[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
create a website
Disentangling the effects of policy and payment consequentiality and risk attitudes on stated preferences. (2018). Zawojska, Ewa ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Bartczak, Anna.
In: Working Papers.
RePEc:war:wpaper:2018-01.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 9

Citations received by this document

Cites: 40

References cited by this document

Cocites: 28

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Willingness to Buy and/or Pay Disparity: Evidence from Fully Autonomous Vehicles. (2021). Managi, Shunsuke ; Keeley, Alexander ; Kawabata, Yuta ; Kumagai, Junya ; Yoo, Sunbin.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:108882.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Hypothetical bias remains at the heart of controversy about the reliability and validity of value estimates from discrete choice experiments (DCEs). This especially applies to environmental valuation,. (2020). Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Glenk, Klaus ; Budziski, Wiktor ; Colombo, Sergio .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2020-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Payment and provision consequentiality in voluntary contribution mechanism: separate or joint effects?. (2020). He, Jie ; Ndefo, Franck ; Dupras, Jerome ; Poder, Thomas.
    In: Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences.
    RePEc:spr:lsprsc:v:13:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s12076-020-00242-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Econometric Studies on the Development of Renewable Energy Sources to Support the European Union 2020–2030 Climate and Energy Framework: A Critical Appraisal. (2020). Tarancon, Miguel-Angel ; Callejas-Albiana, Fernando-Evaristo ; Quintana-Rojo, Consolacion ; Martinez-Rodriguez, Isabel.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:4828-:d:370835.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Energy Demand Management and Social Norms. (2020). Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Bartczak, Anna ; Gobiowska, Bernadeta.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:15:p:3779-:d:388610.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Measuring the Direct and Indirect Effect of Scientific Information On Valuing Stormwater Management Programs: A Hybrid Choice Model. (2020). Groothuis, Peter ; Gu, Chuanhui ; William, JR ; Cockerill, Kristan ; Whitehead, John C ; Mohr, Tanga M.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:apl:wpaper:20-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Mitigating strategic misrepresentation of values in open-ended stated preference surveys by using negative reinforcement. (2018). Zawojska, Ewa ; Louviere, Jordan ; Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre ; Dit, Romain Crastes.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:28:y:2018:i:c:p:153-166.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. A Consequential Contingent Valuation Referendum: Still Not Enough to Elicit True Preferences for Public Goods!. (2017). Zawojska, Ewa ; Ewa, Zawojska.
    In: Central European Economic Journal.
    RePEc:vrs:ceuecj:v:2:y:2017:i:49:p:73-90:n:6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Bahamonde-Birke, F. J., Ortúzar, J. d. D. 2017. Analyzing the continuity of attitudinal and perceptual indicators in hybrid choice models. Journal of Choice Modelling 25, 28−39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2017.01.003 Bartczak, A., Chilton, S., Czajkowski, M., Meyerhoff, J. 2017. Gain and loss of money in a choice experiment. The impact of financial loss aversion and risk preferences on willingness to pay to avoid renewable energy externalities. Energy Economics 65, 326– 334.

  2. Bartczak, A., Mariel, P., Chilton, S., Meyerhoff, J. 2015. The impact of latent risk preferences on valuing the preservation of threatened lynx populations in Poland. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 60 (2), 284−306.

  3. Ben-Akiva, M., McFadden, D., Train, K., Walker, J., Bhat, C., Bierlaire, M., . . . Munizaga, M. 2002. Hybrid Choice Models: Progress and Challenges. Marketing Letters 13 (3), 163−175. doi:10.1023/A:1020254301302 Boyce, C., Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N. 2017. Personality and Economic Choices. Working Paper 11/2017 (240). Department of Economics, University of Warsaw, Poland.

  4. Broadbent, C.D. 2012. Hypothetical Bias, Consequentiality and Choice Experiments.

  5. Broadbent, C.D., Grandy, J.B., Berrens, R. 2010. Testing for Hypothetical Bias in a Choice Experiment Using a Local Public Good: Riparian Forest Restoration. International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics 19 (F10), 1−19.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Budziński, W., Czajkowski, M. 2017. Addressing measurement error and endogeneity in hybrid choice models. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, April 3−5, Athens, Greece.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  7. Bulte, E., Gerking, S., List, J. A., de Zeeuw, A. 2005. The Effect of Varying the Causes of Environmental Problems on Stated WTP Values: Evidence from a Field Study. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 49 (2), 330−342.

  8. Carson, R.T., Groves, T. 2007. Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environmental and Resource Economics 37 (1), 181−210.

  9. Carson, R.T., Groves, T., List, J.A. 2014. Consequentiality: A Theoretical and Experimental Exploration of a Single Binary Choice. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 1 (1/2), 171−207.

  10. Champ, P., Flores, N. E., Brown, T., Chivers, J. 2002. Contingent Valuation and Incentives. Land Economics 78 (4), 591–604.

  11. Cummings, R. G., Osborne Taylor, L. 1998. Does Realism Matter in Contingent Valuation Surveys? Land Economics 74 (2), 203−215.

  12. Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N., and Nyborg, K. 2017. Social norms, morals and self-interest as determinants of pro-environment behaviours: The case of household recycling. Environmental and Resource Economics 66 (4), 647−670.

  13. Czajkowski, M., Vossler, C.A., Budziński, W., Wiśniewska, A., Zawojska, E. 2017. Addressing empirical challenges related to the incentive compatibility of stated preference methods. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 142, 47−63.

  14. Erdem, C., Senturk, I., Simsek, T. 2010. Identifying the factors affecting the willingness to pay for fuel-efficient vehicles in Turkey: A case of hybrids. Energy Policy 38 (6), 3038−3043.

  15. Faccioli, M., Kuhfuss, L., Czajkowski, M. 2017. Stated preferences for conservation policies under uncertainty: Insights on individuals’ risk attitudes in the environmental domain.

  16. Flores, N.E., Strong, A. 2007. Cost Credibility and the Stated Preference Analysis of Public Goods. Resource and Energy Economics 29 (3), 195–205.

  17. Forbes, K., Boxall, P., Adamowicz, W., De Maio Sukic, A. 2015. Recovering Pacific Rockfish at Risk: The Economic Valuation of Management Actions. Frontiers in Marine Science 2 (71), 1−10.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  18. Groothuis, P.A., Mohr, T.M., Whitehead, J.C., Cockerill, K. 2017. Endogenous Consequentiality in Stated Preference Referendum Data: The Influence of the Randomly Assigned Tax Amount. Land Economics 93 (2), 258−268. doi:10.3368/le.93.2.258 Herriges, J., Kling, C., Liu, C.-C., and Tobias, J. 2010. What are the consequences of consequentiality? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59(1), 67−81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2009.03.004 Hess, S., Beharry-Borg, N. (2011). Accounting for Latent Attitudes in Willingness-to-Pay Studies: The Case of Coastal Water Quality Improvements in Tobago. Environmental and Resource Economics 52 (1), 109−131. doi:10.1007/s10640-011-9522-6 Hwang, J., Petrolia, D.R., Interis, M.G. (2014). Valuation, Consequentiality, and Opt-Out Responses to Stated Preference Surveys. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 43 (3), 471−488.

  19. Interis, M.G., Petrolia, D.R. (2014). The Effects of Consequentiality in Binary- and Multinomial-Choice Surveys. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 29 (2) 201−216.

  20. Johnston, R.J., Boyle, K.J., Adamowicz, W., Bennett, J., Brouwer, R., Cameron, T.A., . . . Vossler, C.A. 2017. Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4 (2), 319−405.

  21. Kataria, M., Bateman, I., Christensen, T., Dubgaard, A., Hasler, B., Hime, S., . . . Nissen, C. 2012. Scenario Realism and Welfare Estimates in Choice Experiments – A Non-Market Valuation Study on the European Water Framework Directive. Journal of Environmental Management 94 (1), 25−33.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  22. Kling, C.L., Phaneuf, D.J., Zhao, J. 2012. From Exxon to BP: Has Some Number Become Better than No Number? The Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (4), 3−26. doi:10.2307/23290277 Zawojska, E. et al. / WORKING PAPERS 1/2018 (260) 33 Krinsky, I., Robb, A. L. (1986). On Approximating the Sstatistical Properties of Elasticities. The Review of Economics and Statistics 68(4), 715−719.

  23. Landry, C.E., List, J.A. 2007. Using Ex Ante Approaches to Obtain Credible Signals for Value in Contingent Markets: Evidence from the Field. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89 (2), 420−429.

  24. Lewis, K.E., Grebitus, C., Nayga, R.M., Jr. 2016. U.S. consumers’ Preferences for Imported and Genetically Modified Sugar: Examining Policy Consequentiality in a Choice Experiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 65, 1−8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2016.10.001 Li, X., Jensen, K.L., Clark, C.D., Lambert, D.M. 2015. Scale Heterogeneity, Consequentiality, and Willingness-to-Pay for Public Goods: The Case of Beef Choices. Paper presented at the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association and Western Agricultural Economics Association Joint Annual Meeting, July 26−28, San Francisco, CA.

  25. Manisera, M., Zuccolotto, P. 2014. Modeling “don’t know” Responses in Rating Scales. Pattern Recognition Letters, 45, 226-234.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Mariel, P., Meyerhoff, J. 2016. Hybrid discrete choice models: Gained insights versus increasing effort. Science of The Total Environment 568, 433−443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.019 McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualititative Choice Behaviour, in: P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 105−142.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Mitani, Y., Flores, N. E. (2012). Robustness Tests of Incentive Compatible Referenda: Consequential Probability, Group Size, and Value-cost Difference. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference of European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, June 27−30, Prague, Czech Rebuplic.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  28. Mitani, Y., Flores, N. E. (2014). Hypothetical Bias Reconsidered: Payment and Provision Uncertainties in a Threshold Provision Mechanism. Environmental and Resource Economics 59(3), 433−454.

  29. Mitani, Y., Flores, N.E. (2010). Public goods referenda without perfectly correlated prices and quantities. Paper presented at the 4th World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists, June 28−July 2, Montreal, Canada.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Nepal, M., Berrens, R.P., Bohara, A.K. 2009. Assessing Perceived Consequentiality: Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Survey on Global Climate Change. International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics 14 (P09), 14−29.

  31. Oehlmann, M., Meyerhoff, J. 2017. Stated Preferences Towards Renewable Energy Alternatives in Germany – Do the Consequentiality of the Survey and Trust in Institutions Matter? Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 6 (1), 1−16.

  32. Raveau, S., Yáñez, M.F., Ortúzar, J. d. D. 2012. Practical and Empirical Identifiability of Hybrid Discrete Choice Models. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 46 (10), 1374−1383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2012.06.006 Scarpa, R., Rose, J.M. 2008. Design Efficiency for Non-Market Valuation with Choice Modelling: How to Measure it, What to Report and Why. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 52 (3), 253−282.

  33. Strong, A., Flores, N.E. 2006. Estimating the economic benefits of the clean up of acidic rock drainage using cost shares. Working Paper. Department of Economics, University of Colorado, CO.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  34. Tanaka, T., Camerer, C.F., Nguyen, Q. 2010. Risk and time preferences: Linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. American Economic Review 100 (1), 557−571.

  35. Vossler, C.A., and Holladay, S. 2016. Alternative Value Elicitation Formats in Contingent Valuation: A New Hope. Paper presented at the 22'nd Annual Conference of European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, June 22−25, Zurich, Switzerland.

  36. Vossler, C.A., Bergeron, S., Doyon, M., Rondeau, D. 2017. Revisiting the gap between the willingness-to-pay and willingness-to-accept for public goods. Paper presented at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference, May 31 − June 2, Pittsburgh, PA.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  37. Vossler, C.A., Doyon, M., Rondeau, D. 2012. Truth in consequentiality: theory and field evidence on discrete choice experiments. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4 (4), 145−171.

  38. Vossler, C.A., Watson, S.B. 2013. Understanding the Consequences of Consequentiality: Testing the Validity of Stated Preferences in the Field. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 86, 137−147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.007 Zawojska, E., Czajkowski, M. 2017. Re-examining empirical evidence on stated preferences: Importance of incentive compatibility. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 6 (4), 374−403. UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW FACULTY OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES 44/50 DŁUGA ST. 00-241 WARSAW WWW.WNE.UW.EDU.PL

  39. Zawojska, E. et al. / WORKING PAPERS 1/2018 (260) 32 Daly, A., Hess, S., Patruni, B., Potoglou, D., Rohr, C. 2012. Using ordered attitudinal indicators in a latent variable choice model: a study of the impact of security on rail travel behaviour. Transportation 39 (2), 267−297. doi:10.1007/s11116-011-9351-z Drichoutis, A.C., Vassilopoulos, A., Lusk, J.L., Nayga, R.M., Jr. 2015. Reference Dependence, Consequentiality and Social Desirability in Value Elicitation: A Study of Fair Labor Labeling. Paper presented at the 143rd Joint EAAE-AAEA Seminar, March 25−27, Naples, Italy.

  40. Zawojska, E. et al. / WORKING PAPERS 1/2018 (260) 34 Schafer, J.L., Graham, J. W. 2002. Missing Data: Our View of the State of the Art. Psychological Methods 7 (2), 147−177.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Comparison of externalities of biogas and photovoltaic solar energy for energy planning. (2024). Navas, Luis Manuel ; Rosa, Andre Pereira ; Filho, Delly Oliveira ; Gonalves, Pedro Henrique ; Almeida, Thais Cristina.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:188:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524000909.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Nature is ours! – Psychological ownership and preferences for wind energy. (2024). Navrud, Stale ; Brouwer, Roy ; Dugstad, Anders ; Lindhjem, Henrik ; Kipperberg, Gorm ; Grimsrud, Kristine.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:129:y:2024:i:c:s0140988323007375.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for the Solar Photovoltaic System in the Post-Subsidy Era: A Comparative Analysis under an Urban-Rural Divide. (2022). Li, Siqi ; Han, Mengqiao ; Liu, Diyi ; Xu, Xueer.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:23:p:9022-:d:987320.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Exposure to wind turbines, regional identity and the willingness to pay for regionally produced electricity. (2022). Groh, Elke D.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:70:y:2022:i:c:s0928765522000495.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Do Narcissistic Managers Prefer Incentive Systems Based on Financial Instruments? An Analysis Based on Choice Experiments. (2021). Rabazo-Martin, Aurora E ; Diaz-Caro, Carlos ; Crespo-Cebada, Eva ; Rodriguez-Rivero, Edilberto J.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1255-:d:486860.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. How Much Polish Consumers Know about Alternative Fuel Vehicles? Impact of Knowledge on the Willingness to Buy. (2021). Kott, Joanna ; Kowalska-Pyzalska, Anna.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:5:p:1438-:d:511626.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Fuel mix disclosure in Germany—The effect of more transparent information on consumer preferences for renewable energy. (2021). Vogt, Bodo ; Bengart, Paul.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:150:y:2021:i:c:s0301421520308314.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Does information encourage or discourage tenants to accept energy retrofitting of homes?. (2021). Arentze, Theo A ; Kerperien, Stephan ; Ossokina, Ioulia V.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:103:y:2021:i:c:s0140988321004114.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Choosing the Future: Economic Preferences for Higher Education Using Discrete Choice Experiment Method. (2020). Gajderowicz, Tomasz ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Grotkowska, Gabriela ; Giergiczny, Marek ; Sztandar-Sztanderska, Urszula .
    In: Research in Higher Education.
    RePEc:spr:reihed:v:61:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s11162-019-09572-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Econometric Studies on the Development of Renewable Energy Sources to Support the European Union 2020–2030 Climate and Energy Framework: A Critical Appraisal. (2020). Tarancon, Miguel-Angel ; Callejas-Albiana, Fernando-Evaristo ; Quintana-Rojo, Consolacion ; Martinez-Rodriguez, Isabel.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:4828-:d:370835.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Public preferences for wind farms involving electricity trade and citizen engagement in Ireland. (2020). van Rensburg, Thomas M ; Brennan, Noreen.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:147:y:2020:i:c:s0301421520305887.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Environmental attitudes and place identity as determinants of preferences for ecosystem services. (2020). Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Martin-Ortega, Julia ; Glenk, Klaus ; Faccioli, Michela.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:174:y:2020:i:c:s0921800919308626.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Stated Preferences for Conservation Policies Under Uncertainty: Insights on the Effect of Individuals’ Risk Attitudes in the Environmental Domain. (2019). Kuhfuss, Laure ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Faccioli, Michela.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:73:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10640-018-0276-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Do Consumers Want to Pay for Green Electricity? A Case Study from Poland. (2019). Kowalska-Pyzalska, Anna.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1310-:d:210352.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Disentangling the effects of policy and payment consequentiality and risk attitudes on stated preferences. (2019). Zawojska, Ewa ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Bartczak, Anna .
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:93:y:2019:i:c:p:63-84.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Towards flexible energy demand – Preferences for dynamic contracts, services and emissions reductions. (2019). Ruokamo, Enni ; Svento, Rauli ; Merilainen, Teemu ; Kopsakangas-Savolainen, Maria.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:84:y:2019:i:c:s0140988319303111.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Support for Transnational Conservation in a Gain-Loss Context. (2019). Strange, Niels ; Vogdrup-Schmidt, Mathias ; Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:162:y:2019:i:c:p:49-58.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Household willingness to pay for green electricity in Poland. (2018). Kowalska-Pyzalska, Anna ; Ramsey, David.
    In: HSC Research Reports.
    RePEc:wuu:wpaper:hsc1804.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. An empirical analysis of green energy adoption among residential consumers in Poland. (2018). Kowalska-Pyzalska, Anna.
    In: HSC Research Reports.
    RePEc:wuu:wpaper:hsc1801.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Impact of beliefs about negative effects of wind turbines on preference heterogeneity regarding renewable energy development in Poland. (2018). Gołębiowska, Bernadeta ; Budzinski, Wiktor ; Bartczak, Anna ; Gobiowska, Bernadeta ; Budziski, Wiktor.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2018-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Environmental attitudes and place identity as simultaneous determinants of preferences for environmental goods. (2018). Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Martin-Ortega, Julia ; Glenk, Klaus ; Faccioli, Michela.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2018-08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Disentangling the effects of policy and payment consequentiality and risk attitudes on stated preferences. (2018). Zawojska, Ewa ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Bartczak, Anna.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2018-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. An Empirical Analysis of Green Electricity Adoption Among Residential Consumers in Poland. (2018). Kowalska-Pyzalska, Anna.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2281-:d:155700.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Perceived and Reported Reliability of the Electricity Supply at Three Urban Locations in Indonesia. (2018). Reinders, Angele.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:140-:d:125734.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Choosing the future: economic preferences for higher education using discrete choice experiment method. (2017). Giergiczny, Marek ; Gajderowicz, Tomasz ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Sztandar-Sztanderska, Urszula ; Grotkowska, Gabriela.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2017-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. A Monte Carlo Evaluation of the Logit-Mixed Logit under Asymmetry and Multimodality. (2017). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Thiene, Mara ; Franceschinis, Cristiano ; Scarpan, Riccardo.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:wai:econwp:17/23.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. A turbine is not only a turbine: The role of social context and fairness characteristics for the local acceptance of wind power. (2017). Meyerhoff, Jürgen ; Bartczak, Anna ; Liebe, Ulf.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:107:y:2017:i:c:p:300-308.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-11 02:19:37 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.