[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
create a website
Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations. (2018). Zölitz, Ulf ; Sauermann, Jan ; Zolitz, Ulf ; Mengel, Friederike.
In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7269.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 26

Citations received by this document

Cites: 50

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Gender Bias in Evaluation Processes. (2022). Campos-Vazquez, Raymundo M ; Arceo-Gomez, Eva O.
    In: Economics of Education Review.
    RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:89:y:2022:i:c:s0272775722000486.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Measuring research excellence amongst economics lecturers in the UK. (2022). Sechel, Cristina ; Mumford, Karen ; McManus, Richard.
    In: Bulletin of Economic Research.
    RePEc:bla:buecrs:v:74:y:2022:i:2:p:386-404.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The pregnancy drop: How teaching evaluations penalize pregnant faculty. (2021). Olabisi, Ronke M.
    In: Palgrave Communications.
    RePEc:pal:palcom:v:8:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-021-00926-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Measuring Research Excellence Amongst Economics Lecturers in the UK. (2021). Sechel, Cristina ; Mumford, Karen A ; McManus, Richard.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp14156.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Follow My Lead: Assertive Cheap Talk and the Gender Gap. (2021). Sheth, Ketki ; Manian, Shanthi.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:67:y:2021:i:11:p:6880-6896.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Perceptions of relative deprivation and women’s empowerment. (2021). Kosec, Katrina ; Song, Jie ; Schmidt, Emily ; Mo, Cecilia Hyunjung.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:138:y:2021:i:c:s0305750x20303454.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Gender wage gaps and worker mobility: Evidence from the garment sector in Bangladesh. (2021). Woodruff, Christopher ; Menzel, Andreas.
    In: Labour Economics.
    RePEc:eee:labeco:v:71:y:2021:i:c:s092753712100035x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Under pressure: How faculty gender and contract uncertainty impact students’ grades. (2021). Sovero, Veronica ; Griffith, Amanda L.
    In: Economics of Education Review.
    RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:83:y:2021:i:c:s0272775721000455.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Gender Gaps in the Evaluation of Research: Evidence from Submissions to Economics Conferences. (2021). Sanz, Carlos ; Hospido, Laura.
    In: Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics.
    RePEc:bla:obuest:v:83:y:2021:i:3:p:590-618.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Challenges of Change: An Experiment Promoting Women to Managerial Roles in the Bangladeshi Garment Sector. (2020). Woodruff, Christopher ; macchiavello, rocco ; Rabbani, Atonu ; Menzel, Andreas.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27606.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Gender gaps in technology diffusion. (2020). Kondylis, Florence ; Jones, Maria ; Benyishay, Ariel ; ben Yishay, Ariel ; Mobarak, Ahmed Mushfiq.
    In: Journal of Development Economics.
    RePEc:eee:deveco:v:143:y:2020:i:c:s030438781930197x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Challenges of Change: An Experiment Promoting Women to Managerial Roles in the Bangladeshi Garment Sector. (2020). Woodruff, Christopher ; macchiavello, rocco ; Rabbani, Atonu ; Menzel, Andreas.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:15085.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Gender Disparities in Sentencing. (2020). Philippe, Arnaud.
    In: Economica.
    RePEc:bla:econom:v:87:y:2020:i:348:p:1037-1077.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Pay and Job Rank among Academic Economists in the UK: Is Gender Relevant?. (2020). Mumford, Karen ; Sechel, Cristina.
    In: British Journal of Industrial Relations.
    RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:58:y:2020:i:1:p:82-113.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The Strength of Gender Norms and Gender-Stereotypical Occupational Aspirations among Adolescents. (2019). Wolter, Stefan ; Kuhn, Andreas.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12861.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Gender Differences in Political Career Progression: Evidence from U.S. Elections. (2019). O'Connell, Stephen ; Brown, Ryan ; Reeves, James ; Mansour, Hani.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12569.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Gender Gaps in the Evaluation of Research: Evidence from Submissions to Economics Conferences. (2019). Sanz, Carlos ; Hospido, Laura.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12494.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Pay and Job Rank Amongst Academic Economists in the UK: Is Gender Relevant?. (2019). Sechel, Cristina ; Mumford, Karen.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12397.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The Boy Crisis: Experimental Evidence on the Acceptance of Males Falling Behind. (2019). Tungodden, Bertil ; Falch, Ranveig ; Cappelen, Alexander.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hka:wpaper:2019-014.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The Boy Crisis: Experimental Evidence on the Acceptance of Males Falling Behind. (2019). Tungodden, Bertil ; Falch, Ranveig ; Cappelen, Alexander W.
    In: Discussion Paper Series in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:nhheco:2019_006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Gender Wage Gaps and Worker Mobility: Evidence from the Garment Sector in Bangladesh. (2019). Woodruff, Christopher ; Menzel, Andreas .
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:13577.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Gender Differences in Political Career Progression: Evidence from U.S. Elections. (2019). O'Connell, Stephen ; Brown, Ryan ; Reeves, James ; Mansour, Hani.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7821.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Gender gaps in the evaluation of research: evidence from submissions to economics conferences. (2019). Sanz, Carlos ; Hospido, Laura.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bde:wpaper:1918.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Overconfidence and Prejudice. (2019). Strack, Philipp ; Khoszegi, Botond ; Heidhues, Paul.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1909.08497.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. The Effects of Student Feedback to teachers: Evidence from a Field Experiment. (2018). Dur, Robert ; Delfgaauw, Josse ; Zoutenbier, Robin ; Buurman, Margaretha .
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20180042.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abrevaya, Jason, Daniel S. Hamermesh. 2012. Charity and favoritism in the field: Are female economists nicer (to each other)? Review of Economics and Statistics 94(1) 202–207.

  2. Anderson, Heidi M., Jeff Cain, Eleanora Bird. 2005. Online student course evaluations: Review of literature and a pilot study. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 69(1) 5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  3. Bagues, Manuel F., Berta Esteve-Volart. 2010. Can gender parity break the glass ceiling? Evidence from a repeated randomized experiment. Review of Economic Studies 77(4) 1301–1328.

  4. Bagues, Manuel F., Mauro Sylos-Labini, Natalia Zinovyeva. 2017. Does the gender composition of scientific committees matter? American Economic Review 107(4) 1207–1238.

  5. Basow, Susan A., Nancy T. Silberg. 1987. Student evaluation of college professors: Are female and male professor rated differently? Journal of Educational Psychology 79(3) 308–314.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  6. Beaman, Lori, Raghabendra Chattopadhyay, Esther Duflo, Rohini Pande, Petia Topalova. 2009. Powerful women: Does exposure reduce bias? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(4) 1497–1540.

  7. Bennett, Sheila K. 1982. Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: Evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology 74 170–179.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Blank, Rebecca M. 1991. The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review. American Economic Review 81(5) 1041–1067.

  9. Bohnet, Iris, Alexandra van Geen, Max H. Bazerman. 2015. When performance trumps gender bias: Joint versus separate evaluation. Management Science 62(5) 1225–1234.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Boring, Anne. 2017. Gender biases in student evaluations of teachers. Journal of Public Economics 145 27–41.

  11. Braga, Michela, Marco Paccagnella, Michele Pellizzari. 2014. Evaluating students’ evaluations of professors. Economics of Education Review 41 71–88.

  12. Broder, Ivy E. 1993. Review of NSF economics proposals: Gender and institutional patterns. American Economic Review 83(4) 964–970.

  13. Carrell, Scott, James E. West. 2010. Does professor quality matter? evidence from random assignment of students to professors. Journal of Political Economy 118(3) 409–432.

  14. Centra, John A., Noreen B. Gaubatz. 2000. Is there gender bias in student evaluations of teaching? Journal of Higher Education 71(1) 17–33.

  15. Coffman, Katherine Baldiga. 2014. Evidence on self-stereotyping and the contribution of ideas. Quarterly Journal of Economics 129(4) 1625–1660.

  16. Croson, Rachel, Uri Gneezy. 2009. Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature 47(2) 448–474.

  17. Dar-Nimrod, Ilan, Steven J. Heine. 2006. Exposure to scientific theories affects women’s math performance. Science 314(5798) 435.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  18. De Paola, Maria, Vincenzo Scoppa. 2015. Gender discrimination and evaluators’ gender: Evidence from the Italian academia. Economica 82(325) 162–188.

  19. Elmore, Patricia B., Karen A LaPointe. 1974. Effects of teacher sex and student sex on the evaluation of college instructors. Journal of Educational Psychology 66 386–389.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. European Commission. 2009. She figures 2009: Statistics and indicators on gender equality in science. Tech. rep., European Commission.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  21. Feld, Jan, Ulf Zölitz. 2017. Understanding peer effects: On the nature, estimation and channels of peer effects. Journal of Labor Economics 35(2).

  22. Hamermesh, Daniel S., Amy Parker. 2005. Beauty in the classroom: Instructors’ pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity. Economics of Education Review 24 369–376.

  23. Harris, Mary B. 1975. Sex role stereotypes and teacher evaluations. Journal of Educational Psychology 67 751–756.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Hederos Eriksson, Karin, Anna Sandberg. 2012. Gender differences in initiation of negotiation: Does the gender of the negotiation counterpart matter? Negotiation Journal 28(4) 407–428.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Heilman, Madeline E., Julie J. Chen. 2005. Same behavior, different consequences: Reactions to men’s and women’s altruistic citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 90(3) 431–441.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Hernández-Arenaz, Iñigo, Nagore Iriberri. 2016. Women ask for less (only from men): Evidence from alternating-offer bargaining in the field. Unpublished manuscript.

  27. Hoffman, Florian, Philip Oreopoulos. 2009. Professor qualities and student achievement. Review of Economics and Statistics 91(1) 83–92.

  28. Kahn, Shulamit. 1993. Gender differences in academic career paths of economists. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 83(2) 52–56.

  29. Kaschak, Ellyn. 1978. Sex bias in student evaluations of college professors. Psychology of Women Quarterly 2 235–243.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Krawczyk, Michal W., Magdalena Smyk. 2016. Author’s gender affects rating of academic articles - evidence from an incentivized, deception-free experiment. European Economic Review 90 326–335. Mimeo.

  31. Lalanne, Marie, Paul Seabright. 2011. The Old Boy Network: Gender Differences in the Impact of Social Networks on Remuneration in Top Executive Jobs. C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers 8623, Center for Economic and Policy Research.

  32. Leibbrandt, Andreas, John A. List. 2015. Do women avoid salary negotiations? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. Management Science 61(9) 2016–2024.

  33. Link, Albert N., Christopher A. Swann, Barry Bozeman. 2008. A time allocation study of university faculty. Economics of Education Review 27 363–374.

  34. MacNell, Lillian, Adam Driscoll, Andrea N. Hunt. 2015. What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Innovative Higher Education 40(4) 291–303.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Marsh, Herbert W. 1984. Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential baises, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology 76(5) 707.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  36. McDowell, John M., Larry D. Singell, James P. Ziliak. 1999. Cracks in the glass ceiling: Gender and promotion in the economics profession. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 89(2) 397–402.

  37. McElroy, Marjorie B. 2016. Committee on the status of women in the economics profession (CSWEP). American Economic Review 106(5) 750–773.

  38. National Science Foundation. 2009. Characteristics of doctoral scientists and engineers in the us: 2006. Tech. rep., National Science Foundation.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  39. Online Appendix Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations (Friederike Mengel, Jan Sauermann, and Ulf Zölitz) (August 31, 2017)

  40. Potvin, Geoff, Zahra Hazari, Robert H. Tai, Philip M. Sadler. 2009. Unraveling bias from student evaluations of their high school science teachers. Science Education 93(5) 827–845.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. Price, Joseph, Justin Wolfers. 2010. Racial discrimination among NBA referees. Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(4) 1859–1887.

  42. Rockoff, Jonah E., Cecilia Speroni. 2011. Subjective and objective evaluations of teacher effectiveness: Evidence from new york city. Labour Economics 18 687–696.

  43. Shayo, Moses, Asaf Zussman. 2011. Judicial Ingroup Bias in the Shadow of Terrorism.

  44. Spencer, Steven J., Claude M. Steele, Diane M. Quinn. 1998. Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35(1) 4–28.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Stark, Philip B., Richard Freishtat. 2014. An evaluation of course evaluations. Science Open Research 9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Tajfel, Henri, John C. Turner. 1986. The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. Chicago: Nelson Hall.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Van der Lee, Romy, Naomi Ellemers. 2015. Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112(40) 12349–12353.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  48. Wennerås, Christine, Agnes Wold. 1997. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature 387(6631) 341–343.

  49. Wu, Alice H. 2017. Gender stereotyping in academia: Evidence from economics job market rumors forum. Unpublished manuscript.

  50. Zölitz, Ulf, Jan Feld. 2017. The effect of peer gender on major choice and occupational segregation. Unpublished manuscript.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Male Gatekeepers: Gender Bias in the Publishing Process?. (2022). Kvasnicka, Michael ; Bransch, Felix.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:202:y:2022:i:c:p:714-732.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Innovative ideas and gender inequality. (2021). Koffi, Marlene.
    In: CLEF Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:clefwp:35.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Women in research in economics in Uruguay. (2021). Moraes, María Inés ; Bucheli, Marisa ; AMARANTE, VERONICA ; Perez, Tatiana.
    In: Documentos de Trabajo (working papers).
    RePEc:ulr:wpaper:dt-01-21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Women in Research in Economics in Uruguay. (2021). AMARANTE, VERONICA ; Perez, Tatiana ; Moraes, Ines ; Bucheli, Marisa.
    In: Documentos de Trabajo (working papers).
    RePEc:ude:wpaper:0221.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Scapegoating in evaluation decisions. (2021). Zussman, Asaf.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:186:y:2021:i:c:p:152-163.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Gender differences in the academic career of economics in Brazil. (2021). Borges, Bruna ; Narita, Renata ; Montoya, Maria Dolores ; Matsunaga, Liz ; Fabiana, Paula Pereda.
    In: Revista Cuadernos de Economía.
    RePEc:col:000093:020188.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Women in Research in Economics in Uruguay. (2021). Perez, Tatiana ; Moraes, Maria Ines ; Bucheli, Marisa ; Amarante, Veronica.
    In: Revista Cuadernos de Economía.
    RePEc:col:000093:020186.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Gender Gaps in the Evaluation of Research: Evidence from Submissions to Economics Conferences. (2021). Sanz, Carlos ; Hospido, Laura.
    In: Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics.
    RePEc:bla:obuest:v:83:y:2021:i:3:p:590-618.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Are women less persistent? Evidence from submissions to a nationwide meeting of Economics. (2020). Matsunaga, Diaz ; Pereda, Paula.
    In: Working Papers, Department of Economics.
    RePEc:spa:wpaper:2020wpecon19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Are Referees and Editors in Economics Gender Neutral?. (2019). Iriberri, Nagore ; Funk, Patricia ; DellaVigna, Stefano ; Card, David.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25967.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Variation in Women’s Success Across PhD Programs in Economics. (2019). Langan, Andrew ; Boustan, Leah.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25444.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Gender Gaps in the Evaluation of Research: Evidence from Submissions to Economics Conferences. (2019). Sanz, Carlos ; Hospido, Laura.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12494.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Are Referees and Editors in Economics Gender Neutral?. (2019). Iriberri, Nagore ; Funk, Patricia ; Dellavigna, Stefano ; Della Vigna, Stefano ; Card, David.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:13789.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Gender gaps in the evaluation of research: evidence from submissions to economics conferences. (2019). Sanz, Carlos ; Hospido, Laura.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bde:wpaper:1918.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Gender Quotas in Hiring Committees: a Boon or a Bane for Women?. (2018). Deschamps, Pierre.
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/7bucmgmilh9ul9ogmiku5legh5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Gender Quotas in Hiring Committees: a Boon or a Bane for Women?. (2018). Deschamps, Pierre.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03393117.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Gender Quotas in Hiring Committees: a Boon or a Bane for Women?. (2018). Deschamps, Pierre.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03393117.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations. (2018). Zölitz, Ulf ; Sauermann, Jan ; Zolitz, Ulf ; Mengel, Friederike.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7269.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Gender bias in teaching evaluations. (2017). Zölitz, Ulf ; Sauermann, Jan ; Mengel, Friederike ; Zolitz, Ulf Zoelitz.
    In: ROA Research Memorandum.
    RePEc:unm:umaror:2017007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Promotions and Earnings – Gender or Merit? Evidence from Longitudinal Personnel Data. (2017). Pehkonen, Jaakko ; Jokinen, Juho.
    In: Journal of Labor Research.
    RePEc:spr:jlabre:v:38:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s12122-017-9254-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Gender quotas or girls networks? Towards an understanding of recruitment in the research profession in Italy. (2017). Cicognani, Simona ; Checchi, Daniele ; Kulic, Nevena .
    In: Working Paper series.
    RePEc:rim:rimwps:17-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Male Gatekeepers Gender Bias in the Publishing Process?. (2017). Kvasnicka, Michael ; Bransch, Felix.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11089.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations. (2017). Zölitz, Ulf ; Sauermann, Jan ; Mengel, Friederike ; Zolitz, Ulf.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11000.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Tourism’s lost leaders: Analysing gender and performance. (2017). Pritchard, Annette ; Morgan, Nigel.
    In: Annals of Tourism Research.
    RePEc:eee:anture:v:63:y:2017:i:c:p:34-47.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Publishing while Female. Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review.. (2017). Hengel, Erin.
    In: Cambridge Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cam:camdae:1753.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter?. (2017). Zinovyeva, Natalia ; Sylos-Labini, Mauro ; Bagues, Manuel.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:107:y:2017:i:4:p:1207-38.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Field Experiments on Discrimination. (2016). Duflo, Esther ; Bertrand, Marianne.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:22014.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. One Mandarin Benefits the Whole Clan: Hometown Favoritism in an Authoritarian Regime. (2016). Do, Quoc-Anh ; Tran, Anh ; Nguyen, Kieu-Trang.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:11126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Field Experiments on Discrimination. (2016). Bertrand, Marianne ; Duflo, Esther.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:11123.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. One Mandarin Benefits the Whole Clan: Hometown Favoritism in an Authoritarian Regime. (2016). Do, Quoc-Anh ; Tran, Anh N ; Nguyen, Kieu-Trang.
    In: CEP Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp1409.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Age, Cohort and Co-Authorship. (2015). Hamermesh, Daniel.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:20938.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter?. (2015). Zinovyeva, Natalia ; Sylos-Labini, Mauro ; Bagues, Manuel.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp9199.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Age, Cohort and Co-Authorship. (2015). Hamermesh, Daniel.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp8828.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Endophilia or Exophobia: Beyond Discrimination. (2015). Salamanca, Nicolas ; Hamermesh, Daniel ; Feld, Jan.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0593.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Gender quotas or girls networks? Towards an understanding of recruitment in the research profession in Italy. (2015). Cicognani, Simona ; Checchi, Daniele ; Kulic, Nevena .
    In: FBK-IRVAPP Working Papers.
    RePEc:fbk:wpaper:2015-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Gender quotas or girls’ networks? Towards an understanding of recruitment in the research profession in Italy. (2015). Cicognani, Simona ; Checchi, Daniele ; Kulic, N.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bol:bodewp:wp1047.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Do gender quotas pass the test ? Evidence from academic evaluations in Italy. (2014). Zinovyeva, Natalia ; Sylos-Labini, Mauro ; Bagues, Manuel.
    In: LEM Papers Series.
    RePEc:ssa:lemwps:2014/14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Endophilia or exophobia: beyond discrimination. (2013). Salamanca, Nicolas ; Hamermesh, Daniel ; Feld, Jan ; Feld J. F., ; Salamanca Acosta N., ; Hamermesh D., .
    In: ROA Research Memorandum.
    RePEc:unm:umaror:2013008.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Endophilia or exophobia: beyond discrimination. (2013). Salamanca, Nicolas ; Hamermesh, Daniel ; Feld, Jan ; Feld J. F., ; Salamanca Acosta N., ; Hamermesh D., .
    In: Research Memorandum.
    RePEc:unm:umagsb:2013026.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. One Mandarin Benefits the Whole Clan: Hometown Favoritism in an Authoritarian Regime. (2013). Do, Quoc-Anh ; Tran, Anh N. ; Nguyen, Kieu-Trang.
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/6ggbvnr6munghes9ocpp7f52o.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. One Mandarin Benefits the Whole Clan: Hometown Favoritism in an Authoritarian Regime. (2013). Tran, Anh N. ; Do, Quoc-Anh ; Nguyen, Kieu-Trang.
    In: Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/6ggbvnr6munghes9ocpp7f52o.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Endophilia or Exophobia: Beyond Discrimination. (2013). Salamanca, Nicolas ; Hamermesh, Daniel ; Feld, Jan.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19471.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Endophilia or Exophobia: Beyond Discrimination. (2013). Salamanca, Nicolas ; Hamermesh, Daniel ; Feld, Jan.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp7380.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. One Mandarin Benefits the Whole Clan: Hometown Favoritism in an Authoritarian Regime. (2013). Tran, Anh ; Nguyen, Kieu-Trang ; Do, Quoc-Anh.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03460977.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. How well do urban growth boundaries contain development? Results for Oregon using a difference-in-difference estimator. (2013). Plantinga, Andrew J. ; Dempsey, Judith A..
    In: Regional Science and Urban Economics.
    RePEc:eee:regeco:v:43:y:2013:i:6:p:996-1007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Gender complementarities in the labor market. (2013). Pellizzari, Michele ; Paccagnella, Marco ; De Giorgi, Giacomo ; DeGiorgi, Giacomo .
    In: Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers).
    RePEc:bdi:opques:qef_183_13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-11 03:30:34 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.