Private Insurance and Government Programs Drive Up Health Care Costs
Letting third parties pay our bills pushes prices higher and limits our options.
Letting third parties pay our bills pushes prices higher and limits our options.
By restricting private health care choices, the NHS and other beloved single-payer systems were doomed from the start.
Gerald Friedman of the University of Massachusetts says yes, while the Pacific Research Institute's Sally Pipes says no.
Warren claims total costs for middle-class families would go down under her plan, but there are reasons to doubt this.
Taiwan’s system is less generous than the Sanders plan—yet it still struggles with cost control and access to care.
By planning to pass single-payer in year three of her presidency, she’s acknowledging it will never happen at all.
The presidential candidate wanted a proposal that was airtight and easy to explain. Her plan is neither.
Warren says it’s not a tax. But what else would you call a requirement that employers send money to the federal government to finance a public program?
Her refusal to answer a question about taxes isn’t just dodgy; it’s designed to mislead.
An argument against Bernie Sanders' health care plan in The New York Times.
The California senator's history of flip-flops reveal the emptiness of her campaign—and looming problems for her party.
The cost of single-payer would dwarf the price of Obamacare.
By paying dramatically lower rates, the single-payer plan would lead to a contraction in health care services.
Hospitals gamed the system and costs didn’t come down.
The nation's largest health care program faces a shortfall in less than a decade.
Designing and implementing a government-run health plan would raise many difficult questions.
The democratic socialist from Vermont wants to radically expand coverage and benefits—while paying far less for health care services.
House Democrats' new single-payer bill would legally prohibit today's private health insurance and determine financing for doctors and hospitals.
A new single-payer plan would be even more disruptive and expensive than Bernie Sanders' proposal.
Medicare for All, free college, breaking up the banks, a $15 minimum wage-the Vermont socialist wants to do it all.
The 2020 contender's single-payer pitch is all about disruption.
Support drops when you tell people it would require higher taxes, longer lines, and switching insurance plans.
The single-payer fight is pitting moderate Democrats against progressives, partly because of Obamacare.
Americans don't support single payer. They support Medicare for All, which is just a meaningless catchphrase.
Let the health care market work without government meddling.
It will cost way too much, increase wait times, and slow down the development of new drugs.
At an election-eve campaign rally, Trump all but defends the health law he tried to repeal.
In a new op-ed attacking single-payer, Trump inadvertently reveals that he's in favor of socialism-as long as it's for his supporters.
While president, Obama was a single-payer critic. Out of office, he thinks it's the wave of the future.
Yes, that's trillion with a "t."
A new audit provides more details on the state Health Authority's waste and incompetence.
Reason editors talk single-payer health care, Rand Paul's push to deauthorize foreign wars, and Chelsea Manning vs. Harvard.
Thirty years ago, the young Sanders thought the cost of universal coverage would be "astronomical."
The new plan refuses to grapple with costs or tradeoffs.
Would the Trump administration give states permission to pursue government-run health care? That's what California and New York would need.
New York collects about $80 billion in revenue annually, but the health care plan passed Tuesday would cost at least $91 billion every year (and probably more).
In 2008, Jacob Hacker called the public option a slow path to a government-run health insurance system.
It's too disruptive and too expensive.
The federal health law makes it more difficult for states to pursue their own goals.
Thinks we should follow the lead of other countries
(You don't really have to shut up, but here's my money.)
Yes, I'll donate to Reason right now! I'll keep my money today, thanksReason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksHelp Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksReason is the antidote to the same old stale take on ideas that actually matter to me.
I’ll support Free Minds and Free Markets! Not interestedReason pushes me to think critically with facts and analysis that shape my perspective and amplify the ideas I care about.
I want to make a donation so that my voice can be heard! Not todayEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedIt’s hard to trust the media these days, especially when everyone is pushing a partisan agenda. Reason stands for my right to make my own choices.
Yes, I want to make a difference for Free Minds and Free Markets! No, I’ll follow the partisan herdReason’s fearless, principled journalism keeps me sane in a crazy world.
Making a donation to Reason right now will keep me from losing my mind! No, I like being madSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksSupport the voices that advocate for your freedom. Donate to Reason today!
Yes, I want to make a difference for Free Minds and Free Markets! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today