles ; Mourato, Susana ; Atkinson, Giles ; Day, Brett.
    In: Applied Economics Letters.
    RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:11:y:2004:i:4:p:203-208.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Willingness to Pay among Swedish Households to Avoid Power Outages - A Random Parameter Tobit Model Approach. (2004). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0154.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Contingent valuation of community plantations in Ethiopia: a look into value elicitation formats and intra-household preference variations. (2004). Köhlin, Gunnar ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Mekonnen, Alemu ; Kohlin, Gunnar.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0151.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Examining the Role of Social Isolation on Stated Preferences. (2004). list, john ; Bohara, Alok ; Berrens, Robert.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:94:y:2004:i:3:p:741-752.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Using stated preference methods to evaluate the impact of water on health: the case of metropolitan Cairo. (2003). Abou-Ali, Hala.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0113.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Estimating Benefits for Effective Enforcement of Speed Reduction from Dichotomous-Choice CV. (2001). Scarpa, Riccardo.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:20:y:2001:i:4:p:281-304.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Application of Sample Selection Model to Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Studies. (2001). Yoo, Seung-Hoon.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:20:y:2001:i:2:p:147-163.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias. (2001). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:19:y:2001:i:4:p:383-402.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market Valuation. (2001). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Alpizar Rodriguez, Francisco.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0052.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-05 19:48:54 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.